World War II. During the Great Depression

49

Introduction


In 1929, a sudden and dramatic crash in the New York Stock Exchange marked the beginning of the economic crisis of capitalism.

The Great Depression led to economic collapse, social polarization and political instability. All in a short time. It also marked a departure from the old economic liberalism associated in particular with Britain's free trade policy. Politicians shifted to protectionism around the world, which led to the collapse of global trade, but also intensified competition for control of markets and commodities, a competition that quickly took a military form.



Rise of the USA


The First World War ended with a redivision of the world, during which Great Britain and France received large enough territories. At the same time, the British ruling class was painfully aware that the United States had ousted it as the world's financial tycoons.

At the height of its heyday in the mid-nineteenth century, Britain adopted a free trade policy because it benefited its exports when it was a prominent industrial power. Its competitors, the United States and Germany, did not follow suit. Rather, they used measures to protect their domestic markets and developing industries. Other states will follow suit.

After 1918, Britain tried to keep the pound sterling as the main international trading currency by valuing it in relation to gold. But it could not support either the gold standard or free trade as a general rule throughout the capitalist system. After an immediate post-war recession in the early 1920s, there was relative stabilization in the second half of the decade before Europe plunged into depression in 1929.

The mid-1920s recovery was based on countries importing American goods and borrowing American money. The US had tariffs to prevent the countries it was selling goods to from balancing by exporting goods to America. Instead, they were forced to borrow from the United States to cover the deficit. The winners in World War I took out American loans to pay off their debts, while the losers took them to help pay off the reparations imposed on them by the post-war treaties negotiated at Versailles.

The Wall Street crash in 1929 put an end to this financial carousel.

Between 1929 and 1932, world trade fell by a quarter. Most of the decline was due to falling incomes, the rest was due to the desire to protect trade. When the British government defaulted on America's loans, Washington retaliated by imposing trade restrictions on British imports.

Meanwhile, the expansion of US agriculture has led to overproduction and high levels of indebtedness for farmers who borrowed to expand. US agriculture has been putting pressure on import restrictions even before the Wall Street crash. Herbert Hoover, the Republican nominee, won the 1928 presidential election promising to protect agriculture. Subsequently, in June 1930, the United States imposed tariffs on more than 20 imported goods. Over the next three years, average U.S. tariffs rose to 000 percent, up from 54 percent in 39. Soon the UK, France and then Germany introduced similar tariffs over the next two years.

Having set up a tricky import control barrier to protect its home market, Washington now demanded that the UK and other European countries pay off their dollar-denominated debt (which could only be earned through exports to the United States).

In October 1932, Britain and its dominions established a system whereby British tariffs were reduced for all who trade in pounds sterling. The new block of sterling accounted for a third of world trade. In trying to stop foreign imports into the new bloc, London was challenging its competitors. If they wanted to gain more market share, they would have to rebuild the world.

The US and France followed the UK's lead in trying to create their own protected trade zones, as well as some degree of government control of the economy.

Germany, Japan and Italy did not control overseas territories and sought military expansion to provide markets for sales and raw materials. For the German economy, this global transition to protectionism was a disaster. Great Britain, France, the USA and the USSR had sufficient reserves of raw materials within their economic zones. Germany didn't have that.

Almost half of Britain's trade went with its dominions and colonies, and a third of French exports went to their colonies.

Post-war Germany


Germany's economic well-being was based on exports, but now they were excluded from the main markets, and strategic raw materials had to be bought with dollars, pounds sterling or francs. In terms of foreign trade, Germany ranked third after the United States and Great Britain in 1928, when its foreign trade amounted to 58 billion dollars. By 1935, it was $ 20,8 billion. It was financially weak, with only 1 percent of the world's gold and financial reserves in 1938, compared with 54 percent in the United States and 11 percent in Britain and France.

Before Hitler came to power, German governments already resorted to export subsidies and trade through barter or German marks, which could only be exchanged in Germany. Before Hitler came to power, some of Germany's ruling circles began to argue that its export problems and the lack of raw materials could only be solved by dominating Eastern and Southeastern Europe. Such statements have resonated with the military command.

Hjalmar Schacht resigned from his post as President of the Reichsbank in protest against the fact that Germany continues to pay war reparations in accordance with the Treaty of Versailles.

He argued that the German trade zone could cover not only Central and Eastern Europe, but also the Middle East, Latin America and the Far East. Although he never joined the Nazi Party, Schacht became acquainted with Hitler and promoted his contacts among bankers in 1932.

On November 28, 1932, Time magazine reported on a dinner at the home of steel tycoon Fritz Thyssen:

At the residence of Herr Thyssen ... Leader Hitler and Colonel Goering dined ... The Germans soon noticed the amazing fact that several news big business agencies such as Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung and Reinisch-Westfalische moved abruptly from hostility to supporting Adolf Hitler.

Noting that these newspapers were closely associated with large business circles, Time magazine added:

For the first time in his fast-paced career, Adolf Hitler “warmed up”. Stocks on the Berlin Stock Exchange, which fell after the resignation of the von Papen cabinet, strengthened again and began to rise.

By January 1933, when Hitler came to power, there were 6 million unemployed in Germany. Hitler's original economic program was similar to the New Deal of US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, which was being implemented around the same time. Government spending on highways and railroads increased, subsidies were allocated for housing, firms were forced to participate in cartels, and industry was offered cheap loans and tax exemptions. Industrial production rose from 53,8 percent of 1929 to 79,8 percent in 1934. Nonetheless, unemployment remained three times higher than in 1929, and inflation began to rise.

The large capitalist corporations remained largely intact, but they increasingly submitted to the militarization movement that they themselves supported. Hitler first, in 1933-1934, introduced relatively lenient measures, some inherited from his predecessors, aimed at creating jobs. Since 1935, they have given way to an arms economy - the "readiness economy". By 1936, the economic volume of Germany was equal to that of 1929. Three years later, it has grown another 30 percent. This expansion was based on the reduction in labor costs, implemented even before Hitler came to power.

In 1938-1939, the German economy fell into a serious economic crisis. There was a huge budget deficit - government expenditures in 1938-1939 amounted to 55 million Reichsmarks, and tax and customs revenues - only 18 million.

Much of the economic policy of the Third Reich was based on "autarky" - economic self-sufficiency. The Nazis restricted exports to curb an earlier trade deficit. But there was a limit to how far they could go along the way. Rearmament fueled the need to import raw materials, but the only way Germany could find the necessary materials in a world dominated by protectionism was by physically expanding the borders of the Third Reich. The only "solution" open to this regime of structural tensions and crises caused by dictatorship and rearmament was the strengthening of dictatorship and rearmament, then expansion, war and terror, plunder and enslavement.

Peace outside Germany


The same can be seen during this period in the United Kingdom, the United States and Japan. All of them were "locked" in a trade defense system in which the only solution to their economic problems was to redistribute the world.

Only the USSR was a kind of exception in this respect. True, the USSR, as a new type of state that survived a successful revolution of the working class, had its own problems. The old ruling class was destroyed, the new class - the proletariat - rose to the head of its state. But, in the conditions of economic blockade and destruction, foreign invasion and civil war, as well as because of the defeat of socialist revolutions in other countries, his leadership had to focus not on the international revolution, but on industrialization.

In Japan, one faction of the ruling class associated with the military command viewed China as its natural marketplace for marketing and supplying materials. After the Wall Street collapse, they attempted to "colonize" Manchuria. But it brought them into conflict with Washington, which was determined to create an "open door" to China for American goods. A minority faction in the Japanese elite, including the naval command, wanted to expand south to gain control of oil (the United States controlled Japanese supplies), rubber and other materials from the colonies of European powers (Great Britain, France and Holland), and to invade the Philippines, which were actually under US control.

The United States, without ceasing to monitor the situation in the Pacific region, also looked at the European continent. The American bourgeoisie had major investments in Europe and was already eyeing control over Middle Eastern oil. In the late 1930s, Germany and Japan, in connection with the expansionist plans of the United States, were perceived by Washington as direct competitors, as well as the British Empire, whose economic "finishing off" was part of the key strategic goals of American capital.

The Great Depression ended only with the war, as the great powers accepted the need to arm and prepare for a new war, in order to increase profits. Political and corporate leaders alike increasingly realized that there was a struggle for survival that centered on the ability of each state to control part of the global economy, to guarantee the supply of raw materials, and to weaken the ability of rival powers to do the same.

In this light, we can view World War II as a conflict between rival imperialists.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    18 October 2021 18: 30
    Each article by the "author" is "written" in a different style. laughing
    1. -4
      18 October 2021 18: 50
      Yes, just to write something. The main thing is to come in, read
    2. +2
      18 October 2021 18: 52
      Quote: parusnik
      Each article by the "author" is "written" in a different style. laughing

      hi good evening, Alexey! Or maybe the author every time imagines himself as a resident of some country, or, in general, what character? laughing and writes from their side?, so to speak?
      This article seems interesting to me, it is about a period that I know very little.
      1. +3
        18 October 2021 19: 21
        Or maybe the author every time imagines himself as a resident of some country, or, in general, what character? laughing and writing from their side?
        Thank God, we distinguish forget-me-not from ....... (c)
        This article seems interesting to me, it is about a period that I know very little.
        Open TSB or BES or World History, articles will be in these sources of similar content.
        1. 0
          18 October 2021 20: 23
          BSZ --- I will certainly open it, thank you, Alexey! hi
          Or maybe Vladimir Zyryanov thinks like this: "I want to write in the style of this!"
          That's what.
          1. +3
            19 October 2021 06: 15
            Dmitry, why did you enter into a meaningless dialogue with me, on your part? Decided to troll? laughing hi
            1. 0
              19 October 2021 06: 20
              In no case decided, I would not want you to think so. Probably, at home I continue to do what I did at work ...
              Quote: parusnik
              ..... Have you decided to troll? laughing hi

              So request relations have developed there
              1. +2
                19 October 2021 06: 23
                Alas, I think so. hi
    3. +1
      18 October 2021 19: 56
      Quote: parusnik
      Each article by the "author" is "written" in a different style. laughing

      Google Translate rules. Zyryanov, however, never gives references to the originals, indicating his authorship under the pulp. And, by the way, having the audacity to advertise some of your own (well, yes, well, yes) scribble on third-party resources.
      He is a commonplace thief and shopkeeper. The administration, however, is satisfied with this, apparently, in view of the obvious shortage of interesting authors. Although, by and large, it is not at all interesting from which trash cans Zyryanov drags scraps.
    4. 0
      18 October 2021 22: 44
      Style one - "Everything is lost".
  2. +4
    18 October 2021 19: 44
    Machine translation is certainly a good thing. But it's better to deliver the style.
    1. +1
      18 October 2021 20: 03
      Quote: mikstepanenko
      But it's better to deliver the style.

      good joke. It would be nice to have a bit of talent for this, and not to indulge in stupid translations of third-rate materials. But this is not about Zyryanov.
  3. +8
    18 October 2021 20: 13
    The Great Depression led to economic collapse, social polarization and political instability. All in a short time. It also marked a departure from the old economic liberalism associated in particular with Britain's free trade policy. Politicians shifted to protectionism around the world, which led to the collapse of global trade, but also intensified competition for control of markets and commodities, a competition that quickly took a military form.

    The author does not need to tackle such complex topics that require serious knowledge and the ability to clearly express rather complex logical constructions.
    And the thoughtless copyright of material on a question about which you know nothing, and even without possessing the appropriate presentation skills, gives some kind of historical vinaigrette.
    Protectionism did not lead to the collapse of world trade. Trade relations between states deteriorated and the efforts of the League of Nations to secure a "tariff truce" ended in nothing, but the world trade system only went wrong, not collapsed.
    The chain of events that really undermined the trading system began with the bankruptcy of Austria's largest bank, Creditanstalt, in June 1931.
    1. +7
      18 October 2021 20: 25
      And here are the lemmings with minuses pulled up. The feeder is protected.
    2. +2
      18 October 2021 21: 34
      This is not a vinaigrette, this is mashed potatoes!
      The large capitalist corporations remained largely intact, but they increasingly submitted to the militarization movement that they themselves supported. Hitler first, in 1933-1934, introduced relatively lenient measures, some inherited from his predecessors, aimed at creating jobs.

      Mama! Give me back!
  4. +1
    18 October 2021 20: 34
    By setting up a sophisticated import control barrier to protect their domestic market,

    and what is difficult about Hawley-Smoot law? This is just a sample of the exhaust of dull American shopkeepers. More precisely, if you take Hawley - the boy from the farm.
    In October 1932, Britain and its dominions established a system whereby British tariffs were reduced for all who trade in pounds sterling.

    By "system" I suppose you mean the Customs Duty Act for all importers, excluding dominions? And the so-called. "imperial preferences" concerned only subjects of the crown.
    Why fog up something? A very effective protectionist measure. The British did it, unlike the Americans. It would be better for the latter to call their law not "Hawley-Smoot", but, say, "Rabinovich-Lifshits." There would be, perhaps, a more advanced result.
  5. +2
    18 October 2021 20: 35
    Why the article?
    1. +3
      18 October 2021 20: 46
      Quote: smaug78
      Why the article?

      to the money.
  6. 0
    18 October 2021 21: 23
    In fact, it is very interesting, it’s a pity the details are few. And then they usually write "The Great Depression gave rise to conflicts that caused WWII" and that's it. I advise you to study the German side in the primary source http://militera.lib.ru/h/ergos/20.html
    1. -3
      19 October 2021 15: 37
      Quote: kamakama
      Quite interesting actually

      who can argue. But not in such a clumsy presentation.
  7. 0
    19 October 2021 01: 24
    Of course, "copying" is not good, but unlike other experts, "I did not recognize the texts", so I will consider them original from the point of view of promoting the idea of ​​the article. It is a pity that the same comments did not appreciate the "high foresight of the questions posed and the suggested answers." The author is one of the few who sees even a part, but the real essence of the described events and their current connection with our time, because we are really on the eve of the Great Depression 2.0, the likelihood of an acute phase of which has been extremely high since the end of October. So that the desire to make jokes will disappear from many. But whether the skill "to teach lessons" will appear is not a fact. It's hard for you in the next ten years, comrades, so "learn the materiel before it's too late." You can argue with people as much as you like, but history will not work with Nature.
    1. -1
      19 October 2021 06: 47
      Quote: Victor I.
      The author is one of the few who sees, albeit a part, but the real essence of the described events and their current connection with our time,

      Well, OK. And who is the author?
      Quote: Victor I.
      for we are really on the eve of the Great Depression 2.0

      And in 2008 you were not "on the eve"? Then alarmists like you were also screaming about an economic apocalypse.
      Quote: Victor I.
      Heavy You the next ten years will have comrades

      Poor us, poor ... Well, at least we will rejoice for you - a comfortable bunker, a mini-nuclear power plant, a supply of provisions, an arsenal of traumatic weapons, a comic book library and an exercise bike - right?
      Quote: Victor I.
      but with Nature, history will not work.

      So with nature or history?
      1. 0
        19 October 2021 13: 51
        Pure "Robingood", straight to death. Too bad education is not enough, Klaas lacks classes (sorry, it was impossible not to say).
        But seriously, your comments are only emotional and do not contain knowledge.
        I don’t have bunkers, but I can responsibly talk about patterns and they are common for development as such, including social, their essence (the Nature of History) clearly shows periods of development, moreover, calculated in time and having a certain content. Time periods are built on Fibbonacci numbers and golden ratios, unless of course this tells you something, so attempts to identify the series do not give uniform results. And the contraction of the historical process is spoken of as a recognized phenomenon. Development is a complex concept, but it is not based on economics, it is a particular dominant of one of the periods, in particular the 19th century, but organizational complications (as a consequence). Periods also have phases, between which there are crises and characteristics, there are also different cycles, everything is considered, everything has primary-effectual connections.
        So the Author examines the closest knot to us (the transition between periods), which lasted from 1929 to 1945 and ended with the beginning of the active development of the new world order. The current analogue (meaningful differences will be) from 2021 to 2031.
        A number of periods of social development have transition points (in the opposite direction): 2081; 2026; 1937; 1793; 1560; 1183; 573; 414 BC; 2011 BC; 4595 BC; 8776 BC
        The exactness in "antiquity" is not clear, these are calculated points, perhaps there it works as a period.
        And this is a small part of benchmarks, and 1992 is also a benchmark and many others, with its own content, by the way 1937 is very consistent
        1. -2
          19 October 2021 15: 16
          Quote: Victor I.
          The current analogue (meaningful differences will be) from 2021 to 2031.

          Amateur cryptanalysts just as vigorously pulled their favorite thesis about cyclicality by the ears in 2008. They were clamoring "oh, something will happen!" and convinced everyone that the record "To arrange a world massacre. It's time!" And the covid is just a holiday in the sandbox of alarmists.
          Quote: Victor I.
          Periods also have phases, between which there are crises and characteristics, there are also different cycles, everything is considered, everything has primary-effectual connections.

          Well, yes, of course. Here you cannot do without the heuristic machine of the old man Edelweiss. "Inside she has a thinker and a neon woman" (c)
      2. -1
        19 October 2021 14: 16
        And especially "for our little fans of military history" about the Second World War and its analogues.
        It is customary to connect 1 world and 2 world. This is not true, different stages, different problems. World 1 - an attempt to "break through new economies in the old world order", World 2 - "cleaning up the remnants of the old order in the new world."
        Both have analogs throughout history (repeated regularly, but earlier not on a global scale, but on a regional scale). Regarding the analogs of World 2, and its reference points: 2026-2031; 1937-1945 (not a slip of the tongue, and the Munich agreement and the Japanese operation still formed activity from 1937); 1793-1814; 1560-1594; 1183-1238; 573-662; 414 BC - 270 BC; 2011 BC - 1778 BC ...
        And these are the estimated dates. Considering that the early periods reached 4,5 thousand years. Then the phases stretched for centuries. So, the period from 2200 BC to 2050 BC. consisted of droughts, wars, disease and destruction, destroying all the first ancient kingdoms, now this period has shrunk to 10 years, but the repertoire is the same.
        A commentary is not a book, it will not teach reason at a time, so read, dear comrade, materiel. Now there are more and more theories that provide interesting data, Arrigi, Glazyev, Kandratyev, Chizhevsky, there are a lot of Russian theories, which cannot but rejoice. And the presented series and explanations from my own Theory of Social Development (TOR Ivanova), it allows you to remove both historical issues and predict the future, including with the features of military aspects. As you know, the generals are preparing for the past wars. Is it possible to predict and calculate everything? I don’t know, this is still a question. But much more than we thought is a statement. And, Yes, "Winter is close and will be severe", you can't throw rotten tomatoes. So take care of yourself! Otherwise, irritability leads to early facial wrinkles.
        1. -1
          19 October 2021 15: 21
          Quote: Victor I.
          Comment not book

          So take the trouble to present it in a shorter way.
          Quote: Victor I.
          from my own Theory of Social Development (TOR Ivanova)

          Did you come in for the advertisement? Somewhere, you see, the "theory" - that your obstruction was betrayed and ridiculed, decided to throw seeds on a new site? Well, I wish you the best of luck in messianism.
          1. 0
            19 October 2021 18: 19
            There are no prophets in their own country ... there are only vices - so, I look and their caretaker was found)
            I, as a specialist, operate with data, their analysis gives theories - they are complex solutions. Abstructions do not give anything, they take away what happened, think about it!
            With TOP, everything is going well, and in the scientific community too, you obviously do not need this theory. But I would advise you to think about something - a high degree of predetermination of both events and consequences-consequences, think about where you will come with such an attitude. They change when it's not too late. And it’s not about us - life, as it turned out, has a very definite mechanism of development, which is extremely dangerous today. And you can't do with "frostbitten ears" alone. "Not an alarm," but common sense.
            1. -1
              19 October 2021 19: 54
              As you say.
              Quote: Victor I.
              Everything is going well with TOP, and in the scientific community too

              I am restrainedly happy for you.
              Quote: Victor I.
              You obviously don't need this theory.

              No.
              Quote: Victor I.
              I would advise you to think about something - a high degree of predetermination

              Necessarily. I will choose some gloomy predictor with my own theory as my guru ... better with a sonorous name ... something from Scandinavian mythology ... I will spread quotes from his compilations on the network, demonstrating a high IQ to the crazy ... whoever frowns or yawns, I will look with the arrogance of an initiate and a bit of pity ... I'll sit down on antidepressants ...
              No, nafig, I'll remain a hedonofatalist. laughing
              1. 0
                20 October 2021 02: 19
                It's nice to deal with hedonofatalists, almost adherents, at such a pace and not far from like-minded people, this cannot but rejoice.
                By the way, they spread the infection, the light of knowledge finds its way by itself, so do not kill yourself too much. If there is a craving to carry something, then it is better to be kind and cheerful. I can offer aphorisms and a humor column. No worries, all proprietary.
                As for theories, the question is not about them, but about what hits both Gedenists and not very much on the head at an unexpected moment. Nature obviously has rules and in the process of comprehending them, we can say something exactly, we learn somewhere, it will not come by itself, and life punishes harshly for an incorrect answer. It is not possible to save a person from himself. This is just a chance to think about how you will use it ... and do not look for predetermined horrors in everything, so much bile is not typical for gedenists
                1. -1
                  20 October 2021 09: 33
                  Quote: Victor I.
                  I can offer aphorisms and a humor column. No worries, all proprietary.

                  Thank you, I'm not interested. Judging by the mentoring, sorry, tediousness, you have a specific humor) So, I wish you success in recruiting adepts. The Strugatskys had a funny and very conceptual grotesque - the profession of "reader". The point is, forgive the free retelling, that prolific writers certainly need a consumer of their work. Otherwise, graphomaniacs physically and mentally waste away, decadent, etc., which undermines the overall harmony. You, the intellectual elite (we will not dissemble - you count yourself as such) desperately need attention, otherwise (oh, gods!) The work will perish in vain. Therefore, self-popularization is your everything. Glory to Saint Binar - now an ideal communication environment has been created for this.
                  For sim and so on.
                  hi
                  1. 0
                    20 October 2021 23: 54
                    That you, with such control, not a single graphomaniac will slip through. All thoughts are in line. Only now, with the selection to the intellectual elite, you have something "not right". Or are the Strugatskys you not the intellectual elite? A great discovery, you will go far, God forbid, and you yourself will find yourself in this elite, the men will not understand. So hold on! And the main thing is how intellectual spots will begin to show through after reading the materials, you dust them. Otherwise, 1929 will be a dream, and then 1937, inevitably, horror! And it will come true yet - kapets worldview!
                    Take care of yourself!
                    There are not many left until difficult times, if you have no intention of accepting reality as it is and solving problems, enjoy the remaining time, you still will not accept the new, and the old will never return. You don't have to believe. Even memorizing is a surprise.
  8. 0
    19 October 2021 13: 59
    In 1929, a sudden and dramatic crash in the New York Stock Exchange marked the beginning of the economic crisis of capitalism.


    The collapse was caused artificially by the Fed's actions, which sharply raised the interest rate (loan interest).
    Most of the economic crises were and are of a man-made nature.
    1. 0
      19 October 2021 15: 02
      Man-made by no means rejects the objective development of laws. Even motivations have reasons, including objective ones. The problem of 1929 (one of) is that the development required the expansion of money circulation, the emission was generally associated with gold, and its capabilities "rested" on natural boundaries, "the new debt instruments, at that time, were not realized in terms of risks, here" leverage "and dispersed the markets. for 1929 the amount of money in the US market doubled, while there was no more emission. That is, the Fed with new instruments had neither leverage nor understanding how. A new mechanism was required - regulation. Its later Keynes brought, but the delay in adoption led to a deepening of the crisis, while Stalin timely introduced a new administrative-command system, and this created the basis for the Leap.
      Now the debt and administrative systems have outlived themselves, and new instruments and circumstances have inflated new super bubbles, their destruction requires further concrete actions. They will also be man-made, but reflect objective laws.
      1. 0
        20 October 2021 08: 43
        Even motivations have reasons, including objective ones.


        The motivation was as simple as mooing: to ruin industrial capital, and then buy it cheaply, which is what happened.

        in 1929 the amount of money on the US market doubled, while there was no longer any emission.


        Everyone rushed to sell their shares, there was nowhere to place their financial assets: everything went to hell. Hence the excess of "unrelated" money.

        That is, the Fed with new instruments had neither leverage nor understanding how.


        They had everything. Crises, like wars (both World), only contributed to the growth of the influence and authority of this gang of bankers.
        Actually, the emergence of the FRS is due to another crisis, the so-called. "Depression" at the beginning of the 20th century, which was also bankers and arranged to convince the US government to agree to the creation of the Federal Reserve terry plutocracy).

        A new mechanism was required - regulation. Keynes later brought it, but the delay in adoption led to a deepening of the crisis.


        As the banking oligarchy increased its influence but the state apparatus, it did not object to the programs of Keynes and Roosevelt's New Deal. Let the state strengthen its position in the economy, since the bankers have managed to strengthen their control over the state machine.
        In fact, the bankers were the net winners.
        And the costs of the New Deal (increase in debts, acceleration of inflation) were eliminated thanks to the provocation of a new war and some other not very democratic operations.
        1. 0
          21 October 2021 00: 27
          Financial capital existed before, but the purchase began only in the 40-50s. There is a wonderful work by Arriga, The Long Twentieth Century, it is just devoted to and examines in detail the mechanisms of capital accumulation and the change in production and financial phases.
          So it's not that simple. Now, going through a similar period, we are seeing a surge of tech companies and their interception of financial functions through ecosystems. Finance as an institution is dissolving before our eyes, and if earlier their circle was narrow, today whoever does not provide financial services.
          The doubling of the money supply in the United States in 1929 is well documented. Growth in financial debt burden. This is a different type of emissions. Not a budget. The analysis of historical development reveals a whole mechanism (exhaustion of emission opportunities by economies - the emergence of a new instrument and the institution of emission - the primary development of a new emission instrument without limitation - imbalances - crisis - adjustment of the emission system). Up to ten such cycles can be traced, in the global mode - now there will be the fourth.
          No one denies that decision-making, the creation of institutions, mechanisms, conflicts have specific motivations and actions, and specific individuals are behind this, but the implementation is not spontaneous and is a consequence of the development of laws. The arrival of bankers and administrators at the beginning of the 20th century (and not at any other time) is an objectively defined process. As it is now, the development of technological and social processes.
          A crisis of this kind is not the ability at the beginning of the cycle to fully work with new instruments (hence the sharp development of bubbles and their strong rupture), plus a conflict between old and new elites. Today these are "financiers" and "networkers", and "industrialists" are the opening act. In 1929 - "the" industry "and" financiers ", and the opening act of the" hucksters ".
          Visually, the main thing is money, but the crisis due to the fact that the system became more complicated and could no longer work spontaneously in the market, it is regulation that stabilizes this state. So the main ones are administrators (even the term was such a revolution of managers). Today, coordinators will become the main ones, and the mechanism will be of public control. And public utility.
          1. 0
            21 October 2021 09: 02
            So it's not that simple. Now, going through a similar period, we are seeing a surge of tech companies and their interception of financial functions through ecosystems. Finance as an institution is dissolving before our eyes, and if earlier their circle was narrow, today whoever does not provide financial services.


            And who owns these same "tech companies"? By the way, how do they exist? Do not need crediting themselves? Bank-independent? Or maybe they have already become issuers themselves, pushing the Fed into the background?

            Well, this is debatable. Rather, "finance as an institution" dissolves everything in itself, and then absorbs, finance becomes the main and defining type of business activity.
            Hence the triumph of neoliberalism and monetarism, which assess all socio-economic processes through a financial prism. A completely flawed point of view, as if physiologists viewed the body as a simple appendage of the circulatory system.
            And the physiocrats and Keynes were pushed into a corner for a long time.
            Which, I agree, leads to disastrous consequences and not only for Western economies.

            So the main ones are administrators (even the term was such a revolution of managers).


            They were and will remain only servants and "scapegoats" on whom all the miscalculations will hang.
            The main ones will remain in the shadows. Let all these "revolutionary managers" experiment in the management of economic processes, the buns will still go to the financial elite, in fact, hereditary.

            And on public utility - spit from a skyscraper. Because there is no society in Western countries. Just a crowd, a bunch of disunited "human atoms", concerned about personal success and survival, objects of successful manipulation through the media and IT technologies.
            1. 0
              21 October 2021 13: 35
              The periods of development I described above, they are not uniform, they are shrinking and the last one is 89 years, and the initial ones in social development are 4,5 thousand years. At such intervals, "consciousness is lost" and it seems that this is eternity. But in nature they change, and with them a whole set with a ruling class, institution, instrument, and dominant forms of organization. Pay attention, now the main words are debt, corporations, finance, top managers.
              For money - simple logic dictates who has money - he rules the world. Who issues the money? And they are emitted by different structures. Banks now, because the formation of debt by them is the main issue today. And when were there kings and not only, or will you look for them behind the scenes? But this tool has been exhausted and is not working correctly, so the crises are getting worse. You have no idea in what dire condition most of the banks are - they are practically bankrupt. And the current crisis will collapse a significant part of them, rebuilding the entire landscape.
              Against this background, new emission formats - electronic and private through platforms are knocking on the door, but they are spontaneously born and they still have many childhood illnesses and this also leads to a crisis (in 1929 these were loans and securities, now - crypt and ICO). An attempt by finance to crush ecosystems, which is not everywhere, will lead to the threat of transhumanism (a new format of fascism), a very toxic thing. This is what you have to fight with.
              For your information, within the framework of the redistribution over the past 7 years, 700 banks have been liquidated in Russia, 350 remain. So in the liquidated ones - all the large owners and the main management received real terms and large lawsuits, as a rule. It's only the beginning. They take the place of capitalists at the beginning of the 20th century. By google. The capitalization of the largest techno companies (almost a dozen) exceeded $ 2 trillion each. The iPhone's profit rate is over 200%.
              As for administrators, this is a natural continuous historical process of management development, much has been written about it. And it has long been known that if a company has several owners or the state, then the management disposes of it.
              1. 0
                21 October 2021 13: 51
                Banks now, because the formation of debt by them is the main issue today. And when were there kings and not only, or will you look for them behind the scenes?


                Exactly.
                There is no need to look for kings behind the scenes. But those who were close to them, who even lent money to kings - why not?
                "The giving hand is always higher than the taking hand."

                For money - simple logic dictates who has money - he rules the world.


                The world is ruled by those who control financial and information flows. The two most important resources.

                You have no idea in what dire condition most of the banks are - they are practically bankrupt. And the current crisis will collapse a significant part of them, rebuilding the entire landscape.


                Someone loses, and someone finds. In times of crisis, assets do not disappear - they just change owners. Redistribution of property and artificial selection at the same time.
                And bankers suffer least of all, although it is their actions that serve as a trigger. Let us recall how the 2008 crisis began and in what office. "Brothers Lemons", yeah.
                But also remember who received real help according to the "Paulson plan", who was saved in the first place (by the way, there was a similar picture in the Russian Federation).
                And it immediately became clear which of the animals is "more equal" in our global Animal Farm.

                It doesn't matter who has what capitalization. Working capital works through banks; nowadays, even housewives rarely use cash. And the bank operates with money in bank accounts, having a good profit. And the same financial tycoons operate with shares of enterprises of any profile. So the lion's share goes to them anyway.
                As long as there is a "free" market circulation of financial resources, it is financial institutions that will be at the very top of the pyramid.
                And no one will throw these monetary kings from the throne without destroying the throne itself and the pyramid under it.
                1. 0
                  21 October 2021 16: 09
                  You are guided by the outgoing order. In it, indeed, all funds are in bank accounts and money is inevitably through banks.
                  And 2008 was still in this logic, so there was a recovery, in money and through banks. And the streams of information, previously were not streams at all and add up to these only now
                  But this century-old cycle ends, and that's why such a cardinal change is taking place. Debts 280 trillion. Global GDP is already lower than debts, rates are becoming negative, papers have been cut into 5 billion dollars, they are starting to break through from purely finance to other spheres - we see an unprecedented acceleration of inflation, if you know financial statistics, look at it since 1800, the peaks are very indicative.
                  Yes, the world is ruled with the help of finance, but their production has changed historically. And those who produced them ruled.
                  Now they are bankers. What you described corresponds to a hundred years of practice. But this was not always and not always will be. The entire staff of the first banking houses in the 1370s consisted of a dozen people. And their first bankruptcies were due to the fact that the kings did not return their debts. Then the bankers were only entrepreneurs at risk and there is no need for unnecessary illusions about them.
                  Cost-wise, finance is a big bubble today. Now the limiting conditions have come, therefore, after losing 99% of the cost of restoring the previous system, it is no longer possible (in a similar situation, ancient Rome retained only 4% of the gold in the coin, silver disappeared altogether).
                  Finance is being actively replaced by FinTech, the monopoly on money has already been destroyed and central banks are rewriting the rules, so that the financial platforms will slide into high-tech compact financial services.
                  But with ecosystems it will be more difficult.
                  In general, you are simply afraid to break away from the prevailing reality and do not see the objectivity of the transition. It's difficult, but the article just reveals the features of the past of such a transition, and some of the characteristics turned out to be quite. However, to go to today, we need generalizations and a system, I wrote a lot about them in the comments. And for orientation, consider that "it's already autumn 1929 in the yard"
                  1. 0
                    22 October 2021 09: 10
                    Debts 280 trillion. Global GDP is already lower than debts, rates are becoming negative, papers have been cut into 5 billion dollars, they are starting to break through from purely finance to other spheres - we see an unprecedented acceleration of inflation, if you know financial statistics, look at it since 1800, the peaks are very indicative.


                    This is true. Only the financial sector is able to compensate for losses from inflation and a fall in the exchange rate by additional emission, but for others it is more difficult, they have nothing to compensate for their losses.
                    Yes, the entire world financial system, in fact, is a giant "pyramid", but it has not collapsed so far precisely because its existence is beneficial not only to bankers, and its collapse will bury everyone under the rubble, all without exception, including and those who create the shoots of an alternative way of life.

                    About crises. In fact, at the present time there is no crisis and is not expected.
                    What is a crisis? It is an economic disease. There is a normal state (health), and there is a deviation - a disease. If the disease is treated, it will go away; if it is treated well, it will go away faster.
                    But the current state of the world economy and finance is not a deviation from the norm, not a disease, this is the norm, "health" as it is possible. And to treat is already useless, old age is not treated. Short-term doping is possible, but relapse is inevitable.
                    However, the process of withering will last for decades, "health" will be maintained by all and in all possible ways (up to the incitement of large-scale wars).
                    There will be no abrupt collapse of the "system"; there will be an emergency landing, albeit a rather hard one.
                    I'm not sure that those who, according to your statements, should replace the bankers, will survive this landing. I do not exclude that they will have to play the unenviable role of a damper.
                    1. 0
                      23 October 2021 15: 29
                      You are expressing a very sane, consistent point of view, which, I agree, suggests itself from the observations of past years, or just maybe.
                      However, life and knowledge make their own corrections, it also happens.
                      You see and extend the current trends in their internal logic, as if they had sufficient development power and there were no larger (in terms of time and content) processes. By the way, the liberals are just trying to insist that everything is not just linear, but also chaotic. That is, their favorite theory of Chaos is "crush and conquer", but it is not. Development has a complex system of cycles and phases of development, simultaneously several different time and content. For example, what happened in the 19th century and the last 100 years are two different cycles, successive but different. On this score, there are many recognized theories, the same Theory of Arriga and his capital cycles.
                      The end of capitalism is a consequence of yet another process, it affects not just how, but definitely 4 cycles, forming its own.
                      Inside the cycles, everything is also scheduled, and the change of development by crises is about that. And so far it seemed to us not systemic, but the system in them is present and very logical. The most interesting thing is that everything is tied to time intervals, that is, it is determined in time. And this is not one identified step, but dozens of strictly deterministic ones.
                      You write that printing money will endlessly remove any problem. This is not the case, when the printing boom of money appeared, acc. crises (late 17th and late 18th centuries) and then created many rules for maintaining a balance, in which they are now printed, but it has side-altars - violation - hyperinflation, and there were enough such cases, but now the tool is completely exhausted, by the way, world inflation is already measured in tens of percent.
                      The collapse is not beneficial to anyone, but no one controls it, the process has already become spontaneous and the pressure in the system is extreme. And that the world of a hundred responsible states would collapse, one irresponsible one with a printing press is enough.
                      The containers are large, but limited.
                      Crisis is a phenomenon, imbalance, in which there are threats of destruction of the system. The economy is one of the parties, and crises are always complex. And under socialism there were those very crises, but since, according to the theory, they should not be ignored, and the social system does not forgive this. Crises in the economy are recognized by everyone - the accumulated costs of imbalances. When the imbalances are current, they are quickly corrected (pressure relief valve), but what we have now is a design defect (near-limit capabilities) and their correction is a design change.
                      1. 0
                        24 October 2021 09: 30
                        You write that printing money will endlessly remove any problem. This is not the case, when the printing boom of money appeared, acc. crises (late 17th and late 18th centuries) and then created many rules for maintaining a balance, in which they are now printed, but it has side-altars - violation - hyperinflation, and there were enough such cases, but now the tool is completely exhausted, by the way, world inflation is already measured in tens of percent.


                        I did not state this. Rather, printing money allows the burden of problems to be passed on to others. For the time being, of course.
                        Alas, the "balance rules" are already in the bin (as you noted in your previous posts). The patient is more likely alive than dead, but is under constant financial drip. As soon as the Central Banks of the G2007 countries return the discount rate to the XNUMX level, the financial system will collapse.
                        Of course, no one will do this. Everyone will cling to the current "status quo", fully aware of the catastrophic consequences of the collapse of world finances. So far, there are such opportunities, and not so much in the economic, but primarily in the political sphere.
                        And global inflation ... well, its burden will also be shifted to the extreme. Another blow to the so-called. the "middle class" (the poor already have nothing to lose), which, incidentally, fits into the main trend of development in line with the interests of the financial elite.
                        The middle class fulfilled its main political mission - ensured the West's victory in the Cold War, increasing the attractiveness of this West. Now it is no longer needed, especially since it has become too resource-intensive.
                        In any case, an objective shortage of resources is inevitable and the preservation of the world economy oriented towards mass consumption (mainly by the middle class) becomes impossible.
                        Since the process cannot be canceled, it should be led and directed in the most optimal (for their own interests) channel.
                        This is what the financial elite will try to do, using all the opportunities, even if it will be associated with some losses. The main thing is to preserve your power and position, control over the financial system, even if this system dries up. It is not the absolute amount of power that is important, but its fullness (it is better to be the first in the village than the second in Rome, so it’s not scary if even Rome becomes a village, just to stay first).
                        It will work out or not - time will tell.
                      2. 0
                        24 October 2021 15: 03
                        You have quite a sound view of things, but perhaps you lack a deep systemic understanding of the patterns. However, given that they are only being revealed, this is more a feature of the cognition process, and not a disadvantage. I am doing this research systematically. Therefore, let me clarify a number of points.
                        Printing money really has the property of redistribution and leads to impoverishment of the masses. There is Jenny's odds on this, it clearly shows that the last overpick was in 1928-29, the next one is being formed now.
                        The process is objective and affects the middle class too. It occurs due to the separation of the ruling class, which at a certain phase of the cycle works only on its own wool. So, in the United States since the 1980s, the income of only 1% of the population - top managers (300 times), what can we say about the rest of the addicts. That's right - for the time being, but it's not spontaneous and not accidental, this is a system, at first it leads to the rupture of global political ties and institutions (since 2013 we have seen this), then trade, now it is the turn of financial instruments, and it will pull production, right up to social and for each - its own period.
                        I found the right solution - by changing the structure and rules of the game - and got to the line of a new start (an epidemic is like a litmus test).
                        By balances. Old balances are not the problem. They survive that. But a new division strikes the imbalance, its initial adjustment reveals inconsistencies and now they lead to the specified crisis (1929 is debt instruments, now - world currencies, including the figure and the dollar).
                        They will cling to power, but there is a brutal corrosion of power see America and therefore Russia actively has the opportunity to form real independence.
                        But clinging to ugly alliances will strike, this is how fascism appears, alas, it is also natural and will spoil blood.
                        Indeed, globalists will drum up their own population. It is not theirs. Yes, that the middle class will fight themselves too.
                        About the scarcity of resources. Resources are scarce not by themselves, but from the point of view of the level of development of society and its structure, the current level of organization has been exhausted and if it does not change, then this system will not come out of the crisis, see RIM, Sumer, Harappa, etc.
                        The question of the psychology of consumption did not arise by chance, and now it has fulfilled its mission, while at the next turn the security will increase manifold and it is possible to show at the expense of what and how.
                        There is no question of robotic slaves (as a system), you don't call an electric drill a slave.
                        Another thing is that general goal-setting (all for the sake of profit) will inevitably go away - its mechanism is not just almost exhausted, but it already leads to the destruction of the system, since it comes at the expense of quality and in contradiction with the main tasks, so that there is a social society ahead with a certain period transition.
                        In general, the history of the development of society turned out to be surprisingly logical and punctual in time. So there won't be decades of agony. The countries will begin to emerge from the crisis in different ways, but by 24-25 there will already be leaders of the new formation from 26 to 31, they will find out who and why will remain, tough, and then - the new Yalta and Bretton Woods, only with a different ruling class, and predominantly social orientation for every taste
                    2. 0
                      23 October 2021 15: 44
                      The same person exists according to the same laws and the same reference points are allocated, they coincide with the identified psychologists and doctors. But here you are confusing the point of crisis (which for a person is quite local (although its consequences - the breakdown of the system stretches for years) and its consequences for individual systems. this time "scenario that" continues and the phases change and the krizhis are different. So nothing stops and no one is expected. However, the future will bring surprises here too.
                      Regarding the devouring of those who come to replace. We will all die someday. And we have no replacements, there is a constant rotation. So someday they will definitely devour the new ones, but first they will devour the old ones.
                      At the same time, there will be those few who master the art of balance. Finally, about the cherry - ends the 10 thousand-year (I am not an adherent of round dates, but there is such a cycle) cycle of the vertical development of society, when the surplus was sufficient for redistribution (which formed the vertical), but not sufficient for the affordable consumption of the masses. Now this threshold is removed by automation and we are in a historical moment of movement when everyone will become the "elite". It is not instantaneous and for many it is painful, but not inevitable. And it does not depend on desires. The nature is like that.
                      As for the transitions - see 1929-1939, it is better to compare with other countries. So your fears are understandable, but objectively surmountable.
                      1. 0
                        24 October 2021 09: 44
                        At the same time, there will be those few who master the art of balance. Finally, about the cherry - ends the 10 thousand-year (I am not an adherent of round dates, but there is such a cycle) cycle of the vertical development of society, when the surplus was sufficient for redistribution (which formed the vertical), but not sufficient for the affordable consumption of the masses. Now this threshold is removed by automation and we are in a historical moment of movement when everyone will become the "elite". It is not instantaneous and for many it is painful, but not inevitable. And it does not depend on desires. The nature is like that.


                        No automation will lift the threshold. Oh, these dreams of a new "slave paradise" in which the poorest citizen will have four robot slaves. Utopia, not too attractive, by the way.
                        Even the use of nano- and bio-technologies, all these 3D printers and other things will not turn everyone into an "elite". The problems of social and even property inequality cannot be solved by technological methods. Since the source of problems is largely in the person himself, and not in his environment.
                        If the problems could be solved, then it would be possible to build a completely just society even with a very poor "material and technical base."
                        And so ... "give the tradesman a gold limousine, he wants a platinum one."

                        On the other hand, the objective scarcity of resources and environmental problems are not fictions, but an objective reality. If every inhabitant of the Earth consumed as much as the average Yankee consumes, we would need a couple more Earth planets, alas.
                        Until the development of other planets becomes a reality, resource constraints will not disappear. But, on the other hand, with the existing world order, the real development of other planets (and even in the interests of the majority) will remain in the realm of fantasy.
                      2. 0
                        24 October 2021 15: 56
                        History rightly assumes that society did not develop justly.
                        Your questions are getting deeper and more fundamental. And we have the answers to them. I'm not sure just that the limitation of the volume of the text will give a clear explanation.
                        Technological and economic development is a necessary but not sufficient condition for harmonious development.
                        And, yes, justice is more of a tool than a basis and plays a different role at different stages of development.
                        Where there is no structure, the surplus is divided among all. The structure in the presence of a general surplus (but in the absence of a surplus for all) forms a redistributed reserve - it ensures the development of society, more precisely, its 5% activity.
                        There has been enough mold at all times, but mold can neither concentrate power, nor contribute to overall development, therefore, almost 10 thousand years of vertical development, in which 90% ensured 10% progress (and at the same time, the model of society with minimal costs), otherwise we would all still sat with stone chisels.
                        This is a certain billing period and it ended in the late 1930s.
                        If you notice, the structure of society has already changed radically: in rural areas - a third remains, and in some countries even less, and yes, automation, but not only it, predetermines the transition to a flat society (everyone will become an elite, and even a network organization).
                        Reason and conscience are great mysteries, but here is how society has been fighting over this for 200 years and there is a corresponding line of development for this.
                        Including the concept of "Soviet people". I'm not talking about dogmas, but about directions. You will be surprised, but ethics also developed according to the general schedule and science in general. By the way, now is the period of great scientific breakthroughs. So it's not easy, but we will become people and not spontaneously again.
                        As for the resources, a new revolution in materials is planned. The direction is synthesis. And in a compartment with 3d and so on, this will really turn the situation around, the whole transition will not be instantaneous, but by 2047 there will be full automation and a new energy format (thermonuclear probably) and a new res base.
                        In addition, in order to overcome other deficits, the next step is really the Space, movement there also according to the plan, and everything is accelerating, so not centuries, but decades will change everything in a certain way.
                        Already described means. some of the asteroids and there are orders of magnitude more resources than on earth available.
                        So, just the implementation of one project for 12 billion dollars will bring gold to the ground by several orders of magnitude more than there is on the ground in access. And after all, someone will do it. And there are many more useful things. So it's not cloudless, but grandiose. The technology is already there.
                        By the way, both the presence of an entrepreneurial society and the transition from it to a social one have a completely explainable and clearly time-determined nature.
                        But so far VD 2.0.
                      3. 0
                        24 October 2021 17: 27
                        The cornerstone thought. Automation is not just an adaptation, it is not really a question of a new slavery.
                        Here we have some fundamental social reversals. First, production can do without a person and the issue of his consumption and redistribution is no longer related to his productivity. That is, the base of a horizontal society has been formed, where a person is a manager, the elite affects everyone, and the passive elite arises along the line of social incapacity, which fundamentally changes the rules in the elite itself. This imposes conditions - the level of education and responsibility of each.
                        The models may be different, but the competition between them will put forward a more efficient one, and these are the systems where the share of responsible and more developed ones is higher.
                        Second, we are no longer Sapiens. This is a scientific fact. The point is that evolution is not just a physical process. Social evolution has created a publicus, but it has already ended. A universal one is developing - it will delight an explosive mixture of bioperformances, technologies and AI on the basis of knowledge, skills and our actions.
                        And there are third and fourth.
                        As a result, from 2021 (26) to 2081 - the search for social forms of a new social format of society (in parallel, different types will develop in a dozen macroregions), a new carrier of Homo Universe, and new territories - a vertical world (and will go under water and into space).
                        The paradox is that to master a flat world - you need a vertical society, and in order to have a vertical world - a flat one.
                        And this is not a distant future. What we are doing now will lay his active work in 20 years, and in another 30 years the world will completely change. This is the schedule and it is maintained throughout all stages of development. During the same years, there will be a "breakdown and wagering" of the remnants of "profitable entrepreneurship" and gradually (we do not say that it is painless) the factor of financial calculation will take its modest place in a whole string of other balances.
  9. 0
    29 October 2021 23: 13
    This is some kind of google translator. Curve terminology, non-Russian expressions.
  10. 0
    30 November 2021 06: 50
    Confused millions for billions. Explaining scientifically - it happens ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"