Dying Hope - I-52 minelayer

41
Dying Hope - I-52 minelayer

Today, most of those who are interested in history military equipment, they know that the Kryukov Carriage Works (Ukraine, Poltava region) in Soviet times, in addition to purely peaceful products, also produced military equipment. The company specialized in the development and production of engineering vehicles designed to overcome water obstacles and ensure crossings. The most famous examples: self-propelled tracked ferry GSP, floating conveyor PTS-1 (2), ferry bridge machine PMM-2 "Volna". However, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the share of military orders declined sharply.

In the spring of 1992, the management of the Kryukov Carriage Works received a letter from the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. It said that Ukraine had chosen a defensive doctrine for itself and, as a result, an offensive weapon, which also included the landing gear that the plant produced, she does not need.



Thus, the production of military equipment at the plant was suspended, although it did not exclude the possibility of returning to the orders of the Ministry of Defense of the already independent Ukraine.

New task


And such an opportunity presented itself in the same 1992. The plant was tasked with developing a new engineering vehicle - a minelayer. Although this task went beyond the scope of specialization, since the enterprise produced floating equipment, the special department of the chief designer enthusiastically began to develop a new minelayer commissioned by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. Viktor Shchepetov, deputy chief designer for serial production, was appointed as the project manager, and Ivan Plyutin was the chief designer of the machine.

The minelayer was designed to remotely deploy anti-personnel and anti-tank minefields, as well as mixed minefields.

The minelayer patent said: “The prototype of the invention is a universal minelayer UMP, developed on the basis of the ZIL-131 vehicle". Here, the negative aspects of this minelayer were also noted: the lack of protection for the crew, vehicle systems, mining systems, and the like.


Mine layer UMP

Therefore, the purpose of developing a new minelayer was: to provide protection against weapons damage to the crew, minelayer systems, mining installations, to ensure overcoming water obstacles, high cross-country ability.

The new vehicle was based on the floating chassis of the Kharkov-made MT-LBu armored personnel carrier. A gas turbine supercharged diesel engine with a capacity of 300 hp was used as a power plant. with. A caterpillar propeller provided a good maneuverability to the car, and the design of the armored personnel carrier itself allowed the car to float.


Armored personnel carrier MT-LBu

Machine design


Structurally, the vehicle consists of an armored chassis and a lift with a mining installation.

The machine body is divided into three sections. In front of the vehicle, in the first compartment, there is a cockpit with a mining control panel. The middle compartment is a power compartment with an engine. The third is a mining installation and power mechanisms.


Layout diagram of the I-52 minelayer from the patent:
1 - armored vehicle body,
2 - containers for mines,
3 - turntable,
4, 5 - power elements of the lift

The mining installation is equipped with a turntable with two containers with mine cartridges. Placing the unit on a lift ensures its movement from the working position above the body to the transport one - inside the body, with the lowest position of the center of mass.




Containers with mines in a combat position. Drawing from the patent for I-52

Preparation for work includes: lifting the mining installation over the hull, setting the angle of lifting of containers, setting the direction of throwing mines by rotating the platform in a horizontal plane. After that, you can shoot mines, both from the spot and on the move. At the same time, the minelayer can shoot mines, including on terrain with slopes up to 15 degrees (ascents, descents, slopes).

Testing and adoption


In 1994, the minelayer, named "Flint", entered preliminary and factory tests. The first demonstration of the car to the military happened by accident. During the factory tests, as A. Kudiyarova notes in her book "The Birth of Amphibians", the general director V. Prikhodko received a call from the KrAZ plant with a request to help. An inspection arrived at KrAZ with a general, and the factory workers had nothing to show through the Ministry of Defense.

At this time, work was underway on the minelayer to regulate the operability of containers for mines and load ammunition into containers. The containers themselves were half filled with mine cartridges. For the demonstration, they decided not to fill the containers to the end, because they did not plan to shoot. For the military authorities who arrived at the plant, the lifting and lowering of containers, their opening, turning and fixing the installation in various positions were shown. The general who headed the inspection even climbed into the control department, got acquainted with the principle of operation of the equipment issuing the command to shoot mines. In short, the car worked well and everyone liked it.

Then there were tests at the airfield in Kakhovka for shooting mines, determining the shooting range at various angles of lifting containers. The main mine that was used in the tests was the PFM-1 high-explosive anti-personnel mine (PFM-1S).

The PFM-1S mine differs from the PFM-1 in the presence of a self-destruction mechanism that detonates the mine after a certain time has elapsed after it has been transferred to a combat position. Each container of the minelayer contains 90 KSF-1S cassettes with 64 PFM-1S mines in each cassette.

As A. Kudiyarova writes in her book, while checking the operability of the smoke grenade system, an unpleasant incident occurred. The smoke screen was blown off by the wind on the Kremenchug-Poltava highway, adjacent to the airfield, stopping traffic for 15 minutes.


Stages of transferring mine containers to a combat position. Kakhovka. Photo from the book by A. Kudiyarova "The Birth of Amphibians"

In 1995, State tests of two experienced minelayers took place at the Military Engineering Institute in the city of Kamenets-Podolsk. Here, the car was shooting mines, including during overcoming a water barrier, its driving performance was checked at the machine track.

The machine passed the tests, but one significant drawback was highlighted: with the maximum lifting of containers with mines, the height of the machine was almost 3,5 m. This problem had to be solved during mass production.

Another curious incident occurred in Kamyanets-Podolsk.

During the demonstration of the shooting of mines, it was decided to shoot all the ammunition at once. And when, after the completion of the shooting, the testers got out of the car, they were surprised - the tribune, where the members of the state commission were, was completely empty.

And this is what happened.

While driving past the stand, one of the mine containers turned out to be directed towards the stand, and the mines began to fly away towards the observers, which is almost 5 minutes. Although everyone knew that the mines were training mines, they decided: God protects those who are saved! In addition, no one wanted to get a mine, albeit such a small one, "on the hat".




State tests at the test site in Kamenets-Podolsk, 1995

After the completion of state tests, the minelayer under the designation I-52 was put into service. But it was never mass-produced.

In the same 1995, the layout of the minelayer was shown at the international arms exhibition in Abu Dhabi. Everyone liked the car, they were interested in its capabilities and characteristics, but no orders were received for the car.

They again remembered the I-52 in 2003 in the "Program for the Development of Engineering Weapons until 2010", where it is written that by 2005 the first I-52 minelayers should be purchased for the rapid reaction forces.

But the cars were not purchased again.

The reason is trivial: the state did not have the money to buy new equipment.


I-52 minelayer in boxing. Firing containers


Back view of mine containers

Baptism of fire, one of the two released I-52 minelayers passed as part of the 12th separate engineering regiment during the hostilities in the East of Ukraine near Mariupol. There are no exact data on the use of the minelayer, so it is too early to talk about the effectiveness of its use.

Today it is known that only one minelayer remained in service, but he no longer takes part in hostilities. There is no information about the fate of the second minelayer.

Thus, in the mid-90s, Ukrainian designers managed to create an original amphibious minelayer, which in terms of its technical and combat characteristics surpassed all existing machines of this class at that time, especially in terms of crew protection and mining equipment.

Unfortunately, today the fate of this project is vague. Most likely, the I-52 minelayer will not find further development, since Ukraine has signed the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Production and Storage of Antipersonnel Mines.

Since 2016, the destruction of the PFM-1 PFM-1S mines, the main weapon for the I-52 minelayer, began.

The main weapon of the I-52


The minelayer can use different types of anti-personnel and anti-tank mines, designed specifically for remote mining.
Mines are placed in a drop only on the surface of the ground. The main ones are:

- antipersonnel mines PFM-1 and PFM-1S;
- anti-tank mines PTM-1 and PTM-3.


Mina PFM-1, in common use "petal"

Mine PFM-1S, in contrast to PFM-1, has a self-liquidator, which works in the interval from 1 to 40 hours (depending on weather conditions). Main characteristics of mines: weight - 80 g, mass of liquid explosive - 40 g, width - 60 mm, length - 119 mm, height - 20 mm, actuation force - from 5 kg.


Anti-tank mine PTM-1

Mines PTM-1 and PTM-3 are anti-vehicle (anti-tank) mines. Mine PTM-1 is triggered under a wheel or track. The PTM-3 mine is triggered both under the wheel (track) and from the magnetic field of the armored vehicle (that is, it is not necessary to run over it), and strikes the bottom of the armored vehicle with a cumulative jet. The body of both mines has the shape of a parallelepiped. So, the more modern mine PTM-3 has a body 33 cm long, width and height - 8,8 cm, weight - 4,9 kg, mass of explosives of the TGA type, TNT - 1,8 kg, the time of transfer to a combat state - 60– 100 s, self-liquidation time - from 8 to 24 hours.

Mines are fired from a minelayer in special cassettes. There are several types of them, and the design of the cassette practically does not differ from one another.

For mines of the PFM-1 (1C) family, KSF-1 cassettes have been developed. Each cassette carries up to 72 PFM-1 anti-personnel mines or 64 PFM-1S mines. The release of mines is provided at a distance of up to 30–35 m from the minelayer in any direction.

For mines PTM-1 (3) are KPTM cassettes. The KPTM-1 cassette is for PTM-1 mines and carries three mines, and the KPTM-3 cassette contains one PTM-3 mine. The maximum mining range using such cassettes is from 30 to 100 m.

The ammunition load of the minelayer, depending on the selected type of mines, can be (options):

- 180 anti-tank mines PTM-3;
- 540 anti-tank mines PTM-1;
- 12960-11520 antipersonnel mines of the PFM-1 type (depending on the type of mine).

At the same time, mixed charging of launching devices is also allowed to create combined explosive barriers.

So, one minelayer in one pass (15-30 minutes) can expose from the PFM-1 mines a single-lane antipersonnel minefield 20-30 meters wide and 3-5 km long. The consumption of mines in this case will be from 2 to 304 units per running kilometer. The probability of hitting the target will be 3 (that is, out of 840 attacking enemy soldiers, three will be blown up, which will disrupt the attack).


I-52 "Flint" during factory tests. The moment of shooting a mine cassette

Specifications I-52


Base chassis: MT-LBu
Weight with a full set of cargo, kg: 16 000

Overall dimensions in transport position, mm:
length - 7 210
width - 2 850
height - 2 200

Overall dimensions in working position, mm:
length - 7 210
width - 3 450
height - 3 300
Crew, person: 2

Maximum transport speed
with a full set of cargo, km / h: 61,5
Cruising in store for fuel, km: 500

Type of minefields to be set:
anti-personnel
anti-tank
mixed

The number of strips (rows) of the minefield,
installed in one pass pcs: 1–2

Travel speed during mining, km / h: from 10 to 40

Types of mines installed: PFM-1, PMF-1S, PTM-1, PTM-3

Method of setting mines: ejection, by shooting from cassettes

Number of containers for mines, pcs .: 2

Number of cassettes in one container, pcs: 90

Rotation angle of containers
in the horizontal plane, city .: 360

Container installation angle
in the vertical plane (elevation angle), city .: up to 50
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    17 October 2021 05: 52
    In any position of the PTM-3 mine, one of the cumulative chutes looks up. For the bottom or the track of the tank is quite enough.

    1. +16
      17 October 2021 06: 26
      It was developed back in the 90s by the Soviet school, and therefore it turned out to be sensible. And the fact that it did not go into the series (there was no money), maybe it was better - they would have done things ...
      1. -3
        17 October 2021 07: 50
        at the beginning of 95g already issued assignments for factories for the repair of MTLB, in the Russian Federation, without the outskirts


        I could not go to the troops for sure - they did not have "troops"
      2. +2
        17 October 2021 11: 08
        And there is also an antires ... is it possible to sow potatoes in a square-nested way using this zag? And then he is alone in the Armed Forces ... "weather" still will not do ... but in agriculture it may do! what
        1. 0
          17 October 2021 11: 13
          Well, how do you plant a bulb if a mine is on self-destruction?
      3. +5
        17 October 2021 13: 31
        Quote: aleks neym_2
        do things

        They've done it anyway
        Baptism of fire, one of the two released I-52 minelayers passed as part of the 12th separate engineering regiment during the hostilities in the East of Ukraine near Mariupol.

        On the roadsides in the suburbs, "petals" were thrown. How many peaceful people have been blown up - who can tell you. The roads leading to the city are just stupid.
        Ukraine signed the Convention on the prohibition of the use, production and storage of anti-personnel mines

        They signed a lot. Conventions 20-plus years old - prevented the installation of dill antipersonnel? Tell the bus in Volnovakha. Or Mariupol, where they were placed IN THE CITY - near bridges or in the port (the port continued to operate on mines), or on city beaches? They signed, yeah! They signed a lot of things - only from the Nazis there is little demand
        1. +1
          17 October 2021 14: 26
          They scattered them at random, now they themselves are undermined ...
    2. +3
      17 October 2021 06: 36
      I didn’t know about this. In our time, there were two half-cylinder mines in the cassette. Anti-tank cumulative. There were also anti-personnel shrapnel with wires. They got up on the records. I don't remember the names anymore. Except PFMki
      1. +1
        17 October 2021 20: 36
        Quote: mmaxx
        ... Nowadays
        There were also anti-personnel shrapnel with wires. They got up on the records. I don't remember the names anymore.
        mine POM-2
        Such ?
        1. +2
          18 October 2021 04: 26
          Such. Seems to be 2 in the cassette. Cool contraption. 4 more long wires were sticking out of it in different directions. Touched - exploded. There, all the mines have self-destructing electronic fuses. That is, they were all temporary minefields. With the expectation of mobile warfare. In general, the single cassettes themselves could simply shoot from the trench from the machine tool. But I have not seen this alive.
        2. +2
          18 October 2021 06: 21
          In general, thanks. Inspired. And then I remembered about YouTube. And climbed in, and looked again already there.
      2. 0
        22 October 2021 19: 25
        there are different, and with a centralized control unit
  2. +2
    17 October 2021 05: 55
    A deadly piece of iron, however.
  3. +3
    17 October 2021 06: 39
    Honestly, it didn't work out a lot ... The MT-LBU is a good car, but it has a great height, why didn't you use the BSh of an ordinary MT-LB? What is difficult, immediately after the engine, cut off the armored hull and make a platform on which these cassettes could be installed, then it would be easier to maintain them and a complex lifting mechanism would not be needed
    Like the German "Scorpion"
    1. +6
      17 October 2021 07: 32
      the purpose of the development of a new minelayer was: to provide protection against destruction by weapons of the crew, minelayer systems, mining installations

      The developer has fulfilled the requirements of the TOR
      1. -8
        17 October 2021 07: 35
        Quote: Zufei
        The developer has fulfilled the requirements of the TOR

        I did it clumsily. When placed on a platform, all this can be easily done the same way, but the design is simpler, lower and lighter
        1. +9
          17 October 2021 09: 58
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Zufei
          The developer has fulfilled the requirements of the TOR

          I did it clumsily. When placed on a platform, all this can be easily done the same way, but the design is simpler, lower and lighter

          ========
          Have you read but did not understand? It was also clearly written there: according to the TK, armor was required protection mine containers! Therefore, they placed it inside the case!
    2. +5
      17 October 2021 07: 37
      Quote: svp67
      What is difficult, immediately after the engine, cut off the armored hull and make a platform on which these cassettes could be installed, then it would be easier to maintain them and a complex lifting mechanism would not be needed


      The task was to hide mine cartridges in an armored capsule. Therefore, they fenced this garden.
      The sides were covered, and the top turned out to be open anyway, although it was partially covered by the upper side of the container.
      Approximately like Tick-G, but almost 30 years earlier.
      1. +1
        17 October 2021 07: 46
        Quote: DDZ57
        The task was to hide mine cartridges in an armored capsule.

        Didn't you have enough mind to protect the cassettes with armor?
        Quote: DDZ57
        Approximately like Tick-G, but almost 30 years earlier.

        Yes, at Kleshch-G, everything is somehow more reasonable. The most dangerous part of the cassettes is covered by the armor of the sides, the cassettes are movable, located so that they are easier to maintain and equip ...




        1. +5
          17 October 2021 08: 16
          Quote: svp67
          Yes, at Kleshch-G, everything is somehow more reasonable. The most dangerous part of the cassettes is covered by the armor of the sides, the cassettes are movable, located so that they are easier to maintain and equip ...

          I already answered, the prototype appeared 30 years earlier.
          It is easier to repair a ready road than to pave a swamp.
          Neither one nor the other is protected from damage from above (for example, Karabakh 2020), although in the Ukrainian version it is easier to strengthen armor protection without prejudice to other operational parameters.
          For both options, the mechanized option of loading containers with cassettes has not been solved (very long time).
          With modular container loading, the Ukrainian version has a shorter time.
          The Russian version has more directions for shooting mines (since more containers).
          That is, the one that the other has its own advantages and disadvantages, and everyone has a right to exist and can develop.
          1. -4
            17 October 2021 08: 57
            The development of these systems in both states saddens me immensely. Antipersonnel mines are a dastardly weapon.
            1. +6
              17 October 2021 11: 08
              Antipersonnel mines are a dastardly weapon.

              The time for the duels of noble knights is long gone.
              1. +4
                17 October 2021 12: 01
                Quote: Aviator_
                The time for the duels of noble knights is long gone.

                And those, like that on the battlefield, did not suffer from particular nobility ...
            2. +2
              17 October 2021 12: 00
              Quote: Zufei
              Antipersonnel mines are a dastardly weapon.

              Do you know samples of the NOBLE?
            3. 0
              18 October 2021 04: 39
              No meaner than poisoning the people with all sorts of diflophos.
              And most importantly, all our development in mines is simply copying the American one.
              1. 0
                18 October 2021 07: 26
                I am aware of BLU-43 and PFM-1. This does not change the fact that the developers of remote antipersonnel mining systems are still "people".
                1. 0
                  18 October 2021 11: 37
                  Not you, so you. Unfortunately, one does not have to count on good human traits in defense against one's own kind. Natural selection works.
          2. 0
            17 October 2021 12: 00
            Quote: DDZ57
            For both options, the mechanized option of loading containers with cassettes has not been solved (very long time).

            In Tick-G, it's easier to solve
            Quote: DDZ57
            Neither one nor the other is protected from damage from above (for example, Karabakh 2020), although in the Ukrainian version it is easier to strengthen armor protection without prejudice to other operational parameters.

            There would be a desire to strengthen the protection from above, it is quite possible.
      2. +5
        17 October 2021 07: 55
        In comparison with Kleshch-G, there is no need to waste time manually opening the lids (there is no such operation).
    3. +2
      17 October 2021 08: 32
      Quote: svp67
      Like the German "Scorpion"

      The German Scorpion does not provide protection against defeat even with small arms.
      It served as a prototype for a Ukrainian vehicle (in the period 1986–88, 300 tracked MZ "Scorpio" were built). It has a shorter load time and can perform other functions besides mining.
      1. -1
        17 October 2021 12: 02
        Quote: DDZ57
        The German Scorpion does not provide protection against defeat even with small arms.

        But all this is not difficult to change, by installing armor on the same containers, and still all this is simpler and easier.
        1. +1
          18 October 2021 12: 12
          Quote: svp67
          But all this is not difficult to change, by installing armor on the same containers, and still all this is simpler and easier.


          Installing body armor on containers will increase the mass of the MH, this will lead to a bunch of problems. In addition to the minelayer, the machine can perform other functions.
          The Ukrainian version has good modernization potential. With the transition to German mine cassettes, it will acquire other functions.
          Designers from Omsk have created a specialized vehicle for the engineering troops - for the present time it is wrong.
    4. +1
      17 October 2021 20: 24
      Quote: svp67
      trim armored hull
      - she is FLOATING belay lol lol so that
  4. -3
    17 October 2021 07: 17
    Unfortunately, as of today, the fate of this project is vague. Most likely, the I-52 minelayer will not find further development, since Ukraine has signed the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Production and Storage of Antipersonnel Mines.

    To whom "unfortunately"? Is there another Ukrainian advertisement on VO?
    Admins, moderators from VO! Wake up! Are you a Russian site or not?
    1. +29
      17 October 2021 07: 36
      hi The author just introduced the technique from opponents. Knowing the enemy is better than not knowing. I'm sure many of us are not aware of this unit.
    2. +3
      17 October 2021 07: 49
      Quote: Nafanya from the couch
      To whom "unfortunately"?

      But because it is not clear, unfortunately, he was finally buried or there will still be attempts to revive
      Quote: Nafanya from the couch
      Is there another Ukrainian advertisement on VO?

      And in what advertising do you see here?
    3. 0
      17 October 2021 08: 26
      Well, you, even the devil has the right to be heard, and here is interesting information, with the resolution of Yaroslavna's crying.
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  6. 0
    17 October 2021 08: 47
    Lads! Who is with Donbass? Talking to the same point, the Ukrainian Armed Forces minelay I-52 has been trapped in Mariupol! Knowing nothing?
    1. +1
      18 October 2021 04: 47
      Most likely, as usual. We tried it away from the front. Shot anywhere. Half of the cassettes did not work. Mined xs that. Not mapped. Then the brothers went for moonshine. They tore off the hanging one. They spat. Something self-destructed itself. It seems that there is self-destruction for 2-4 days. How long do the batteries live there? ...
      And maybe advertising. They fired training. And for everything else, the expiration dates have passed.
  7. 0
    18 October 2021 10: 45
    Only, in my opinion, Koryukovo, not Kryukovo.
  8. 0
    8 December 2021 21: 12
    In the army, he was a UR-77 mechanic on the basis of MT-LB, we also had tracked minelayers with a plow