A special combat vehicle based on the UAZ car was created in Lugansk

An off-road vehicle produced by the Ulyanovsk Automobile Plant was successfully modernized in Donbass. An original combat vehicle based on the UAZ-3151 vehicle was created in Lugansk.

It is reported "Lugansk Information Center" (FACE).

The development of Luhansk engineers was demonstrated at demonstration performances in honor of the seventh anniversary of the founding of the People's Militia of the LPR. This date is celebrated annually on October 7th.

An unusual machine-gun mount was installed on the UAZ SUV, consisting of four Kalashnikov machine guns of 7,62 mm caliber.

In the process of modernization, the rear of the car was lengthened, which made it possible to make a convenient platform for installing various types of weapons. The quadruple machine-gun mount allows for high-density fire to destroy enemy manpower. In addition, light armor was installed on the sides of the car to protect the crew. The roof of the SUV in the modernized version has become metal. To create camouflage smoke screens, the SUV was equipped with grenade launchers.

In the LPR and earlier, UAZs were altered for the needs of the People's Militia. For example, at one of the parades last year, an off-road vehicle with a heavy machine gun DShK and ATGM "Konkurs" and "Fagot" was demonstrated.

Comments

[Keyser soze]

And what .. going? Rides ... Shoots? Shoots ... then everything works fine ...

[hagen]

Quote: Keyser Soze

And what .. going? Rides ... Shoots? Shoots ... then everything works fine ...

Everything will be fine when with the help of this "tachanka" any tactical tasks will be actually performed with acceptable success.

[alex neym_2]

A tachanka is like a tachanka - the Arabs NURS manage to put on gelding pick-ups and it’s not bad ... I mean, as they say, "the need for invention is wise," but our people are not deprived of imagination and ingenuity - we are not mattress mats ...

[svp67]

Quote: Hagen

tactical tasks

Judging by the sight, this is an anti-aircraft gun, and the question is against what air targets is it intended? What are they going to shoot down with it? The range of the propeller cartridge bullet, for the current conditions, is not any, why not NSVT, but PKT? I blinded him from what was?
It used to be cooler ...

[URAL72]

Judging by the sight, this is an anti-aircraft gun "

Considering that there are no areas on the front line that are not shot by the APU from large-caliber machine guns, SPG, ATGM, mortars, there is nothing to do on the front end of this machine. But on the UAV, it will do very well. He himself once with the help of a spear from a felled tree and RMB removed one. The AK-74 is much more difficult. And four barrels are generally good.

[svp67]

Quote: URAL72

But on the UAV, it will do very well. Once he himself, with the help of a spear from a felled tree and RMB, took one off.

It depends on which UAV to shoot, if it's the size of an elephant, then yes, it will be easy to shoot it down from this quad setup, but it's not a fact for a small, "penny" type of copter. PC You have verified and shot clearly along the line of the bullet's flight, where the line of the barrel coincides with the line of sight, but such multi-barreled ones are verified and aimed differently and how it was done on this installation, not me, you do not know at what distance they chose the point of convergence , 400 or 600 meters? So a small copter can slip between the "trickles"

[Barberry25]

well, most likely we are talking about the fight against UAVs

[Avior]

Purely visually, there is an impression that the posterior spine is overloaded, and that the load is naturally shifted back
It would be more logical not to lengthen the rear, but to remove the rear seats - but this way the design will become much more complicated.

[poquello]

Quote: Avior

Purely visually, there is an impression that the posterior spine is overloaded, which is natural

what is it? )))))))))) he has a standard 800kg

[Avior]

It has a non-standard elongated rear part, which increases the load on the rear axle due to the increased lever arm of the load application point, due to which the weight distribution along the axles is disturbed.
In addition, they write, light armor was installed on the side of the car to protect the crew.

[poquello]

Quote: Avior

It has a non-standard elongated rear part, which increases the load on the rear axle due to the increased lever arm of the load application point, due to which the weight distribution along the axles is disturbed.
In addition, they write, light armor was installed on the side of the car to protect the crew.

Here is an empty UAZ, where is the visual difference? ))))))))))))

[Avior]

In the increased load on the rear axle, for which, probably, it was necessary to handicraftly cut the rear wheel arch to a great depth along with the threshold in the rear.
However, you may not have seen this either.

[Katanikotael]

There, handicraft booking is welded, the frame there is the same as on the farmer, so +/- meter does not solve anything. Add a couple more strips to the springs and it will ride no worse than a goat.

[poquello]

Quote: Katanikotael

Add a couple more strips to the springs and it will ride no worse than a goat.

what kind of spring is now also unknown (army bands have more), and in general, yes, you can practically hang out

[poquello]

Quote: Avior

In the increased load on the rear axle, for which, probably, it was necessary to handicraftly cut the rear wheel arch to a great depth along with the threshold in the rear.
However, you may not have seen this either.

the suspension travel is 200mm, we look at the difference from the axis horizon to the threshold horizon, there is a maximum of 10cm, which is natural because the weight of the balcony with a quadric has been added, the wing outline is cut off - this is 3-4cm, and since the gap between the wheel and the cut is clearly present - therefore they made it for the convenience of replacing the wheel and subsidence when driving)

[svp67]

Quote: Avior

and remove the rear seats, but this will greatly complicate the design.

No, there is a possibility there.

[poquello]

Quote: svp67

Quote: Avior

and remove the rear seats, but this will greatly complicate the design.

No, there is a possibility there.

yes you sho, it's fiction and cartoons

[vladcub]

Zhenya, naturally it must go and shoot

[private person]

And what .. going? Rides ... Shoots? Shoots ... then everything works fine ...

As they say, the need for invention is cunning.

[Igoresha]

it is difficult to imagine why such a thing is needed, most likely against homemade drones

[sedoj]

Quote: Igoresha

it's hard to imagine why such a thing is needed

I also thought about it. The unit was then created, but for what tasks? I do not think that the Ukrainians will attack in a chain. Quadruple installation. The consumption of cartridges is terrifying. What for?

[sedoj]

And what, the word x about x about l is prohibited on the site? The automaton is replaced by "Ukrainians".

[Rusticolus]

And what, the word x about x about l is prohibited on the site? The automaton is replaced by "Ukrainians". belay

The word Xoxol is not forbidden. Well, that is forbidden, but another word. But it is better not to abuse this either, otherwise the administrators may be offended. You all the same wrote at least something. In general, think in the right direction.

[serg.shishkov2015]

My best friend is Ukrainian! have known each other for 47 years! taught his daughter from his third marriage! Families were friends! I will designate his nationality with this word, even with that! What will change from this?

[venik]

Quote: Igoresha

it is difficult to imagine why such a thing is needed, most likely against homemade drones

========
And why do we need these "jihadmobiles" or "carts" at all:

which for some reason THOUSAND are used in BW and in Africa?
And why, even in the Russian Army, have they thought about "tachanki" ?:

Maybe because in a low-intensity database these machines are not so bad (at least - according to the criterion "cost / effectiveness")?
Of course, such machines are extremely vulnerable, even for small arms ... But imagine that during the battle, such a "craft" suddenly jumped out at YOU and began to water from 4 RPK ... ? I doubt it very much ...
Of course, the UAZ is not the most suitable car for these purposes .... But the Luhansk guys now "have no time for fat"! So they work on the principle: "I blinded you out of that what happened!"......

[militarist63]

But imagine that in the course of the battle such a "hand-made article" suddenly jumped out on YOU and began to water from 4 RPK ...

And what does the PKK have to do with it ?! In fact, there are 4 PCTs! ...

[venik]

Quote: militarist63

And what does the PKK have to do with it ?! wink Actually there are 4 PKT! ...

=======
What's the difference in the FIG, from WHAT you will be "watered" - from the PKK or PKT? Just gave it as an example!

[poquello]

straight pvshnaya version of the Great Patriotic War, tachanka today

[vladcub]

I thought about it myself. Only then they used a machine gun of the system: "Maxim"

[serg.shishkov2015]

And * Maxims *, and DA-2, and PV-1! and our pilots also set the MG-15 from the Fritzes they shot down as anti-aircraft! and even on armored trains - up to UBT and diesel fuel!

[vladcub]

Pokryshkin says that the resourceful foreman removed the ShKAS machine gun from the broken "donkey" (I-16) and adapted it as an air defense device. He managed to shoot down 1 German plane

[serg.shishkov2015]

I have already mentioned on VO this notebook of mine with a VERY conditional name * Infantry weapons of the Red Army and irregular units of 1941-1945 *, in it a separate chapter - Air defense equipment, which contains both regular ZPU and various homemade products, including PU RS- 82 ZPU based on captured machine guns. I found a lot in different sources, and with ShKAS too, I saw a couple of photos of DA-2 as an air defense means of an armored train

[Eug]

Shaitan is an arba ... if only it does not break.

[nPuBaTuP]

So this is a UAZ, there is nothing to break a priori, and what has been unscrewed can be screwed back with a hammer ...

[The leader of the Redskins]

Another "shushpanzer" of this unnecessary war. With all the ensuing disadvantages, but in a bravura "wrapper", because it is not dill.

[Catfish]

Yes, "Sam, sand is not an important substitute for oats", it needs a real technique, and not something that naked Arabs use in their desert. All this is sad.

[The leader of the Redskins]

Well, sane people got it right. And the turbopatriots continue to rejoice at the single half-layouts, half-layouts. How many were there? "Donchanka", "snowflake" ... And also a tram, a bus ... This is a miracle ...

[alavrin]

This is at the extreme. And I would not show this craft after the Ukrainian wunderwaffe ...

[BISMARCK94]

cool, they invented the guntruck)

[75 Sergey]

And it was impossible to do it in the base Or did they need seats?

[Avior]

The body would have to be completely redone to provide rigidity, while leaving the entire rear section completely open from above, the rigidity does not increase in any way. And the wheel arches would get in the way of shooting. Easier to do from scratch.
Shifting the load back is also a bad idea. Simpler, but the rear axle is overloaded. It will do for a parade, but how long does it actually take and what traffic will it be?

[Rusticolus]

There is no need to redo anything there. At the UAZ, the rigidity at the top is already provided by the tube frame. What prevents it from simply lowering it by a meter and thickening it to preserve the circuit? And he will not interfere with anything. Apparently the goal was really, to keep the second row. Causes? Apparently they considered that the crew of the driver and the gunner was insufficient. And to drive the arrow all the time "with a breeze" as it is not particularly.

[Avior]

The frame will interfere with the shooting of the machine gunner, as well as the wheel arches, next to which the machine gun will stand if you move it forward

[Rusticolus]

The frame can be easily made lower by reinforcing it accordingly. Here are the arches yes. Raising the floor level - to get the already elevated center of gravity, due to the installation of machine guns and armor. In other matters, in this case, it is very likely that this is exactly what has already been done.

[Avior]

If the frame is made lower, it will interfere with the movement of the machine gunner, he also needs a circular fire or something close to it
This means that you need to lower it down completely - in this case, you will need to strengthen the thickness and the weight of the frame, and raise the floor line above the wheel arches

[Rusticolus]

A lowered frame in any case will interfere less than a high one. About the thickness, most likely it will be so, it is unlikely that titanium or magnesium alloy will be used there. And this is an increase in weight and load. The same is with the floor, where it is already so elevated that it is not good to wipe. In general, it could have been done better, but they did it as best they could.

[for]

That's where to put it!

[venik]

Quote: for

That's where to put it!

=======
And by the way - YES !!! Especially - the second option - the very thing! Even the ZU-23-2, or the twin "Cliff" can be driven in !!!

[for]

Quote: venik

paired "Cliff" can be entangled

From a "loaf" in general, like a BZHRK, you can make

[Nikolaevich I]

A special combat vehicle based on the UAZ car was created in Lugansk Well, special ... not special ... But I still like such DPR shushpants like "Scarab" and "Razduplator"!

[for]

Not an infantryman, but

The quadruple machine-gun mount allows high-density fire to destroy enemy manpower.

It seems to me that it is not suitable for manpower.

[tochila]

Shaitan arba !!!!

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

This is an anti-aircraft quadruple machine gun mount.

I suppose for UAV shooting.

Idea from here -

[Avior]

Sorry, don't tell me, but what kind of photo do you have? It seems that I had seen him before, but only now I looked closely and thought.
A machine gunner in a strange uniform with a garrison cap, an incomprehensible jacket, or a pea coat with some kind of collar, and strange boots, as if large in size in the area of ​​the feet?
The machine-gun mount does not have a rear sighting scope, it seems, it is just being photographed, in this form it is impossible to aim, probably.
And if the plane - the target flies to the right, then the machine gunner may fall from the body, his left leg is already on the edge.
Can you tell me what kind of photo it is? And what are the red arrows?

[Rusticolus]

what is this photo? And what are the red arrows?

I think the arrows point to some inconsistencies. The TT of a fighter in the rank is hardly higher than a sergeant. Non-standard sighting devices. Flow cooling system

[Avior]

The cooling system is quite standard for the stationary Maxim.
In the holster, I think, more a revolver than a TT, the revolver has a narrow part in the area of ​​the end of the barrel, and the TT is much wider

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Photo from the net, just as an illustration.

[saygon66]

Yes, it’s not like a German ... A holster under the P08, lower pockets on the jacket, a tunic and trousers, it looks like cloth ... And this, perhaps, is not a collar, but shoulder rests. And the boots are a trophy tarpaulin ..

[Avior]

really similar. And the holster is very similar
On a close-up, the boots generally look like rubber.
And the rear sight is visible

and shoulder pads, not a collar

[saygon66]

The tape is empty .... we fought to the last.

[Rusticolus]

Shilka won, the same was originally a purely anti-aircraft complex. But as practice has shown, it works quite well in terms of manpower. So, not everything here is unambiguous.

[Avior]

Photo of installation on the machine

[Comrade Kim]

Their main problem now is Bender's drones.
Bastards hunt for everything that moves.
Fascist vultures, military or civilian, do not disassemble.
Politicians got bogged down in Minsk masturbation, instead of helping Novorossia in the fight against drones.
The militia, as in 1941, sniffs at them from the AKM and SKS, but without much success.
Soon the instructors, sent by the best friend of our Leader, will train the Banderlog on Bayraktar, it will be very bad on the front end, and you will not envy the civilians in the gray zone.
Lavrov, as always, will be deeply concerned, Zakharova will show miracles of verbiage, and the people will be left alone against the army of Ukronazis trained by the Turks, Jews and Americans.
PS
Try to disable enemy UAVs with the prodigy missile prodigy. But this thing is very expensive (it costs like one Rublev's larva to go to the SPA).

https://t.me/grey_zone/10697

[storm]

God grant that they do not have to really fight on these carts.

[Aurel]

Russian jihadmobile.

[Archon]

Looks dangerous to the quad machine gun user.

[Zomanus]

Hmm, everyone made fun of such Ukroprom crafts ... Is that there, they attached a sight for an anti-aircraft machine gun? Well, that's HZ, to be honest. It may work against primitive drones, but at the expense of the rest it is not a fact.

[Sergey3]

How many couch critics here are divorced! In Luhansk, in the conditions of daily hostilities, it is probably better to know in what form they need weapons. It is necessary to take into account the real possibilities of the Lugansk cartridge plant. Presumably, there are cartridges for this machine gun. The release of cartridges was established back in 2016, for automatic weapons of 5,45 mm, 7,62 mm and 9 mm caliber.

[zxc15682]

The dickhead looks like a dickhead and shoots like a dickhead. Only the UAZ was spoiled.