Soyuz-2.1a launch vehicle with a "kino crew" launched from Baikonur to the ISS

251

Russia sent the world's first "cinema crew" into space. The Soyuz-2.1a launch vehicle was launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome and delivered the Soyuz MS-19 manned spacecraft into orbit.

The launch vehicle was launched from the 31st site of the Baikonur cosmodrome at 11:55 Moscow time. time. in the normal mode and after the estimated time, launched the Soyuz MS-19 manned spacecraft into orbit. The spacecraft separated from the third stage of the rocket and began to move to the ISS in a two-turn scheme. The flight to the station will take approximately 3 hours and 17 minutes, docking will take place automatically. The ship will dock to the Russian module Rassvet. The hatches are scheduled to open at 17:05.



A crew of only one professional cosmonaut is flying to the ISS on board Soyuz - crew commander Anton Shkaplerov. Two other crew members, actress Yulia Peresild and director Klim Shipenko, went into orbit to shoot the film "Challenge" about a woman doctor who flew into orbit to save the life of an astronaut. By the way, the Russian ISS crew, consisting of cosmonauts Oleg Novitsky and Peter Dubrov, will also take part in the filming. At the moment, judging by the reports, Shipenko and Peresild feel fine.


The film crew will spend 12 days on the ISS, after which they will go to Earth on the Soyuz MS-18 spacecraft together with Oleg Novitsky, who will be replaced in orbit by Anton Shkaplerov. The remaining crew will spend another 174 days on the ISS.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    251 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +19
      5 October 2021 12: 59
      Show must go on ...
      1. +21
        5 October 2021 13: 02
        "Ponya-e-rode" ...
        1. -19
          5 October 2021 13: 48
          Now it will start, they will start shooting massively films in space, instead of building their new space station! am
          1. -8
            5 October 2021 13: 52
            This will be called "economic efficiency")))
            1. +10
              5 October 2021 15: 06
              You need to build your own station.
              We need to tie up with the ISS.
              Either holes are drilled in the body, or it is not clear how they appear.
              1. +2
                5 October 2021 18: 20
                During the existence of the Mir station, such garbage has never been with holes! Yes No. hi
                1. 0
                  6 October 2021 11: 31
                  Quote: keeper03
                  During the existence of the Mir station, such garbage has never been with holes! Yes No. hi

                  And "Peace" and "Salute"
          2. +4
            5 October 2021 13: 54
            Quote: Thrifty
            Now it will start, they will start shooting massively films in space, instead of building their new space station!

            PR elevated to the level of absurdity already looks comical.
            It remains for Baragozin to launch a song and dance ensemble into space and record a gramophone record there.
            1. -5
              5 October 2021 14: 22
              Quote: Stroporez
              It remains for Baragozin to launch a song and dance ensemble into space and record a gramophone record there.


              Enemies always have a burning sensation with our successes. laughing We will definitely dance and sing.
            2. -2
              5 October 2021 14: 24
              In general, expected.
              Russia has already won brilliant victories on all space fronts.
              It's time to shout "Urrrya! Finally, we will wipe our nose to the Chinese, mattress toppers and personally to Elon Musk!"
              We are the first in space again! True, for some reason, it is still impossible to replace kerosene stoves with new modern rocket engines with a new type of fuel, create a reusable spacecraft, a reusable carrier stage, or even give birth to a superheavy concept, but in the field of ballet, sorry, cinema we are again ahead of the rest of the world!
              1. 0
                5 October 2021 17: 19
                It looks like you are right, Musk strongly interferes with Mr. Rogozin's sleep. The car, you know, launched into space. And is it worse? It is also necessary to do something senseless in response. fellow
                Although to the question ".. it is worse .." there is a ready answer: "than Musk."
                1. 0
                  6 October 2021 21: 19
                  Quote: volodimer
                  It is also necessary to do something senseless in response.

                  Quite right! A senseless "event" with a "near-zero" result!
              2. -2
                5 October 2021 19: 19
                Quote: Cosm22
                We are the first in space again! True, for some reason, it is still impossible to replace kerosene stoves with new modern rocket engines with a new type of fuel, create a reusable spacecraft, a reusable carrier stage, or even give birth to a superheavy concept, but in the field of ballet, sorry, cinema we are again ahead of the rest of the world!

                All that you have listed, we are already creating, something at the design stage, something at the stage of testing individual elements. We will have a returnable stage that can be used up to 100 times, but do not tell me how much you can use the American stage? That too. Aren't you tired of singing the same record, all the scammers and whiners? I wonder when we will have everything in hardware, how will you sing then?
                1. +6
                  5 October 2021 21: 19
                  I agree. "maybe it will be possible 100 times someday" much cooler than "already flew only 10 times"
                2. +2
                  5 October 2021 21: 55
                  I will give you a hint. Bye on practice more than one first step of Falcon has made 10 successful landings and starts. A proven and lethal fact. What is the further potential of the steps already used - time and practice will show.
                  Unlike the mythical Russian carrier, which, allegedly, will also be able to land the first stage. How to plant, on what engines - a hooray-patriot is not interested. He has enough sweet molasses in his ears from Mr. Rogozin.
                  The main thing is that something "will definitely appear" ... "it will be possible" ... "we will do" ... "we will build" ... "we will design" ... someday ... somewhere ... Stay hurray -patriot is constantly in the future tense - his normal state. He is unable to make the simplest analysis of the situation, get acquainted with the facts, outline the perspective, forecast.
                  So, tales about a hundred plantings can be told to kids in kindergarten. Adequate people know that reusability in Roskosmos is dull. For the reason that, in principle, it is impossible to make a reusable first stage on the Glushko engine line. With no modification. Neither with RD-170, nor 180, nor 191. For the simple reason that these engines are too heavy and oversized. It is impossible to fit the required number of them into the existing architecture of CWs because of the well-known railway dimensions of 4,1 m. Plus, they do not have the required throttling parameters. They are powerful enough, but this is the only advantage. It will not be possible to reserve a start-landing for them. As for the price, it is cosmic.
                  And there are no new engines. Neither methane nor hydrogen. There is not even a purely Russian-made kerosene stove. Except for RD-0124, but it goes to the second stage of A-5.
                  What will this storaze step take off and land on? On engines from a distant tomorrow?
                  Like children ... They believe in all nonsense. Why, it's not enough to make a reusable step. The carrier needs to withstand the competition in the market. And where and with what will Musk be by the time Roscosmos gives birth to its creation? And NASA? A EKA? Who will need this media? From a distant tomorrow, which will become obsolete already at the design stage? Spoon road for dinner.
                  1. 0
                    6 October 2021 21: 39
                    Quote: Cosm22
                    What will this storaze step take off and land on? On engines from a distant tomorrow?
                    Like children ... They believe in all nonsense. Why, it's not enough to make a reusable step. The carrier needs to withstand the competition in the market. And where and with what will Musk be by the time Roscosmos gives birth to its creation? And NASA? A EKA? Who will need this media? From a distant tomorrow, which will become obsolete already at the design stage? Spoon road for dinner.

                    Everything is clear with you, you are one of those people who whine and whine.
                    Musk is just a publicized scarecrow and that's it, but the real cost of his missiles, i.e. flights are not as cheap as advertised.
                    Roskosmos has made presentations not long ago and there are plans for real breakthrough technologies, time will pass and everything will be, I will see how then you sing.
            3. +7
              5 October 2021 14: 26
              Interestingly, and who prepares the banquet? Goskino? Is computer graphics not in vogue? It would be better if sick children were given an operation.
              1. +11
                5 October 2021 14: 45
                At whose expense the banquet is an extremely interesting question! How is Mr. Shipenko's future film masterpiece financed?
                We read an excerpt from the letter sent by Rogozin and Ernst to the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin on 25.01.2025/XNUMX/XNUMX:
                "The organizer of the targeted work will be a subsidiary of the State Corporation Roscosmos - JSC Glavkosmos, which is an industry operator of foreign economic activity and space tourism, due to which general space training of participants under a reduced program and the manufacture of flight equipment, including spacesuits, will be financed to carry out the targeted work.
                The rest of the main funding is planned to be carried out within the framework of the current volumes of the Federal Space Program of Russia for 2016-2025 (launch missions in 2021).
                The meaning of the phrase "core funding"It is not even necessary to explain to a fifth-grader. As well as what exactly is included in this concept.
                These are the things ... The project is essentially financed almost entirely from the funds of the FKP 2016-2025. And where does the money come from to the FKP? Yes, the stump is clear from the state budget. And the budget, in turn, is filled, including from the taxpayer's pocket. Whom no one asked whether he needed this cinema circus or not. For it was said by the classic of Marxism: of all the arts, cinema is the most important for us. Therefore, the Russian taxpayer is simply obliged to silently and meekly pay for this banquet.
                The whole essence of this feint with the ears of Roscosmos was already formulated before me: "Instead of finding money, making an additional ship, they took a ship under the federal space program, paid for by the government, on which professional cosmonauts were supposed to fly."
                A curtain.
                1. +3
                  5 October 2021 18: 22
                  I will tell you a great secret! The state exists at the expense of taxpayers! wassat Yes
            4. +1
              5 October 2021 21: 39
              Quote: Stroporez
              It remains for Baragozin to launch a song and dance ensemble into space and record a gramophone record there.

              Young people need some kind of new horizons. The generation of the 90s grew up under the dastardly speeches of the ex. Communists Gorbachev, Yakovlev, Kuchma, Shevardnadze, Yeltsin and many other Komsomol leaders, under the bandit (comm. figures) showdown and criminal pop music and bush legs .. 2000s Chechnya, the war for the integrity of Russia, now it's time to raise your head and remember now other values. “Of all the arts, cinema is the most important for us” (V. I. Lenin).That is according to the behests of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, a film about space is being shot ... Agree, this is better than house -2?
              1. +2
                6 October 2021 02: 38
                Quote: 30 vis
                "Of all the arts, cinema is the most important for us"

                And a circus. And it is noteworthy that this mission unites both of these most important arts.
                1. +2
                  6 October 2021 09: 41
                  Quote: military_cat
                  Quote: 30 vis
                  "Of all the arts, cinema is the most important for us"

                  And a circus. And it is noteworthy that this mission unites both of these most important arts.

                  Circus to this quote by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, about the importance of cinema for the people, dragged all sorts of different Western "friends" of Russia, "smart people". However, as well as to the whole history of Russia.
              2. -1
                6 October 2021 17: 39
                Tinsel - both.
              3. 0
                6 October 2021 21: 22
                Quote: 30 vis
                Agree, this is better than house -2?

                I disagree! "Better" - "House-2 in Space"!
                1. 0
                  7 October 2021 15: 08
                  Quote: Nikolaevich I
                  Quote: 30 vis
                  Agree, this is better than house -2?

                  I disagree! "Better" - "House-2 in Space"!

                  Do you propose to shoot porn in space? Let's go for it!
                  1. 0
                    7 October 2021 16: 13
                    I do not propose and did not intend to propose ... I do not know where such a friction appeared in your head ... but the psychoanalyst will be able to say more precisely ... In any case, if a "pop from space" appears; then it's not my fault! I give a tooth! bully
                    1. 0
                      7 October 2021 18: 47
                      Quote: Nikolaevich I
                      In any case, if a "ponyha from space" appears; then it's not my fault! I give a tooth!

                      Teeth are now extremely expensive pleasure .... Dentists thrive .. Take care of your teeth! drinks
          3. +5
            5 October 2021 14: 54
            Quote: Thrifty
            Now it will start, they will start shooting massively films in space, instead of building their new space station! am

            ========
            I still do not understand ..... What, Rogozin and his son have nothing else to do? Maybe it's time to "define" them, so for 25 years, if not for "life"?
            Dur-r-r-dom! request am angry
          4. 0
            6 October 2021 03: 16
            Precisely, as if it is impossible to shoot films at Mosfilm (or where else) (the same fantasy, for example), it is absolutely necessary to send some Peresild into orbit ?! Hollywood quietly without twitching a whole lunar epic shot right on Earth ...
            True, there was information about a type of tacit competition with the Stars and Stripes for the championship in the filming of a film in space. If this turns out to be true, then there are not even words (even obscene ones) how to call all this ?! Although Roskosmos also delivers / brings amers for money, why not cut dough from filmmakers (forgive the abusive slang). The president of Roskosmos recently cut appetites, so Rogozin immediately launched Plan B into space, just what a go-getter.
            1. 0
              6 October 2021 15: 44
              yes, because personally you would have yelled about "how dare you take the Americans to shoot a movie on the ISS, it would be better if ours made the film themselves" .. always disgruntled whining experts
        2. -4
          5 October 2021 14: 04
          Flyer .... "Ponya-e-rode" ..

          Well, they don't like Russian surnames on TV today, especially on Channel One. Moreover, there are few men there. They prefer "blue". Therefore, Ernst liked the Estonian surname - Peresild, it's cool. No one
          there Tereshkova, Ivanova, Petrova. hi
          1. +4
            5 October 2021 21: 48
            Quote: askort154
            Estonian surname - Peresild, that's cool.

            Peresild's grandfather moved to Pskov. She has Est. bloods one fourth ... Leave the measurement of skulls to one German painter who did not take place! Don't be like him.
            1. -3
              6 October 2021 15: 29
              We are not, but who is she like ??? !!!
              1. -1
                6 October 2021 21: 14
                What, minusers, is she so fond of you?
        3. -3
          5 October 2021 22: 18
          Quote: Letun
          "Ponya-e-rode" ...

          This is how they were greeted on the ISS. laughing
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        4. +4
          6 October 2021 00: 21
          May God give them a safe return!
      2. +1
        5 October 2021 13: 03
        Indeed, it is more profitable and faster to shoot a movie than to do real work - everything in the cinema will be cool and heroic there. And the film distribution will beat back the money.
        I can imagine what the advertisement will be like - the first feature film shot in a real spaceship and under real weightlessness. laughing
        1. +7
          5 October 2021 13: 05
          film distribution will not be taken away, the budget will be taken away ...
          1. +23
            5 October 2021 13: 16
            Quote: faiver
            film distribution will not be taken away, the budget will be taken away ...

            The joke was remembered.
            - We need to clean the city square. Two million have been allocated for this. Here are two Tajiks.
            - Will they clean the area?
            - They will launder two million.
          2. -1
            5 October 2021 13: 21
            Quote: faiver
            film distribution will not be taken away, the budget will be taken away ...

            This is because the robot Fedor was not taken)))
          3. +1
            5 October 2021 13: 49
            Don't confuse your wool with the state one)))))
        2. 0
          5 October 2021 14: 28
          And fail at the box office. With a bang.
          Now, if Mikhalkov flew ... an oscar would be provided (sarcasm). wassat
          1. 0
            5 October 2021 17: 08
            It would be better if Rogozin himself flew to the ISS - he raised his person at least a little prestige.
            1. +1
              6 October 2021 22: 10
              Quote: Vadim237
              It would be better if Rogozin himself flew to the ISS - he raised his person at least a little prestige.

              So we do not yet have a super-heavy carrier ...
              run?
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +4
          5 October 2021 14: 33
          Um ... About the first feature film ...
          He's not the first to start. In the Soviet Union, a similar attempt was made four decades ago.
          Secondly, after the deafening announcement of this film masterpiece, it suddenly became clear that the "film shot in space" would be reduced to 35-40 minutes of individual episodes filmed in space. For these three or four dozen minutes, it turns out, it is necessary to drive the planned carrier into space at the expense of taxpayers, while breaking the approved schedule of the sequence of flights of professional cosmonauts.
          1. +4
            5 October 2021 16: 24
            Quote: Cosm22
            secondly, after the deafening announcement of this film masterpiece, it suddenly became clear that the "film shot in space" would be reduced to 35-40 minutes of individual episodes filmed in space. For these three or four dozen minutes, it turns out, it is necessary to drive the planned carrier into space at the expense of taxpayers, while breaking the approved schedule of the sequence of flights of professional cosmonauts.

            Comrade, there is another piquant moment in this story.
            The content for the 1st channel is provided by the "National Media Group" under the leadership and management of a certain Mrs. Kabaeva. The holding includes Channel Five, Channel One, REN TV channel, Izvestia newspaper, Russian News Service radio station, Art Pictures Vision LLC, and Metro-Petersburg. Now "National Media Group" has acquired 25% of CJSC "Sport-Express", which will allow it to enter a new market of sports media that has not yet been mastered. Kabayeva became the chairman of the board of directors of the publication.
            In addition, thanks to the law on media, according to which foreigners cannot own more than 20% in media companies since 2016, NMG acquired 11 TV channels of the American television broadcaster Discovery, 12 Russian-language versions of Viasat TV channels and three TV channels of the Turner group, thereby becoming the owner significant audience share of the Pay TV market in Russia.
            This holding is funded by such billionaires and friends of a friend as the Kovalchuk, Timchenko, and through gaspr and the state.
            1. +6
              5 October 2021 17: 10
              Curious ... But understandable. The presence of the "First".
              Roscosmos began squandering targeted money for Rogozin's movie show-offs only because the Russian person has nothing more to show. He just got bored of the royal seven starts. And there is nothing more to show. So we found a way out. Not an easy start - cinematic! Not huhry-muhry. And with such media support ...
              1. +4
                5 October 2021 17: 18
                Quote: Cosm22
                Roscosmos began squandering targeted money for Rogozin's movie show-offs only because the Russian person has nothing more to show.

                Absolutely right! They live and work under the motto:
                "If there are no real cases,
                Call the PR department "
                By the way, the baragozins were haunted by Musk's successes, not only technical, but also in the field of public relations. laughing
                And here the PR department gave it to the mountain, and we ..., and we ... not only tourists, but also film on a Chinese smartphone. wassat
                It is simply impossible to look at what is happening in the country without humor, the mind can not stand it.
              2. -9
                5 October 2021 20: 40
                And there is nothing more to show. So we found a way out. Not an easy start - cinematic!

                Aha-ahah notably burns with you))))
                You here for half a year convinced us all here that Roscosmos is deader than dead, and here is such a media surprise that Musk did not think of.
                aha-ahah))))
                1. +1
                  5 October 2021 22: 01
                  It would be nice to read all my comments. It will become clear what Musk thought of, and where he got the idea for the film in Rogozin's orbit.
          2. +4
            5 October 2021 23: 45
            For these three or four dozen minutes, it turns out, it is necessary to drive the planned carrier into space at the expense of taxpayers, while breaking the approved schedule of the sequence of flights of professional cosmonauts.

            I still saw the training of this crew, after Klim got into the main crew, the crown slid down on his ears, he was a very unpleasant person, but he pissed too much, because he did not pass in height, he was approved by an additional resolution. Persild is more sane, but it is humanly pity for the understudies, very good and simple guys wanted to fly and understood that this was not entirely correct, they even openly admitted that the astronauts hate them because of the change in the schedule, they had been preparing for years, and here Klim and Persild unexpectedly bolt from the shelf. But what is to me? I left cosmonautics and left the country: / is this nonsense on all fronts, do I need it?
        4. 0
          6 October 2021 15: 45
          and what is so bad about filming a film? under the same brand, one can say “why was Gagarin sent into space?”
          1. -1
            6 October 2021 22: 20
            Quote: Barberry25
            what's so bad about filming a movie

            Have you watched the Martian? And Gravity? How filmed! Chic! And not for the taxpayer's set. And they didn't drive the ship to Mars ...
      3. +1
        5 October 2021 13: 04
        Well, if it's a good thing, why not?
        1. +13
          5 October 2021 13: 05
          You know, I think there are probably more pressing tasks compared to skating actors into space ... Although, of course, it's not for me to solve ...
          1. 0
            5 October 2021 13: 07
            Yeah, for example, build a Sputnik city ... lol
            1. 0
              5 October 2021 13: 08
              Yeah, for example build a Sputnik city

              I did not say that. Do not attribute to me that which was not.
              1. -2
                5 October 2021 13: 11
                Why are you so worried? Comrade Major writes down all the moves, so they won't assign anything too much to you bully
                1. 0
                  5 October 2021 13: 13
                  I'm not worried. Just answered as I think.
            2. -4
              5 October 2021 17: 09
              As if you are forced to build this city.
          2. +4
            5 October 2021 13: 16
            Quote: Nexcom
            there are probably more pressing tasks compared to skating actors into space ...

            Probably all scientific research has been completed. Now you can use the ISS even as a hotel for tourists, even as a film set.
            1. 0
              5 October 2021 13: 18
              Or maybe so ...
              1. +5
                5 October 2021 14: 24
                Quote: Nexcom
                Or maybe so ...


                Can not. The current ISS crew has their own interesting scientific program for the next six months and 8 exits.
            2. -7
              5 October 2021 13: 51
              even as a hotel for, at least as a
              brothel.
              sex in zero gravity. taxi shuttles will get tired of hauling back and forth
          3. -21
            5 October 2021 13: 23
            Quote: Nexcom
            You know, I think there are probably more pressing tasks compared to skating actors into space ...

            So "skating" at the expense of "Channel One", the state has nothing to do with this project
            1. +19
              5 October 2021 13: 34
              The RF Ministry of Finance proposed to increase subsidies from the Russian budget for the production and purchase of content from federal TV channels. Four TV channels - VGTRK, Channel One, NTV and RT - will receive 148 billion rubles in three years from taxpayers' money.
              Such information is contained on the official website of regulatory legal acts in Appendix 11 to the bill "On the federal budget for 2020 and for the planning period of 2021 and 2022".
              -So "skating" at the expense of "Channel One", the state has nothing to do with this project - nu-nu. hi
              1. -17
                5 October 2021 13: 37
                So channels get much more for advertising.
                1. +11
                  5 October 2021 14: 04
                  And why then takes money from the budget? After all, he does not refuse.
                  1. -5
                    5 October 2021 14: 08
                    Quote: ALARI
                    After all, he does not refuse.

                    And who will refuse?
                    1. +3
                      5 October 2021 14: 15
                      Well, if the money is not returnable as the channel receives now, then no one will refuse. But if the money needs to be returned, then they would not have taken it, and why does advertising cover everything?
                      1. -5
                        5 October 2021 14: 16
                        Quote: ALARI
                        it wouldn’t be taken

                        Money is never superfluous
                        1. 0
                          5 October 2021 14: 22
                          You take someone else's, and you give yours.
                        2. -5
                          5 October 2021 14: 24
                          This is when you take it. And then they give
                        3. +1
                          5 October 2021 14: 28
                          Free of charge, that is, for nothing, if only they did not say too much and blew into the pipe as it should.
                        4. +3
                          5 October 2021 17: 58
                          Yes, you can see that despite the mountains of free billions from the state pocket, Channel One is still very unprofitable. That's all advertising.
                          According to the results of last year, Channel One received 4,6 billion rubles in net loss with revenue of 27 billion rubles, a year earlier - 6,8 billion rubles.

                          https://www.finanz.ru/novosti/aktsii/pervy-kanal-spasut-ot-mnogomilliardnykh-ubytkov-na-dengi-vtb-1029915330
                  2. +2
                    5 October 2021 14: 23
                    I think this is payment for the "correct" public interpretation of the government's course.
                  3. -1
                    6 October 2021 15: 47
                    and from Putin's 10 K not a single pensioner refused, as well as the mothers of children from school..why 1 channel should refuse?
                2. The comment was deleted.
              2. -1
                5 October 2021 14: 53
                At the expense of the "First"? No matter how it is! "First" - we also have a beggar. What was there in the Kommersant publication dated 19.11.2018/2018/2021? Channel One will need regular subsidies from the federal budget, it follows from the calculations prepared by PwC. In 6,5-2022, payments should be 2025 billion rubles, and in 5-1 - XNUMX billion rubles. in year. The money will be needed to stabilize the financial position of the channel, which has suffered losses in recent years and has lost competition with Russia XNUMX, a member of the VGTRK.
                So there was only one way out - to arrange this film screening together with Roscosmos at the state expense. At the expense of targeted money allocated for the current FKP (for the development of Russian cosmonautics, for scientific research, etc.). And that was done.
              3. 0
                5 October 2021 16: 36
                Quote: ALARI
                Such information is contained on the official website of regulatory legal acts in Appendix 11 to the bill "On the federal budget for 2020 and for the planning period of 2021 and 2022".


                Another lie of the next "calorimeter".

                There is no such "information" there. Just look here ...
                http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_339305/f34cdd73b807ef86b1e9e59421e25c32948fed6d/

                Moreover, there is not a single point where "VGTRK, Channel One, NTV and RT" are mentioned at the same time.

                Moreover, Channel One on
                ... production and purchase of content from federal TV channels ...

                do not get NO RUBLES!
            2. +8
              5 October 2021 13: 38
              Is the "First Channel" type not financed from the state budget?
              1. -16
                5 October 2021 13: 47
                Quote: Bogalex
                Is the "First Channel" type not financed from the state budget?

                The channel for advertising makes good money
                1. +6
                  5 October 2021 14: 07
                  However, this does not prevent them from receiving government subsidies.
            3. +5
              5 October 2021 13: 44
              For starters, you would ask who is the largest shareholder of the first channel, and from whom this channel begs for subsidies ...
              1. +3
                5 October 2021 16: 21
                Even more interesting is the fact that the channel is a beggar, and Konstantin Lvovich Ernst is already involved in the scandal with offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands. Where a person gets money from is not clear. With losses of "First" over the past 5 years in the amount of 9 billion rubles.
                1. -1
                  6 October 2021 15: 48
                  laughing such a "scandal" that everyone knew about him a year ago?)
          4. -4
            5 October 2021 13: 39
            But to pay - you. And by the way ...
            1. 0
              6 October 2021 17: 43
              “Instead of finding money, making an additional spacecraft, they took a spacecraft under the Federal Space Program, paid for by the government, on which professional cosmonauts were supposed to fly. There was a flight plan, and this whole plan was redrawn ", - noted, in particular, the design engineer of space instrumentation Alexander Ukrainsev." - Urya-ah !!!
          5. +2
            5 October 2021 14: 41
            The pressing tasks are too complex for Roscosmos. But the man in the street still needs to hang noodles on his ears. Which one? If there are no obvious successes?
            Against the background of the already too obvious stagnation of Russian cosmonautics, some kind of trigger was urgently needed, allowing, on the one hand, to switch the attention of the Russian man in the street, and on the other to emphasize that things in Kazakhstan are still going great.
            But how do you find such a trigger? It will not work, because you need to do something that even remotely resembles the Merlin and Raptor engines, a reusable stage of the launch vehicle, or to bring to mind in the end a reusable manned spacecraft. Of course, Roskosmos is unable to accomplish such feats today.
            And here comes the infa that Cruz and Lyman either at the end of 2021, or at the beginning of 2022 fly to the ISS to shoot some episodes of the new film.
            Here it is! This is where we can get ahead of the mattress toppers! Make a movie before them! This is Roskosmos - one spit! And the carousel spun ...
            The recruitment of two crews was immediately shaken. Dubrov, much to his surprise, found out that he, it turns out, was preparing for the flight already according to the annual program (by the way, the mission of annual flights is being prepared in 2-2,5 years according to a special scientific program, but not from the bay-flounder, at the behest of a pike Rogozin). Babkin was shot down, Korsakov was moved (albeit for a different reason). The entire load at the time of EVA (and it will be considerable, after all, "Science" needs to be somehow integrated into the ISS RS, at least 8-9 more exits on this topic within EVA are shining), as well as all other work inside the ISS RS now falls on the shoulders of not three, but only two crew members. Nothing, they will survive. But we'll shoot a movie. But there will be a reason to shout "Hooray !!! We are the first in space again !!!" When in "Science" there will be an opportunity to be engaged, finally, in science - the question is insignificant.
            The task of this film adventure is to show off and divert attention from the apparent failures of Roscosmos. From the fact that last year, for example, the net profit of this state corporation fell 42 times compared to the previous year. That only 55% of the planned targets have been completed. That the program "Cosmodromes of Russia" was fulfilled only by 30% of the plan (only 8 out of 26 planned events were closed). That half of the tasks for the current FKP have not been completed. That out of the 261,3 billion rubles allocated to Roscosmos within the framework of the state space program from the federal budget, in fact, not so much has been used profitably, because every third goal set by Roscosmos has failed. That the net profit of Roscosmos last year amounted to a measly 293 million rubles (footballer Dziuba gets more!). That the revenue decreased by twenty-five billion rubles, and more than a billion was lost on foreign contracts. But we shoot a movie in space! But the salary of the head of this department, Mr. Rogozin, has doubled over the same period!
            1. +2
              5 October 2021 14: 53
              Yesterday evening I clicked on the channels and ended up at the end of a report about space. So there the reporter, in all seriousness and with pathos, said that there are three toilets on the ISS and that they are run by our cosmonauts, and the American one does not work. Maybe in the beginning there was something about science I don't know, but after that I was a little, kind of mildly, surprised - is that the only thing that they are proud of already? what
              1. +6
                5 October 2021 15: 00
                But why? We are not only proud of the toilets.
                We are shooting a movie. Isn't it an achievement? True, many people do not understand at all why spend two billion rubles in order to shoot a maximum of forty minutes of scenes in space? What is there on the ISS that cannot be filmed on Earth in the pavilion with the current level of IT technologies? "Gravity" with Sandra Bullock was filmed in pavilions using computer graphics. This did not prevent the film from becoming the best in terms of showing space and only in the United States to collect over $ 274 million and a little short of half a billion worldwide with a budget of $ 100 million. Apollo 13 was filmed excellently back in 1995, while the level of technology. Do you still need real weightlessness? Please, there are IL-76KT aircraft, built specifically for training cosmonauts in conditions of simulated weightlessness. There are three IL-76MDK Kosmos planes on Chkalovsky. The machines have been reequipped for training cosmonauts in artificial zero gravity. For Russian cinema, it is an insurmountable difficulty to attach the interior "under the ISS" to a specific episode? about the system of imitation of the effect of weightlessness? It is difficult to make the appropriate scenery? How then did Shipenko shoot his Salyut-7? Re-sounding in general will probably have to be done on Earth, at the station there is a very strong constant noise from working fans and other equipment.
                1. +3
                  5 October 2021 15: 14
                  So why am I at a loss? And there is also such a factor as the body will behave in weightlessness. Cosmonauts have been trained and twisted for years, but these six months and more? These will fly away in 12 days, and then wash the station and live for another 174 days.
                  1. +3
                    5 October 2021 15: 28
                    We'll see how filmmakers adapt. I hope that Yulia's adaptation will be better than Tereshkova's.
                    I'm more worried about the plot of the picture. If the storyline announced in the media is true, then it will be curious to see how Yulia will perform cardio surgery in zero gravity. No assistants or equipment. It will be a masterpiece that will overshadow the process of dragging Fedya's robot by the arms and legs along the ISS modules.
                    1. +1
                      5 October 2021 15: 38
                      Well, depending on which film will be documentary, fiction or fantastic (most likely). If the latter, then, as usual (in our last films), there will be a violation of the laws of the universe and cause-and-effect relationship. The action will add more and will do. And if not, I don’t know.
                      1. +2
                        5 October 2021 15: 49
                        Wait and see. If Shipenko does not get the Oscar, then the film itself will definitely knock out a tear from the viewer. In this case, Shipenko has become skilled. What is his previous masterpiece "Salyut-7" worth!
                        There he brilliantly managed to play on the emotions of teapots, exalted ladies and shkolota who skipped at least half of their physics lessons. They are still squealing with delight on YouTube. "Cinema always strives for the truth" - the words of Shipenko. If so, why did he forget about it, filming his "Salyut-7"? Dzhanibekov and Savinykh, by the way, were far from enthusiastic about the picture. Savinykh was generally categorically against the episode with a sledgehammer and a solar sensor, but who would allow him to reduce the emotional intensity? Beating with a sledgehammer with a sledgehammer on the body of the SB orientation sensor (in zero gravity, Karl !!!) is so spectacular! So cool! This reminds of the happy end of American blockbusters with the invariable phrase in the ending "We did it!"
                        1. +3
                          5 October 2021 16: 03
                          Yes, Shipenko with his Salute is far from Villeneuve with Dune. Both had sources. One shot a cranberry (for the foreign market, I tried it similarly), the other was for book lovers. But to each his own, someone drinks diluted alcohol, and someone good brandy. The effect on the body is the same, but the process itself is not for an amateur)))
                        2. +1
                          6 October 2021 00: 18
                          Quote: Cosm22
                          Wait and see...
                          I would like so much in the words of a cartoon character - and you are evil ...but it's so sad to read it crying
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                2. +2
                  5 October 2021 15: 50
                  Quote: Cosm22
                  Is it an insurmountable difficulty for Russian cinematography to attach the interior "under the ISS" to a specific episode?

                  On Earth in Star City there is a copy of the ISS with an interior ...
                  1. -1
                    5 October 2021 18: 54
                    Quote: Hyperion
                    Quote: Cosm22
                    Is it an insurmountable difficulty for Russian cinematography to attach the interior "under the ISS" to a specific episode?

                    On Earth in Star City there is a copy of the ISS with an interior ...

                    leave a copy of space for the prime minister of Great Britain

                    all the charm of the current event in the world's first field shooting of the hf in orbit
                    1. +2
                      5 October 2021 20: 46
                      What has Boris got to do with it?
                      Quote: poquello
                      all the charm of the current event in the world's first field shooting of the hf in orbit

                      What's so cute? So I watched a documentary series about the ISS - "A Year in Orbit" - there it is interesting to show the life of astronauts, what is there and how it works. A feature film can easily be filmed on the ground - the special effects are now at the level.
                      1. -1
                        5 October 2021 20: 54
                        Quote: Hyperion
                        What has Boris got to do with it?

                        Quote: poquello



                        with his hairstyle add only decorations
                        1. 0
                          5 October 2021 21: 05
                          Then Lena Lenin is better.
                3. 0
                  6 October 2021 15: 49
                  laughing hmm ... why do something if you can draw? do not write stupid posts
            2. +1
              5 October 2021 14: 57
              Quote: Cosm22
              And here comes the infa that Cruz and Lyman either at the end of 2021, or at the beginning of 2022 fly to the ISS to shoot some episodes of the new film.
              Here it is! This is where we can get ahead of the mattress toppers!

              Are you sure you haven't messed up the sequence of events? In the sense that they decided to send Cruise into space before the decision was made to send Russian actors, and not after? Or "it can't be just because it can't be"?
              1. 0
                5 October 2021 15: 13
                I am absolutely sure.
                As well as the fact that Rogozin came up with the ingenious idea to shoot a movie in space at the state expense after passing the news about the possible filming of the United States. Moreover, he himself let slip that Lyman addressed him with his idea.
                But filming is not the same.
                Tom Cruise and director Doug Lyman are listed as space tourists on the Space Shuttle Almanac Twitter page. The film, the elements of which will be filmed in space, is financed by Universal, which is allocating 200 million green American rubles for this purpose. NASA and SpaceX Musk will also join the studio. Even if this movie was financed by Musk alone, there are no complaints about him. Musk is the head of a private company and is free to dispose of a certain part of the money at his own discretion (a certain part of the money is under the control of shareholders, the Board of Directors, etc.).
                Now let's see what we have in Russia.
                We immediately draw attention to the names of the general producers of the expected film masterpiece. In the forefront are Rogozin and Ernst. A producer is a person who, among other things, exercises organizational and financial control over the production of a film, and manages the issues of increasing the budget.
                But! Rogozin is a civil servant. Having neither the moral nor the legal right to even touch the money of the department under his control, if such an operation goes beyond the framework approved by the FKP. Maybe DOR decided to increase the popularity of Russian astronautics from his personal savings? Alas, no such information could be found. But he could have contributed his little bit to this project of the century without problems, the annual salary of the current head of Roscosmos has already exceeded the figure of one million one hundred thousand US dollars, which, by the way, is several times more than the annual amount that the director of NASA receives. And Ernst is not a poor man, he could fork out if he was so concerned about the popularization of Russian cosmonautics. But the role of patrons of the arts does not appeal to our producers, they strive more for free. Ernst with his "First" is not eager to follow the example of Universal and to sponsor his movie masterpiece that way for 200 bucks. What for? If you can put your hand into the pocket of the FKP? Whose budget is being systematically cut from above?
                1. +1
                  5 October 2021 15: 26
                  Quote: Cosm22
                  I am absolutely sure.

                  Confidence is good.
                  It is a pity that you cannot confirm this confidence in anything.
                  1. 0
                    5 October 2021 15: 40
                    Sometimes it is useful to look through the Russian press as well. In particular, "Komsomolskaya Pravda". In an interview in which Rogozin says the following - "At the beginning of 2020, American film director Doug Lyman contacted us. He shot many famous Hollywood films, including" Mr. and Mrs. Smith. "This director works very interestingly with many US cinema stars. including Tom Cruise. They asked to come and see our capabilities to provide filming directly in outer space. "
                    The word "beginning" means that this conversation took place no later than 06.20022. The stunning news about the future of Russian space cinema appeared on the Roscosmos website only on September 22.09.2020, XNUMX. Feel the difference.
                    1. 0
                      5 October 2021 15: 59
                      Quote: Cosm22
                      The word "beginning" means that this conversation took place no later than 06.20022. The stunning news about the future of Russian space cinema appeared on the Roscosmos website only on September 22.09.2020, XNUMX. Feel the difference.

                      Even if this is so, it turns out that the Americans started the project earlier and ... screwed up. Observe
                      Quote: Cosm22
                      They asked to come and get acquainted with our capabilities to ensure the filming of a film directly in outer space "
                      turned to Roskosmos. Not to Musk or NASA.
                      But. Before the news on a joint project with Channel One appeared on the Roscosmos website, a lot of approvals had to take place both on the project itself and on its support. It is doubtful that this amount of work could have been completed in 3-4 months.
                      By the way, I did not find information - Rogozin refused Lyman or Lyman was not satisfied with something?
                      1. +4
                        5 October 2021 16: 14
                        And you will not find it.
                        Rogozin just took advantage of this idea for his own purposes. Lyman is still continuing his project in the United States.
                        But these are trifles. Who cares who first came up with this idea?
                        It's not that.
                        The fact is that the moment for this cinema circus was chosen by Rogozin extremely unsuccessfully. Extremely.
                        And all because of the fact that it was necessary to get ahead of the Americans at least in some way.
                        Meanwhile, the situation at the station is tense. The crew has no time for cinema today.
                        A huge load now falls on the shoulders of two Russian guys. But there will be no third crew member. It will not continue. On December 8, Soyuz MS-20 (Misurkin, Maezawa, Hirano) flies to the station. If before that one place was given to the Americans, and then two were taken by representatives of the Russian film industry, then two Japanese will fly in the winter. And again, two Russian guys without a third will work for wear and tear. No one will do their daily work for them. Nobody will integrate "Science" for them. How many hours EVA will last for them is unknown. And if there are new leaks at Zvezdy PrK? And they will be anyway. Or elsewhere? Should they burst?
                        By the way, there are no complaints about the Japanese. They signed a contract back in 2019, signed a contract for the ship and paid for it. Unlike our filmmakers, who fly for free for the money of the FKP. However, the Soyuz MS-20 flight is purely tourist. As the MC-20 takes off on December 8th with three people, so it will land with them on the 20th. Shkaplerov will go to EVK-54. Before and after that, all work on EVA-51/52/53 and docking of Progress MS-19 to the Poisk module, as well as re-docking of Soyuz MS-19 from the Rassvet module to the Prichal UM module has already in March next year, the same unchanged Dubrov and Shkaplerov will be performed. Thank you cinema. And only on March 28, 2022, Dubrov will finally have the opportunity to get to Earth after the arrival of Soyuz MS-18 on March 21 with Artemiev, Matveev and Korsakov.
                        1. 0
                          5 October 2021 16: 25
                          Quote: Cosm22
                          But these are trifles. Who cares who first came up with this idea?
                          It's not that.

                          Up to this point, the main point of your previous comments has been that "this is the point."
                          But this moment is especially interesting:
                          Quote: Cosm22
                          And if there are new leaks at Zvezdy PrK? And they will be anyway.

                          Why so sure?
                          "I am tormented by vague doubts ..."
                        2. 0
                          5 October 2021 16: 40
                          In order not to be tormented, check the news about astronautics more often. Perhaps you will stumble upon an interview with Soloviev, who has already hinted at the loss of one docking station. However, after the disappearance from the media of any information about the state of cracks in the PrK after the "successful" docking of "Science", anyone could have assumed this.
                        3. +2
                          5 October 2021 17: 49
                          Well, to do away with "this is the point."
                          Let's leave Rogozin alone and look for more authoritative sources. Back in May 2020, NASA head Jim Bridenstein announced that filming with the participation of actor Tom Cruise was planned on board the ISS. in October 2021 as part of a touring crew aboard the SpaceX Crew Dragon. "
                          Roscosmos announced the Vybor project only three days later. Those. the desire to "catch up and overtake America" ​​is too obvious. Those. a simple date comparison makes it clear that the idea of ​​making a film on LEO was born in Russia solely in response to a similar US initiative.
                        4. 0
                          5 October 2021 19: 07
                          Quote: Cosm22
                          Those. a simple date comparison makes it clear that the idea of ​​making a film on LEO was born in Russia solely in response to a similar US initiative.

                          that is, your previously written phrase for throwing shit is no longer suitable here?
                          Quote: Cosm22
                          He's not the first to start. In the Soviet Union, a similar attempt was made four decades ago.
                        5. +1
                          5 October 2021 22: 10
                          If you interfere in the dialogue, take the trouble to understand what at least there is a speech about. And it goes about the priority of the idea to make a film in our days... Is it hard to understand?
                        6. +1
                          5 October 2021 23: 51
                          Quote: Cosm22
                          If you interfere in the dialogue, take the trouble to understand what at least there is a speech about. And it goes about the priority of the idea to make a film in our days... Is it hard to understand?

                          well then, in priority 5 minutes before the decision is made, exactly ours))))))))))))))))))))))
        2. +2
          5 October 2021 13: 19
          It is especially good for Babkin. All my life I was preparing, I dreamed of flying. At first, because of the Americans, there was no place, but now they have already been put into the crew, trained according to the program (a set of experiments on the ISS as part of the + EVA mission), and here is Ernst, and let's take off the movie. And that's it, retired Andrew.


          1. +5
            5 October 2021 14: 29
            Babkin's crew broke up due to the illness of a member of his crew. Therefore, now he will be assigned to a different crew.
          2. +1
            6 October 2021 02: 32
            donavi49
            donavi49
            Yesterday, 13: 19
            NEW

            +4
            It is especially good for Babkin. All my life I was preparing, I dreamed of flying. At first, because of the Americans, there was no place, but now they have already been put into the crew, trained according to the program (a set of experiments on the ISS as part of the + EVA mission), and here is Ernst, and let's take off the movie. And that's it, retired Andrew.
            Are you in the State Commission for the approval of crew members for space flights? tongue fool Or in the Human Resources Administration of the Russian Federation, in order to send them to retirement in advance? wassat fool laughing
        3. 0
          5 October 2021 13: 37
          And what is good about this business?
      4. -3
        5 October 2021 14: 55
        The clowns flew, and then they will collect money for the next disabled person on the blue screen.
        1. -2
          5 October 2021 16: 00
          In some countries, money for such purposes is collected in a different way.
          Here Musk launched Crew Dragon into orbit with 4 tourists. So they, firstly, paid at least something, and did not put their hand into the state pocket. Secondly, that flight also had a purely pragmatic noble goal: this mission was aimed at raising funds for one of the largest hospitals for the treatment of cancer.
    2. +5
      5 October 2021 13: 04
      Part of the national income thrown into the water.
      1. -18
        5 October 2021 13: 25
        Quote: iouris
        Part of the national income thrown into the water.

        This is a project of the "First Channel"
        National income has nothing to do with it
        1. +5
          5 October 2021 13: 40
          Yeah. And "Channel One" for these pokatushki denyuzhku from where, do you guess? Is it not from the national income, at the expense of which it only exists?
          1. -15
            5 October 2021 13: 48
            Quote: Bogalex
            due to which it only exists?

            And through advertising
          2. 0
            5 October 2021 14: 31
            Quote: Bogalex
            Yeah. And "Channel One" for these pokatushki denyuzhku from where, do you guess? Is it not from the national income, at the expense of which it only exists?


            The major part is paid by JSC "Glavkosmos" from its own money earned from commercial launches. JSC "Glavkosmos" generally pays for a lot from extra-budgetary sources, for example, they recently paid for tests of new engines.
        2. -5
          5 October 2021 14: 12
          This is what the baragozin says in you.
          Your ignorance and naivety amazes.
          It seems like an adult, but you walk in pink glasses and believe in fairy tales ...
        3. 0
          5 October 2021 14: 56
          This is a project of the "First Channel"
          National income has nothing to do with it


          Isn't Channel One funded from the federal budget?
    3. 0
      5 October 2021 13: 08
      Well, now Oscar is definitely ours! Well, or a palm branch.
      1. +13
        5 October 2021 13: 11
        Well, now Oscar is definitely ours! Well, or a palm branch


        Nah, Americans will definitely heal. Because, by their standards, there were no African Americans or other races involved in the movie, and most importantly, there were no rainbow actors.
        So they won't. Filmed not by the standards of cinema.
        1. 0
          5 October 2021 13: 15
          But they definitely changed the criteria for films, as they knew angry
          1. -3
            5 October 2021 13: 16
            But they definitely changed the criteria for films, as they knew

            That's right - they spy everywhere. And as soon as our people were going to shoot a movie in space, the rules were changed immediately. lol
            To avoid giving a prize.
        2. -6
          5 October 2021 13: 27
          Quote: Nexcom
          Filmed not by the standards of cinema.

          And it's too late to change the script request
          1. -2
            5 October 2021 13: 30
            Unless all new actors are urgently sent there by standards. Ahh, well, yes, the script will have to be changed ... In general, there are only problems.
      2. +1
        5 October 2021 13: 15
        Well, or a palm branch.
        - somehow everything is not patriotic with you, spruce or birch will cost laughing
        1. 0
          5 October 2021 13: 18
          Well, they will definitely be the first at Kinotavr. the truth is, the game is not worth the candle, the money will not beat back.
        2. +2
          5 October 2021 13: 20
          Well, or a palm branch


          A bunch of plantain will be cooler. laughing
      3. 0
        5 October 2021 13: 30
        Well, now Oscar is definitely ours! Well, or a palm branch.
        Yes, everything is now ours and Oscar and branches and bears, we will collect all the prizes, even the Golden Ear at the Kryzhovlya Film Festival. laughing
        1. -2
          5 October 2021 13: 42
          I look Rogozin in the film producers moved and that's right, as a journalist, it is closer and clearer than some kind of rockets, cosmodromes. Why is he worse than Mikhalkov?
      4. +1
        5 October 2021 14: 13
        Baragozin is now like Fellini.
        Give an Oscar to the "space" goddess!
    4. +2
      5 October 2021 13: 09
      I don't see the difference between sending artists into space or tourists. In this case, I am interested in the question - at whose expense the "banquet"?
      1. 0
        5 October 2021 13: 11
        For a budget ...
        1. 0
          5 October 2021 13: 13
          Quote: Minus
          For a budget ...

          It's sad if so. Hopefully the rental income in this case will also go to the budget. It would be fair.
          1. -3
            5 October 2021 13: 16
            Well, hope, as everyone knows, dies last ...
          2. -3
            5 October 2021 13: 20
            Tinkoff and Megafon paid
            1. -2
              5 October 2021 13: 23
              Tinkoff and Megafon paid

              Seriously ? Why are they so generous then? Or is the entire station being stuck with their advertisements for it?
          3. +5
            5 October 2021 14: 32
            Quote: Lesovik
            Quote: Minus
            For a budget ...

            Sad if so.


            Not this way. Above is written who pays for what.
        2. -10
          5 October 2021 13: 29
          Quote: Minus
          For a budget ...

          No need to lie.
          This is a channel 1 project, they paid for everything
          1. +3
            5 October 2021 13: 37
            Yes, yes, but where did the ever-unprofitable first channel get the money?
            1. -11
              5 October 2021 13: 45
              Quote: faiver
              Yes, yes, but where did the ever-unprofitable first channel get the money?

              Unprofitable? Do you know how much they earn from advertising?
              1. 0
                5 October 2021 13: 53
                what's the point? in debt as in silks
                1. -11
                  5 October 2021 13: 54
                  They won't do this with the last money
                  1. +1
                    5 October 2021 13: 59
                    they have no "last" money, the budget will always help ...
              2. 0
                5 October 2021 15: 00
                Well, how much do they earn from advertising? Are there numbers?
          2. +1
            5 October 2021 14: 07
            It has long been answered by representatives of Roscosmos that the funding is from Roscosmos !!!! About channel 1. You do not know that he ends up almost every year with a net loss and is subsidized by the state ????
      2. +1
        5 October 2021 13: 18
        I don't see the difference between sending artists into space or tourists.
        So one of the explanations for this cosmic representation is the testing of sending little trained people with the prospect of using this experience to send space tourists.
      3. +6
        5 October 2021 13: 24
        400 million rubles of irrevocable money from FondKino.
        The flight is funded by Roscosmos.
        Post-production, filming on the ground and advertising - Channel 1 + VBD (Kitchen, Daddy's daughters and other serials).
        1. +2
          5 October 2021 19: 18
          Quote: donavi49
          400 million rubles of irrevocable money from FondKino.

          it's better than spending on films like Leviathan
      4. -12
        5 October 2021 13: 28
        Quote: Lesovik
        In this case, I am interested in the question - at whose expense the "banquet"?

        Due to the "First Channel"
        1. -1
          5 October 2021 13: 31
          Quote: Seryoga64
          Due to the "First Channel"

          Well, if the money is not budgetary, then I am calm.
          It remains only to find out which of those who answered me this question will be right hi
          1. -6
            5 October 2021 13: 35
            Quote: Lesovik
            It remains only to find out which of those who answered me this question will be right

            According to the First, they hear about it for almost a month
            1. 0
              5 October 2021 13: 39
              Convinced. It's just that I rarely watch TV. Once.
            2. -1
              5 October 2021 14: 19
              Dear, why are you so worried?
              To paraphrase the immortal classics: "Is this your uncle, Channel One? Your dad, Channel One?"
          2. -2
            5 October 2021 13: 39
            a little too early you calmed down bully
            1. -1
              5 October 2021 13: 49
              Quote: faiver
              a little too early you calmed down

              Well, how long are you skillfully drinks
              I cannot afford the luxury of being constantly in a state of anxiety for any reason. So you can earn an ulcer wink
          3. +2
            5 October 2021 14: 22
            ... the actress and the director / operator are flying on a regular ship, which, together with the rocket, is paid for from the funds of the Federal Space Program, and does not compensate for the corresponding budgetary expenses in any way. Only their training at the CPC will be paid.





            1. +1
              5 October 2021 16: 06
              Quote: Avior
              and do not compensate for the corresponding budgetary expenses in any way.


              This project has already attracted potential customers. Three commercial ships are queuing up.
              1. +1
                5 October 2021 16: 08
                We are talking about a specific flight and the source of its funding
                1. +3
                  5 October 2021 16: 30
                  Quote: Avior
                  We are talking about a specific flight and the source of its funding


                  The spacecraft is in the program as another "rescue ship" of the ISS station. This is our contribution to the international project. Russia is obliged, as a project participant, to launch two ships per year to the station.

                  Unlike completely commercial ships, the first of which flies after a month later.
    5. +1
      5 October 2021 13: 11
      Rather, the flight of the Americans was planned, but after the refusal of flights, someone had to be launched. Well, the artists started to make films. At least some money will earn.
      1. +5
        5 October 2021 13: 23
        Quote: Alexander Betonkin
        Rather, the flight of the Americans was planned.

        This year Tom Cruise and director Doug Lyman ("The Bourne Identity", "Edge of Tomorrow") are going into space.
        Ours was impatient to become the first ones. Hence the whole kipish.
        1. +2
          5 October 2021 13: 59
          Yes. But Cruz is still unclear. So far, it is not declared anywhere by rail.

          This year the Americans will carry only Cru3 at the end of the month, crew change, 3 Americans and 1 German from ESA.

          In the 22nd year, the places are painted:
          - Axium 1 - billionaire grandfathers on the ISS. February.
          - Axium 2 - the legendary grandma Peggy Winston (without 1,5 hours 666 days in space and 60 hours of EVA) will be lucky for the racer, show pilot, participant in the Red Bull air races and another billionaire investor in the appendage. Discovery Channel bought two more places for its show.

          - New Inspiration - it is not yet clear who, but there will be 1 place raffled, 1 pilot, 2 places are sold at the auction.

          There is one more slot for 1 years to the ISS for the fall from SpaceX / Axium22.
      2. -1
        5 October 2021 13: 24
        The flight schedule was changed and the artists were sent instead of the cosmonauts .... Back in the spring there were articles about the bewilderment of astronauts and scientists about this. But the trampoline really wanted to send the artists ...
        1. +4
          5 October 2021 14: 38
          Quote: Minus
          The flight schedule was changed and instead of the cosmonauts, the artists were sent ...


          Have you seen this "flight schedule"? laughing Why are you lying? Crews at the CTC are constantly trained, but they are appointed for flight by the State Commission. This crew skated the training of a civilian specialist for launching to the station.
        2. +1
          5 October 2021 16: 46
          Yes it is.
          Cosmonauts Fyodor Yurchikhin, Sergei Zaletin, Svetlana Savitskaya, Gennady Padalka, Mikhail Kornienko and others were opposed. Kornienko said bluntly that "such projects should be implemented within the framework of commercial astronautics."
          Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov, who oversees the defense industry, aviation and space in the government, and Sergei Krikalev, executive director of the state corporation Roscosmos for manned space programs, reared on their hind legs.
          Sergei Krikalev managed to make a dizzying somersault in his career in just a week - he was both an adviser and the head of a non-existent operating organization, and returned to his previous position. He returned, probably only because they either poked from the Kremlin, because the discontent in the CPC was serious, or Rogozin was informed that Krikalev was, it turns out, the confidant of President Putin in the 2018 elections, he had to urgently cut the back and awkwardly make excuses in the media.
      3. +1
        5 October 2021 15: 22
        They will fly instead of Andrei Babkin, who has completed the full training program. He will never fly.
        Cosmonauts Krikalev and Savitskaya-Krikalev tried to perform the tide of these filming due to the space program, it was worth the work.
    6. +6
      5 October 2021 13: 11
      Honestly. I don’t understand and don’t accept what is wrong with the project?
      Good luck in solving the tasks and returning to Earth.
      1. +3
        5 October 2021 13: 41
        Quote: ODERVIT
        I don’t understand and don’t accept what is wrong with the project?

        what is not clear? - This is "Russian propaganda", the West allocates a lot of money to fight it. And Ukrainian bot farms graze here in herds.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          5 October 2021 15: 10
          Do you call me a bot farm, unrepentant? A native Siberian, a father of many children?
          1. -6
            5 October 2021 15: 18
            Quote: Minus
            A native Siberian, a father of many children?

            Where bot farms are frolicking, in the conditions of a total anti-Russian assault - an information war, it is forbidden to express dissatisfaction with "Russian propaganda", even if you don't like something.
            I signed up for the ROA - an enemy and a traitor, and you don't need to tell people that you just don't like Stalin. Otherwise they would have been orphan girls.
            1. -2
              5 October 2021 15: 53
              So far, I see some who have actually signed up in the roa, those who justify Rogozin and the like.
      2. +2
        5 October 2021 16: 29
        Open the law of the Russian Federation "On space activities".

        Find Section II. ORGANIZATION OF SPACE ACTIVITIES.
        Find Article 8. Federal Space Program of Russia.

        1. The Federal Space Program of Russia is a long-term planning document, on the basis of which a state order is formed for the creation, manufacture and use of space technology for scientific and socio-economic purposes.

        Where is there even a single word about cinema? About the circus? About ballet? About the fact that you need to use a planned medium for cinema? Want to make a movie? Pay for PH and everything else.
    7. +2
      5 October 2021 13: 21
      Good luck guys
    8. +2
      5 October 2021 13: 22
      Roscosmos' net profit for 2020 has broken through the bottom, but nothing, now we will shoot cartoons in space ..
      1. -3
        5 October 2021 17: 14
        In the yard, if that is 2021 and it has not ended yet at the end of the year it will be seen how much Roscosmos earned and how much it did not earn from the original plan.
    9. +4
      5 October 2021 13: 24
      Shaw say ... but nothing, in general.
      Let them shoot, it will be interesting for the children to see ... I guess.
    10. +3
      5 October 2021 13: 38
      This is great! Ay, well done !!! We have long overdue this question - we have made our own (space) station and are running in Mars (apart from pindo ... partners from America) is designed, financed and put into production ... What is it you want? This project is also epic conceived. Have you even taken a hat with earflaps? ...
      I (personally) have such a strong opinion - everything that Yoprst's hand touches is essentially spiritless ... From films that you don't want to watch twice to ... Am I wrong? IMHO.
    11. -4
      5 October 2021 13: 51
      Roscosmos moved to the Film Industry? So I have a better idea for Rogozin: let the Metallica group be taken to the ISS, where they will again, but already in orbit, perform Tsoi's song "Blood Group" - this will be Full House wassat
      1. -2
        5 October 2021 17: 15
        In this case, our answer "Gravity" of Cuaron is better immediately.
    12. -1
      5 October 2021 13: 59
      One of the rarest, in recent years, imputed actions from the point of view of the EXTREME need to promote cosmonautics and, in a broader sense, education and participation of science in life!
      At least something is already good!
      1. +3
        5 October 2021 17: 22
        For the propaganda of cosmonautics, it is not this cinema circus that is needed, but the clever and competent development of this very cosmonautics. It is necessary not only to fly the royal "seven", but to systematically create new engines, new launch vehicles, put forward and implement new ideas and concepts, set more and more ambitious goals and achieve their fulfillment. Trampling on the spot is unlikely to contribute to the popularization of astronautics. And no cinema circus here will correct the weather.
        And if you are already making a movie, then a sane film, and not wild nonsense. What is the film about, if you believe the information already available? About the fact that a medical woman urgently flies to the station to perform an urgent operation on a crew member. How urgent is it? If the head of the CTC Kharlamov said that the training of non-professional flight participants took a little more than four months, excluding medical selection? A little more and without taking into account - this is almost six months. This is urgent? A patient with a mortally sick heart will wait for an operation in space in zero gravity for 4-6 months?
        1. +1
          6 October 2021 10: 33
          Let's wait and see what happens. I don't really believe in the high artistic qualities of the film either, but we'll see.
        2. 0
          6 October 2021 10: 34
          You are probably a graduate of the Soviet school ... Now, alas, others rule. The Unified State Exam rules. Education. Here's to them, the above, the main thing is dust in their eyes and a superficial attitude to everything.
    13. +2
      5 October 2021 14: 05
      And there the actors infiltrated. And at whose expense will they get priarized?
    14. +1
      5 October 2021 14: 07
      No, well, if Derevyanko and Vdovichenkov had flown, there would have been no questions! And then ... let's see what they are filming there, but if the Americans also join them? what
    15. +5
      5 October 2021 14: 12
      We responded to Nifigase with Hollywood special effects ....
    16. +2
      5 October 2021 14: 40
      As someone very smart said, the most important thing in cinema is 3 things:
      1- scenario.
      2- scenario,
      3- scenario.
      Then it doesn't matter who was filmed and where was filmed ...
      Unfortunately, the creations of the first channel often cause disgust and bewilderment, especially when they shoot on an important topic or about good people.
      It will be a pity if, as a result, this "kipisha" gets another film rubbish.
      1. 0
        5 October 2021 16: 31
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        It will be a pity if, as a result, this "kipisha" gets another film rubbish.

        Well, at least from the reviews then we'll laugh.
    17. -2
      5 October 2021 14: 47
      A good start is good.
      It looks like everything is very bad with funding in Roscosmos once I had to contact the first channel (((
      The Americans did not fly as they once planned, so they could give places to professionals, for the development of science, only now they cannot make money on this. And now the main thing is money, not science, sorry. One can argue that the money earned will be invested in the development of the space industry and the necessary programs! - just hard to believe, you know.
      But still there is a positive moment - no one has filmed a movie in space before us, we are the First again! bully
      Who will go to the movies or download from the torrent?)
    18. PCF
      0
      5 October 2021 14: 57
      Quote: Seryoga64
      So channels get much more for advertising.

      In enlightened Europe, in Germany in particular, there is a tax on television and radio. Iron. From every nose. You look, you don't look, it's your business, their business is to take the tax. And in prime time, advertising on all channels goes every 10-12 minutes.
      It is a sin to refuse money!
    19. -1
      5 October 2021 15: 11
      I wish the actress and director to vomit successfully in orbit for two weeks and not shoot anything .. - Anyway, everything on the ground will be reshomed .. Who will put her makeup there? And curl curls? It will swell, your eyes will be filled with blood, your hair will be disheveled .. -that's in all the movies ..
    20. +5
      5 October 2021 15: 58
      The manned spacecraft Soyuz MS-19 docked to the Russian segment of the International Space Station, having completed only two orbits around the Earth! Docking took place in manual mode. At the last meters, when the automation failed, Anton Shkaplerov took control and calmly, as was taught, docked the ship to the station.

      ISS configuration for today:

      1. +2
        5 October 2021 16: 35
        Honor and glory to the cosmonaut, who clearly worked out the emergency situation during the docking .. However, I watched reports from the First and other channels .. - and where, excuse me, are the happy faces of the actress and director?
        1. +4
          5 October 2021 16: 36
          Quote: Dikson
          Honor and glory to the cosmonaut, who clearly worked out the emergency situation during the docking .. However, I watched reports from the First and other channels .. - and where, excuse me, are the happy faces of the actress and director?


          Well, the director said his "Camera, motor!", And the actress assisted the commander in a clear voice. laughing



          In fact, this flight is a test of the new control system of the Union.

          Opening of hatches after 8 minutes.
          1. -1
            5 October 2021 17: 21
            [quote] In fact, this flight is a test of the new control system of the Union. / quote] ..... which immediately failed during docking ... In fact, this flight is a waste of money and resources .. fetish. How missiles, priests, painted "under Khokhloma", waving censers on the launch pad, and other husks .. Actually, it would be stupid to expect another from the current Roscosmos .. Recently Mr. the fact that "most likely" Eagle "will not fly when we (like many things already) have been promised by his boss, Mr. Rogozin .. And it will fly .. well, someday .. at 30 maybe .. And where hurry? - you don't have your station yet ..
            1. +1
              6 October 2021 01: 08
              Quote: Dikson
              In fact, this flight is a test of the new control system of the Union.
              ..... which immediately failed during docking ...


              Wrong again. The failure was in the receiving equipment of the station, the blocks of which were recently changed. The Soyuz was just working properly - at the right moments it turned off the speed and took the ship to a safe distance from the station.

              Quote: Dikson
              In fact - this flight is a waste of money and resources .. fetish.


              First of all, this is the new ISS "rescue ship". Don't understand the issue, just don't write crap.

              Quote: Dikson
              Like missiles painted "under Khokhloma", priests, waving censes on the launch pad, and other husks ..


              I have not seen the missiles "painted" under Khokhloma, I have seen them with stickers in the form of a patchwork quilt - the official print of the Winter Olympic Games in Sochi. In principle, what difference does it make what is painted on the rocket? Bezosov's blue and original blue feathers over their penis ...

              Quote: Dikson
              Actually, it would be stupid to expect anything else from the current Roscosmos ..


              Do you want blackjack with whores? laughing

              Quote: Dikson
              reported that "most likely the Eagle will not fly then,


              "Eagle" will fly as its launch site will be built on Vostochny.
              1. -1
                6 October 2021 05: 27
                Dear Slipped, why should I see blackjack with whores in Roscosmos? I think it's okay with this since the time of Popovkin, if you remember the bosses' fight over the cute secretary once at the Day of Cosmonautics ..)) You can take part in this yourself, and we will congratulate you if you succeed .. Otherwise, it will turn out again - build a space tug, but there is nothing to carry on it .. - so Roskosmos will be an eternal cab driver and taxi driver for someone who is not clear and who does not understand why ..) "First of all, this is a rescue ship" - you write .. Well, and that, now, instead of the necessary and necessary equipment and crew, it can be driven empty to the ISS? Like - for the banquet has already been paid, walk, flaw! - so what ?! There will be a reason to be proud of our cosmonauts and their achievements - we will definitely shout "Hurray!" .. until such an occasion is noticeable .. sorry.
                1. +2
                  6 October 2021 22: 37
                  Quote: Dikson
                  Dear Slipped, why should I see blackjack with whores in Roscosmos? I think it's okay with this since the time of Popovkin, if you remember the fight between bosses over a cute secretary once on Cosmonautics Day ..))


                  Fu, how ugly. In general, about the dead it is better either good or nothing .... Popovkin, by the way, stood up for the girl. Yes.

                  Quote: Dikson
                  You can take part in this yourself, and we will congratulate you if you succeed ..


                  Congratulations.



                  Quote: Dikson
                  Otherwise, it will work out again - build a space tug, but there is nothing to carry on it ..


                  What do you mean - again? Today we have three space tugs - upper stages: Briz-M and DM - launches in December, the upper stage Fregat - this year it has already had 9 launches and will have more than four more.

                  Quote: Dikson
                  - so Roskosmos will be an eternal cab and taxi driver for someone who is not clear and why ..)


                  This is incomprehensible to you, because you do not want to understand. laughing "Taxi driver" and "cab driver" - this bullshit was invented by hamsters. The same Musk - a taxi driver and a cab - carries other people's goods too. lol

                  Quote: Dikson
                  "First of all, this is a rescue ship" - you write .. So what, now, instead of the necessary and necessary equipment and crew, you can drive it empty to the ISS?


                  This is the ISS crew rescuer. The ISS has a crew and its evacuation is carried out by the Soyuz MS, and the latter has a period of stay in the station. If the previous Union has expired, it needs to be changed to a new one. What is not clear to you? For cargo we have Progress.

                  Quote: Dikson
                  There will be a reason to be proud of our cosmonauts and their achievements - we will definitely shout “Hurray!” .. until such an occasion is noticeable .. sorry.


                  Apparently, they are not your astronauts. laughing If Russia had not lent a helping hand to its partners in the station, after the shuttles stopped flying, ending their space tourism program because of this, then you would have seen Americans and other Europeans with Japanese in space for at least nine years. Their trampolines would hardly have solved the delivery issue at that time. laughing As for our people on the ISS, our part of the crew is fully loaded with their space experiments program.
      2. -1
        6 October 2021 10: 38
        You forgot to add - "with a constant failure of automation (well, the installer hit the wrong side on the orientation sensor with a mallet (the salary is the same as work))" ...
        1. +2
          6 October 2021 22: 43
          Quote: tovarich-andrey.62goncharov
          You forgot to add - "with a constant failure of automation (well, the installer hit the wrong side on the orientation sensor with a mallet (the salary is the same as work))" ...


          You have the wrong information, there are no "constant automatic failures". Most of our connections are automatic.
    21. +2
      5 October 2021 16: 10
      This is how conspiracy theories come about. laughing
      The station will be drowned in old age in X years.
      And 50 years later, the conspirators will declare:
      "There was no international space station. These are all custom-made art by director Nikita Mikhalkov! Where is the evidence that the station was in space ????" wassat
      1. +1
        5 October 2021 17: 17
        And in 50 years, all those moved by the "Cabin" will be forcibly and effectively treated.
        1. 0
          6 October 2021 02: 36

          Vadim237 (Vadim)
          Yesterday, 17: 17
          NEW

          +1
          And in 50 years, all those moved by the "Cabin" will be forcibly and effectively treated.
          We could have done it as soon as possible. wink
    22. -1
      5 October 2021 16: 48
      At whose expense did the "creative intelligentsia" fly into space?
      For ours. At the expense of the taxpayer.
      The cost of the "excursion" is 50 million green.
      And there was an offer from a Western director.
      And he would pay.
      And the "bestseller" that they are sculpting, what place will it take at the Cannes Festival?
      How much will the rental give?
      Will the money spent be recouped?
      Or is it a gift?
      If a gift, who is generous?
    23. 0
      5 October 2021 16: 55
      I didn’t understand why Ukryaklam didn’t like the idea of ​​Metallica on the ISS? No? In my opinion, it would be a great concert from orbit .. Okay, okay, without Tsoi's cover version, let them cover the Zemlyans group. "grass by the house" I think Hatfield would not mind laughing
      Or ukryaklam Leps with Mityaev on the ISS give ?? wassat
    24. +3
      5 October 2021 16: 57
      The rich have their quirks. Che to us! Yes, we have money like a fool of candy wrappers. As there, not mentioned for dinner, Chubais said: "We have money!"
    25. 0
      5 October 2021 17: 46
      It took the work of hundreds of thousands of people to launch the movie crew. I am proud, we are the first to shoot a part of the film in Earth orbit. And Hollywood was the first to shoot truthfully, in real mode, landing on the Moon in a pavilion on Earth. So no fun. Yes, and in December, the third time was difficult. We launch the hangar with the model of the ship, so we live.
    26. -2
      5 October 2021 18: 04
      My congratulations! All great fellows, especially the girl!
      "Call bearers", today is not your day. Bye.

      # rogozinrulit #!
    27. +2
      5 October 2021 18: 37
      After all, there was once a good usable resource. And turned into the devil knows what! Judging by the comments, in a mixture of Pikabu and typical urban cattle public !!!
      1. +3
        5 October 2021 19: 46
        Quote: Ponchik78
        After all, there was once a good usable resource. And turned into the devil knows what! Judging by the comments, in a mixture of Pikabu and typical urban cattle public !!!

        Bots are working, the West is consistently allocating money for information warfare,
        and Ukrainian bot farms are very cheap.
      2. 0
        6 October 2021 00: 05
        Well ... what a resource are such commentators)) Sometimes it is disgusting to read. The level of the material laid out, even on the Pikaba, sometimes does not pull. One suitable material accounts for a dozen other waste slag.
    28. +3
      5 October 2021 18: 37
      Wow, VO was honored to highlight the launch of the next Union, usually this is not noticed here)
      1. 0
        6 October 2021 15: 49
        so and so they write in a negative way .. for VO it is normal to leave cacao)
    29. +1
      5 October 2021 19: 08
      To hell with him, all this is for taxpayer money. But the next crap, like Chernobyl, will be removed.
      1. 0
        6 October 2021 15: 50
        wait and see .. lore claims should not arise ... it would be funnier if Tom Cruise was still the first to be .. how here the ora arranged about "why are they, and not us?"
    30. +2
      5 October 2021 19: 29
      The trampoline is cracking ...
    31. +1
      5 October 2021 19: 36
      It would be better if they launched someone from Pornhub, so they would earn it, not with money, so views.
      1. 0
        6 October 2021 02: 37

        surfdude (surfdude)
        Yesterday, 19: 36
        NEW
        0
        It would be better if they launched someone from Pornhub ...
        Who wouldи still doubted! tongue laughing lol
    32. 0
      5 October 2021 20: 04
      Quote: Vadim237
      In this case, our answer "Gravity" of Cuaron is better immediately.

      I'm talking about a concert and not about a film. A bullshit movie will be like Gravity, but a Broomstick concert from orbit would be a thing! Why Metallica itself and not Morbid Angel? Oh no, their churchmen will not approve, sorry wassat
    33. -1
      5 October 2021 22: 07
      Quote: slipped
      Quote: Stroporez
      It remains for Baragozin to launch a song and dance ensemble into space and record a gramophone record there.

      Enemies always have a burning sensation with our successes. laughing We will definitely dance and sing.

      lol Oh, and we have already read this somewhere. Well, of course you've read it, that's what the trolls write (yes, don't forget to mention Ukraine; although I forgot that this is not your role, there are others for that) ...
      1. +2
        6 October 2021 01: 17
        Quote: p0pulivox
        Oh, and we have already read this somewhere.


        I won’t be surprised that they probably even saw it .... from the basement, when the Hyundai Hoh was doing it. laughing

    34. 0
      5 October 2021 22: 17
      Quote: Cosm22
      In general, expected.
      Russia has already won brilliant victories on all space fronts.
      It's time to shout "Urrrya! Finally, we will wipe our nose to the Chinese, mattress toppers and personally to Elon Musk!"
      We are the first in space again! True, for some reason, it is still impossible to replace kerosene stoves with new modern rocket engines with a new type of fuel, create a reusable spacecraft, a reusable carrier stage, or even give birth to a superheavy concept, but in the field of ballet, sorry, cinema we are again ahead of the rest of the world!

      This whole story is another example of show, stupid propaganda and eyewash so (especially) beloved in our modern Fatherland. Yesterday there was a message that new cracks were found and we seem to have lost one of the two docking points (if not confusing). This is our reality ...
    35. +2
      5 October 2021 22: 40
      I read the comments and frankly became sad. What happened to the site. They were flooded with crowds of infantile liberoids, shrieking vsepalschikov, stupid minors (and not so) "experts on all issues", ukropatriots and others. Previously, it was interesting to read the comments, I would even say exciting, but now it's just disgusting. How much dirt people have in their heads, in relation to their Homeland. Bored girls.
      1. +1
        6 October 2021 00: 11
        You are 100+, my thoughts expressed. They did not fly badly, they flew even worse. Everyone is waiting for some geniuses to construct a miracle rocket, and other super workers will assemble them. Where can these geniuses and super people come from? If they are 40 years old, already 3-4 generations of people are being told that everything is bad with us, but it is good only in the west. This flight, maybe some future genius, will motivate him to become a designer or a worker. There is no film yet, already the reviews write that the film is the bottom. I went to the branch to read the stones about how they docked, how they went to the station, etc., and here is one negative. Once again, the girls are bored, you have become :(
      2. -1
        6 October 2021 15: 52
        yes it has been here for a long time ... there is no greater Russophobe than the Russians themselves ..
    36. -4
      5 October 2021 23: 58
      In short, another comedy from Bad will be released soon. Interestingly Zoya will surpass?
    37. 0
      6 October 2021 05: 31
      I congratulate and envy the actress with the director white envy, 400 hours of preparation and you are in space, this is space. smile
    38. 0
      6 October 2021 07: 15
      The bourgeois power in the Russian Federation, monkeys all the marketing moves of senior "partners" ...
      The current head of Roscosmos, a priori, knows better in PR than in gears - the education of a journalist says a lot (although there is supposedly a technical one) ...
      The flight of clowns into orbit is a kind of "our answer to the Mask" pure PR.
      With one difference - Musk uses PR to collect loot from hamsters, Rogozin spends loot from hamsters ...
    39. 0
      6 October 2021 07: 32
      Bread and circuses!
    40. 0
      6 October 2021 09: 29
      Rogozin finally arranged a circus, a clown, a pancake from the real "property of the republic." Already and so a laughing stock to the whole world, show men "gifted". The most offensive thing is that representatives of such poor and talentless ones have seized hold of the authorities that they themselves do not even realize how ridiculous and untalented they are, stupefied by free money, irresponsibility and impunity, despising their country and people. well, most importantly, the sidekick is all attached and the muzzles are in feathers, continuing to sleep softly and eat sweetly.
      1. 0
        6 October 2021 15: 53
        Well, yes .. when Musk for the state. means the roadster sent into space, everything squealed with joy ..
        1. 0
          6 October 2021 19: 15
          Sorry, but you did not understand the very essence of the question, citing a completely incorrect example. Here we are talking about our "gifted" (although what are they still our question), a few sketches and points for reflection, Musk's budget and most importantly the efficiency of its use and the ability to us to "master" the budget, achievements and the level of technology of the "partners" and our innovations as a humorist, songwriter, correspondent and effective manager, an innovative generator of ideas, successor of Korolev's affairs, the pinnacle of progress of which is painting the Unions in Gzhel and a cosmodrome in a swamp at burial grounds , or rather, cut billions under it. ”There is nothing to discuss, not interesting, good luck.
          1. -1
            6 October 2021 20: 05
            1) and who told you that Max does not master? And then information surfaced that the "low cost" for civilian launches was provided by several times overstated cost of launches for the military. About "the cosmodrome at the cemeteries and drank it" .. with this comment you showed that you are not competent in this matter: they decided to build Vostochny in 2007, and Rogozin was an ambassador to NATO until 2011, not to mention the fact that Rogozin was appointed to the commission as once after the breakdowns in the construction of the East ... So it's not about you luck ... you first study the topic, and then write a comment, otherwise the level of "topvar's expert" will soon break through the bottom for the third time)
            1. +1
              7 October 2021 12: 38
              Well, it's good that even though you are an expert analyst here, educate us here on the couches, otherwise we, out of our stupidity and thoughtlessness, sculpted cosmodromes wherever we have to, on different continents, in the steppes and in the Arctic, and we blinded a stupid carrier in the 60s , the infection still flies. I'm not interested in you, I consider further communication to be meaningless, and that's it, good luck in your work and reaching the heights of at least the 70s of the last century, to my "wretched" generation.
              1. -2
                7 October 2021 13: 04
                laughing Well, what can you do if the great topvar experts do not know anything and cannot verify the information, but CSV is like an elephant ... For you it makes no sense, because instead of admitting that you wrote nonsense and lies, you started funeral songs about "how cool it was in the USSR "...
    41. 0
      6 October 2021 18: 08
      Pilot-cosmonaut, Hero of Russia Mikhail Kornienko criticized the idea of ​​director Klim Shipenko to shoot a part of the feature film "Challenge" at the International Space Station. Kornienko, who, while on the ISS, himself filmed a series of documentaries "A Year in Orbit", which gained millions of views on YouTube, does not share Shipenko's enthusiasm. Julia Peresild and the director will fly to the ISS for 10 days for 2 billion rubles.
      The film "T-34" grossed 2,3 billion rubles with a budget of 600 million rubles. The highest-grossing films of 2019 - "Ice" and "Policeman from the Ruble" - had a budget of about one hundred million rubles. How much will the film "Call" cost if on the ISS for 10 days for 2 billion rubles?
      1. +1
        6 October 2021 19: 02
        This is 2 billion from the budget, i.e. from our own pockets, from pensions and social programs, etc., not from our own pockets. , as a rule, they reduce it to zero in 1-1 months.
      2. +1
        6 October 2021 22: 55
        Quote: dort
        How much will the film "Challenge" cost if it is on the ISS for 10 days for 2 billion rubles?


        I have always been amazed at the narrow-mindedness of Internet hamsters, who do not see beyond their noses or see no further than thrown manuals into the network, which with enviable consistency pick up laughing

        The Challenge project attracted new clients. We have already signed agreements with new participants in space flight for a much larger amount than your notorious "two billion" rubles laughing
    42. -2
      6 October 2021 19: 26
      Quote: orionvitt
      I read the comments and frankly became sad. What happened to the site. They were flooded with crowds of infantile liberoids, shrieking vsepalschikov, stupid minors (and not so) "experts on all issues", ukropatriots and others. Previously, it was interesting to read the comments, I would even say exciting, but now it's just disgusting. How much dirt people have in their heads, in relation to their Homeland. Bored girls.

      Quote: Sten
      You are 100+, my thoughts expressed. They did not fly badly, they flew even worse. Everyone is waiting for some geniuses to construct a miracle rocket, and other super workers will assemble them. Where can these geniuses and super people come from? If they are 40 years old, already 3-4 generations of people are being told that everything is bad with us, but it is good only in the west. This flight, maybe some future genius, will motivate him to become a designer or a worker. There is no film yet, already the reviews write that the film is the bottom. I went to the branch to read the stones about how they docked, how they went to the station, etc., and here is one negative. Once again, the girls are bored, you have become :(

      lol Familiar handwriting! Well, if it comes to that, then you friends do not rearrange the beds, but change the girls. You look and criticism will diminish sharply ...
      winked
    43. 0
      6 October 2021 19: 38
      Quote: Barberry25
      and from Putin's 10 K not a single pensioner refused, as well as the mothers of children from school..why 1 channel should refuse?

      Master!!! Only a master can so elegantly compare the male genital organ with an ordinary finger! You earn your daily bread by hard and honest work ... winked
    44. +1
      7 October 2021 08: 01
      What's the point in this involvement of filmmakers? To be promoted? Or did Ernst and Rogozin want more money for their empty "projects"? We love to cut the budget!
    45. +1
      7 October 2021 08: 08
      A completely mediocre, stupid, meaningless undertaking. Causes only irritation and anger. Especially for retirees, who will soon have to work up to a hundred years without a pension. How is it. There is not enough money in the pension fund! And why the hell would they be enough ?! Fly, pigeons, fly ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"