Lukashenko: In the event of a military conflict, Belarus will be supported by the entire western part of the RF Armed Forces

President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko made a statement related to the topic of national security. In an interview with the American television channel CNN, the Belarusian president denied the statement that Russia was absorbing Belarus. According to the President of Belarus, the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation are creating such an alliance, which in the future is stronger than any unitary one.

Lukashenko:

The accession of Belarus to Russia, which is constantly talked about in the West, is stupidity.

According to the Belarusian leader, he and Vladimir Putin are "smart enough to create a powerful alliance of two independent states."

At the same time, Lukashenko warned the Western countries, NATO, against carrying out military provocations against the Belarusian state.

According to the President of Belarus, in the event of a military conflict, Belarus will be supported by "the entire western part of the RF Armed Forces." Apparently, Alexander Lukashenko was referring to the Western Military District of Russia, whose troops took part in the recent military exercises at the training grounds of Belarus together with Belarusian servicemen.

Lukashenko added that with statements about the readiness of Russian troops to support Minsk in the event of an armed conflict, in the event of aggression against Belarus, he does not frighten the West, but states a fact.

The Belarusian president pointed out that now there is no talk of creating any outposts in the west of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. But if it is needed, then, as Lukashenko pointed out, Moscow and Minsk can create them within one month.

Minsk pointed out that the coordination and efficiency of actions during the joint exercises showed this.

Also in the interview, they talked about refugees who are trying to get to the EU through Belarus. Answering the question of Matthew Chance, Lukashenko noted that accusations against Minsk about allegedly deliberate delivery of refugees by the Belarusian side to the Polish and Lithuanian borders are absurd. Lukashenka invited him to visit the border areas to see for himself. The President of the Republic of Belarus added that neighboring Poland is waging an insane campaign, introducing, among other things, a state of emergency on its eastern border.

American journalists are preparing to present the full interview the other day. The first excerpts from it were published by Belarusian information resources.

Comments

[Mountain shooter]

Dad grew bolder. He straightened his shoulders. I am not threatening, he says, I state ...

[Peak]

Lukashenko: In the event of a military conflict, Belarus will be supported by the entire western part of the RF Armed Forces

Quote: Mountain Shooter

I am not threatening, he says, I state ...

If we also take into account the recent statement of Alexander Grigorievich that he considers a thousand-kilometer border with Ukraine - potential front line , then perhaps under certain conditions he can count on help from the South, from the Crimea, which he stubbornly refuses to recognize.

And the informal members of the CSTO - the DPR and LPR corps - will strike at the flank of the nedoreikh ...

[Finches]

There are our military specialists in Belarus, but the deployment of full-fledged army units of the Russian Armed Forces is necessary - then there will not even be provocations from the West! There will be yapping, but no provocations!

[ugol2]

Why make the already sick people nervous?
And so, Old Man said - FOR A MONTH
If required, everything will be.

[Maikcg]

While Belarus is a "strong and independent state" according to the AGL, it is a buffer territory where you can arrange an Armageddian without regrets when NATO tanks roll in there (Polish Abrams ) with dreams of a blitzkrieg to Moscow. So there is no need for parts either, do not expose them to the first blow. If it becomes a Belarusian federal district, everything will be fine, but for now it will be fine.

[Normann]

Belarus is not defenseless, you just can't roll in ...

[evgen1221]

And in the event of a conflict, the Russian Federation will be supported by the eastern flank of the BC, or again, we are an independent country, our hut from the edge?

[Seryoga64]

Quote: evgen1221

or again, we are an independent country, our hut on the edge?

Well, how is it "a hut on the edge" If they are attacked?
You can't sit out in the bushes here

[Peak]

Quote: evgen1221

And in the event of a conflict, the Russian Federation will be supported by the eastern flank of the BC, or again, we are an independent country, our hut from the edge?

"Good", however, you have an opinion about the Belarusians, since you admit that they may remain indifferent to the attack on us ...

[Maikcg]

They could, for example, in Syria, get combat experience on a relaxed basis. But their hut is on the edge. So yes, we admit it.

[Roman1970_1]

Of course, remain indifferent. Do not doubt

[Normann]

The conflict is likely to take place initially on the territory of Belarus.

[askort154]

A union state with Russia, that's good. It would be even better - RB as part of the Russian Federation.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: askort154

It would be even better - RB as part of the Russian Federation.

But why?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Why are states expanding? Why does the USA need Texas? Why do we need Siberia?

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

Why does the US need Texas?

And why, then, Sasha Canada Narpimer is not attached to themselves?
Belarus is an independent state and is not eager to be part of the Russian Federation
And an extra voice in the UN will not hurt

[Sergey Averchenkov]

And who told you that they did not join? Find at least one difference in US and Canadian policy. I don’t feel the difference between myself and the Belarusian ... why not together?

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

And who told you that they did not join

This is when Canada became 51 states?

Find at least one difference in US and Canadian policy.

Find at least one difference in the policy of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus

why not together?

Have you asked the Belarusians?
Well, at least on the site. There are many of them here
Well, read the comments below

[Sergey Averchenkov]

By the way, I am also 64 ... that means 64th year of birth. Is that why you are Serega64? Sorry if you made a mistake.
Differences in US and Canadian policy please. It's so easy. You will find it and I will apologize. Quebec maybe?
I didn’t ask Belarusians - it’s just my desire ... Maybe I’m wrong.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

By the way, I am also 64 ... that means 64th year of birth. You are therefore Serega64

My age

Differences in US and Canadian policies please

Lukashenka never recognized Crimea as ours

I didn't ask Belarusians - just my desire ..

So ask for interest

[Sergey Averchenkov]

What will you do if you are 65? Yes, it doesn't matter, I'm sorry, but a little funny. Sorry one more time. :)
And now on the case - the difference in the policy of the United States and Canada. Please be kind.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

And now on the case - the difference in the policy of the United States and Canada. Please be so kind

I will not answer, because Canada is a faithful henchman of America and they themselves do not decide anything

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Thanks. Again the text of the message is short. But thanks.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

Again the text of the message is short.

I don't like long tests
And I don't know how to write them

But thanks.

And you

[Normann]

I am only for, and very many are only for, but also many are against. A referendum would decide.

[Prisoner]

In order to be good neighbors, it is not necessary to be steamed in a communal apartment.

[askort154]

Prisoner .....In order to be good neighbors, it is not necessary to be steamed in a communal apartment

Ukraine was also a good neighbor.

[Peak]

Quote: askort154

Ukraine was also a good neighbor.

Nothing, nothing , we will put things in order on the outskirts...

[Prisoner]

No, it wasn't. The rabid have always been there. Less than in the Baltics, but there were.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Captive

The rabid have always been there. Less than in the Baltics, but there were.

Western urka.ina has always hated Russia

[Kot_Kuzya]

Quote: askort154

Ukraine was also a good neighbor.

And when was Ukraine a "good neighbor"? Ukraine has ALWAYS positioned itself as "Non-Russia" at best, under Kuchma and Kravchuk, and shamelessly stole from Russia and demanded subsidies. And since 2004, Ukraine has become an open "Anti-Russia".

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Was not. "Moskolyaki" began in the 90s.

[Gardamir]

It would be even better - RB as part of the Russian Federation.

Buy yesterday's newspaper Sobesednik, which lists the territories that Russia has donated over the past 30 years. Then you want to annex Belarus, but for some reason against the annexation of Donbass. You can join Abkhazia and South Ossetia ...

[askort154]

Gardamir Buy yesterday's newspaper Interlocutor ...

Thank you, I don’t smoke. But essentially.
The Russian Federation is a single organism. And the allies are temporary workers, while it is profitable for them, they "allied", tomorrow they can go over to another camp. It is good if there are no joint ventures with this "ally", especially in the military-industrial complex. Examples? Ukraine ! We are still engaged in "import substitution", setting up the production of what was produced jointly in the USSR. Today we have a lot of joint ventures with Belarus, there are no guarantees that sooner or later it will "change its mind" to be an ally of Russia. And this will be the "Ukrainian rake". Today Belarus has the biggest debt to Russia - 12 billion dl. And if she were a part of the Russian Federation, then she would not be a "debtor", but a member of the family. Is it really not clear. If you return all the current-former members of the Russian Federation, you will get a "new-USSR".
And Donbass is a different topic.

[Normann]

Compared

Abkhazia and South Ossetia

with RB which is at the turn.

[El Barto]

You are confusing Russia and the Russian Federation. Belarus and so Russia. As well as RF. As well as Ukraine (only as usual its treacherous part, a bunch of traitors from all over the world and from the Russian Federation and from the Republic of Belarus, everything is there).

The Germans, too, have one people, but there are three states: the Federal Republic of Germany, Austria, Switzerland.

Why is it necessary for the Republic of Belarus to enter the Russian Federation? It is enough to have a union of equal republics as in the USSR

[Dmitry_6]

Switzerland and Germany? these are those who waged a "bad war" against each other, did not take prisoners in principle? And the decline of the Austrian Empire was the work of the Germans (Prussia). Everything is always difficult for neighbors.

[El Barto]

However, they are all Germans. And these are not just neighbors, but really one people. Although our Germans are remembered in the GDR, they were more similar to us and to the Poles than to the Westerners. In everything and in appearance and character

[Kot_Kuzya]

Quote: askort154

A union state with Russia, that's good. It would be even better - RB as part of the Russian Federation.

What for? The union of two countries can be quite strong and effective, for example, the union of the United States and Britain, they always act as a single monolith and support each other. We must take this Anglo-Saxon example and create a strong Russian-Belarusian alliance.

[Normann]

Rather like a feudal lord and his vassal.

[From Tomsk]

And then Lukashenka will issue an invoice that he took the entire blow of NATO.))

[Dmitry_6]

There is still no blow, but already ..)))) May the hand of the giver not dry up for ever and ever!

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

***
Yaki are brave But father - at Yago ў Kramli dzyadzka ...
***

[Seryoga64]

I can't imagine who wants to attack our neighbor and partner

Also in the interview, they talked about refugees who are trying to get into the building through Belarus. Lukashenko noted that accusations against Minsk about the allegedly deliberate delivery of refugees by the Belarusian side to the Polish and Lithuanian borders are absurd. L

So Nata starts wars, breeds refugees, but again they are not to blame

[Normann]

So the Kremlin's hand is everywhere

[Graz]

you say supported, but why don’t you recognize Crimea, mustachioed?

[Troll]

In the year 2015 or 2016, he already said that Crimea is Russian. You probably want Belarus to recognize the Russian Crimea?
But a question for you: why the largest Russian companies do not work directly with Crimea? Why don't they "recognize" him? When / if you answer, then you will understand why Belarus "does not recognize Crimea"
..
Why "recognize" when it is possible to work with Crimea without it, which is what the Belarusians are doing on a campaign.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

I still can't understand why Belarus needs independence? I perfectly understand why Lukashenka and his entourage personally need independent Belarus. But why do ordinary Belarusians need this independence? What does she give them?
Moreover, independence is purely nominal, and without Russia it would have long been independent in the knee-elbow position among the Anglo-Saxons, like Ukraine.

[Egoza]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

I perfectly understand why Lukashenka and his entourage personally need independent Belarus. But why do ordinary Belarusians need this independence? What does she give them?

About the environment - right. And to ordinary Belarusians ... probably, this is a deep, age-old, subconscious fear of other people's masters, but now it seems like he himself, and lives well, is in charge of his land. This is the difference from Ukraine, where they immediately began to rob their own people and ask for help from the West, hoping for a freebie, like the Poles.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Egoza

probably it is deep, age-old,

After the collapse of Greater Russia (USSR), everyone began to live worse, everyone. I mean the people, of course. When we were together, no one dared to utter a word, and once Finland was part of Russia for as much as 108 years.
Well, is this "deep, secular" inscribed? Just to be?

[Black5Raven]

Quote: Egoza

but now it seems like he himself, and he lives well, he manages his own land. This is the difference from Ukraine, where they immediately began to rob their own people.

That is, according to official statistics, 34% of the population receive less than $ 194 per month and only 5.5% of the vaunted "papizzot". But ice palaces and court buildings were built as in Turkmenistan "rich and expensive".

[Egoza]

Quote: Black5Raven

That's why, according to official statistics, 34% of the population receive less than $ 194 per month.

In Ukraine, 38,3% receive less than $ 112,68

[Black5Raven]

Quote: Egoza

In Ukraine, 38,3% receive less than $ 112,68

Do you have any other answers except "In Ukraine"? As they point out the problems, the "superpower" immediately refers to Ukraine. What power, such comparisons.

[Troll]

Why does Russia need another region?
Canada and America live separately and nothing.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Troll

Why does Russia need another region?
Canada and America live separately and nothing.

Because we have always lived together. This is our civilizational advantage.
The Anglo-Saxons, especially the Americans, have a selfish-individualistic mentality. Look, in the USA it is customary to throw children after 18 into the wild, into the pampas.
And we have always lived as one big family. This is how the continuity of generations was achieved. And this has consolidated society better than any ideology.

[Troll]

>>> Always lived together ... <<

They lived together when they were considered one ethnos, one people. When only Russians lived on that common land. And as soon as the Russians were divided into Russians, Belarusians and Ukrainians, so each, soon, was cut and his own lot and stopped living together. There is a common story. And you can't easily return everything back.

Adult children are "thrown out" not only in America and not only by the Anglo-Saxons.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Cave xenophobia, when the villagers hate the townspeople, and the townspeople despise the villagers, is the lot of the most narrow-minded people.
"Ukrainians" and "Belarusians" are the designation of the place of residence. Well, like Siberians, Urals, St. Petersburg, Minsk, Kiev, etc. That is, pure convention. Siberians do not consider themselves a separate nation. Likewise, Belarusians and Ukrainians are not separate nations at all. But certain forces really need them to think so. Therefore, they play on their stupid chauvinism. It affects the weak-minded people.

[75 Sergey]

Unfortunately, statements about the "nation of Siberians" are already slipping through.
In my opinion, in Russia there should be one language and one culture ... and one nationality, or at least with an adjective - Russian.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: 75Sergey

Unfortunately, statements about the "nation of Siberians" are already slipping through.

There will always be idiots who consider themselves better than others for no reason. They are called "snobs". But there will always be an overwhelming minority of them, albeit vociferous.

[75 Sergey]

But while their cause lives on and wins, the collapse of the USSR is a vivid confirmation of this.

[Black5Raven]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

Because we have always lived together. This is our civilizational advantage.

Together - is it after a series of wars and when the present territories of Belarus were finally absorbed by the Republic of Ingushetia?

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Black5Raven

Together - is it after a series of wars and when the present territories of Belarus were finally absorbed by the Republic of Ingushetia?

Tell me, why Belarusians need independence? What does it give other than a feeling of deep but senseless satisfaction for some?

[Black5Raven]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

What does it give other than a feeling of deep but senseless satisfaction for some?

I wanted to ask, what does an attempt to drag everyone and everything into their cauldron with crabs give the residents of the Russian Federation, and you have already managed to answer. Amazing.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

In general, you have no idea why Belarus needs independence. Therefore, you cling to the most absurd thesis: "First of all, independence from Russia." Although it does not smell of any independence from Russia.
Do you want to be dependent on Poland? Because Belarus cannot be completely autonomous, it does not have the resources for this.

[Alexga]

Tell me, why Belarusians need independence? What does it give other than a feeling of deep but senseless satisfaction for some?

Tell me, in your opinion, how is life in the Russian Federation better than in the Republic of Belarus?

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: AlexGa

Tell me, in your opinion, how is life in the Russian Federation better than in the Republic of Belarus?

The fact that the Russians do not need to think what will happen if external support stops, since Russia is counting only on itself, in contrast to Belarus, which depends critically on Russia.

[Kot_Kuzya]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

I still can't understand why Belarus needs independence? I perfectly understand why Lukashenka and his entourage personally need independent Belarus. But why do ordinary Belarusians need this independence? What does she give them?
Moreover, independence is purely nominal, and without Russia it would have long been independent in the knee-elbow position among the Anglo-Saxons, like Ukraine.

And what can they, ordinary Belarusians, do? But Father himself harshly crushes all politicians who only vyat about the policy of joining Russia. That is why ordinary Belarusians have no other option in the elections than to vote for Luka, there is no one else for them, since other candidates are outright traitors like Tupanovskaya. If Father hadn't pressed pro-Russian politicians, then already last year the presidential candidate, who announced in his election campaign about the annexation of Belarus to Russia, would have every chance of defeating Luka, and certainly would have scored more than 10%, which Tupanovskaya gained in the past. year.

[Normann]

Many people want to feel independent, and when you ask the question why - general phrases, and the fact that the Republic of Belarus de facto without the Russian Federation will not be understood by a few of the zmagars.

[Seld]

When you read about the war, you want to ask a journalist:
1. How many military academies have you graduated from?
2. Who should fight with whom?
3. What forces and resources on both sides?
4. How much does a journalist pay for a blizzard about the war?

[Seld]

Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich

I still can't understand why Belarus needs independence? I perfectly understand why Lukashenka and his entourage personally need independent Belarus. But why do ordinary Belarusians need this independence? What does she give them?
Moreover, independence is purely nominal, and without Russia it would have long been independent in the knee-elbow position among the Anglo-Saxons, like Ukraine.

What for?
If we unite, how much will a liter of gasoline cost both there and there? How much will a kilo of sugar be everywhere? Communal? Socialist? Workplaces? Pensions ... Enough for everyone after unification? If your personal salary collapses, are all the rules? Do you personally mind if your vacancy is cut? The increase in monetary mass for you is just empty words, obviously.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: seld

If we unite, how much will a liter of gasoline cost both there and there? How much will a kilo of sugar be everywhere? Communal? Socialist? Workplaces? Pensions ... Enough for everyone after unification? If your salary collapses personally, are all the rules?

Why should gasoline, communal apartments, sugar go up after the annexation of Belarus? Why does my salary have to collapse?
Crimea was annexed and no price cataclysms happened. And after the Sugs, Crimea had to be practically rebuilt. Whereas in Belarus, many enterprises are quite modern and work properly.

[Black5Raven]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

Why should gasoline, communal apartments, sugar go up after the annexation of Belarus?

How much is a petrol after 2014? Exactly as with prices and tariffs That is why in every topic about domestic politics it rises so that it grows incessantly.

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

Why does my salary have to collapse?

In dollar terms, it collapsed, remind you about 30 rubles per dollar?

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

While in Belarus many enterprises are quite modern

Name a dozen. And preferably not unprofitable. And I'll tell you, smuggled tobacco and everything related to alcohol.

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

and work properly.

One problem is chronically unprofitable.

[Seld]

Quote: Troll

Why does Russia need another region?
Canada and America live separately and nothing.

What a good and simple question ....
The answer is mega-complex and ambiguous!
The propagandists from the middle of the last century think of the category of "unification". With a complete lack of understanding of the interpenetration of economies and political interests in reality. I am sure: such people use a computer only to print out an application to the social security.
The "separatists", on the other hand, lack corny convincing arguments for benefits. Questions such as "what will happen tomorrow after the unification, if ..." are completely ignored.
And the mantras "leave everything as it is" also do not work, because according to dialectics, the world must develop.
An attempt to start the process organically and by itself leads to conflicts. The human factor is becoming so "diverse" that there are not enough coffins.
Whatever you do, but "the man stubbornly crawls into the cemetery."

[APASUS]

It's time to place our warehouses of weapons and ammunition on the territory of Belarus. In case of a conflict, it will help to instantly form subdivisions and transfer them to help Belarusians if anything happens. After all, this is exactly what the Americans do.

[75 Sergey]

In the 41st, this was already done, the first blow is the most powerful + the effect of surprise + the time to make a decision, which is accompanied by the loss of part of the territories.

[Seld]

Quote: Graz

you say supported, but why don’t you recognize Crimea, mustachioed?

God forbid, if he recognizes !!!!!
Why? - Go to study at MGIMO.
In the first or second year they will explain.

[75 Sergey]

Old Man calmed down ... I wonder how long?

[rotmistr60]

Moscow and Minsk can create them within one month.

Maybe Lukashenka should think today about whether the enemy will give this month to create outposts against him? Perhaps today it is necessary to have at least one Russian base near its western borders?

[demchuk.ig]

I don’t like muddy people. From outright scum you even know what to expect, but you don’t know how to turn, where you will stab you.

[Humpty]

Given the current state of affairs, Belarus cannot be anything other than the pre-empire. In 41 Minsk fell on the seventh day of the war.

[Ivanushka Ivanov]

Some commentators are surprised, they say, but what does he not want to join the Russian Federation? In all seriousness. The Lord took pity on the Belarusians like the poor, gave them Old Man. And you wish them harm.

When everything was falling apart, Shushkevich sat there. That's where ... so ... - managed to destroy quite a good launch pad in a couple of years - to the point of complete foundation. In Moscow, Belarusians were the lowest caste of guest workers, below Moldovans.

They are poor. The Belarusian got on the Belka train - he was going home. Worked for several months somewhere in the basement on finishing. So what. A couple of hours later - in shit - and his hard-earned money (which he was carrying for the family) flew like candy wrappers (in the literal sense) - it was a demonstration of something.

Two Belarusians are former military men. Prapor and retired captain or major. On leave from earnings (the time of the late Shushkevich) they go home. The major - a solid mustachioed man in body, with dignity in manners - is assigned to the first floor of the reserved seat. After the feast, the ensign went to his place - for the second. I was awakened by the murmur of a river, unnatural for a train. Man, get up! And then a respectable man sat down, he did not understand what was happening, he was all over the place. Oh, you bastard! Prapor ... ny ... what am I going to tell my wife now ?!

These are the Belarusians. Without a father (and not a wolf in sheep's clothing), they can't.

For those who, in all seriousness, consider the modern Russian criminal syndicate to be something harmless and fluffy, let me remind you of an illustrative story.

When Old Man started, the Belarusians were fed by Mr. Kaliy. There was simply no other, or there was too little. Belarusians and Russians (uralkali) began to cooperate in this field, the price of potash fertilizers went up, everyone was happy. Except for the insatiable Russian oligarchs. And now they bring up a sidekick to him, sell your dad your desk, we like it. You're our sidekick. He says: yes, well, since there is no other way, but come on, sidekick, at a fair price, I need to feed the people. They give him a third. Send intimidation, scams. It ended with the fact that Old Man closed one of the dickheads at home. Well, Sidorenko - maybe you've heard such a name. Well, it was a high-profile case ... As a result, Uralkalliy committed sabotage and economic suicide, dropping the price of fertilizers for many years to come. So do not get it to anyone!

Because of this "act of partnership" for almost 10 years, Batka lost more on potassium than he was given gas. A trifle, but speaks volumes.

Then Medvedev, being president, hysterical on the air: give me MAZ to KAMAZ. Here's 49%. I want!

This is from the high-profile moments. And how many other encroachments were there? Therefore, gentlemen, wealthy moles, do not wish your brother what you do not wish for yourself. This is not good.

And at the expense of Crimea ... think, ask yourself: what percentage of the total Belarusian exports go to Europe? It turns out, about the same as in Russia. If, because of the Crimea, Belarusians lose this percentage on sanctions, who will feed them? Sergey Anxious?

[Amadeus Ivanov]

I'm interested in something else! And if a conflict happens in the Russian Federation in the south of the country? After all, Old Man said that not a single Belarusian would fight abroad in Belarus! Why should Russian people fight for Belarus?

[aleks700]

Belarus will be supported by Russia. Will Russia be supported by Belarus?

[Ivanushka Ivanov]

And who, in your opinion, suffered more than others during the Second World War?

If a politician is trying to sincerely defend the herd entrusted to him, including from the Russian oligarchs, why does this annoy you? Can you separate "flies from cutlets", as they used to say, a storehouse of conscience and reason, that is, Russia itself from Russian oligarchs? Or is everything the same for you?

At the moment Belarus is the only country of the "friends" that has never set Russia up.

And personally, will you go to die for the Russian oligarchs? Will the "Russian" oligarchs go to die for Russia?

[aleks700]

For example, I support my father in his desire to protect the country from the oligarchs. It's not about that. So the Ukrainian invasion of Crimea, Rostov, Belgorod began. Belarus will support Russia. I do not like Ukrainian, put another name.

[Ivanushka Ivanov]

Of course it will support, there is the CSTO. Militarily, Belarus is closer to Russia than it might seem. It has its own chemistry.

[Seld]

Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich

Quote: seld

If we unite, how much will a liter of gasoline cost both there and there? How much will a kilo of sugar be everywhere? Communal? Socialist? Workplaces? Pensions ... Enough for everyone after unification? If your salary collapses personally, are all the rules?

Why should gasoline, communal apartments, sugar go up after the annexation of Belarus? Why does my salary have to collapse?
Crimea was annexed and no price cataclysms happened. And after the Sugs, Crimea had to be practically rebuilt. Whereas in Belarus, many enterprises are quite modern and work properly.

Because you have to go to study. And there, in the "study", they will explain everything to you. Or do you propose to read you a short course in political economics? Macroeconomic laws? On the forum, on your knee?
Regarding Crimea: You are a strange, but obviously a good person with a bad memory. The economy of the Russian Federation after the annexation of the Crimea still shook !!!!!!! Perhaps not as drastically as it could have happened if the annexation of Crimea proceeded on the basis of many legal and by-laws with the government of, say, Crimea. For example, monetary, foreign exchange, agreements; administrative and economic acts. Etc.
Let me explain with one example: the annexation of Crimea did not entail a banal currency exchange procedure, the coordination of tax rules, tariffs, the coordination and transfer of the international obligations of the Crimea (?!?!?!?!?!) And the delimitation of administrative and economic zones of responsibility, like this it was in the case of the union of two germaniums.
I will say seditiousness: Crimea has actually been "tied" to the Russian Federation. No strings attached. Well, even on the basis of a referendum ... All the existing realities of the Russian Federation were simply transferred to the territory of Crimea.
This will not work with Belarus if everything is done according to the laws of economics and world law in the interests of the citizens of both countries.

[Seld]

Quote: aleks700

Belarus will be supported by Russia. Will Russia be supported by Belarus?

Read the history of Romania's involvement in the First World War. This will be the answer to your question ........ It was funny there ...

[Rin]

Yes, the aging leaders began to tear off the roof