Turkish official: Erdogan and Putin agreed to maintain the status quo in Syrian Idlib

66

The Turkish press is discussing the visit of Recep Erdogan to Russia. Recall that Erdogan flew to Sochi for a dialogue with Vladimir Putin. At the same time, rather concise information has been published on the official website of the President of the Russian Federation - mainly about economic and humanitarian cooperation between Moscow and Ankara.

Meanwhile, Turkish officials from Erdogan's delegation say that one of the important topics for the talks was the Syrian issue. In particular, the theme of the Syrian Idlib. If you believe the statements of representatives of the Turkish authorities, then Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Vladimir Putin agreed "to maintain the status quo on Idlib."



It is noted that the Turkish servicemen "will continue to monitor the situation in Idlib at the previously established observation posts." A Turkish official, whose name the Turkish press does not name, said it was "an important agreement between the two presidents."

Earlier, we will remind, Vladimir Putin raised the issue of the illegitimate presence in Syria of a number of foreign military contingents. According to the President of the Russian Federation, contingents that do not have a UN mandate or were not invited by the official authorities of the SAR should leave Syrian territory as soon as possible.

Now, if you again believe the unnamed Turkish official, to whom Turkish reporters refer, the issue of the withdrawal of Turkish troops from the SAR, including from Idlib, is no longer on the agenda. It is worth noting that the Turkish troops to stay in Syria have neither a UN mandate nor an invitation from official Damascus, and therefore de jure are illegitimate in the SAR.

Against this background, the Syrian and Turkish press note that the day when the Russian and Turkish presidents met in Sochi, in the north and north-west of Syria, turned out to be the calmest in the past few months.
  • Facebook / Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    30 September 2021 07: 34
    Turkish official: Erdogan and Putin agreed to maintain the status quo in Syrian Idlib
    This will have to be looked at ... carefully.
    1. +9
      30 September 2021 07: 37
      According to the President of the Russian Federation, contingents that do not have a UN mandate or were not invited by the official authorities

      You might think that the US takes a mandate from the UN every time or is waiting for an invitation!
      1. +9
        30 September 2021 07: 47
        "the right of the strong" ... they practically monopolized it and are very indignant / furious when others begin to do the same!
        1. 0
          30 September 2021 07: 58
          Quote: rocket757
          and they are very indignant / furious,

          And the sanctions are imposed
          1. +2
            30 September 2021 08: 45
            Raging ... there are no restrictions at all.
      2. +2
        30 September 2021 07: 57
        Quote: Egoza
        You might think that the US takes a mandate from the UN every time or is waiting for an invitation!

        As soon as they take and receive the invitation, the earth will begin to rotate in the opposite direction.
    2. +1
      30 September 2021 07: 55
      Quote: rocket757
      Turkish official:

      Some strange official
      an unnamed Turkish official,
      1. +6
        30 September 2021 09: 02
        Quote: Seryoga64
        Some strange official
        an unnamed Turkish official,

        It looks like a fake.
        1. +1
          30 September 2021 10: 58
          Quote: tihonmarine
          It looks like a fake.

          What does Turkish have to do with
      2. +1
        30 September 2021 09: 56
        Quote: Seryoga64
        Some strange official

        winked
        1. +1
          30 September 2021 10: 59
          Exactly he. I even hid my face winked
    3. +4
      30 September 2021 08: 40
      Quote: rocket757
      Turkish official: Erdogan and Putin agreed to maintain the status quo in Syrian Idlib
      This will have to be looked at ... carefully.

      Judging by the fact that there is no news of a joint press conference following the talks, there is no particular success. But if the Turks do not leave Idlib, then they were able to insist on their interests at the expense of the interests of Syria and Russia.
      1. +1
        30 September 2021 08: 46
        Boom wait and see what things go ... or not.
        1. 0
          30 September 2021 18: 15
          Sorry colleague Hrych disappeared somewhere.
          It would be interesting to listen to him. hi
      2. -1
        1 October 2021 16: 13
        the question is not whether they will leave or not, but WHEN will they leave ..
    4. 0
      30 September 2021 10: 34
      I do not know . but it is interesting - did Gazprom receive a "take or pay" contract from the Turks? at 18-20 g there was an overabundance of cheap LNG - this is the key to the smiles of two friends
  2. +8
    30 September 2021 07: 41
    How is the status quo? This is when ours, accidentally, bomb the Turks and everyone smiles and swears friendship?
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 07: 50
      NDR-791.As you wish, but personally, I see Russian-Turkish relations only in this way:

      And so it is, if you remove the black hand with the knife. hi
      1. 0
        30 September 2021 07: 59
        Quote: askort154
        if you remove the black hand with a knife

        But you don't need to put an olive branch there either.
    2. 0
      30 September 2021 07: 53
      Only one has a dagger. Do we have leverage over Turkey? Most likely no. And business tomatoes, gas, nuclear energy are all profit. And this cow is sacred.
      1. nnm
        +10
        30 September 2021 08: 04
        Why not? Everything new is well forgotten old. For example, there is a lever in the form of Kurdistan with the PKK.
        Plus, oppositional sentiments are strong, which was shown by the elections in Istanbul.
        1. +1
          30 September 2021 09: 01
          Well, what about Kurdistan? It is beautiful on the map, but not on earth. That same Iraq showed that when the authorities and the Persians let the field commanders point donkeys with bucks, so the entire Iraqi Kurdistan with Kirkuk collapsed. Moreover, the Kurds were ousted even from the regions that they had occupied since 2003.

          Which Kurdistan are you going to support? The Arfinsky are the most ideological, but they have already been pressed to the nail, and in the mountains they are being finished off. And the number is not the same. Eurfat under the Americans and their norms, even if all the other Kurds are cut, they will score a hookah for themselves and try to fish villages in the muddy water. The northern ones - so they have no weapons, no numbers, and there is no desire to die, knowing that the southern ones will not help them, either. Hasaksky? So they are tightly under the Americans, and every 3-4 months, they try to drive the SAA out of the city, directly attacking, shelling and storming government troops.
        2. -1
          30 September 2021 10: 51
          They surrendered everything ... and for a long time
      2. +5
        30 September 2021 08: 08
        Do you want to say that the Turks are doing business in Russia, were they allowed to build a stream and a nuclear power plant for Christ's sake?
        Like: "Well, we don't really need all this, actually. But, if you really want to, then so be it, we don't mind."
        1. +1
          30 September 2021 15: 03
          Turks are like our businessmen, and very large ones do business. And hence the conclusion. We cannot put pressure on the Turks, as they do on us. For money. And moreover, we are in a worse situation, the Turks can take by the throat our logistics to Syria and not only.
    3. +3
      30 September 2021 08: 05
      Quote: NDR-791
      As you wish, but personally, I see Russian-Turkish relations only in this way:

      Such are not only Russian-Turkish relations, but relations between everyone and everyone.
      Homo homini lupus est.
      1. -1
        30 September 2021 08: 17
        Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Homo homini lupus est.

        the main thing is to act according to the accepted rules and understand when they cease to work
    4. -2
      30 September 2021 08: 10
      VVP tastes so-so. I could have chosen a "partner" more beautifully. laughing
      A very offensive drawing for a sultan.
    5. +3
      30 September 2021 09: 39
      Quote: NDR-791
      As you wish, but personally, I see Russian-Turkish relations only in this way:

      some kind of homosexual. Ugh....
  4. -1
    30 September 2021 07: 52
    Now, if you believe again

    Gyyyyy laughing
    What then to talk about
    Discuss what the grandmothers came up with on the bench?
    Good activity
  5. +7
    30 September 2021 07: 52
    We do not know anything about what VVP and the Sultan agreed on, and the conjectures of the journalists (Turkish) are Wishlist, against the background of constant pressure on Idlib. On the part of both the Russian Aerospace Forces and the SAR. These Turkish strongholds will not interfere ... They will bypass them, and they are quietly evacuated, as it was already ...
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 18: 05
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      They will bypass them, and they quietly evacuate, as it was already ...

      If everything remained as it is, it would be a victory for the Sultan.
      I see no reason to disperse so quietly. They would tell.
      And since there is silence, then the Sultan went to think - what should he do? hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. 0
    30 September 2021 08: 07
    I wonder if oil tankers are also going to Turkey at this time?
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 15: 04
      The Kurds took control of them.
  7. +6
    30 September 2021 08: 13
    Something tells me that the Turkish wishes tell us,
    not facts.
  8. +4
    30 September 2021 08: 16
    Earlier, we will remind, Vladimir Putin raised the issue of the illegitimate presence in Syria of a number of foreign military contingents.

    We are at VO, we also raise this issue regularly. So what ?!
    Judging by the fact that our press has already forgotten about the negotiations, the "breakthrough" did not take place. Only one thing is welcome - "maintaining the status quo in Idlib."
    That is, Turkey is not a step out of Syria. The border zone and Idlib remain the fiefdom of Turkey. And what is there to be happy about ?! The fact that our tourists will continue to export tens of billions of dollars to Turkey.
    1. -1
      30 September 2021 19: 52
      Better to Turkey than to fucking Sochi and Crimea. Who was he will understand.
  9. 0
    30 September 2021 08: 27
    Erdogan leaked, Putin introduces:
    https://youtu.be/CEKmY6G2ZOA
    the territory of southern Idlib comes under the control of Assad,
    we'll see the rest.
    1. +1
      30 September 2021 13: 33
      Podolyaka is an expert on all issues. He may be right, but all his words are based, as he says, on Syrian sources. In my opinion, all interesting to all, it is too early to draw any conclusions, I hope that Podolyaka will be right.
      1. 0
        30 September 2021 13: 37
        Quote: suhorukofal
        He may be right, but all his words are based, as he says, on Syrian sources.

        There, without Syrian sources, a picture is drawn, the sources are already proof.
        Yes - they are not unambiguous yet.
  10. -6
    30 September 2021 08: 53
    Now, if you again believe the unnamed Turkish official, to whom Turkish reporters refer, the issue of the withdrawal of Turkish troops from the SAR, including from Idlib, is no longer on the agenda.
    I think you can trust a Turk in this matter more than our pro-government media. What can you say here? It sucks that such an issue "is no longer on the agenda" because it undermines the confidence of the allies in our country, which is already not up to par, and for the Syrians it will most likely be a disappointment in cooperation with us, which is very bad.
    1. -5
      30 September 2021 09: 10
      Turku to believe not to respect yourself. I believe in ours.
      1. -2
        30 September 2021 12: 29
        Quote: Fungus
        Turku to believe not to respect yourself. I believe in ours.

        Damn, stop throwing slogans, I wrote "in this issue", which is discussed here! I, too, "for all the good, against all the bad", but who believes whom does not affect the situation in which the Turks do what they want in the SAR and the situation does not change after the negotiations!
    2. +2
      30 September 2021 09: 24
      Quote: businessv
      I think you can trust a Turk in this matter more than our pro-government media.

      When these same Turks said that all observation posts in Idlib would remain in their places, and Assad's troops would leave the territories occupied during the offensive - was it also good to believe?
      Quote: businessv
      It sucks that such a question "is no longer on the agenda"

      Well, yes, the Turks will stay, they will simply reduce their presence in southern Idlib ... Until the next negotiations ...
      Quote: businessv
      for the Syrians, this will most likely be a disappointment in cooperation with us

      The Syrians themselves made many mistakes in this war, the Russian Federation is only acting out of the current situation.
      1. 0
        30 September 2021 12: 19
        Quote: Tzar
        The Syrians themselves made many mistakes in this war, the Russian Federation is only acting out of the current situation.
        Yes, if not for us, today it would be ISIS (prohibited in Russia)! And now, should we count the miscalculations of the SAR, or create a situation in which it would be unprofitable for the Turks to remain in Syria? The latter is preferable, otherwise what the hell are we there for ?! Everyone is annoyed by the agreements after the opposite was previously stated!
  11. +4
    30 September 2021 08: 54
    The games around Idlib continue. Is Putin expecting Erdogan to break the wood and leave Syria himself?
  12. -4
    30 September 2021 09: 12
    The Turks are investing in Idlib, turning it into a wealthy region of Syria.
    Indeed, apart from Latakia and the center of Damascus, all of Syria is in ruins.
    Someday they will annex Idlib and the north of Aleppo province. And at the referendum the population will support them in unison.
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 12: 22
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The Turks are investing in Idlib, turning it into a wealthy region of Syria.
      It was not the Turks who "turned" him, he was the richest before them, as far as it was possible in the SAR, because there are the most fertile lands and for life it was one of the most preferable in Syria. And the Turks have already annexed it, how else can you call their presence?
      1. +2
        30 September 2021 13: 06
        Annexation is a legal state act. The presence of troops is not annexation.
        And so ... Aleppo was the city of Aleppo in the Ottoman Empire. The second most populous.
        Erdogan has revanchist ambitions. And he is also a "land gatherer" smile
        1. 0
          30 September 2021 13: 13
          Quote: voyaka uh
          And so ... Aleppo was the city of Aleppo in the Ottoman Empire. The second most populous.
          Erdogan has revanchist ambitions. And he is also a "land gatherer"

          It is very strange that Erdogan did not intervene until the moment of the seizure of Aleppo by Assad. Aleppo + Idlib is a very fatty piece of Syria, with a motley ethnic composition, a large number of Turks. I really don't understand why he waited until only Idlib remained.
          1. 0
            30 September 2021 13: 20
            I was also surprised then.
            Iran actively participated in the siege and storming of the city of Aleppo. Maybe they did not agree with them, and Erdogan did not dare to contact both Assad and the Iranians at the same time?
            1. +4
              30 September 2021 13: 28
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Maybe they did not agree with them, and Erdogan did not dare to contact both Assad and the Iranians at the same time?

              Maybe. Several variants:
              1. Iran, Russia, Assad were categorically against it, right up to a direct war. I didn't want a tough conflict.
              2. Erdogan did not have as much power as after the coup in the same year. Or was busy with internal showdowns.
              3. Maybe Erdogan did not want to go there at all, after an unsuccessful coup, he decided to give in to the "hawks"
              4. It would be better if the Army fought and the generals thought about an external enemy than about internal squabbles. It was after the unsuccessful coup that Turkey began to fight more actively.

              Most likely a combination of these factors. External positions of Iran and Russia + internal instability.
        2. 0
          30 September 2021 20: 18
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Erdogan has revanchist ambitions. And he is also a "land gatherer"
          Well, he never hid it, it is not clear only why "too"? smile The GDP did this not out of convictions, but because of the situation, which was not in Russia's favor, and therefore "picked up" a little, and the Sultan acts differently - much bolder / bolder. Where we needed to act quickly, boldly and without looking back ... In short, the Sultan is a fine fellow for his country.
  13. 0
    30 September 2021 09: 18
    I don't know, the Syrians write that the Turks have begun to withdraw their troops from Idlib.
    But, as they say, take your word for it ...
    We are waiting for official messages.
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 12: 32
      Quote: Machete
      I don't know, the Syrians write that the Turks have begun to withdraw their troops from Idlib.
      Not a withdrawal, a partial relocation. Apparently, we agreed on something, but nothing will change dramatically, I think. We wait.
  14. 0
    30 September 2021 09: 20
    Erdogan and Putin agree to maintain the status quo in Syrian Idlib

    It could not be otherwise. Too many levers of pressure from Turkey on Russia.
  15. +1
    30 September 2021 09: 27
    Turkish an official whose name the Turkish press does not name, said it was "an important agreement between the two presidents."


    Well, or as an option: OBS (one grandmother said)
  16. -3
    30 September 2021 09: 48
    Something everywhere we have a status quo. Turkey has entered the Caucasus - the status quo. Turkey entered the Caspian - the status quo. Turkey has chopped off a piece of Syria - also the status quo. The Americans in Ukraine, the Russian lands under the Banderaites, too, apparently the status quo. Maybe we will also invade somewhere, for example, Constantinople and stay there, agree on the status. And will it be like winning once again? Have you checked the tomatoes? everything is fine - can you continue to trade?
    1. -5
      30 September 2021 10: 48
      Deer shut up!
      For us the main thing is TOMATOES!
  17. 0
    30 September 2021 10: 03
    the main thing is to act according to the accepted rules and understand when they cease to work ...

    You need to know the rules in order to develop your own rules.
  18. BAI
    -4
    30 September 2021 10: 41
    "The Quietest Day" The Turks fired at and nearly shot down a Russian helicopter. And what happens on turbulent days?
  19. -4
    30 September 2021 10: 47
    The Kremlin has surrendered its positions ...
  20. -3
    30 September 2021 10: 55
    Erdogan won again ????
    1. -1
      30 September 2021 13: 43
      Quote: Paul_Zibert
      Erdogan won again ????

      - Putin will introduce and everything will pass.
  21. +2
    30 September 2021 15: 51
    this Turkish chameleon cannot be trusted. keep it on a short leash.
  22. 0
    1 October 2021 15: 16
    The title photo is gorgeous for attentive citizens, as far as speaking facial expressions, position.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"