The Czech Republic finally excluded Rosatom from the tender for the construction of a power unit at the Dukovany NPP

92

The Czech Republic finally excluded the Russian "Rosatom" from the list of applicants for the construction of a new power unit at the Dukovany nuclear power plant, the corresponding law was signed by the country's President Milos Zeman.

The Czech Republic adopted a law excluding participation in the construction of a new power unit of any companies from Russia and China, thereby finally withdrawing the application of Rosatom. According to the law signed by the President of the Czech Republic, only those countries that "have joined the international agreement on state orders from 1996" are allowed to build and subsequently operate the power unit. Russia and China are not among them.



The fact that Russia will be removed from potential participants in the construction of the new power unit of the Dukovany nuclear power plant became known back in April this year after the scandal with the explosions in Moravia in 2014, in which Prague blamed Moscow. Later in June, the Chamber of Deputies (lower house) of the Czech Parliament excluded Russian and Chinese companies from the tender.

Thus, after the exclusion of the Russian Rosatom and the Chinese company China General Nuclear Power, only one contender remained for the $ 6 billion contract - Westinghouse, representing North America.

Meanwhile, some experts believe that by removing Russia and China from the construction tender and leaving only the United States, the Czech Republic may face an increase in the cost of building a power unit, and significantly. There is only one bidder, and only he sets the prices.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    92 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +17
      27 September 2021 17: 35
      Well Chekhov will be divorced for money.
      1. +26
        27 September 2021 17: 38
        Not only babos. Westinghouse CANNOT build a nuclear power plant !!! Ask the Chinese, Indians, or ask why in the year 16 2 units of the Vogtle nuclear power plant were not launched in the USA
        1. +7
          27 September 2021 17: 49
          RBC writes that in addition to the Americans, the French and South Koreans remained in the tender

          After that, the American Westinghouse, French EDF and South Korean KHNP remained among the candidates for participation in the tender for the completion of the nuclear power plant.


          Read more at RBC:
          https://www.rbc.ru/politics/27/09/2021/6151a8f49a794730f6c44ba7
          1. +1
            27 September 2021 18: 37
            joined the international agreement on state orders from 1996

            This is how much time they dug in the documents in order to justify their decision and find at least some kind of agreement, but simply put the reason
            1. +3
              27 September 2021 21: 36
              After the Czech Republic was included in the list of countries unfriendly to Russia, Rosatom would not conclude a contract with them.
              So the statement "The Czech Republic excluded Rosatom from the tender" is the same plan as "this grape is still green anyway"
          2. +6
            27 September 2021 19: 04
            South Koreans are subcontractors at Westinghouse in Vogtl, they did not build it with a pair, and the French, for the same time, the Finns cannot build the Olkiluoto NPP ... So one demon
            1. +2
              27 September 2021 21: 11
              Quote: Cowbra
              South Koreans - subcontractors at Westinghouse in Vogtle, didn't build it with steam

              So far, they have succeeded only with the Chinese, when the Chinese have invested a lot of their efforts and now for the same Poles
              “2033 is a realistic date, but everything depends on the decision of the Polish government. Technology matters. We have six nuclear reactors: four operational and two more under construction. We shouldn't change their design. This can significantly affect the schedule. We have the safest reactor with a completely passive safety system. It is a simpler solution, more efficient, and a record record in China, ”said Westinghouse President.
              https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/05/25/westinghouse-postroim-aes-v-polshe-v-srok-esli-produbliruem-kitayskiy-proekt

              "We must not change their design" - the Katai version has been worked out and any changes ...
              wherein...
              Alexander Uvarov, director of the autonomous non-profit organization to support the development of nuclear science, technology and education "AtomInfo-Center", notes that the Canadian owners of Westinghouse are categorically against the general contract, since it was on this that the previous owner of Toshiba got burned. “Therefore, Westinghouse will now go either in a consortium with someone like Shaw, or in general, as it tried to do in India and Bulgaria, it will offer to buy the technology and build it ourselves,” the expert says. More details: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/09/03/yadernye-reaktory-ssha-na-ukraine-snesti-i-postroit
        2. +5
          27 September 2021 18: 35
          Well, and Greta will help them.
        3. +3
          27 September 2021 20: 28
          Quote: Cowbra
          Westinghouse CANNOT build a nuclear power plant !!!

          They can’t build this here ... but the Czech Republic is just a share ... on another continent. ))
      2. +6
        27 September 2021 18: 40
        Quote: Babermetis
        Well Chekhov will be divorced for money.

        Nonsense is always costly, and political nonsense in general can lead to ruin. Ukraine is an example of this.
      3. 0
        27 September 2021 20: 12
        Not just divorced, but divorced like suckers!
      4. +1
        28 September 2021 16: 56
        Let's see in fact how much these will cost them. Certainly much more than that of Rosatom.
    2. +4
      27 September 2021 17: 37
      There is only one bidder, and only he sets the prices.

      Like this? It is written above that there is a tender (contract) worth $ 6 billion. The price is set by the customer.
      1. +12
        27 September 2021 17: 43
        Sorry but
        Tender (English tender - an application for a contract submitted on a competitive basis) is an English-language term denoting a competitive form of selection of proposals for the paid supply of goods, the provision of services or the performance of work according to conditions previously announced in the documentation, within the agreed time frame on the principles of competition
        where there is competition and adversariality, one is Westinghouse.
        1. +2
          27 September 2021 17: 50
          Quote: Crowe
          where there is competition and adversariality, one is Westinghouse.

          I decided to build a nuclear power plant and allocated 6 yards of American rubles for this. 3 companies decided they were interested. I chose one company out of three. Hmm ... where is the competition and who sets the prices?
          1. +2
            27 September 2021 18: 02
            Quote: professor
            I decided to build a nuclear power plant and allocated 6 yards of American rubles for this. 3 companies decided they were interested.

            That's right - "I want to milk my donkey, I want food!"
          2. +2
            27 September 2021 18: 07
            Good Oleg. Purely theoretically, the tender has determined the winner, the winner will receive well, at least 50% begins to rubber (create the appearance of work). After a certain time he declares that there is not enough money (prices have changed, etc.) The construction has stopped. Despite the fact that Westinghouse is actually bankrupt. Who will receive the refund? Will the US government be the guarantor of Westengauz?
            1. +2
              27 September 2021 18: 12
              Quote: zadorin1974
              Good Oleg. Purely theoretically, the tender has determined the winner, the winner will receive well, at least 50% begins to rubber (create the appearance of work). After a certain time he declares that there is not enough money (prices have changed, etc.) The construction has stopped. Despite the fact that Westinghouse is actually bankrupt. Who will receive the refund? Will the US government be the guarantor of Westengauz?

              Purely practically participated in the conclusion of contracts, though not in the atomic sphere. 50% in the first payment is overkill. Usually less. The contract for 6 yards is concluded between the governments (as a rule), what is called .G2G (government to government). Whether the Czechs will overpay in the end or not is known only to the Almighty.
              1. +2
                27 September 2021 18: 43
                Anything happens. We worked with the Finns and at 100% prepayment (though after a five-year cooperation). But with some of the "soloists" and under state guarantees, our friendly state-owned company no longer works. Everything happens.
                1. +4
                  27 September 2021 18: 51
                  An acquaintance of mine signed a contract with the Russians for $ 200. He made some kind of measuring system for them. They transferred money to him. To his question "how do you transfer 000% of an advance payment to me, never even seeing me?"
                  1. +2
                    27 September 2021 19: 00
                    Oleg cannot argue with such an argument)))))) But, I am sure that with a high-quality performance of the contract, he was not badly awarded. Some understatements stimulate))))
                  2. -2
                    28 September 2021 15: 47
                    Quote: professor
                    An acquaintance of mine signed a contract with the Russians for $ 200. He made some kind of measuring system for them. They transferred money to him. To his question "how do you transfer 000% of an advance payment to me, never even seeing me?"

                    This is not done with nuclear power plants, these are state funds. Forgiven just like the French were forgiven
      2. +6
        27 September 2021 17: 44
        Well, the estimate can grow. However, the Czechs have nothing to do with nuclear power plants, let them live on green energy.
      3. +1
        27 September 2021 17: 50
        Quote: professor
        Like this? It is written above that there is a tender (contract) worth $ 6 billion. The price is set by the customer

        There is only one contender! The estimate grows later ... And it grows and grows ...
        1. 0
          27 September 2021 17: 55
          Quote: Mountain Shooter
          There is only one contender! The estimate grows later ... And it grows and grows ...

          In the end, the contract is always concluded with one applicant. The rest are weeded out at different stages. The estimate can grow even if the contract is signed with Rosatom, or the contract can be closed in such a way that the overrun is at the expense of the contractor. And I've met this.
      4. 0
        27 September 2021 17: 55
        Quote: professor
        tender (contract) worth $ 6 billion

        not dollars, but euros
        this is an approximate estimated cost
        1. -1
          27 September 2021 17: 56
          Quote: Flood
          Quote: professor
          tender (contract) worth $ 6 billion

          not dollars, but euros
          this is an approximate estimated cost


          Thus, after the exclusion of the Russian Rosatom and the Chinese company China General Nuclear Power, for a contract worth 6 billion only one contender remained - Westinghouse, representing North America.
          1. +1
            27 September 2021 18: 06
            The choice of the company that is implementing the project for the construction of the power unit will take, according to the Deputy Prime Minister, 28-29 months. The cost of the project can be up to 160 billion kroons

            It is reported by finance.rambler.ru

            dividing by the exchange rate of 25,4 gives us 6,3 billion euros
            1. +1
              27 September 2021 18: 07
              Quote: Flood
              dividing by the exchange rate of 25,4 gives us 6,3 billion euros

              Am I against? The article above says dollars. If the euro, then Rosatom flew even more.
              1. +1
                27 September 2021 18: 09
                Quote: professor
                Am I against? The article above says dollars. If the euro, then Rosatom flew even more.

                on the VO, errors are permissible
                Rosatom did not have a chance after the "war" of diplomats
                despite the fact that in the Czech Republic there are two nuclear power plants built by Soviet specialists, and they are still supplied with fuel by the Russian TVEL
                1. 0
                  28 September 2021 08: 23
                  Quote: Flood
                  Quote: professor
                  Am I against? The article above says dollars. If the euro, then Rosatom flew even more.

                  on the VO, errors are permissible
                  Rosatom did not have a chance after the "war" of diplomats
                  despite the fact that in the Czech Republic there are two nuclear power plants built by Soviet specialists, and they are still supplied with fuel by the Russian TVEL

                  Another victory for Russian diplomacy.
      5. +6
        27 September 2021 18: 08
        Olkiluoto-3 with EPR reactor from Areva consortium. The construction cost increased from 3 billion euros to 9 billion euros.
      6. +4
        27 September 2021 20: 14
        Quote: professor
        It is written above that there is a tender (contract) worth $ 6 billion. The price is set by the customer.

        well in fairness to
        Vogtle Electric Generating Plant also had a contract + tender.
        The cost jumped by $ 2,3 billion.
        so is Olkiluodon ydinvoimalaitos ... although there are Areva, but the cost is up the hill + 5,5 billion and euros
        The start of operation of the third unit of the Olkiluoto NPP with the EPR-1600 reactor is now expected in June 2022 in connection with the extension of repair and inspection of turbine equipment, the Finnish company Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) reported. The extension of this work has already led to a delay in the start-up of a new unit under construction since 2005 by one month.

        recourse
      7. 0
        28 September 2021 14: 48
        Professor, you are not in the subject, from the word at all. A new nuclear power plant can cost Czechs a little for 18 lard, if you are lucky enough to complete it laughing
    3. +13
      27 September 2021 17: 39
      Oh .... Czechs ... Great exceptions. It should be noted that the elections in the Czech Republic are in October. And, according to the same Zeman, another cabinet of ministers will deal with the issue of the tender for Dukovany. And all decisions about the tender will be made by other people. Construction is scheduled for 29th year ... And the wave is such as if they are going to build now. I bet 100 green rag money that Rosatom will take this project, but a little later. Moreover, in terms of parameters, not a single candidate meets the conditions of the tender (except for Rosatom with its VVR 1200). The Czechs raised a wave to get some buns about the northern stream, etc. ... And they themselves ... slowly finished building its ground part. And silence. Lulei for the Nord Stream was scooped up by Germany ... And the Czechs ...
    4. +11
      27 September 2021 17: 40
      It's time to impose sanctions on Channel 1 and the like, for advertising the beer of a country declared hostile ...
      1. +3
        27 September 2021 18: 04
        Quote: Sergey Samkov
        It's time to impose sanctions on Channel 1 and the like, for advertising the country's beer

        It is necessary to impose sanctions, but we will drink beer.
        1. +2
          27 September 2021 19: 00
          So "beer" is brewed in Russia ....
          1. +1
            28 September 2021 08: 20
            Quote: wandlitz
            So "beer" is brewed in Russia ....

            It is true, we drink any beer, beer is out of politics, and if under the Astrakhan ram, then 10 mugs per evening.
      2. 0
        28 September 2021 07: 50
        It's time to impose sanctions on Channel 1 and the like, for advertising the beer of a country declared hostile ...


        I don't know what the problem is, exclude Czech swill and cars, let's see for a long time the Czechs would have enough puffing out their cheeks and wrinkling the back seat.
    5. +1
      27 September 2021 17: 42
      It seems that the Germans will be given electricity, otherwise they have nothing to cultivate "green energy", and you won't get far on it. Cunning! So all this "friendship" with the Germans and Czechs will not lead to anything good. It's time to understand this and stop submitting applications to all sorts of European "casinos" where it is impossible to win.
      1. +1
        27 September 2021 17: 46
        Quote: 1536
        It's time to understand this and stop submitting applications to all sorts of European "casinos" where it is impossible to win.

        And it's good that they were excluded! Because "if that" (and with Westinghouse the possibility of accidents is very high), at least the Russian Federation will not be able to blame.
        1. +3
          27 September 2021 17: 54
          Quote: Egoza
          at least the Russian Federation will not be able to blame.

          Well, this is just easy - Petrov / Boshirov (Sidorov / Sinepupin) are already laying a tourist route (but you can have a version and come up with a fresh time)
          1. -3
            27 September 2021 18: 00
            Quote: mark1
            Well, this is just easy - Petrov / Boshirov (Sidorov / Sinepupin) are already laying a tourist route (but you can come up with a better version)

            The Russian Federation responded so clearly to the Czech Republic what these tourists did on the territory of the Czech Republic. And the whole business was to find tourists, interrogate and share information with the Czechs.
            Well, it's strange to expect a contract worth billions when you officially include a client on the list of "enemies".
            1. +5
              27 September 2021 18: 26
              Therefore, they included that they did not expect anything, what is incomprehensible. Another wonder why Great Britain is not on this list. Again, what are the Czechs unhappy with, because they are on the same level with the United States, is it really not flattering?
              1. -2
                27 September 2021 18: 44
                Quote: Buhach
                Therefore, they included that they did not expect anything, what is incomprehensible. Another wonder why Great Britain is not on this list. Again, what are the Czechs unhappy with, because they are on the same level with the United States, is it really not flattering?

                They didn’t answer the inquiry about "tourists", but turned on the offended mode.
                1. +1
                  28 September 2021 00: 19
                  Was there a boy?
                  Nefig send moronic requests to which it is not possible to answer. Now they scattered to each anti-Russian vyser to look for some tourists there.
                  1. -1
                    28 September 2021 08: 27
                    Quote: alexmach
                    Was there a boy?

                    The boys were. The question is, what did they do there.

                    Quote: alexmach
                    Nefig send moronic requests to which it is not possible to answer. Now they scattered to each anti-Russian vyser to look for some tourists there.

                    Well, then there is no need to cry over the flight in the tender for 6 billion euros for the supply of high-tech equipment. Hydrocarbons are sold, you can sit on the pipe.
                    1. +2
                      28 September 2021 09: 41
                      Well then, you don't have to cry about the flight in the tender.

                      No need to play the fool "professor". With the Czech Republic, they will simply lead the way it deserves. In total it is business.
                      Hydrocarbons are sold, you can sit on the pipe.

                      Don't need your lies. Russia sells not only hydrocarbons. The same Rosatom has one of the world's largest nuclear energy orders. And one of the most advanced technologies. Yes, it’s sad that it doesn’t come out with the Czechs, well it’s out somehow differently.

                      The request for "tourists" was never answered

                      Was there a boy?

                      The boys were. The question is, what were they doing there

                      Yes, yes, just don't lie. There was no request. On the part of the Czech Republic, there were only vyseurs in the media. To this they were answered quite unequivocally and with dignity.
                      1. -1
                        28 September 2021 12: 55
                        Quote: alexmach
                        Well then, you don't have to cry about the flight in the tender.

                        No need to play the fool "professor". With the Czech Republic, they will simply lead the way it deserves. In total it is business.
                        Hydrocarbons are sold, you can sit on the pipe.

                        Don't need your lies. Russia sells not only hydrocarbons. The same Rosatom has one of the world's largest nuclear energy orders. And one of the most advanced technologies. Yes, it’s sad that it doesn’t come out with the Czechs, well it’s out somehow differently.

                        The request for "tourists" was never answered

                        Was there a boy?

                        The boys were. The question is, what were they doing there

                        Yes, yes, just don't lie. There was no request. On the part of the Czech Republic, there were only vyseurs in the media. To this they were answered quite unequivocally and with dignity.

                        1. And I’m talking about that. With the Czech Republic, they will behave in such a way that 6 billion will not go to the treasury of the Russian Federation, but Russian officials will continue to buy real estate in the Czech Republic.
                        2. The main export item of the Russian Federation is minerals. Moreover, the ruble / dollar exchange rate is strictly tied to the world oil price.
                        3. Uh-huh. there was no request about "tourists" and the vile Czechs simply expelled Russian diplomats and "diplomats".
                    2. +2
                      28 September 2021 11: 29
                      Cool, so experience, technology and responsibility for the supplied high-tech equipment is nothing because of some "tourists" who have nothing to do with the construction of the nuclear power plant. The main thing is that they did not answer, they offended with silence, arrogance towards the Czechs (well deserved delusional speculation), therefore, even worse and thinner and more expensive, but their own, they do not offend, and if they offend, so also their own, they can (well, like Merkel with a wiretap). He smiled about the pipe, but they say the Jews are smart (no, well, I see -Not all) wink
        2. +3
          27 September 2021 17: 54
          Wait a little and Rosatom will push the BREST reactors. There will definitely not be competitors there. Khan then and Westinghouse and China with its waste. And the cost price of kWh.
          1. +1
            27 September 2021 18: 08
            Quote: Azimut
            Wait a bit and Rosatom will push the BREST reactors

            Yes, there will be a queue of people who wish - Iran, North. Korea, Saudi Arabia ... - to produce plutonium ...
        3. +1
          28 September 2021 10: 50
          Dear Egoza, I really respect your comments, when you are on the site, it is always smart and sharp. But now I can't help but answer, because "if that" - it will be "if that" in the very center of Europe! In my opinion, sacrificing the lives of millions of people for the sake of momentary political gain and someone's ambitions is at least irresponsible. 1986 will be remembered by mankind for the next 1000 years, and the nuclear power unit is not a processor unit of a personal computer and it is simply dangerous to instruct a bankrupt company to build.
          Meanwhile, Rosatom has ensured that its nuclear power plants are the safest in the world today, they are being built using advanced technologies with multi-level protection from many factors, including "protection from brainless crooks."
          I agree, there is a danger. Even the notorious personal computer can carry it, but then the conclusion suggests itself: not to build a station in the Czech Republic at all.
          1. +1
            28 September 2021 15: 03
            Quote: 1536
            then the conclusion suggests itself: do not build a station in the Czech Republic at all.

            I agree, Eugene! Only politicians don't think so. One hope is that while the pandemic is "walking", they will not unfold with construction now. And there - as God willing. The power in the Czech Republic will change, the USA will crumble, they themselves will refuse to build because of the high cost, Westinghouse will go bankrupt ... but no one can forbid them to "dream" of an American station today.
            Py.Sy And thank you for your kind words
    6. -1
      27 September 2021 18: 00
      It is possible for the Czechs to break off something worth 6 billion. List.
      1. 0
        28 September 2021 10: 00
        A good War is better than a bad world.
    7. +2
      27 September 2021 18: 12
      There is only one bidder, and only he sets the prices.
      ... And figs on them ...
    8. +2
      27 September 2021 18: 14
      Czechs pay and repent when the Western owners break the deadline and the budget will triple.
      1. 0
        28 September 2021 09: 59
        They will survive, nothing will happen to them
    9. -2
      27 September 2021 18: 15
      No nuclear power plants in NATO countries. Why do we need these troubles? They spit in our face, and we give them gas, oil, timber. All this itself is lacking. Rosneft is pushing gas to the West, while Siberia is choking on coal smoke. What is the Czech Republic is about a large Siberian collective farm. Forget about the Czech Republic and paint over the map with white paint. To make one embassy for the whole EU, in Brussels, it seems and not to suffer with small fry.
      Who would have built a nuclear power plant for me (us) on credit for their own money, so that later all coal CHPPs would be closed.
      1. +2
        27 September 2021 18: 31
        It is true that in the USSR there were embassies only in Moscow and not in all the republics, why shouldn't we do that too?
        1. +1
          28 September 2021 13: 46
          Then the embassy should not be in Brussels, but in Berlin. There is no need to support a "common European" props.
      2. +1
        28 September 2021 06: 43
        agree! Let's develop ourselves!
      3. +1
        28 September 2021 11: 38
        Who would have built a nuclear power plant for me (us) on credit for their own money, so that later all coal CHPPs would be closed.

        It won't work that way. Nuclear power plants need thermal power plants to balance consumption. With a low population density, a nuclear power plant is absolutely not economically profitable, powerful consumers are needed. Well, coal-fired thermal power plant, also from the same opera. It is also unprofitable to pull gas pipelines to distant corners, especially if there is coal nearby. And then, the CHP plant supplies both electricity and heat, and the nuclear power plant only energy. And for heating, you still need to build either a CHP or boiler houses.
        1. 0
          28 September 2021 12: 28
          I disagree. Why is 1700 km to Germany or how much is profitable there, and 600 km to Krasnoyarsk is not profitable? And the pipe is not 1400 mm, but let's say 400 mm, that's enough for us. Before retirement, he worked at an electric boiler house. almost environmentally friendly, instant hot water supply and temperature control. And a million-strong city with factories, factories with a future metro, isn't it a powerful consumer? By the way, coal is burned in Krasnoyarsk of the lowest quality.
          1. 0
            28 September 2021 14: 56
            and 600 km to Krasnoyarsk is not profitable

            It is profitable to go to Germany in 1700 because what volumes are pumped there from year to year, and so on for dozens of years. In the Krasnoyarsk region, apparently there are no gas pipelines, no gas production. The pipe must be dragged across the taiga from the Kovykta-Chayanda fields. So far, there will not be enough gas for the Chinese contract, and how much more gas will go to the Amur Gas Chemical Plant. I don’t think that because of harm, large cities are not connected to gas.
            1. -2
              28 September 2021 16: 17
              It's just that our rulers and oligarchs don't like the Russian people. In Germany, for example, there is gas in any small village. 600 km is the distance from the Power of Siberia. Another problem is that coal mines and thermal power plants belong to one person who lives in Monaco and our problems are not too much for him. Some of the shares are held by the regional leadership. In principle, we have nuclear reactors, but they need to be converted from producing weapons-grade plutonium to generating electricity, if possible.
              An interesting position - to drag a pipe through the taiga to the descendants of the Nazis can be expensive for their people. By the way, Germany has set a course for green energy in which there is basically no coal and gas.
              Gazprom needs to be nationalized and the gas directed to the needs of the people, ours and not the German, Polish and Western Europe in general. The gasification program that is, it is somehow sluggish like a mercy bar from Gazprom.
              1. 0
                28 September 2021 17: 45
                An interesting position - to drag a pipe through the taiga to the descendants of the Nazis can be expensive for their people.

                What does all this have to do with it? Do we now not trade with the Tatars, Mongols, French and other Turks? And yes, it is expensive to drag a pipe from a main gas pipeline, in which there is still no gas in sufficient quantities. The cost will be such that it is easiest to send all consumers to Monaco, but not to pull gas.
                1. 0
                  29 September 2021 12: 36
                  You worry about your own people, more worried about yourself and not about the French and other foreigners. When we live from the belly, then we can throw something to them from our table.
                  Understand we are a cash cow for them, when we cannot give milk we will be allowed to eat.
                  How much does the owner of the Siberian energy sector take, you can send all his workers on vacation for at least a year to the glorious city of Monaco and ride on the world's largest sailing ship belonging to this gentleman. And the people of Monaco have already howled from his lawlessness.
                  What do you personally get from trade with, for example, France or Germany? What do they allow us to buy with the money we earn from gas?
                  1. +1
                    29 September 2021 18: 40
                    What do you personally get from trade with, for example, France or Germany?

                    I mentioned all these Frenchmen in the context of
                    to drag the pipe through the taiga to the descendants of the Nazis
                    that we shouldn't trade with everyone, who we once fought with?
                    Well, what does trading give me personally? The same as for you - the filling of the budget from the sale of resources, although I am a supporter of the sale not of raw materials, but of the products of its processing.
                    1. -1
                      30 September 2021 11: 58
                      The filling of the budget from the sale of resources still needs to be checked and verified, for example, how much money remains after the sale of resources in foreign banks? Who prevents us from selling pure gasoline instead of oil? The margin will immediately jump ten times.
                      I personally think you need to trade with neutral or friendly states, and not as you did with the Third Reich before the war. Only imposed sanctions and restrictions on the purchase of certain goods, usually technology and high-tech goods - all bye.
                      And you, dear comrade or gentleman, need to think with your own head, and not believe what the TV says. Everything is expensive for his people, it is not profitable and there is no one to do, and to drag and lay far, and you are rushing on an average pension of 15 thousand. Only now they are deciding what Russian citizens working abroad would pay taxes at home. How does it feel? On this good note, we probably need to say goodbye. Good luck.
    10. -11
      27 September 2021 18: 23
      It's a pity, otherwise you took the nuclear waste to Russia for "burial".
      1. +6
        27 September 2021 18: 46
        Quote: Aurel
        It's a pity, otherwise you took the nuclear waste to Russia for "burial"

        We have the world's best spent nuclear fuel reprocessing technologies. What they have is waste, we have raw materials. Refining at Rosatom is a profitable business.
        1. -12
          27 September 2021 19: 11
          Nuclear waste cannot be 100% recycled, in other words, you cannot make candy out of shit, part of the unrecycled waste is inevitably buried in Siberia, and the profits go to Moscow.
          1. +1
            27 September 2021 19: 13
            Quote: Aurel
            Nuclear waste cannot be 100% recycled, in other words, you cannot make candy out of shit, part of the unrecycled waste is inevitably buried in Siberia, profits go to Moscow

            I see, a connoisseur ... Are they scattered over the whole of Siberia, or are they buried in some other way?
          2. -1
            28 September 2021 09: 57
            Where is the droushka?
          3. -1
            28 September 2021 11: 33
            Of course, you know better, your job is to see that Moscow does not swell with profits.
    11. +3
      27 September 2021 18: 32
      Most importantly, Rosatom takes all the radioactive waste and recycles it in Russia. Where the Czechs will bury the waste. Czech Republic is big.
      1. +4
        28 September 2021 00: 21
        You can also refuse to supply fuel assemblies to existing nuclear power plants .. well, of course, from waste processing too.
        1. 0
          28 September 2021 09: 56
          Well, the country refused to adhere, the technology was tested on it, until it exploded, because these are "democratic, clean" assemblies.
        2. 0
          28 September 2021 13: 50
          ... And to motivate this by the fact that the Russian Federation is not included in the Czech list of the 1996 law on state orders ...
    12. +1
      27 September 2021 18: 37
      in vain they refused. high quality and free only Russia can build
    13. 0
      27 September 2021 19: 18
      Is this a subtle hint that the Chinese also blew up Czech warehouses? Ba-Shi and Pet-Rof?
    14. 0
      27 September 2021 19: 37
      Does the law have a retroactive effect in the "civilized" world?
    15. 0
      27 September 2021 19: 40
      In short, by decree, the president banned nuclear power plants in the country.
      Nobody will build it.
    16. +2
      27 September 2021 19: 59
      Honest, open democracy with a free market
    17. -3
      27 September 2021 20: 59
      "Who feeds the girl, he dances her."
      Our Foreign Ministry had to huddle earlier
      Czech Republic, and not groan at briefings about a world conspiracy.
      Another loss of Russian foreign policy.
      It remains to puff up eyes in blue for the camera
      and raise concerns.
      And to scream - but it doesn't hurt us, it doesn't hurt.
      And China is not interested in the Czech Republic. 147%.
    18. 0
      28 September 2021 08: 35
      Nothing personal, just business.
    19. +2
      28 September 2021 09: 53
      Freedom, whatever they want, they do ...
      And this is their right, but let them not stutter about free trade.
      And what does ES say about this?
    20. 0
      28 September 2021 11: 30
      only one contender remained - Westinghouse, representing North America.

      You can bet on whether a nuclear power plant will be built in the Czech Republic at all?
    21. sen
      +1
      28 September 2021 14: 59
      Thus, after the exclusion of the Russian Rosatom and the Chinese company China General Nuclear Power, only one contender remained for the $ 6 billion contract - Westinghouse, representing North America.

      Distillation vassals are trying to please the United States, forgetting about their own interests.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"