Russian army against light drones

21

Pantsir-S1 is an effective anti-UAV weapon with ambiguous economic indicators. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

A modern developed army must be able to defend itself against enemy unmanned aerial vehicles of all classes. For this purpose, new systems of weapons and other equipment are being developed with different operating principles. The tactics of using such novelties and well-known samples are also being formed. The most successful and effective developments and ideas are mastered by the Russian army and are regularly tested at various exercises.

Light threat


The conflicts of recent years, as well as various research and training activities, show that light and compact UAVs of aircraft and helicopter types pose the greatest danger to the army. Such products can carry out patrolling and reconnaissance, incl. for organizing strikes with full-fledged firepower.



A light drone can itself be a carrier of weapons, even if they are light and low-power. At the same time, the lack of power of a separate ammunition can be compensated for by the massive use of shock UAVs. The organization of such a raid will be facilitated by the simplicity and low cost of unmanned vehicles, commercial or even artisanal.


Electronic warfare R-330Zh "Zhitel" complex in the stowed position. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

The fight against such an air threat with traditional air defense systems is difficult. Small-sized UAVs with a minimum of metal parts are difficult to detect with a radar designed for full-size aircraft. Defeat drone is also associated with problems: an anti-aircraft missile is redundant for such a purpose, and the use of receiver systems reduces the possible interception range.

In this regard, the search for alternative air defense methods based on other methods and complexes continues for a long time. The direction of specialized means of electronic intelligence and electronic warfare is developing, specialized anti-aircraft systems are being developed, etc. The possibility of using available systems and tools in a new role is also being considered.

Based on the results of tests and other activities, changes are made to the organizational and staff structure, new tactics and samples are adopted. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense does not give preference to any particular direction and applies an integrated approach. Its positive aspects can be observed right now.

In the process of study


An integrated approach to defense against complex unmanned systems has been repeatedly demonstrated in recent exercises. For example, great attention was paid to these issues during the joint maneuvers "West-2021". Even more interesting and revealing news arrived a few days ago from the coastal troops of the Caspian flotilla.

Russian army against light drones
"Resident" in the process of deployment. Photo by Rosoboronexport

On September 21, the press service of the Ministry of Defense announced the planned tactical exercise of the Marine Corps KFL with the involvement of 500 troops and 200 units. technology, one of the goals of which will be to practice the fight against UAVs. For the first time, mobile anti-drones units have been included in the battalion tactical group of the KFL. RTR and EW specialists were supposed to provide search, target designation and suppression of detected targets.

In addition, according to the plan of the exercises, duty groups of snipers are involved in the fight against UAVs, who will have to hit air targets in the range. Part of the training targets will hit the crews of portable anti-aircraft systems from the air defense groups.

It should be noted that such exercises are not isolated. Over the past few years, news has been regularly received about various events involving tactical groups to combat UAVs. Other units are also involved in such exercises, primarily air defense batteries.

Specialized units


In response to the current threat, several years ago, mobile electronic warfare groups began to be formed in the formations of the armed forces, primarily in the ground forces. Such a unit receives modern self-propelled electronic means and must accompany the troops on the march and in positions.


Complex "Borisoglebsk-2" during preparation for work. Photo Russianarms.ru

The news about West-2021 and the KFL exercises mentions the use of electronic warfare systems of modern types - Borisoglebsk-1/2, Zhitel and R-934BMV. During the maneuvers, the mobile groups moved to the assigned positions and ensured the fight against the UAV of the simulated enemy. Independently and by external target designation, they detected airborne objects, then identified control channels and suppressed them with the help of interference.

According to known data, the R-330Zh "Zhitel" complex is designed to suppress signals from navigation satellites, and "Borisoglebsk" of both versions can operate in a wide frequency range and solve an extended range of tasks. The combined use of these two complexes, as practice has repeatedly confirmed, makes it possible to disrupt the communication of the UAV with the operator's console and disrupt the transmission of commands, telemetry and video signals. Autonomous operation of the drone due to loss of navigation is also excluded.

It is also not the first year that exercises have been conducted with the involvement of snipers. As practice has shown, the correct organization of combat work allows you to use it as an anti-aircraft weapons even sniper rifles. A trained soldier with an SVD or ASVK rifle is capable of hitting a small-sized mobile and maneuvering air target at distances up to 1-1,5 km and altitudes up to 300-400 m.

Traditional approach


It should be noted that in the fight against UAVs of all classes, "traditional" means of electronic warfare and air defense are also quite actively used. Moreover, unlike mobile and sniper groups, such a defense not only went through exercises, but also has real combat experience.


R-934BMV jamming station. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

2015-16 terrorist organizations have repeatedly tried to attack the Khmeimim airbase using various UAVs. Russian electronic warfare systems and anti-aircraft systems successfully repelled raids. Jamming stations suppressed control channels and disrupted autonomous flight, and the few devices that managed to maintain the direction of flight were hit by missiles and cannons of the Pantsir-C1 and Tor systems.

The existing defense system has repeatedly confirmed its potential and high efficiency when working on small-sized commercial and homemade UAVs. It should be taken into account that the cost of the spent ammunition several times exceeded the price of the downed vehicles, but due to this, even greater damage was prevented.

Development continues


Lightweight and compact UAVs are difficult targets for detection and destruction, but they cannot be considered invulnerable. There are many methods and means of timely detection and destruction of such targets, and most often it is not about their overall effectiveness, but about the appropriateness of their application in specific conditions.


Snipers are firing at the UAV. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Our army already has a number of models of equipment and systems designed specifically to combat UAVs. Also, specialized units with special equipment are being created. At the same time, already existing forces and means are involved in the fight against drones. These tasks are entrusted to radar and anti-aircraft complexes, and more recently to snipers.

Thus, the development of means of countering and destroying UAVs does not stop, and new samples are regularly demonstrated. A significant part of them, after the necessary checks and other procedures, enter service and are sent to the troops. Sometimes such processes are delayed, but in general the situation is conducive to optimism. The threat of light UAVs remains and even grows, and the Russian army is always ready to respond to it.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    27 September 2021 18: 51
    I would look at the sniper who can hit a flying quadrocopter 1,5 km from the ASVK.
    Delirium is doggy. I'm sorry for my French.
    1. +5
      27 September 2021 19: 43
      A trained soldier with an SVD or ASVK rifle is capable of hitting a small-sized mobile and maneuvering air target at distances up to 1-1,5 km and altitudes up to 300-400 m.

      Sounds like the recommendations of 1941 "... on the sighting slots of the tank ... on low-flying aircraft, salvo fire ..."
      1. -2
        27 September 2021 20: 13
        Quote: Civil
        Sounds like the recommendations of 1941 "... on the sighting slots of the tank ... on low-flying aircraft, salvo fire ..."




        How much these "tactics" cost human lives is still unknown. And the current generals are adherents of such "tactics", the principle of "new ones are born" has not changed.
      2. +2
        28 September 2021 10: 13
        Reminded an old joke
    2. +1
      28 September 2021 06: 08
      Where did you see the army quadcopter?
  2. +3
    27 September 2021 22: 40
    Why was Derivation not mentioned?
  3. +4
    28 September 2021 06: 36
    It is possible, and even necessary, to teach a sniper to shoot at a drone, but seriously consider this as the main method of struggle .... ???
    And so, IMHO, everything that shoots must have the option of attaching powerful optics to a ballistic computer, so that any armored personnel carrier / infantry fighting vehicle could become a "derivation" at any time.
    1. 0
      30 September 2021 13: 07
      There is also a ready-made anti-aircraft gun in the form of ZU-23 / 30M (modernized ZU-23-2) with remote control, suitable as a combat module for medium and light armored vehicles.
      You can also equip self-propelled howitzer artillery with guided detonation shells.
  4. +1
    28 September 2021 09: 15
    Also, for several years, exercises have been conducted with the involvement of snipers. As practice has shown, the correct organization of combat work allows even sniper rifles to be used as anti-aircraft weapons.

    Basically, it is supposed to use helicopters for sniper shooting at UAVs, which allow you to get close to the desired distance.
    https://rg.ru/2021/06/27/reg-ufo/vertolety-so-snajperami-budut-ohotitsia-za-udarnymi-dronami-na-iuge-rossii.html
    In this article:
    https://bukren.my1.ru/publ/ware/il_2_w/2-1-0-58
    it is proposed to use relatively slow fighters to combat UAVs and cruise missiles. To combat them, the fighter is supposed to be armed with cheap missiles. Like "nails" for "Pantsir-C1".
  5. +1
    28 September 2021 09: 56
    Quote: Jacket in stock
    It is possible and even necessary to teach a sniper to shoot a drone. "

    Try to shoot with rifled weapons at the plates on the stand. fool
    Shooting a bolt / self-loading sniper rifle at drones from the same series. To increase the chance of hitting, you need to either use homing ammunition or increase the density of fire.
    1. 0
      28 September 2021 15: 45
      Why not. I've seen specialists. But seriously, the angular movement of the saucer is much faster compared to the UAV and its area is smaller. Shooting optics at light UAVs can be effective. UAV low-maneuverable target. But the author is clearly bent about the range of 1,5 km. and an altitude of 400 meters. This is too much.
      1. +1
        30 September 2021 13: 12
        From the AK-74, I would have hit, but no further than 300-400 m, in a long line with tracers through one or two rounds. I believe that for most shooters this is the limit.
  6. +1
    28 September 2021 10: 23
    UAVs turned out to be quite a serious enemy, despite the fact that at first they were not taken very seriously.
    For radars, they are small and little metal, for MANPADS, the engines glow little in the infrared range, and this is the most common seeker for MANPADS.
    With electronic warfare, too, not everything is simple - an electronic warfare station in the suppression mode actively emits, is easily detected, which means it is a matter of time when the UAV will have massive ammunition and detection means against operating electronic warfare and radar.
    Radiant guns, which can sometimes be seen - on aircraft, protection is from a direct lightning strike, nothing prevents you from applying these principles to UAVs.
    Gradually, of course, they will come up with protection against small UAVs, but so far this is clearly difficult, and UAVs are growing by leaps and bounds
  7. -2
    28 September 2021 10: 38
    ! yrepyans san u eishoroH
  8. +2
    28 September 2021 15: 34
    And this nonsense about the defeat at a distance of 1-1,5 km, and even at an altitude of 300-400m. Snipers are officially voiced by the Department of Defense! And why then did they not announce the possibility of other trained servicemen who do not have sniper rifles to shoot down UAVs with hats, because historically, our cap is very often a weapon of victory?
  9. +1
    28 September 2021 16: 13
    Quote: 89268170588
    Why not. I've seen specialists.


    Where? On TV? laughing

    Quote: 89268170588

    But seriously, the angular movement of the saucer is much faster compared to the UAV and its area is smaller.


    Only you, my dear fellow, forget that:

    1. The plate moves along the PREDICTED ballistic trajectory and is deprived of the ability to maneuver.

    2. The plates are shot down at ranges of 30-70 meters. And UAVs, with absolutely consumer-grade optics, absolutely do not need to approach the object of observation at such a distance.

    3. Don't overestimate the ARMY snipers. We're talking about the army? Look at the performance characteristics of army rifle complexes in terms of accuracy, and correlate them with the size of the UAV. Questions will disappear by themselves. bully

    Quote: 89268170588

    This is too much.

    Too much more correct.
  10. -2
    29 September 2021 12: 56
    Rockets are like sparrows from cannons. Catch them with nets, fly swatter, or maybe like mosquitoes ... Maybe you should try to spray clouds of combustible substance in the air and arrange broads .. In the glow they will !.
  11. +1
    30 September 2021 09: 55
    It is logical that for cheap small-sized drones it is necessary to design a cheap but rather effective means of destruction (missile, ammunition, kamikaze drone). And there are so many myths about high maneuverability too .. Does anyone know the main characteristics of maneuverability?
  12. +1
    29 October 2021 05: 18
    To combat small-sized air targets, it is necessary to return to the troops medium-caliber anti-aircraft guns of 57-85 mm with remote detonation fragmentation shells, since it is a swarm of fragments at a given height that will be the most effective means of hitting small air targets. Small-caliber anti-aircraft guns of 20-30 mm do not have shells with fragmentation detonation at a given height, and for 57 automatic anti-aircraft guns S-60 TTX allows you to hit the Turkish Bayraktar both in height and in range
  13. 0
    29 October 2021 20: 59
    Probably the best thing that can be opposed to an uav is another uav. Well, there may still be anti-aircraft artillery.
  14. 0
    9 November 2021 10: 41
    It seems like we were talking about a module with a 57mm cannon. Almost ready. Why doesn't this sound here?