USC announced the timing of the launch of the sea trials of the second serial APRKSN "Generalissimo Suvorov"

Sea trials of the second serial nuclear-powered strategic submarine Generalissimus Suvorov of Project 955A Borey-A will begin in 2022. Currently, the submarine cruiser is being prepared for launching.

As Vladimir Korolev, deputy general director of USC for military shipbuilding, explained, equipment is being installed on the cruiser, before the end of which a large amount of work is required. The APRKSN is being prepared for launching, but the exact date at Sevmash cannot yet be named, it will be determined later. It is emphasized that all work is proceeding according to schedule, without disruptions.

The hull of the ship has been formed, in which all the necessary large-sized equipment is loaded (...) The pace of work is quite high. Everything is going according to schedule for Severodvinsk residents

- leads TASS the words of the Queen.

Today, four Boreas are in service with the Russian Navy, of which three projects 955 (Borey) of the 4th generation - the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh, as well as one submarine missile carrier modernized project "Borey-A" - "Prince Vladimir".

The fifth strategic cruiser, aka the first serial of the modernized project "Borey-A" - "Prince Oleg", will become part of fleet before the end of this year. Now he is completing state tests.

Five more submarines of the Borei-A project - Generalissimo Suvorov (laid down on December 26, 2014), "Emperor Alexander III" (laid down on December 18, 2015), "Prince Pozharsky" (laid down on December 23, 2016), "Prince Potemkin "and" Dmitry Donskoy "(laid down on the same day on August 23, 2021) are at various stages of completion.

Comments

[lucul]

Sea trials of the second serial nuclear-powered strategic submarine Generalissimus Suvorov of Project 955A Borey-A will begin in 2022.

Pretty boy .

[Orange bigg]

The news is good, of course, but expected. I was more pleased with another piece of news from USC.

.MOSCOW, September 23. / TASS /. The head modernized frigate of Project 22350M will be laid down in 2024. This was announced by Vladimir Korolev, deputy general director of USC for military shipbuilding, in an interview with TASS.

"Starting in 2024, we will begin construction of the head modernized frigate," said Korolev, answering the question about the timing of the laying of the project 22350M frigate.

He clarified that work is now underway on the technical design of the ship, which is scheduled to be completed in 2023.

“We are aware that the Navy needs a modern frigate with a large displacement and armament. Currently, this issue is being actively worked out in the Ministry of Defense,” added the deputy general director of the USC.

https://tass.ru/ekonomika/12482821

[bayard]

Quote: OrangeBigg

I was more pleased with the other news from USC.

Quote: OrangeBigg

... The head modernized frigate of Project 22350M will be laid down in 2024.

And what good is this news?
What will be laid down?
So many years have already been promised about this. So the boathouse has been completed / is being completed.
Or what in 2024?
So his / them should have been laid no later than the end of this - the first half of 2022.
And immediately in a series - at least 2 pieces at once. For there should not be anything particularly new there, except for the power plant, in which sustainer diesel engines of economic speed should replace the GTU M70FRU. As well as extended / increased ammunition: 48 launchers in the UKSK instead of 16 \ 24 pieces. at 22350 \ 22350.1, and three times more missiles. Yes, two helicopters instead of one. Everything else was supposed to be like 22350.
... So why rejoice?
That instead of (maximum) in the first half of 2022, it (already it, that is, in one copy) will be laid in 2024 ??
This is not a joy, here we have, to put it mildly, another "shift to the right" for two years.
With the bookmark, not SERIES at once, because all systems have been worked out on 22350, but only the "head" one ...
Which, in turn, means that the 22350M series will not be available until the final delivery of this lead ship to the customer ...
And this already means that until the end of the decade, the fleet will not see such ships ... unless, except for the "lead" ...
What is there to go nuts, if at 22350 both "Polyment-Redut", and UKSK, and BIUS, and gun mounts are worked out, like everything else ... It was just necessary to increase VI up to 7000 tons in standard and up to 8000 tons in full VI, increase the ammunition load of the CD and missile defense systems, expand the hangar for 2 helicopters.
And that's it!
There was NO innovation in all of these additions, just a stupid increase in quantity.
And even a simplification (!!!) of the gearbox of a new power plant, because it is much more difficult to marry a diesel engine and a gas turbine on one gearbox than two turbines!
So why are these dances again ??
This nonsense with the "head" ??
Especially in 2024 ??
Combat ships VI, like the 22350M, can freely (!) Be built on the existing (!) Stocks of the Admiralty shipyards and Yantar (1155 were built there.
And the "new slipway" was built not for the 22350M, but for the construction of the Leader nuclear destroyers, which, praise Ahura-Mazda, were safely abandoned. So there was nothing to wait for a new slipway. It's just that instead of fooling around with 20386 ... this, God forgive me, handicrafts on the stocks, and fiddling with the "innovative power plant" for him, it was JUST to lay the 22350M series in Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg at the available capacities.
AND EVERYTHING!
And they would have been with ships.

And now we will definitely not.
Because these "masters", "responsible" for the business, do not want to bother themselves with diligence.
Another thing is to master the budget and sabotage the defense order.
This is FUN.

If these clever men in 2024 still lay the "head" 22350M, then it will be tested no earlier than by 2030.
They will test it ... they will think about 2 - 3 years ...
And then ... perhaps the series will be laid ...
Do you believe that?
Me not .
I, at the moment, do not see their desire to build even the frigates of the current series - 22350 \ 22350.1.
But I can clearly see SABOTAGE.
And sabotage.
At all stages and directions.
And also the deceit and deception of the first person of the state ... Although the person itself ... to deceive.I'm glad.

Spoon road - for dinner.
And the Fleet is at the War.

How are these "gentlemen" going to fight if it breaks out in the coming years?
"Varshavyanka"?

Corvettes 20380 with a conditionally combat-ready air defense system?
And torpedoes with a range of up to 20 km. ? ... When torpedoes hit the enemy's MAPL for 50+ km. ?
Two frigates 22350 and a handful of old ships?
The only Yasenem-M and a handful of old Soviet-built MAPLs?
What?
Maybe Maritime Missile Aviation, which does not exist?
Just as there is almost no Naval Aviation ...
What?
The time has come to answer, because the end of 2021 is in the yard ... but they had to hand over everything by the end of 2020.

So what joyful news about the transfer of the "head" 22350M bookmark for two years to the right?

[Orange bigg]

... For there should not be anything particularly new there, except for the power plant, in which sustainer diesel engines of economic speed should replace the GTU M70FRU. As well as extended / increased ammunition: 48 launchers in the UKSK instead of 16 \ 24 pieces. at 22350 \ 22350.1, and three times more missiles. Yes, two helicopters instead of one. Everything else was supposed to be like 22350.

I'll see, you know best of all what should be in the 22350M project and what should not be, although the technical project itself will be ready only in 2023. Maybe a new engine is planned there, about the creation of which there was information in the media.

And the "new slipway" was built not for the 22350M, but for the construction of the Leader nuclear destroyers, which, praise Ahura-Mazda, were safely abandoned. So there was nothing to wait for a new slipway. It's just that instead of fooling around with 20386 ... this, God forgive me, handicrafts on the stocks, and fiddling with the "innovative power plant" for him, it was JUST to lay the 22350M series in Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg at the available capacities.
AND EVERYTHING!
And they would have been with ships.

Everything is too simple for you. Some kind of amateurish approach. If only where and if only what, but build and faster. Further it is simply difficult to perceive everything that you have written. Directly hysterical.

[bayard]

Quote: OrangeBigg

I'll see you know better than anyone what should be in the 22350M project

Its appearance has been discussed and agreed upon for a long time, so enough is known about it. Unless they start shoving something new into it again - innovative.

Quote: OrangeBigg

Maybe a new engine is planned there, about the creation of which there was information in the media.

The power plant for it is planned on two shafts, two turbines each: M70FRU - sustainer, and M90FR - afterburner.
So the power plant is really new, but on completely serial and produced by the domestic industry gas turbines, and the gearbox for them will be even easier to make than for the diesel-gas turbine in 22350.
And this power plant would have been ready, if it were not for the loading of "Zvezda" with the development of an "innovative" power plant for the unmatched "modular" corvette 20386. It was for this nonsense that the golden time was spent and the slipways were reserved.
Lack of intelligence?
Or from malicious intent?
It was this fuss with the "invalid before birth" did not allow to prepare the power plant in time for the ship that was really critical for the Navy - practically the destroyer 22350M.

Quote: OrangeBigg

Everything is too simple for you.

Well, if you build instead of really ships that have a combat value, "modular" freaks 22160 and disabled 20386, as well as insist on continuing their series (for 22160) ... At the same time, compose fairy tales about how strong and perfect they are, that "everything NATO will scatter from the oceans and hide in its bases "... then yes - everything is much simpler for me.
It is necessary to build ships NECESSARY FOR THE FLEET. Their characteristics and capabilities must correspond to the tasks facing the State and its Fleet.
When designing a new ship, the coefficient of novelty should not exceed 15%, so as not to disrupt the pace of construction, not to stretch the time and avoid cost overruns.
Almost all systems were tested on frigates 22350, where the thin places and the most difficult part was the air defense system - radar and air defense systems. "Polyment-Redoubt" brought to condition and fully operational. The combat use of various CDs from the UKSK has been sufficiently worked out.
As well as BIUS.
General ship systems, electronic warfare, communications, PLO - everything has been worked out.
And now, based on this ship, we need to get 1,5 times larger with exactly the same weapons systems.
It's not hard .
Just a larger ship with a large ammunition load of KR, missiles, torpedoes (Packet-NK) and a second helicopter. Of course - better seaworthiness and autonomy, which is due to greater VI.
The novelty coefficient of the 22350M will never exceed 15%.
This means that the industry will be able to easily switch from building 22350 to building 22350M, because the experience gained will help them. With already debugged (more or less) cooperation.

Quote: OrangeBigg

If only where and if only what, but build and faster

If only that we are just building, and with great zeal.
And what the Fleet really needs is critically needed, on the contrary, they are sabotaging.
Listing all the examples will take too much time and volume, here the topic is not for one article. Yes, we have all these topics beaten like old punching bags.

Quote: OrangeBigg

Further it is simply difficult to perceive everything that you have written. Directly hysterical.

Come on, it's just "Noble Rage", because it is simply impossible to take all this seriously.
Nobody is building anything and is not going to build anything. Everyone is just pretending ... and portraying the "stormy activity" with less and less skillful and believable.
They don't even bother themselves with that.
Take a look at how work is progressing on the modernization of our only aircraft carrier.
They are being sabotaged by the stable delays in the construction of the new dock.
The modernization of the cruiser "Admiral Nakhimov" has been delayed indefinitely.
Uniform circus with a power plant loading afloat at the "Admiral Golovko".
... The only thing I was pleased with was the unexpectedly operational modernization of Marshal Shaposhnikov. But this is rather a pleasant exception.
The shipbuilding program has been completely disrupted.
Draft design 22350M was ready by January last year, but there was no order for its technical design.
Why
If the new boathouse was then actively being completed, and such ships could be built on the existing stocks in the same Yantar - they had built 1155 ave. There before.
Where does this slowness come from?
And this against the backdrop of the failure of the entire shipbuilding program?
When was the Fleet left without new ships in the ocean zone?
Why, instead of developing a power plant (gearbox) for this project, the UEC and Zvezda were puzzled by the completely deranged power plant for the freak 20386?
Is it from stupidity?
Or from a very big mind?
Or is this mind aimed at something else, and does not see its tasks as increasing the country's defense capability and the combat capability of its Fleet?
Quite recently, on the Black Sea, a British destroyer defiantly passed through our territorial waters at full speed, and not a single Black Sea Fleet ship was able to catch up with it, or simply keep the same speed with it ...
... And even after this shame, USC continues, with the stubbornness of a rhinoceros, to impose on the Fleet an order for a new series of unarmed and slow-moving, absolutely not seaworthy and useless for anything ... "patrol boats" 22160.
Almost everything that the USC has been doing can be described in one word - failure.

[Orange bigg]

Almost everything that the USC has been doing can be described in one word - failure.

Borey-A, Yasen-M, project 667, 22350 is this also a failure? In my opinion, you are exaggerating a little. What tasks are put before the USC, it solves those. Remember how many icebreakers are being built in our country, and in fact they could build destroyer-level ships instead of them. All the same, we have a bit of such chaos in the sphere of shipbuilding strategy.

The order of the Navy for a new series of unarmed and slow-moving, absolutely not seaworthy and useless for anything ... "patrolmen" 22160.

I agree.

The draft design 22350M was ready by January last year, but there was no order for its technical design.
Why
If the new boathouse was then actively being completed, and such ships could be built on the existing stocks in the same Yantar - they had built 1155 ave. There before.
Where does this slowness come from?
And this against the backdrop of the failure of the entire shipbuilding program?
When was the Fleet left without new ships in the ocean zone?
Why, instead of developing a power plant (gearbox) for this project, the UEC and Zvezda were puzzled by the completely deranged power plant for the freak 20386?
Is it from stupidity?
Or from a very big mind?

I agree. I say we have a little chaos. How many years have we been developing Sarmat and when it’s time to test it, it turned out that the testing ground is not ready, now we are waiting for the testing ground to test Sarmat. And this is how we have it everywhere. But much better than was in the 90s, but slowly but surely.

[bayard]

Quote: OrangeBigg

Borey-A, Yasen-M, 667 project, 22350 is this also a failure?

"Borei-A" really turned out.
But.
First, he is still alone. Plus 4 "Boreas" of the first version.
But by the end of 2020, there should have been 8 of them. in the ranks.
Although with “Boreas” the failure is really less deep ...
But if you look at the project as a whole, comprehensively, then the carrier itself is quite successful, but Bulava is ... rather weak. Both the cast weight and the damage expected from the application. But we must have parity with the United States in terms of carriers. So it turns out that we have the number of missiles in stock, but at the same time the power of their warheads is two times lower ... While the "Sineva" and "Liner" on the "Dolphins" are helping out, but they just do not last forever, years after 10 everything will be written off.
And we will stay with the Bulava on the Borei ... against the Trident-2.
Here the loss was conceptual, at the stage of the terms of reference.

Quote: OrangeBigg

Ash-M

Here, too, not everything is clear. Firstly, this is not a MAPL at all, but quite a SSGN, as it was conceived back in the Soviet Union. It was supposed to be the carrier of the Onyx anti-ship missile system and supplement the series of SSGNs pr. 949 \ 949A with its series. Therefore, it turned out to be large, expensive and not at all multifunctional, because no one will send one against the enemy's submarine or destroy the enemy's communications - this is an exclusively strike SSGN capable of snarling back when attacking an enemy's submarine submarine.
In the conditions of the new Russia, it would be wiser to build the SSGN not as a separate project, but as a separate modification of the Borei. Firstly, the development would take noticeably less time and money, and secondly, such a SSGN would have much teeth in its salvo. Indeed, in its launch cups, it is capable of carrying from 80 to 112 CR (80 pieces of "Onyx" or "Zircon" or up to 112 "Caliber"). That is, its shock capabilities would have surpassed today's "Ash-M" by more than 2 times, while the price would have been two times lower.
... So Shoigu somehow gave a hint about his intention to build a certain amount (from 4 to 6 pieces) "Boreev-K". But for now, the Borea-A series has been extended, which is generally correct - they need to be built at least 12 units. And only then the Borei-K series can be produced. And so that at least 6 - 8 pieces. - so that there is enough for both theaters.
And the "Ash" has only 30 torpedoes, and it cannot fire a missile launcher from a TA.
And "Borey" has 40 torpedoes in its arsenal, and some of them can be replaced with "Caliber" or "Answer" - up to half, depending on the mission.
And "Ash" also has an open propeller and, by definition, cannot have a high low-noise speed. And "Borey" has a water cannon, which is much quieter.

Quote: OrangeBigg

,667

I didn't understand here ...
Of course, there is a merit of the Fleet and ship repair (but not the USC) in maintaining the technical condition of the Soviet Dolphins, but they still have 10 years to live ... Maybe someone after repairs and will last a little longer ...

Quote: OrangeBigg

project, 22350

The frigate as a whole turned out to be quite good ... But first of all, it was very late.
Secondly, there are only 2 of them. for the entire fleet and with the completion of the rest of the ships of the series, the circus I described above is going on.
Thirdly, it has one VERY serious flaw. Unsolved flaw.
This is a drawback in SPEED. Moreover, both in the march and in the maximum. And this disappointing fact deprives him of the initiative at sea - he will not run away from anyone and will not catch up with anyone. It will not be able to break the distance, or, on the contrary, to sharply approach each other to launch an anti-ship missile volley. The enemy will always be able to impose his tactics on him.
And this is an unforgivable flaw that the Soviet designers and the fleet command, which was the terms of reference for new ships, remembering the experience of the Russo-Japanese War, never allowed. Our ships never (!) After that did not yield to the enemy in speed.
Up to frigate 22350 and the above-described freaks of the new generation of the gloomy genius of Russian capitalism.
The hope that this misfortune and outright stupidity (or, again, sabotage) will be eliminated in new projects, rests only on the expectations of the very one - project 22350M, whose power plant is quite balanced and sufficient in power, capable of providing cruising speed not lower 18 knots and a maximum of 31 - 32 knots (2 x 14 l / s + 000 x 2 l / s = 27 l / s).
But the fact that the beginning of the laying of these critically necessary ships for the Fleet is POSTPONED again ... and for 2 (!!!) years !!! And at the same time, this will not be the bookmark of the series, but the bookmark of the "head" ... this is just a mockery of the needs of the Fleet and the country's defense capability.

Quote: OrangeBigg

All the same, we have a bit of such chaos in the sphere of shipbuilding strategy.

Have you ever thought about the nature of these shuffles?
When are all these shuffling across common sense?

Quote: OrangeBigg

How many years have we been developing Sarmat and when it’s time to test it, it turned out that the testing ground is not ready, now we are waiting for the testing ground to test Sarmat

Yes, not in the landfill there at all. Polygon, this is an excuse. It's just that the contractor has never dealt with such projects ... Kurgan has always built exclusively sea missiles, and there are sizes, and mass, and energy, and the number of blocks ... everything is different.
Such missiles were built at the Dnepropetrovsk Yuzhmash. And at once to take and repeat (even just REPEAT) this is very, VERY difficult. No one in the world has surpassed the Yangelevsky and Utka heavy missiles ... and has not achieved it.
And here is an application for even higher and exclusive dynamic characteristics + specific payload (although ordinary blocks in the amount of 10 - 15 pieces would be preferable to 3 "Vanguards").
So nonsense from the head of Rostec, the Ministry of Industry and Trade and Roscosmos ( ) can not be taken seriously - they are not experts and give empty promises to the public. Especially with timing ... ... acceptance into service and the number of planned test launches.
She (Sarmat) has never flown before. NEVER!
And it is not known HOW she will fly for the first time.
So all the statements are sheer PR and bluff. It's good if it takes off for the first time this year.
It is even better if both stages work properly.
It's just great (fantastic success) if the breeding stage also works properly.
And if the BB simulators also fly to the landfill ... , it's just a nationwide holiday.
And I am still silent about accuracy.
So, even if everything goes more or less regularly, it will take a lot of test launches - about ten. because they will climb (and they will climb) various hidden defects and jambs. And they will have to be eliminated by brainstorming and making adjustments and changes after each test.
And KB Yuzhnoye is not our assistant in this matter today.
But they would have returned the southern Russian lands to themselves in 2014, these works would have already been completed / finished in the Yuzhny Design Bureau itself. For "Sarmat" is, in fact, another modernization of the Yangelevskaya P-36. There, and the engines from it are installed - just the same engines. Both weight and dimensions are the same. So "Sarmat" is the legitimate son of the "Voevoda".

Quote: OrangeBigg

.But much better than it was in the 90s

Yes, the fact of the matter is that it is not better - not at all better. Then the PEOPLE were alive.
And many of the production could still do something.
The very same mechanics and milling workers of the 6th category (I knew some of them), on whom all production was based, were still alive.
Now they are NOT.
And those who are, can only collect ... not by nightfall, the aforementioned Il-112.
So do not flatter yourself on the promises of these characters - they are complete ignoramuses in what they lead.

[Barberry25]

It’s like building a new boathouse under SuperGorshkov.

[bayard]

Quote: Barberry25

shta? under SuperGorshkov, as if building a new boathouse,

The new boathouse was not built for "Super-Gorshkov" at all, but quite for "Leaders". Here are just the "Leaders" (at least atomic) have been abandoned, and this is good.
So we decided to lay the first two (now ONE!) 22350M in this boathouse.
simply because at the Admiralty Shipyards the slipways are now occupied by the 22350 and 22350.1 series.
And "Yantar" received an order for some more corvettes 20385.
But for 22350M today there is no power plant yet. Rather, a gearbox.
And in general, they talk more about building ships in the Russian Federation and do almost nothing.
And if they do, then how is the extraction of a tooth through the anus - they are not looking for simple ways.

Quote: Barberry25

The Improved Pot is built with 32 missiles on board.

It would be better for this "Pot" instead of diesels, M75RU gas turbines with a capacity of 7 l / s were installed in the power plant.
But this will not happen.
Therefore, let the construction be completed as it is and the "Super-Gorshkovs" are urgently laid.
Moreover, they are promised a series much more serious - from 20 to 24 pieces.
Therefore, it is necessary to abandon all nonsense such as 22160, 20386 and even additional corvettes 20380 \ 20385 (except for those already ordered) in favor of a smaller VI corvette (enlarged "Karakurt"), which can be built in Zelenodolsk and on Pella. And all the slipways at the Admiralty Shipyards, Yantar, Komsomolsk-on-Amur (Amur Shipyard) and possibly even the Zaliv in Kerch will be given for the construction of the 22350M series, which they promise to build at SEVERAL shipyards.
And it is better to give the new boathouse for the construction of larger (but not nuclear) ships VI 12 - 000 t. Nakhimov "(based on the AFAR S-14 air defense missile systems), with the S-000 and Polyment-Reduta air defense missile systems, and with the UKSK for 4 air defense systems of different types ... two helicopters. In a couple of years, it would be possible to order just such ships (they would go as the flagships of the KUG on a par with the nuclear-powered Orlans). For them, such a boathouse will be just right.
And 2024 would fit perfectly for the laying - all the components would have already been tested at the Nakhimov and Gorshkov. And the power plant for them, too, would have had time to create quite. Immediately after the power plant for 22350M.
And to build the "Super-Gorshkovs" on the stocks freed from 22350 in the Admiralty, on the "Yantar" and a little later - on the Amur and "Zaliv".
But this requires an OWNER in the country.
We need WILL - State WILL.
What is needed is Stalin and Beria, not Kerensky and "Nikolai-2", who loved ... EVERYTHING!
We need a State Strategy - a long-term development program, and a positive and CLEAR goal for the People.
But for the Kerenskys and the nikolashki there is only an electorate, "" which will have enough macaros and which "are not forced to give birth" ... to whom you can promise anything you want, but hang up ... sorry, ... but in principle, then EVERYTHING is possible.
AND CAN.

[Barberry25]

well, since they don't know how to do it, go to work at the USC, show me how to do everything .. they need specialists Otherwise they don't know how to build ships ... you learn)

[bayard]

Before they called me to Severodvinsk, but I was running my own business, they would not have paid that much. And now I have no leisure - I have been living in the war for the eighth year - in Donetsk.

[tralflot1832]

48 anti-ship missiles and anti-ship missiles and 100 anti-aircraft missile systems, worthy news for this project.!

[Barberry25]

that's about 48 missiles already on the question ... so on the Improved Pot they promise 32 missiles already, which means they can place more on eMK

[antivirus]

the most hated of the second ten Boreyev-M2M will be "Ivan IV the Terrible" ..
will be laid in 24g and put into the fleet in 33g
will mangle all partners when passing by the Faroe Islands and Hawaii.

[Flooding]

Quote: lucul

Pretty boy

compared to 955 looks more built))

[lucul]

compared to 955 looks more built))

Perfection of form

[Orange bigg]

The first 3 Boreas were built from the backlog of submarines of other projects, therefore, they turned out with a hump. Borey-A projects are built from scratch, hence the perfection of the form.

[Dart2027]

Quote: OrangeBigg

The first 3 Boreas were built from the stocks of submarines of other projects.

09710 project.

[Normann]

The main amount.

[tralflot1832]

Residents of Murmansk, forgive me for my previous posts. Bes misled this Cape Lazar, and in the background, in the distance, is the island of Kildin.

[Jacket in stock]

Well, at least here all the work is on schedule.
So you can, if "just want to and sweat a little" (c)

[Orange bigg]

So they have been building for almost 7 years. Prince Oleg also began to build in 2014, but he has already been launched.

On December 26, 2014 at OJSC Production Association Severnoye Machine-Building Enterprise (SMP, part of OJSC United Shipbuilding Corporation - USC) in Severodvinsk, the ceremony of laying down the Project 955A strategic nuclear submarine missile cruiser (09552, code Borey-A ")" Generalissimo Suvorov "(serial number 206) - the third ship of the modified project" Borey-A "and the sixth in general in the series of project 955 (" Borey ").

Previously, this boat was supposed to be called "Prince Suvorov", but this was changed for unknown reasons and the final weird name "Generalissimo Suvorov" was assigned to the ship by order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy V.V. Chirkov at the very last moment. It is reported that the new name on the NSR became known only in the morning of December 26, so it was necessary to urgently make even a very curious interruption of the name on the already made mortgage boards. The laying of the ship was timed to coincide with the 75th anniversary of the Northern Sea Route (the official date of foundation of the enterprise - December 21, 1939) and took place with the participation of the Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Dmitry Rogozin.

https://bmpd.livejournal.com/1112914.html

[bk316]

Prince Oleg also began to build in 2014, but he was already launched.

This is just understandable. This happens at the beginning of the series. Subsequent ships are built faster and faster until the technological limit is reached. And here such a series went quite well.

[mark1]

Quote: OrangeBigg

strange name "Generalissimo Suvorov"

Yes ... it is immediately clear that the Ministry of Defense read "Overhaul", but for some reason they were embarrassed and decided to cut it in half and instead of the chic - "Generalissimo Count Suvorov Rymniksky" the name was cut.

[avg]

Then the full title of A.V. Suvorov, so that when surfacing, somewhere in the English Channel area, the "partners" were completely blown away: "Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov-Rymniksky, His Serene Highness Prince of Italy, Count of the Russian and Roman Empires, Generalissimo of the Russian land and sea forces, Field Marshal Austrian and Sardinian troops, the Sardinian kingdom, the grand and prince of royal blood, holder of the orders: Russian - St. Andrew the First-Called, St. George of three degrees, St. Vladimir 1st degree, St. Alexander Nevsky; St. Anna 1st degree, St. John Jerusalem; Austrian - Maria Theresa 1st class; Prussian - Black eagle, Red eagle and "3a military merit"; Sardinian - St. Anunziata and St. Maurice and Lazarus; Kingdom of both Sicilies - St. Januarius; Bavarian - St. Hubert and golden lion, French - the Mother of God of Carmel and St. Lazarus; Polish - the White Eagle and St. Stanislav. "

[Grits]

Quote: avg

Then the full title of A.V. Suvorov

And write this aboard the ship in three lines

[Vladimir61]

Quote: avg

Then the full title of A.V. Suvorov, so that when surfacing, somewhere in the English Channel area, the "partners" were completely blown away: "Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov -...

With such sizes, in a smaller font, on both sides, and in several languages, so that forever with ... will be remembered.

[mark1]

You cannot spoil the porridge with butter, but the organic taste perception of this product is easy.

[tralflot1832]

The time has come to hand over the laid down nuclear submarines, now Borey A and Yasen M must descend every year. Gradually, the logistics with subcontractors came to a common denominator, not a step to the right. We must thank the shipbuilders of Severodvinsk, they are not only reviving the nuclear submarine fleet. There is a chance that we have 2022 year there will be six Boreys of two modifications.

[Normann]

Hurray (as many as six. Of course I am with both hands for the revival of the submarine fleet, but I think it's too early to rejoice.

[Normann]

Against one country, and even then there are few (which can compare something more or less), and against a coalition - this is a serious argument, but not final.

[Ros 56]

It always amazes me how a six-drive five-story building rushes under water at the speed of a car.

[tralflot1832]

Breshut, maximum 60 km per hour. Even minibuses rarely drive at such a speed.

[Sands Careers General]

Wow, they rivet APRKSN like hot cakes, go ahead!

[tralflot1832]

If they lay two nuclear submarines every year, things will get better.

[Sands Careers General]

Shipyards are loaded at 100))

[Tests]

Dear anonymous author, you write in 1 paragraph: "At present, the submarine cruiser is being prepared for launching." And the last paragraph of your message looks like this: "Five more submarines of the Borei-A project -" Generalissimo Suvorov "(laid down on December 26, 2014)," Emperor Alexander III "(laid down on December 18, 2015)," Prince Pozharsky "(laid down December 23, 2016), "Prince Potemkin" and "Dmitry Donskoy" (laid down on the same day on August 23, 2021) are at various stages of completion. " According to the technology of shipbuilding, the outfitting stage of the ship's construction begins with its launching and transfer to the outfitting embankment. Please, be careful, here "Dmitry Donskoy" has been going to the seas for many years, though from another project ...

[Codett]

Another would be to pull up the surface fleet so that SSBNs could be guarded normally, otherwise there are not enough kings of rank 1 there, and the condition of the remaining 956 destroyers is not very special, and new ones are not built only by repair and modernization and not always sensible, anti-submarine ships are not enough, and anti-submarine consider that there is no aviation, there are few modern minesweepers, and there are problems with landing ships, Tapirs still serve, they are generally a rarity