Expedition of a special purpose. Transfer of destroyers from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet

90

Ships of the EON-3 expedition, photo: geroisevera.ru

Exactly 85 years ago, on September 24, 1936, warships entered Provideniya Bay in the Anadyr Bay, being transferred from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet. The escort of two destroyers entered historyas Special Purpose Expedition No. 3. The uniqueness of the secret expedition was that it became the first successful escort of warships from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet along the Northern Sea Route in one navigation.

Special expeditions


Expeditions of a special purpose (EON) is a general name for a whole series of operations, which are long-term transitions of ships of the Soviet Navy from one fleet another. These operations were actively carried out both in the pre-war years and during the Great Patriotic War and even after its completion.



All expeditions were numbered, their formation took place on the basis of orders from the country's top military leadership and the fleet.

The first expedition, named EON-1, was successfully completed in 1933. Expeditions EON-1 and EON-2 consisted in the transfer of warships from Kronstadt to Murmansk along the White Sea-Baltic Canal, which had just been built by that time.

Destroyers, patrol ships and submarines were transferred to the north of the country, where the process of creating the Northern Fleet was underway, at that time still the Northern Sea Flotilla, formed only on June 1, 1933.

EON-3 became the first expedition to transfer warships from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet.

Special expeditions have been going on for over 20 years. The last of them were carried out already in the mid-1950s. So, as part of the EON-66 expedition, which became the most massive in history, in June-September 1956, 45 ships of various classes were transferred to the Far East, including two cruisers of the 68bis project: "Alexander Suvorov" and "Admiral Lazarev".

The importance of escorting warships along the Northern Sea Route


The active development of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) went on throughout the 1930s. The cruises of the icebreaking steamer Sibiryakov in 1932 and the unsuccessful expedition of the Chelyuskin in 1933 went down in history. Trapped in the ice, the Chelyuskin eventually sank in the Chukchi Sea, and the rescue of its crew members became a real epic, which was widely covered in the media and presented the country with the first Heroes of the Soviet Union.


Novik-class destroyers, November 1915, photo: wiki.wargaming.net

In turn, the wiring along the NSR of warships in 1936 remained unknown to a wide audience for a long time. The operation to transfer two destroyers from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet was classified and very difficult.

In 1936, the fire of the future World War II had already flared up in the world. In Europe, the civil war began in Spain, Germany sent troops to the Rhineland, Italy fought with Ethiopia. It was also restless in the Far East, where military operations between the troops of the Republic of China and Japan periodically took place since 1931, in 1937 they will develop into a full-scale Sino-Japanese war.

In these conditions, the USSR sought to strengthen its military presence in the troubled regions near its borders. For this in the Far East it was necessary to have a combat-ready fleet. But in the 1930s, the Soviet Union simply did not have an adequate shipbuilding industry in this region that would allow the Pacific Fleet to be replenished with new ships.

Under these conditions, the only way to replenish the Pacific Fleet was to transfer warships from other fleets. In 1936, for the first time in history from the Baltic to Vladivostok, two warships were managed in one navigation. These were the destroyers Voikov and Stalin. Their escort by the Northern Sea Route went down in history as Special Purpose Expedition No. 3.

Members of the EON-3 expedition


The expedition to escort two destroyers from the Baltic to the Pacific Ocean was quite large-scale and representative. But the two main characters were the warships. The destroyers Stalin and Voikov were transferred to the Pacific Fleet. These were the Novik-class destroyers, which were one of the most successful projects of the warships of the Russian Imperial Navy.

Expedition of a special purpose. Transfer of destroyers from the Baltic to the Pacific Fleet
Otto Yulievich Schmidt, photo 1936, wikimedia.org

Destroyers of the Novik class were actively built before the First World War and managed to take part in naval battles, including fought in the Baltic. The ships turned out to be very successful, after the end of the First World War and the Civil War in Russia, they remained in service with the Soviet fleet and were repeatedly modernized, in particular by strengthening anti-aircraft weapons.

In total, up to 3 ships took part in the EON-14 expedition. In addition to destroyers, full-fledged icebreakers were included in the expedition, taking into account the experience of the Sibiryakov and Chelyuskin campaigns. These were the icebreakers "Ermak", "Litke", "Krasin", "Lenin", the ice-going steamer "Sadko". In addition, tankers Maikop and Anadyr, transport Lok-Batan and other vessels took part in the expedition.

Not only naval sailors, but also Soviet scientists and polar explorers, included in EON-3, took part in the conduct of warships by the Northern Sea Route. Was actively involved in pilotage of ships and polar aviation... A group of Anatoly Alekseev's planes was directly involved in studying the ice situation along the route of the expedition.

The expedition was commanded by Captain 1st Rank Pyotr Evdokimov. He was an experienced officer who received a naval education back in tsarist Russia. At the same time, the sailors did not have real experience in performing such ice voyages, so the famous scientist, mathematician and polar navigator Otto Yulievich Schmidt was made the head of the expedition.

At that time, any schoolchild in the country knew the name of Schmitd. All significant Soviet Arctic expeditions of that time were directly connected with his name. He took part in the voyages of the icebreaking steamer Sibiryakov and the steamer Chelyuskin. By the time of EON-3, Otto Schmitd headed the Main Directorate of the Northern Sea Route.


Ships of the EON-3 expedition, photo: geroisevera.ru

To help the captains of the destroyers Stalin (Viktor Obukhov) and Voikov (Maxim Sukhorukov), experienced polar captains of the civilian fleet, Pavel Milovzorov and Nikolai Nikolaev, were identified. They were all experienced sailors. Nikolaev was a hereditary sailor, the son of the famous polar captain Mikhail Nikolaev. Milovzorov had vast experience in sea work. He became a long-distance navigator back in 1899, and made his first Arctic voyage in 1911 on the Kolyma steamer.

The personnel of the expedition ensured its successful completion. On July 29, 1936, the destroyers as part of the EON-3 expedition left Soroka (today Belomorsk) for the White Sea.

At dawn on September 24, 1936, albeit not without incident, the ships arrived at Provideniya Bay, where they were met by the commander of the Pacific Fleet, the 1st rank fleet flagship Mikhail Viktorov. There, in the bay, ships began to mount weapons, which were separately transported on the expedition's transport.

What difficulties did the EON-3 participants face?


The task of escorting two destroyers to the Pacific Fleet was assigned to the command of the Baltic Fleet in April 1936. At that time, it was quite difficult, which was confirmed by the severity of the climate, difficult ice conditions, as well as the cruise of the steamer "Chelyuskin", which was crushed by ice and sank.

Until 1936, warships were never transferred from the Baltic to the Pacific Ocean along the Northern Sea Route within the framework of one navigation. In addition to the objective difficulties associated with navigating ships in difficult ice conditions, there was another problem - ensuring the secrecy of the expedition.

EON-3 was a top-secret fleet operation. During the campaign, artillery and torpedo weapons were dismantled from the destroyers, their crew was reduced to a minimum. For reasons of secrecy, their names were removed from the warships, the lifebuoys on the sides were inverted with inscriptions inward. The names of the ships were also removed from the ribbons of sailor's peakless caps.


Ships of the EON-3 expedition, photo: geroisevera.ru

The EON-3 expedition radiograms were given the code name "Zarya". After the appearance of this code on the air, all northern radio stations were ordered to stop transmitting radio messages. At the same time, the very radio communication between the ships of the expedition was ordered to be reduced to a minimum, it was allowed only in extraordinary circumstances.

It should be noted that the Novik-class destroyers were not designed to operate in such difficult northern navigation conditions; they were not ice-class ships. Therefore, the organizers of the campaign initially had to solve a difficult task in order to protect the thin skin of warships from a possible collision with ice floes.

To protect the hulls of destroyers, engineer Alexander Dubravin proposed a special project to create a wooden-metal "coat", which was supposed to keep the hulls of the ships intact during a long cruise in the ice.

In addition to the purely military goal of strengthening the combat capabilities of the Pacific Fleet, the expedition also performed civilian missions. The composition of the expedition and the number of ships involved made it possible to solve simultaneously the issues of supplying the northern regions of the USSR with various economic cargo. First of all, ports and bases located on the Northern Sea Route.

The EON-3 campaign was very important. He proved the possibility of escorting warships to Vladivostok and other ports of the Far East by the northern route. Later, before the start of the Great Patriotic War, several more submarines will move to the Pacific Fleet from the Baltic. And already in 1942, the reverse process will begin, when warships, which will be more needed in the northern theater of operations, will go to the Northern Fleet from the Far East along the NSR.
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    24 September 2021 06: 24
    Thanks to the author for reminding me of this significant event, which we have already forgotten about.
  2. +17
    24 September 2021 06: 32
    The author somehow forgot to mention that the first stage of the wiring took place along the White Sea-Baltic Canal.

    Ice cutter "F. Litke" - the leader of the escort of destroyers in 1936.

    The destroyer "Stalin" - the flagship of the Pacific Fleet, 1939-1940.

    The sailors of the destroyer "Stalin". Vladivostok, 1939
    1. +11
      24 September 2021 06: 42
      The author somehow forgot to mention that the first stage of the wiring took place along the White Sea-Baltic Canal.
      And this is what he has then
      The first expedition, named EON-1, was successfully completed in 1933. Expeditions EON-1 and EON-2 consisted in the transfer of warships from Kronstadt to Murmansk along the White Sea-Baltic Canal, which had just been built by that time.
      I join the words of gratitude of the previous speakers to the author for reminding me of this glorious page in our history!
      1. +12
        24 September 2021 06: 49
        And this is about EON-1 and EON-2. smile
        I decided to get ahead of you, dear Crow, otherwise instead of one line of mine you would have hung out a couple of sheets. hi
        1. +11
          24 September 2021 08: 51
          And rightly so, and we are very grateful to you, and ... this is ... as it is, I forgot ... Ah! Velma, I think this is more productive (than complaining about the lack of information and dryness of the article) and cognitive - one remembered something, the other I hung out a couple of sheets, the third added something interesting, the fourth ... It's okay, it's all lyrics - that's who will help, otherwise I'm completely confused: in some sources
          The expedition was commanded by Captain 1st Rank Pyotr Evdokimov.
          In others
          The military was headed by M.V. Viktorov
          In the photo by Mark Troyanovsky
          like Viktorov ..
          1. +8
            24 September 2021 09: 25
            Up to 14 ships took part in the campaign, the entire expedition was led by Otto Yulievich Schmidt, who at that time was head of Glavsevmorput. On the military side, the expedition was headed by the flagship of the 1st rank fleet Mikhail Vladimirovich Viktorov, the commander of the Pacific Fleet (officer of the Russian fleet, shot in 1938, rehabilitated in 1956).
            On the net, I found only brief information about this campaign, replicated by several sites, as usual, without pointing to the source. There M.V. Viktorov is not mentioned at all, as well as Schmidt.

            Troyanovskiy A.M.
            Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Senior Researcher IPP RAS

            He does not mention Kapraz Evdokimov at all, perhaps because Viktorov was shot and later Kapraz Evdokimov appeared?

            "Due to the secrecy regime, the diary does not contain the names of warships, and the names of their captains are not indicated. The destroyers Stalin and Voikov were numbered 47 (Kucherov S.G. and Milovzorov P.G.) and No. 48 (captain Obukhov). The experience of the "Sibiryakov" and "Chelyuskin" campaigns was taken into account, the convoy of ships was accompanied by icebreakers. ", icebreaker" Sadko "(Nikolaev NM), tankers" Anadyr "(Bochek A.P.) and" Maikop ", transport" Lok-Batan ", etc. In addition to the crew, scientists were included. aviation." (with)
            1. +4
              24 September 2021 10: 09
              He does not mention Kapraz Evdokimov at all, perhaps because Viktorov was shot and later Kapraz Evdokimov appeared?

              Kostya hi
              my post about Evdokimov is below, from it it is clear why they do not mention
        2. 0
          24 September 2021 09: 40
          The expedition was commanded by Captain 1st Rank Pyotr Evdokimov. He was an experienced officer who received a naval education back in tsarist Russia.

          And why did the author keep silent about the biography of Evdokimov? Shy?
          In vain. Yes It is on the website "Officer Corps of the Army of Lieutenant General A.A. Vlasov 1944-1945" posted in detail

          Evdokimov was born in 1893, graduated from the Naval Corps in 1914, and navigator officer classes in 1917. Yevdokimov served on the Baltic Sea. In October 1917, he was the senior officer of the destroyer Attentive. After the October Revolution of 1917, he went into the service of the Bolsheviks, reaching certain heights in his service career. During the Civil War, Evdokimov served in the Onega flotilla, occupying the positions of the commander of the patrol ship "Koketka" (from November 1918), the commander of the patrol ship "Zarya" (in August 1919), the chief of the battalion of barrage ships of the flotilla. Since 1920, he again served in the Baltic, as commander of various ships (destroyers Zheleznyakov, Lenin, Karl Marx, etc.) and formations. Since February 1934, Evdokimov commanded the 2nd destroyer battalion of the Baltic Sea Forces. seas. On March 15, 1936, he was awarded the military rank of captain of the 1st rank, and on February 25 of the following year, he was awarded the Order of Lenin. In March 1938 Evdokimov took command of the 3rd destroyer battalion. However, Evdokimov, as a specialist from the “former”, was not spared by the wave of political repressions. On August 8, 1938, he was arrested by the NKVD on the "standard" accusation for many of participation in a military-fascist conspiracy. On July 14, 1939, Evdokimov was convicted, but at the beginning of the next year the court, having considered his case, released and rehabilitated the sailor. Perhaps from that moment his personal resentment against the Soviet regime arose, which led Evdokimov to the Russian Liberation Army (ROA) during the Great Patriotic War. On April 11, 1940 Evdokimov was appointed chief of staff of the Training Squadron of the ships of the VVMU named after MB. Frunze. On July 18, 1941, Evdokimov became chief of staff of a squadron of ships of the Baltic Fleet. On March 21, 1942, he was appointed commander of the Special Purpose Ships Detachment of the Baltic Fleet. In December 1941, Evdokimov commanded the Joseph Stalin liner, on which the brave defenders of the Hanko Peninsula were leaving. On the night of December 3, 1941, "Stalin" as part of a convoy of ships left the Hanko base. The ships went in formation, in front - three minesweepers, then two more, followed by the destroyer "Stoyky", the turbo-electric ship "I. Stalin ", the destroyer" Slavny ", another minesweeper, the boat" Yamb "closed the line. There was also an escort detachment of seven boats of sea hunters and four torpedo boats. On the night of December 3, the liner was blown up by a mine. Of the 6 thousand people who were on it, Soviet ships were able to save only 1740 people. On December 5, German minesweepers and two schooners approached the abandoned ship, which took off the remaining sailors (however, a small part of them tried to reach the coast on their own, but they all disappeared). It was then that Evdokimov was captured. On April 1, 1942, he was removed from the Navy's lists as missing.
          In captivity Evdokimov was, starting from the last days of March 1942, in various camps. Since the end of the year, Evdokimov began to cooperate with Finnish intelligence and the Abwehr, as well as teach in various intelligence schools. In October 1944, Evdokimov met with the Chief of Staff of the KONR Armed Forces, Major General F.I. Trukhin in Berlin and applied for admission to this organization. In December, Evdokimov was appointed to the department of educational institutions of the headquarters of the armed forces and certified as a colonel in the German army. On May 9, 1945, Evdokimov fled to the West and surrendered to representatives of the 26th Infantry Division of the 3rd American Army in the Kaplice-Krumau region (Czech Republic). In captivity, he was held in the camps of Kladenska Rovna, Friedberg, Hanaker (Landau). In July, Evdokimov passed himself off as an old emigrant and was released by the Americans from the camp in Ganaker, avoiding extradition to the USSR. After some time, Evdokimov managed to move to the United States, where he lived under the name Alexander and died in Washington on May 4, 1965.
          link: https://biography.wikireading.ru/109901
          1. +4
            24 September 2021 10: 49
            Thank you Dima! smile
            Here is the wrong side of all types of political repression, an honest man Viktorov was shot, and the traitor happily lived to old age. Although, I will not undertake to judge anyone, Sovetska power was able to educate and breed enemies. But there were people who, despite the repression, torture and humiliation of stupid bone breakers, after their release served the Motherland and fought well, as the most striking example - Konstantin Rokossovsky.
            1. +3
              24 September 2021 12: 26
              Why go far. Look at the next article - Axel Ivanovich Berg. The son of the Tsar's Lieutenant General, was arrested in 1938, but nevertheless became a Hero of Socialist Labor, Academician, Admiral-Engineer and Deputy Minister of Defense of the USSR.
            2. +3
              24 September 2021 19: 28
              Here I think: how the country changes every decade, and even more often. And many had enough endurance and character to separate the service to the Fatherland from the superficial.
              1. +3
                25 September 2021 09: 59
                Not everyone, obviously, is capable, and life develops in different ways.
            3. -1
              22 November 2021 00: 38
              No, it's just that this Evdokimov is rotten scum, an opportunist and a pathological traitor.
          2. 0
            27 October 2021 09: 16
            Well, Evdokimov could not serve in the Wehrmacht, and even a colonel - it was only the lot of the citizens of the Reich! I noticed that Wikipedia often gives false information. I have no doubt that years will pass and some nonsense and nonsense will also be written about me.
  3. +11
    24 September 2021 07: 20
    What difficulties did the EON-3 participants face?

    The author decided not to write about the difficulties, limiting himself to the title. And there were a lot of difficulties up to the fact that in the Kara Sea, hitting the old ice, the ships stood up and stood for almost a month.


    The question was to stop wiring altogether.
    1. +7
      24 September 2021 11: 26
      Quote: Undecim
      The author decided not to write about the difficulties, limiting himself to the title.

      Yes ... even in Kuskov's "Ships of October" and that transition is described in more detail.
      "Fur coats" and heavy steel screws have fully justified themselves. But even with the icebreaker, the movement of the caravan slowed down more and more. In a week, they managed to get only to the meridian of the eastern coast of the Pyasinsky Bay, where they had to stop again, waiting for the ice to thin. Taking advantage of the forced parking at a small island, the destroyer "Stalin" carried out routine repairs. They even managed to inspect the underwater part of the hull. The divers did not find any damage there, except for some minor dents that were not significant.
      The ice conditions did not improve, and according to the forecast, even greater ice consolidation was expected. All that remained was to push forward. The ships and vessels of the expedition continued to move. On the approaches to the Vilkitsky Strait, the ice became denser, the caravan moved more and more slowly. Finally the icebreaker "Lenin" was unable to break the ice. In all directions from the ships to the very horizon stretched huge ice floes, rallied almost into a solid mass. Rumbly, they clutched the hulls of the ships. The sharp corners of the ice floes rested against the skin.
      The ship's subversive party of the destroyer "Stalin" began to fight the ice. Miners placed small charges in the corners of the ice floes. The explosions destroyed the edges of ice that threatened to pierce the side of the destroyer, and covered the space in the immediate vicinity of the hull with icy fines. The snow-ice porridge for some time held back the pressure of the blocks, but after a while the ice floes, continuously moving along the side, created a new dangerous situation. Sometimes the destroyer commander directed the ice blasting. Obukhov in the recent past was a miner, he knew the subversive business well.
      Be that as it may, but the movement to the east continued. Sometimes on its own, sometimes drifting along with the ice, the caravan covered mile after mile. In two weeks they managed to pass the Laptev Sea and the East Siberian Sea. We were approaching the Long Strait when we saw the Krasin icebreaker coming towards us in the east.
      Two line icebreakers are strength. Things immediately went more fun. And the most difficult part of the path has already been left behind. On September 20, the caravan passed the edge of solid ice. Almost immediately behind it, the destroyers fell into the first Far Eastern (although not yet Pacific) storm for them. The floating ice impeded the breeding of a large wave, but it itself posed a great threat. Ice floes, chaotically rushing by the will of the wind, beat on the sides with terrible force. It is unlikely that there would have been no holes if it had not been for the well-made "fur coats" in Kronstadt.
    2. +5
      24 September 2021 12: 52
      A good start and somehow it all ended abruptly! And I would like to read about the drinking of the campaign. Very sorry. True, comments help out.
  4. +2
    24 September 2021 07: 46
    Destroyers, patrol ships and submarines were transferred to the north of the country, where the process of creating the Northern Fleet was going on, at that time still the Northern Sea Flotillaformed only on June 1, 1933.


    False: yet 19 June 1916 year was officially established Flotilla of the Arctic Ocean.

    On October 7, 1917, the Arctic Ocean Flotilla had 89 combat and auxiliary vessels
    ..
    The active development of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) went on throughout the 1930s.

    Active development (scientific and practical) The NSR went on for a long time in 1930: even in the days of Russia, rails for construction were imported along the NSR Trans-Siberian Railway.

    And the first through passage of the Northern Sea Route by the Russian expedition was the hydrographic expedition of the Arctic Ocean under the leadership of a wonderful Russian officer Boris Vilkitsky , the hero of the RYAV and PMV, on the icebreaking ships "Taimyr" and "Vaygach" in 1914-1915, which, by the way, were warships in WWI

    Research and work were carried out on the NSR at Russian government in 1919 d and at the same time the Committee of the Northern Sea Route was created

    destroyers "Stalin" and "Voikov"
    These are the Russian destroyers Samson and Lieutenant Ilyin, named after the Hero of the Battle of Chesme, and not some terrorist-killer Voikov, who not only had nothing to do with the sea, but who did not work for a day.
    1. +3
      24 September 2021 08: 22
      The "Petersburg authorities" were late. Only in 1916 did they decide to take care of the protection of the northern borders. However, as was the case with the Far Eastern borders.
      The king is far away ... And no one cares.
      Until "thunder struck" for some in 1904. For others later.
      1. +4
        24 September 2021 10: 55
        Only in 1916 did they decide to take care of the protection of the northern borders
        There, until 1915, there was not much to defend.
        Alexey! hi
        1. +3
          24 September 2021 11: 13
          And walruses with polar bears from Norwegian poachers? hi
          1. +3
            24 September 2021 11: 26
            Uh-huh, and the Sami with reindeer.
            1. +2
              24 September 2021 11: 58
              And the reindeer, which is worse than the Sami?
              All under the protection of the Guarantor - Tsar-Father !!! Even lemings ... hi
              1. +2
                24 September 2021 12: 40
                Deer are better, they don't drink vodka. But lemmings definitely do not need to be protected.
        2. +3
          24 September 2021 11: 24
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          Only in 1916 did they decide to take care of the protection of the northern borders
          There, until 1915, there was not much to defend.
          Alexey! hi

          that's it. Here comes the thesis of the cat Matroskin - in order to "defend" something, this "something" must first be built, mastered, settled in, everyday life and prospective. The Crimean campaign, of course, showed that the adversary was not averse to considering the north as a battlefield and local disturbing naval operations, but in general the Empire did not consider this bearish corner with fishing camps and sawmills dangerous for itself. Inertia in relation to the development of the North, of course, does not paint imperial power.
          1. +3
            24 September 2021 11: 54
            They thought about Kamchatka and Sakhalin in a similar way! And then "Count PoluSakhalinsky was born"!
            And in general, in those days, little thought about "distant frontiers". As it is now - "do not look beyond the Moscow Ring Road"!
            Is there life outside the Moscow Ring Road ???
            North, Far East, Central Asia!
            Until the "cock-fiery comb" pecked at the fifth point ...
            In the Far East, the neighbors "suddenly" turned out to be very belligerent.
            In the North, there was the only nearest port through which it was possible to receive materials and weapons purchased from the allies.
            In Central Asia, "suddenly" the local subjects of the White Tsar Father did not like the mobilization "to dig trenches" and blood poured out ...
            1. 0
              27 October 2021 09: 47
              But there is no need to simplify about Central Asia - everything is much more complicated there. And these lands have been part of the Republic of Ingushetia since the end of the 1930th century. There, the Englishwoman shit more ... And, specifically. And after all, bastards, almost in the XNUMXs they did a lot of harm and trouble -
              there the Basmachi were liquidated only by the beginning of the war. The local people there are kind and simple, but the English "curators" set the people up against any power - even against the tsar, even against the general secretaries.
              (In the past I was lucky enough to live and work in the former republics of Central Asia. Working next to the locals, I naturally became friends, there were informal relationships, I went to visit them. And I sometimes asked old local residents this question about Basmachism. And everyone had an answer approximately one - without supplies and bases in Iran and Afghanistan, the Basmachi would quickly surrender and everything would work out. So, Great Britain was our worst enemy in this corner of the earth. For RI, for the USSR, as now.)
              1. 0
                27 October 2021 11: 59
                Or maybe they just didn't want to fight - "pacifists"!
                Those who did not consider themselves to be indebted to the White Tsar in St. Petersburg.
                1. 0
                  27 October 2021 13: 26
                  Hmm, but I did not even consider such a variant, however.
                  1. 0
                    27 October 2021 14: 01
                    When the Bolsheviks decided to mobilize among the Karelians, they heard that it is better to die of hunger in the forest than to die in the Polish swamps.
      2. +3
        24 September 2021 11: 19
        Quote: hohol95
        The "Petersburg authorities" were late. Only in 1916 did they decide to take care of the protection of the northern borders.


        Building cities Alexandrovsk was done as soon as possible - within three years. On July 7, 1899, Nicholas II approved the opinion of the State Council on assigning the name Aleksandrovsk to the urban settlement and port at the Yekaterininskaya harbor and renaming the Kola district of the Arkhangelsk province to Aleksandrovsk. The official opening of the city took place July 6 / June 24, 1899

        Opening ceremony of Aleksandrovsk-on-Murman on June 24, 1899.

        This is today's Polar.
        1. +3
          24 September 2021 11: 44
          Quote: Olgovich
          The construction of the city of Aleksandrovsk was completed in the shortest possible time - within three years. July 7, 1899 Nicholas II

          Small commercial port for local logistics? One "Bakan" was enough to protect the fishery. And in Arkhangelsk in 1862, the admiralty and the military port were abolished. The northern vector of imperial power was, you see, Olgovich, rather rickety. The share of the White Sea and the Arctic Ocean in the total Russian sea cargo turnover at the beginning of the century was 2%.
          1. 0
            24 September 2021 11: 54
            Quote: Ashes of Klaas
            Small commercial port for local logistics? One "Bakan" was enough to protect the fishery

            Not really:. The reason for the decision of the Naval Department of the Russian Empire about construction was the active development of the German fleet and the expectation of the completion of the construction by the Germans of the Kiel Canal, which connected the Baltic and North Seas, as well as the impossibility in winter to carry out the withdrawal of ships from the Gulf of Finland in the event of a war with Great Britain
            Quote: Ashes of Klaas
            And in Arkhangelsk in 1862, the admiralty and the military port were abolished.

            And a railway was laid to Arkhangelsk, connecting the port with all of Russia
            Quote: Ashes of Klaas
            The northern vector of imperial power was, you see, Olkovich, rather rickety. The share of the White Sea and the Arctic Ocean in the total Russian sea cargo turnover at the beginning of the century was 2%.

            how much was required then, it was so much.

            When life forced the city of RnM to build the world's FIRST railroad beyond the Arctic Circle with a unique filtering dam.
            1. +4
              24 September 2021 12: 29
              Quote: Olgovich
              and waiting for the completion of the construction by the Germans of the Kiel Canal, which connected the Baltic and North Seas, as well as the impossibility in winter to carry out the withdrawal of ships from the Gulf of Finland in the event of a war with Great Britain

              Eh, and Timonov in 1900 in Paris received the gold medal of the exhibition for his project of the White Sea Canal. It was expensive. And only the brilliant manager, Comrade Stalin, found free labor. But in general, what the canal army have done in a year and a half is, without pathos, a labor feat.
              1. +1
                24 September 2021 13: 12
                In the Russian Empire then it was considered more profitable to send "free labor" to the island of Sakhalin.
                Or scatter over the "depths of Siberian ores" ...
                1. +2
                  24 September 2021 14: 32
                  Quote: hohol95

                  Or scatter over the "depths of Siberian ores" ...

                  According whole 19th century, the number of those exiled to Siberia - 865t. people
                  1. +1
                    24 September 2021 15: 14
                    Is it together with the Poles or without the Poles sent to serve in distant garrisons?
                  2. +1
                    24 September 2021 15: 51
                    By 1900 there were about 310 thousand exiles from Siberia.
                  3. 0
                    24 September 2021 22: 24
                    If the management had a desire to "dig channels", then the hands of the diggers and the shovels themselves would be found in a moment ...
                    Porsto did not want to "get dirty" ...
                2. +1
                  25 September 2021 15: 36
                  In the Russian Empire, then it was considered more profitable to send "free labor" to the island of Sakhalin

                  Convicts participated in the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway and the Amur dirt road, or as it was also called "wheel".
              2. 0
                24 September 2021 14: 28
                Quote: Ashes of Klaas
                Eh, and Timonov in 1900 in Paris received the gold medal of the exhibition for his project of the White Sea Canal. It was expensive.


                There is also the Grand Prix and Big golden medal "for architectural excellence and excellent technical performance" was awarded railway bridge across the Yenisei (Krasnoyarsk bridge), построенный under the guidance of engineer Evgeny Karlovich Knorre on the project Professor L. D. Proskuryakov. (the greatest Russian engineer from the peasant class. Moscow still has his bridge).

                Eiffel, chairman of the jury, was delighted.

                They also built this bridge and the world's greatest Alekseevsky bridge (the USSR could not build it longer) and the greatest railway in the world in the shortest possible time

                So Belomor would have been built, and the Volkhov (started in kind before the VOR), and the Dnieper hydroelectric power station (the project is also up to the VOR) - only without terrible casualties and kneading the concrete of the Dnipro HPP dams with bare feet
                1. +1
                  24 September 2021 19: 25
                  Quote: Olgovich
                  So Belomor would have been built

                  No doubt. But that would be a slightly different story)
              3. 0
                14 October 2021 21: 38
                Under Catherine II and earlier, fabulous trillions of those rubles were invested in the construction of canals to St. Petersburg and from the Kama to the Volga ... the labor force was also free - they drove the peasants and runners
            2. +4
              24 September 2021 12: 31
              When life forced the city of RnM to build the world's FIRST railroad beyond the Arctic Circle with a unique filtering dam.
              Key words: "when life forced." But life forced it too late and the region received development already under Soviet rule.
              Andrew! hi
              1. -3
                24 September 2021 14: 36
                Quote: 3x3zsave
                Key words: "when life forced."

                Hello Anton. hi

                And once it was different? Incl. after?
                Quote: 3x3zsave
                But life forced it too late and the region received development already under Soviet rule.

                late as to what?
                And without the power, there would be no development in the country with the highest rates of economic and population growth?
                1. 0
                  24 September 2021 14: 43
                  Andrey, let's think about what exactly was the impetus for the industrial development of the Kola Peninsula?
                  1. +1
                    24 September 2021 19: 38
                    Quote: 3x3zsave
                    Andrey, let's think about what exactly was the impetus for the industrial development of the Kola Peninsula?

                    World War I. "Second Dardanelles")
                    1. 0
                      24 September 2021 19: 42
                      I think no. When the empire survived, there would be a second Port Arthur.
                      1. 0
                        24 September 2021 22: 39
                        Quote: 3x3zsave
                        I think no. When the empire survived, there would be a second Port Arthur.

                        Yeah, yeah .... RIF fought in Black and Baltic in the First, by the way, more subserviently than the RKKF in WWII, actually. Don’t you?
                      2. +1
                        25 September 2021 18: 10
                        And what was the valor there, especially in the Baltic?
        2. 0
          24 September 2021 11: 56
          And then there were many warships at the berths in Aleksandrovsk-on-Murman?
      3. +2
        25 September 2021 16: 06
        The "Petersburg authorities" were late. Only in 1916 did they decide to take care of the protection of the northern borders. However, as was the case with the Far Eastern borders.

        If you do not know, then by the beginning of the war the wise leadership of the USSR in the North also had almost no fleet. The largest warships were destroyers, in the amount of only 8 units, including the tsarist "noviks". And during the war it was necessary to urgently strengthen it, incl. due to the transfer of ships from the Far East. And there, since you are so worried about the Far East, and so there was one trifle. The largest ships were also destroyers with two leaders. That is, they exposed the already weak fleet. Most of the fleet, as in WWI, was concentrated in two puddles: in the Baltic and in the Black Sea.
    2. +5
      24 September 2021 10: 37
      Quote: Olgovich
      named in honor of the Hero of the Battle of Chesme, and not some terrorist-killer Voykov

      Well, after Ilyin he was Trotsky and also Garibaldi. Why did Garibaldi not please them?
      In general, of course, "Novikov" was pretty much Jewish - Voikov, Uritsky, Trotsky, Rykov, Volodarsky ...
  5. +5
    24 September 2021 08: 23
    Aeons were not few, here a whole series of articles can be devoted.
  6. +7
    24 September 2021 09: 16
    The first name of the "Voykov" after the construction was "Lieutenant Ilyin" It is in honor of the hero of the Battle of Chesme. Remember the fire ships that set fire to the ships of the Turkish fleet? So, Lieutenant Ilyin commanded the fire-ships and he himself was on one of the fire-ships.
    It is noteworthy not only the long-term service of em "Voikov" in the USSR Navy - until the 60s, but also the longevity of one of its commanders, who was left to serve in the Baltic, and another commander led Voikov to the Far East. This is the commander of "Voikov" Novikov, later a cont-admiral, who was born even before the laying of the em "Lieutenant Ilyin" survived for thirty years the entire service of "Ilyin-Voikov", and it lasted forty years, and died almost a century-old country admiral in retired in 90 years.
    The first name of the em "Stalin" after the construction was "Samson", distinguished himself in the First World War in the Baltic. So "Samson" was called until 1922, and from 1922 until 1946 it was called "Stalin" Since 1946, "Stalin" was again renamed into "Samson", Why, I don't know. Tell us who you know the story of "Samson-Stalin-Samson"
    1. +4
      24 September 2021 10: 21
      Quote: north 2
      and from 1922 to 1946 it was called "Stalin" Since 1946, "Stalin" was again renamed into "Samson", Why, I don't know

      Nda, for the anecdote told in the cockpit about "Samson-Stalin", who has all the strength in his mustache, one could probably sit down. winked
      In December 1946, "Stalin" was transferred to the category of "non-self-propelled training ships". For such an incapacitated veteran to bear the name of Comrade Stalin, this is clear sabotage and shadow casting.
      1. +3
        24 September 2021 10: 49
        Quote: Ashes of Klaas
        Quote: north 2
        and from 1922 to 1946 it was called "Stalin" Since 1946, "Stalin" was again renamed into "Samson", Why, I don't know

        Nda, for the anecdote told in the cockpit about "Samson-Stalin", who has all the strength in his mustache, one could probably sit down. winked
        In December 1946, "Stalin" was transferred to the category of "non-self-propelled training ships". For such an incapacitated veteran to bear the name of Comrade Stalin, this is clear sabotage and shadow casting.

        thanks for the convincing version ...
        1. +2
          24 September 2021 11: 06
          Quote: north 2
          thanks for the convincing version ...

          Well, there is a version that the old man was renamed, because, they say, on the Federation Council at that time the name "Stalin" was given a new EM. I did not find a destroyer with that name in the lists of the Northern Fleet.
          1. +4
            24 September 2021 11: 22
            Quote: Ashes of Klaas

            Well, there is a version that the old man was renamed, because, they say, on the Federation Council at that time the name "Stalin" was given a new EM. I did not find a destroyer with that name in the lists of the Northern Fleet.

            Destroyers of the "Prudent" type (project 30-K) - 10 units

            HUNTER, from 1.1 2.1946 - STALIN (serial number 104). Laid down on 25.6.1940. at the plant number 402 and 25,9.1940 enlisted in the lists of ships of the Navy, launched on 19.7.1947, entered into operation on 29.9.1948. and on 26.10.1948/28.1.1958/3.4.1958, having raised the naval flag, became part of the Federation Council. On 1958 January 1959, it was withdrawn from service and disbanded, and on XNUMX, it was disarmed, expelled from the Navy in connection with the transfer to the OFI for dismantling and implementation, and in XNUMX - XNUMX. on the basis of "Glavvtorchermet" in Murmansk was cut into metal.
            © S.S.Berezhnoy. Soviet Navy 1945-1995. Cruisers, large anti-submarine ships, destroyers. "Marine Collection", No. 1, 1995
            1. +2
              24 September 2021 11: 48
              aha, here he is! Thank you, Alexey.
          2. +4
            24 September 2021 11: 39
            Although, PMSM, the fact that the name "Stalin" was assigned to "Okhotnik" is already a consequence. And the reason was the complete wear and tear of "Samson". So the navy decided to transfer the name to the newest EV, out of harm's way, which can be released at least outside the base. And in a political sense, such a name aboard a wreck standing at the pier ... unsafe.
            The body, main machines and boilers are worn out. Despite the wartime, the use of the ship for combat missions was considered impossible.... Its capabilities to support the activities of other ships became very limited. In 1944 he already not allowed to go outside the Peter the Great Gulf.

            But the destroyer was still needed by the fleet. In January - August 1945, it was repaired and transferred to a newly formed detachment of training ships. It housed the command of the detachment. As the detachment expanded its activities, the attitude towards the ship changed. Due to the limitation of the navigation area, he could not take part in solving many educational tasks. For this reason, it was placed at the disposal of the Fleet Training Detachment.

            During this period, one of the newest destroyers of the Northern Fleet, the Hunter, was renamed the destroyer Stalin, and the veteran ship was given its old name Samson. At this time, he was again carefully examined and made a decision on the conservation of the main mechanisms and on the use of the ship only in the parking lot at the wall... In essence, this was the end of the destroyer's service.
            © Kuskov V.P. Ships of October.
            1. +1
              24 September 2021 11: 58
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Although, PMSM, the fact that the name "Stalin" was assigned to "Okhotnik" is already a consequence.

              difficult to establish a causal relationship, I agree.
  7. +3
    24 September 2021 09: 30
    Later, before the start of the Great Patriotic War, several more submarines will move to the Pacific Fleet from the Baltic.


    Cap3 Zaidulin (Shch-423) was the first to sail his boat along the NSR on 05.08-17.10.1940. during EON-10.
    A very interesting transition.
    73 days (56 running) / 7227 miles (682 - in ice). Sometimes in tow.
  8. -1
    24 September 2021 09: 48
    The first expedition, named EON-1, was successfully completed in 1933.

    Comrades Stalin, Voroshilov, Kirov and Yagoda on this occasion, having passed on board "Comrade Anokhin" by the Belomorkanal, on July 22.07.1933, XNUMX, honored the port of Soroka with a personal presence, where they examined the EON ships.
    It’s clear that the sycophants immediately hurried up and “cast in granite” (c) a 10-meter plaque in honor of the “personally modest” leader:
    1. +3
      24 September 2021 13: 09
      Plus I put it, although I do not quite agree with the "sycophants". This reasoning, let's say, is modern, and the contemporaries of the described event thought differently, in any case, most of them. Again the quote: "There was a personality cult, but there was also a personality"
  9. +3
    24 September 2021 11: 46
    GREAT! Unfortunately, little known ...
  10. +1
    24 September 2021 16: 25
    And when it was needed, the Pacific Fleet helped the Northern Fleet. In 1942, the transition of the destroyer division began (the leader of the destroyers "Baku", the destroyers "Resolute", "Reasonable", "Furious") made a round the world. At the same time, an unidentified submarine sank the destroyer "Resolute". In 1943, "Baku", "Furious" and "Reasonable" arrived at the Northern Fleet and took part in the hostilities.
    1. +2
      24 September 2021 19: 19
      Quote: Boris Epstein
      And when it was needed, the Pacific Fleet helped the Northern Fleet. In 1942, the transition of the destroyer division began

      In the fall of 42, in three groups, 2 Leninists and 4 Eski left the Pacific Fleet for the Northern Fleet.
      In this transition, Gusarova on the L-16 drowned the I-25 with a torpedo.
    2. 0
      25 September 2021 18: 26
      "Resolute" died in a navigation accident in 1938. What kind of submarine are you talking about? Where did you read this nonsense? And yes, there was not "Resolute" but "Zealous" who, due to an accident, could not continue his journey.
      1. 0
        26 September 2021 09: 38
        Read the book "Red Banner Pacific Fleet. 3rd Edition, revised and supplemented, of the Order of the Red Banner of Labor Military Publishing House of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR, Moscow, 1981." And the commander of the destroyer was the future Admiral of the USSR Fleet SG Gorshkov. He was not convicted or punished.
        1. +1
          26 September 2021 14: 38
          Quote: Boris Epstein
          And the commander of the destroyer was the future Admiral of the USSR Fleet SG Gorshkov. He was not convicted or punished.

          For starters, Gorshkov was not the commander of the Resolute EM. At the time of the sinking of the ship, the commander of the EM was Senior Lieutenant Belyaev. And Gorshkov commanded the 7th naval brigade and was the senior chief when towing this EM from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Vladivostok.
          The Military Council of the Pacific Fleet on September 13 [1938] by order No. 0082 appointed a detachment for the transfer of ships, headed by the commander of the 7th naval brigade, captain of the 3rd rank Gorshkov and the military commissar of the detachment, senior political instructor Meshcheryakov

          It was 1938 in the yard. And just before the next VOSR holiday on November 8, Gorshkov managed to land the towed EM on stones without the possibility of removing it, having lost the first and only destroyer of the Pacific Fleet, etc. 7 at that time.
          In 1942, Gorshkov had been in the Black Sea Fleet for a long time (since 1939) and served in the Black Sea theater of operations until 1955.
          1. -1
            26 September 2021 18: 10
            I have not read the book offered for reading, but denies it. Free will. Tired of arguing.
            1. -1
              26 September 2021 19: 20
              No need to argue, no need to carry on all nonsense about submarines.
              1. 0
                27 September 2021 09: 35
                I didn't even say a word about submarines. Minus the answer.
                1. 0
                  27 September 2021 18: 13
                  At the same time, an unidentified submarine sank the destroyer "Resolute" - who is this, did I write? Do you have a split personality, don't you remember what you write?
                  1. 0
                    28 September 2021 15: 01
                    Quotes.
                    “And the caravan passed the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, passed the Soviet and Japanese minefields and on July 22 reached the First Kuril Strait, along which the border between Japan and the USSR passed. "And proceeded to the Pacific Ocean. It is believed that it was after this meeting that Japanese intelligence reported to Berlin about the redeployment of warships from the Pacific Ocean to Murmansk."
                    "The fact is that the Germans found out about the EON-18 and decided, if not to destroy it completely, then at least to shake it up. For this, the Nazis even organized Operation Wonderland. To destroy the EON-18, the Nazis sent a heavy cruiser to the Soviet northern latitudes. "Admiral Scheer" accompanied by two submarines. As a result, the Soviet icebreaker "A. Sibiryakov" was destroyed, therefore our leadership gave the order instructing the caravan to stay in Tiksi. "
                    So much for the submarines. But not Soviet, but Japanese or German. Although now there is a version that it was an American submarine. "
            2. -1
              28 September 2021 14: 02
              Quote: Boris Epstein
              I have not read the book offered for reading, but denies it.

              I do not deny this, but a special commission to investigate the death of the EM "Resolute" under the leadership of the commander of the Amur flotilla, the flagship of the 2nd rank Oktyabrsky.

              And if the EM "Resolute" was sunk in 1942, as you write about it:
              Quote: boris epstein
              In 1942, the transition of the destroyer division began (the leader of the destroyers "Baku", the destroyers "Resolute", "Reasonable", "Furious") made a round the world. At the same time, an unidentified submarine sank the destroyer Resolute.

              how he could have been commanded by Gorshkov, who at that time was serving on the Black Sea, about which he himself wrote.

              By the way, since when did the passage along the NSR from Vladivostok to Polyarny be considered around the world?
              Quote: Boris Epstein
              In 1942, the transition of the destroyer division began (the leader of the destroyers "Baku", the destroyers "Resolute", "Reasonable", "Furious") circumnavigated.
              1. 0
                28 September 2021 17: 28
                Damn, here's one overcame stupidity, and you repeat after him. Which one is "Decisive"? As part of EON-18 was "Zealous", which collided with the transport "Terney" and could not continue the journey.
  11. +1
    24 September 2021 17: 04
    To the madness of the brave we sing a song.
    1. +1
      24 September 2021 18: 31
      Quote: bandabas
      To the madness of the brave we sing a song.

      Yes. Song from "Seven Brave")
      1. +1
        24 September 2021 19: 29
        Rosenbaum, "Convoy Ship", is more suitable for the war in the Arctic.
        1. +1
          24 September 2021 19: 45
          Well, the song is not about the war, it's such a video sequence in the BG video. "Seven Bold" is all about the storming of the Arctic. For example, in Utyosov's version, the original words "Storm the distant sea" are replaced by "Drifting in the distant sea" - please, tell you about Chelyuskin))
          1. 0
            24 September 2021 20: 04
            this is a video sequence in the BG video
            Boris Borisych in the nineties became that still a horseman. And who of the musical leaders of our youth did not become one? Is that Shakhrin?
            1. +1
              24 September 2021 21: 04
              Quote: 3x3zsave
              Is that Shakhrin?

              Chizh)
              Well, I don't see anything opportunistic here, by the way. Bob has always been respectful of the war.
              1. -1
                24 September 2021 21: 13
                And what about Siskin? BBG long before his appearance on the scene harektirized such a phenomenon, "an aging youth in search of a high."
                1. -2
                  24 September 2021 22: 33
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  And what about Siskin?

                  Never mind. You yourself mentioned this ditty Shakhrin. For me this is a complete zero. Pre-rapper empty.
        2. +1
          24 September 2021 20: 13
          "We got there: it means that you proved everything by this" (c).

          It may well be a motto.
          1. +2
            24 September 2021 20: 32
            In the Arctic, water kills much earlier than the plague.
  12. 0
    25 September 2021 13: 00
    I'm wondering: these ships had at least heating in the interior, or the sailors were frozen there around the clock
  13. +1
    25 September 2021 17: 03
    Well, we mastered the wiring of destroyers from the First World War, and then the Komet raider was carried out.
    And back from the Pacific Fleet the leader of "Baku" in EON-18.
    It is a pity that during the Russian-Japanese 2nd Pacific there was no opportunity to hold it.
    It is a pity the abandoned military towns and airfields in the north in the 1990s. A lot of things are a pity ...