PRC Press: US Knows Better Not To Push China To War

19

The beginning of a war with China or Russia will be the end for the United States, and Washington is well aware of this, writes the author of an article for the Chinese edition of the Global Times. The Pentagon is increasingly advocating an end to the global confrontation.

In the United States, they began to understand that pushing China into war could end in a completely different way, as previously repeatedly stated in Washington. The risk of military confrontation between countries is only increasing, tensions in relations are increasing, but today's China is not at all what it was quite recently.



On Monday, the deputy chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General John E. Hayten, said that the main task of the US is to prevent a military clash with Russia and China. Okay, it would be a statement by a separate Pentagon representative, but another one immediately follows, though from a retired senior officer. As the retired admiral, commander of the Pacific fleet The US Navy, they tried to do everything to "prevent escalation and open military confrontation" with China.

The Pentagon began to understand that even an accidental shot could lead to a military clash, the newspaper notes. China is determined and does not intend to back down. Beijing will continue to promote the principle of "one China", not intending to retreat from it. There will be no "independent Taiwan" in the future; all US attempts to interfere in "China's internal affairs" will lead to a military clash.

Summing up, the Chinese author says that the words of the American military should be backed up by concrete actions. That is, the US Navy should not push China into war by interfering with China's actions in the South China Sea or other territories where the interests of the state are affected. Otherwise, any military conflict can develop into a nuclear one, which threatens the destruction of the whole world.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    19 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      21 September 2021 10: 59
      PRC Press: US Knows Better Not To Push China To War
      belay The whole world knows this. But it is better for China not to pull "death by the mustache" (Mowgli) feel
      1. +1
        21 September 2021 11: 01
        it's better not to pull "death by the mustache"

        And Tabaki by the tail? wink Otherwise, there are more and more doubts about which of the characters in the fairy tale actually resembles the United States? what
        1. -2
          21 September 2021 12: 41
          It's cooler here!
    2. +6
      21 September 2021 11: 03
      And if tomorrow is a war with China?
      What do we know about China?
      Slanted eyes like the Vietnamese
      And they don't really like us - foreigners.

      Maybe not? Vietnam passed.
      I remember - for something we were severely beaten there.
      In addition, barking will rise in the Senate -
      By God, we don't need this China ...
    3. 0
      21 September 2021 11: 07
      That is, the US Navy should not push China into war by interfering with China's actions in the South China Sea or other territories (and on the moon? fool ), Where interests of the state are affected.
      Somewhere it was already, and, it used to say the United States, when it was in force.
    4. +1
      21 September 2021 11: 08
      Incidents caused by the clash of interests of the United States and the PRC in the western part of the Pacific Ocean occur almost daily.
      ONLY the Yankes want to fight, BUT the hybrid method.
      Making their BEST efforts to destabilize China internally.
      1. +1
        21 September 2021 11: 32
        In our tree, neighbors swear at the whole village, throw apples, break the fence. But the hut is not fired. For the khan. And the United States will have small stinking conflicts ala Syria, economic wars, sanctions, redistribution of the foreign exchange market .... The enemy is always needed, the military budget (growth) is always needed, it is easier to keep the "small change" under the thumb and to snatch your weapon. In a couple of decades, the markets will be divided and talked about disarmament and spheres of influence will begin.
    5. +2
      21 September 2021 11: 11
      In the event of a conflict, who will supply the Americans with the Kivlavro thread for their body armor. laughing
      1. HAM
        0
        21 September 2021 11: 18
        The Chinese will also lather it so that it can be tightened more easily around the neck ..
    6. 0
      21 September 2021 11: 58
      The sun rises in the East and sets in the West.
      And there's nothing you can do about it.
      America is unable to reverse the rotation of the Earth.
    7. 0
      21 September 2021 12: 03
      PRC Press: US Knows Better Not To Push China To War
      To win a war in an easy one ... it's just the enemy / object to choose easier, but there will be NOTHING to take from him! and disagreeing now can be found, help the poor fellow !!! Sour option, no matter how you look at it.
    8. -2
      21 September 2021 12: 13
      The United States has a large number of ICBM aerospace interceptors. Therefore, they are not afraid of anyone. And when they want, then they will attack. If Russia had such technology, the US would never attack.
      1. 0
        22 September 2021 17: 22
        In America, there is no real thought of attacking Russia. It exists only in the Russian consciousness. American generals and politicians know that if America goes to war with Russia or China, it will end the America we know today. We have already gone bankrupt. Entering the war with a massive Russian or Chinese army would lead the United States to complete financial ruin. At best, we will be at the level of the third world countries. As many like to say, we "can" win the battle, but if the world's financial system collapses, it will be "losing the war." The American leadership is always trying to prevent a war with either Russia or China. We know this is a losing thing for our society.
    9. 0
      21 September 2021 12: 51
      The two countries depend on each other like a baby on a mother's milk. What kind of war? China does not know how to fight, the latest military experience of China is a confirmation. And the superiority in armament does not guarantee victory. China is vulnerable. Most of the military-industrial complex is located in the densely populated regions of the South. A few hits there and that's it, unlike the United States.
    10. +1
      21 September 2021 13: 56
      Starting a war with China or Russia will be the end for the United States
      One could put an end to this, but ... Well, some in the United States really want to, if not fight openly, then at least try to put two nuclear powers in a "stall". And this is again fraught with the United States, tk. there is not enough strength, and the authority is fading. So they rack their brains what to do.
    11. 0
      21 September 2021 14: 29
      This is a parade, just a regiment of tanks in the photo. tarpaulin containers 80 points in their place. wink
    12. 0
      21 September 2021 15: 16
      If there is a big naughty, I suppose that China will save the United States, because the US Armed Forces globally surpass China in almost all respects, both in missile defense and in strategic offensive arms. I think not a single Chinese missile will reach the US coast, but the Japanese and other American allies may suffer, but there may simply be nothing left of China.
    13. 0
      21 September 2021 19: 22
      Quote: Dartik
      The two countries depend on each other like a baby on a mother's milk. What kind of war? China does not know how to fight, the latest military experience of China is a confirmation. And the superiority in armament does not guarantee victory. China is vulnerable. Most of the military-industrial complex is located in the densely populated regions of the South. A few hits there and that's it, unlike the United States.


      Interesting, by the way, the opinion!
      I would add: purely geographically, the United States looks more secure in the military board.
      Or?
      The Chinese have rather foggy land neighbors. The rear of the Chinese are not of the "wrong system" ....
    14. for
      0
      22 September 2021 12: 12
      I don’t like throwing my hats, with Russia yes, but not with China.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"