Indian special forces units were deployed to the north of Kashmir in connection with data on possible penetration of militants

10

Additional units of the Indian army are being transferred to the area of ​​the city of Uri in Kashmir. The command notes that intelligence and border guards have identified "suspicious activity" along the contact line. Recall that the state of Jammu and Kashmir is territorially part of India, while separatist sentiments are strong in it. In addition, Pakistan is not ready to recognize the territory as completely Indian.

The Indian press reports that "there is a high probability of penetration of militants from the part of the region occupied by Pakistan into Jammu and Kashmir."



We will remind that earlier a number of Indian experts stated that "Pakistan can use the Taliban militants (* a terrorist group banned in the Russian Federation) to conduct sabotage activities in Kashmir." In particular, it was stated that the Taliban * allegedly promised from their part such "assistance" to Islamabad if he would help them with the capture of Panjshir. The Panjshir is now under Taliban control, and India believes that the likelihood of a Taliban * penetration into India has increased.

It is reported that the special forces are engaged in "combing the area in the Uri area in search of possible groups of militants who have infiltrated Pakistani territory."



Indian Special Forces Officer Commander of the Indian Army in northern Kashmir:

We are not letting our guard down. There was information about the probable penetration of militants from the adjacent territory. We do not yet know exactly what kind of militants we are talking about. But we are searching. Our task is to neutralize them in the near future if the crossing of the contact line has occurred.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    10 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      20 September 2021 08: 59
      What kind of creatures are we - people?
      What do we not live in the world?
      Wherever you do not stick hot or smoldering, big or small conflicts?
      Or maybe we have it clogged in the genetic code so that there is no overpopulation of the planet? what
      1. +3
        20 September 2021 09: 29
        Quote: Retvizan 8
        What kind of creatures are we - people?
        What do we not live in the world?
        Wherever you do not stick hot or smoldering, big or small conflicts?
        Or maybe we have it clogged in the genetic code so that there is no overpopulation of the planet? what

        When a conflict is involved in religion, one should not look for logic there.
        1. +1
          20 September 2021 09: 49
          Quote: APASUS
          Quote: Retvizan 8
          What kind of creatures are we - people?
          What do we not live in the world?
          Wherever you do not stick hot or smoldering, big or small conflicts?
          Or maybe we have it clogged in the genetic code so that there is no overpopulation of the planet? what

          When a conflict is involved in religion, one should not look for logic there.


          And yet there is some logic here. This is Pakistani politics. Pakistan is behind the Taliban.

          After the Taliban formed a government, the last doubts disappeared that this movement, which came to power in Afghanistan, is controlled from Pakistan. The government was formed only after the arrival in Kabul on September 4 of the head of Pakistan's ISI, Lieutenant General Faiz Hamid; in fact, it was formed by the head of Pakistani intelligence.




          Why Afghanistan to Pakistan is understandable. Pakistan is at enmity with India, and Afghanistan is turning into the deep rear of the Pakistani army, where you can hire tens of thousands of poorly trained, but brave and fanatical fighters for little money. Control over Afghanistan allows Islamabad to put pressure on unfriendly Iran, as well as to suppress any attempts by Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to play some role in the north of the country. Well, and in the long term - Afghan natural resources (oil, gas, lithium, lapis lazuli, emeralds, iron and copper), which will not at all interfere with the growth of the Pakistani economy. Plus super-cheap, albeit unskilled, labor force.




          The Taliban for the ISI is a consumable designed to ensure Pakistan's control over the backward Afghan tribes. And al-Qaeda is a kind of global special forces, striking where Pakistan needs it.

          What happened? The United States got involved in a 20-year war in Afghanistan, which a priori cannot be won. By the way, they left in Pakistan a huge part of the trillions spent on the war. And they "lost face" before the Muslim world. And Pakistan acquired it. And when the Americans nevertheless decided to leave Afghanistan, ISI with an iron fist returned the Taliban to their former positions - to establish in Afghanistan the order that Pakistan needs.

          Control over the Taliban and Afghanistan is important to Pakistan for another reason. The mountainous regions of Pakistan's Federal Tribal Areas are controlled by the local Taliban (Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan, CCI). This group appeared in 2007, after the Pakistani army tried to clean out the detachments of al-Qaeda, IS, Chechen, Uyghur, Uzbek extremists and uncontrolled Afghan Taliban, who retreated from Afghanistan under the blows of American troops. Local tribal groups refused to hand over their "brothers in the faith", declared themselves Pakistani Taliban and put up desperate resistance to the troops. A war ensued, which ended in a draw: some of the territories are still controlled by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry.





          Ideologically, the CCI differs from the Afghan Taliban only in its extreme "frostbite": it fights against Pakistan as a secular state, calls for the conquest and Islamization of India, threatens Myanmar and sends militants to Syria. The Chamber's relations with the Afghan Taliban are complicated: the Chamber of Commerce and Industry swore allegiance to the head of the Taliban, Mullah Omar, but refused to cooperate with Pakistan. The CCI units fought shoulder to shoulder with Afghan like-minded people against the Americans, and after the defeat of 2001 the Afghan Taliban sat out and gained strength under the wing of the CCI.

          American drones, Pakistani aviation and special forces have killed thousands of CCI militants and about 200 leaders, but have failed to either destroy or control the movement. The CCI detachments numbering 30-50 thousand militants and several hundred thousand militias still control large territories.


          Islamabad made so many efforts to take control of the Afghan Taliban because its unification with the CCI, close in all respects, would mean the creation of a huge Pashtunistan, which would become a threat to the very existence of Pakistan.




          Why does Pakistan need the Taliban and Afghanistan, mentioned above. Why global special forces in the person of al-Qaeda and IS?

          The strategic goal of Pakistan is the defeat and absorption of India, the transformation of the entire Hindustan into Pakistan. For this purpose, Pakistan fought four times with India. For her sake, Pakistan supports not only Islamist terrorist groups waging a war against India, but also Maoists - Naxalis fighting in the jungles of East India, Sikh, Assamese, Manipur and other separatists.




          All of the above does not mean that India is a country of peace-loving angels. Indians have been supporting the Balochi guerrilla movement for many years, terrorizing both Pakistani and Iranian parts of Baluchistan. India has also developed nuclear weapons, and is not behaving peacefully towards Pakistan. But this is a retaliatory aggressiveness: how else can India behave if Pakistan has openly threatened its very existence since its inception?

          Pakistan, which developed nuclear weapons in 1998, has a superpower ambition. It became the most powerful Muslim country, and Islamabad, long before their creation, called its nuclear weapons not Pakistani, but Islamic atomic bombs. In the opinion of a significant part of the Pakistani elite, it is their country that has the most reason to become the center of the Islamic world: it is the only one on the planet, deliberately created by Muslims who separated from the "infidels" (the rest of the Muslim states were created on a historical and national basis). Saudi Arabia, also claiming leadership, is ruled by a national dynasty that has no right to rule over other peoples; Egypt tried to play the role of the leader of the Arab and Muslim world under H.A. Nasser, but was repeatedly beaten by the most hated of enemies - Israel; Turkey is a nation-state, and huge Indonesia is a secular country, which is also much inferior to Pakistan in terms of development.

          After Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons, the West, and especially the United States, imposed tough sanctions against it. Moreover, after the collapse of the USSR, India, which was Moscow's ally, began to improve relations with the West, and - oh, horror for Pakistan! - with Israel. Pakistan's relations with the United States, very close until 1998, collapsed. China remained a strong ally of Islamabad, but this is a forced alliance: Pakistan does not want to depend on communist and non-Muslim China at all.



          https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5c2bb5cbea039800abdc8fd6/pakistan-kak-ugroza-6140ee024301173ee00e97a3
        2. 0
          20 September 2021 10: 06
          Quote: APASUS
          there is no need to look for logic there

          There is logic in that there is no logic laughing And the journalistic fiction sounds just ridiculous, they say we will help in Panjshir, and you will help us in Kashmir. And let us handle ourselves in Panjshir, and you yourself in Kashmir, where there are enough of your bandos laughing But to save on transfers, etc.
      2. 0
        20 September 2021 10: 32
        "States are like people. They are sick of statics." :)
        Well, yes, of course, genes. People are no different from animals in this respect.
        That they are squabbling over territory, that is, resources, that people are squabbling over the same thing.
        And why, in fact, should we stop and stop fighting? After all, others do not stop improving weapons, etc. So we need it too.
        And when someone reaches a significant advantage, such as the United States at 90-00 or we are over Ukraine in 2014, then why not do something by force?
    2. 0
      20 September 2021 09: 00
      Not otherwise, the Indian General Staff accidentally ate a Polish cow. Now they scare themselves and scare themselves. Explicit "cowaminus" of the brain with complications in the form of "Taliban are coming."
      The Taliban have a lot to do in Afghanistan. Why should they go to Kashmir. recourse
    3. +1
      20 September 2021 09: 08
      ***
      A nightmare in Kashmir ...
      ***
    4. +1
      20 September 2021 10: 02
      Some "experts" predict a local conflict over territorial claims between India and China. And here in India itself a possible conflict is brewing, in which Pakistan is involved. Waking up in the morning, you don't know where they started shooting today, they blew something up, and where possible the war began.
    5. 0
      20 September 2021 10: 07
      Pakistan is the planet's nuclear sore. Endless wars and coups d'état, confrontation with India, nests of countless gangs of terrorists of all stripes, their own Taliban, which is frostbitten much stronger than the Afghan and the very difficult terrain near the Afghan border - all this makes the Islamabad government very shaky and unpredictable.
      1. +1
        20 September 2021 11: 08
        All countries adjacent to Afghanistan in relation to the Taliban have chosen at least
        - unofficial contacts
        - officially neutral position
        - the conditions for the recognition of the new government of Afghanistan were announced both officially and unofficially.

        The Taliban also announced that their plans include peace and good neighborly relations. Fight against ISIS for destruction.

        India is like a black sheep throwing mud at the Taliban and Pakistan, at least in words for Massoud, against the Taliban in Panjshir, and in general against the Taliban.

        In Afghanistan, India can have very interesting large projects, mutually beneficial for both Afghanistan and India.

        It turns out that India is the only country in the region that immediately took a non-constructive position in relation to Afghanistan. Moreover, such a position in the future will most likely contradict the security interests in the region and run counter to the policies of such countries as Russia (and the CSTO and SCO), China, Pakistan, Iran. As well as the CSTO members and interested parties in a peaceful settlement in Afghanistan and major projects are Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan.

        Maybe India is somehow out of step and not all the others.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"