Press of India: Ishilovets who staged the terrorist attack in Kabul were released from Indian prison a year ago

The Indian press published material on the terrorist attacks in Kabul. Recall that as a result of attacks in late August in the capital of Afghanistan, about 200 Afghans and 13 US servicemen were killed. Responsibility was then assigned to ISIS (* a terrorist group banned in Russia), more precisely to one of its branches ISIS-K *.

India Today publishes material, which says that one of the terrorists who attacked Kabul airport a few weeks ago was a man named Abdurahman al-Logri. The Indian media drew attention to this terrorist due to the fact that in 2016 he was arrested by Indian law enforcement officers.

According to Indian reporters, al-Logri then arrived in New Delhi to stage an attack on police officers. According to him, he was going to do it "as a revenge for Kashmir." At the same time, the Indian special services received information that this person is a member of a terrorist group.

He was put on trial and spent several years in an Indian prison for preparing a terrorist attack. According to Indian journalists, al-Logri was deported to Afghanistan last year. There he committed a terrorist act at the end of August this year.

In this regard, there is a discussion of the question of whether the correctional system can "put on a normal path" a person who is a member of a terrorist conglomerate? As Indian practice has shown with regard to this al-Logri, no. The terrorist remained a terrorist. And even if some kind of "re-education" took place in the Indian colony, in Afghanistan al-Logri was again taken into circulation by the "network" structure of ISIS *.

Comments

[A. Privalov]

You can get the cat out of the trash heap, but the trash heap from the cat ...

[For example]

The Indian press published material on the terrorist attacks in Kabul.

Americans are invaders and invaders.
The Taliban are terrorists.

Why is an attack on invaders, occupiers and terrorists a terrorist attack?

Where is the line?
Does it exist?

The partisans who derailed fascist trains and blew up the Nazis in the theater were not terrorists.
They were heroes.

[Cheshire]

Quote: For example

Where is the line?
Does it exist?

It all depends on the point of view. On the one hand you are a terrorist, on the other you are a hero.

[A. Privalov]

Quote: For example

The Indian press published material on the terrorist attacks in Kabul.

Americans are invaders and invaders.
The Taliban are terrorists.

Why is an attack on invaders, occupiers and terrorists a terrorist attack?

Where is the line?
Does it exist?

The partisans who derailed fascist trains and blew up the Nazis in the theater were not terrorists.
They were heroes.

The difference is exactly the same as between a "vile spy" and a "valiant scout".

[Sanichsan]

Quote: For example

The Taliban are terrorists.

Tell me, what terrorist attacks were the Taliban committing? no, I'm aware that at the insistence of the United States they were recognized as terrorists, but I would like some facts. now the US wishlist is not enough ...
I looked in the tyrnete and did not find something.

[militarist63]

That's right! There was no such thing behind them!

[Seryoga64]

And even if some kind of "re-education" took place in the Indian colony,

Yes, there was no "re-education"
I rested and again for my own

[knn54]

Al-Logri was deported to Afghanistan last year.
... "So that in the future the rogues are both scary and dangerous -
So drown her in the river. "-" Excellent! "
Judges shout. On that everything was decided according to.
And they threw the Pike into the river! "(IA Krylov)

[For example]

The outcome of the trial was foreshadowed by the court and the prosecutor.

Krylov is a wise guy:

"The judges were gathering not far away;
They were grazing in their nearest meadow;
However, their names remained in the archive:

They were two Donkeys
Two old Nags, and two or three Goats;

For due well in the order of affairs of supervision
They were given a Fox for the Prosecutor. "

[rotfuks]

But we were strenuously pushed the version that it was an explosion in Kabul staged by a martyr. And so it turns out that it was not a martyr at all, if his identity was established. Someone in this story is lying big.

[rotfuks]

Judging by the video from those Kabul explosions, a lot of people were torn to pieces there and the remains lay in puddles of rainwater. And I strongly doubt that anyone there was collecting the remains and doing DNA tests to establish the identity of the Demoman. Moreover, according to the Taliban laws, all the dead are interred before sunset. In this regard, the statements that the identity of the demolitionist has been established looks like a self-PR of the Indian special services.

[militarist63]

Here, here ... and I thought about the same - WHAT IS THERE FROM HIM (dressed in a belt ..., from the detonation of which 200 people in the district were killed, and more than 1000 were injured and concussions of varying degrees ...) COULD BE AT ALL AT ALL FIND??!