Hong Kong Press: China, Russia, Pakistan and Iran have every chance of ending chaos in Afghanistan

The Hong Kong edition of SCMP comes out with material that talks about China's attempts to unite several countries in the cause of "solving the Afghan problem." We are talking, in particular, about the statements that the representatives of Beijing make at the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Recall that this organization includes countries such as the Russian Federation, China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Afghanistan is a de jure observer in the SCO.

The Hong Kong observer writes that the Chinese authorities intend to combine the efforts of China, Russia, Pakistan and Iran (for reference: Iran is an observer in the SCO) to achieve several goals.

First, a calm and stable Afghanistan without a Western military presence is extremely important for China. This, for example, is necessary for the implementation of the ambitious "One Belt - One Road" project, which was developed in China.
Secondly, as the aforementioned publication writes, it is important for China to "raise a fuss" about how the 20-year stay of the US and NATO troops in Afghanistan ended.

From the material:

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov say that a consolidation of efforts is needed to curb the chaos that Afghanistan has recently faced. They accuse Washington of destabilizing the situation in this country.

The Hong Kong edition notes that China, together with Russia, as well as major regional "players" - Pakistan and Iran - with whom there are rather warm relations, have every chance that the Afghan chaos will be ended.

Author at SCMP:

At the same time, China outlined its position to the leaders of the Taliban (* a terrorist group banned in Russia). This position is loyalty to the new Afghan authorities in exchange for the Taliban's refusal to carry out terrorist activities.

Comments

[Pashhenko Nikolay]

Better yet, China, Iran and Pakistan should unite without Russia. And let them put things in order in Afghanistan and take all the laurels for the order drivers for themselves.

[Maz]

the main thing is to do without the Americans

[Shurik70]

Quote: Pashhenko Nikolay

Better yet ... without Russia

1). Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan - these are all countries that are important for Russia, and they cannot be left "on their own". And Afghanistan borders on all of them. Order in Afghanistan is order on the border of these countries
2). Drugs to Russia mainly come from Afghanistan. It is useless to suppress the source with bombs (we tried, and not only us). So you can try to reduce the source by economic and diplomatic means. So that the Afghans themselves (some of them) are interested in this.
3). Although Afghanistan is now in ruins, there are large natural reserves of minerals. Whoever puts things in order in Afghanistan will participate in their development.

[ximkim]

It's time for Lavrov to retire, as the Foreign Ministry could become a full house ..

[Flooding]

Quote: ximkim

It's time for Lavrov to retire, as the Foreign Ministry could become a full house ..

Lavrov probably provided himself with a comfortable life in retirement.
And who will you read to replace him?

[Civil]

In the People's Republic of China and its satellites, it is correct to write.

[ximkim]

Quote: Flood

Quote: ximkim

It's time for Lavrov to retire, as the Foreign Ministry could become a full house ..

Lavrov probably provided himself with a comfortable life in retirement.
And who will you read to replace him?

He has an employer, and he must read and renew the blood.
But the president is not even eager to rejuvenate this body ..

[Flooding]

Quote: ximkim

But the president is not even eager to rejuvenate this body.

Do you trust this question to the commander-in-chief?
correct answer

[evgen1221]

Here is just a small question, and the West does not want to babble
or toss technologies with nishtyaks to these countries for the fact that they will rake his poop in aughanistan.?

[rocket757]

Hong Kong Press: China, Russia, Pakistan and Iran have every chance of ending chaos in Afghanistan

... You can do it, with the proper skill, BUT, it's very expensive, this time. There will be those who will shit, these are two.
And thirdly, DO WE NEED IT? to such an extent to get in there, we have our own concern, to drive the neighbors into the stall, so that they would not do drugs !!! it is there and a lot!

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: rocket757

And thirdly, DO WE NEED IT? to such an extent to get in there, we have our own concern, to drive the neighbors into the stall, so that they would not do drugs !!!

1. There is no need to refuse any cooperation within the SCO, just first you need to decide on the status of the organization that has taken power in Afghanistan.
2. The degree of "getting involved" in Afghan affairs depends only on the degree of the benefits derived from this (at least in the conditions of today's Russian economy).
3. You should not drive your neighbors into a stall, but prove to them that it is more profitable to be friends with Russia than to bark at it. And this principle is easiest to prove by creating a union state with Belarus, disregarding the interests of the oligarchs and guided by the interests of the state.
4. I can give you examples of a successful fight against drug trafficking on the principle: "no demand - no supply." Forgive me, but no one should replace the competence of the FSB and RTU with friendship with neighbors.
It remains to decide WHAT WE NEED IN REALITY.

[rocket757]

Quote: ROSS 42

WHAT WE NEED IN REALITY

Even this question is more complicated than ... WHO EXACTLY AND WHAT IS NECESSARY?
Each question brings with it a bunch of questions and clarifications.
As I say, one glass is not enough.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: rocket757

As I say, one glass is not enough.

[gorenina91]

- Ha, China has already firmly established itself in Afghanistan ... - And now China under this "Chinese auspices" can easily organize a kind of "coalition alliance" loyal to it; the participants of which will drag chestnuts out of the fire for him (China) with their own hands ... - how is it all "c'est tres jolie" (this is very nice) ... - Ie. members of this coalition will maintain order in Afghanistan; supply him with medicines and humanitarian aid; to supply food, fuel and lubricants and in every possible way to help maintain a certain favorable standard of living for the population of Afghanistan ... - And China will lead and "skim the cream" from everything that will be created by this .., led and led by it coalition ... - "un seul participant pourra profiter de tout cela" (only one participant can take advantage of all this) ... - Like this ...

[aszzz888]

The Hong Kong observer writes that the Chinese authorities intend to join the efforts of China, Russia, Pakistan and Iran (for reference: Iran is an observer in the SCO)

Consider already a member of the SCO.

DUSHANBE, 17 Sep - Sputnik. Iran will become a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. This decision was made during the anniversary SCO summit in Dushanbe.

[p0pulivox]

You can assume anything, but such a probability is quite high - thanks to its economic potential and sensible, pragmatic leadership, the PRC will play the greatest role (and will benefit).
The Russian Federation is likely to be on the second, third roles ...