In the United States is testing a new anti-tank mine XM204 the size of a suitcase

29

Despite numerous innovations in the field of unmanned systems, robots, artificial intelligence, infantry still plays a very important role in combat, especially in local conflicts. The US military is pursuing a plan to build a massive suitcase-sized anti-tank mine that is actually a four-submunition launcher. With the help of such a mine, dismounted units could prevent the offensive tanks.

Such a solution may be relevant in local military conflicts, as well as in conflicts in those countries that do not have a significant tank and artillery arsenal, but they need to hold out until the main forces of the allies arrive. At the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona, the first trials of the XM204 large-area impact ammunition were carried out.



US Army spokesman Lt. Col. Isaac Cuthbertson stressed that the proposal to develop this weapons (ammunition) came from the American command in Europe. It is clear that in Europe, if any tanks are feared, it is exclusively Russian. The new XM204 anti-tank ammunition is designed to deter enemy tanks and other tracked vehicles.

After manually installing the XM204, specialists leave the area where the ammunition is located, leaving the monitoring sensors. Surveillance systems then report that the XM204 Top Attack fired submunitions that hit enemy vehicles, inflicting significant damage and forcing the enemy to change the direction of movement of their troops.

This approach allows you to gain time in the event of a collision with an approaching stronger enemy with armored vehicles. As noted, for the United States, the use of such ammunition in the Baltic States, whose countries are not able to independently repulse the attack of Russian tanks in the event of an armed conflict, will be very relevant.

As noted by one of the American servicemen who participated in the test of the mine, she "hears" the approach of enemy tracked vehicles and begins to track them. When tracked vehicles approach a certain distance, the XM204 fires submunitions at the target.

The camera's aim point gives us an idea of ​​where the ammunition will hit if it fires.

- emphasizes Lt. Col. Cuthbertson.

Also, the US military noted that during the tests of large mines, remote-controlled cars were used. This made it possible to study with the greatest accuracy the features of the action of the new ammunition in conditions close to the situation of a real battle.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    17 September 2021 12: 25
    What are small things, under the Warsaw Pact, nuclear bombs were buried on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany in the expected places of the offensive of our tanks! And for some reason we knew about them, with an accuracy not up to a meter, of course.
    1. 0
      17 September 2021 13: 08
      If I'm not mistaken, then the SA, for sure, also left a little something ... just in case! A couple of years ago, after all, they accidentally discovered a mothballed radio station on the territory of some park in Germany, and even in a recent performance ...
      1. +1
        17 September 2021 13: 11
        Even the Germans missed such a scandal, I hesitate but I'll see.
      2. -1
        17 September 2021 16: 05
        How can the CA leave a mothballed radio station in "some park", and even in a RECENT version? How is your logic, are you friends?
        1. -1
          17 September 2021 17: 54
          Did I write that the radio remained from the SA?
          1. -1
            18 September 2021 10: 24
            "If I'm not mistaken, then the SA, for sure, also left something a little ... and further in the text. Or is it just me who see it?"
            1. 0
              18 September 2021 11: 18
              It is possible that on the territory of the GDR, somewhere, in the wells, there are still so-called "atomic" mines with a remote fuse, which are already under 40 years old and the equipment there is also outdated, that's what I meant ... but the Lord's ways not confessable, and the history of secret operations is generally in the dark. And a walkie-talkie is needed to press a button ...
              1. -1
                18 September 2021 13: 50
                It already looks like a "high - like".
                1. -1
                  18 September 2021 14: 57
                  Your expression means: "a high probability of an event!", Which came into use after the poisoning of the Skripals, since the Naglasaks did not have direct evidence, and there was a lot of fantasy and a desire to accuse Russia. So, take it on faith or look for available information. My personal translation: IN THIS WORLD EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE!
                  1. 0
                    19 September 2021 11: 09
                    Literally - very likely. Otherwise, you make the right conclusion, your imagination.
  2. +3
    17 September 2021 12: 26
    The development is interesting and unpleasant. These mines do not need to be located directly next to the tank. The defeat occurs at a distance of up to several tens of meters. Remotely controlled.
    The principle of operation for an example of an old development:
    1. +2
      17 September 2021 15: 16
      And we will answer them too! angry
      1. +1
        17 September 2021 15: 40
        PS Eh. not at the beginning uploaded! I wanted this!
    2. 0
      17 September 2021 21: 47
      Pvm, tm83, hunting.
  3. -4
    17 September 2021 12: 42
    In the United States is testing a new anti-tank mine XM204 the size of a suitcase

    ***
    Troops of porter miners will appear ...
    ***
    1. -4
      17 September 2021 13: 29
      And the train station suitcase thieves? Romanians can get ahead here.
    2. -1
      17 September 2021 14: 13
      Rather, self-propelled imitators-rumblers will appear on our side.
      Too much something in DARPA malacholny!
  4. -1
    17 September 2021 12: 44
    "Suitcase", railway station, Baltics. laughing
  5. -1
    17 September 2021 13: 08
    I didn’t graduate from the NATO academies, so I don’t understand why we need to join the tri-Baltic. They don’t shoot through and through, the sea is not mined, airfields are not bombed. We need a corridor with Kaliningrad on a short section.
    1. 0
      17 September 2021 14: 16
      WW2 started over another corridor.
      1. -3
        17 September 2021 14: 28
        They will force them to hand them over and the railway line will be extended with the Autobahn. Russia is not Poland.
  6. -3
    17 September 2021 13: 52
    Such a solution may be relevant in local military conflicts, as well as in conflicts in those countries that do not have a significant tank and artillery arsenal, but they need to hold out until the main forces of the allies arrive.

    Was this "baggage" born from the failed NATO tank exercises in the Baltic countries? Well, this is at least a weapon of defense. Let it be buried if the earth is extra. Our tanks won't go there anyway, unless in their cowardly dreams.
  7. -2
    17 September 2021 13: 54
    It seems like these pribluds should activate the new anti-mine systems of the Russian Federation, don't they?
  8. -1
    17 September 2021 13: 55
    They're not hiding the mininucleus there? Against the tank, a torn gusl and he does not live long, in general, and ordinary enough for the eyes. And in order to send a tank 100% to the moon with each mine, it is necessary to set an overdofig and generally redundant. If the submunition is in the side of the guslu mto and the roof, then it is also redundant, even against the Papuans on Renault ft 17.
  9. +3
    17 September 2021 14: 29
    Yes, a good thing for partisan mining defile of lakes, intersections, bridges and crossings. On the principle of "set and leave". If it didn't work, - came - took off and carried away. The engineering support of the columns will get tired - it is necessary to check the lane of 100 meters in each direction, this is not a landmine on the side of the road. 2 suitcases (8 submines) are quite capable of spoiling the column. Having a "friend or foe" receiver, you can receive new codes from the center and codes from equipment (well, let it beep for 200 meters) ...
  10. 0
    17 September 2021 14: 50
    After manually installing the XM204, specialists leave the area where the ammunition is located, leaving the monitoring sensors. Surveillance systems then report that the XM204 Top Attack fired submunitions that hit enemy vehicles, inflicting significant damage and forcing the enemy to change the direction of movement of their troops.
    And what about "Serpent Gorynych", "Krasukha-4"? After their use, this suitcase is unlikely to remain combat-ready. And the sensors will not be able to transmit anything if their signal is suppressed or substituted
    1. 0
      18 September 2021 01: 21
      If the sensors are connected with wires or optics, they spat on the electronic warfare from a high bell tower
  11. +1
    17 September 2021 23: 12
    Quote "With the help of such a mine, dismounted units could hinder the advance of tanks." As a result, protection from AFVs is obtained after the use or absence of ATGM / RG in infantry units is, in principle, cheap and cheerful. Like Claymore or MON against infantry, it certainly won't be superfluous. Well done.
  12. +1
    18 September 2021 08: 21
    The effectiveness of this mine will be higher if it is installed on a small robot.