A. I. Solzhenitsyn. Inarticulate graphomaniac with a "speaking" surname
On October 8, 2016, an event took place in Moscow, which almost all mass media of "free" Russia cowardly kept silent about. At the gates of the Moscow Museum of the History of the Gulag, two young activists of the RKSM (b) hanged a scarecrow of Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Attached to the scarecrow was a plaque with an inscription in which Solzhenitsyn was called “primary enemy","who lied to us about the Gulag", And it was claimed that he"sneered at the truth". In 2015, a plaque with the words "Traitor" was hung on the monument to Solzhenitsyn in Vladivostok.
In December 2018, Putin inaugurated a monument to Solzhenitsyn in Moscow. On Solzhenitsyn Street, into which in 2008 the Bolshaya Kommunisticheskaya was renamed in violation of the law: at that time, less than 10 years had passed since the date of his death. Two days later, a plaque with the inscription "Judas" appeared on this sculpture, and a police squad was placed near the monument. In June 2019, 4 letters were rubbed to shine on the pedestal of this monument, so that the word "liar" began to stand out.
These incidents, which the Russian authorities are trying not to advertise and "not notice", are indicators that the people are tired of the incomprehensible hypocrisy of the current rulers of Russia. Who speak beautiful and correct words, but at the same time open all kinds of "Yeltsin-centers", finance the "Gaidar Forums" and include in the school curriculum the completely false works of a talentless graphomaniac declared a "great writer" and almost a "classic of Russian literature." The same one who wrote about the Great Patriotic War in his multi-page libel "The Gulag Archipelago":
“The Germans were humane not only towards prisoners of war. They brought great benefits to the entire population in the occupied regions. The Germans, firstly, amazed the population with their courtesy and gallantry. Secondly, someone annoyingly repeats that on the occupied land they set up extermination camps, opened crematoria and the like - this is nonsense, in fact they were opening something completely different ... The Germans came and began to open churches. Thirdly, the Germans created conditions for the realization of their peculiar abilities and ambitious hopes for some energetic and active people languishing in obscurity. "
Look at a photo of one of these "energetic" people:
This is the former policeman Alex Lyuty (Yukhnovsky Alexander Ivanovich). In Kadievka (Stakhanov, Luhansk Oblast), he realized his “peculiar abilities” by personally dumping local residents suspected of having links with partisans into mine pits. After the war, he was hiding under the name of Mironenko. Was identified by accidentally surviving Vera Kravets, who at the time of the "execution" was 12 years old.
And how do you like this pearl of Alexander Isaich:
“So what if the Germans won? There was a portrait with a mustache; they would hang with a mustache. Everything and business! "
I forgot to add: "and would drink Bavarian beer."
Well, Stalingrad, according to Solzhenitsyn, was defended, of course, by penal battalions and companies, which this forger called “cement the foundation of the Stalingrad victory».
Marshal V.I. Chuikov, one of the main characters of Stalingrad, wrote with indignation:
“How could you, Solzhenitsyn, come to such blasphemy in order to slander those who stood to death and defeated death ?! ... You, Solzhenitsyn, dared to scoff at these heroes, pouring out streams of lies and filth on them. I repeat again: during the Stalingrad epic, there were no penal companies or other penal units in the Soviet Army. Among the Stalingrad fighters there was not a single penalty box fighter. On behalf of the Stalingrad people who were alive and died in battle, on behalf of their fathers and mothers, wives and children, I accuse you, A. Solzhenitsyn, as a dishonorable liar and a slanderer against the heroes of Stalingrad, against our army and our people. "
Literary Vlasov
The Archipelago also contains the following lines:
“The camp for Soviet prisoners of war near Kharkov was a very well-fed camp, among the commandants of the camps there were downright humane patrons, for example, our soldier, who was a pianist by his pre-war profession, was captured, and what? In captivity, a German major, the commandant of the camp, took pity on him - he helped him start giving concerts. "
Have you spattered with oil yet? Tears of affection did not flow?
By the way, the well-known traitor A. Vlasov wrote about the same in his Manifesto of April 12, 1943, addressing the Red Army men:
“False propaganda seeks to intimidate you with the horrors of the German camps and executions. Millions of prisoners can confirm the opposite. "
So it was quite rightly called in the USSR Solzhenitsyn “literary Vlasov».
Hero of the Soviet Union Vladimir Karpov wrote to Solzhenitsyn:
“Yes, there were traitors in the war. Cowardice, the insignificance of their souls, pushed them into a dirty deed. But there are traitors in peacetime too - it's you, Sakharov and Solzhenitsyn! Today you are shooting your compatriots in the back. "
Solzhenitsyn's widow, N. Svetlova, even in 2010 showed adherence to principles, announcing on September 10 at the presentation of the first batch of the school edition of the Archipelago:
“The material about the heroes of Russia - the Vlasovites has been removed from the book. It takes several decades for the people of Russia to come to the understanding that they were real patriots of their country. "
I really hope that we will never see such “patriots of Russia”.
A graphomaniac declared to be a great writer
At the same time, all these, if I may say so, Solzhenitsyn's opuses are written in an absolutely terrible, sloppy, incredibly heavy syllable, his language is archaic and smelled of mothballs. For me personally, reading his books literally “scratches my brain”. Therefore, now, in the process of working on this article, I simply grit my teeth, being forced to turn again to the clumsy lines of the works of this incompetent graphomaniac.
Former US Ambassador to the USSR D. Beam also wrote about Solzhenitsyn's lack of the slightest literary talent:
“The first versions of his manuscripts were a voluminous, long-winded raw mass that needed to be organized into an intelligible whole ... they abounded with vulgarisms and incomprehensible places. They needed to be edited, and we assigned the appropriate people from the special services to this very important case for us. "
The Russian émigré, writer and literary critic NI Ulyanov noticed this work of American "literary blacks". He writes in the newspaper "New Russian Word" (August 1, 1971):
“Solzhenitsyn's works are not written with one pen. They bear the traces of the works of many people of different writing tastes and backgrounds, different intellectual levels and different specialties. "
The same picture, by the way, is observed in the case of Viktor Rezun, who brazenly appropriated the pseudonym "Suvorov": anti-Soviet opuses published on his behalf were written by different people, it is simply striking and visible to the naked eye.
And here is how the same "Gulag Archipelago" Karel Yezdinsky, an employee of the Czechoslovak edition of the radio station "Free Europe", assessed:
"Literary nonsense of the first category, but anti-communist directed, and therefore valuable."
As the philosopher, writer and publicist A. Zinoviev once said (deprived of Soviet citizenship in 1978 and revised his views after the collapse of the USSR):
"They were aiming for communism, but ended up in Russia."
Now tell me, do not the lines of the government telegram sent to his widow in 2008 on the occasion of Solzhenitsyn's death seem to you mocking?
“The whole life of Alexander Isaevich was given to the Fatherland. He served him as a true citizen and patriot, and with all his heart he was rooting for the fate of the Russian people, for the just order of the country. "
"A simple Soviet prisoner, his comrade is the Bryansk gray wolf"
The circumstances of Solzhenitsyn's arrest are mysterious and incomprehensible. Out of the blue, he suddenly writes a number of letters from the front in which he openly insults the Supreme Commander-in-Chief (Stalin), informs about plans to found an underground organization "Society of True Leninists", invites his correspondents to organize themselves into conspiratorial "fives". Is he an idiot? Doesn't he know that all letters from the front (in all armies, not only in the Soviet one) are being checked out? He knows very well. And he understands that any counterintelligence, even Soviet, even Polish, even British (and so on), will come for the author of such a letter. So he wants to be arrested? And why?
The point is probably that they decided to transfer Solzhenitsyn to the front line. Yes, you heard right: the "frontline artilleryman" Solzhenitsyn actually fought in the rear - in the position of commander of a sound reconnaissance battery. That is, it was about 3-5 kilometers from the front line and tried to determine their coordinates by the sound of enemy guns. Childhood friends - K. Simonyan and L. Yezherets called Solzhenitsyn the most cowardly person of all whom they saw. And they put forward a version of "moral self-shooting."
When Solzhenitsyn found out that right now, at the very end of the war, he might have to actually shoot at the German tanks, he may have just decided to "sit out with the special officers." This, by the way, suggests that the Red Army men were not too afraid of these very special officers. Solzhenitsyn himself later admitted that the real condemnation came as an unpleasant surprise to him: he believed that he would not be jailed for such "nonsense" - after all, there was no information constituting a state secret in his letters. But, thanks to "cooperation with the investigation," he received a relatively mild sentence: 8 years in camps without confiscation of property. At the same time, he was released already in 1952.
The investigation into the Solzhenitsyn case lasted only 9 days. During this time, he wrote denunciations of his friends, acquaintances, and even his wife, who, not knowing about it, carried him parcels to the Lubyanka and Butyrka prison.
The Czechoslovak journalist Rzezac Tomas in his book "The Spiral of Treason of Solzhenitsyn" tells about a conversation that he had with an investigator who was in charge of the case of the future Nobel laureate. He said that Solzhenitsyn belonged to the type of "soft-bodied" persons under investigation,
“Which are given directly into your hands. In addition to the truth, they also expound their conjectures, just to thank you ... For me it was simply incredible - how you can slander the closest people like that! "
Nikolai Vitkevich, a childhood friend of Solzhenitsyn (he cut his fingers with a knife and swore in friendship on blood), was sentenced to 10 years on his denunciation. He was amazed when the investigator gave him the testimony of a former "friend" to read:
“When, in the process of rehabilitation, they showed me Solzhenitsyn's denunciation, it was the most terrible day in my life ... government, the evil ink of Stalin ... I could not believe my eyes ... And imagine! - they contained denunciations about his wife Natalia Reshetovskaya, and about our friends Shurik Kagan and Lydia Ezherets. K. Simonyan also miraculously escaped arrest. "
Childhood friends: Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Kirill Simonyan, Natalya Reshetovskaya (Solzhenitsyn's first wife), Nikolai Vitkevich, Lydia Ezherets
KS Simonyan, a famous surgeon, professor, doctor in charge of Academician Landau, recalled the summons to the state security investigator in 1952. He asked him to give explanations on Solzhenitsyn's denunciation:
“I began to read and felt the hair on my head begin to move ... These fifty-two pages described the history of my family, our friendships at school and beyond. At the same time, on each page it was proved that from childhood I was allegedly anti-Soviet, spiritually and politically corrupting my friends and especially Sanya Solzhenitsyn, incited him to anti-Stalinist activity. "
At the end of the conversation, Simonyan asked the investigator:
"Tell me, why did Solzhenitsyn do this just before the end of his sentence?"
The answer was as follows:
«He's just a trash man. "
And who inspires sympathy here? The cowardly "fighter against the regime" AI Solzhenitsyn, who slandered his wife and friends? Or a "bloody Chekist" who quickly figured out this matter and released the unjustly slandered surgeon?
It is not surprising that Simonyan later spoke very impartially about this dissident. And Solzhenitsyn answered him with hypocritical regret in the Gulag Archipelago:
“Oh, it’s a pity you weren’t jailed then! How much have you lost! "
No comments. There are no words.
In the future, Solzhenitsyn will demonstrate his cowardice more than once. By his own admission, he was recruited into "snitches" and received the pseudonym "Vetrov". Innocently explains to readers:
“It's scary how: winter, blizzards and going to the Arctic. And here I am settled, sleep dry, warm and even linen. In Moscow, my wife comes to see me, carries programs ... Where to go, why go, if you can stay? "
In one of his letters, Solzhenitsyn reports on the conditions of detention in the central political prison:
“Ah, what a sweet life! Chess, books, box-spring beds, down pillows, solid mattresses, shiny linoleum, clean linen. I had forgotten long ago that I also slept like this before the war. Shabby parquet floor. Almost four steps can be taken in a walk from window to door. No, seriously, this central political prison is a real resort. And here grenades do not burst, guns do not rumble. "
The version of Solzhenitsyn's "moral self-shooting" put forward by K. Simonyan and L. Yezherets is confirmed.
But how well Aleksandr Isaevich settled down in the “terrible gulag” then: he sleeps warmly and dryly, he is provided with linen, plays chess, reads books. And the wife slandered by him regularly carries parcels. And in "Sharashka Marfino" - in addition to rations, a pound of white bread every day and butter in addition, any books from the Lenin library, playing volleyball, free use of the radio, work in the specialty in an acoustic laboratory. The prisoner Solzhenitsyn relaxed and became so impudent that he began to be rude to his superiors. Therefore, they sent him to the Ekibastuz camp, where he did not live in poverty either: having offered the services of an informer to the administration, he first received the position of a foreman, and then became a librarian.
Lev Nikolayevich Gumilev wrote the book "Hunnu" in the library of the Karaganda camp, and while in the hospital of the Omsk camp - the work "Ancient Turks", on the basis of which he later defended his doctoral dissertation. Librarian Solzhenitsyn collected rumors and gossip. For example, such:
“They say (again someone tells him!) That in December 1928 on Krasnaya Gorka (Karelia) the prisoners were left to spend the night in the forest as punishment (they did not complete the lesson) and 150 people froze to death. This is an ordinary Solovetsky technique, you will not doubt it. "
Do you need to comment on this bike? Or is everything clear? If the guards had missed at least one person in the morning, everyone would have gone to court. This is what, really, you will not doubt.
But our pseudo-classic continues to rave:
"On the Kem-Ukhtinsky tract near the town of Kut, in February 1929, a company of prisoners, about 100 people, were driven to the fire for failure to comply with the norm, and they were burned."
Fear of open fire is an unconditional instinct, and it is impossible to get around it. Once in front of a wall of flame, people forget even about the fear of heights and jump from balconies or roofs of multi-storey buildings.
Do you feel the difference between the two camp librarians: Gumilev and Solzhenitsyn?
I must say that among real prisoners Solzhenitsyn's tales caused two reactions: one half - laughter, the other - anger with obscenities. Varlam Shalamov, for example, belonged to the second category. And he wrote:
"I consider Solzhenitsyn to be a person who is not worthy to touch on such an issue as Kolyma."
Only Russian liberal intellectuals (sincerely, out of stupidity) and foreign curators (on duty) trusted Solzhenitsyn.
But the informer Solzhenitsyn-Vetrov did one good deed in the Ekibastuz camp: he informed the leadership about the preparation of the uprising of Western Ukrainian nationalists. True, for selfish reasons: I learned that the first thing the Bandera men would do with the informers identified. So he wrote at the end of his denunciation:
“I would like to remind you once again regarding my request to protect me from the reprisals of criminals who have recently been pestering me with suspicious inquiries.
Winds
20.1.52. "
Winds
20.1.52. "
Pay attention to the date? 1952, in which Solzhenitsyn was released early from prison. The Gulag appreciated his efforts. At first, they were carefully placed in the infirmary so that other prisoners would not strangle or stab at night, then they were transferred to another camp, and from there almost immediately - "to freedom with a clear conscience."
After "many years of continuous suffering" in the camps, Solzhenitsyn lived for 89 years. And most of the real front-line soldiers did not live to see 70.
During my school years, I still managed to listen to the stories of real front-line soldiers who survived all these terrible years. These were my relatives, their friends and acquaintances, neighbors. And do you know what caught my eye? They knew nothing about the "Stalinist repressions"! Can you imagine that? At night, it means that "funnels" drive around, "Stalin's satraps" grab people indiscriminately, and colleagues, relatives, neighbors of these "innocent victims" do not notice anything?
During family holidays, after drinking, the front-line soldiers sometimes recalled Khrushchev's notorious report. From these stories it followed that the reaction of society to Khrushchev's fabrications was shock. People did not know that, it turns out, all these years they lived in a "police state" in which "half of the population sat, half - guarded." One of these old men, in a fit of frankness, said that he then went to the district committee and threw his party card in the face of the first secretary. Explaining that he was doing this because Khrushchev, as it were, to put it mildly, "slandered the Party." The secretary remained silent (apparently, he completely agreed with him) and no organizational conclusions, and even more so no repressions followed: they were not fired from work, they were not removed from the queue for an apartment, vouchers to the sanatorium were given every year, and so on.
By the way, during my entire life I saw only one person, whose parents were exiled under Stalin - in the 90s he was given benefits, and he "went king." At the same time, the people who knew him whispered that his grandfather was a real fist and a world eater.
"The book that deceived the whole world"
Many dissidents (both in Russia and abroad) at first did not accept the Gulag Archipelago and considered this book harmful to their movement. The reason was the monstrous falsifications and fabrications, which, it seemed, could not be believed by any person. Alas, they believed it, albeit for a while. But now the second and almost official name of this dirty libel on the USSR is "The Book That Deceived the Whole World."
Solzhenitsyn did not have access to archives and documents. He collected gossip, rumors, camp folklore. Information about "Pecherlag", for example, he received "accidentally from a prisoner who had access to them at that time". "Super reliable" source, isn't it?
But I also added a lot on my own. As a result, Varlam Shalamov, who at first told Solzhenitsyn a lot about his life in the camps, sharply changed his attitude towards him and gave the following order:
"I forbid the writer Solzhenitsyn and everyone who has the same thoughts with him to get acquainted with my archive."
Solzhenitsyn publicly called on US presidents to put pressure on the USSR and the socialist countries. And Varlam Shalamov wrote:
"Both the West and America do not care about our problems, and the West does not solve them."
Do you feel the difference between a decent person and a traitor?
But what about Solzhenitsyn's facts and figures?
After the release of Archipelago, the leaders of the Central Archive, through the magazine Knowledge to the People, mockingly turned to Solzhenitsyn:
“Come to Moscow. The documents are waiting for you. "
Naturally, there was no answer.
In 1941, according to Solzhenitsyn, “we had 15 millionth camps».
In the same second volume of The Archipelago, he writes:
"The victims of the Stalinist repressions were 66,7 million people."
And in an interview that Solzhenitsyn gave in 1976 on Spanish television, he, apparently forgetting about this figure, already speaks of 110 million "victims of socialism." In the same interview, he praised the recently deceased dictator Franco and warned the Spaniards against democratic change.
By the way, Joseph Goebbels, for all his shameless impudence, spoke of only 14 million repressed in the USSR. Poor dilettante! How far is he from our "Judas" Alexander Isaevich!
Meanwhile, the commission for the rehabilitation of victims of political repression, created during the years of Perestroika by a member of the Gorbachev Politburo Yakovlev, has determined the exact numbers. It turned out that during the entire existence of Soviet power, from 1919 to 1990, 3 786 094 people were convicted under political articles, of which 642 980 people were shot. Moreover, 90% of these arrests and executions fell on two years - 1937 and 1938. At the time, the NKVD was headed by the pederast Nikolai Yezhov, suffering from an inferiority complex. The dwarf's head was spinning from the power that fell on him. To get rid of him, he had to call in Moscow a man who least of all wanted to work in the NKVD system and dreamed of a career as an engineer and builder. And his name was Lavrenty Beria.
By the way, the famous 58th article had 14 points. Only three of them were "political" (like "counter-revolutionary agitation"). The rest are espionage, terrorism, banditry, and so on. So not all those convicted under this article "suffered for jokes."
Despite all efforts, only about 800 thousand people managed to rehabilitate Yakovlev's commission: the rest (almost three million) were justly convicted and no grounds for rehabilitation were found.
At the time of Stalin's death, in March 1953, there were 2 people in prisons and camps. Political - 526 402 (221%). Many of them at that time were SS men from the Baltic states and Western Ukraine, Vlasovites and policemen. In addition, their ranks were constantly replenished with animal-like "green brothers" from the Baltic states (the plot lines of the famous film "Nobody Wanted to Die", even in Lithuania, no one disputed) and natural-born sadistic Bandera from Western Ukraine. There were 435 8,76 people convicted of espionage among the "political" people, 9 617 for terror, 8 893 for sabotage. There were 3 780 convicted nationalists.
Bandera, "green brothers", former policemen, as a rule, received six years of exile (just!). And only if there was one hundred percent evidence of their participation in war crimes and massacres of civilians, they were sentenced to 10 years in camps. Here they were waited for by a fully paid nine-hour working day, a work book, a full social package and, it is not clear from what fright, the Khrushchev amnesty for the tenth anniversary of Victory in 1955. More than 20 OUN members then returned to Western Ukraine alone.
Yu Nersesov wrote:
“Solzhenitsyn ... lied constantly. According to the certificate "Information about the evicted kulaks in 1930-1931", prepared by the department for special settlers of the Main Directorate of the camps, not 15 million were exiled, but 1 803 392 people (including the wives and children of the exiled) ... from Germany prisoners of war and civilians. Of the 4 Soviet citizens repatriated from Germany in 199-488, only 1945 people were arrested ... But 1946 people, that is, most of those who were officially convicted of serving in the pro-Hitler armed formations or civilian the occupation administration, received 272 years of exile. The same verdict was passed on 687 servicemen of the collaborationist units captured by the American-British allies and repatriated to the USSR on November 148, 079. And of the 6 Soviet prisoners of war released in 9-907, only 6 people were arrested and another 1944 were sent to penal units. "
Another monstrous lie of Solzhenitsyn is the statement about mass repressions in Leningrad:
“It is believed that a quarter of Leningrad was cleared in 1934-35. Let this assessment be refuted by the one who possesses the exact figure and gives it. "
That is, 650 thousand people were allegedly arrested in two years. The city should have simply become depopulated. According to official figures, 93% of those arrested in the USSR were men. Thus, if we accept Solzhenitsyn's data, only 250 thousand able-bodied men should have remained in Leningrad. Who then worked at the numerous factories and factories of Leningrad, on the railways and at municipal enterprises? And who joined the people's militia en masse after the start of the Great Patriotic War?
Let's now see what proportion were prisoners in the USSR, calculated per 100 thousand of the population. In the 1930s. (in the midst of the terror) in Soviet prisons and camps there were on average 583 convicts per 100 population. In "democratic" Russia in 000-1992. - 2002 prisoners per 647 population. In the "superdemocratic" USA in the same period - on average 100 people per 000 thousand of the population. Either there were no massive repressions in the USSR in the 626s, or even more large-scale repressions were carried out in the 100s of the XX century in Yeltsin's Russia and in the United States.
For what terms were political prisoners in the USSR sentenced? Apparently for at least 10 years? It turns out that in 1936 42,2% of them were sentenced to a term of up to 5 years, 50,7% received a term of 5-10 years. Until 1937, the 10-year term was the maximum.
And what about the death rate in the "Stalinist camps"? Solzhenitsyn, without batting an eye, claimed: 1% of all prisoners per day died (!).
“They say (again they say - who says where and when?) That in the first winter, from 1931 to 1932, one hundred thousand and died out - as much as was constantly on the channel (Belomorsko-Baltic). Why not believe it? "
Indeed, why not believe the liar Solzhenitsyn - on condition that reading his libel will be imbecile.
In fact, the death rate in the camps in peacetime did not exceed the national average. The usual ration of prisoners corresponded to that of civilian workers, and the ration of the penalty box was five times higher than the Leningrad blockade norm of ordinary male workers.
Now appreciate the following passage from Solzhenitsyn:
“When we, steamed, sweaty meat, were kneaded and pushed into funnels, we shouted to the guards from the depths:“ Wait, you bastards! Truman will be on you! They will throw an atomic bomb on your head! " And the guards were cowardly silent. "
In this place, one recalls the lines about Moscow from Brodsky's disgusting (in every sense) poem "Performance":
"The best view of this city is if you get into a bomber."
And the epigram of Valeria Vyushkina:
“No, the scoundrel did not care at all!
After all, Hitler for him is a hero of the bourgeois will!
His anti-Soviet nonsense is held at school!
Solzhenitsyn the liar is full of sins!
Vermont scumbag, impudent all more,
He appealed to Reagan: “Socialism until
Will you tolerate ?! Moscow is time for a long time
Bomb like Hiroshima! Sorry for the bomb, or what?! .. "
After all, Hitler for him is a hero of the bourgeois will!
His anti-Soviet nonsense is held at school!
Solzhenitsyn the liar is full of sins!
Vermont scumbag, impudent all more,
He appealed to Reagan: “Socialism until
Will you tolerate ?! Moscow is time for a long time
Bomb like Hiroshima! Sorry for the bomb, or what?! .. "
This refers to the speech of Solzhenitsyn, shown in the film "The Price of Peace and Freedom", which was created by order of the American "Committee on the Existing Danger" (1978). Solzhenitsyn says there about our country:
“The world's evil, hateful to humanity, is being concentrated. And it is determined to destroy your system. Should we expect it to hit your border with a crowbar and that American youth will have to die on the borders of your continent? "
That is, there was still a veiled call to strike at the USSR.
In general, all this, of course, is ridiculous: the coward and informer Solzhenitsyn threatens the guards. He is not afraid to receive cuffs from them, or an increase in the term for a political statement. And in addition, he is well aware of the secret "Atomic Project", as well as the plans of US President Truman.
Solzhenitsyn's exaggerated figures on the number of prisoners in Kolyma, where “9 months winter - rest summer”, And not only prisoners, but all goods and supplies are brought once a year - to navigation. And until now, the population is regulated by the ability to really feed it.
In conclusion of this short story, let me remind you: on September 9, 2009, by order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation A. Fursenko, the thoroughly deceitful anti-Soviet and anti-Russian libel of Solzhenitsyn "The Gulag Archipelago" was included in the school curriculum.
At an age when children really want to love their homeland, teachers of modern Russia are forced to make them read stupid and terrible tales about the "evil empire."
A symbol of this ideological sabotage against future generations, and the attitude of the Russian authorities to the opinion of the overwhelming majority of the country's citizens, can probably be called this recent "gift" to Muscovites, which can be seen on Bolotnaya Square:
Information