Sudanese diplomat denies demand for economic aid in exchange for stationing logistics center in Port Sudan

21

An agreement on the establishment of a Russian military base on the coast of the Red Sea in Sudan will be signed shortly, statements about new conditions allegedly put forward by Sudan do not correspond to reality. This was stated by the Charge d'Affaires of Sudan in Russia Onur Ahmad Onur.

The Sudanese diplomat denied information that appeared on the eve that Khartoum was asking for economic assistance in exchange for providing territory for a military base. According to him, the decision to create a Russian military base was made at the level of the defense ministers of the two countries, and there is "mutual understanding" on this issue.



It is not true. These news - not true. This is unfounded news. The Sudanese side is not asking for any payments in connection with the military base agreement

- leads RIA News the words of the attorney.

At the same time, he confirmed that "some changes" will be made to the agreement, which are being discussed at the level of the Russian-Sudanese commission on military-technical cooperation. After discussing all the nuances, the contract will be signed and it will happen "in the near future."

The day before, the media reported that Sudan intends to demand economic assistance from Russia in exchange for the provision of territory for the logistics center of the Russian Navy. At the same time, it was argued that the initial lease would be signed for a period of five years with a subsequent extension for another 25.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    Ad
    Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official
    21 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +4
      13 September 2021 16: 18
      This is a normal situation - not everyone has gotten off the palms there yet! But it is much more adequate than in Ukraine, which is surprising - after all, there are no palm trees in Ukraine, but the Ukrainians are sitting on them! Paradox! laughing Russia will reach an agreement, practically has already reached an agreement with Sudan, but we cannot reach an agreement with "European" Ukraine ... In Sudan, even sympathetically, they ask our diplomats - "How do you communicate with these savages?" laughing

      In order not to be unfounded, as a fresh example, the speech of the deputy of the Rada Oleksiy Goncharenko (mega clown of the Ukrainian political freak show) with the story that in 1514 took place "one of the loudest victories over Moscow in Ukrainian history"... He wrote about this in Telegram. ... "Friends, Russia can be defeated. We have already done this and will definitely do it again. But our friends from Lithuania, Poland, the Baltic states do it even better." laughing

      Our Sudanese partners ask - what is the height of palm trees in Ukraine ?? laughing
    2. +3
      13 September 2021 16: 22
      It will take ONLY five years and they will begin to "twist their arms" ..
    3. +1
      13 September 2021 16: 23
      And where to laugh? One writes one thing, another another, and the truth is in the wine ??? laughing
    4. +2
      13 September 2021 16: 23
      ... The Sudanese diplomat denied information that appeared on the eve that Khartoum was asking for economic assistance in exchange for providing territory for a military base.

      And we are like that, even if you don’t want to ... we will give ... bully
      You don't even need to ask us ...
      1. +4
        13 September 2021 16: 38
        People have a lot of grief, they want to bargain. Name your price, let's talk like cultured people. You haven't heard our sound yet. (M.M. Zhvanetsky)
    5. 0
      13 September 2021 16: 25
      To be a base or not to be, to live in Sudan or not to live, is a philosophical question, no worse than Shakespeare's. In the past, Russia also has the experience of arranging a revolution ...
      Most likely, Sudan will be offered conditions to refuse which it will not be able to. And there will be mutual understanding ... laughing
      1. +2
        13 September 2021 16: 35
        Quote: prior
        To be base or not to be

        only an MTO point that does not require large costs
        it cannot be otherwise with a short lease
        1. -1
          13 September 2021 16: 36
          We would only have to drop an anchor there, and then about the timing ... lol
    6. 0
      13 September 2021 16: 28
      The Sudanese side is not asking for any payments in connection with the military base agreement

      Between the lines ... wink
    7. -1
      13 September 2021 16: 32
      All damned Afghanistan, showed to the Americans. Sudan, it seems, does not count on them. In a difficult moment for Sudan, they will run away and look for them.
    8. 0
      13 September 2021 16: 46
      ... At the same time, it was argued that the initial lease would be signed for a period of five years with a subsequent extension for another 25.


      They will build a base. Military. With all the infrastructure. For five years. And then the picturesque guys with rings in their noses will come and say, "Go away, snowballs." I wish I could see it.
      1. +2
        13 September 2021 17: 38
        Do you at least understand the differences between the base and the MTO item? In the latter case, it can be a reed warehouse, a hostel, a pier and a couple of supply ships. We are negotiating not about assistance, but about military technical cooperation. So we will pay with spare parts for T-55, 62, 72. We still do not have a full-fledged base in Tartus even in Syria. So stop whining. The head is empty, there is zero information, but the conclusions are at the level of the Almighty - no options.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    9. +2
      13 September 2021 16: 55
      Of course Sudan will demand.
      And there is nothing surprising here.
    10. +4
      13 September 2021 17: 02
      Sudanese diplomat denies demand for economic aid in exchange for stationing logistics center in Port Sudan

      Of course. In Sudan, they learned that we have nowhere to set up MTO points, there is not enough shore, and decided to share. Free of charge.
      Forgive the banality, but the Sudanese diplomat shows his professionalism: he hides the true state of affairs with a poker face behind lies.
      1. +2
        13 September 2021 17: 41
        Quote: Galleon
        Sorry for the banality, but the Sudanese diplomat shows his professionalism: he hides the true state of affairs with a poker face behind lies

        And where did you get the idea that the previous message was true? About requirements, 5 years, etc. ? Here at least the diplomat is responsible for the bazaar, but who is the source of information there?
      2. +3
        13 September 2021 17: 44
        Sudan is full of Soviet military equipment and weapons. They need parts and equipment for repair and maintenance.
    11. 0
      13 September 2021 19: 42
      We just buy from Sudan ... and what does it produce? It doesn't matter, we'll buy it anyway!
      And we need a point there. We'll moor our Olterra and watch.
    12. 0
      13 September 2021 19: 45
      there will be "some changes" in the agreement

      If it means that the members of the new government also want to get "bakshish", then if it is within reasonable limits, then this is the norm. True, in African countries, the eastern wisdom is often forgotten that it is better to get within the bounds of decency and maintain good relations for the future, than to try to grab it like the last time and leave the client angry. (In this, by the way, our officials are very similar to them :))
    13. 0
      13 September 2021 20: 16
      Yesterday I wrote that nothing is known for another 5 years and ours have not confirmed it. They wrote about 25 years in the news. In the end, bullshit and I was right. Stick the cons to yourself
    14. 0
      13 September 2021 21: 11
      Someone constantly makes stuffing on this topic, then ours and the Sudanese have to refute.
    15. 0
      14 September 2021 00: 38
      It is not true. This news is not true. This is unfounded news. The Sudanese side is not asking for any payments in connection with the military base agreement
      Well, if so! good

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"