The Third Arms Revolution: A Major Taiwanese Entrepreneur on Modern Warfare

95

Military technology has changed dramatically over the past two decades. If the first revolution in the military sphere was the invention of the firearms weapons (the appearance of gunpowder), the second is the appearance of nuclear weapons, now we are all watching the third revolution in the world of weapons - the emergence and introduction of artificial intelligence into the military sphere.

According to Kai-fu Lee, a major Taiwanese entrepreneur, the former head of Google China, the evolution from landmines to guided missiles was just a warm-up before the real autonomy of means of destroying enemy personnel and equipment using artificial intelligence. The introduction of AI into the military sphere will mean the possibility of conducting a full-fledged battle without human intervention. According to the expert, the active introduction of artificial intelligence into the military sphere will entail the emergence of new threats to humanity.



Thus, small drones, which can be used to eliminate political opponents, commanders of enemy troops. For example, in 2018, a similar drone was used to assassinate the President of Venezuela. The cost of producing a drone is quite modest. It can be bought for a thousand dollars, and this greatly reduces the costs of those involved. All components for the drone today, as the Taiwanese entrepreneur writes, can be found on the Internet.

The following risks are associated with the emergence of unmanned vehicles that can be used on the battlefield. Thanks to drones, firstly, the lives of soldiers, who, in turn, would have to fight on the front line, should be saved, and secondly, significant financial resources associated with the need to ensure the protection of crew members are saved.

Kai-fu Lee believes that the main problem associated with the use of unmanned systems in the military sphere is their inconsistency with the moral principles on which mankind has based all its activities for millennia. After all, artificial intelligence makes it possible for machines to take a person's life without being guided by any ethical considerations.

Such a machine will ignore surrender, in fact it is an instrument of murder, and this cannot but frighten us.

It is not for nothing that UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said:

The prospect of introducing machines that lack circumspection and at the same time have the ability to take human lives is morally disgusting.

Ultimately, the existence of AI-controlled war machines makes it possible to lower the threshold of war and make it available to everyone, including terrorist groups.
95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    13 September 2021 16: 11
    Soon the drones will "beat off bread" from the killers.
    1. -1
      13 September 2021 16: 13
      While the movie:

      And here's the reality:
    2. -1
      13 September 2021 16: 47
      Taiwanese entrepreneur, 20 years behind .... With all due respect, what does he have to do with weapons ... Another ode to AI?
      1. 0
        13 September 2021 18: 08
        Quote: Volkof
        Taiwanese entrepreneur, 20 years behind .... With all due respect, what does he have to do with weapons ... Another ode to AI?

        similarly, firstly Taiwanese, secondly, something tryndit
      2. 0
        14 September 2021 17: 25
        Taiwanese entrepreneur, 20 years behind

        Probably just watched the 20-year-old film "Body Swap" with drone killers.
  2. +5
    13 September 2021 16: 13
    Kai-fu Lee well, and a surname, drug addicts will appreciate.
  3. +11
    13 September 2021 16: 13
    that the main problem associated with the use of unmanned systems in the military sphere is their inconsistency with the moral principles on which mankind has based all its activities for millennia.
    What principles, what morality)? The car is unlikely to cut off their heads for fun or nail children to trees, and so on that a person does quite calmly for himself. And here not long ago people in slippers threw out the most modern army from their country.
    1. -1
      13 September 2021 16: 22
      Quote: Trapp1st
      And here not long ago people in slippers threw out the most modern army from their country.

      Legends and myths from the guardians and sect of witnesses to the decline of America. You are already tired of the worse bitter radish. Stop cluttering up the resource with your virtual overrides.
      1. +3
        13 September 2021 16: 24
        Legends and myths from the guardians and the sect of witnesses of almighty America. You are already tired of the worse bitter radish. Do not litter the resource with your virtual overrides.
        1. -1
          13 September 2021 16: 57
          And Cho was not immediately recorded in Bandera? This is the standard set for your guards. State Department agent, liberal, Bandera.
          1. +2
            13 September 2021 17: 02
            And Cho was not immediately recorded in Bandera?
            As I understand it, write it down and attribute it to your part ...
            1. -3
              13 September 2021 17: 08
              I am just stating facts. You yourself painted yourself in the colors that you painted.
              1. +3
                13 September 2021 17: 10
                You yourself painted yourself in the colors that you painted.
                Masterpiece, I approve!
              2. +2
                13 September 2021 17: 23
                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                You painted yourself in the colors that you painted

                Can't look into tomorrow?

                Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                Legends and myths from the guardians and sect of witnesses of the decline of America

                Here is your colleague from the greatness sect of America
                1. -3
                  13 September 2021 18: 19
                  Quote: hrych
                  Can't look into tomorrow?

                  Can. And Klitschko is a masterpiece.
                  Quote: hrych
                  Here is your colleague from the greatness sect of America

                  When Bandera's people write this about Donbass, it is fascism, when patriots write the same thing about Afghans fleeing from cruel fanatics, this is obviously different.
                  1. +5
                    13 September 2021 18: 37
                    And who is to blame for the fact that the Americans did it in Afghanistan? The suffering of people in Donbass, solely thanks to the Americans, who staged the Maidan. And also the Biden family wanted to get to the Donetsk oil shale. Therefore, whether Crimea, Donbass, Syria, Venezuela, Bolivia, or Afghan is an American disgrace and failure. These are America's shattered plans and dreams. And the arguments in favor of roll-ups, against those praying in the United States, like you, and even criticism towards your idol, do not accept that you choke on radish wassat
                    1. -3
                      13 September 2021 18: 45
                      Quote: hrych
                      Therefore, that Crimea, Donbass, Syria, Venezuela, Bolivia, Afghan is an American disgrace and failure.

                      And how do you justify this? What is your evidence? Even if in some places things are not going the way the United States would like, it is somehow silly to write it down as a failure. If only because no one sees any catastrophe. Well, except for the sect of witnesses to the death of America tomorrow for dinner.
                      Quote: hrych
                      And the arguments in favor of roll-ups, against those praying in the United States, like you, that even criticism towards your idol is unacceptable, that you choke on radish

                      That is, you do not read what I write at all. It's clear. The guards, as always, demonstrate simply amazing stupidity. Well, I leave you alone with her, you are well together, I will not interfere.
                      1. +3
                        13 September 2021 18: 51
                        There is no need for justification, unless for the enchanted wassat Okay, in a nutshell. Although Nuland ran around with opium pies, Crimea and Donbass were gone. Maduro survived and the junta collapsed in Bolivia. In Syria, Obama's squadron has retired. Well, Afghan, finished the illusion, isn't it yours.
        2. +1
          13 September 2021 17: 00

          IS-80_RVGK2 (Makar)
          Today, 16: 22
          NEW

          +1
          Quote: Trapp1st
          And here not long ago people in slippers threw out the most modern army from their country.

          Legends and myths from the guardians and sect of witnesses to the decline of America. You are already tired of the worse bitter radish. Stop cluttering up the resource with your virtual overrides.


          Trapp1st (Trapp1st)
          Today, 16: 24
          NEW

          +2
          Legends and myths from the guardians and the sect of witnesses of almighty America. You are already tired of the worse bitter radish. Do not litter the resource with your virtual overrides.

          Are you there, copying each other's essays? laughing
      2. -1
        13 September 2021 16: 25
        Legends and myths from the guardians and sect of witnesses to the decline of America. You are already tired of the worse bitter radish

        What ? Are you cracking up? )))
        The first official defeat of the loan interest - did not take root in Afghanistan))))
        1. -2
          13 September 2021 16: 59
          Quote: lucul
          What ? Are you cracking up? )))

          Human stupidity has always infuriated me. Even mine. Although, for obvious reasons, I am much more loyal to her.
          1. -2
            13 September 2021 17: 03
            Human stupidity has always infuriated me. Even mine.
            This explains why you are mad.
            1. -2
              13 September 2021 17: 09
              Undoubtedly. It is difficult to be smart among the beautiful.
              1. -1
                13 September 2021 17: 11
                It is difficult to be smart among the beautiful.
                It's hard to be stupid and scary)
                1. -3
                  13 September 2021 17: 41
                  I sympathize with your grief. smile
          2. -2
            13 September 2021 17: 07
            Human stupidity has always infuriated me. Even mine. Although, for obvious reasons, I am much more loyal to her.

            But I am calm, on the contrary, dozens of options slip through my mind at once, what this could cause.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  4. -2
    13 September 2021 16: 18
    now we are all watching the third revolution in the world of weapons - the emergence and implementation of artificial intelligence in the military sphere.

    To begin with, you need to at least create it, and then implement it)))
    1. +4
      13 September 2021 16: 32
      You imagine AI as a certain epic sage, or a scientist, or a certain cabinet that blinks with lights and knows everything in the world. laughing
      In fact, AI is .. a "nimble cheeky teenager" with about zero erudition. He knows how to do one thing. But stubbornly, autonomously, with imagination, completely fearless and with great speed.
      And such computer-chips "teenage hooligans" have already been created.
      Only for now are they afraid to place them in military equipment.
      1. 0
        13 September 2021 16: 41
        In fact, AI is .. a "nimble cheeky teenager" with about zero erudition. He knows how to do one thing. But stubbornly, autonomously, with imagination, completely fearless and with great speed.
        And such computer-chips "teenage hooligans" have already been created.
        Only for now are they afraid to place them in military equipment.

        So can do "one thing" and any children's toy on an electric power supply. But that doesn't mean she's an AI.
        You read about the definition of intelligence first. And then they wishful thinking for the sake of marketing sales.
        1. -1
          13 September 2021 16: 52
          "children's toy on electric power supply" ///
          ---
          No one controls these children's toys in their work on assignment. Even those who created them will not know what tactics the toy will choose to achieve its ultimate goal.
          1. -2
            13 September 2021 17: 04
            No one controls these children's toys in their work on assignment. Even those who created them will not know what tactics the toy will choose to achieve its ultimate goal.

            Any of this children's toy has a framework (horizon of action), rigidly determined by its creator, beyond which it will not be able to go.
            But AI will be able to go beyond these limits - in fact, this is the main difference between AI and a child's toy.
            1. -2
              13 September 2021 17: 17
              All living beings have a framework (horizon of action). Including people.
              We also have a creator - evolution.
              In this we are no different from machines.
              1. +1
                13 September 2021 18: 42
                All living beings have a framework (horizon of action). Including people.
                We also have a creator - evolution.

                You did not understand the essence - if, say, the designer specifically limited the practical ceiling from 10 m to 000 m (frame) to the drone, then it will not rise above 5 m, that is, it will not go beyond the algorithm.
                The real AI will easily come out.
          2. -1
            13 September 2021 18: 14
            Quote: voyaka uh
            "children's toy on electric power supply" ///
            ---
            No one controls these children's toys in their work on assignment. Even those who created them will not know what tactics the toy will choose to achieve its ultimate goal.

            nothing new "smeared, washed off, repeated, smeared, washed off, repeated"
        2. -1
          13 September 2021 17: 16
          In fact, AI is .. "nimble cheeky teenager" with about zero erudition.

          So this is AI from our Israeli colleagues. Probably they also started having problems with human intelligence.
          1. 0
            13 September 2021 17: 38
            good
            Naturally so. laughing
            AI from Russia will be some kind of electronic
            Tolstoyevsky (Tolstoy-Dostoevsky) with a broad soul, spiritual quest and torment and love for nature ...
            1. -1
              13 September 2021 17: 46
              In fact, AI is .. "nimble cheeky teenager" with about zero erudition.

              But he will have everything "longer and thicker", well, as usual ... feel
      2. Bow
        +2
        14 September 2021 10: 08
        Humanitarians are merciless.
        AI, it turns out, is not a system of algorithms / methods, but a kind of physical chip)))
        I will tell you one little secret: the program is purple, it is launched on a computer blinking with lights, or on something more brutal. The main thing is that the iron pulls
  5. +3
    13 September 2021 16: 18
    Terminator in action ... Yes
  6. 0
    13 September 2021 16: 19
    AI is of course interesting.
    But another thing is also interesting, in front of a real threat of the destruction of millions of people, even a super-duper armed America retreated before North Korea.
    Unacceptable damage ....!
    I am not calling not to develop weapons, but I think that even artificial intelligence will retreat in the face of unacceptable damage.
    Glory to the Strategic Missile Forces.
    And AI can also come in handy, drive the natives ...
  7. +2
    13 September 2021 16: 20
    The prospect of introducing machines that lack circumspection and at the same time have the ability to take human lives is morally disgusting.


    These "talking heads" from various useless organizations are simply touching. Each car that goes to the enemy, instead of a soldier, is the height of humanity and shows the high morality of a nation that takes care of its children. War is such a thing that there are enough deaths anyway, and if the machine saves at least one soldier or kills one enemy, then the effort deserves it.
    1. 0
      13 September 2021 17: 06
      The main thing here is that you do not turn out to be this very enemy. And you know, under capitalism it is very simple.
      1. +2
        13 September 2021 17: 19
        But do you know under capitalism ...


        How? Are you good at capitalism?
        Capitalism was in your country for the last time in 1917, in its specificity at that time. And now you have a neo-feudal version of capitalism, in which "capitalism" is just that, for a catchphrase, and which was invented and adjusted by former communists and KGBists, so again into the wrong gate. First rebuild this capitalism, then argue what is easy in it and what is difficult. laughing
        1. 0
          13 September 2021 18: 25
          Now you have a neo-feudal version of capitalism

          Yes, in Russia and feudalism was not. Klyuchevsky also noted that the princely dignity was transmitted exclusively in the family of Rurik. It was not a title.
          Sincerely
          1. -1
            14 September 2021 17: 08
            Yes, in Russia and feudalism was not. Klyuchevsky also noted that the princely dignity was transmitted exclusively in the family of Rurik. It was not a title.

            No need to drive. In Russia there was a title of prince, which was roughly equivalent to the Western title of "duke". And the members of the royal family were "grand dukes".
            Gagarins, Dolgorukovs, Golitsyns, Dashkovs, Volkonskys, Rurikovichs, Gediminovichs, Tatar, Georgian, and others, and so on - hundreds.

            Is Russophobic arrogance bursting again?
            1. +1
              14 September 2021 17: 53
              No need to drive.

              We open Klyuchevsky volumes V - VI
              Those whom you have listed are the so-called "service princes". You still write Valtsman and Zelensky as princes! Delight the Darkest ...
              Sincerely
            2. 0
              14 September 2021 18: 00
              Quote: alch3mist
              Yes, in Russia and feudalism was not. Klyuchevsky also noted that the princely dignity was transmitted exclusively in the family of Rurik. It was not a title.

              No need to drive. In Russia there was a title of prince, which was roughly equivalent to the Western title of "duke". And the members of the royal family were "grand dukes".
              Gagarins, Dolgorukovs, Golitsyns, Dashkovs, Volkonskys, Rurikovichs, Gediminovichs, Tatar, Georgian, and others, and so on - hundreds.

              and from what year then? in Russia and serfdom was not until they took over from Europe
        2. 0
          13 September 2021 18: 26
          Quote: Keyser Soze
          Are you good at capitalism?

          itit,)))))))))))))))))))))))))) Do you understand what else is written in the manual?
        3. 0
          13 September 2021 18: 29
          Quote: Keyser Soze
          Capitalism was in your country for the last time in 1917, in its specificity at that time. And now you have a neo-feudal version of capitalism, in which "capitalism" is just that, for a catchphrase, and which was invented and adjusted by former communists and KGBists, so again into the wrong gate.

          Do you have many such experts on Russia in Bulgaria? If yes, then poor Bulgaria. And now it is clear why you refused to become a gas distribution hub and cut money like the Germans by kindly giving it to your best friends the Turks. Apparently these same experts are in charge of your economy. laughing
          Quote: Keyser Soze
          First rebuild this capitalism, then argue what is easy in it and what is difficult.

          Well, where do we wild uncouth Asians to the European superpower Bulgaria. We will, of course, try to keep the economy up to your level. But it won't be easy. Bulgaria for us, I will say so, is an almost unattainable ideal.
          1. 0
            14 September 2021 10: 21
            now it is clear why you refused to become a gas distribution hub and cut money like the Germans by kindly giving it to your best friends the Turks.


            My dear, well, please, stick to the facts - the Balkan stream is working to its fullest, the loot - we'll cut it off, our gas pipeline, not Gazprom's. We are expanding gas storage facilities and let Azerbaijani gas through it. Soon we will let loose and liquefied from Alexandroupolis. All in chocolate.
            And the South Stream did not work, because the notorious 3rd EU directive. Gazprom did not agree to give the ownership of the pipe to us and did not fuse. The EU is more important to us than Gazprom, after all. But we went to meet Gazprom and rebuilt it ourselves, and now gas is flowing again, but by a different route. You will now have to solve this dilemma on Nord Stream 2. Let's see Gazprom how to manage it.

            We will, of course, try to keep the economy up to your level.


            Yes, try. At least to the level of all the Balkans. For the first half of the year, the Greeks grew by 16,2% of GDP, we have 9,9%, the Serbs also have about 8-9%. The economy has bypassed the pre-pandemic stance, despite the fact that tourism is what we have, that the Greeks have died because of restrictions.
            1. +1
              14 September 2021 12: 34
              Quote: Keyser Soze
              For the first half of the year, the Greeks grew by 16,2% of GDP, we have 9,9%, the Serbs also have about 8-9%.

              Let's see what happens in a year. And then we have the same thing. We turned off part of the capacities, turned on part of the capacities. Crazy growth. But in fact, just recovery after a short fall.
              Quote: Keyser Soze
              Yes, try. At least to the level of all the Balkans.

              Why at least? The Balkans are now a driver of economic growth. Biden is shocked. Already changing plans to contain and counter China, to the same but only in relation to the Balkans. Otherwise, soon Khan America. The Bulgarian tugrik will replace the dollar.
              1. -1
                14 September 2021 13: 05
                The Bulgarian tugrik will replace the dollar.


                Hahahaah, even I felt funny ... laughing
                Laugh enough - the rate of our tugrik to the euro is 1,95 leva per euro. One tugrik costs 44 rubles.
                Second, our tugrik / euro exchange rate changed for the last time in ..... 1998. Have another laugh.
                Thirdly, we have about 2% in excess of loans for housing. If we accept the euro, it will fall to 0,5-1%.

                Are you still funny? bully
                1. +1
                  14 September 2021 13: 18
                  Quote: Keyser Soze
                  Are you still funny?

                  And funny and sad. This whole story of yours about the mighty Bulgarian economy painfully reminds me of the stories of Russian bourgeois patriots. And so, yes, I believe you that Bulgaria is an earthly paradise. The truth is that people in this paradise do not really linger. But these are trifles of course.
                  1. -1
                    14 September 2021 13: 35
                    so, yes, I believe that Bulgaria is an earthly paradise.


                    As nature, then yes, it is an earthly paradise. As a politician, we also have former communists and KGB agents stole everything and, of course, broke everything. Corruption problems. But we are changing governments and sooner or later we will put the former in jail. We have no kings, thank God.

                    The truth is that people in this paradise do not really linger.


                    People are coming back little by little. Good specialists work everywhere for good money. So we attract Russian settlers too. Etih, highly educated. They like the climate and tranquility here, and they like the EU. Half a million have property with us and 50 thousand and citizenship. Their children attend our schools and will already be Bulgarians.
                    1. 0
                      14 September 2021 14: 38
                      Quote: Keyser Soze
                      People are coming back little by little.

                      Somehow, according to statistics, it is not noticeable.
                      Quote: Keyser Soze
                      We have no kings, thank God.

                      Well, they don’t live with you. For some reason, the European bureaucracy does not want to live in the Bulgarian paradise.
                      1. +1
                        14 September 2021 15: 00
                        Well, they don’t live with you.


                        But yours are at home. laughing
                        Already a whole cooperative was created to manage the largest power in the world. laughing
                        Eti will definitely extend your middle class from 17 rubles (as the chief of the cooperative said) to the level of Bulgaria. laughing

                        Sorry for the banter, but you deserve it. From the belfry of a foreigner, you were once an Empire. Then they became the Soviet Empire. Both were great. Now your status as a cooperative property, with a non-tsar at the head and half a million Roszhandarmeria, guarded from your own people, causes pity for people and laughter when trying to have cardboard greatness.
                  2. 0
                    14 September 2021 18: 09
                    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                    And funny and sad. This whole story of yours about the mighty Bulgarian economy painfully reminds me of the stories of Russian bourgeois patriots.

                    there are also great dill and great Balts, everything is covered in chocolate and move the world economy
  8. +1
    13 September 2021 16: 22
    The main problem of using artificial intelligence in combat systems is the lack of a mathematical apparatus that summarizes various approaches and algorithms.
    Sincerely
    1. -3
      13 September 2021 17: 45
      Never run past a hive with bees?
      Bees have no central brains, no algorithms, and no generalizing mathematical apparatus.
      But they attack together and sting can hurt to death.

      So is a swarm of drones. Network communication (neighbor with neighbors), simple collision control, distribution of targets between neighbors.
      1. +1
        13 September 2021 18: 18
        Bees have no central brain

        Have you ever seen a bee dance? In its dance, each bee gives its neighbors coordinates according to the position of the sun ... Try to program this ...
        Sincerely
        1. -4
          13 September 2021 21: 19
          It is programmed with brilliance and ease.
          Drones in flight freely exchange such information.
          Look for interest in the actions of the drone swarm in the attack. Someone posted the video above.

          Drones, even if they are launched in hundreds of dense flocks, will not collide at night and will be able to attack in an orderly manner.
          1. +1
            13 September 2021 21: 44
            Throw off the link to the code?
            Sincerely
  9. +2
    13 September 2021 16: 27
    And then after the third revolution, the introduction of AI into the military sphere, there will immediately be Skynet and the enslavement of mankind by terminators)))
  10. 0
    13 September 2021 16: 55
    Let's say a situation - the army was replaced by drones and as a result of hostilities they ended. So, what is next? And then again the soldier on the front line in the trenches. And if there are no trained soldiers, this country will quickly disappear.
    1. +7
      13 September 2021 17: 13
      So, what is next?

      The same as after the "completion" of living soldiers: negotiations for peace or surrender (depending on the state of affairs of the enemy).

      Moreover, a living soldier needs to be raised for 20 years, and a robot can be made in a week literally in a garage (if you have components: material for the body, power plant, electromagnetic drives, microcircuits and any electronic loose). So the robots will "run out" slower than the soldiers.
    2. +1
      13 September 2021 20: 13
      Let's say a situation - the army was replaced by drones and as a result of hostilities they ended


      So this is not something in a vacuum. Likewise, all sorts of countries with a stretch to be considered people in the 18-19 century thought. Their ships, muskets / rifles and machine guns will run out and then we will show them to London and chase.

      AI is not only about combat vehicles, but also about manufacturing. Therefore, the increase in their output = only available energy and resources, and the resources can be taken away from those who cannot yet become robots in large quantities or beyond exhibitions and presentations.

      Again, the death of 100 drones is just a loss of resources and money. The death of 000 soldiers is already a huge blow to the entire army and its morale, seething in society, and even surrender. And the owner of mega-factories, automated production will make up for the losses with the same or even better machines. Whereas the traditional army, with heavy casualties, is always faced with training / recruiting opportunities.
  11. +1
    13 September 2021 17: 00
    Such a machine will ignore surrender, in fact it is an instrument of murder, and this cannot but frighten us.
    belay Rave. For hundreds of years, the Inquisition burned repentant sinners at the stake, without any remorse. This did not frighten the businessman, oh yes, this is different. fool
  12. 0
    13 September 2021 18: 19
    and drown out the signals? radioelectronic fighting there? Ipusls vasyakie) who burn the electronic devices if there is no protection, nope? and it is interesting, but until the ii is protected from this, then there is nothing that will not have a current, you can destroy countries where this protection is not available) although if you release 1 drones and hit all targets from 1 gift), de-energize destroy blind hearing, you can cut it, but there are risks as they said the unknown randomness)
    1. 0
      13 September 2021 19: 49
      Ipusls vasyakie) who burn the electronic devices if there is no protection, nope?

      Have you heard about the Faraday theorem?
      Sincerely
  13. -1
    13 September 2021 22: 15
    Not necessarily AI war machines will destroy everyone in a row; if this were so, then it is no longer intelligence. The main thing is not to forget that behind the combat robots with AI there is always a person and he bears full responsibility for the actions of the robots. New criminals against humanity will not be able to hide behind the robots; they will have to be personally responsible for the crimes. Perhaps they will die at the hands of a vaunted AI.
  14. 0
    14 September 2021 19: 19
    War of the future: kids are gunners at computers, soldiers raise their hands and surrender to drones.