The world's first nuclear air-to-air missile

57
Launch of a training version of the AIR-2 Genie rocket from the Convair F-106 Delta Dart interceptor, photo: wikimedia.org

An unguided air-to-air missile equipped with a nuclear warhead was created in the United States at the very beginning of the Cold War. One such missile could clear the sky from an entire squadron of enemy bombers. Fortunately for all mankind, the missile, designated AIR-2 Genie, has never been used in combat. And on trials, the Americans released the Genie from the bottle only once.

Response to the Soviet bombing threat


In 1949, the USSR conducted the first successful tests of its own nuclear bomb. The bomb tested was more powerful than those that the Americans dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. With the advent of Moscow's nuclear weapons, Washington's concerns about its own security have grown markedly.



Against this background, the world was actively developing the bomber aviation, which in those years and until the advent of intercontinental ballistic missiles will remain the main means of delivering nuclear weapons to the target. In the USSR, Tu-4 bombers went into serial production, which were an unlicensed copy of the American Boeing B-29 Superfortress bomber. Re-assembled aircraft using Soviet-made components and equipment could reach the continental United States.

In addition, in the late 1940s - early 1950s, the USSR began a program to create the Tu-95 strategic turboprop bomber. The first flight of the Tu-95 bomber took place in 1952.

The United States knew about these programs and adequately assessed the threat posed by the new Soviet bombers.

The world's first nuclear air-to-air missile
Tu-4 bomber, photo: wikimedia.org

As a radical response to the bombing threat, it was proposed to use an air-launched missile with a nuclear warhead. This decision seemed justified in every sense. Fighters of the end of World War II and the first post-war vehicles were armed mainly with machine-gun and cannon armament. These weapons were no longer enough to successfully combat a large number of multi-engine bombers.

The salvo firing of unguided aircraft missiles at the formation of bombers did not look the best, and there were still several years left before the development of truly effective guided air-to-air missiles. But even these early missiles were pretty primitive. The first victory in aerial combat using a guided missile was won on September 24, 1958, when a Taiwanese F-86 fighter jet shot down a Chinese MiG-15 with an AIM-9B Sidewinder missile.

What was the American "Genie"


Before the invention of guided air-to-air missiles and the appearance of the first ICBMs, it was necessary to somehow neutralize the bombing threat. To this end, in 1954, the United States began a program aimed at studying the use of air-to-air missiles with a nuclear warhead. For the greatest simplicity and reliability, the rocket was made unguided. Given the high power and radius of the explosion, accuracy was rightly considered unnecessary.

The development of a new rocket began in the same year, and already in 1955, the first rocket prototype was presented for dynamic tests. The rocket was developed by the Douglas company, and the novelty itself received the designation McDonnell Douglas Air-2 Genie (factory index of the manufacturer MB-1). The first missiles entered service in 1957.

McDonnell Douglas Air-2 Genie rocket on a transport cart, photo: wikimedia.org

The rocket was quite simple and was an unguided aircraft munition, which was propelled by a Thiokol SR49-TC-1 solid-propellant rocket engine, which developed a thrust of 162 kN. The engine power was enough to accelerate the rocket to a speed of Mach 3,3 (about 1100 m / s) in two seconds of operation. After 12 seconds of flight, after all the fuel burned out, an explosion occurred, the maximum missile launch range was estimated at 9,6 km.

The rocket with a diameter of 444,5 mm weighed 372,9 kg. The length of the rocket was 2,95 meters. A nuclear warhead W25 with a capacity of 1,5 kt was installed on the rocket. It was a low-yield nuclear warhead specially designed for the Air-2 Genie missile. The warhead had a combined nuclear charge made of uranium and plutonium and was the first device in the United States to be manufactured using the sealed pit technology, with all the elements placed in a sealed metal case.

The effective radius of destruction of the W25 nuclear warhead was estimated at 300 meters. After launching the rocket, the carrier aircraft had to quickly perform an evasive maneuver so as not to be in the affected area. At the same time, the attacked bomber had practically no chance. The short approach time and high speed did not allow the missile to be hit by the defensive armament of the bomber, and the large explosion radius was guaranteed to disable the enemy aircraft.

"Genie" burst out of the bottle


Although the missile remained in service for a fairly long time, until 1985, the United States conducted the only tests of this type of nuclear weapon. This happened as part of a series of nuclear tests in Nevada, designated "Operation Plumbbob".

In total, from May 28 to October 7, 1957, the US military conducted 29 explosions at the Nevada nuclear test site.

The launch of an AIR-2 Genie rocket with a nuclear warhead from an F-89 Scorpion interceptor during Plumbbob tests, photo: wikimedia.org

A feature of the tests was a large number of atmospheric explosions, which were carried out using special towers of various heights (from tens to hundreds of meters). In addition to the towers, balloons were used, which raised bombs to a height of several hundred meters. Also, as part of Operation Plumbbob, the only air tests of the AIR-2 Genie rocket took place in stories.

An air-to-air missile with a nuclear warhead was launched from the F-89 all-weather jet fighter-interceptor on July 19, 1957. The explosion of a rocket with a 1,5 kt warhead occurred at an altitude of 5639 meters. After launching the missile, the interceptor pilots had to perform a sharp maneuver away from the epicenter of the explosion.

The Genie trials were pushed through by the US Air Force.

The Air Force Command sought not only to test the new weapon, but also to prove the safety of its use over densely populated areas of the United States. To confirm this theory, five Air Force officers and a photographer were on the ground just below the epicenter of the explosion. All of them were in regular field uniforms and had no protective equipment.

Aerial explosion of the AIR-2 Genie rocket on July 19, 1957, photo: wikimedia.org

The photographer captured them standing with the sign Ground Zero Population 5 (epicenter of the explosion, population 5). In this regard, the tests can be considered quite successful. They did demonstrate that there were no serious health consequences for the civilian population on the ground. All participants in the experiment survived this explosion for decades, the last of the participating officers passed away in 2014.

The fate of the project


Air-to-air nuclear missiles remained in service with the US Air Force until the mid-1980s. At the same time, the production of AIR-2 Genie missiles ended in 1962. In total, more than three thousand copies of this rocket were released (excluding training and test prototypes).

In the United States, the missile was finally removed from service in 1985, a year earlier it happened in Canada. Canada turned out to be Jinn's only export customer.

Missiles with nuclear warheads were received for arming the CF-101 fighter-interceptors back in 1963. Despite being in the arsenal of the Canadian Air Force, the missiles all this time were the property of the United States and were in storage bases under the supervision of the American military.

The appearance of the AIR-2 Genie rocket, photo: wikimedia.org

At the same time, the missiles lost their importance already with the advent of ICBMs.

After that, there was no need to be afraid of an armada of Soviet bombers that would drop hydrogen bombs on American cities. The concept of mutual assured destruction implemented by Moscow and Washington using a huge number of intercontinental ballistic missiles made Jinn with nuclear warheads a vestige of the beginning of the Cold War.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    8 September 2021 18: 28
    I would like to thank the author for a really interesting story. I liked it very much, and in moderation, and there are illustrations.
    1. +4
      9 September 2021 00: 27
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      I would like to thank the author for a really interesting story. I liked it very much, and in moderation, and there are illustrations.

      In 2016, VO published the cycle North America Air Defense System, there is much fuller and more interesting.
  2. -9
    8 September 2021 18: 31
    Either I didn’t understand something, or how such nonsense could have occurred to someone to shoot down a bomber over his own head with a nuclear missile. He already brought you a vigorous gift.
    1. +9
      8 September 2021 18: 52
      So in the article it is sorted out. By the way, I saw our documentary showing the use of C25 on target. The missile was with an SBCH. The planes were destroyed.
      1. +6
        9 September 2021 02: 34
        Such missiles were in service with us for a long time on the S-75, on the S-200.
        During the exercises, they laughed - the commander ordered the use of a self-liquidator. But this is not about Air-to-Air, but about SAM. Nevertheless, the use of nuclear weapons on its territory raises very, very big doubts.
        On the one hand, the carrier of nuclear weapons will be destroyed, on the other hand, nuclear weapons will be used on their own territory, this is especially true of the S-25 complex, because it stood only around Moscow, and there the territory was populated to the limit and the range of the air defense missile system was too small. The latest modification is 43 km max range.
        1. +2
          10 September 2021 17: 55
          “It raises very, very big doubts” - I had to choose between the damage from the use of our own low-power nuclear charges and the damage from the nuclear bombs of an adversary of much higher power and dropped on Moscow. By the way, the explosion of a nuclear missile warhead could well disable both the enemy's electronics and his own. And here the question arises - who will be worse?
          1. 0
            11 September 2021 08: 03
            In general, in those days when the main striking force was aviation and the opponents planned to beat right and left with a nuclear club, such a measure was justified. It is better to get a small radioactive contamination on its territory, something may be hit by the factors accompanying the explosion, but with a very high probability an aircraft or a group of aircraft carrying nuclear weapons will not pass.
            Gradually times changed and similar weapons were removed from the troops, warheads were deactivated.
          2. 0
            23 September 2021 17: 46
            The Adversary, as you called him, during the 50s-60s. The aviation component was considered the core of the nuclear triad. And at the same time, He had a significant number of carriers of nuclear weapons of the B-52 type and others. In order to "unload the queue" of bombers in a massive air defense raid of the USSR as a queuing system and armed with special. ammunition.
            the Americans, having learned about this, changed the formation of the air force in the raid. That, as you know, greatly simplified the "queue maintenance" by the air defense system. But we had guided missiles with restrictions on sectors and launch lines, as far as I remember. Correct me if I am confused.
    2. -17
      8 September 2021 18: 56
      This nonsense is purely American, moreover, nonsense from the beginning and end.
      1. +10
        8 September 2021 19: 27
        And what about missiles for the S-75 complex with a nuclear warhead?
        1. 0
          10 September 2021 16: 41
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          And what about missiles for the S-75 complex with a nuclear warhead?

          Very simple. He himself served on the C-75M3. Incl. he walked as a commander, where one of the objects of protection was the building No. 7A ("Granite"), in which three 5V29 missiles were kept, with special warheads. I don't remember exactly the power of the charge (0,5-1,5 kt). But I remember exactly the restriction on the minimum application height - 5 km. The radius of guaranteed damage is about 1,5 km.
      2. +16
        8 September 2021 20: 54
        This nonsense is purely American, moreover, nonsense from the beginning and end.


        La-250 "Anaconda" - Soviet fighter-interceptor Lavochkin. 1956 year.
        Armament - two radio-controlled air-to-air missiles suspended under the wing of the aircraft: a 275 missile guided by a beam, or a 277 missile with a homing head and a conventional warhead, or a 279 missile with a nuclear warhead.
        What did you say about nonsense?
        1. 0
          8 September 2021 21: 35
          There is no information that the Soviet Air Force was armed with air-to-air missiles with a nuclear warhead ...
          1. +6
            8 September 2021 21: 39
            Sorry, I did not specify that the missile was being developed, but did not enter service. About nonsense does it change something?
            1. 0
              8 September 2021 21: 51
              Decide for yourself ... The USSR Air Force did not have nuclear explosive missiles ... The US Air Force was armed with 2 types!
              1. +7
                8 September 2021 22: 07
                Yes, everything has been decided for a long time.
                The USSR Air Force did not have nuclear explosive missiles in service.

                Exclusively due to late development, and not increased pacifism. While they were creating it, it became irrelevant.
              2. +6
                9 September 2021 01: 07
                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                Decide for yourself ... The USSR Air Force did not have nuclear explosive missiles ... The US Air Force was armed with 2 types!

                What does it change? The USSR Air Defense Forces were armed with approximately 2000 anti-aircraft missiles with "special" warheads intended for the S-25, S-75, S-125, S-200 air defense systems and the S-300P family.
                1. +9
                  9 September 2021 01: 15
                  "The enemy's anti-aircraft guns brutally fired at our planes peacefully throwing bombs on their city!"
                  Hello, Sergey! Did you have good time? I don’t know how it happened, but in the last month (corrected, about a month I bent, more likely 2-3 weeks) the quality of articles on VO managed to fall even lower, although it would seem that the bottom was reached. Even keeping in mind that you were resting, I made this assessment. Just one rubbish without even a glimpse. Even Kaptsov's article came out much weaker than usual for him.
                  Of course there is an option that it seems to me that VO is not the same (it's in me). But maybe I'm right. request
                  1. +6
                    9 September 2021 02: 47
                    Quote: KKND
                    Hello, Sergey! Did you have good time?

                    Hey! We had a great rest!
                    Now I am preparing a report on the Kuril Islands. There will be two parts, one devoted to the trip itself and natural attractions, the second to our defense potential in the Kuril Islands.
                    Quote: KKND
                    Of course there is an option that it seems to me that VO is not the same (it's in me). But maybe I'm right.

                    It's not just you ... sad There are fewer really interesting and original articles. Even this publication "chews" on what has already been published before. request
                2. +1
                  9 September 2021 06: 50
                  Quote: Bongo
                  The USSR Air Defense Forces were armed with approximately 2000 anti-aircraft missiles with "special" warheads intended for the S-25, S-75, S-125, S-200 air defense systems and the S-300P family.

                  1. It was about VV missiles, I talked about VV missiles ... if we were talking about missiles, I would also talk about them ... 2. In the USA, the Nike Hercules and Bomark air defense systems with nuclear missiles were in service .. 3. I agree with the listed types of Soviet "nuclear" air defense systems, basically ...
                  As for the special warheads for the S-300 air defense missile systems. Here the data varies greatly. There are many sources, including very serious ones, which claim that there was such a missile defense system - 5V55S. At the same time, many authors, in imitation of Wikipedia, indicate its far border of the affected zone of 47 km. This alone causes distrust of such information. The S-75 air defense system, when using the passive flight section of the rocket, had a distant border of 56 km, the missile for the S-300PT / PS 5V55R - 90 km, and the 5V55S based on it only 47? Why would you step back? Moreover, at this time, 48N6 with a range of 150 km and 48N6E2 with a range of 200 km were already in service. This is on the one hand, and on the other, the date of putting into service is 1992. But at this time, almost all the S-75 air defense systems were already deprived of the 15D, 5V29 special missiles, and the S-200 were rather energetically freed from the 5V28N. Why would it be necessary to adopt not the most perfect, but vigorous missile?

                  I believe that the information that 5В55С existed only in the drawings is more reliable. Even though on some forums you can find information that someone even saw it in positions
                  1. +4
                    9 September 2021 10: 02
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    As for the special warheads for the S-300 air defense missile systems. Here the data varies greatly. There are many sources, including very serious ones, which claim that there was such a missile defense system - 5V55S. At the same time, many authors, in imitation of Wikipedia, indicate its far border of the affected zone of 47 km. This alone causes distrust of such information. The S-75 air defense system, when using the passive flight section of the rocket, had a distant border of 56 km, the missile for the S-300PT / PS 5V55R - 90 km, and the 5V55S based on it only 47? Why would you step back? Moreover, at this time, 48N6 with a range of 150 km and 48N6E2 with a range of 200 km were already in service. This is on the one hand, and on the other, the date of putting into service is 1992. But at this time, almost all the S-75 air defense systems were already deprived of the 15D, 5V29 special missiles, and the S-200 were rather energetically freed from the 5V28N. Why would it be necessary to adopt not the most perfect, but vigorous missile?


                    Vladimir, we are a little confused. A firing range of 47 km had a 5V55K / KD missile defense system with a radio command guidance system used as part of the first modification of the S-300PT air defense system. For the modernized towed S-300PT-1 and the "self-propelled" S-300PS, 5V55R missiles with a range of 75 km and 5V55RM missiles with a range of 90 km have been developed. These missiles have already used "radio command guidance of the second kind" (with sighting through the missile). Missiles of the 48N6 family with a semi-active seeker are used on the S-300PM and S-400.
                    "Special" 5V55S missiles with guidance similar to 5V55KD were released a little. Apparently, the S-300PM and S-400 ammunition does not contain missiles with nuclear warheads.
                3. -2
                  10 September 2021 16: 42
                  Quote: Bongo
                  The USSR Air Defense Forces were armed with approximately 2000 anti-aircraft missiles with "special" warheads intended for the S-25, S-75, S-125, S-200 air defense systems and the S-300P family.

                  The S-125, as far as I remember, was not equipped with missiles with special warheads.
                  And so - yes. He himself served on the C-75M3, were in our battalion 5B29 ...
                  1. +1
                    11 September 2021 03: 14
                    Quote: Al_lexx
                    The S-125, as far as I remember, was not equipped with missiles with special warheads.

                    Equipped, moreover, a mode of firing at ground targets was provided.
                4. 0
                  10 September 2021 18: 01
                  This is the first time I hear about missiles with a nuclear warhead for the S-125. The launch position is too small for this complex.
                  1. -1
                    11 September 2021 02: 20
                    Quote: Sergey Valov
                    The launch position is too small for this complex.

                    It's not even so much the range as the altitude. The S-125 was sharpened specifically for low-flying, maneuvering targets. Type of cruise missiles (including anti -arab missiles), breakthrough FB-111 and others like them. And the special warheads have a restriction on the minimum height of detonation, so as not to comb their own hair. Therefore, a special warhead for the S-125 is like a saddle for a cow.
                    1. 0
                      11 September 2021 09: 21
                      I served on the S-125
        2. 0
          9 September 2021 06: 16
          Specify, the 279 rocket was mass-produced and was in service ???
        3. 0
          23 September 2021 17: 48
          The word "Fool" may well refer to the uncontrollability of a nuclear-powered rocket warhead!
      3. +4
        9 September 2021 02: 40
        Look at the years of development. In those days, nuclear weapons in the opinion. military theorists should be in every company, not just in the form of missiles on interceptor aircraft. And it was that they had that with us.
        So in the United States, the Davy Crockett recoilless gun was developed. And they made as many as 2100 units.
        Something like bumped into a platoon strongpoint, shied away nuclear weapons and went on.
        The understanding of the natural stupidity of this project came much later. After a long study of the effects of the application.
    3. +3
      8 September 2021 19: 08
      Quote: Ros 56
      Either I didn’t understand something, or how such nonsense could have occurred to someone to shoot down a bomber over his own head with a nuclear missile. He already brought you a vigorous gift.

      Initial conditions:
      Then the rocket had no gsn.
      An uncontrollable fool, if you fill it with explosives with destructive elements, then there will be no effective defeat of the target.
      Further, there is a leap of genius thought, since ordinary explosives are not enough, then it is necessary to use a powerful "explosive" - ​​nuclear warheads.

      At that time, both the USA and the USSR perceived tactical charges as a continuation of a number of conventional ammunition, but of much higher power.
    4. 0
      8 September 2021 19: 44
      Designer Chelomey proposed a project of an anti-aircraft missile with a nuclear warhead. To shoot down the same enemy. There were plenty of clever people in the Union and in the United States. Ours, however, did not even build in iron.
      1. +5
        8 September 2021 20: 57
        And they did and were in service with the troops.
    5. +1
      9 September 2021 15: 40
      Above the head of the Canadians)) and then, that small part that lives in the north of Canada.
    6. +1
      9 September 2021 20: 41
      Quote: Ros 56
      Either I didn’t understand something, or how such nonsense could have occurred to someone, to shoot down a bomber over his own head with a nuclear missile.
      This is the solution to the battlebox problem. If Hitler had a couple of such missiles (one - during the day, for US bombers, the second - at night, for the British), then he would have stopped allied air raids for at least a year (although the power is small, many could have survived). As for the explosion, 1.5 kT at an altitude of 5-10 km is better (the range, respectively, is even greater) than 20 kT at an altitude of 200 m directly overhead.
    7. 0
      14 October 2021 15: 31
      Why overhead? It was planned to shoot down the bombers in the Arctic zone, 400-500 km from the continent.
      Airplane routes from Europe run over Iceland, Greenland and Canadian Nunavut
  3. +7
    8 September 2021 19: 34
    “Right under the epicenter of the explosion” - dear author, these people were not under the epicenter, but IN THE EPICENTER. Look up the meaning of this term in the dictionary.
    1. -3
      8 September 2021 19: 41
      The explosion took place at an altitude of 5300 m. There was the epicenter. The officers were from him and below him at the same distance. What's wrong?
      1. +8
        8 September 2021 20: 38
        Epicenter (from the Greek ἐπι "over-, pri-" + Latin centrum "center") is a perpendicular projection of the central point of the focus of an explosion or earthquake on the Earth's surface (compare the hypocenter). The event can be underground (underwater) or aboveground.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. -4
    8 September 2021 19: 43
    The article is excellent, easy to read. Probably we also had something similar, but well, this is NATO, and over its territory.
  6. +9
    8 September 2021 20: 08
    Reassembled aircraft

    Reassembly has nothing to do with the creation of aircraft.
    Tu-4 was created by reverse engineering.
    1. +4
      8 September 2021 20: 48
      the big problem was converting inches to millimeters
      1. +3
        8 September 2021 22: 26
        Quote: novel xnumx
        the big problem was converting inches to millimeters

        In the absence of documentation, the parts were measured with Soviet instruments close to modern SI.
        1. -4
          9 September 2021 06: 34
          Explain on your fingers to the dull ones what kind of instruments close to SI are. belay
          1. +3
            9 September 2021 09: 31
            The Soviet system of units was metric, but in some units it differed from the international SI adopted today. So instead of Newtons, kilogram-forces were used and so on.
            1. -1
              9 September 2021 13: 15
              Well, any sixth grader in the USSR knew the SI system, I thought you meant something else. And what have the tools to do with it?
              1. +2
                9 September 2021 13: 20
                And in what units were Soviet instruments measured? Inches pounds? We measured the details of B 29 and did not need to translate anything.
                1. 0
                  9 September 2021 13: 58
                  Wrong comrade, there were so many measurements to be made that you couldn't stock up on tools. So they measured in millimeters and their fractions and counted.
                  Mal-mal gave an error, instead of hurray, the guard shouted, of course they measured it in inches and translated into millimeters. tongue
                  1. 0
                    14 October 2021 15: 36
                    The thickness of the aluminum sheet for covering the Tu4 hull could not be chosen exactly. Tupolev personally reported to Stalin, and Stalin allowed the use of the Soviet tax, the closest in thickness.
                    All instruments on the first series were in miles and feet. The pilots put pieces of paper with a metric scale next to the device.
      2. +4
        9 September 2021 00: 37
        Converting inches to millimeters is easy. The recalculation of the strength characteristics of parts in relation to domestic alloys and domestic rolled products has become a serious problem.
  7. +3
    8 September 2021 20: 50
    I don't remember ... is this the second or third appearance of "jenie" on page-x VO?
    1. +4
      9 September 2021 01: 08
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      I don't remember ... is this the second or third appearance of "jenie" on page-x VO?

      https://topwar.ru/105307-sistema-pvo-severnoy-ameriki-chast-1.html
  8. +2
    8 September 2021 21: 47
    1. In addition to the AIR-2A "Janie" rocket, there is a mention of the AIR-2B "Super Janie" ... Perhaps this is the AIR-2A "Janie" rocket with an upgraded engine ... 2. In addition to "Janie" there was another explosive missile with a nuclear warhead in service with the US Air Force ... This is the AIM-26 FALCON controlled RVV ...
  9. +2
    8 September 2021 21: 59
    An interesting solution to compensate for the lack of accuracy of the ammunition.
  10. +2
    8 September 2021 22: 56
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    There is no information that the Soviet Air Force was armed with air-to-air missiles with a nuclear warhead ...

    In terms of warhead size, only 2 missiles could theoretically be equipped with nuclear warheads - R-40 and R-33.
    A small charge could be useful when firing at thermonuclear missiles.
  11. +1
    9 September 2021 15: 41
    Quote: Egor53
    This nonsense is purely American, moreover, nonsense from the beginning and end.

    Justify, please, in more detail. And then like a blank shot in the air.
  12. +1
    9 September 2021 15: 43
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    Decide for yourself ... The USSR Air Force did not have nuclear explosive missiles ... The US Air Force was armed with 2 types!

    There were, you just do not know. I tell you from 100 percent. accuracy.
  13. +1
    10 September 2021 16: 34
    Author, check your figures. If in 2 seconds the engine accelerated the rocket to 3.3M, then to what cosmic speeds did it accelerate it in the full 12 seconds of its operation ?!
    Even Wikipedia disagrees with you. And talks about 3.3M in 12 seconds. And the detonation of a warhead with a fuse in time.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"