The US press believes that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia

47

By withdrawing troops from Afghanistan, the United States is freeing up resources to strengthen its opposition to China. And all the problems that the Afghan situation creates for the region, Beijing and Moscow will have to deal with independently, without the participation of the West.

This is evidenced by an article in the American newspaper The Wall Street Journal.



The US press believes that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia. For Moscow and Beijing, according to the publication, in this situation there will be more disadvantages than advantages.

Actually, at the first moment they did not immediately understand that now they had new big problems. The withdrawal of the US contingent from Afghanistan was reacted by some Chinese and Russian media with gloating and jubilant comments, soon replaced by more sober and alarming speculations. Along with the joy of America's shameful failure, it became clear that the United States was not the only loser.

Russia quickly realized that Moscow had reason to fear for the safety of its Central Asian allies, whose territories are directly adjacent to Afghanistan. And the point here is not even the ally duty of our country, but the fact that if radicalism penetrates Central Asia, it can carry with it a terrorist threat to Russia.
  • The US Department of Defense
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    2 September 2021 12: 39
    I agree, retreating, you tire the advancing smile
    1. -3
      2 September 2021 12: 58
      These are superficial judgments of the American rag, just part of a smokescreen to hide the fact that with the departure of the Americans, the political legitimization and rehabilitation of the Taliban is taking place! Neither ISIS, nor Al-Qaeda, other radical Islamic projects defeated the United States, but then they won back Afghanistan to the full and forced them to reckon with them ... It's like in the 90s in Russia - from a bandit, he became a successful businessman, and then also a deputy! He was a murderer and rapist, but suddenly he became a "respected and decent" man! laughing
      1. 0
        2 September 2021 13: 33
        Quote: Finches
        He was a murderer and rapist, but suddenly he became a "respected and decent" person!

        In the Wild West, it was. Nothing has changed. Are you surprised?
        Or are there no such examples in our post-revolutionary history?
        Which of the revolutionaries do not take - all white and fluffy? Yes?
        1. -1
          2 September 2021 13: 41
          In general, your parallels correspond to reality, with the exception of the difference in motives that underlie the actions of bandits and revolutionaries!
          1. +1
            2 September 2021 13: 55
            So it is now: the United States carries everything only light and good, and whoever does not understand the States has the wrong motives. laughing
            The difference in interpretations always smiled at me:
            - a successful armed coup is a revolution,
            - a failed armed coup - a mutiny. bully
            1. 0
              2 September 2021 14: 02
              Yes, I'm not so much about this, but about the personal motives of a person!
              1. 0
                2 September 2021 14: 10
                This muddy water is personal motives.
                What were the VIL's motives when he said: "we will go the other way"?
                Was he going to fight for our happiness?
                Or avenge your brother? Or something else?
                Who will answer now?
                Winners write history. No other is given.
                1. 0
                  2 September 2021 14: 14
                  But you cannot deny that there were idealist revolutionaries who sacredly believed and "we will die as one fighting for this"!
                  1. 0
                    2 September 2021 14: 23
                    I cannot deny that there are stories about such revolutionaries. Personally, I am not familiar with them.
                    1. 0
                      2 September 2021 14: 25
                      You can describe it like that! Nevertheless! There are definitely no idealist bandits.
                      1. 0
                        2 September 2021 14: 38
                        Robin Hood is said to have given money to the poor.
                        And then, who knows how everything was ...
                      2. 0
                        2 September 2021 14: 57
                        Then he is a revolutionary! laughing
                      3. +1
                        2 September 2021 14: 58
                        Quote: Finches
                        Then he is a revolutionary!

                        drinks
                  2. 0
                    3 September 2021 10: 53
                    Quote: Finches
                    You cannot deny that there were idealist revolutionaries who sacredly believed and "we will die as one
                    You, in turn, will not deny that there were materialist revolutionaries who were not going to die for anyone, but wanted to cash in on a sinful deed and get power and impunity for personal use.
                    1. 0
                      3 September 2021 10: 57
                      But these are no longer revolutionaries, but bandits disguising themselves as them! hi
                      1. 0
                        3 September 2021 11: 17
                        Quote: Finches
                        But these are no longer revolutionaries, but bandits disguising themselves as them! hi
                        The slogan "Rob the loot!" attracts mostly bandits. For the failed bandits masquerading as the intelligentsia, it sounds like "the expropriation of the expropriators." Among them, of course, there are idealists who then wanted and want to expropriate them in order to distribute to others, but there are never many of them.
                      2. 0
                        3 September 2021 11: 23
                        The revolution is not done in white gloves or according to Carlyle "Every revolution is conceived by romantics, carried out by fanatics, and inveterate scoundrels use its fruits"
                      3. 0
                        3 September 2021 11: 39
                        Quote: Finches
                        according to Carlyle "Every revolution is conceived by romantics, carried out by fanatics, and inveterate scoundrels use its fruits"
                        At the end of the 18th century. and so it was (taking into account the fact that among fanatics not all are white and fluffy). At the beginning of the 20th century. inveterate scoundrels have already been actively involved in the process of implementation (you will definitely see them among the participants in the February revolution), and today they can conceive, implement and use the fruits of color revolutions. Technology does not stand still: before, the computer was used by engineers, but today everything is in a row. hi
    2. 0
      2 September 2021 13: 30
      Quote: Thrall
      I agree, retreating, you tire the advancing

      How American is it to scare a hedgehog with his bare booty ... laughing
      1. +1
        2 September 2021 14: 00
        Quote: Alex777
        How American is it to scare a hedgehog with a bare booty

        They think to hide behind a "puddle", but no, on September 11, 2001, the "puddle" did not become an obstacle ...

        And to wish problems to others - as it is in the state, as it is "democratic".
        1. 0
          2 September 2021 14: 06
          Quote: Serg Koma
          They think to hide behind a "puddle", but no, on September 11, 2001, the "puddle" did not become an obstacle ...

          100500% The States arranged it themselves. So that Bush has a reason to knock everyone out for the war.
          Think for yourself: the attack took place at 8-30, when there were ~ 4000 people in the buildings.
          An hour later there would have been 40. Strange terrorists?
          Jackie Chan was supposed to be shooting on the roof that day, but "accidentally" everything was transferred ... That's how lucky ...
          On the third day, the deputy chairman of the KGB Kz told me that it was a provocation. Therefore, no one has sued the Saudis (supposedly organizers) in the United States until now.
          It is not profitable for anyone to attract attention once again. hi
          1. +2
            2 September 2021 19: 41
            Quote: Serg Koma
            On September 11, 2001, the "puddle" did not become an obstacle.

            It was actually a CIA operation.
            As a result of this operation, not counting (no one gave the exact figure) the tons of gold that were brought to the bank in the safe of the skyscraper, and after the terrorist attack the safe turned out to be empty, the CIA was able to greatly increase its funding
            1. 0
              2 September 2021 21: 48
              tons of gold, which were brought to the bank in the safe of a skyscraper, and after the terrorist attack, the safe turned out to be empty, the CIA was very much able to increase its funding

              Tons of gold are bullshit.
              1) The buildings still needed demolition, like they were stuffed to the eyeballs with asbestos. Tenant compensation, demolition, new building - Lieberman, the owner, had to go broke. Instead, big billions in insurance. Fuckers pay.
              2) In the building that collapsed without Boeing, all the investigative materials on the robbed and devastated Enron were kept. Ends into the water for tens of billions.
  2. +7
    2 September 2021 12: 40
    The US press believes that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia

    Yes, yes, even if they get rid of everywhere and create even more problems for China and Russia. No one mind
  3. -1
    2 September 2021 12: 44
    Just a killer article, about nothing.
    1. +2
      2 September 2021 14: 40
      Write a good article. We will read it with interest. hi
  4. +1
    2 September 2021 12: 44
    Russia quickly realized that Moscow had reason to fear for the safety of its Central Asian allies, whose territories are directly adjacent to Afghanistan.

    In Russia, literally a couple of years after the invasion of the so-called. The "coalitions" in Afghanistan are well aware that its presence does not bring anything good either to the region or to Russia. And the shameful flight (and this is not output, as the author writes), will not add calmness either.

    The author of the WSJ just "forgot" to write that Russia is highly likely to blame for everything. Well, what would have been, as always.
  5. 0
    2 September 2021 12: 45
    The bearded people with China will have one problem - the Chinese language. It is difficult to understand the cooperation agreement. It's easier with us, not everyone left.
  6. +1
    2 September 2021 12: 46
    We are not about ... fox, this is a tactical heap under the door of Russia!
    1. 0
      2 September 2021 13: 41
      There is the French style, there is English, and this is American: come, shit and go.
  7. 0
    2 September 2021 12: 49
    For what it was all started.
  8. +1
    2 September 2021 12: 49
    The US press believes that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia
    There is no joy, special, but no one will tear hairs in different places. There is a lot, a lot of difficult WORK!
  9. +6
    2 September 2021 13: 05
    Someone will explain to me why, before the arrival of the Amers, we were not sad, and after their departure we should sprinkle ashes on our heads?
    1. +1
      2 September 2021 13: 14
      Quote: sabakina
      and after they leave

      Poppy fields were left unattended! what
    2. 0
      2 September 2021 13: 19
      Welcome soldier
      Different experts, different opinions .... there is also such that while the Yankees were driving in Afghanistan, for us, the neighbors, there was a relatively comfortable situation, with the exception of drug trafficking, of course. But this, the situation is familiar, no surprises and serious conflicts ... only small-town friction. Although, the problem, the trouble, this is a serious one, one must be aware of this.
      After the flight of the Yankees, the situation is not stable, as it seems to many, and they are afraid of the spread of the conflict outside, beyond the border of that country.
      In general, a lot is not clear, unpredictable.
  10. 0
    2 September 2021 13: 06
    By withdrawing troops from Afghanistan, the United States is freeing up resources to strengthen its opposition to China. And all the problems that the Afghan situation creates for the region, Beijing and Moscow will have to deal with independently, without the participation of the West.

    The phrase is somewhat incomplete. The redistribution of US funds in favor of the Taliban will bring tangible problems to China and Russia.
    The Taliban will now have a lot of problems, but if they are helped to correct their actions ......................
  11. +2
    2 September 2021 13: 12
    In recent years, the American press has been cheating against a certain axis of evil in the person of Russia and China, and now there is such an opportunity to write off your shame on a grandiose strategic plan.
    They should have added that it is also against Iran. laughing
  12. -1
    2 September 2021 13: 13
    The US press believes that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia. For Moscow and Beijing, according to the publication, in this situation there will be more disadvantages than advantages.

    Just like in the old joke:
    But ... uh ...
    But ... uh ...
    But you can't write on the wall
  13. 0
    2 September 2021 13: 17
    The US press believes that the American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia

    Judging by the amount of weapons left in Afghanistan, the CIA has a "plan B". Moreover, against the background of the "shameful flight" hype, the CIA and the NSA did not appear anywhere, and there are no complaints about them in the White House.
    1. 0
      3 September 2021 01: 01
      Quote: askort154
      Judging by the amount of weapons left in Afghanistan, the CIA has a "plan B".

      they left it not to the Taliban, but to Ghani. plan B was about the fact that their puppet with their weapons awakens there to project their influence. the fact that we see this is already a plan C - "we have not crumpled, this is such a way to defend ourselves from enemies!" wassat
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +1
    2 September 2021 13: 31
    That's right, you can no longer be afraid of a cruise missile strike from Afghanistan.
  16. +1
    2 September 2021 13: 32
    Liked: "a blow to China and Russia" !!!
    Our "Freedom-loving" non-brothers even have a saying that explains what happened:
    "Us.r..u in harem pants do not hai (let) them stink"! Also with the states, they themselves have done well and in the world the stench "hurts your eyes."
  17. +1
    2 September 2021 14: 59
    that American withdrawal from Afghanistan will deal a blow to China and Russia

    Another "peremoga" of the American military, they learned from the Independent.
    As a child, there was a saying - "If only we would give them if they caught up with us."
  18. 0
    2 September 2021 16: 49
    It is foolish to deny that after the withdrawal of the Americans from Afghanistan, a new threat appeared on the borders of our Central Asian allies and not far from our borders ...
    1. 0
      3 September 2021 01: 05
      Quote: Cympak
      a new threat has emerged near our borders ...

      and she definitely appeared? is it really a threat to us? our embassy, ​​unlike the western ones, is working. the Taliban announced any territorial claims? maybe invaded somewhere? or is it the same bullshit as stories about massacres? while the Americans killed more than the Taliban during the evacuation ...
  19. 0
    2 September 2021 18: 02
    And what do we actually care about the US press. In the US itself, who reads what they write in Russia?
  20. 0
    2 September 2021 22: 04
    Tex, the so-called "US press" where is Billy's proof?
    For publication you need links to the press.
    If published in a shtatovskaya yellow rag, then there is a question for the VO moderators.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"