Military Review

US bases in Europe received a ban on the purchase of Russian energy

66



American bases in Europe have been banned from purchasing Russian energy resources. Earlier, representatives of the United States Department of Defense demanded a ban on the purchase of energy from Russia for its military facilities in Europe. The publication of the relevant document in the Federal Register is scheduled for August 30.

The purpose of the document is called - the implementation of the position from the Pentagon's defense budget for the 2020 financial year. The states explained that the ban is aimed at maintaining the stability of energy security in Europe, and also that the ban applies to all types of energy resources (gas, coal, oil, oil products, etc.).

The United States defense department also noted that exceptions would be possible and pointed to the possibility of concluding contracts with those bases that are more related to Asia than Europe (with a hint of parts of the American units in Turkey).

According to the data, US military facilities are located on the territory of Turkey, including Incirlik airbase, which stores tactical nuclear weapon States. Washington cannot afford a lack of resources on the ground to ensure the nuclear security of the region and the United States in particular. However, local residents fear accidents involving nuclear warheads and regularly call for the closure of the airbase.
Author:
Photos used:
Twitter / United States Air Force Central Command
66 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. Cron
      Cron 28 August 2021 11: 48
      +21
      Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
      I also want to add that Gazprom will most likely be forced to sell Nord Stream 2.

      Why would it suddenly be forced? They will drive gas to half the capacity, what's the problem?
      He lost the trial in Dusseldorf.

      Still, Gazprom would have won important decisions in the help and manual courts of Europe
      1. Free wind
        Free wind 28 August 2021 13: 01
        -24
        Gazprom's lawyers have a level of training at the level of a student of the 8th grade. Start a game with Ukraine without reading the contract? It's cool, of course. Well, of course, they flew in at 12 billion. Well, the services of banks for transfers between accounts.
        1. Cron
          Cron 28 August 2021 13: 07
          +14
          Quote: Free Wind
          Gazprom's lawyers have a level of training at the level of a student of the 8th grade. Start a game with Ukraine without reading the contract? It's cool, of course. Well, of course, they flew in at 12 billion. Well, the services of banks for transfers between accounts.

          Firstly, no one started any game with Ukraine, the game itself came to them, if you are not aware.
          Secondly, have you yourself read these contracts in order to talk so boldly about someone's preparation?
          Thirdly, how can you not fly in if the court assumes the right to change the terms of the contract?
        2. hrych
          hrych 28 August 2021 13: 29
          +12
          Quote: Free Wind
          Gazprom's lawyers have a level of training at the level of a student of the 8th grade

          How to say. https://24tv.ua/ru/naftogaz_otzyvaet_iski_protiv_gazproma_na_12_milliardov_dollarov_stoit_li_iskat_izmenu_n1263892
          By Friday, gas prices in Europe returned to the level of $ 580 per 1 cubic meters after falling by almost $ 100 at the end of last week.
          Meanwhile, Fortuna is left with less than 7,5 kilometers of pipe and the Golden Joint.
        3. akarfoxhound
          akarfoxhound 28 August 2021 13: 35
          +7
          You spoke with the Ukrainian troll. Don't wait for an answer
        4. boris epstein
          boris epstein 28 August 2021 16: 05
          +8
          The contract with Ukraine is drawn up on a download or pay basis. Russia pumps at least 12 billion cubic meters a year, paying for the pumping of 40 billion cubic meters. After the completion of the Turkish Stream, the rest of the volumes went there. But Ukraine has lost more than it gained - lost the opportunity of the so-called "reverse" - with the tacit consent of the EU to pump out part of the gas paid by the EU. And 12 billion cubic meters per year is not enough to fill gas storage facilities plus domestic consumption current prices. Today it is $ 550 per 1000 cubic meters. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has already issued a warning about massive rolling blackouts of electricity, about disconnecting residents with debt for housing and communal services and cities with debts for gas from gas supplies, while Russia is more than compensating for the losses from the Ukrainian contract with income from the current gas price. that it is precisely Ukrainian lawyers, economists and politicians who play at the level of the 4th grade of the school for the mentally disabled.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. SKVichyakow
        SKVichyakow 28 August 2021 16: 20
        -1
        And I will add to what you said, and the price of gas in Europe will be at a high level, and constantly.
    2. Brturin
      Brturin 28 August 2021 11: 53
      +15
      Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
      He lost the trial in Dusseldorf.

      Land court, there is a possible appeal to the federal, but for now ...
      the company stopped offering gas on the ETP (Electronic Trading Platforms) with delivery in the first quarter of 2022 and for the whole of 2022 ... the changes in contracts took place an hour after the publication of the decision of the German court, which refused to exempt Nord Stream 2 from the norms of the EU gas directive ... https://www.interfax.ru/business/787000

      contracts will be fulfilled, but additional volumes ... prices, prices ..
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 28 August 2021 12: 06
        +10
        At the same time, Russia is the second country in terms of the volume of petroleum product supplies to the United States. Basically, M100 fuel oil, which remains after our refining. What do our oilmen do? If the Americans make everything from our fuel oil, both gasoline and diesel fuel and kerosene. There are millions of tons of fuel oil in our country. This is waste. Technology cannot be bought or stolen. am
        1. Brturin
          Brturin 28 August 2021 12: 18
          +12
          There were also other opinions about the purchase.
          But as luck would have it, there are not so many substitutes in the world for the heavy and super-heavy Merey oil produced in Venezuela. I have already said about light and light oil, it is not suitable (only gasoline and kerosene can be driven out of it, everything below it - diesel fuel and fuel oil only from dark heavy oil). But not all of them are suitable for heavy oils either. For example, Brazilian oil of the Marlim brand, Mexican Maya, Canadian Bow River and Iraqi Basra Heavy are not suitable because of their high sulfur content relative to Merey. Reconfiguring the cracking process existing at American refineries for these types of oil is billions and billions of dollars (0,5 billion for each cracking column) ... And then, oh, horror, the eyes of American oil bosses turned ... to Russia. Only the Russian export oil of the Urals brand in terms of its sulfur content could still save our sworn “friends and partners”. And I have a feeling that I saved. https://topcor.ru/6986-venesujelskij-proval-ssha-amerikancy-vynuzhdeny-zakupat-neft-v-rossii.html
          1. The black
            The black 28 August 2021 12: 32
            +12
            I also want to add that Gazprom will most likely be forced to sell Nord Stream 2. It lost the trial in Dusseldorf.

            The court's decision means that Gazprom, I quote, “will be forced to distribute the pipeline's capacity at an auction, which may lead to a further delay in deliveries”. Those. gas will be bought from Gazprom by another operator and pumped through the same pipe. Question: is it profitable for Europe, to have an intermediary as well? ... There are still win-win options for Gazprom, but I will not expand on this, not the topic.
            1. Vladimir Mashkov
              Vladimir Mashkov 28 August 2021 12: 46
              +4
              On the topic of the article.
              These offended Americans are funny! Politics at the level of kindergarten: "In spite of my grandmother, I will frostbite ears!" Well, or: "In spite of the conductor I'll buy a ticket and go on foot!" laughing laughing laughing
              1. fruc
                fruc 28 August 2021 14: 53
                +4
                They do not want to buy, well, they don’t need to. Is it written on gasoline from whose oil it is made in Europe: from Russian or Iraqi.
            2. Brturin
              Brturin 28 August 2021 12: 49
              +4
              Quote: Black
              There are still no-lose options for Gazprom, but I will not expand on it, not the topic.

              Options, options ... here one of these days one more ... but while the auctions are going on ... wait ... now the certification of the gas pipeline itself ...
              Rosneft asks to allow it to export 10 billion cubic meters of gas a year to Europe and is ready to pay an increased level of mineral extraction tax for these volumes. We are not talking about canceling Gazprom's export monopoly and changing legislation. Rosneft wants to sign an agreement with the monopoly, according to which Gazprom will act as an agent for the oil company's gas exports ... In 2017, Rosneft signed a memorandum with BP on the possibility of supplying 10 billion cubic meters of gas per year to Europe. Additional budget revenues - that is, the difference between the "increased" export mineral extraction tax of Rosneft and the current mineral extraction tax of Gazprom - will amount to 37 billion rubles. per year https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4958411
            3. alch3mist
              alch3mist 28 August 2021 21: 58
              0
              The court's decision means that Gazprom, I quote, “will be forced to distribute the pipeline's capacity at an auction, which may lead to a further delay in deliveries”. Those. gas will be bought from Gazprom by another operator and pumped through the same pipe. Question: is it profitable for Europe, to have an intermediary as well? ... There are still win-win options for Gazprom, but I will not expand on this, not the topic.

              Why is dad not a mediator? He's probably already rubbing his hands ...
          2. Free wind
            Free wind 28 August 2021 12: 50
            -10
            So our fuels are of poor quality precisely because of their high sulfur content.
            1. Brturin
              Brturin 28 August 2021 12: 55
              +4
              But the states buy it ... and how many people, so many opinions ...
            2. VORON538
              VORON538 28 August 2021 16: 33
              -1
              You have fuel in Ukraine from Belarus and Russia
              Where did you get yours? What did you buy? So they didn’t buy theirs, and they begged for money to buy it. lol
        2. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 28 August 2021 12: 50
          -11
          Quote: tralflot1832
          At the same time, Russia is the second country in terms of the volume of petroleum product supplies to the United States. Basically, M100 fuel oil, which remains after our refining. What do our oilmen do? If the Americans make everything from our fuel oil, both gasoline and diesel fuel and kerosene. There are millions of tons of fuel oil in our country. This is waste. Technology cannot be bought or stolen.

          It is commendable that you start to reason well.
          The so-called large "business" in the Russian Federation is not geared towards investments; the only principle of "quick money" or the principle of a hapk works. One can argue for a long time about the "gas station", but if you look at the structure of the mining block, you can understand that even the raw materials do not belong to us / the people, and such giants of the Soviet industry as "nornickel" are already by% in foreign jurisdictions.
          Even housing and communal services, which can be considered as mining, are more than 90% owned by offshore companies.
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 28 August 2021 14: 28
            +6
            Razacharuya. The capitalists from the USSR got the killed oil refining. With 60% of processing. One Tuapse refinery is worth what, survived the war. The communists are great, they built modern refineries in the fraternal republics. The youngest we have, one, the Achinsk refinery, was put into operation in 1982. .Capitalists had to invest billions to raise refining to 74%. And they will have to invest more, which they are happy to do. good
            1. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 28 August 2021 23: 21
              -2
              Quote: tralflot1832
              The capitalists had to invest billions to raise processing to 74%, and they will have to invest more, which they are happy to do.

              Funny laughing Musyo, and you are not only a fan of edrosni, but also an ardent anti-Soviet! belay
              1. tralflot1832
                tralflot1832 28 August 2021 23: 52
                +3
                And there is nothing more to say if this is the case with the oil industry. And who to vote for? The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is definitely not included in this list.
        3. Grits
          Grits 29 August 2021 04: 47
          0
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Their recycling rate reaches 96, and we have millions of tons of fuel oil waste.

          And what, then, to heat the boiler rooms? gasoline? winked
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 29 August 2021 06: 11
            +1
            We have this fuel oil, like shoe polish in a shoe polish factory, which we export for post-production and remains for the whole season. I would like the processing to rise to at least 85% in the industry, this is too costly business. Not the whole process is modernized, but only a small part of it.
    3. URAL72
      URAL72 28 August 2021 12: 00
      +10
      He a priori could not win - politics. But the decision was only about limiting supplies by one operator to 50% of capacity. According to the law, only Gazprom can pipe gas for export. Yesterday I read that Rosneft requested an amendment to the law as an exception, in order to pump 2 billion cubic meters a year via SP-10 itself. I think this is a theatrical performance for Europe to get around the restrictions. Of course they will. And gas will go to US bases through third parties. They will buy gas from BMW or Maserati, depending on where the bases are.
      1. WIKI
        WIKI 28 August 2021 13: 38
        -4
        Quote: URAL72
        Yesterday I read that Rosneft requested an amendment to the law as an exception, in order to pump 2 billion cubic meters a year via SP-10 itself. I think this is a theatrical performance for Europe to get around the restrictions.

        "The limitation of the capacity of Nord Stream 2, associated with the effect of the updated EU gas directive, can be circumvented only if Gazprom sells the pipeline." Therefore, we are not talking about gas, but about a pipe.
    4. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 28 August 2021 12: 03
      +14
      This only means that Gazprom will sell less gas to Europe, but at a higher price ... True, until Europe gets tired of putting a spoke in the wheels of its most profitable supplier.
      1. private person
        private person 28 August 2021 12: 52
        -12
        This only means that Gazprom will sell less gas to Europe, but at a higher price.

        Everything will be the same as before, effective managers of Gazprom will receive just as much less money will go to the country's budget.
        1. Roma 1977
          Roma 1977 28 August 2021 13: 01
          +12
          World gas prices are breaking records. This means that with a lower volume of pumping, profits will be higher.
          1. private person
            private person 28 August 2021 14: 45
            -6
            This means that with a lower volume of pumping, profits will be higher.
            It was not easy that this tax was introduced in gayroop. They will compensate for their losses at the expense of SP-2,
            1. Brturin
              Brturin 28 August 2021 16: 43
              +1
              And what theoretically prevents Russia from finding such EU products on which the same tax can be imposed ... the volumes may not be the same, but the principle
              1. tralflot1832
                tralflot1832 28 August 2021 17: 01
                +1
                That is why Putin VV will most likely take part in a video conference in Glasgow. And he will be asked about forests that utilize CO2. And then the rear-wheel drive all harmful production from themselves and now want to make money out of thin air!
      2. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 28 August 2021 12: 56
        -7
        Quote: Roma-1977
        This only means that Gazprom will sell less gas to Europe, but at a higher price ... True, until Europe gets tired of putting a spoke in the wheels of its most profitable supplier.

        As a consumer, all bases in Europe are such a scanty% of the total supply, which is not worth talking about at all.
    5. Prisoner
      Prisoner 28 August 2021 12: 13
      +1
      "Buy your jigsaw machines with discounts on AliExpress." (C) laughing
    6. Prjanik
      Prjanik 28 August 2021 12: 24
      +7
      AND? They will supply 2 times less gas, but at 2 times the price. And the Sumerotransit is in any way kirdyk after 24 years, now while the minimum capacity under the contract is being pumped. My will, I would only drive expensive lng to geyrope, do not waste resources for a penny, and without parasitic transit, well, everything goes to that
    7. Andobor
      Andobor 28 August 2021 12: 46
      +4
      Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
      He lost the trial in Dusseldorf.

      It's just that Dusseldorf will buy gas at twice the price,
      Knowing the Dusseldorf people, I am sure that they will come up with something.
    8. lis-ik
      lis-ik 28 August 2021 13: 20
      -2
      Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
      I also want to add that Gazprom will most likely be forced to sell Nord Stream 2. It lost the trial in Dusseldorf.

      It would be a blessing for Russia in general if everyone would give up energy resources. Maybe then all the trash from the country would have dumped and the real sector would have to be developed.
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 28 August 2021 13: 22
        -6
        Quote: lis-ik
        maybe then all the trash from the country would have dumped

        You run the risk of being left without guidance at all levels in one day. wassat
        1. lis-ik
          lis-ik 28 August 2021 16: 44
          -2
          Quote: Stroporez
          Quote: lis-ik
          maybe then all the trash from the country would have dumped

          You run the risk of being left without guidance at all levels in one day. wassat

          We will get rid of parasites at the top, they are real pests.
    9. Thrifty
      Thrifty 28 August 2021 13: 28
      +3
      Alexander A pseudonym - if Gazprom has enough intelligence, they will create a company laying, give a piece of pipe for rent, but all conditions will be unstable so that the company does not really want more from Gazprom. Look, even you will be hired as the owner of such a company for good money ...
    10. boris epstein
      boris epstein 28 August 2021 15: 49
      +2
      At the moment, we are talking only about the ownership by Germany of that part of Nord Stream-2, which is made up of the money invested by Germany. But Russia has an option - to give part of the pumped volumes to Rosneft. Here is an independent transit country for you. Then everything will be respected and the income will go to the Russian treasury.
    11. VORON538
      VORON538 28 August 2021 16: 26
      0
      Also tell me that your Ukraine is in debt for three kopecks wassat
      The eternal dream of ukroholopov is to do nothing and have more money for it. lol
  2. knn54
    knn54 28 August 2021 11: 43
    +4
    Let them install windmills and solar panels, if the area of ​​the base allows.
    Plus biogas plants.
    1. Cat Alexandrovich
      Cat Alexandrovich 28 August 2021 11: 57
      +2
      Biogas plants - in the sense of what kind of energy to extract from the American? So how many of these kakah have to be successfully rolled out, that there was enough energy for everything! The medals will be awarded to the foremost workers of this production!
      1. boris epstein
        boris epstein 28 August 2021 16: 14
        +1
        No, just switch their feeding to self-sufficiency - feed them beans and peas and collect the exhaust.
    2. HAM
      HAM 28 August 2021 12: 00
      +4
      "One Indian in a tent will freeze surely ..... two Indians will never ..."
      1. URAL72
        URAL72 28 August 2021 12: 16
        +4

        Not such an important client, these bases. The main thing Kiev has sharply increased the purchases of valerian in Russia.
  3. From Tomsk
    From Tomsk 28 August 2021 11: 57
    +4
    But the United States itself continues to buy heavy oil from Russia at an accelerated pace. Where to go?
    1. Grits
      Grits 29 August 2021 04: 59
      0
      Quote: From Tomsk
      But the United States itself continues to buy heavy oil from Russia at an accelerated pace.

      The terrible molecules of the dictatorship began to poison the free people ...
  4. Roma 1977
    Roma 1977 28 August 2021 12: 00
    +3
    Huh? Will they buy "non-Russian" products from Slovakia? How is Ukraine?
  5. Prisoner
    Prisoner 28 August 2021 12: 15
    +2
    winked The American soldiers will have to study the experience of their Ukrainian comrades in "non-purchase" of Russian energy resources. laughing
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 August 2021 12: 28
    +5
    the ban is aimed at maintaining the stability of energy security in Europe
    I'm interested in something else. Let's say an American base in Germany. Isn't the supply of the same gas coming from the Germans? So they buy from the Germans and most likely Russian. Or will the Americans install their own gas tank at every base in Europe and fill it exclusively with their own democratic gas? Okay, whatever the child doesn’t amuse himself, as long as it doesn’t play with matches.
    1. Grits
      Grits 29 August 2021 05: 04
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      I'm interested in something else. Let's say an American base in Germany. Isn't the supply of the same gas coming from the Germans? So they buy from the Germans and most likely Russian. Or will the Americans install their own gas tank at every base in Europe and fill it exclusively with their own democratic gas?

      It's just some kind of logistics holiday! Especially for the American bases in Germany at the entrance to the bases, the pipeline valve will be tightened (the gas is Russian). Then they drive the gas carrier from the USA to the terminal, reload it, take it to the gas carriers to the bases, where it is pumped to the gas storage facilities newly built near the bases (which is a great joy for potential DRGs). And what - the amers' denekh is like a fool's self-siege - will still be printed.
  7. AlexVas44
    AlexVas44 28 August 2021 12: 45
    -1
    Quote: BrTurin
    Only the Russian export oil of the Urals brand in terms of its sulfur content could still save our sworn “friends and partners”. And I have a feeling that I saved.

    Can we really be proud? Our oil savior ?! I am proud, but the sediment ...
  8. sen
    sen 28 August 2021 12: 47
    +1
    There is a ban in the United States on the use of Chinese microelectronics and nevertheless they use it. So it will be with Russian energy resources. How Ukraine buys allegedly European gas.
  9. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 28 August 2021 13: 01
    +1
    Considering the mess that is going on at the Pentagon, the logisticians will quietly buy Russian gas, and according to the documents, it will pass as expensive American gas. This is a klondike and a gold mine !!! )))
  10. Igor Mamaev
    Igor Mamaev 28 August 2021 13: 21
    +7
    Gazprom has stopped selling gas for 2022 from today. Prices have reached historic highs. Thanks to the "fair consideration" in Dusseldorf.
  11. 7 poplar
    7 poplar 28 August 2021 14: 32
    +1
    and it pleases!
  12. evgen1221
    evgen1221 28 August 2021 15: 08
    +3
    Yeah, got it. We are looking forward to an increase in amerskih tankers for transshipment at sea from our tankers.
  13. Alexander Pseudonym
    Alexander Pseudonym 28 August 2021 18: 38
    -4
    Quote: akarfoxhound
    Who are you answering? This "it" here has Banderzian propaganda in all articles, at least a little bit concerning the homeland of puppies.
    It is unclear why the administrators will not define this miracle in a lifelong ban, because the proboscis jumper is here not because of a dispute, but for trolling crap. And you, gentlemen, are being fooled all the time. It doesn’t answer, didn’t notice ???

    I inform you that I have filed a complaint against you. You write boorishly.
    1. alch3mist
      alch3mist 28 August 2021 22: 06
      +2
      Alexander Nickname (Alexander) Today, 18:38
      I inform you that I have filed a complaint against you. You write boorishly.

      Could you clarify: actually, "write" is an imperative verb. That is, this demand write boorishly ???
  14. Alexander Pseudonym
    Alexander Pseudonym 28 August 2021 18: 39
    -3
    Quote: lis-ik
    Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
    I also want to add that Gazprom will most likely be forced to sell Nord Stream 2. It lost the trial in Dusseldorf.

    It would be a blessing for Russia in general if everyone would give up energy resources. Maybe then all the trash from the country would have dumped and the real sector would have to be developed.

    It is reasonable!
  15. Alexander Pseudonym
    Alexander Pseudonym 28 August 2021 18: 41
    -3
    Quote: Thrifty
    Alexander A pseudonym - if Gazprom has enough intelligence, they will create a company laying, give a piece of pipe for rent, but all conditions will be unstable so that the company does not really want more from Gazprom. Look, even you will be hired as the owner of such a company for good money ...

    no one will hire me, unfortunately. There are many who wish.
    Can you try?
  16. Alexander Pseudonym
    Alexander Pseudonym 28 August 2021 18: 42
    -4
    Quote: VORON538
    Also tell me that your Ukraine is in debt for three kopecks wassat
    The eternal dream of ukroholopov is to do nothing and have more money for it. lol

    I'm from Russia. The fact that Russia completely in vain feeds everyone in a row I agree.
  17. Alexander Pseudonym
    Alexander Pseudonym 28 August 2021 22: 24
    -4
    Quote: alch3mist
    Alexander Nickname (Alexander) Today, 18:38
    I inform you that I have filed a complaint against you. You write boorishly.

    Could you clarify: actually, "write" is an imperative verb. That is, this demand write boorishly ???

    I was wrong in one letter
    1. 41st region
      41st region 29 August 2021 06: 48
      +1
      That is enough.
      Looks like a raven in flight, and a red fellow - in snot.