ZRPK "Pantsir-SM / S1M" and its potential

59

Serial ZRPK "Pantsir-S1" of one of the combat units of the Russian army. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Last year, the Russian industry for the first time showed the promising Pantsir-SM anti-aircraft missile-gun system. It was also announced the creation of its export modification called "Pantsir-S1M". In the near future, it was planned to conduct all the necessary tests and then sign contracts for the supply of such equipment to the Russian army and foreign countries. It was planned to attract the attention of old and new customers by increasing the main characteristics.

For the army and for the market


Work on the further improvement of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system, aimed at increasing the main parameters, became known back in the mid-tenths. Then it was reported that the modernized complex will receive new electronic means and an improved missile, which will increase the detection and destruction range, as well as the likelihood of intercepting targets.



The ready-made Pantsir-SM complex was first shown at the Army-2019 forum. Last year, at the Victory Parade, such an air defense missile system was demonstrated in a modified configuration and with a new weapons... The achieved capabilities and tactical and technical characteristics were also announced. It was reported that in the coming years, the ZRPK will pass all the necessary checks and will be adopted by the Russian army.

Within the framework of the Army-2020 forum, it became known about the imminent start of sales of new air defense missile systems to foreign countries. The Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation reported that back in 2019, several foreign armies showed interest in the export Pantsir-S1M. Moreover, demonstration firing was carried out for them in closed mode.

As a result of these events, the FSMTC was expected to receive real orders for new equipment. In addition, several requests were received regarding the possibility of upgrading the export "Pantsir-C1" to the state of "C1M". The organization-developer of the complex worked on this topic.


Pantsir-SM at Army-2020. Photo by Rostec

The export plans of the Russian industry are beginning to be fulfilled. On August 24, Rosoboronexport announced that pre-contract work on Pantsir-S1M is currently underway with more than 10 potential buyers. These are mainly the countries of the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region.

The very next day, on August 25, Rosoboronexport announced the conclusion of the first export contract for the modernized air defense missile system. At the same time, the customer country, the volumes of planned deliveries, the cost of products and other features of the agreement have not yet been disclosed.

Areas of modernization


In its basic configuration, Pantsir-S1 (E) is a short-range mobile land-based air defense missile system capable of detecting and hitting air targets at ranges up to 20 km and altitudes up to 15 km. The aim of the Pantsir-SM / S1M modernization project was to improve the main tactical and technical characteristics and obtain new combat capabilities. Such tasks were solved by replacing part of the elements of the complex, incl. means of destruction.

According to the results of the modernization carried out, "Pantsir-SM" is able to notice earlier various aerodynamic targets of different classes, as well as attack and hit them at increased distances. Due to the improvement of electronic equipment and weapons, an effective fight is ensured both with aircraft or aviation means of destruction, and with small-sized UAVs.

The general architecture of the modernized air defense missile system remains the same. A compatible four-axle chassis or trailer accommodates a large container with all fixed assets and assemblies, incl. with a rotating turret equipped with radar, cannons and launchers. At the same time, the composition of the equipment of the Russian "Pantsir-SM" and the export "Pantsir-S1M" differs significantly.


"Pantsir-SM" (foreground) with new weapons and serial "Pantsir-C1" (rear) on Red Square, June 24, 2020. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense

During the modernization, the standard radars were replaced. The SM project uses a new detection station capable of detecting an air target (EPR not specified) at a distance of 75 km. The new tracking and guidance station, located between the cannons and launchers, provides targets for operation at ranges up to 40 km and altitudes up to 18 km. The block of optoelectronic equipment for observation and guidance has been modernized.

The updated air defense missile system for the Russian army retains the ability to use two-stage bicaliber short-range anti-aircraft missiles 57E6E. With the help of radio command guidance, such a product can hit targets at ranges up to 20 km and altitudes up to 15 km. Also, a new SAM has been developed with a range of 40 km and an altitude of 18 km. The two launchers still carry up to 12 missiles. The artillery unit has not changed and includes a pair of 2A38M double-barreled cannons with 1400 rounds of ammunition.

Last year, "Pantsiri-SM" was demonstrated with a reduced composition of the "main" missiles: the upper extreme positions on the launchers were given over to blocks of small-sized missiles. As reported, a small-sized light missile defense system with a range of 20 km has been developed specifically for the Pantsir-SM. With its help, it is proposed to destroy small targets for which other missiles are redundant. In place of one "large" rocket, a container with four lightweight ones is placed.

The Army-2021 demonstrates the Pantsir-S1M complex, which has significant differences from the previously shown SM product. So, instead of a new detection radar, a product of the old 1PC1-1E model is used. In addition, only TPK "full-size" missiles are mounted on the launchers. Probably, the export appearance of the complex does not provide for bringing the detection range to 70-75 km and expanding combat capabilities in the near zone. At the same time, "Pantsir-S1M" can use a new missile defense system with a range of 40 km.

Way to the troops


According to the latest reports, "Pantsir-SM" is still undergoing the necessary tests, but in the near future the army will decide the issue of adopting it. Apparently, the new modification of the air defense missile system will supplement and then replace the existing vehicles in the troops. Due to this, important objects of civil and military infrastructure will receive more effective protection against all modern threats.


Export "Pantsir-S1M". The machine simultaneously has the features of the "C1" and "SM" complexes. Photo by Rosoboronexport

The situation with the export modification "Pantsir-S1M" looks no less interesting. It is reported about negotiations with a dozen foreign countries, one of which has already placed an order for the supply of equipment. Apparently, new contracts will follow soon. It is curious that they can provide for both the supply of new production combat vehicles, and deep modernization of existing products - depending on the wishes and capabilities of the customer.

Current events fully confirm the assumptions of past years. From the very beginning, it was believed that the modernized version of the complex would interest foreign armies and would definitely find its place on the market. Such forecasts, among other things, were based on the commercial success of the base "Pantsir-C1".

To date, export ZRPK Pantsir-S1E have been delivered to eight foreign countries. In addition, one of the foreign customers re-exported such equipment to Libya. Russian-made complexes are actively used in several current conflicts and clearly demonstrate their capabilities. In all situations, an effective solution to the assigned tasks is ensured - it can only be hindered by the use of ammunition or gross calculation errors.

It should be assumed that foreign countries that already have an export "Pantsir-S1" in one or another version, will want to purchase and modernized "S1M". In addition, following their example, other countries interested in improving their air defense can also acquire a new air defense system.

Modernity and prospects


The development of the Pantsir line of anti-aircraft missile-gun systems continues and constantly leads to new interesting results. New modifications of equipment appear with certain innovations intended for deliveries to the Russian army or abroad. In the near future, two new versions of the ZRPK will reach mass production at once and will go to the troops.

Thus, "Pantsir" once again confirms the existence of a solid modernization potential, and the industry is actively using it - both in the interests of its own armed forces and for making money on the international market. The desired results have already been achieved in both directions, and it is clear that these trends will continue in the future.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    27 August 2021 04: 21
    The good news is that in this segment of the production of air defense systems, Russia will not be dependent on partners. As for modernization, if initially the potential is great, then here "the edges are not visible."
    1. 0
      27 August 2021 05: 09
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The good news is that in this segment of the production of air defense systems, Russia will not be dependent on partners.

      As with most others.
    2. 0
      27 August 2021 07: 48
      Quote: ROSS 42
      As for modernization, if initially the potential is great, then here "the edges are not visible."

      But what kind of modernization is this?
      The radar is different, the missiles are different, the chassis is different, the OELS is different .... there are only guns left from the old Shell.
      This is a completely new complex.
      1. -1
        27 August 2021 14: 47
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        But what kind of modernization is this?
        The radar is different, the missiles are different, the chassis is different, the OELS is different .... there are only guns left from the old Shell.
        This is a completely new complex.

        You have already completely swung. They will simply add a couple of additional tubes for short-range missiles, where there will be a network in the place of the warhead. They will catch UAVs. Here is the upgrade.
    3. +3
      27 August 2021 10: 45
      Yes, let it be partially dependent on Belarus, and what? Fine. Butka will not be able to play giveaways in the EU now. I got the Strogach.
      1. +3
        28 August 2021 17: 32
        It won't come out now, but tomorrow it will come out, we know we've already passed.
  2. +1
    27 August 2021 07: 46
    Do "nails" have a range of the same 20 km as normal missiles? It seems they wrote that it is much less.
    1. -1
      27 August 2021 08: 31
      These missiles do not exist yet, R&D is underway. Therefore, there are no their parameters.
    2. +3
      27 August 2021 10: 49
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      Do "nails" have a range of the same 20 km as normal missiles? It seems they wrote that it is much less.

      The author seems to be skidding around corners! Missiles with a "caliber" of 57-60 mm will not be able to fly 20 km! In the articles, data on a range of 3-5 km "flashed" ... I can still, in an extreme case (!), "Agree" to 10 km, but nothing more! Also, the Author has strangeness in reasoning about the radar and missiles with a range of up to 40 km in the Pantsir-S1M complex! What about "Pantsiru-S1M" "forty-kilometer" missiles, if it does not have a "seventy-kilometer" radar? Yes, and "thirty-kilometer" zurs with an old radar with a detection range of 36 km, how to use it effectively? request Well, Pantsir-S1M should not remain with the "old" radar with a detection range of 36 km!
      1. -1
        27 August 2021 13: 34
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Yes, and "thirty-kilometer" zurs with an old radar with a detection range of 36 km, how to use it effectively?

        in pursuit
        1. +3
          27 August 2021 13: 58
          Quote: Tamer
          Yes, and "thirty-kilometer" zurs with an old radar with a detection range of 36 km, how to use it effectively?

          in pursuit

          This is what the present "gifted" generation means! The answer is on the move (!), Without even thinking, but will anyone "live" to shoot "after" ?! belay
          1. -2
            27 August 2021 14: 04
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            Quote: Tamer
            Yes, and "thirty-kilometer" zurs with an old radar with a detection range of 36 km, how to use it effectively?

            in pursuit

            This is what the present "gifted" generation means! The answer is on the move (!), Without even thinking, but will anyone "live" to shoot "after" ?! belay

            in some cases, for some members of your generation, sometimes it is "better to chew than talk" (c)
            Are you thinking exclusively of the "Shell - plane / rocket" duel?
            1. +2
              27 August 2021 14: 19
              Quote: Tamer
              Are you thinking exclusively of the "Shell - plane / rocket" duel?

              Well, We have at least some thoughts ... unlike you!
      2. +2
        27 August 2021 13: 58
        About why "Pantsir" needs missiles with a range of 40 km, there was a comment from the developer that such a range is achieved due to the increased energy and acceleration characteristics of the missile, but the increased range is not a goal, the goal is to increase the rate of fire: a faster missile intercepts the target faster , freeing the guidance channel for the next launch.
        1. +1
          27 August 2021 20: 33
          Quote: Cympak
          there was a comment from the developer that such a range is achieved due to the increased energy and acceleration characteristics of the rocket, but the increased range is not a goal, the goal is to increase the rate of fire: a faster rocket intercepts the target faster, freeing up the guidance channel for the next

          Well ... your arguments are quite reasonable (!) ... all the more so, once I participated in a forum with a similar topic ... only there they discussed zur 48N6 ... In many ways it is worth agreeing with you; but not in everything ! There are nuances! Currently, UAVs have become enemy number 1 for the military ... Various means are being developed, sought, tested ... The question is posed: can the "Pantsir" become an effective "anti-drone" complex !? Most of the existing UAVs are not yet very high-speed and maneuverable targets! This means that the "Pantsir" zur can hit a drone at a relatively low speed and at a distance exceeding the range of destruction of high-speed targets (airplanes, VP missiles ...). In addition, a radar complex will always come in handy, the target detection range of which is much greater than the flight range of the zur; since The further the calculation detects targets, the more time the missilemen will have to analyze the operational situation and the distribution of air targets! Also ... more "long-range", which means more powerful radar turns out to be more anti-jamming! So, I just cannot agree that for a "thirty-kilometer" ... "forty-kilometer" zur, a radar with a range of 36 km is sufficient!
      3. +1
        27 August 2021 21: 57
        I do not know who and why put you minuses - but from me plus.
        1. -1
          27 August 2021 23: 06
          Thank you for your understanding. And about the "minuses" - so this is a familiar thing ... Recently, there are so many "minus players" on the VO, which minus everything that "moves" (that is, everything that appears on the pages of the VO), that try to write the formula (2x2 = 4) - minus!
      4. -1
        4 October 2021 12: 07
        small rockets don't need to fly far. A goal worthy of them is noticed much later due to the vanishingly small EPR and other factors, but the characteristic "quantity simultaneously fired targets. "After all, they (enemies) want to use swarms of drones and shoot at them either with BOVs (which do not exist yet), or the ideology of the" iron dome "- at a cheap rocket to the target and then 48 rackets per vehicle are already quite good, especially if they - "shells" - are able to automatically disassemble sectors and targets for shelling
  3. 0
    27 August 2021 10: 43
    It is strange that for military air defense they do not put a shell on a goose, but they use the already frankly outdated Tunguska.
    And P.S. KAMAZ chassis is not the best choice for this vehicle. This Tornado will have a center of gravity even higher than that of 6560, which has been tumbling around the country for a long time.
    As well as with the fool, adopted for service without passing all the tests (especially military), the KAMAZ-65225 tractor - drive into the field and sat down in a moment.

    1. Hog
      +4
      27 August 2021 11: 20
      The Pantsir-SM combat module itself has become less overall, and the chassis height has become less than 3100mm (Kamaz-53958) versus 3520mm (Kamaz-6560), so the center of gravity will be clearly lower, and much more (which means stability will be better).
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        29 August 2021 18: 45
        But, as it were, a huge armored cabin will carry this center of gravity up
        1. Hog
          +1
          29 August 2021 21: 56
          Quote: Togilen
          But, as it were, a huge armored cabin will carry this center of gravity up

          Here it is, it turns out that the usual Pantsir-S cabin is not armored.
          Photos for comparison.

          1. 0
            30 August 2021 09: 21
            Do you keep in touch with your head or just blurt out? Look at the base, which has become longer, like the car itself, look at the cabin in which, in addition to being longer than the ZILovskaya (do you remember who KAMAZ created?), There is also a compartment with cooling radiators behind. One thing only pleases that in front of the bridges are located humanly, and not raskaryachku like 6560 idiotic.
            Damn advisor!
            1. Hog
              +1
              30 August 2021 11: 54
              Have you tried to open your eyes?
              Does Pantsir-S behind the KAMAZ cabin (there have been nothing from ZIL for a long time) has another cabin for the crew of the combat module (which is just not in the CM version) or have you forgotten about it (in total, these two are more new on the CM)? The instrument compartment with radiators was simply moved from the stern of the combat module to the front, and due to a slightly longer base (due to the stern overhang), more space was freed up (for the same box with spare parts), and the combat module itself was moved closer to the stern.
              The change in the distance between wheels 2 and 3 is related to the overall changes in distance in each of pairs 1,2 and 3,4.
              PS: I hope you won't make me laugh anymore.
    2. +4
      27 August 2021 12: 02
      Goose means more weight, more fuel consumption. The shells still cannot shoot on the move, and therefore they are not suitable for escorting tank units on the march over rough terrain.
      To say that the Tunguska are outdated, but this is so to itself. Not a single potential enemy has in his arsenal a little bit close to her. They also cover the tank units of the TOP air defense missile system.
      1. +5
        27 August 2021 13: 30
        Quote: PROXOR
        The shells still cannot shoot on the move, and therefore they are not suitable for escorting tank units on the march over rough terrain.

        Duc ... when the developer was making a complex of object air defense for the air defense forces of the country, he could not even dream in a nightmare that this complex could be forced to accompany tank columns smile
        1. 0
          27 August 2021 15: 28
          It is still suitable for the concept of network-centric warfare, but the developers say they are still holding back.
    3. +5
      27 August 2021 12: 09
      So the Shell refers not to military, but to object air defense, everything is on wheels there. Troops are pine, torus, beech, s-300vm, all on tracks
    4. +2
      27 August 2021 13: 39
      There is a variant of the Armor on a tracked chassis, and it was presented to the public 10 years ago, if not more smile
    5. 0
      28 August 2021 17: 34
      In fact, they bet on Vityaz-30PM
    6. 0
      30 August 2021 13: 17
      The new KAMAZ, it seems, should have an independent suspension ... ... the center of gravity is lower
    7. -1
      3 September 2021 03: 54
      Quote: Togilen
      It's strange that for military air defense they don't put a shell on a goose ...

      Pantsir-SM-SV on a new tracked chassis:
      bastion-karpenko.ru/pancir-sm-sv-zrpk/
  4. +2
    27 August 2021 11: 02
    Of course ... you can speculate about the performance characteristics of the Pantsir-S1M / SM 'air defense system ... But! 1. Who can tell me how many modifications of the missile defense system exist for the Pantsir air defense system? 2. What methods are used to increase the range of missiles in the Pantsir air defense system while maintaining the same weight and dimensions? Here is a person who is versed in these data, can "sensibly" talk about the performance characteristics of "Pantsir" ...
    1. -3
      27 August 2021 14: 08
      The problem is that the bicaliber scheme and guidance methods do not allow you to effectively hit maneuvering targets at long distances and from a large angle. "Carapace" is designed to intercept direct / low-maneuverable targets with a near-zero angle
      1. +1
        27 August 2021 14: 23
        Quote: Cympak
        The problem is that the bicaliber scheme and guidance methods do not allow you to effectively hit maneuvering targets at long distances and from a large angle.

        How is it ? belay How did the "bicaliber scheme" get in the way? request
        1. -3
          27 August 2021 18: 35
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          Quote: Cympak
          The problem is that the bicaliber scheme and guidance methods do not allow you to effectively hit maneuvering targets at long distances and from a large angle.

          How is it ? belay How did the "bicaliber scheme" get in the way? request

          Impossible to realize 2-mode solid state motor
          1. +1
            27 August 2021 19: 24
            Quote: Cympak
            Impossible to realize 2-mode solid state motor

            You are wrong ! You need to study the "materiel" more and better ... Then you will be ready to argue! It's still early ...
      2. -1
        3 September 2021 04: 42
        Quote: Cympak
        The problem is that the bicaliber scheme and guidance methods do not allow you to effectively hit maneuvering targets at long distances and from a large angle.

        wassat
        there is a radar module with an active phased array (AFAR) SOTs (RLM - 1RS1-4), the radar detects the target both in the process of additional search for the central control unit from the TsVS, and in the autonomous search mode, automatic target tracking and transmission of control commands to the missile board.

        what is this about the scales about the "guidance methods"?
        arguments, Cympaklaughing
        1. -1
          3 September 2021 16: 37
          In the case of the "Pantsir" missile defense system, ignorance is carried out either by the method of three points, or by the method of half straightening. This limits the capabilities of the air defense missile system to engage maneuvering targets and targets with a large heading angle.
          The question is, why did you save on the proportional aiming method? I assume that due to the design of the missile defense system.
  5. 0
    27 August 2021 21: 59
    The new chassis is kind of wider than the old one - stability should be better. Why don't they use the chassis from the MLRS Hurricane - is it too big and heavy? But stable and lifting.
    1. 0
      27 August 2021 22: 02
      Tornado and not Hurricane - it has a larger chassis.
    2. +1
      30 August 2021 13: 21
      A hurricane is not an oversized vehicle .... The shell is a mobile machine and it can be transported by rail, by air, etc. and a resource like a civilian truck.
  6. 0
    27 August 2021 22: 43
    A compatible four-axle chassis or trailer accommodates a large container with all fixed assets and assemblies

    So KAMAZ or Baz?
    1. 0
      31 August 2021 09: 42
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      A compatible four-axle chassis or trailer accommodates a large container with all fixed assets and assemblies

      So KAMAZ or Baz?

      "Remdizel"
      http://www.remdizel.com/voennaya-tekhnika/mashiny-semeystva-tornado/

      https://topwar.ru/159474-pancir-sm-i-ego-vozmozhnosti.html
  7. 0
    30 August 2021 13: 19
    Maybe some other booking for operators? Anti radar missiles mainly with fragmentation warhead ...
  8. 0
    20 September 2021 23: 29
    "Pantsir" is a good complex with great potential for modernization. But I personally do not like the KAMAZ base. In particular, if the "Pantsir" covers the S-400 and is almost included in the staff of divisions, which would be logical, then it is more practical to use a BAZ as a chassis, which has a wider track (better stability) and the ability to use the same spare parts.
    In addition, the combat mass of the "Pantsir" of the first modifications reached 34 tons, and for the armored one it already amounts to over 40 tons, which is comparable to the mass of the T-72.
    Obviously, the increase in the combat mass of the air defense missile system limits its maneuverability and maneuverability, which will affect the combat use.
  9. 0
    26 September 2021 22: 35
    18 km in height ... It's hard to even imagine. Such a little one and ... In fact, a verdict on any NATO aircraft. They do not fly higher, and we only have MIG-31.
    Constructors are good fellows!
  10. 0
    20 October 2021 18: 02
    Can I put it on a boat (like a boat)?
    Commercial air defense will be able to "run" along the rivers and above them will no longer fly low.
  11. 0
    3 November 2021 01: 02
    This is just awesome niche for ROE! And they are lazy: {
  12. 0
    10 November 2021 23: 16
    First of all, it is necessary to equip our armed forces with new air defense missile systems and only after that start delivering them for export, and with us, unfortunately, the opposite is often the case !!!
  13. 0
    20 November 2021 18: 28
    During the modernization, the standard radars were replaced. The "SM" project uses a new detection station capable of detecting an air target (EPR not specified) at a distance of 75 km.

    - Oh, what a pity that "it is not specified"! lol
    1. +1
      5 January 2022 19: 52
      Quote: Outsider
      During the modernization, the standard radars were replaced. The "SM" project uses a new detection station capable of detecting an air target (EPR not specified) at a distance of 75 km.

      - Oh, what a pity that "it is not specified"! lol

      "Pantsir-M" ("Palitsa"), the radar architecture of which is represented by a multifunctional radar with a 1PC2-1E "Helmet" phased array of millimeter wave (Ka), and the optoelectronic one - a 10ES1-E sighting device capable of detecting and "locking" targets to the exact auto tracking in optical and infrared channels. The "Helmet" radar "captures" targets with an RCS of 0,1 m2 (PRLR AGM-88 HARM) at a distance of 12-13 km, and OLPK 10ES1-E at a distance of 14 km. The last modification of the radar with afar, performance characteristics is much better.
  14. +1
    5 December 2021 11: 50
    In the program "Military Acceptance", the editorial drone could not be shot down from the cannons, only the rocket coped. Is it too expensive to missile a penny drone?
    1. 0
      5 January 2022 22: 17
      Quote: Sergey M._2
      In the program "Military Acceptance", the editorial drone could not be shot down from the cannons, only the rocket coped. Is it too expensive to missile a penny drone?

      Sergey M. created four small-action ZUZs in one tube, just for the UAV.
  15. -1
    11 December 2021 13: 55
    The article is about nothing.
  16. 0
    5 January 2022 19: 00
    ZRPK Pantsir-SM / S1M is an export version of the ZRPK Pantsir-SM radar with afar.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"