Military Review

Betting on LCS in the South China Sea: on the advantages and disadvantages of coastal warships of the US Navy

22

On Monday, US Vice President Kamala Harris boarded the USS Tulsa in Singapore. This visit immediately drew attention to the ships of the class, which causes perhaps the most fierce debate about the appropriateness of its existence. We are talking about Littoral combat ship - coastal combat ships designed to perform a wide range of functions near the coast: cargo transportation, mine reconnaissance, providing special operations, protection from enemy submarines. Some experts believe such (littoral) ships are real weapons against China, others see them as a “floating problem”.


In the US Navy, the LCS is praised for its high speed and maneuverability. But critics are convinced that the ships are not very effective, as they have weak weapons and are prone to mechanical damage. As for Vice President Harris, it would be foolish to expect her to be well versed in coastal warships. Therefore, the speeches of the second person in the White House are based on what representatives of the US naval command say to her. The latter, in turn, are actively promoting ships of the LCS class.

The US Navy is convinced that the LCS will play a very important role in the future in providing protection against the Chinese threat in the South China Sea. Vice Admiral Bill Mertz, commander of the 7th fleet The United States until June, at the beginning of 2021, talked about plans to deploy up to eight LCS ships in the western Pacific Ocean, including four of them based in Singapore.

Naval commanders describe the LCS as ideal ships for the South China Sea. For example, they can enter smaller ports, which compares favorably with the destroyers of the US 7th Fleet. To increase the capabilities of the LCS, the US Navy has begun upgrading their firepower. Up to eight attack missiles are placed on board the ship.


However, many analysts are asking what exactly the coastal ships could do in the event of a naval conflict with the Chinese Navy. Now the Chinese fleet is developing very rapidly, and it is simply stupid to rely on the capabilities of eight coastal ships in a collision with the largest fleet in the world. Karl Schuster, an instructor at the University of Hawaii and a retired US Navy captain, said the LCS "won't last long" if faced with the Chinese Navy in combat.

Another expert, Blake Herzinger, finds it ludicrous to say that a large Chinese navy might be intimidated by a coastal ship with eight missiles. In addition, the analyst draws attention to the mechanical breakdowns of coastal ships, which limit the possibility of their deployment at the designated location. On the other hand, Herzinger acknowledges that the ship can be used to escort larger combat platforms such as destroyers or cruisers, as well as to demonstrate the very fact of the American presence. But these are auxiliary and symbolic tasks that cannot be compared with the independent conduct of hostilities at sea.

Siddharth Kaushal calls the LCS a "replacement" for the new frigates that were ordered by the US Navy in 2020 and are due to enter service in five years. However, only two ships have been ordered, and this, according to Herzinger, testifies to the very serious limitations of the combat and financial capabilities of the US Navy in the Pacific region. The American fleet can be called a “shrinking fleet,” Herzinger makes a disappointing forecast, and in this case it really remains to rely on the LCS, since the US Navy simply does not have anything else in this region.
Author:
Photos used:
Twitter/U.S. Navy
22 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. LifeIsGood
      LifeIsGood 26 August 2021 12: 51
      -5
      Before we had all sorts of Francophiles, Anglophiles, etc. Now I see the people have unanimously reoriented to China. laughing
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 26 August 2021 15: 04
        +1
        Quote: LifeIsGood
        Now I see the people have unanimously reoriented to China.

        The people see the results. And he doesn't care about who, but what matters is how? Mexico would have smelted hundreds of millions of tons of steel and built dozens of destroyers, just as Mexico would have been admired.
        Everything is seen especially well in comparison ...
      2. knn54
        knn54 26 August 2021 17: 40
        0
        Some admiral from the US Navy after his resignation, well, really wants to get a job in the military-industrial complex. Good salary and NO responsibilities. good industry order. IN THIS case, for coastal ships.
        And what breaks is not surprising. The equipment (in this case, the ships) is constantly becoming more complicated, but the qualifications of the service personnel (the level of training) are becoming weaker.
  2. APASUS
    APASUS 26 August 2021 12: 50
    +3
    It seems to me that the neutralization of such ships will cost China a penny. As an example:

    China has tested the system of salvo launch of a flock of kamikaze drones
    1. OgnennyiKotik
      OgnennyiKotik 26 August 2021 13: 01
      +2
      Quote: APASUS
      China has tested the system of salvo launch of a flock of kamikaze drones

      Everyone is testing them, this year the United States launched 1000 drones from the C-130. Now this is the main problem in providing air defense. Especially against this, in the new Constellation frigates, a place and 150 kW are reserved for a laser.
    2. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 26 August 2021 13: 10
      0
      Quote: APASUS
      It seems to me that the neutralization of such ships will cost China a penny. As an example:
      And you are right. Talk about the combat value of these ships in offensive operations ... fool Oh yes, in defensive operations to defend Taiwan. Closing Taiwan with your body requires larger ships feel lol
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 26 August 2021 15: 59
        0
        When the States developed these ships (and the LCS was created against China, IMHO), it never occurred to them how fast China would build up its fleet. hi
        PS And now the States have to come up with new concepts ...
  3. Avior
    Avior 26 August 2021 12: 52
    +2
    The Americans lack cheap and simple small frigates, in my opinion.
    Kind of like a modern version of Perry.
    Littoral ships do not replace them, too high price and complexity
    1. OgnennyiKotik
      OgnennyiKotik 26 August 2021 12: 58
      +2
      Quote: Avior
      The Americans lack cheap and simple small frigates, in my opinion.

      So they therefore ordered a Constellation (FREMM). LCS is more against China's mosquito fleet and support missions. A very niche ship.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 26 August 2021 13: 07
        +5
        LCS were ahead of their time.
        A tiny but very skilled team.
        And a strong air wing.
        With the ability to receive and launch the F-35B (after reinforcing the deck with steel sheet).
        It is difficult to recruit personnel on such ships.
        These are no longer sailors, but specialists with education.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 26 August 2021 13: 30
          +3
          Quote: voyaka uh
          LCS were ahead of their time.
          A tiny but very skilled team.
          And a strong air wing.

          All this is good, but USN ordered something completely different: a massive, cheap universal ship. And we got a glass cannon for the price of a diamond.
          And the concept "our only defense is the ability to defeat the enemy before he can hit us"It failed once again - as soon as even third world countries had SCRCs. Immediately, the lack of air defense, and alloy alloys in superstructures and hulls, and a complete lack of constructive protection came out. ijis ".
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 26 August 2021 14: 26
            +1
            You are right.
            The difficulty of choosing the "right ship" is due to the complete lack of ship-versus-ship combat practice in the world.
            If on land there are regional wars from time to time, where weapons are somehow checked, then at sea there is zero practice.
            Therefore, there is an eternal problem: are there many cheap ships or several strong and expensive ones?
            1. Doccor18
              Doccor18 26 August 2021 15: 10
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Therefore, there is an eternal problem: are there many cheap ships or several strong and expensive ones?

              It is ideal when a small number of expensive and strong people accompany many simple and cheap ones on a hike ...
      2. Avior
        Avior 26 August 2021 13: 15
        +1
        In my opinion, Constellation turned out to be expensive and, like LTS, have some specific features.
        I meant a classic, simple, inexpensive frigate, as an option, purchased on the side, from the Germans or the French
        Something like Formidebl
        1. OgnennyiKotik
          OgnennyiKotik 26 August 2021 13: 24
          +2
          Quote: Avior
          classic simple inexpensive frigate, as an option - purchased on the side

          In my opinion, FREMM just fits into these parameters. They need a lot of autonomy to work in the ocean zone.
          Quote: Avior
          Something like Formidebl

          In a displacement of 3-4, it is not a fact that full-fledged air defense and anti-aircraft weapons can fit + high autonomy, while the price is low. Perry is a very compromise ship.
          1. Avior
            Avior 26 August 2021 14: 30
            +1
            Great autonomy is not always needed, which in this case
            Formideble meets all the requirements - full-fledged air defense 32 Aster cells 30, 76 mm Otto Melara, full-fledged PLO, helicopter - all this is 3200 displacement with a range of 4200 miles and only 90 people, including the air group - and all the pleasure was less than 300 million apiece
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 26 August 2021 13: 32
      +3
      Quote: Avior
      The Americans lack cheap and simple small frigates, in my opinion.
      Kind of like a modern version of Perry.

      They are to blame - there was nothing to give up on FRs, considering that they could be replaced by LCS. smile
  4. Alexander Pseudonym
    Alexander Pseudonym 26 August 2021 13: 00
    -6
    Quote: LifeIsGood
    Before we had all sorts of Francophiles, Anglophiles, etc. Now I see the people have unanimously reoriented to China. laughing

    There are enough fools
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 26 August 2021 13: 08
      +2
      Talibanophiles also appeared ... laughing
  5. Tusv
    Tusv 26 August 2021 13: 02
    0
    I think the literals were invented for the pursuit of the USSR nuclear submarine as a marker. If so, then it will come in handy against the Chinese
  6. Castro Ruiz
    Castro Ruiz 26 August 2021 14: 20
    +1
    Eti LCS on the moem and I think the US Navy is also a dead end, since they voiced the program for the construction of Constellation frigates, which they had not built for a long time.