The Ministry of Defense signed a new contract for the supply of T-90M tanks

The Russian Defense Ministry signed a new contract for the supply of another batch to the troops tanks T-90M. This was reported by the press service of the military department.

Reportedly, within the framework of the Army-2021 forum, the Ministry of Defense and Uralvagonzavod signed a state contract for the supply of another batch of T-90M tanks to the troops. In addition, UVZ and the Ministry of Defense signed a contract to upgrade the T-90 battle tanks to the T-90M level. The parameters of the contacts have not yet been disclosed.

State contracts were signed for the supply of T-90M tanks and for the overhaul of T-90 tanks with modernization to the T-90M level

- said in a statement.

The T-90М tank was developed as part of the Breakthrough-3 development work and is a deep modernization of the T-90 with increased combat and operational characteristics.

In the course of modernization, a new tower module with a 90-mm cannon of increased survivability and accuracy is installed on the T-125M, as well as a remote-controlled machine-gun mount of 12,7 mm caliber. The new tank is equipped with a highly automated digital fire control system that provides search, recognition, auto-tracking and engagement of targets.

In addition, the T-90M tanks are equipped with the equipment of the unified tactical control system (ESU TZ).

The signing of new contracts for the supply of the T-90M and the modernization of the T-90 was previously announced by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Comments

[Bat]

Nice tank. I am from Azerbaijan, I know a guy who is a tanker and a T-90. Very positive feedback.

[Thrifty]

Firstly, where is our KAZ on it? After all, they promised to put it on the T90M! Secondly, ALL T90s need to be modernized in this way, and the promised KAZ should be delivered to them, since the T14, except for 4 pieces, was not supplied in part ...

[Roma 1977]

KAZ is an extremely specific unit. And it does not at all guarantee the "invulnerability" of the tank. There are too many nuances. I am not saying that it is completely useless, promising developments must be carried out, but it is not advisable to install it en masse on machines in combat units right now.

[carstorm 11]

Set 20. 65 90 m and b 3 are also under a hundred. Count for the year yourself. KAZ is being finished. The entire Internet video is crammed.

[Thrifty]

Castrom11 - so far T14 has been delivered 4, 20 are promised by the end of the year, and B3 in any modernization is a one-shot tank, with its slots between the DZ blocks in the tower!

[Thrifty]

All the arguments? In addition to the minuses in the sense of saying what they wanted, or how the reflex is developed in the experimental rabbits, they saw the nickname-put a minus ???

[carstorm 11]

In a modern battle, a tank will generally survive for minutes if the belligerents are approximately equal in potential. Slots?)))

[Tiksi-3]

Quote: carstorm 11

20 put

in the article it was said that by the end of the year 20 should be, but at this moment - the number of cars in the batch is not known ... have you read the article carefully ??

[lucul]

Firstly, where is our KAZ on it? After all, they promised to put it on the T90M! Secondly, it is necessary to modernize ALL T90s in this way, and put the promised KAZ on them

That KAZ was given to you)))
Much more important is what is on it

In addition, the T-90M tanks are equipped with the equipment of the unified tactical control system (ESU TZ).

But this is already a network centric, with all the consequences)))

[Thrifty]

lucul, that is, the impossibility of mass production of KAZs for tanks is nonsense? The whole world is stubbornly developing and creating KAZs, we alone are the old-fashioned way, "maybe, I suppose" we hope !!!

[lucul]

lucul, that is, the impossibility of mass production of KAZs for tanks is nonsense? The whole world is stubbornly developing and creating KAZs, we alone are the old-fashioned way, "maybe, I suppose" we hope !!!

The whole world could not go into hypersound, and if we, like the USSR, would catch up with "the whole world", then we would not be able to go into hypersound either)))

[carstorm 11]

KAZ is not a panacea. Its presence will simply change the tactics of the battle. 80+ percent of tanks in all military conflicts are now killed not by enemy tanks.

[venik]

Quote: Thrifty

The whole world stubbornly develops and creates KaZy, we alone are the old-fashioned way, "perhaps, yes, I suppose" we hope !!!

=====
That's right ... Develops and creates .... By the way, we were the first to start, and we experienced "Rain" in Afghanistan! We got very good results ... But we decided to get away from him: they posed a very serious danger to the infantry moving behind the tank and even armored vehicles located nearby (fragments can cut optics! In addition, this KAZ turned out to be effective only against cumulative shells (RPG shots) , PRUR).
The second step was KAZ "Arena" (here, the shooting of the striking elements was carried out only in the direction of the incoming ammunition. This reduced the danger to others and increased the efficiency ("Arena" can effectively hit even approaching spacecraft fired from tank guns!). But there is one serious drawback. remained: the system continued to remain ineffective against BOPS. serious enemy with tanks and anti-tank artillery - it is of little use. In addition, it turned out to be too expensive ...
Hence the question: WHO is now massively putting KAZ on tanks? Only Israel! And this is because their main opponents (the Palestinians and Hezbollah) have neither tanks nor anti-tank artillery ...
The states are still thinking of installing it, but only on machines intended to be used against the "barmaley" ......
PS Rumor has it that "Afghanit" can take BOPS as well ... But these are just rumors ...
PPS KAZ is definitely a piece necessary, and her necessary modify and bring to mind!

[Roman Efremov]

All T-90A will eventually be upgraded to level M.

[sen]

Nice car, but it still could use a couple of "Cornets" in armored casings somewhere on the side.

[SKVichyakow]

The author writes: "... a remote-controlled machine-gun installation of 12.7 mm caliber is being installed." And which one was there before?

[Bad_gr]

Quote: SKVichyakow

installed ... a remote-controlled machine-gun installation of 12.7-mm caliber. "And which one was there before?

It was in this design (below the commander's panorama, above the machine gun) at the beginning was 7,62mm. The military did not like it, they finalized it, and now it is 12,7mm.

[Thorvlobnor IV]

What for? He also knows how to shoot a guided missile through the barrel.

[lucul]

Nice car, but it still could use a couple of "Cornets" in armored casings somewhere on the side.

There, the new gun has more than 1mm armor penetration, with new shells.

[mvg]

more than 1mm, with new shells

Do not invent what they do in St. Petersburg - a little more than 600 mm of homogenous material. And yes, new shells cannot be crammed into the T-90M, so there is still the same 2A46-M5

[Bad_gr]

Quote: mvg

And yes, new shells cannot be crammed into the T-90M

All modernized tanks (both T-72 and T-90) are equipped with a new AZ, it allows you to work with shells up to 740mm in length (if I remember correctly)

[mvg]

up to 740mm long (if I remember correctly)

It's not about AZ. And I meant 2A82-1M in Armata.
New shells over 900 mm long.
Something like
https://topwar.ru/152610-2a82-i-vakuum-1-novinki-dlja-tankovyh-vojsk.html

[Bad_gr]

Quote: mvg

It's not about AZ. And I meant 2A82-1M in Armata.
New shells over 900 mm long.

In the T-90 it is possible to put a 2A82-1M cannon (I have not heard that they have already installed it), but with a length of 900 mm of the projectile we will rest against the AZ. In the one that is now being put on the T72-90, as I already wrote, the limitation is 740mm.

[Barberry25]

yes, a long time ago they found a solution - cut out niches in the case and weld armor on top ... then the question is more about the readiness of production ... or if we put it on all tanks at once and KAZ and a cannon with shells ... but it's expensive, and we like new ones names .. so we are waiting for the T-72b4 and T-90M1.

[Old tanker]

The fact is that an elongated BOPS does not require an elongated charging chamber, if the additional powder charge on it remains in the same dimensions. So no new weapon is required. In this case, the whole problem remains in the AZ.

[lucul]

Do not invent what they do in St. Petersburg - a little more than 600 mm of homogenous material. And yes, new shells cannot be crammed into the T-90M, so there is still the same 2A46-M5

Don't la-la)))
2A82-1m stands there)))

[carstorm 11]

Yeah. And a couple of zircons)))

[Nikolay L]

I remembered the anecdote about the 28 tanks received by the regiment, which were divided into 13 companies by 5 units. There is YouTube in the vastness. Whinnied to tears.