Rosoboronexport announced the signing of a new contract for the supply of the second set of S-400 air defense systems to Turkey

48

A new contract for the supply to Turkey of the second set of the S-400 Triumph anti-aircraft missile system may be signed in the near future. This was stated by the general director of Rosoboronexport, Alexander Mikheev.

In the framework of the Army-2021 international forum, answering a question from journalists about the prospects for signing a contract for the supply of a second set of S-400 air defense systems to Turkey, Mikheev explained that the agreement could be signed in the near future. According to him, the final consultations are currently underway, the next step will be the signing of the contract.



As the head of Rosoboronexport noted, the IDEF 2021 arms exhibition, which ended in Turkey on August 20, in which the Russian delegation participated, greatly helped the progress in consultations with the Turks and the planned signing of the contract.

The exhibition was successfully held, our delegation brought a good inquiry program

- he added.

Earlier, Ankara expressed its intentions to purchase the second set of S-400 air defense systems and does not intend to refuse the purchase, despite the pressure from the United States. The Russian side confirmed its readiness to supply the anti-aircraft system to the Turks after the conclusion of a new agreement. It should be reminded that Turkey purchased the first set of S-400s on credit, but has already paid off in full.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    Ad
    Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official
    48 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. Bat
      +6
      23 August 2021 11: 23
      Whatever one may say, but the news is good. Sold at international prices, this is 1 plus. Rosoboronexport and the enterprise itself also earned this 2 plus. Dependence on Russia (spare parts and missiles and training) is a 3 plus. Sticks in the wheels of NATO is 4 plus.
      1. +5
        23 August 2021 11: 48
        supply contract second set of air defense systems S-400 Turkey

        In addition, this is already an indicator of quality.
        1. Bat
          +9
          23 August 2021 11: 54
          Quote: Popandos
          In addition, this is already an indicator of quality.

          Undoubtedly. Hr-en you make the Turk buy junk. I know this firsthand.
          1. +7
            23 August 2021 11: 58
            A good example for India and other customers looking to buy the S-400 and fearing US sanctions.
      2. -13
        23 August 2021 11: 57
        Well, hmm! The third "plus" is - Loot does not smell !!! Mother Native will be sold ... And, to supply advanced weapons to the primordial enemy of Russia - this is how one should not respect oneself and not have any pride !!! You, and people like you, of course, find "pluses" and excuses !!! But this is a betrayal !!! And received "thirty pieces of silver" !!!
        1. Bat
          +3
          23 August 2021 11: 59
          Quote: Yuriy71
          And, to supply advanced weapons to the primordial enemy of Russia

          with such thoughts you will never have friends. Personally, we Azerbaijanis also fought against the Ottoman Empire. Back in the days of the Safavids, so what?
          1. +6
            23 August 2021 12: 50
            Here is the full site of the contingent, for which, if we do not sell weapons, then because this is outdated rubbish and is not needed by anyone, and if we sell, then we treacherously arm the enemies with the latest weapons) Wherever you spit - everywhere is zrada, poor people.
          2. +1
            23 August 2021 13: 42
            Quote: Yarasa
            with such thoughts you will never have friends.

            Do you think that Turkey is a historical and potential friend of Russia? We look at the questionnaire:
            In general, the Russo-Turkish wars cover a period of 351 years (1568-1918). During this period, Russia and Turkey were at war for 69 years. On average, one Russian-Turkish war was separated from another only 25 years.

            Next:
            In 1961, the United States began deploying 15 PGM-19 Jupiter medium-range missiles near Izmir in Turkey with a range of 2 km, which directly threatened the European part of the Soviet Union, reaching Moscow. President Kennedy considered these missiles to be of limited strategic importance, as ballistic missile submarines could cover the same area with the advantage of stealth and firepower. However, in the late 400s, medium-range missiles were technologically superior to ICBMs, which at that time could not be constantly on alert. Another advantage of medium-range missiles is the short flight time - less than 1950 minutes.

            I am interested in a purely everyday question: "Do we have the right in 60 years to sincerely believe Turkey, whose consent to the deployment of medium-range missiles almost plunged the world into TMV?"
            ==========
            People's doubts have good reasons. And I dare to remind you that the presence of perfect weapons allows you to make such plans that the old, antediluvian and primitive does not give. And it is very good if there is something in the electronic stuffing of the export complex that does not allow shooting down Russian planes.
            ==========
            I also believed that knowledgeable and smart people sit in the General Staff and the Ministry of Defense.
            It even seemed to me that no millions of dollars could force us to send aviation to extinguish other people's foreign fires, when DOMA was burning 7 hectares of taiga
            Today the president said that inflation in the Russian Federation reached 6,5% at an annual level ... Today ... And the indexation of military pensions from 01.10.2021 provides for their increase by 3,7% ...
            So, there is a good saying: "An old friend is better than two new ones." Why is it that in Russia old friends are so soon forgotten, and new ones are made depending on the purchasing power?
          3. 0
            25 August 2021 06: 36
            I have a question for you. When I served in the army in the early nineties, we had two Azerbaijanis in our company. They spoke Russian completely fluently, without any accent. But they called themselves Turks. Question: how do modern Azerbaijanis view the possible unification of Turkey and Azerbaijan into one state?
        2. +4
          23 August 2021 12: 12
          Quote: Yuriy71
          Do not have any !!! You, and people like you, of course, find "pluses" and excuses !!! But this is a betrayal !!! And received "thirty pieces of silver" !!

          Germany is the "primordial enemy" of France. As long as they fought with each other, they inflicted untold losses. And now? This is about the maxim about "primordial enemies". Well, it's not a secret for anyone that the exported weapons "do not shoot" at their manufacturers. Naturally, I do not mean machines. wassat
          1. -2
            23 August 2021 13: 33
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Well, it's not a secret for anyone that exported weapons do not "shoot" at their manufacturers.

            It's a secret for me. Were there precedents, except for cases of attempts to use it within one country?
            And reprogramming for a technologically advanced country is fundamentally impossible, if you have time, years to study?
            1. +4
              23 August 2021 13: 51
              Quote: MBRBS
              And reprogramming for a technologically advanced country is fundamentally impossible, if you have time, years to study?

              The likelihood of BREAKING is much higher than removing the "bookmarks".
          2. -1
            23 August 2021 13: 57
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Germany is the "primordial enemy" of France.

            Both on! And Russia and France, in general, fought together against fascism, which did not prevent them from giving a shock to the supply of helicopter carriers to Russia ... And they are in no hurry to share technologies with them ... And GB generally has such "love" for Russia that it cannot eat. And Russia sends her gold and launches 28 British satellites ...
            We must understand that everyone lies to us and there is no Russophobia? I even know how to make the Japanese love us ... Only, is such love necessary? Let me remind you of one fable by I.A. Krylov:
            A serpent crawled to the peasant
            And he says: “Neighbor! let's start living together!
            Now you don’t need to worry about me;
            You see that I became completely different
            And she changed her skin this spring. ”
            However, the Man Snake did not convince.
            A man grabbed a butt
            And says: “Even though you are in new skin,
            Yes, your heart is still the same. "

            And knocked out a spirit from a neighbor.

            When you are self-conscious you will give a reason,
            As you want, you change your identity:
            You cannot save yourself under it,
            And what happens to the Snake, it may happen to you.
        3. 0
          23 August 2021 20: 28
          “England has neither permanent allies nor permanent enemies. England has only permanent interests. "
        4. -1
          25 August 2021 08: 51
          Do you have a German car? not Japanese? I hope you are a terry patriot! there is nothing enemy in the house - no refrigerators, no TVs. and your cell phone is Russian and Lada Vesta painted in Khokhloma!
      3. 0
        23 August 2021 14: 35
        What did you get from that you sold the S-400 at international prices?
    2. +2
      23 August 2021 11: 35
      It seems that the Turks do not even give a penny to Bidon. They still looked back at Trump.
    3. -7
      23 August 2021 11: 41
      Is it okay to supply modern equipment to a potential enemy, a NATO country? Is this not a state. treason? What guarantees can there be that these weapons will not be used against Russia and its allies?
      1. +9
        23 August 2021 11: 45
        winked I think a very narrow circle of developers and manufacturers knows about these guarantees. And something tells me, they won't tell us anything about it. laughing
        1. -7
          23 August 2021 11: 54
          And something tells me that the protection there is organized at the software level (ROM, even if it is not resolvable), which inspires some concern.
      2. 0
        23 August 2021 11: 47
        Quote: MBRBS
        And that's okay

        Greece - not talking about anything?
        1. -4
          23 August 2021 12: 06
          Quote: kot423
          Greece - not talking about anything?

          and that's not good either. Of course, "the capitalist will sell you a rope on which he will be hung", but after Turkey shot down our plane there is something to think about. Even if Erdogan is Putin's bosom friend))
          1. +6
            23 August 2021 12: 13
            Quote: MBRBS
            but after Turkey shot down our plane there is something to think about

            Do you guarantee that Nata's C400 and C300 are a calculator that can be hacked in half an hour, while picking your nose for 28 minutes? Do you have written confirmation from the developers and MO about this? You would at least ask on the internet how the export version differs from ours and why mattresses, having access to the C300 for thirty years, still cannot do something better than a patriot ...
            Regarding the shooting down - do you have reinforced concrete docks, that there is not a non-removable "friend / foe" block sewn in there, how do they make mattresses on their air defenses? Or do you think our developers are worse than mattresses?
            1. -4
              23 August 2021 12: 22
              You give guarantees that Nata's C400 and C300 is a calculator that can be hacked in half an hour,

              Can you give guarantees that the study of the design and algorithms of work did not begin immediately after receiving the first batch?
              do you have reinforced concrete docks, that there is not a non-removable "friend / foe" block sewn in there, as they do on their air defense mattresses?

              and would sell the mattresses to us a set (division) of the Patriot, if we asked them? After all, there is an unrecoverable block, there is nothing to be afraid of? Or the F-35 squadron?
              Or do you think our developers are worse than mattresses?
              1. +3
                23 August 2021 12: 29
                Quote: MBRBS
                Can you give guarantees that the study of the design and algorithms of work did not begin immediately after receiving the first batch?

                Studying the design and algorithms of work is not an indicator of hacking for copying / detecting vulnerabilities (and even more so "forcing" to fire weapons "at their own"). C300 is confirmation of this.
                Quote: MBRBS
                and would sell the mattresses to us a set (division) of the Patriot, if we asked them? After all, there is an unrecoverable block, there is nothing to be afraid of? Or the F-35 squadron?

                What for? Take bullshit, which has already proven its inferiority to the whole world, instead of developments in its construction schools? This is treason.
                1. -4
                  23 August 2021 13: 25
                  You didn't understand the question: IF we asked them?
                  I didn’t write that this weapon is very interesting to us.
                  1. +1
                    23 August 2021 13: 35
                    Quote: MBRBS
                    You do not understand the question: IF we asked them?

                    You did not understand the answer.
                    What is interesting for the country in terms of development, you can not beg / threaten the allies, but simply take "trophies", as it was (the closest example) in Syria. And mind you - they took a rocket (rockets) of a non-export version, which is painful for mattresses in terms of replacing the filling / software. But you get away from the topic, I don't know if this is your laziness or not listening to the arguments of your opponent - instead of looking for information about Russia's export weapons, you start nodding at the mattresses, here. Let me tell you: only on the Zvezda channel there were several programs about export weapons in general and about air defense / missile defense (C300 / 400) in particular.
                2. -3
                  23 August 2021 14: 07
                  and even more so "force" to shoot weapons "at their own"). C300 is confirmation of this.

                  once again - what kind of confirmation are you talking about? Can the very fact of the sale be considered a confirmation? Or were there attempts to fire from the S-300 aircraft of a country friendly to Russia? Or, "take my word for it, the S-300 will not want to shoot at the aircraft of countries friendly to Russia"?
                  1. +1
                    23 August 2021 14: 24
                    Quote: MBRBS
                    Or were there attempts to fire from the S-300 aircraft of a country friendly to Russia?

                    Quote: kot423
                    I don’t know if this is your laziness or not listening to the arguments of your opponent - instead of looking for information about Russia's export weapons, you start nodding at the mattresses, here. Let me tell you: only on the Zvezda channel there were several programs about export weapons in general and about air defense / missile defense (C300 / 400) in particular.
                    1. -3
                      23 August 2021 14: 32
                      instead of looking for information about Russia's export weapons

                      I watch "Zvezda" (now, however, less and less). And I have read a lot about the features of export weapons. And that "the S-300 complex cannot be used against Russia" is also in the know. Do you build your confidence on the statements of officials? (Someone promised us that there will be no increase in the pension age in life (for sure) ...)
                      1. +2
                        23 August 2021 14: 39
                        Quote: MBRBS
                        Do you build your confidence on the statements of officials? (Someone promised us that there will be no increase in the pension age in life (for sure) ...)

                        I build my confidence on the fact that I myself have been working in the production of tank engines for more than 25 years. At the same time, there are such parameters / materials / technologies, for the disclosure of which it will shine for me from 20 years. That is why I perfectly understand the manufacturers / developers of С300 / 400/500 that some aspects in no case can be disclosed to a wide range of people, tk. this, and not the sale of exports, will be considered treason according to this subscription.
                        This answer does not suit you either, should you personally be reported in writing?
                        1. +1
                          23 August 2021 15: 15
                          Your answer suits me perfectly (everything is clear!) And, mind you, I didn’t give you any minuses. (I also worked, as a technologist, on the production of liquid fuel rocket engines - this is so, for reference)
                        2. +2
                          23 August 2021 15: 23
                          Quote: MBRBS
                          I didn’t give you any minuses.

                          I do not put any minuses to my opponents (with the exception of those who are stubborn from 404, and they can be seen immediately by the style of presentation), here without me there are enough "minusers" / anonyms.
                        3. +1
                          23 August 2021 15: 24
                          sorry then
                        4. 0
                          23 August 2021 15: 25
                          Quote: MBRBS
                          sorry then

                          It's alright drinks hi
      3. -6
        23 August 2021 11: 49
        Quote: MBRBS
        NATO country? Is this not a state. treason?

        Yes it is. As well as the sale of the S-300 to Greece.
        Quote: MBRBS
        What guarantees can there be that these weapons will not be used against Russia and its allies?

        None. Judging by the placement in the vicinity of the city of Sinop, it is directed against us.
        1. +5
          23 August 2021 12: 01
          The S-400 can hardly act against us.
          1. -3
            23 August 2021 12: 08
            Quote: Bearded
            The S-400 can hardly act against us.

            There are no grounds for this statement. As practice shows, one can cope better against one another.
        2. +2
          23 August 2021 19: 24
          Generally not posted in the synop. There he was tested. Polygon because there. Where will be posted is still unknown
      4. 0
        23 August 2021 11: 57
        The weapon is defensive, Russia has repeatedly expressed that it is not going to fight with anyone. In case of aggression by Turkey, the issue will be resolved by other means. Well, the ammunition load of the Turks is not endless.
    4. +4
      23 August 2021 11: 46
      It should be reminded that Turkey bought the first set of S-400s on credit, but has already paid off in full.


      If so, then you can sell more ...
    5. +2
      23 August 2021 11: 46
      Look you. Looks like they liked it. This is not some kind of Patriot. winked
    6. +1
      23 August 2021 11: 51
      Petriot's manufacturer swore.
    7. +4
      23 August 2021 12: 08
      The sultan is clever.
      He received the best long-range air defense and missile defense system in the world.
      I asked the USA a question: will you sell your system and aircraft to us and at normal prices or not? If we have no choice, we have both quality and prices!
      A billion $ is a tasty morsel even for the United States.
      Now in the United States they play like a hot plate in the military-industrial complex, and in the army and in Congress (corruption is the lobby of "politics")
      I asked a question, will you sell the F35 and help Turkey create its own 5th generation aircraft or not? Then we will buy an airplane too!
    8. -5
      23 August 2021 12: 49
      Quote: MBRBS
      Is it okay to supply modern equipment to a potential enemy, a NATO country? Is this not a state. treason? What guarantees can there be that these weapons will not be used against Russia and its allies?

      For a country that is not allowed to compete at the Olympics under its own flag, this is apparently familiar, especially since previous authors noted that money has no smell. sad As for "state treason" - this is generally a rhetorical and funny question. Shall I say where she is - "treason", or the fershtein themselves? winked
    9. -1
      23 August 2021 12: 52
      Quote: Wolf
      The sultan is clever.
      He received the best long-range air defense and missile defense system in the world.
      I asked the USA a question: will you sell your system and aircraft to us and at normal prices or not? If we have no choice, we have both quality and prices!
      A billion $ is a tasty morsel even for the United States.
      Now in the United States they play like a hot plate in the military-industrial complex, and in the army and in Congress (corruption is the lobby of "politics")
      I asked a question, will you sell the F35 and help Turkey create its own 5th generation aircraft or not? Then we will buy an airplane too!

      I agree with you - Borz, that the sultan is "cunning" .... wink
    10. 0
      24 August 2021 06: 46
      In today's world, the most important weapon is money, not firing cannons.
    11. -4
      24 August 2021 14: 14
      I have already written a commentary on this News and I think that this is a betrayal !!! And, everything is said here! Loot "does not smell" !!!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"