"Meet all the requirements": Algeria began negotiations on the purchase of Russian Be-200

73

Algeria is targeting Russian Be-200 amphibious aircraft, and the Algerian military is determined to acquire a batch of these aircraft. The reason is trivial - fires are raging in the country, and the specialized aviation there is no extinguishing technique.

The Algerian Ministry of Defense has already begun negotiations with the Russian side on the acquisition of a batch of Be-200 amphibious aircraft, follows from a communiqué issued by the Algerian military department. We are talking about four aircraft.



As explained in the Ministry of National Defense, large-scale fires that occurred in several regions of the country forced the authorities to think about purchasing aircraft capable of fighting fires in extreme conditions. The market for such aircraft was studied, after which the choice fell on Russia. According to the Algerian military, the Be-200 meets all the requirements.

The world famous Be-200 water bombers have proven their effectiveness against forest fires in a number of countries around the world.

- says the communique.

For our part, we note that in the event of a contract, the issue of the Be-200 engines will remain unresolved. At present, these aircraft are equipped with Ukrainian D-436TPs manufactured by Motor Sich, and Ukraine can “clip wings” on an order, refusing to supply them to the “aggressor country”. At the same time, there is an option in which Algeria will independently order the engines for the aircraft, and then transfer them to the manufacturer.

In 2018 at the TANTK im. Beriev announced the launch of the production of Be-200 aircraft with the Russian-French SaM146 engine, and the remotorization of the aircraft for it, but News on this topic no. Also, there is no news yet about the Russian PD-10, which is planned to be installed on the Be-200.
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -7
    18 August 2021 11: 46
    In Taganrog, this will not be cold or hot, taking into account the disrupted orders for the supply of them first to the army, and then to the Ministry of Emergencies. As if this contract, when it was signed, was not thwarted, or even canceled by the Algerians ...
    1. +5
      18 August 2021 13: 01
      There would be a DEMAND, otherwise they are twisting their noses - give an order and an advance payment and the plant will work at full capacity - we will provide the whole world ... Any country will buy such a handsome man ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        18 August 2021 19: 33
        My neighbor works for Beriev, if I write here how they are assembling the Be-200, I think I will not fight off the minuses not when, but the people will realize that if they get the plant an order for at least 50 aircraft, they will not be able to physically execute it.
    2. -4
      18 August 2021 16: 08
      It’s you there that you’re accustomed to breaking contracts, even armored personnel carriers, and Russia will supply BE-200, because, unlike 404, it fulfills contractual obligations. A TANTK them. G.M. I hope Berieva will bake these truly unique planes like cakes. All these problems with engines and a lack of production capacity are very temporary, given the availability of money, and Russia has it, this is a start for TANTK them. G.M. Beriev. Algeria is not the last customer, there was already an insight that Turkey is very seriously interested. There are many more interested who are simply not given the opportunity to have these planes - Spain, Greece, etc.
      1. +2
        18 August 2021 16: 45
        If I'm not mistaken, that is, a joint Franco-Russian development of the engine instead of the "brotherly" one - it is more powerful, more compact and cheaper ... sorry, I can't find the data. but there were ...
        1. +1
          19 August 2021 12: 51
          yes there were some conversations about the engine with the French from Snecma, and it is not clear there is nothing, it looks like they made a bet on PD
    3. -1
      18 August 2021 22: 02
      Oh, the demand has appeared, but there are no engines !!! request Thanks to our country's leadership, how well they destroyed aviation and all related industries !!! am
      1. -2
        19 August 2021 09: 40
        Again, the country's leadership is to blame. Listen, young anti-Putin: - every mistake has its own name, patronymic and surname. Should the country's leadership, and even more so personally GDP, be concerned with this issue? Just to fart. You will have Putin to blame even if the toilet cracks from your excessive efforts. Yes. Taganrog has a lot of problems. But they can be solved. As well as the issue with the engine. We will provide Algeria, no question, but we need a new engine for ourselves. Although I personally would prefer to take Zaporozhye. A little more, and the time will come. The main thing is less blood.
  2. +19
    18 August 2021 11: 49
    Also, there is still no news about the Russian PD-10, which is planned to be installed on the Be-200.

    PD 8.
    In May of this year, the PD 8 gas generator was assembled and installed on a test bench. During the first stage of testing, the specialists successfully worked out starting the engine and operating at maximum mode. In 2022, tests of the power supply system for the PD-8 engine will begin.
    The dvigun itself is not yet in nature, it is expected at the end of the 22nd. Accordingly, certification and the start of production are scheduled for 2023-2024. If there is no progress to the right.
    1. +10
      18 August 2021 12: 23
      Quote: kapitan92
      If there is no progress to the right.

      There will be a contract for PD-8, i.e. Be-200 with PD-8 and / or SSJ-100 with PD-8 will work for sure. Especially if the contract is from abroad - no one is going to pay the penalty.

      On the other hand, will the same Algerians want to "take risks" and buy a car with a completely new engine.

      PS: Taking into account that the fires this year are extreme, and in the future it is not expected to be less, the Be-200 will be in great demand. It is high time to solve problems at TANTK.
      1. +4
        18 August 2021 12: 46
        Quote: Kurare
        On the other hand, will the same Algerians want to "take risks" and buy a car with a completely new engine

        It seems that you can supply for export with imported engines. Are there any sanctions for buying engines in this case? If I am wrong, then just correct and explain, and do not throw anonymous minuses. hi
        1. +7
          18 August 2021 12: 56
          Quote: Piramidon
          It seems that you can supply for export with imported engines.

          hi Yes, but subject to certification. The Be-200 was certified only with the D-436, it was planned to replace it with the SaM146 from the SSJ-100, but they realized that it was a mess. We make our own PD-8, i.e. line PD-14.
          Quote: Piramidon
          ... do not throw anonymous cons.

          I personally put downsides only for outright trolling and rudeness. I am trying to refute an opinion that differs from mine with arguments, not "minuses".
          1. +2
            18 August 2021 13: 09
            Quote: Kurare
            I am trying to refute an opinion that differs from mine with arguments, not "minuses".

            Please accept my respect.
            1. +1
              18 August 2021 14: 06
              Quote: tihonmarine
              Quote: Kurare
              I am trying to refute an opinion that differs from mine with arguments, not "minuses".

              Please accept my respect.

              Thank you. hi I would be glad if there is not one such in VO.
              Yes, in general, it's high time to deal with the rabid "minusers". It's not even about the "minuses" as such. It's just that sometimes the branch will be dirtied ...
              1. +2
                18 August 2021 14: 25
                Quote: Kurare
                Yes, in general, it's high time to figure out the rabid "minusers"

                The whole question is HOW? Previously, it was possible to look and determine who this bold minus is. And now these creepy administrators have taken under their patronage and indulge them in every possible way. Perhaps they themselves are interested in watching this confrontation between famous and anonymous. request
                1. +1
                  18 August 2021 14: 31
                  If the moderators do not understand this, the users are not given to us. They and only they can fight it.
                  You can, as an option, introduce a restriction on the "issue of minuses" or a window, how many minuses one or another participant handed out. If he did this without arguing his "negative attitude" to posts, it will at least be seen who is crap.
                  1. +4
                    18 August 2021 16: 37
                    If he did this without arguing his "negative attitude" to posts, it will at least be seen who is crap.


                    The president is elected - check the box or not. Without any writing of arguments. The fate of a person in a jury is decided by counting votes. And arguments for opinion are optional.
                    Do you propose to turn comments on the article into a long boring footcloth of no one interesting squabbles that have gone far away from the topic? Without any argument, the pros and cons show the attitude of the reader towards what they have read. Few ? Or a lot? There are sites where the scribble is reviewed by experts, there are those where you can easily throw poop.
                    There is a balance on VO. Satisfactory for both the majority of visitors and site owners.
              2. +1
                18 August 2021 18: 23
                Why deal with them, put your pros if you are so worried about it
        2. -7
          18 August 2021 12: 58
          and do not throw anonymous cons
          - it's time to get used to it laughing , there is nothing to say on the topic, but minus it is necessary to put it in, they are unsinkable as "United Russia" hi
          1. +2
            18 August 2021 13: 57
            Quote: faiver
            - it's time to get used to it, there is nothing to say on the topic, but minus it is necessary to put it in,

            I agree. On VO there is a certain "minus sect" or they mold minuses to everyone in a row, or to those who personally do not like them. The mind is not enough for arguments, only for pressing the "-" button, like a chimpanzee in a laboratory. hi laughing
            PS. On this post, primates will also begin to stomp on the button. laughing
          2. +2
            18 August 2021 14: 30
            Quote: faiver
            - it's time to get used to it, there is nothing to say on the topic, but minus it is necessary to put it in, they are unsinkable like "United Russia"

            I looked at your minuses, and decided to support with word and plus.
            1. -1
              19 August 2021 08: 07
              I looked at your flood about the pros and cons, not the topic of the article and decided to support it with a minus (just kidding) laughing
          3. +1
            18 August 2021 18: 25
            It is possible to say on the topic and to slap a minus, do you think there is no such development of events?
          4. +1
            18 August 2021 18: 52
            By the unique ability to politicize any post, it is easy to guess about your disease. Most likely it is the maidan of the brain.
      2. +4
        18 August 2021 12: 47
        In your opinion, PD-8 is being created without a contract and funds allocated for it?
        .13 July 2020, AEX.RU - The Russian PD-8 engine, which is planned to be used on the SSJ 100 and Be-200 aircraft, will receive a type certificate in 2023. Vladimir Artyakov, the first deputy head of the state corporation Rostec, spoke about this in an interview with TASS.

        "We plan to create a gas generator next year, to undergo certification in 2023," he said.

        Enough funds have been allocated for the project, Artyakov noted. "The volume of investments is sufficient to ensure that all work on the creation of a new engine is carried out efficiently and on time," the top manager emphasized.

        According to him, the base of the engine can also be used for helicopters. "This is a power plant for a wide range of applications - it can be used in SuperJet, Be-200, and in advanced helicopters," he said.

        Artyakov noted that the question of the need to create such an engine is not even raised. “Russian aircraft must use Russian engines. Otherwise, we become vulnerable: sanctions pressure, as we see, is often used as a tool of unfair competition. Therefore, now, based on the solutions used in the PD-14 gas generator for MS-21, we are developing the PD-8 engine ", - said the first deputy head of the state corporation.

        https://www.aex.ru/m/news/2020/7/13/214545/
        1. -1
          18 August 2021 12: 59
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          In your opinion, PD-8 is being created without a contract and funds allocated for it?

          I have not heard of a firm contract for the SSJ-100 with the PD-8. If you have any other information, I will be glad for both information and the fact of a contract. hi
          1. +2
            18 August 2021 13: 20
            Quote: Kurare
            Quote: OrangeBigg
            In your opinion, PD-8 is being created without a contract and funds allocated for it?

            I have not heard of a firm contract for the SSJ-100 with the PD-8. If you have any other information, I will be glad for both information and the fact of a contract. hi


            Google if you really need a contract, but probably without it there would be no gestures.
            . Gelendzhik, Krasnodar Territory, October 16 - IA Neftegaz.RU. Installation of the Russian PD-8 engine on Sukhoi Superjet 100 (SSJ 100) aircraft is planned from 2023.
            About this the head of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) Yuri Slyusar on October 16, 2020 as part of the Hydroaviasalon-2020 in Gelendzhik.
            Theses of Yu. Slyusar:
            PD-8 engine for SSJ 100 and Be-200 amphibious aircraft may be ready in 2022.
            first of all, the PD-8 will be installed on the SSJ 100, and then on the Be-200.
            full import independence from Ukraine will be achieved.
            Earlier, the first deputy head of Rostec V. Artyakov reported that PD-8 will receive a type certificate in 2023.


            ... The import-substituted version of the SSJ 100 was named SSJ New.
            Development work on the creation of the SSJ New is scheduled for completion in 2023.
            In particular, it is planned to replace the Russian-French SaM146 engine with the PD-8, as well as a number of improvements to increase the aircraft's efficiency.
            So, in SSJ New, the design of the fuselage will change, the center of gravity will be adjusted, replaced with domestic air conditioning, braking, power supply, water supply and waste disposal systems, crew oxygen system, air leakage sensors, ice and air temperature alarms, landing gear, passenger seats, heat and sound insulation mats and etc.

            https://neftegaz.ru/news/aviatehnika/635581-ustanovka-rossiyskikh-dvigateley-pd-8-na-ssj-100-mozhet-nachatsya-s-2023-g/
            1. -1
              18 August 2021 14: 04
              Quote: OrangeBigg
              Google if you really need a contract, but maybe without him there would be no body movements.

              Probably is not existing. At the same time, the refrain of the song "Oil" by Semyon Slepakov is immediately recalled.

              As I wrote above, I have not heard of a firm contract for the SSJ-100 with the PD-8.
              1. +2
                18 August 2021 15: 23
                Quote: Kurare
                As I wrote above, I have not heard of a firm contract for the SSJ-100 with the PD-8.

                How do you imagine a contract for a non-existent product? Only the presence of a certificate (will be in 2023) is legally a product.
                1. 0
                  18 August 2021 15: 43
                  Quote: Genry
                  How do you imagine a contract for a non-existent product?

                  In about the same way as the KBP, led by Shipunov, at one time signed a contract with the UAE for the supply of the then non-existent Pantsir. Shipunov managed to convince the customer that they would do it on time and taking into account all the performance characteristics. They did not succeed in time, but they even surpassed the performance characteristics.
                  1. +2
                    18 August 2021 15: 45
                    Quote: Kurare
                    KBP, led by Shipunov, at one time signed a contract with the United Arab Emirates for the supply of the shell, which did not exist at that time.

                    A contract for the supply of a product or work on the development of assemblies? Please clarify.
                    1. -1
                      18 August 2021 15: 48
                      Quote: Genry
                      Product contract or assembly work? Please clarify.

                      The UAE initially signed a contract specifically for delivery n-nogo (I do not remember how many) the number of Shells. Those. they, in principle, were not interested in the fact that the product as such at the time of signing the contract simply does not exist.

                      Another example: many here are "respected" F-35, which was originally a JSF project. No aircraft, but firm contracts for its delivery were signed.

                      From myself: I would be very happy if, for example, Aeroflot, signed a contract for the supply of a certain amount of SSJ-100 new with PD-8.
                      1. +1
                        18 August 2021 15: 54
                        Quote: Kurare
                        they, in principle, were not interested in the fact that the product as such at the time of signing the contract simply does not exist.

                        You can't sell something that doesn't exist. You apparently just simplified everything a lot.
                        Most likely, there was already a certification of the Shell and its tests were taking place.
                      2. 0
                        18 August 2021 16: 01
                        Quote: Genry
                        You can't sell something that doesn't exist. You apparently just simplified everything a lot.

                        I gave you two examples. Your argument: "It can't be because it can't be" (c) Good luck.
                      3. 0
                        18 August 2021 16: 03
                        Quote: Kurare
                        I gave you two examples.

                        You just talked about the contracts that you did not show.
                        Fairy tales are not copies of documents!
                      4. +1
                        18 August 2021 16: 15
                        Telling fairy tales? Copies of documents? And the key to the apartment, where the money is, should you also put it under the rug?
                        At first, the military did not show much interest in the new anti-aircraft complex. Pantsir-S1 did not know how to shoot on the move, and in the opinion of the military, it could not successfully fight high-precision weapons at a distance of more than 12 kilometers. The army did not like his characteristics. Taking into account the difficult economic situation of the early 90s, the car was forgotten for a while.

                        But then chance intervened in the fate of the car. The Russian air defense system was very interested in the UAE military, but they demanded qualitatively different characteristics, and the Tula designers had to radically alter the complex. The car was equipped with new cannon armament, more advanced anti-aircraft missiles that could hit targets at a distance of twenty kilometers, radar and fire control system (FCS) were seriously changed. We can say that "Pantsir-C1" has experienced a rebirth, becoming a much more perfect and formidable machine. The tests of the new version took place in 2006.

                        The export contract was worth $ 734 million. But due to the fault of the contractors, the terms of the contract were disrupted, and the first complexes were delivered to the UAE only in 2009.

                        https://militaryarms.ru/voennaya-texnika/artilleriya/pancir-s1/

                        Shipunov himself told more about this story. Too lazy to search on YouTube. If you are really interested in this fact, and not presenting "copies of documents", look for yourself.
                      5. 0
                        19 August 2021 10: 12
                        Quote: Kurare
                        Copies of documents? And the key to the apartment, where the money is, should you also put it under the rug?

                        Do not pretend to be naive - they themselves stated about the content of the contract:
                        Quote: Kurare
                        The UAE initially signed a contract specifically for the supply of a n-leg (I don’t remember how many) the amount of Armor. Those. they, in principle, were not interested in the fact that the product as such at the time of signing the contract simply does not exist.


                        Quote: Kurare
                        "We can say that the Pantsir-C1 has experienced a rebirth, becoming a much more advanced and formidable machine."

                        Here's a person specifically telling you, a little poetic, that the Shell was already, as a product, before the contract with the UAE. About which I drum into you, that while there is no type certificate, there is no product and there is no legal possibility to contract it.
    2. -2
      18 August 2021 15: 30
      And PD-14 turned out to be far from the promised capabilities and “In general, Aeroflot announced that it would buy MC-21 airliners only with American engines. It's strange to hear this news after all the assurances about what a wonderful PD-14 engine we have created. The question arises - is the Russian government engaged in anything other than the World Championships and the Universiades?


      Read more on:
      https://avia.pro/blog/iskusstvennyy-zastoy-i-voshishcheniya
  3. +1
    18 August 2021 11: 52
    Most likely, it will be possible to obtain a Ukrainian engine. Nobody will put the Frenchman. PD-8 is still only in the plans.
    1. +5
      18 August 2021 12: 29
      PD-8 certification in 2023.
      ... The United Engine Corporation has completed the first stage of testing the PD-8 turbofan engine gas generator for SSJ-New aircraft. UEC specialists have achieved stable starts of the gas generator with successful reaching the maximum mode in accordance with the test program. A full-scale sample of the gas generator will be presented at the MAKS-2021 exhibition. This was reported in the press service of the UEC.

      The gas generator, which is called the "heart" of an aircraft engine, consists of a high-pressure compressor, a combustion chamber and a high-pressure turbine — it is this part that drives the power plant.


      .PD-8 - the "youngest" in the line of aircraft engines, the first of which was the PD-14. It is intended to replace the French-Russian SaM146 power plants on SSJ100 aircraft, as well as the D-436TP manufactured by the Ukrainian Motor Sich JSC on Be-200 amphibious aircraft.

      The PD-8 gas generator was assembled and installed on the test bench in May. The tests made it possible to experimentally confirm the correctness of the design solutions laid down. "The experience gained will be taken into account in the manufacture and testing of the following samples of the gas generator, as well as prototypes of the PD-8 engine," said a representative of the aviation cluster of Rostec State Corporation.

      The PD-8 engine is being created by the wide cooperation of UEC enterprises for the updated version of the Superjet 100 - SSJ-New, which will feature a high level of import substitution.

      https://aviation21.ru/vypolnen-pervyj-zapusk-gazogeneratora-dvigatelya-pd-8/


      Demonstrator PD-8 UEC at MAKS 2021.

      ... UEC seeks to obtain a type certificate for the PD-8 engine in 2023, while production work is already underway on the first prototype for certification tests.

      PD-8 is being developed as an engine alternative to the PowerJet SaM146 engine for the Sukhoi Superjet 100. The Russian company United Aircraft intends to release a modification of the Superjet, called SSJ-New, with a higher share of domestic equipment.

      https://avianews.info/odk-planiruet-sertifikatsiyu-pd-8-na-2023-god/
  4. -11
    18 August 2021 11: 55
    faster, cheaper and safer to buy from the Chinese, no matter how offensive it sounds ...
    urapatriots will roll me into the asphalt bully
    1. +19
      18 August 2021 12: 31
      Quote: faiver
      faster, cheaper and safer to buy from the Chinese, no matter how offensive it sounds ...

      The market for such aircraft was studied, after which the choice fell on Russia.
      With all due respect to your opinion.
      You will contact the representatives of Algeria and clarify the situation to them.
      1. -3
        18 August 2021 12: 45
        Thank you hi, but this is all empty talk, until there is a certified engine, until the Be-200 receives a certificate with new engines, nothing will happen, the most rosy time, I think, is 2025. But we remember that we have a tendency in the military-industrial complex with shifts to the right. I would be glad that everything would work out for Beria residents, but the plant has been shaking for many years already.
  5. -2
    18 August 2021 11: 56
    Good news. Even the native country is reluctant to buy the Be-200. And the Beriev Aircraft Company has already been sued several times (it is not clear why).
    1. +9
      18 August 2021 12: 02
      Togilen - they were tried for breaking contracts, and inappropriate use of state financial funds ...
      1. -1
        18 August 2021 12: 20
        Don't be naive. In the event of a breakdown of contracts, almost the entire military-industrial complex went to trial.
    2. +3
      18 August 2021 12: 02
      Procurement is complicated by a foreign engine, and there are many who wish.
      1. +1
        18 August 2021 12: 17
        Accordingly, you must have your own.
        1. +5
          18 August 2021 12: 18
          So they were their own until the USSR collapsed)))
  6. +3
    18 August 2021 12: 03
    Yes, there is a campaign in Taganrog, and besides the engines of the problem, contracts with our Ministry of Emergencies and Ministry of Defense will not overpower. What else is Algeria ...
    1. 0
      18 August 2021 12: 19
      And I'm writing about it too. But then there are "breakdowns of contracts", "engines", etc. Here is a banal slovenliness, following the example of how they stole contracts for the repair of MT-LB from Murom to us in Chelny, on phony charges.
    2. +1
      18 August 2021 22: 14
      Do you know why ?! Because they destroyed TRTU, which at one time supervised the LADIES! am Now there is no one to train personnel, no one to work, but now there is a bridgeodont called SFedU, which saws all the money, but there is no sense. negative
  7. +4
    18 August 2021 12: 05
    In 2018 at the TANTK im. Beriev announced the launch of production of Be-200 aircraft with the Russian-French SaM146 engine, and the remotorization of aircraft for it, but there is no news on this topic.

    There is news, in 2019, the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation banned the replacement of Ukrainian engines for the Be-200 with others with parts produced by NATO countries.
  8. 0
    18 August 2021 12: 13
    Again and again ... where is the engine?
    And the production base itself ... is rather weak!
  9. -8
    18 August 2021 12: 25
    And why make a fuss, except perhaps to excite the cheers of the electorate. Still, adults understand that "there will be no x ... from this swarm ... (shit), there will be no Ukrainian engines.
    Report, and there the grass does not grow
    1. +2
      18 August 2021 17: 39
      Ukrainian engines are the only engines on the planet Earth and nobody else makes engines?
      1. -4
        18 August 2021 17: 44
        There are five countries, if I'm not mistaken, but you're under sanctions, and your Prosecutor General's Office turns out to be our "sent Cossacks" laughing
        1. +2
          18 August 2021 17: 47
          Russia is one of the five. USA, Great Britain, France, Russia, Ukraine. Or do you disagree with something? Well, Canada still. I almost forgot.
          but you are under sanctions

          Sanctions are such sanctions. Whose engines are already flying two hundred Superjets 100, not the Franco-Russian SaM 146, which regularly enter the country?
          1. -5
            18 August 2021 18: 07
            Who would argue, but I do not.
            But what about the vaunted import substitution?
            By how many% Sam 146 from NATO components and it seems to have been banned from deliveries
            1. +3
              18 August 2021 18: 17
              ... By how many% Sam 146 from NATO components and it seems to have been banned from deliveries

              Have not heard of bans. SaM 146 has a French hot part, a Russian cold part. I am not satisfied with the fact that the French are breaking prices, so it was decided to create PD-8, which is now being tested, in particular, a gas generator. The cold part will be from SaM 146, already mastered in production.
              But what about the vaunted import substitution?

              PD-8 for the new version of the Superjet SSJ NEW.
  10. 0
    18 August 2021 13: 19
    Quote: aleks neym_2
    full capacity - we will provide the whole world ... Any country will buy such a handsome man ...

    Only make your own engines! On imported, especially Ukrainian, as it is not comme il faut! hi
  11. +1
    18 August 2021 13: 36
    Engines are not a problem in this case.
    Will buy Algeria directly from Motor Sich.
    The question is if the TANTK will cope with the construction of the Be-200 series.
  12. +2
    18 August 2021 15: 33
    "Also, there is still no news about the Russian PD-10 ..." Where does this "news" about the PD-10 come from?
    As far as is known, it is planned to install PD-8, which is still being developed.
    Also in development is the PD-35 engine. But I hear the abbreviation "PD-10" for the first time! hi
  13. +1
    18 August 2021 15: 37
    "... the Algerian military is determined to acquire a batch of these aircraft ..." If this is really the case, then this is a good sign! Despite the recent disaster in Turkey, Algeria will buy the BU-200!
    I remember that the crash of the JCC in Indonesia during a demonstration flight, greatly undermined the contracts for these aircraft.