Gazprom refused to book additional capacities for pumping gas through the Ukrainian gas transportation system

Gas price in Europe has beaten historical record, exceeding 585 dollars per thousand cubic meters. The reason for this was the actions of the Russian Gazprom.

The Russian company refused to book additional capacities for pumping gas through the Ukrainian gas transportation system for September, thereby raising gas prices by an average of 2,5%.

According to the Hungarian trading platform RBP, Gazprom has booked only 4% of the additional transit capacity, called "hard" or "guaranteed volume", put up for auction by Ukraine for September. Beginning in May, the Russian company bought out the entire volume of guaranteed capacities of 15 million cubic meters of gas per day, but at the same time giving up the non-guaranteed additional capacities that Ukraine is putting up for auction.

Now, instead of 15 million cubic meters, the company ordered only 600-650 cubic meters of gas per day to be pumped through the Ukrainian GTS. This led to a jump in the cost of gas in the European market. If at the beginning of today's trading the cost of the September futures was $ 550 per 1 cubic meters, then after the announcement of the results of the auction the price soared to $ 586,3.

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather. It is possible that this will lead to a gas shortage before the autumn-winter period. There is also a point of view that Gazprom artificially reduces gas pumping in an effort to show Europe that it cannot do without Nord Stream 2.

Comments

[Voltsky]

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather.

What horror is what is happening with this world, to imagine only gas for 600 euros ... Oh, I accidentally predicted the future, so not cleverly.

[rocket757]

The prices are almost the same as in Asia ... only in geyrope it can be COLD in winter, and green mold ... that is, energy, cannot warm everyone, alas, alas, for them.
They really want to be clean, and even consider themselves smarter than everyone else!
Alas for them, it’s not like that.

[Voltsky]

I'll tell you a secret, green energy is corruption :)

[rocket757]

What a secret ... although they call it "more beautiful", lobbying for economic interests.

[antivirus]

There is a point of view that Gazprom artificially reduces gas pumping in an effort to show Europe that it cannot do without Nord Stream 2.

IT'S EASIER - REFUSAL FROM LONG-TERM CONTRACTS AND TRANSITION TO THE SPOT MARKET. GAZPROM IN THEM, (EUROPEAN FASTENERS, NO.
see Polish newspapers and the program of German "greens" 2-4 years ago

[rocket757]

It seemed to some that this was how they would move Gazprom's interests, and then came zhu zhu zhu, hot summer, and then, no one knows what winter will come !!!

[antivirus]

according to popular beliefs - for a hot "good" summer, the same frosty "not summer" should come

[Voltsky]

The young man once wrote that before dinner, do not read Soviet newspapers, and do not watch Soviet news.
Well, take away the word "Soviet", and do everything else as in the council, and life will be more pleasant.

[Machito]

For so many years the European Union has been spreading rot against Gazprom, and now they are surprised: why is it that Gazprom does not go to meet their Wishlist.

[hrych]

A gas station country ... namely, the United States (right words of Korotchenko), having high prices for LNG, everything is sent to the Asia-Pacific region and there is simply nothing superfluous for the EU. Therefore, the Merkel-Biden deal was a compromise, where ... they did not care much about the young, Ukrainian democracy. LNG prices are multiples of pipe prices, only even higher and that's it ... Asia eats everything up. Usually at this time, the EU, using seasonal cheapness, fills the storage facilities for the winter. And here they do not just fill, but take away the leftovers. Gazprom started repairing SP-1, let's not blame it, but there was an accident at the Gazprom plant "in time". For some reason, Yamal-Europe is not going to increase the capacity, and now the Ukrainian gas transportation system ... Why pump too much when you can pump less but for the same price and also not spend money on transit. There was such a nuclear blackmail, now we see gas blackmail, and even profitable. Where does Gretta Tumberg look, where are the sacred windmills that will save Europe

[Voltsky]

In America, by the way, I have not met gas stoves, and as for wind turbines and other green crap, this is a corrupt deal for the sake of loud, in about the same style as the story with freon. For the so-called carbon footprint, and these know what the plants eat ?!

[Luminman]

In America, by the way, I have not met gas stoves

In bulk. And then there are gas boilers and power plants.

[Voltsky]

it is clear about the station, but I have not seen the plates, well, in theory they should be of course, I just have never seen them.

[rocket757]

Come on, they are shown in the movies ...

[Voltsky]

In the movies, hot heifers, and macho dorks are shown. But how does this relate to the real world?
A gas pipeline is more expensive than a power line

[Luminman]

A gas pipeline is more expensive than a power line

There, near each house, there is a large gas cylinder that looks like a large nesting doll. Or a gas tank underground

[Voltsky]

no, mostly electric stoves, few people bother. Balons only we saw, in the villages

[ccsr]

Quote: Luminman

There, near each house, there is a large gas cylinder that looks like a large nesting doll. Or a gas tank underground

I saw this in Germany thirty years ago - there were large gas cylinders in the private sector, and it was very profitable, because one gas filling was enough for a long time. I think that in America a similar picture is not a new idea in itself, especially for remote settlements and taking into account the price of electricity.

[FrankyStein]

I don’t know how in Germany, but in Russia it is more expensive to heat with liquefied gas than with electricity. I had a 3 kW gas convector from a cylinder powered, 4,5 cylinders per 20m2 burst a month. Refueling one 1000 rub. Total 4500 per month. I went to Leroy, bought a 3,3 kW electric gun, connected it through a thermostat, total less than 2000 rubles per month.

[ccsr]

Quote: FrankyStein

I had a 3 kW gas convector from a cylinder powered, 4,5 cylinders per 20m2 burst a month. Refueling one 1000 rub.

Because of the small volume of the balloon, this is ineffective. And when the cylinder is made of a pipe of 1420 mm and a length of 2-3 meters and is installed in the yard, then one charge will be enough there for a long time.

https://images.ru.prom.st/874097378_w640_h640_gazgolder-nazemnoj-gorizontalnyj.jpg

Quote: FrankyStein

Went to Leroy bought an electric gun

Can you also heat food and water with a cannon?

[rocket757]

Any power engineer will tell you that the PRICE - efficiency ratio is better for gas appliances.
In simple terms, gas is, in many cases, PROFITABLE.

[Voltsky]

then tell me how energetics :)

Quote: rocket757

Any power engineer will tell you that the PRICE - efficiency ratio is better for gas appliances.
In simple terms, gas is, in many cases, PROFITABLE.

What did you get a diploma for? :) or just don't understand the USA? :)

[dauria]

then tell me how energetics :)

Well, this is possible in the USA. There is no stove, but electricity is more needed for the air conditioner. But in Norway, even a millionaire cannot afford to bask in electricity. Burn gas at a power plant, get 50-55 percent efficiency. Transfer it by wire, convert it and turn it back into heat ... Hmm .... It's easier to heat boiling water on gas and deliver it in pots - there are less losses. Therefore, wealthy Scandinavians on the ranch have personal boilers on waste engine oils, rags and sawdust .... Losses in a pipe from a thermal power plant do not exceed 30% even on soaring, hissing pipes from the times of the USSR. Which, moreover, usefully warm dogs, homeless people and basements with entrances for free.

[Voltsky]

so it is already more logical.
True, the efficiency is already slightly higher, about 70%.

Quote: dauria

wealthy Scandinavians have personal boilers on their "ranches" on used engine oils, rags and sawdust ....

and I heard about kizlyaks, but did not see.

[Egor53]

Winnie, don't tell stories. Used engine oil has long been banned from use as heating oil in all EU countries. By the way, in Russia too. I work in this area.

[Kot_Kuzya]

Quote: Egor53

Winnie, don't tell stories. Used engine oil has long been banned from use as heating oil in all EU countries.

Let me tell you a terrible secret: Norway is not a member of the EU ... Suddenly, huh? Norwegians just do not want to join the EU, so as not to infringe upon themselves to please the officials from Brussels.

[Voltsky]

Sorry, but I'm more than sure that I didn't write about butter

[rocket757]

Quote: dauria

Well, this is possible in the USA. There is no stove, but electricity is more needed for the air conditioner.

It all depends on local conditions ... in Maine, a stove, heating is very necessary, but you can do without an air conditioner.

Quote: dauria

Burn gas at a power plant, get 50-55 percent efficiency. Wire it up, convert it and turn it back into heat ... Hmm

Everyone always considers, first of all, and only then they decide what is profitable ...
This is not a technical issue, probably accounting here, costs in the first place.
There may be an option ... or rather, no options, autonomous heat - electricity supply. Option for liquefied gas or liquid fuel, which is more economical, more convenient?

[rocket757]

Quote: Voletsky

What did you get a diploma for? :)

Incorrectly expressed .... the question is not for the energy sector, but for an accountant or someone who has a choice about how to heat the room, what to cook on, and so on. The question of costs and ease of use ... gas has one positive quality, it is EASY to transport it anywhere, it is enough to have any transport route !!! oh yes, it can be STORED in storage or transport containers ...
It will be more accurate.
For the price ... it depends on many reasons, for example, living in the vicinity of a hydroelectric power station, having low electricity prices and reliability of supply, you do not need to think about gas, and in many other cases, pipeline gas is much more profitable.

Quote: Voletsky

or just in the USA we don't understand?:

And what, there are fundamental differences from other countries in terms of pricing ??? costs of the consumer of resources?
There, as elsewhere, it all depends on LOCAL conditions ... for example, why do you need heating in Miami ??? in Maine, do you really need a backyard pool?

[Voltsky]

I don’t get into this game, so there’s nothing to say, because I don’t have the amount of data.

[rocket757]

This is not a game, this is life ... technical and economic calculation (FER) as an important criterion, as taught, in general.

[Egor53]

Efficiency with gas heating is 2 (or even more) times LOWER than with electric heating. Only to obtain this electricity, you need to use steam turbines (both at thermal power plants, at nuclear power plants), and they have an efficiency of about 40%.
For the price, gas and electric heating are approximately equal. I speak with professional knowledge of this matter.
The United States is supplied with gas one and a half times less than Russia. And the EU countries lag behind Russia by 4 times in gasification.

[rocket757]

Quote: Egor53

For the price, gas and electric heating are approximately equal.

It all depends on the price of energy and of course on the climatic zone !!!
In the south, it makes no sense to get involved with gas ... in our country, without serious insulation, heating, it is impossible to survive anywhere.

[Mikhail3]

Professional knowledge? I wonder in what area))
A low-power boiler loses a maximum of 20% of its heat with flue gases. That is, 80% of the heat of combustion of the fuel goes to heating the house.
An energy boiler has the same losses somewhere at the level of 5%, which is 15% more profitable, right? Alas, at least 40% of heat is lost during the production of electricity. In total, 45% of the heat is lost in the production of electricity. To heat a house with gas means to lose at least 25% less heat.
It is more profitable to heat with gas by a quarter) This is something like a principle PROFESSIONAL calculation. The actual calculation will also take into account the accompanying losses of the energy redistribution, which will add, roughly, another 10 percent, so it is generally more profitable to heat gas by 35 percent.
Everything else goes beyond the energy sector, and already depends on the gas tariffs set for power plants and private consumers, as well as electricity tariffs for private traders. This is a different calculation, here you need the profession of an accountant. Something I do not observe in your answers either an engineering approach or an accounting one))

[YuryPVO]

Here, just, there are a lot of gas stoves in America. There are several huge gas tanks around Boston for storing LNG. They are painted very nicely. These are now art objects. I personally watched the painting.

[antivirus]

high fertility in Asia - and suddenly !! huge volumes of gas are needed there.
no population growth, no optimism.
there is picking in feces and looking for savings of 0.3-04%
optimism and confidence in a bright future left Europe. and gas followed by optimism

[Sergej1972]

It depends on what kind of Asia. The PRC, Japan, South Korea have a very low birth rate.

[Egor53]

Europe will always need gas. Gas in Southeast Asia is more expensive simply because most of it is delivered there in the form of LNG - and this is an additional cost of $ 100 - $ 150/1000 cubic meters.

[Bad_gr]

Quote: hrych

There was such a nuclear blackmail, now we see gas blackmail, and even profitable.

Where did you see the gas blackmail? It is Europe that presses on us, demanding compulsory pumping through Ukraine, which is not at all profitable for us, since Ukraine has hammered the price for pumping to the maximum. It is much easier and cheaper for us to supply directly to the consumer, without intermediaries. But Europe has come up with rules for itself, according to which the volume of gas pumped through the Nord Stream is limited. Now the noose, which they invented for themselves, made, and hung around the neck slightly tightened. And where is our blackmail here? I don’t like to take gas from us, take it from Scandinavians or from Asia, Africa. We did not arrange blockades for anyone, the choice is up to the consumer.

[Egor53]

I just see the gas blackmail, and with great joy.
Well, why should Gazprom try to strain and supply the gas necessary for the EU. We can wait until all gas storage facilities in the EU are empty. The gas price in the EU will jump to $ 1000/1000 cubic meters, or even more. Then we can talk to these women of easy virtue with the letter b (EU countries).

[rocket757]

Quote: hrych

Where does Gretta Tumberg look

Can you guess what ... hole they put it in?

[hrych]

Quote: rocket757

Can you guess what ... hole they put it in?

Afghanistan. Kandahar

[smart ass]

As a result, Volodka and Gazprom again outplayed everyone. Ancient ukram will have to heat the stoves with books by Gebels.

[Voltsky]

But what's the point? :) Tariffs have grown and will continue to grow, gasoline has risen in price and will continue to rise.

[lucul]

But what's the point? :) Tariffs have grown and will continue to grow, gasoline has risen in price and will continue to rise.

Dollar inflation, what do you want)))

[Alex Nevs]

You see, you don’t know .. There is Energetic Willow. They began to grow. And Valtzman "goodbye ....". Let the praises sing to the waltzman now.

[Voltsky]

I live in Europe, but I am registered in Latvia ... believe me, not everything that your "non-engaging media" is broadcasting is true. In other matters, the same applies to ours. Well, as I understand it, it is difficult for people to take a visa and go to see, in order to see everything as it is; and begin to carry all nonsense.

[Xlor]

Ancient ukram will have to heat the stoves with Gebels books

Let them drown with history textbooks, where it is written about the 145-year history of Ukraine, beginning with the Big Bang ...

[smart ass]

How did the ancient Ukrainians tame the first dinosaur?

[Cheshire]

Quote: Clever man

How did the ancient Ukrainians tame the first dinosaur?

Yes, it happened by itself, in the process of digging the Black Sea.
Somehow .

[smart ass]

But weren't the ancient Scythians-Rusichs enslaved the proud nation of Ukrov and forced them to dig the Black Sea, threatening and grassing with evil bears?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Cheshire

Yes, it happened by itself, in the process of digging the Black Sea.

This is how they dug it:

[Ros 56]

Ukrainians, to hell with them, I'm worried about the Tribals, but how will they live with such a price for gas?

[Sibguest]

Yes, it turned out awkward.
Why cheat people?
There will be no gas for 600 euros, cubic meters .... it will be at 750 euros .... oh.

[Maz]

Sunshine, look until you erased it from YouTube

[And Us Rat]

There is also a point of view that Gazprom artificially reduces gas pumping in an effort to show Europe that it cannot do without Nord Stream 2.

A logical knight's move.

[210ox]

Right. And on the head.

[tralflot1832]

I'll try to bring the figures in the article into real correspondence. In August a day, Gazprom pumped 124 million cubic meters a day through Ukraine, in September it will be 110 million a day. And no violations of the contract for Ukraine 40 billion a year. Germans and Norgi analysts saw the light of gas. Europe, for its indulgence of Russophobia, sits on a kukan at Gazprom, and everything is legal. And winter is getting closer every day. Gazprom has increased the pumping through the Turkish stream 2 times, and fills its storage facilities in Russia. This price is not yet the limit. SP 1 is loaded at 108% capacity, I am looking for two independent confirmations.

[tralflot1832]

Gazprom has swung at the third energy package of the EU, to show how flawed it is. Gazprom still has gas in gas storage facilities in Europe, you can still play around.

[Brturin]

Quote: tralflot1832

Gazprom still has gas in gas storage facilities in Europe, you can still play around

Gas in storage ... two news ...
Based on the data from Gas Infrastructure Europe, it can be stated that on March 25, the season for gas withdrawal from UGS facilities in Europe ended. The record for the time of publication of open data, since 2011, was raised, the volume of gas - 65,6 billion cubic meters. m "https://tass.ru/ekonomika/11071399
As reported, for the 2020/2021 season, a record 60,957 billion cubic meters were withdrawn from Russian UGS facilities. m of gas with a total level of operating reserves at the beginning of the withdrawal season of 72,322 billion cubic meters. m. https://www.interfax.ru/business/784299 - and further - "As of June 30.06.2021, 25,356, the volume of gas injected into the UGS facility amounted to 2021 billion cubic meters," the company said in its latest quarterly report. Taking into account the target for the winter of 50, by the end of June the filling level of Russian UGS facilities slightly exceeded 47,47%. The level of reserves in UGS facilities in Europe as of the same date was XNUMX%.
Cold Europe is of course, but also loved ones ...
"By the beginning of April, Russian UGS facilities were filled only by 19,3%, so a home campaign (to prepare for the heating season) may be of higher priority than export," ICIS analyst Tom Marsek-Manser wrote on Twitter.
https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2021/08/16/gazprom-obyasnil-kto-emu-vazhnee-evropa-ili-rossiya

[Murmur 55]

It is high time for Gazprom to adopt the tactics of the West, to put pressure on "tender" places and at the same time to smile and assure that everything that is being done for the good of the one who is under pressure. Only there is a question whether ours will go all the way to the end as soon as E.S. begins to wrinkle his brows angrily?

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Murmur 55

It is high time for Gazprom to adopt the tactics of the West, to put pressure on "tender" places

He didn't even push, he just turned away, and ...

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather.

Why won't the EU remember how they resisted the construction of SP-2 and the pumping of full volumes through SP-1 and SP-2?

[Vend]

Quote: ROSS 42

[

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather.

Why won't the EU remember how they resisted the construction of SP-2 and the pumping of full volumes through SP-1 and SP-2?

What do you mean, how can you. Alone there to the west sinless

[culinary]

Quote: ROSS 42

Quote: Murmur 55

It is high time for Gazprom to adopt the tactics of the West, to put pressure on "tender" places

He didn't even push, he just turned away, and ...

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather.

Why won't the EU remember how they resisted the construction of SP-2 and the pumping of full volumes through SP-1 and SP-2?

And also the rejection of long-term contracts and the decoupling from the oil price. Buying futures on TTF ....
This was not done by Gazprom! This was done by the European people themselves.
And now they whine that Russia does not want to supply additional volumes of gas at a loss ...

[Irek]

Svidomnya squeals incessantly.

[Migam]

Began ! Enough to endure theft and humiliation from the Kiev junta ..

[knn54]

Nobody needs to pay for the gas pumped through the SP-2 for transit.

[Old jew]

Gazprom strictly complies with the signed contracts. The case concerns additional bids for the supply over and above the contract. It is on these applications that Gazprom sends everyone to alternative suppliers.

[rocket757]

Gazprom refused to book additional capacities for pumping gas through the Ukrainian gas transportation system

... What's wrong? Ah, ah, Geyrope does not want to stay without gas for the winter ... ah, ah, ah, what a shame.

[Alexander 3]

I support the actions of GAZPROM as many sanctions can be applied only against Russia. Let them familiarize themselves with ours.

[Voltsky]

Sometimes it's even surprising how one bruised neighbor around the corner can ruin everyone's life, I hope Kiev will be hanged on a bitch for testicles

[fa2998]

I think Gazprom teaches Europe to sit still, wait for the SP-2 to start working. And there will be an abundance of gas, and prices will fall. Europe itself stepped on the rake, then sanctions, then spawning, etc., interfered with the construction of the gas pipeline. -2 is not ready, we can fit the gas carrier, but the tariffs there are different.

[Scharnhorst]

Gazprom - keep it up!

[White man]

I think the main question is again in Miller's lawyers: prices are prices, so that one does not have to lose in courts again for violations of contracts, etc. And then pay the next billions

[Piramidon]

Quote: White man

I think the main question is again in Miller's lawyers: prices are prices, so that one does not have to lose in courts again for violations of contracts, etc. And then pay the next billions

And what agreements were violated? All deliveries are made according to contracts. But they can count on additional ones with good behavior.

[White man]

Recently, the Poles received 1,8 billion. Khokhlam lost all or almost all of the courts. Extension of the transit agreement up to 24 years inclusive - consequence. Until now, dances with tambourines for compensation have not ended.

[ccsr]

Quote: White man

Until now, dances with tambourines for compensation have not ended.

You would be better off calculating how much Gazprom has already earned from the current rise in gas prices, and how much it has saved by reducing transit through Ukraine, and then you will understand that in the final balance sheet it is just covered in chocolate. And the courts are not over yet - so it may not be so bad for Gazprom in the future.
By the way, all those who, two years ago, convinced us that the SP-2 would never be built - where are you "prophets", have disappeared somewhere:

As of 13:00 Moscow time on 13.08.2021/XNUMX/XNUMX.
Over the past day, "Fortuna" has covered 1042 meters, there was one stop.
In total, 17686 meters remain to be laid, of which 3796 are in the Danish EEZ.
"Academician Chersky" stands in the same place.
There was a regrouping of ships, the "Murman" leaves for Rostock.
The research vessel continues to work in the area.
Also, a vessel with soil for filling pipes (FLINTSTONE, previously it was already used in this area) is moving into the area.

[White man]

Let's hope. Taking into account that the new civilian president does not bother us yet.

[Viktor Sergeev]

Let others buy back, the market is big.

[From Tomsk]

And where did the American LNG with the molecules of freedom go? Why is America missing out on a chance to move Gazprom in the European market? Where is Euro-Atlantic solidarity, after all?))

[Murmur 55]

American LNG cheerfully scratches to Asia, there is a lot more to pay, and the "allies" in Europe WHILE grind down, or let them beat the price (if they can), wait Washington will declare that Moscow is to blame.

[Podvodnik]

American LNG Cheerfully Carding to Asia

Interestingly, where is our LNG scratching?

[Egor53]

The USA practically does not produce LNG. US LNG "exports" are the same as Ukrainian imports of reverse gas from the EU. If LNG is transported by gas carriers owned by American companies, then they consider this to be American exports. And the fact that this LNG is from Yamal ...
Links to US LNG exports are numerous. For some reason, there is no information on LNG production in the United States.

[TermNachTer]

When the Union collapsed, we were told that there would be a free market and it would set the price of goods)))) if the Gay Europeans are not satisfied with the Russian price, let them buy from mattress makers or Arabs)))

[wandlitz]

Gazprom acts as in that old joke: And you walk around the market, maybe someone will sell for a cheaper price ...

[prior]

"Europe has already blamed Gazprom "
Gazprom has long been a national treasure of Germany, so all questions are for Angela Merkel.

[Xlor]

through the Ukrainian gas transportation system

And I thought that for a long time already the skakuasy svidomye sawed it up for scrap ...

[Sasha1979]

Having such a "probable partner" as Ukraine, it is not surprising that Gazprom is looking for any options to avoid cooperation (which has long degenerated into Ukraine's extortion of money from Gazprom). In favor of any other options, no matter what. There is no worse than Ukraine.

[Sands Careers General]

Gazprom refused to book additional capacities for pumping gas through the Ukrainian gas transportation system

Like this! Pissing rags and in the face, and everyone)))
And urine, and the EU and the United States.

[Alexander Seklitsky]

Well, we are ordinary Russians rejoicing at the historical maximum gas price, coming to refuel at the filling station.

[SKVichyakow]

Comrades are walking the right path, i.e. gentlemen. For a long time it was necessary to be independent, and not peering into the eyes of the West: "what will you please?"

[vitvit123]

Quote: Voletsky

A gas pipeline is more expensive than a power line

A strong argument .. everything fell into place at once (sarcasm) ..

[123456789]

Turn off the gas ...
Fragment from the film "The Diamond Arm" 1968

[Ros 56]

And most importantly in the topic.

[sav]

Understood nothing. Gazprom refused to book, so booked ...
So it was or was not?

[svoit]

Well, that's right, the United States also wants to earn extra money on its LNG and sell through terminals in Poland and Latvia a dozen or two billion cubic meters for $ 500, at the same time the price will be dropped.

Quote: wandlitz

And you walk around the market, maybe someone will sell for a cheaper price ...

easily, the United States can sell for a low price, and the great gas-producing country - Hungary - too

[BAI]

1.

thereby raising gas prices by an average of 2,5%.

Less is better, but better. Lenin's behest has not been canceled.
2.

Gazprom artificially reduces gas pumping in an effort to show Europe that it cannot do without Nord Stream 2.

And this is absolutely correct. Better to think about how to cancel the introduced restrictions, and not come up with new ones.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Zadolbal our Gazprom with its pipe and transit! He is not in trend today. Afghanistan is trending today. Especially, passenger air transportation. (On the chassis of liners)

[hagen]

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather.

Some strange accusation. This is a business. There, the desire for cooperation through appeals in the media is not motivated. It is necessary to make offers that the counterparty cannot refuse. For example, offer a good price or conditions equal to other counterparties. And in general, it is necessary to substantively formulate accusations - which positions of which treaty are violated. And there are no concepts cold or hot in contracts ...

[Ros 56]

Europe has already accused Gazprom of unwillingness to increase gas supplies amid the approaching cold weather.

Wouldn't it be better to blame yourself for the arrogant and shameless and senseless accusation of all unthinkable sins on Russia and the imposition of sanctions against it? Now do not fucking scream in a bad voice, for which they fought, they ran into it.

[Silver Fox]

This is not blackmail. And market relations. For example, I will not argue with the owner of the store. If he has two loaves of bread for sale. And I need four loaves. no one is obliged to provide you without a contract.

[yfast]

I support Gazprom, although it can be jumped.

[Sergey Obraztsov]

The shares are already at 299 and have grown 1.5% during the day, they are not going to be corrected yet. For the month, the growth is 7%. For 3 months 32%. Data at the time of writing the comment.

It's only the beginning. A year ago, the Op was about the death of Gazprom as in a winter forest with a full moon. But something went wrong. The amplitude of the liquid in the bottle turned the situation in the opposite direction. Let's see how long it will last.

[yfast]

Quote: Sergey Obraztsov

It's only the beginning. A year ago, the Op was about the death of Gazprom as in a winter forest with a full moon. But something went wrong. ...

Our sexual partners will remember this to Gazprom later, someday.