Uncertain future and limited prospects. Army jetpacks

87

Gravity Jet Suit on trials in the Netherlands, April 2021

Half a century ago, several leading countries were actively involved in the topic of the so-called. jetpacks and other individual aircraft. At that time, technologies did not allow creating such a product with a sufficient level of characteristics, and gradually interest in the direction disappeared. Now new technical and technological capabilities have appeared, which have already become the basis for promising projects. Predictably new jetpacks are grabbing the attention of armies - but their military future is still uncertain.

Perspective sample


Several versions of jetpacks with various features are being developed and tested at once. The British company Gravity Industries Ltd. has achieved the greatest success and fame to date. with his project Jet Suit ("Jet Suit").




Takeoff from a motor boat

"Jet suit" is made in the form factor of a vest and a pair of bracers, connected by flexible sleeves and cables. On the back of the user is the main turbojet engine, which provides flight, and on the hands are located in pairs smaller and more powerful motors needed for stabilization and taxiing. Jet Suit weighs 27 kg; the total engine power reaches 1050 hp. Acceleration up to 85-88 km / h is provided (in the experimental flight they accelerated up to 136 km / h) and flight within 5-10 minutes.

Jet Suit is already on sale to everyone; the company-developer also organized courses for training future "pilots". Recently, GI has also demonstrated its development to government agencies in different countries, incl. the armed forces. Several similar events have taken place in recent months.

Armies study


Earlier this year, GI and the Royal Netherlands Navy Special Operations Forces (NLMARSOF) organized tests of the Jet Suit. Combat training operations were carried out, in which new equipment was used in the most active way.


One second before landing

In mid-April, a video of this exercise was published. A group of NLMARSOF fighters on motor boats approached a merchant ship with a conditional enemy. One of the participants wore a Jet Suit. At a predetermined distance from the ship, he took off, then independently reached the ship and softly landed on the deck. After that, the soldier threw a rope ladder from the side, and his comrades climbed onto the ship to conduct a training battle with a conditional enemy. After that, the "pilot" left the ship and returned to the boat.

In early May, a video of a similar exercise conducted by the Royal Navy and the British Marines was released. They followed the same scenario as in the Netherlands, but with minor differences. So, the landing was carried out not on a merchant ship, but on a battleship - the patrol ship HMS Tamar (P233). In addition, the landing was performed not on the deck, but on the superstructure. After the battle, three pilots immediately landed on the helipad.


Fly again

The Pentagon is also showing interest in the subject of jetpacks. In March, the advanced development agency DARPA launched a program to study this direction. In the near future, it was planned to accept applications from developers of such equipment, and then conduct evaluative and comparative tests. Several American and foreign organizations were expected to participate in the program.

After determining the circle of participants, the first phase of the research and development program will begin, for which six months are allocated, according to March reports. At this stage, participants will be able to receive assistance in the amount of $ 225 thousand. The most successful samples will move on to the next stage and receive an additional $ 1,5 million. Gravity Industries Ltd.


British Trials May 2021

Non-military structures are also showing interest in jetpacks. Last September, the GI product was tested by the Great North Air Ambulance Service, a British rescue service. With his help, the paramedic was able to find a conditional victim in a hard-to-reach area in just one and a half minutes, provide the necessary assistance, and also prepare him for evacuation. In general, the "suit" was highly appreciated.

Benefits and Limitations


Jetpacks have a number of important features that should be useful in various fields, incl. in the army. At the same time, despite all the progress in recent years, significant shortcomings remain that hinder their implementation and full use. Perhaps, in the future, it will be possible to get a better balance of pros and cons, which will lead to a change in the situation.

The main advantage of the jetpack is the increase in human mobility without the use of "traditional" aircraft. A fighter or rescuer can independently fly and carry some payload, regardless of other equipment. In addition, the portable aircraft is more compact than other models, it is characterized by increased maneuverability, etc.


Takeoff, view from a different angle

Modern technologies and components make it possible to obtain sufficiently high flight performance. Jet Suit is the most successful modern model in its class and surpasses similar designs of the past in its main characteristics. It can be expected that in the future, designs will become even more perfect and will show higher performance.

At the same time, the available parameters impose serious restrictions on the operation. The flight duration is no more than 5-10 minutes, depending on the speed, seriously limits the range and operational radius. As practice shows, a jetpack will help to catch up with the departing ship by air, but the transfer of soldiers over long distances remains impossible.

The carrying capacity of the backpacks is still limited, which will cause the rescuer or paratrooper equipment to be reduced. This will keep the flight performance at an acceptable level, but will noticeably hit the operational and combat efficiency.


A fighter with a Jet Suit is chasing a battle ship

In a military context, a big problem is the survivability and combat stability of jetpacks. A flying fighter turns out to be a fairly simple target, and special means are not required to defeat him, a rifle is enough weapons... At the same time, it will not be easy to protect the paratrooper from bullets. Bullet-proof vest, helmet and other products are perhaps the heaviest piece of equipment that can go beyond the carrying capacity of the aircraft.

The survivability of modern backpacks based on turbojet engines also leaves much to be desired. Any bullet is capable of causing fatal damage to the engine or fuel tank, provoking the destruction of the structure, fire and death of the paratrooper. The need to provide sufficient protection is again faced with the problem of carrying capacity.

[Center]

Landing on the superstructure[/ Center]

Limited perspectives


Thus, the jetpacks of the latest models in their characteristics and capabilities surpass the developments of the past, and also show their wide possibilities of application for peaceful and military purposes. All this becomes a reason for optimism and allows developers to talk about the greatest future for their products.

However, a more thorough study of the topic shows that a number of specific questions and problems still remain in the field of individual aircraft. Some of them make it difficult to introduce new technologies in certain areas, while others hinder the development of the direction as a whole. It is not known whether it will be possible to deal with all these problems in the foreseeable future and at an acceptable price.


Flights as part of the Great North Air Ambulance Service test, September 2020

It can be assumed that the existing and developed samples really have certain practical prospects. They are quite capable of finding applications in different areas, but in certain areas, much progress is not expected. Perhaps these are only temporary problems, although the fundamental impossibility of effectively using jetpacks for some tasks cannot be ruled out.

Recent demonstration tests show that the "Jet Suit" copes with the role of sports equipment for extreme athletes, and is also useful in providing assistance, even with some restrictions. Military use remains questionable. Recent exercises showed the general capabilities of the Gravity Jet Suit, but did not take into account all the possible and characteristic threats and risks. The practical and theoretical value of such tests is at least ambiguous.


The victim was found and will soon receive help

It should be noted that the DARPA agency recently joined the study of the subject of jetpacks. In the near future, it plans to study all available proposals and ideas, conduct full-scale tests of equipment and draw conclusions about the military prospects of the direction. Such news are of great interest.

It is possible that the developments of commercial organizations and the supervision of the Pentagon will finally lead to the emergence of a full-fledged army jetpack. However, it cannot be ruled out that the American research program will come to negative conclusions, and the curious direction will again be abandoned. In any case, DARPA will make every effort and draw the most objective conclusions. In addition, the agency will set an example for other countries that do not yet know whether to pursue an ambiguous but interesting direction.
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 August 2021 05: 07
    flight within 5-10 minutes.
    Technically very far from "Iron Man" No.
    1. +6
      11 August 2021 05: 19
      Fuel is not suitable, gravity is needed.
      1. +3
        11 August 2021 05: 21
        Quote: Pessimist22
        gravity is needed.

        There is on Plyuk - you need two boxes of CC apiece ... winked
        1. +3
          11 August 2021 19: 37
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          Quote: Pessimist22
          gravity is needed.

          There is on Plyuk - you need two boxes of CC apiece ... winked

          Only half of the CC. On Plyuk. Or 2200 chats.

          Galina Borisovna! Comrade Mashkov and I, like guys, could receive two chatlets per performance, this is the maximum. Water, luts and fines for ecylopps are at least chatl per day. And gravity is half a KC! These are two thousand two hundred chatlets. Divide by 365, subtract Saturday-Sunday, we get 6. So, earlier than six years later, I could not return! "
          “Everything is so, only
      2. -4
        11 August 2021 06: 09
        With or without gravity - a target for hunters!
        In the 80s, one with a sawn-off shotgun in the south of the USSR captured the An-24. The cockpit is behind the armored door, he threatens to shoot the steward. The co-pilot was a hunter, we agreed with the commander. The second goes to the hijacker in the trunk, on the floor there is a handle-bracket at the hatch, he stretches his leg into it, the commander gives the steering wheel away from him and hangs up the "terrorist". A shot sounds, the second comes in. Commander: "How is it?" Second: "in flight!"
        It is easier and cheaper to use a silent parachute at night. wink
        1. -1
          11 August 2021 06: 53
          What kind of jetpacks can we talk about))), if until now "The drone is a product for a circle of children's aircraft modeling", "Your kompukter cannot dig a trench and does not salute", "Your stealth is visible through binoculars" and the rest "bullet is a fool - well done bayonet ".
          1. 0
            11 August 2021 07: 50
            Quote: Civil
            What kind of jetpacks can we talk about))), if until now "The drone is a product for a circle of children's aircraft modeling", "Your kompukter cannot dig a trench and does not salute", "Your stealth is visible through binoculars" and the rest "bullet is a fool - well done bayonet ".

            The thing is that due to various circumstances, incl. political and economic, our country found itself on the sidelines of world technical progress, which caused a "exacerbation" of militant unhealthy conservatism in the population, therefore, scientific and technical achievements in other countries, for example, a mask, are often perceived with hostility, hence everything is correct - a bullet is a fool - bayonet well done, sadness ...
            1. -4
              11 August 2021 08: 07
              Quote: Stroporez
              our country found itself on the sidelines of global technical progress

              How about the "cartoons" that Putin showed and made the West howl?

              Quote: Stroporez
              e.g. mask,

              Everyone can make a tin can, but not everyone can launch it into space. On what engines does his "invention" fly?

              ps
              "US Hudson Institute: If Missile Defense System Cannot Defend, Is Such a System Necessary"
              https://topwar.ru/185812-institut-gudzona-ssha-esli-sistema-pro-ne-mozhet-zaschitit-to-nuzhna-li-takaja-sistema.html
              1. +2
                11 August 2021 08: 22
                Quote: Boris55
                How about the "cartoons" that Putin showed and made the West howl?

                "... Everywhere we hear groans ..." (c)
                https://youtu.be/0fXAyKChyXY
                Quote: Boris55
                Everyone can make a tin can, but not everyone can launch it into space. On what engines does his "invention" fly?

                Boris, your tinfoil hat lets in TV radiation, try galvanizing.
                1. -3
                  11 August 2021 08: 34
                  Quote: Stroporez
                  "... Everywhere we hear groans ..." (c)

                  Self-critical, I approve. laughing

                  Quote: Stroporez
                  the foil cap transmits TV radiation

                  The link in the comment above to the fact that our inventions, in their opinion, nullified their air defense and which they gladly infuse Ukraine, you certainly have not read.
                  1. 0
                    11 August 2021 08: 48
                    Quote: Boris55
                    The link in the comment above to the fact that our inventions, in their opinion, nullified their air defense and which they gladly infuse Ukraine, you certainly have not read.

                    I know a few things / people / inventions that have been zeroed out, but how does all this relate to jetpacks? request
                    Well, perhaps, you have invented a knapsack that will not knock down the enemy's air defense.
                    Boris, where are you going to fly ??? belay
                    1. +1
                      11 August 2021 08: 50
                      Quote: Stroporez
                      just how does all this relate to jetpacks?

                      This is a dead-end branch with no perspective.

                      More efficient, less noise, easier to operate:



                      Or this one:

                      1. +5
                        11 August 2021 09: 05
                        why so many screws? just a two-carrier and pushing gyroplane is enough! Easy to operate! German one 20 years ago showed! gyroplane from one tube! and everything is installed on this pipe!
                      2. +1
                        11 August 2021 15: 22
                        Quote: serg.shishkov2015
                        why so many screws? just a two-carrier and pushing gyroplane is enough! Easy to operate! German one 20 years ago showed! gyroplane from one tube! and everything is installed on this pipe!

                        Krasava is my favorite la! And I never flew it! sad
                      3. +2
                        11 August 2021 17: 25
                        The gyroplane has its own niche - it needs a running start.
                      4. 0
                        12 August 2021 05: 45
                        this German's takeoff run was only a few meters! threw the pedals and the handle and so flew on the midget! the beauty!
                      5. 0
                        12 August 2021 11: 23
                        this German's takeoff run was only a few meters!
                        And yet this is a runaway. The gyroplane also does not have a hover mode. That is why the gyroplane has a slightly different application niche.
                      6. 0
                        12 August 2021 11: 42
                        but there are jump start gyroplanes!
                      7. -1
                        11 August 2021 09: 06
                        Quote: Boris55
                        This is a dead-end branch with no perspective.

                        Many believed that the ideas of Tsialkovsky and Tesla were completely unpromising, and if someone told me in 1986 that in 35 years I would communicate with friends on my pocket TV (smartphone), I would laugh. And now it is a reality and even your protégé, the president, keeps up with the times, communicating with his subordinates, the people and the whole world in the mode of video communication and press conferences. And what will you say if he suddenly looks at a jetpack for flying among birds?
                      8. -2
                        12 August 2021 08: 15
                        Quote: Stroporez
                        And what will you say if he suddenly looks at a jetpack for flying among birds?

                        This backpack is perfect for circus performances and Hollywood fiction, requiring incredible concentration. One has only to blink and you are already a grilled steak on the ground.
          2. +3
            11 August 2021 09: 25
            Quote: Civil
            What jetpacks can we talk about

            As a child, I flew in a dream -
            In the warm blue silence
            The city slept peacefully -
            And I flew.

            Chorus:
            I was alone in the whole world,
            Hair and thoughts were confused by the wind,
            Hair and thoughts were confused by the wind,
            He called me with him.
            And happy, weightless,
            I flew alone over the sleepy world
            I flew alone over the sleepy world
            I flew in the starry sky.
        2. -2
          11 August 2021 07: 04
          Quote: Babay Atasovich
          Simpler and cheaper silent parachute at night

          Are there noisy parachutes? belay
          1. +4
            11 August 2021 07: 30
            There are such
            1. +4
              11 August 2021 07: 43
              Quote: Avior
              There are such

              There are, only this is no longer a pure parachute and they are called paralets, motorized parachutes, airchutes. Yes
          2. +2
            11 August 2021 15: 24
            Quote: Stroporez
            Quote: Babay Atasovich
            Simpler and cheaper silent parachute at night

            Are there noisy parachutes? belay

            Yes to go nuts - with a siren !!!! laughing
            1. +2
              11 August 2021 15: 47
              Quote: Babay Atasovich
              Yes to go nuts - with a siren !!!!

              Often the airborne person plays the role of a siren! wassat
      3. +3
        11 August 2021 07: 14
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        Technically very far from "Iron Man"

        This video is 6 years old
        And this is without jet thrust
        The world is moving forward!
      4. +1
        11 August 2021 14: 18
        Quote: Pessimist22
        Fuel is not suitable, gravity is needed.

        I have a couple of boxes of CC, I can sell .......
    2. AUL
      +3
      11 August 2021 07: 15
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      Jet Suit weighs 27 kg; total engine power reaches 10500 hp
      It's not a mistake?
      1. +1
        11 August 2021 14: 27
        Quote from AUL
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        Jet Suit weighs 27 kg; total engine power reaches 10500 hp
        It's not a mistake?

        Of course a mistake, with such power he would spit out all the fuel in a second
        But if that's not your style, go get yourself a copy of Richard Browning's Gravity / Daedalus jet suit, and fly it wherever you dare. This 1,050-hp (783-kW) beauty is on sale on a rack in Selfridges, London, for £ 340,000 (approx. US $ 447,000).

        1. +3
          11 August 2021 17: 28
          Of course a mistake, with such power he would spit out all the fuel in a second
          With this weight and power, this is an ordinary land mine. Starts very quickly. Truth only once. And the pilot lands, albeit relatively soft, but highly fragmented.
    3. +2
      11 August 2021 08: 36
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      flight within 5-10 minutes.
      Technically very far from "Iron Man" No.

      Well, not so far, given the speed of the NTP, remember 100 years ago, the flight of at least some kind of aircraft was an incredible sight and messages were sent over copper wires using a binary code
  2. 0
    11 August 2021 05: 16
    Such a weapon should be made on the basis of anti-gravity phenomena, but, alas, science is still very, very far from this. You can only read about this only in science fiction novels ...
    1. AUL
      +4
      11 August 2021 07: 19
      There is a stupa with Baba-Yagoya ...
  3. +3
    11 August 2021 05: 24
    The engine power is an order of magnitude less, 1050 hp.
    1. 0
      11 August 2021 05: 41
      Those. do you want to tell me that there is an error in the article? Did I understand you correctly?
      1. +3
        11 August 2021 05: 58
        Exactly. Extra zero.
        1. +1
          11 August 2021 05: 59
          Weird. I thought there were wildly smart specialists working at VO! wassat
          1. +2
            11 August 2021 07: 49
            Smart, smart ...
            But terribly inattentive :)
    2. +2
      11 August 2021 07: 12
      Also confused by the power in the article. And then the phrase that it is limited in carrying capacity. With this power.
  4. +3
    11 August 2021 05: 32
    Any system using human legs as a chassis is doomed and will only be useful to extreme sportsmen.
    1. +2
      11 August 2021 06: 11
      A parachute, for example, is quite used for themselves even with minimal training.
      1. 0
        11 August 2021 06: 16
        The parachute is designed for a soft landing at a constant speed and for the parachutist to fall on his side. This reactive bullshit is clearly not going to work that way.
        1. 0
          11 August 2021 07: 23
          With a knapsack, this is potentially much easier. Unlike a parachute in a knapsack, you can adjust the landing speed, over time, most likely, automation will be added
          1. -1
            11 August 2021 07: 37
            Quote: Avior
            Unlike a parachute in a knapsack, you can adjust the landing speed, over time, most likely, automation will be added

            Of course they will add, because technical progress is now developing at a fantastic rate. Who would have thought, except for science fiction writers 30 years ago, about a car without a driver, for example, but now it is a reality.
            1. 0
              11 August 2021 07: 45
              For the time being, enthusiasts are actually engaged in these knapsacks, if the military is seriously engaged, they will clearly add to the technical level.
    2. +3
      11 August 2021 06: 40
      Quote: Sahalinets
      Any system using human legs as a chassis
      But the main thing here is not the legs, but judging by the description, the hands are busy. In fact, it is a helpless, in-flight, and perfectly audible and visible target.
      1. 0
        11 August 2021 07: 26
        It is far from always necessary to go on an attack under enemy fire, there are other uses.
        1. +1
          11 August 2021 07: 30
          Quote: Avior
          It is far from always necessary to go on an attack under enemy fire, there are other uses.
          Yes, I do not argue, but the system is not for mass and even more widespread use.
          1. +1
            11 August 2021 07: 47
            That's for sure, with checkers they will not fly into attack, until rather for special use.
            But if they add power and automation, it will be possible to use the bulletproof vest and free their hands, and the range will grow - the scope of application will expand. Drone control technology just begs there.
            1. +1
              11 August 2021 17: 32
              But if they add power and automation, it will be possible to use a bulletproof vest and free their hands, and the range will grow - the scope of application will expand.
              Yes. And it will be called Mi-24/28, Apache or Ka-50/52
              1. +2
                11 August 2021 18: 10
                I think it won’t reach this
                And the armor will be made of light, but expensive materials - in this case, the cost is high, justified, and the weapon will be lighter, and the fuel will be made of better quality.
                It's just that the military has not yet undertaken this.
                1. 0
                  11 August 2021 18: 21
                  It's just that the military has not yet undertaken this.
                  It's just that work against gravity, although very honorable, is extremely exhausting. Especially for fuel. Therefore, whatever the military does there, the result will be extremely limited. Until the very invention of gravity or the overwhelming anti-gravity.
                  1. +1
                    11 August 2021 18: 54
                    There are no limitless results, they are always limited.
                    In any case, there would have been an improvement.
    3. +3
      11 August 2021 07: 21
      Quote: Sahalinets
      Any system using human legs as a chassis is doomed and will only be useful to extreme sportsmen.

      So, an easy excursion into the history of accidents
      According to the Spanish publication Elnuevodia, the accident occurred at the amusement park on December 4, 2019. The jetpack was operated by a 49-year-old pilot named Kelman James Riches, who came from the US state of Florida. During the flight, the jetpack exploded for unknown reasons and the extreme fell to the ground from at least a 6-meter height. He was immediately taken to the hospital, but he died from his injuries. As harsh as it sounds, the jetpack fatal was bound to happen someday. The fact is that falls when flying on jetpacks are far from uncommon, therefore in most cases, flights are carried out over the surface of the water. The fact that the deceased Kelman Riches flew over the amusement park is a great rarity and the organizers were clearly aware of the danger of an extreme act. Fortunately, at the time of the fall of the extreme, there were practically no visitors left in the park. The jetpack at one time crippled even its own inventor, Wendell Moore. In 1961, during tests, the inventor of the jetpack injured his leg and testing had to be carried out by his assistant Harold Graham. It was he who became the first person to fly on a jetpack, but over the decades of this technology's existence, the safety problem has not yet been resolved. Despite this, in 2019, French inventor Frankie Zapata decided to fly a jetpack from France to the UK across the English Channel. You probably already guessed or know that this flight did not go without an unforeseen situation. The fact is that halfway through the journey, the pilot had to refuel his satchel by boarding the ship. However, he miscalculated the trajectory, missed and fell straight into the water. Fortunately, Frankie Zapata did not receive any serious injuries. It is noteworthy that these are far from the only accidents with jetpacks. At one time, extreme sportsman Richard Browning fell into the water, and the pilot from the American Apollo project completely fell to the ground and broke his jaw and ribs.
  5. +2
    11 August 2021 05: 49
    ***
    The drones froze ...
    ***
  6. +1
    11 August 2021 05: 54
    there are a lot of ideas ..))) the military takes many things from our fairy tales)))
    for our ancestors it was the norm ... but now everything is brought into fairy tales))


  7. +2
    11 August 2021 07: 46
    They turned it down. 10500 hp. Judging by the speeds and carrying capacity, no more than 105. Yes, and this is doubtful, it rips off his hands. Well, the danger of such a device for its carrier is great. A fall from a height of even 20 meters for a pilot is fraught with serious injuries or death. No life-saving appliances are provided. No, "not a miracle" ...
  8. +1
    11 August 2021 08: 21
    Non-military structures are also showing interest in jetpacks.

    So let them be interested.
    For some reason, the speed is 87 km / h and the maximum flight range of 22, 666 km is not convincing. There are more effective means of stealth and quiet movement.
    And the fulfillment of a combat mission should not depend on the whims of technical support. It's too early to talk about the glory of "Iron Man".
    1. +1
      11 August 2021 08: 28
      Very useful sometimes
      For example, quickly take a dominant height, with a knapsack it is easy and quick, and with legs it is much more difficult
  9. -2
    11 August 2021 09: 46
    This is how you need to be podzadornov in order to attach the turbines to your hands ... !!!
    Absolutely and real - tuuupppporyyylyeeee ... and this is great !!!
  10. +2
    11 August 2021 10: 01
    Several versions of jetpacks with various features are being developed and tested at once.

    Such a knapsack was suitable for reconnaissance and sabotage work, if it was silent and would stand out in the infrared range.
  11. +1
    11 August 2021 10: 14
    It seems to me that, in the foreseeable future, much progress is not expected. Some kind of breakthrough technology must appear. The first knapsack flew in 1961, that is, for 60 years, they have not advanced much forward.
  12. +1
    11 August 2021 10: 53
    All this pampering, iris! They're furious with fat! What example are being set for pioneers? That "Pencil case", then "Satchel", then a fountain pen ... ugh, what a disgrace !? And what, in the end, did the paraglider, the mini-motodeltoplane, the mini-gyroplane fail? Ischo in the 30s of the last century dabbled in aircrafts! So no! Give them jetpacks now (you've already heard about flying desks ...)! To remember in time that "the best is the enemy of the good!" angry
  13. 0
    11 August 2021 11: 05
    I don't really know how it can be used for military purposes.
  14. +5
    11 August 2021 12: 44
    The jetpack is a purely fashion item.

    The knapsack creates an illusion in the inexperienced viewer that he is a single whole with a person,
    unlike a platform (for example, a type of motorcycle) when it is striking that this is a separate device.
    Although the satchel will not be more comfortable, lighter or safer.
  15. 0
    11 August 2021 16: 29
    In my opinion, as a combat unit such a "jetpacker" has zero utility. A 12,7 caliber machine gun will multiply it to zero with ease. It is absolutely impossible to book such a flyer from bullets of this caliber.
    Bet on stealth? It also whistles as a turbine and glows in the infrared range.
    Bet on speed? From the point of view of aerodynamics, a human carcass is not the best choice, it is extremely problematic to accelerate it to a speed that creates problems for the simplest air defense systems.
    Arming such a platform will be extremely problematic, the soldier's hands are busy with the steering system. And super-maneuverability of such a design is not possible in principle, in my opinion.

    Rescuers are mentioned in the article ... But how? Hands are busy, feet are busy. The carrying capacity is limited. Throwing off your medication bag? Isn't a light helicopter better?
    1. +1
      11 August 2021 17: 37
      A 12,7 caliber machine gun will multiply it to zero with ease. It is absolutely impossible to book such a flyer from bullets of this caliber.
      Why a machine gun? It will be multiplied by "Makarov" or TT by zero. Yes, what is really there. At the moment of landing, a baseball bat or a butt in the face will be enough. Because, with such a concept, he will not be able to fight back - his hands are busy, and all attention is paid to the stability of the flight and the fastest landing due to the exhaustion of the fuel supply.
  16. 0
    11 August 2021 17: 05
    "The Jet Suit weighs 27 kg; the total engine power reaches 10500 hp. Acceleration up to 85-88 km / h is provided (in an experimental flight, accelerated to 136 km / h) and flight within 5-10 minutes."
    It seems to me that with such an engine power, a conventional helicopter will carry more than one ton for more than one hundred kilometers. It is somehow unprofitable so far.
    1. 0
      11 August 2021 18: 12
      Explicit typo in power
  17. 0
    11 August 2021 17: 06
    This crap makes a lot of noise and a hidden approach is not possible on it. And given that a fighter must constantly monitor the fuel level, there is no point in talking about any possible operations, one delay and he will simply drown
  18. 0
    11 August 2021 18: 10
    It is possible for latecomers to catch up at train stations.
  19. 0
    11 August 2021 20: 00
    Something in Ukraine is suspiciously silent on this topic. Although they have cards in their hands - even without a knapsack, they can jump more often and higher than their more eastern relatives.
    And if they still have a knapsack? Reactive as well? Or at least a rocket from the Grad? Yes, they will not be restrained, they will dop to the ISS for free!
  20. +3
    11 August 2021 20: 05
    When a miniature cold fusion reactor appears, like the one that Tony Stark soldered in a Taliban cave, then there will be flying marines, armored exoskeletons, and even laser pistols with acceptable characteristics. In the meantime, all this exists only as demonstrators of technology, but either very weakly, or very shortly and not far, or with thick cables going to massive energy sources. I recall the release of Yeralash about the miracle clock and the power source for them ...
  21. AB
    0
    11 August 2021 21: 02
    Yeah, such a NATO eagle is flying to our ship. Here our boatswain comes out on deck with the crew, each holding a simple pump-action gun, with buckshot. And they begin to shoot these eagles like a raven. There is no return fire and cannot be. Their hands are busy, and if they could shoot, then the recoil would not be canceled. The result is obvious ...
    1. 0
      18 October 2021 01: 48
      Urgently equip all the crews of warships with pump-action shotguns!
      The main thing is to punish them not to clean them with a brick!
    2. 0
      18 October 2021 01: 53
      I wonder how the recoil from a firearm held in the hands in flight will differ from the recoil on the ground?
      Are you really hinting that shooters in jetpacks will be blown away like the little ones in "Dunno on the Moon, who decided to shoot being under the influence of artificial weightlessness from" moon stones "?)
  22. +1
    11 August 2021 21: 10
    The experiments are interesting. But so far there are no powerful, but very compact energy sources and truly reliable micro-motors - these are just experiments, nothing more.
    I am personally interested not in military applications (in my opinion, for such tasks it is much more reasonable for the military to use robots than "soldier beetles"), but civilian use. For example, in rescue operations at sea, in case of fires, in traffic jams. Now the helicopter has to hover over the point of evacuation, lower the cable, on which the rescuer descends and picks up the victims "on a carbine" or into a basket. But this is a very risky operation - the cable can catch on the structure of a ship or building in distress. And this is in a storm (somewhere in the Welded Atlantic or the Pacific Ocean) or in clouds of smoke and strong convective currents from a fire, dangerously close to neighboring buildings (or even worse, in combination - a fire on an offshore drilling platform in a strong wind).
    And if there was such a knapsack, then its pilot would not be shackled by a cable. The helicopter / ship keeps a safe distance from the dangerous object. A lifeguard in a knapsack starts from it. Flies up to the rescued from the safest side. Picks them up and delivers them directly to the helicopter or to its basket.
  23. 0
    11 August 2021 22: 02
    Recently watched the 1965 James Bond film "Fireball". There, this very Bond flutters at the beginning of the film with a similar knapsack. But most of all, our GAZ 22 station wagon is touched in the parking lot of the elite sanatorium "Shrublens", where Bond was healing his wavs received from his fellow worker! They know how to make beautiful fairy tales!
  24. +1
    12 August 2021 00: 33
    Quote: Xlor
    Such a weapon should be made on the basis of anti-gravity phenomena, but, alas, science is still very, very far from this. You can only read about this only in science fiction novels ...

    Well, you swung! Antigravity! This is the tech of a civilization level 3! There already no flying backpacks will be needed because humanity will (if it passes through all the great filters) exist in a completely different form, perhaps there will be a collective consciousness like the Borg civilization (Star Trek "First Contact") A kind of unimatrix Zero. And we are considering technologies of level 0, respectively, the improvement of this technology is possible in the period from 20 to 30 years. Remember the phones of 30 years ago and everything will become clear to you))
  25. 0
    12 August 2021 01: 51
    There are many scenarios for using a jetpack in the army in the navy and border troops. For example, an inspection team on an intruder ship. Or almost instantly climb to the roof of a building during city battles
  26. Lew
    0
    12 August 2021 11: 19
    while it is difficult to imagine any advantage in this version of this knapsack ...
  27. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.