The French showed the schedule for the "destruction" of Russian T-72B3 tanks with a CAESAR self-propelled howitzer

The French company Nexter Systems, a developer and manufacturer of CAESAR self-propelled howitzers, has shown its vision of the use of barreled artillery in modern wars. The video was posted on the company's official YouTube channel at the beginning of this summer.

The video shows the development of the situation in one of the likely military conflicts without defining the warring parties, which are simply indicated in different colors: their own - "green", the enemy - "red". Artillery comes from the enemy, Tanks and infantry. In the course of the video, the reconnaissance of the "green" determines the coordinates of the "red", transmits the target designation of the CAESAR self-propelled guns, which, accordingly, successfully eliminate the targets.

The video description says that the goal was to show the work of robotic systems at all stages. Also, most likely, the video showed the defeat of targets by the new 155-mm KATANA artillery guided projectile, which was tested in December last year using the CAESAR self-propelled guns.

It is noteworthy that the target in the video was shown Russian T-72B3 tanks. In the format of computer graphics, the French destroy two such tanks at once with the help of one self-propelled gun.

This is not the first time that Western animation companies have used Russian technology as targets to advertise the success of their weapons. In various videos, the S-400 air defense systems, Pantsir-S air defense missile systems, various boats and ships of the Russian Navy, aircraft, tanks and other armored vehicles have already been targets. The S-400 is especially "hit", apparently in the West these systems cause the greatest trepidation against the background of irritation.

Comments

[Murmur 55]

Well, who is going to talk about "cartoons" now? And the French are "cool" how can you not remember the phrase - "And that these won us too."

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: Murmur 55

Well, who will now talk about "cartoons"? And the French are" cool "

Well, back in 1993 at the IDEX-93 exhibition in Abu Dhabi "Msta-S" live demonstrated overwhelming superiority: when firing at a distance of 15 km, forty Krasnopol shells hit 38 targets. All those present were impressed by both the accuracy and rate of fire, and how, when hit by the tanks, the torn off towers flew off in different directions.

[AnpeL]

Well, they swelled with a blank in the direction of Russian technology - well done, damn it. And if then, throughout this whole rag-tag (and control, and combat group (groups), and gunners, and others), it is not by chance that he arrives in response from the MLRS? Apparently this is in the second episode - not for the mass audience.

[Shurik70]

I watched this cartoon. I didn't understand anything about the shooting.
A shell was fired. Then the shell suddenly split. Then he split up again.
At the end, there is something the size of a capsule, with wings.
A video of these primers hitting is shown. Two broads - and the tanks continue to stand intact.
Here the command and control of the troops is beautifully shown. The hologram rig had been stolen from the Jedi Council.

[Eug]

In the USSR, there were aviation cassettes with similar submunitions. The simplest IR guidance was used.

[Olegi1]

Second series - 18+ ...

[credo]

Quote: Murmur 55

Well, who is going to talk about "cartoons" now? And the French are "cool" how can you not remember the phrase - "And that these won us too."

Another confirmation of who France is for Russia.
Well, do not show the French as a target a merkava, a leopard or something good abrams.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Murmur 55

And the French are "cool"

"Here, in a warlike passion, Voivode Palmerston, strikes Russia on the map with his index finger!"(with)

[Murmur 55]

And mind you, they call us the enemy almost openly, in all commercials they destroy our equipment, this is normal for them, as soon as Ragozin announced about the Sarmatians and the coast, Russia was immediately accused of escalation and aggression.

[Terran ghost]

in all commercials they destroy our equipment, this is normal for them

Well, in general, the nationality of the "potential enemy" in these very commercials is not indicated in any way. Not to mention such a moment that the destruction of MILITARY equipment is shown in the course of a hypothetical military conflict. Moreover, it is not even clear with which enemy the conflict is - Soviet T-72 tanks in various modifications are in service with a couple of dozen countries, even not counting the countries of the former USSR.

[Murmur 55]

And how to explain that in all the latest exercises near OUR borders, Russia is called the enemy. And in the commercials they say it is not necessary that the equipment is ours ?! Sorry for the confusion.

[isv000]

In the video, the French use one self-propelled gun to destroy two Russian tanks at once.

I remembered a fairy tale - a brave little tailor is called. In the First World War, if not for the Russian Expeditionary Force, the French would have raked in full. You don't even have to say anything about the Second, but here with one shell ... two Russian tanks! D "Artanyan is ashamed in his coffin ...

[Barberry25]

it remains to allow the enemy's UAVs to fly over our positions and enemy reconnaissance behind a fence on a 4-meter shed to stand unnoticed ... in general, an attempt to give birth to at least something, at least somehow ... and our hands are not mastered in pictures, but at the range

[Terran ghost]

In the First World War, if not for the Russian Expeditionary Force, the French would have raked in full.

This, to put it mildly, is not true. The entire Corps numbered only 45 non-commissioned officers and lower ranks and 000 officers. In the same Battle of Verdun, February 750 - December 21, 18, there were groupings of troops from the French and German sides numbering more than a million troops. Actually, in the First World War, it was France and Great Britain that made the main contribution to the defeat of the German Empire.
PS: In the European theater of military operations of World War II, it was already the opposite - the Soviet Union bore the main contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany and the main burden of the war.

[Alex777]

Quote: Terran Ghost

Actually, in the First World War, it was France and Great Britain that made the main contribution to the defeat of the German Empire.

Especially for you.
Read who, when, whom and how won. Air Force by the way ...

From the beginning of August, Germany launched a large-scale offensive against Belgium and France, hoping to occupy Paris as soon as possible and guided by the so-called "Schlieffen plan", developed 10 years before the start of the war.
The advance of the German troops was swift and successful. On August 16, the well-fortified Belgian fortress of Liege fell, and on August 20 the Germans took Brussels.
The French troops, supported by the British Expeditionary Force, could not hold back the well-oiled German machine and suffered one defeat after another. As a result of the August battles of the Ardennes, Charleroi and Mons, the French suffered huge losses and continued to retreat, while the Germans were inexorably advancing towards Paris.
The French command, on the brink of despair, turned to the Russian Empire with a request to launch a large-scale offensive in the east as soon as possible. This would make it possible to draw off part of the German formations from the western front and prevent the complete defeat of France in the first months of the war.

https://www.bbc.com/russian/russia/2014/08/140826_ww1_samsonov_army_defeat
This aid to the "allies" cost Russia, in the end, the loss of a significant part of the professional army, which they did not manage to properly deploy and reinforce with the mobilized ...

[Petrik66]

The expeditionary force is one thing, the offensive of Rennekampf and Samsonov is quite another. But the fact that the Germans began to remove units from the Western Front for transfer to Prussia is a fact.
“The transfer of two corps and a cavalry division (120 thousand bayonets and sabers) from the Western Front to East Prussia seriously weakened the German army before the Battle of the Marne, which contributed to the victory of the French in this battle. Marshal Foch concluded:
If France was not wiped off the face of Europe, then we owe it to Russia first of all, since the Russian army with its active intervention diverted some of the forces and thereby allowed us to win on the Marne.
Strategic redeployment made a huge difference
The tactical success of Germany in East Prussia, due to the transfer of troops from the Western Front, turned into a strategic defeat in connection with the failure of the operation against France. Germany was forced to wage a protracted war on two fronts, which she had no chance of winning
Wikipedia to help us.

[Alex777]

Quote: Petrik66

The expeditionary force is one thing, the offensive of Rennekampf and Samsonov is quite another.

You read what exactly I answered:

Actually, in the First World War, it was France and Great Britain that made the main contribution to the defeat of the German Empire.

Nicholas II simply saved France.

[alch3mist]

In the First World War, if not for the Russian Expeditionary Force, the French would have raked in full.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This, to put it mildly, is not true. The entire Corps numbered only 45 non-commissioned officers and lower ranks and 000 officers.

Of course, we, such connoisseurs of numbers, have not heard about Osovets. 50 children poisoned with chlorine put 2000 healthy sausages to flight.
"Power is in the truth!". And you continue to add statistics.

[OgnennyiKotik]

Quote: isv000

and here with one shell ... two Russian tanks! D "Artanyan is ashamed in his coffin.

Classic: I have not read it, but I condemn it.
The projectile releases 2 submunitions, which hit the tanks.

[isv000]

Thanks I'll know.

[Momento]

But is there any sense now in the SAU at all? kamikaze drone is cheaper and target designation can be changed faster. the sau projectile is probably more powerful and flies faster?

[Eug]

Is in France near Reims
This city is Ma (u) rmelon ...
do not remember ... Rodion Malinovsky fought in the Expeditionary Force in France in 1 MV .. Normandy-Neman is also not remembered ..

[lopuhan2006]

I propose to finish in the video with Zircon by getting into the Caesar plant)

[forcecom]

Or the video about the Sarmatians ends with a nuclear explosion in the center of an unnamed city similar to Paris.
In general, even in the 20350s, I watched the video of the Northern PKB about the frigate XNUMX of the project, so he was there alone in one wicket soaking the AUG of an unnamed state, with the silhouette of an aircraft carrier strongly reminiscent of "Nimitz". In commercials, in general, "ours" always wet "not ours"

[Wolf]

This is not the first time that Western animation companies have used Russian technology as targets to advertise the success of their weapons. In various videos, the S-400 air defense systems, Pantsir-S air defense missile systems, various boats and ships of the Russian Navy, aircraft, tanks and other armored vehicles have already been targets. The S-400 is especially "got", apparently the West does not like these systems.

On the contrary, it shows that Russian technology is "popular" in the West.
Or in fear the eyes are huge.
The video is interesting, the quality of the animation is good, but the conditions on the battlefield are such as Mali François wanted, UAVs fly freely, etc. ...

[Per se.]

Quote: Wolf

On the contrary, it shows that the Russian technique is "popular" in the West.

Interestingly, in the early 90s, the French offered self-propelled guns for India, putting a turret with a 155-mm gun from their AUF1 self-propelled gun on the T-72 chassis. The resulting SPG based on the T-72 turned out to be successful, and had a good chance of finding other buyers (the Indians refused any SPGs then), but that was the end of the history of this vehicle.

[APASUS]

CAESAR fired poorly, because one shot can cover a couple of T-72B3 regiments, or even an entire division.
Not enough fantasy?

[aszzz888]

In the format of computer graphics, the French destroy two such tanks at once with the help of one self-propelled gun.

Why not a column at once? Hollywood nervously smokes on the sidelines.

[Uncle lee]

Quote: aszzz888

Why not a column at once?

As John Silver said: "Beautifully drawn"!

[Momento]

By the way, there was such a project for the amerikosov. but with the end of the cold war, they closed it - it was expensive. and they didn’t seem to do it.

[Vioi]

The cartoon inspired the fighters

[Pessimist22]

France has become the same as the henpecked Macron.

[Sands Careers General]

Like little children. We drew a computer video, and they think that it will be so there in the event of a real battle)))

Well, well)) Let them console themselves)))

[uav80]

Quote: Murmur 55

And the French are "cool" how can you not remember the phrase - "And that these also won us."

"When it comes to my understanding, war always means defeat." - Jacques Chirac.
“When it comes to France, he is right!” - Rush Limbow.

[Marachuh]

Beautiful pictures. The valiant French shoot the deaf-blind-mute enemy with impunity. What if the enemy spotted the training of the technique with a rangefinder / radar and turned on the RB? And at the same time the artillery and aviation of the "Reds" worked on the emitted source? How is it in French - embarrassment Monsieur D, Artagnan? Zhomopel Ivan!

[Murmur 55]

Here the Poles have recently conducted exercises, so that they didn’t make STEEP EPIC videos based on their results.

[lopuhan2006]

Quote: Forcecom

Or the video about the Sarmatians ends with a nuclear explosion in the center of an unnamed city similar to Paris.
In general, even in the 20350s, I watched the video of the Northern PKB about the frigate XNUMX of the project, so he was there alone in one wicket soaking the AUG of an unnamed state, with the silhouette of an aircraft carrier strongly reminiscent of "Nimitz". In commercials, in general, "ours" always wet "not ours"

And that's right!) And who, then, to wet it?)

[Ros 56]

How long did the French surrender to Hitler there? And you probably won in cartoons?

[Ross xnumx]

The French showed the schedule for the "destruction" of Russian T-72B3 tanks with a CAESAR self-propelled howitzer

They would show the schedule of the "six-week war" - the military operation of the Axis countries in Western Europe from May to June 1940, which led to the defeat of the French, Belgian and Dutch armed forces ... It was real, and we will appreciate it.

[rocket757]

This is not the first time that Western animation companies have used

However, this is a very conditional success ... in real life everything can go very wrong !!! What many real events have shown, in contrast to Hollywood crafts.
Those. We don't throw our hats, but we don't need to rush the hairs in different places either.

[ont65]

And what? - The French do not use active defense systems themselves, or are their ACS intended for third world countries in which they have not heard anything about it?

[Doliva63]

Quote: Barberry25

it remains to allow the enemy's UAVs to fly over our positions and enemy reconnaissance behind a fence on a 4-meter shed to stand unnoticed ... in general, an attempt to give birth to at least something, at least somehow ... and our hands are not mastered in pictures, but at the range

So the use of HANDS (ROC) was mastered by us already in the early 80s, something "partners" lagged behind

[Sergey Kulikov_3]

And if the T-72 was a rubber product and served to identify firing points, then everything changes, you just need to supplement the cartoon :)

[ALEXANDER GAZEEV]

You can draw any picture, but we have already seen the "exploits" of the frogs against the Wehrmacht.

[Romanenko]

As a child, I also liked to draw wrecked tanks and planes, there was nothing to shoot cartoons with, but it was also good, and most importantly, knock down as much as you want until the pencils run out ...
No loss on my part

[Evil 55]

Yes, dial for simulation any byaki in Gairope: Leclercov, Abrashek, Challengers, Lepards there ... and bang all this with an eaten loaf against the backdrop of the Strasbourg Cathedral ... Huy know, remember and count ..

[Viktor Sergeev]

When you create crap that nobody needs, all that remains is graphics. Have you learned from the Ukrainians?

[Bogalex]

The video clearly shows not the "Katana", but the serial 155-mm projectile "BONUS" - a joint development of the Swedish "Bofors" and all the same "Nexter".
Unfortunately, we do not have such people.

[AllXVahhaB]

the greatest thrill on the background of irritation

[Baron pardus]

The French are not to be blamed. This is a promotional video for the company. Should they exhibit Abrams or Leopards as "Opponent"? Naturally, if "express concern", then the French government will refer to "freedom of speech." Maybe it's time to stop calling openly hostile states (SPECIALLY SPECIALLY SPEAKING WHAT) - NATO MEMBERS "Partners".
Maybe it is better to diplomatically call them "Interlocutors" or "Geopolitical and ideological competitors". Well, do the corresponding cartoons too. Soyuzmultfilm also needs work. Make a cartoon about the new BOPS, which the Abrams, Leopards and Leclercs punch into both sides. They flew into the right one and flew into the left one, well, so that, like in WAR THUNDER, it was shown as on x-ray what is happening with the crew and the mechanisms of the tank. Well, or is there a Cartoon about what the new depth charges for RBU-6000 are doing with the latest American or British torpedo (interception) and what they are doing with submarines (there are explosions around the boat, breaks in the hull, panic among the crew, a close plan of bulging out of horror persons). An IDEOLOGICAL WAR is going on against Russia, if you don't understand there. And you wipe yourself off and keep quiet. Naturally, your "partners" see what is happening and become even more impudent. You perfectly understand that if you made NEXTER or there Lockheed of this type of cartoons in the 70s-80s, then the answer would be IMMEDIATELY. Political or economic. Your country is disrespected because YOUR COUNTRY ALLOWS SUCH ATTITUDE TO YOURSELF.

[da Vinci]

This is if someone allows the UAV to fly at an altitude of 100 m, and if there is no counter-battery firing system, and if there is no enemy UAV, and if ...

[BAI]

reconnaissance of the "green" determines the coordinates of the "red", transmits the target designation of the CAESAR ACS, which, accordingly, successfully eliminate the targets.

And why are the French so sure that they will have time to shoot first? Will they be able to transfer any information somewhere?