PAK DA bomber under construction

79

Currently, the Russian aircraft industry is developing a strategic bomber-missile carrier "Perspective aviation long-range aviation complex "(PAK DA). The construction of the first prototype is already reported, and in the near future it will be tested. However, there are no complete and detailed official reports on this score yet.

Work in progress


At the beginning of 2019, the Russian media reported the approval of the draft design of the future PAK DA. Then it became known that the customer and the contractors signed all the documents necessary for the production of samples. What kind of production was stipulated by these papers was not specified.



At the end of May 2020, TASS published interesting data obtained from two sources in the defense industry. One of them said that the United Aircraft Corporation had completed the development of working design documentation. Also, the supply of materials for the construction of an experimental vehicle has begun. The manufacture of airframe elements is entrusted to one of the factories that are part of the UAC.

The second source then clarified that the assembly of the cockpit for the future experimental PAK DA had already begun. The construction process, according to him, should be completed during 2021. At the same time, such information has not received official confirmation.

In December last year, an unnamed TASS source revealed new construction details. For flight and static tests, two or three airframes are assembled in parallel. The production of tooling and first parts was launched. All gliders will be built several months apart.

The source confirmed the information that appeared earlier, according to which the cabins for the PAK DA are manufactured by the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant. He must complete several of these kits, some of which are intended for ground testing. At the same time, the final assembly of the aircraft was entrusted to the Kazan aircraft plant.


Latest at the moment news the construction of the experimental PAK DA was received a few days ago. On August 2, TASS announced the continuation of work on the "demonstration copy". It will be ready by 2023. Other details were not disclosed.

Engine issue


At the very beginning of last year, the Interfax agency announced the imminent start of testing and testing the engine for the PAK DA. In the near future, the United Engine Corporation was to prepare a flying laboratory on the basis of the Il-76 transport and manufacture an experimental engine of a new type. At the end of 2020, the laboratory was going to begin ground tests, which will take less than two years.

At the end of the year, in December, other information was received. The management of the UEC-Kuznetsov company spoke about the work of an experimental engine of a new type with the working designation “RF Product”. By that time, individual components and assemblies were tested. In addition, the assembly of the first prototype product began. Bench tests are scheduled for 2021.

The timing of the completion of work on the RF engine is still unknown. Recent news about the readiness of one of the PAK DAs by 2023 suggests that by this time the engine for it will also be ready.

Technologies and components


Recently, there has also been regular news about the development and production of individual units and components of the future aircraft. Also, the development of various technologies continues and the necessary tests are carried out.

In March, RIA Novosti received information from an industry source about tests for radar signature. On a special stand, mock-ups of the aircraft itself and individual units were checked. Even at the stage of research work, using computer modeling, ultra-low EPR indicators were determined. Bench tests have confirmed these characteristics. As reported, the detection range of PAK DA by fighter aircraft has been reduced by several orders of magnitude.

In early June, TASS disclosed information about the development of a new airborne defense complex (BKO) specifically for the PAK DA. It is argued that such a BKO will protect the aircraft from any enemy weapons - systems with radar and optical guidance. At the same time, special emphasis is placed on electronic suppression systems, but again the details were not reported.

PAK DA bomber under construction

Also, a TASS source clarified that all PAK DA weapons will be placed only inside the fuselage. Among other things, the aircraft will receive long-range missiles. As a result, the aircraft will be able to strike from outside the enemy's air defense zones without the risk of early detection and interception.

During the MAKS-2021 air show, the Zvezda enterprise announced some data on the development of an ejection seat for the PAK DA. This project is being implemented in accordance with plans and is now preparing for testing. In the coming years, the finished seat will be put on the plane. The pilot's rescue system will be equipped with a new enlarged plane parachute. With its help, a safe descent will be ensured at all heights. At the time of the announcement of the information "Zvezda" was engaged in the manufacture of such a parachute.

At the production stage


Thus, the PAK DA program is gradually moving forward and yielding the desired results. All or almost all of the required research and development work has been completed, and most of the design has been completed. More than a year ago, the production of individual components and assemblies began, and in addition, a full-fledged construction of several prototypes was prepared and launched. At the same time, some components of the future aircraft are still at the stage of testing and development.

According to the latest unofficial reports, the first PAK DA will be ready by 2023.The start date of flight tests remains unknown, but from this news it follows that the first flight will take place no later than 2025. Accordingly, it becomes possible to predict the possible completion of the tests, the launch of the series and the start supplies of equipment to the troops.

It should be noted that the processes observed now do not fully correspond to the news of the distant past. So, in the middle of the tenth years, it was repeatedly stated that the first flight of the PAK DA could take place already in 2020-21. Unfortunately, the program did not meet such a deadline, and the first flight will take place later. However, it is not known whether 2021 was in the official work schedule as the date of the first flight.

At the same time, it is already clear that such assessments were overly optimistic. As of mid-2021, the industry continues testing and testing various units, incl. engines, radio electronic means and rescue systems. It will take several years to complete these measures, but without them it will not be possible to build a full-fledged PAK DA flight aircraft and conduct its tests.

Responsible period


One way or another, various organizations from the UAC and UEC continue to work and receive new results of various kinds. Some of them are made public through official statements or through unnamed press sources. In general, the emerging picture allows us to draw the first conclusions and assess the situation in a positive way.

Despite the lack of official information and details, it is clear that now in stories of the PAK DA program, there is a particularly crucial period. The successful outcome of the program - and, at the same time, the distant future of Russian long-range aviation depends on the current work both on individual components and on the aircraft as a whole.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    10 August 2021 04: 14
    Again fables
    1. -3
      10 August 2021 08: 17
      Neither wobbly nor roll ...
      1. +14
        10 August 2021 09: 16
        People are busy around the clock! There is a hard search - who will develop equipment and technological solutions for free! It is desirable, let him pay extra from his own. The problem is that collectives, and even individual nuggets from the USSR, are practically over. What exists now in the place of our aviation industry does not want to work for free. In addition, the possibilities of these stubs ... Did you draw a 3D model? The potential has been exhausted, even slightly exceeded.
      2. +1
        10 August 2021 18: 54
        remind in what process you need to rush or, nevertheless, guess without a prompt?
        1. -1
          10 August 2021 19: 20
          Quote: Fil743
          remind in what process you need to rush or, nevertheless, guess without a prompt?

          So you are a living example of initially unhurried actions.
    2. -2
      11 August 2021 19: 16
      I saw it myself, everything is in progress.
  2. +17
    10 August 2021 04: 19
    The article is about nothing at all. Uncle No. 1 said one thing, and Uncle No. 2 said something completely different. Show the assembly of the glider on the slipways, we will discuss. And so - some pictures of artists. I also drew airplanes as a child
    1. +15
      10 August 2021 04: 42
      Quote: AC130 Ganship
      The article is about nothing at all.

      A very interesting article about how:
      So, in the middle of the tenths it has been repeatedly stated that the first flight of the PAK DA can pass already in 2020-21. Unfortunately, the program did not meet such a deadline, and the first flight will take place later.

      over six years, the funds allocated for the development were spent, how by the end of the term they were not enough and why it is necessary to add some money so that until 2025 the light (with the preservation of vision and the use of "Blueberry-Forte") could cherish the hope for the "appearance" of several samples of the cabin and some other design details.
      ==========
      Gentlemen! I understand that you want to amaze the world with "analogs" that do not yet exist. But, revenge is a dish that is served cold.
      As for a discovery or a breakthrough, real, actual accomplishments are held in high esteem, not ideas and fantasies.
      1. +3
        10 August 2021 07: 02
        And I liked photo # 1 - the pilot spread his wings and flew! laughing
        1. +3
          10 August 2021 08: 25
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          And I liked photo # 1 - the pilot spread his wings and flew!

          Pilots will not be needed soon !!!))))) laughing
      2. -1
        10 August 2021 07: 05
        Here, a little more ...
        1. +2
          10 August 2021 08: 15
          Quote: Civil
          Here, a little more ...

          And we will move on to a more ambitious and ambitious project.
          1. +5
            10 August 2021 09: 56
            Quote: Stroporez
            we will move on to a more ambitious and large-scale project

            belay Shall we build communism?
            1. +4
              10 August 2021 11: 02
              Quote: Serg65
              Shall we build communism?

              Someday we will definitely be.
              1. +1
                10 August 2021 11: 13
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Someday we will definitely be.

                recourse Well, again it is "someday"! Last time it was not built in 70 years, but now for how long?
                1. +7
                  10 August 2021 11: 20
                  Quote: Serg65
                  Well, again it is "someday"! Last time it was not built in 70 years, but now for how long?

                  Let me remind you that the transition from feudalism to capitalism in Europe took more than 500 years and was accompanied by almost continuous wars, if you forgot your school history, of course. But you are an educated person and you studied school history diligently, aren't you? So tell yourself, is 70 years a lot or a little?
                  1. 0
                    10 August 2021 11: 34
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    Let me remind you

                    Oh, I beg you!
                    Quote: aleksejkabanets
                    Is 70 years a lot or a little?

                    And how long do you need to build communism?
                    And yes, for 40 years without a war period there were all the prerequisites to knock on the gates of communism, but somehow it did not work out. Do you think that you will succeed?
            2. +6
              11 August 2021 05: 57
              Shall we build communism?

              Now we are moving rapidly towards feudalism.
              1. -5
                11 August 2021 08: 52
                Quote: ramzay21
                Now we are moving rapidly towards feudalism.

                Where do you see feudalism in modern Russia?
                1. 0
                  11 August 2021 09: 49
                  The fact that modern Russia (bRSFSR) is the Moscow presidency.
                  1. 0
                    11 August 2021 10: 24
                    Quote: sevryuk
                    modern Russia (bRSFSR) is the Moscow presidency.

                    what So since 1547 Russia has been the Moscow Kingdom, the Moscow General Secretariat, and now the Moscow Presidency .... or do you want the Shadrinsk Presidency?
                    Quote: sevryuk
                    We are in it.

                    Those. in what do you see feudalism, you do not know .. because you are in it? You have an interesting life situation! And whose slave will you be?
              2. -2
                11 August 2021 09: 48
                We are in it.
      3. +5
        10 August 2021 08: 20
        Quote: ROSS 42
        As for the opening or breakout

        For jerks and breaks, we have a special person.
      4. +2
        10 August 2021 14: 23
        Quote: ROSS 42
        As for a discovery or a breakthrough, real, actual accomplishments are held in high esteem, not ideas and fantasies.
        The real was previously secret, no one knew what was in the bins, now everyone knows, even about what is just thinking. As they say,
        The best gift is intention. (Latin proverb)
        .
      5. -2
        12 August 2021 00: 19
        it just doesn't seem to be a priority project.
        Well, you can't do everything at once. the su-57 is obviously more needed.
        1. 0
          28 October 2021 13: 30
          Well, how can I say ... Tu95 will be slowly withdrawn, Tu22M3 too ...
    2. -3
      10 August 2021 08: 19
      Quote: AC130 Ganship
      Show the assembly of the glider on the slipways, we will discuss.

      The enemy also wants to take part in the discussion. laughing The main thing is clear from the article. The design has been completed and construction has begun. This is already good ...
      1. +3
        10 August 2021 09: 57
        Quote: Hagen
        The design has been completed and construction has begun. This is already good ...

        Judging by the cons, this is bad ... recourse
        1. -2
          10 August 2021 10: 34
          Quote: Serg65
          Judging by the cons, this is bad ...

          Obviously, there are people here who want everything new from Russia to die at the stage of design.
          1. +5
            10 August 2021 11: 03
            Quote: Hagen
            Obviously, there are people here who want everything new from Russia to die at the stage of design.

            No, there are just people who want to see not drawings of airplanes, but real deeds.
            1. -3
              10 August 2021 11: 24
              Those who are supposed to see. What side are you here?
            2. -1
              10 August 2021 12: 09
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              they want to see not drawings of airplanes, but real deeds.

              Obviously, not everyone understands that drawings, in other words, the project of a new high-tech product is no less important, if not more, than its actual embodiment. Ideas, especially those expressed in a technologically sophisticated form, are more difficult to generate than to build on a finished, even complex product. Most people are just a little tight with ideas. wink
    3. -1
      10 August 2021 11: 21
      Maybe more keys to the apartment?)
    4. +2
      10 August 2021 19: 49
      Equally "nothing" will be your story about your family without a selection of home videos with the participation of your wife belay (well, you, so be it). Your drawings "about this" will not fail. laughing "Realism" is so "realism" everywhere. am
  3. +11
    10 August 2021 05: 58
    Ugh! There are no other emotions. Yesterday about the orbital station, today PAK YES, is it not a shame to write praises to become about anything? am
    1. 0
      10 August 2021 09: 23
      Yes, so far they don't even know how many gliders are being built for testing, what details can be said here.
      1. -3
        10 August 2021 21: 00
        In general, a demonstrator is being built, a full-size model for testing, and the engine for the PAK DA is already being tested at the Il 76 air laboratory.
    2. +2
      12 August 2021 19: 06
      So the elections are coming soon. It is necessary to maintain the intensity and more urapatriotism. Science seems to have been launched by the elections ...
  4. -4
    10 August 2021 06: 09
    Developers and factories, instead of concentrating all their efforts on preparing WHILE, are simultaneously trying to do 2 projects at once, a new perspective and an old one from the last century.
    Even taking into account that part of the avionics will be unified, there was still not enough strength. So, nothing surprising.
    Although no, the position of the Big Bosses, who signed up for this adventure, is surprising.
    Apparently they hung such noodles, that sschaz, that we are ogogo ...
    1. -1
      10 August 2021 17: 36
      lol, i.e. if the Kazan plant stops assembling the Tu-160M, will the PAK DA fly in a year?
      1. -1
        10 August 2021 18: 34
        Quote: Barberry25
        If the Kazan plant stops assembling the Tu-160M, will the PAK DA fly in a year?

        So the fact of the matter is that no one collects anything.
        First, the technologies have been lost, and the plant spends a lot of time, effort and money to restore them and prepare production facilities.
        Secondly, the new aircraft will differ from the old one, and the design bureau, together with its subcontractors, are engaged in redesigning from scratch.
        If the design bureau and its subcontractors did not spend their efforts, money and time on designing an aircraft from the last century, but concentrated all resources on a new project, then the result would be different.
        It is the same with the plant, if he were not engaged in preparing the production of an old aircraft, he could have started preparing for the production of a new one.
        1. 0
          10 August 2021 19: 23
          yeah, here recently the generals acted on the same principle ... and then it turned out that they had satisfied the need for stripes ... this is the story with Kurganets and BMP-3, and also with Boomerang and BTR-90 ... but it's okay there, in the end, they decided to buy the BTR-82 .. So sorry, but no "they will briskly deal with one project and they will tear everyone" will not work, because the development in the most optimal case will be reduced by 1 year, but from the testing and debugging stage there is nowhere get away, as well as the introduction of the troops ... that is. even according to the plan, we are talking about the 27th year, and at this time the troops will be able to provide combat readiness with what? obsolete Tu-160s stuffed with the 80s? and how to provide competence to the plant? And so by the time PAK DA is mastered, the VKS will receive at least 10 vehicles, and according to the plan, they should receive up to 50 vehicles.
          1. 0
            11 August 2021 03: 20
            Quote: Barberry25
            at this time, the troops will be able to provide combat readiness with what? obsolete Tu-160s stuffed with the 80s? and how to provide competence to the plant?

            The plant and those who make the stuffing, and so were in business, they are modernizing combat aircraft.
            And the analogy with the armored personnel carrier is not entirely appropriate, the old armored personnel carriers were not removed from the conveyor and the conveyor itself was not disassembled, but with the TU160 the plant and the design bureau had to rebuild the production and redesign the aircraft. That is, not to continue, but to start over. Is the difference really not clear? Almost at the same time, 2 aircraft are being designed and prepared for production.
            1. +2
              11 August 2021 08: 32
              modernization does not go far ... the same Tu-160, about which you say that it is an old plane and we do not need only 16 boards ... and the VKS expects to get another 15 boards in 50 years ... the difference is 50 sets of equipment for About the old armored personnel carrier it was a question of combat effectiveness, and in this case, the plant will collapse until the production of PAK DA is launched by 2030, because they will have 2 options: either pay people a salary just like that, or stretch the modernization of 16 sides at incredible terms , which will still lead to the degradation of the plant due to the lack of support for the production of new aircraft. And yes ... since you think that the army is wrong here, okay, how will the terms change if now the Ministry of Defense refuses to purchase new Tu-160s, closes all unnecessary workshop at the plant and will throw the design bureau completely for the development of PAK YES .. just not "well, it's faster" but actual numbers ..
              1. -1
                11 August 2021 09: 05
                Quote: Barberry25
                How the terms will change if the Ministry of Defense refuses now

                I don’t know exactly, I don’t have access. But I think that they will not change very much.
                Because the bulk of the work on the design and preparation of the production of the old aircraft has already been carried out.
                Although, maybe if they refuse today, they will fly tomorrow ... I have no access, sorry.
                1. +2
                  11 August 2021 11: 43
                  laughing the fact of the matter is that this will not significantly affect the timing, but the development process itself is very lengthy, as well as testing .. And if it drags on? Or fails? Let's say that it will not be the best option .. then what? An army without missile carriers And so, it's more expensive, but the army turns out to be a backup option that will serve, and taking into account that the PAK DA and Tu-160M ​​complement each other, then the efficiency will be higher .. it is better to have 50 new bombers than not to have them..
                  1. -1
                    11 August 2021 11: 50
                    Quote: Barberry25
                    this will not significantly affect the timing,

                    Already told.
                    Quote: Barberry25
                    the development process itself is very lengthy, as well as testing ... and if it takes too long

                    Well, it just dragged on.
                    Moreover, it was delayed both with PAKDA and Tu160m.
                    Once again, I draw your attention to the fact that there is no Tu160m production.
                    Exactly the same design is going on and exactly the same preparation for production in parallel with PAKDA.
                    Those. two absolutely equal projects.
                    1. +2
                      11 August 2021 12: 02
                      laughing how much? this is sophistry ... "now, if they all did it all at once, they would do it faster" .. by how much? and the possibility of building a Tu-160M ​​airframe ... At the moment, I know that there is no production, but I already wrote that there is a gap of 10-15 years and the question is ... how can we provide combat effectiveness? but there will be nothing ... the same story there was an MBT, when the T-14 only this year will deliver the first batch of 20 tanks, and conversations have been going on for 11 years already ... As a result, we have about 72 t-3b3 / b90m instead of purchasing T-400A. The same story with BMP, while everyone was waiting for Kurganets, there was a gap of several years, which in fact cost 500-3 BMP-2, which could have been delivered to the troops over the years ... So in the end now even the old BMP-82 has to be modernized ... protection of the BTR-90A in order to reach the level of the BTR-160? Or thinking about installing an ATGM on it? ... If we cannot immediately To start producing the most super-duper, then due to many years of downtime in the supply of equipment, we need to take the most advanced, which has already been debugged and can be produced .. Therefore, in the videoconferencing, apparently someone was smart enough not to close the topic with the Tu-XNUMXM
                      1. 0
                        11 August 2021 12: 26
                        Quote: Barberry25
                        Because of many years of downtime in the supply of equipment, you need to take the most advanced, which has already been debugged and can be produced.

                        Which circle have we gone already?
                        You just wrote it yourself - there is no "debugged".
                        But with armored personnel carriers and tanks, there is a streamlined production, so the example is not correct.
                        It's just that the Chief was told that there was a production and the plant would start collecting carcasses again and again tomorrow, but in fact everything turned out to be much sadder.
                      2. 0
                        11 August 2021 13: 53
                        incorrect? seriously?! let's take and for 15 years we WILL NOT supply new bombers to the troops ... this is how your proposal sounds in fact .. just 5 points, the main prize at the championship "How to substitute the country"
                      3. 0
                        11 August 2021 15: 42
                        Quote: Barberry25
                        this is how your proposal actually sounds

                        No, not so.
                        My proposal sounds like this - let's make one instead of two projects, then it will fly not in 15 years, but in 5 years.
                      4. +1
                        11 August 2021 15: 48
                        and if it doesn’t fly? I remind you that even if it does, it will take 5 to 7 years for testing and adoption ... and the question arises ... 10 years, during which the army could get 10 to 20 bombers go by it turns out that someone who did not even lie next to the design of aircraft will be pleased with the topvar ... and yes ... just that sabotage is your proposal ... apparently the experience of imposing in pants on tanks, on BMPs, on armored personnel carriers, and on ships the topvar does not teach anything either ... they want to jump on a rake
      2. -4
        10 August 2021 20: 00
        With what drunken joy they are building Tu-160s at Kazan? They wanted to modernize them. Yes, it seems they refused. What special talked about it from the factory
        1. 0
          11 August 2021 08: 33
          with the one that you are not in the subject ... go and read the news
  5. +10
    10 August 2021 06: 26
    Cool article - either rain, or snow, or it will be, or not. And so everything is correct. wassat
  6. +3
    10 August 2021 07: 12
    The publication is very timely. Elections are coming soon.
    1. -2
      10 August 2021 21: 02
      And what kind of makara this publication and all the others influence the elections? It is not necessary to mix everything up in a heap and attach it to the elections.
  7. -5
    10 August 2021 08: 07
    Excellent!
    Only the fact that Russia is carrying out such a complex, new and necessary project is already encouraging.
    And those who whine that the queen is long, slow, I will only say one thing ..
    On the couch, of course, you know better)))
  8. 0
    10 August 2021 08: 44
    PAK DA bomber under construction
    So all the same, is it a platform for delivering shock weapons to the right point, at the right time, or something else?
    1. -5
      10 August 2021 09: 27
      It is also 2-3 kilograms of delicious dietary meat. Those. - there is enough money for all the beneficiaries.
  9. -4
    10 August 2021 08: 52
    By 2030, as planned, it will be launched into series, but for now, so that the Tu-160m and Tu-22M plants do not get bored. Over the years of small observations, we add 8-10 years to the promises of our aircraft ship, spacecraft and builders)
    1. 0
      10 August 2021 21: 04
      Most likely, all Tu 22M3 M3M field 20030th will begin to be removed from service.
  10. +1
    10 August 2021 09: 21
    The most realistic timeframe for the first PAK DA flight under current conditions in the country is 2030, serial production in 2040, not earlier.
    1. 0
      10 August 2021 17: 37
      write right away 2045 .. so that with a guarantee ..
  11. +4
    10 August 2021 09: 25
    If they do it, we'll see. And now there is only talk about the taste of dishes at the dinner of Catherine the Great ...
  12. -1
    10 August 2021 12: 24
    Slightly reminiscent of the English "Volcano"
  13. +1
    10 August 2021 13: 13
    There is actually nothing to discuss so far, at least they will roll out an exhibition model and then ............... and now they are discussing general rules, requirements, materials and it is not clear whether the plane has a look
    1. +1
      10 August 2021 21: 07
      Already the engine for it is being tested and the appearance, like the materials, has long been determined by R&D at the last stage.
  14. +1
    10 August 2021 21: 13
    Ryabov has to go to guess by hand - he is very talkative, the gypsies will be terrified ...
  15. -1
    10 August 2021 22: 54
    Quote: Vadim237
    Most likely, all Tu 22M3 M3M field 20030th will begin to be removed from service.

    Judging by the situation, the Tu-22 is waiting for more
    one modernization and until 2040 they will boldly stretch 30 pieces.
    1. 0
      11 August 2021 19: 37
      No, the glider has an expiration date until 2040th.
  16. 0
    10 August 2021 23: 38
    If this is so, then I think that by the age of 30, the PAK DA will already begin to enter combat units
  17. -1
    11 August 2021 00: 55
    Quote: Ilya_Nsk
    Slightly reminiscent of the English "Volcano"

    These mediocre renders are as relevant to the project as the outbursts on Saturn are to the vole population of mice.
  18. 0
    11 August 2021 11: 42
    It is just right that the Aviation Design Bureau does not try to skip or shorten any stages of the development and testing of the PAK DA. The cost of a catastrophe of even one flying specimen is too high. Both in money and the possible closure of the project
  19. 0
    11 August 2021 14: 31
    If I remember correctly, the US counterpart has no rudders, ailerons, and generally other planes other than the wing.
    1. 0
      11 August 2021 19: 40
      This will also not have vertical tail - a clean flying wing.
  20. +1
    11 August 2021 15: 49
    the detection range of PAK DA by fighter aircraft has been reduced by several orders of magnitude.

    Well, nonsense then why write that. Several orders of magnitude is at least 100 times. At visual detection range chtol?
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. -1
    16 August 2021 10: 19
    It's ridiculous to discuss in the media the process of introducing a link of the nuclear triad ... We learned about the 75th (checkmate) exactly 2 weeks before the release, and then without any specifics. Forget leaks. If they do exist, then strictly according to the plan and with the knowledge of the competent authorities of the relevant department. At the moment, we can say with full confidence that the order for the implementation of the project has been given. With a high degree of probability, it can be assumed that it is being fulfilled. Everything else is from the evil one. I think until the prototype flies - there is nothing special to discuss using sofa methods.
  23. -1
    4 November 2021 12: 32
    Let's take a look. The fact that we started assembling the first prototype is very good. The timing is unrealistic, readiness for 2023, at the beginning of the last century, during this time, battleships were built.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"