Landing craft LAW development program. First options and prospects

24

A variant of the appearance of the LAW ship. Graphics US Navy

In the United States, work continues on a promising program for the development of a "light landing ship" Light Amphibious Warship (LAW). Its goal is to create a landing craft of reduced size and displacement, capable of transporting people and equipment, as well as independently disembark them. It is assumed that such ships will be able to make the amphibious fleet more efficient and flexible, but at the same time will not require excessive spending.

Features and limitations


Currently, the US Navy has seven Wasp-class amphibious assault ships, two America-class UDCs and 11 San Antonio-class dock ships. They are designed to transport personnel and various equipment, including helicopters. The ships are designed for over-the-horizon disembarkation, and the delivery of troops to the shore is carried out by air or using LCAC hovercraft. The number of the latter in the Navy reaches 74 units.



For all its advantages, such an amphibious fleet has long been criticized. The main reason for claims is the high cost. Thus, a ship of the "San Antonio" type costs more than 2 billion dollars. The price of the UDC "America" ​​is approaching 4 billion. Operation of the existing fleet also costs significant amounts.


Austal USA Cntyl at Sea Air Space 2021. In the foreground is a stand with a LAW model ship. Photo by Austal USA

The over-the-horizon principle of landing also raises certain doubts. It requires the involvement of additional landing craft, and also negatively affects the rate of landing. As an alternative, ships with a bow or stern ramp were proposed for direct landing of troops on the shore - as in the so-called. tank landing ships of the past.

New program


In April 2020, the US Navy officially announced the launch of a new program for the development of a promising amphibious assault ship. The need to create LAW was justified by changing the nature of threats at sea and the specifics of future amphibious operations. The existing UDC and air cushion boats do not fully meet the requirements of the future, and therefore it is necessary to develop a ship of a new type.

According to the preliminary assignment of the Navy, a LAW-class ship should have a length of at least 200 feet (60 m), develop a speed of at least 14 knots, operate in waves up to 5 points and show a cruising range of 3500 nautical miles. The crew will include no more than 40 people.


Austal LAW mock up close-up. Photo Twitter.com/CavasShips

On board the new ship, at least 8 thousand square feet (743 sq. M) of area should be provided for the landing of troops - from 75 people. or various techniques. It is necessary to provide a crane for handling loads. The landing is required to be carried out directly ashore using the bow or stern ramp.

The first reports of LAW were accompanied by graphics with a possible appearance of the future ship. The pictures showed a ship with a small superstructure in the bow. Almost all the volumes of the case were given under tank deck with aft ramp. A helipad was provided directly above the tank deck.

The first project


Several large shipbuilding companies are participating in the competitive part of the LAW program, incl. Austal USA. In early August, at the Sea Air Space 2021 exhibition, she first showed her version of the future landing ship, in the form of graphics and a scale model.

The project from Austal USA proposes the construction of an amphibious assault ship with a length of approx. 120 m with a displacement of less than 5 thousand tons. The body of standard contours with a flat bottom in the bow is used. The bow sections of the hull are given over to the tank deck. The superstructure is located in the stern; there are also power plant units. The design performance exceeds the requirements of the Navy.


Side view. The characteristic bottom profile is noticeable. Photo Twitter.com/CavasShips

The landing craft from Austal USA gets a 10500 sq ft (975 sq ft) tank deck. Provides placement of equipment or containers in four longitudinal rows; the outlet in the bow is double-row. For disembarkation, it is proposed to use a folding bow ramp, hidden under the lifting bow of the ship. Due to this, the customer's requirements were met in terms of disembarkation of equipment and people on the unequipped coast, incl. with a bias.

The ship must receive all the mandatory set of electronic weapons for navigation, work in the control circuits of the fleet, etc. Means of self-defense are provided. In particular, small caliber artillery mounts are located on the base and behind the superstructure. This provides self-defense when operating near the coast. Perhaps, in the future, the composition of weapons will be revised in order to increase firepower and provide full support for the landing.

Plans for the future


Austal USA is not the only participant in the new program. Earlier it was reported that other American companies are also showing interest in the LAW project. However, so far they have not shown their designs. Probably, this will happen in the very near future, otherwise they will not be able to claim the victory and the contract.


The bridge superstructure and power systems are concentrated in the stern to make room for the payload. Photo Twitter.com/CavasShips

According to current plans, the development of projects on a competitive basis will continue until 2022-23. By this time, the fleet will have to study the proposals of the program participants, choose the most successful one and, taking into account its peculiarities, adjust its plans. In 2023, it is planned to announce the winner of the program and sign the first construction contract. The deadline for the delivery of the head LAW has not yet been determined.

Depending on the actual needs of the fleet and the appearance of the ships, the Pentagon plans to order a series of 24 to 35 units. The desired cost of the lead ship is determined at $ 156 million. As serial construction progresses, the price of new hulls should be reduced to $ 130 million.

A forward-looking concept


The advanced landing craft LAW is part of a larger concept for the development of the Marine Corps and the Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO). It provides for the deployment of more small units of the Marine Corps and a significant increase in its mobility. Such principles will be used in the Pacific to counter China's growing naval forces.

Within the EABO, promising LAWs will be responsible for the rapid transfer of personnel, equipment and other cargo between the islands, incl. with the landing of troops in a combat situation. It is believed that this will provide high mobility and maneuverability of the ILC, as well as prevent the enemy from organizing an effective defense.


USS Tripoli (LHA-7) America-class on sea trials, July 15, 2019 Photo by US Navy

The use of UDC within the framework of the EABO concept is not excluded, however, such combat units will not be able to provide the required mobility of troops, and will also face increased risks. Nevertheless, the combined use of UDC and LAW for solving differing problems within the same operation will provide good results.

Economic and other benefits are also provided. So, for the price of one America-type UDC, 25 smaller LAWs can be built, which will be able to carry at least no less troops. At the same time, protection from such a flotilla will become a more difficult task, and the defeat of even several ships will not lead to a disruption of the entire operation.

Old new idea


In the distant past, the US Navy restructured its amphibious forces using large UDCs and hovercraft. They refused from tank landing ships capable of independently landing forces and means ashore. A few decades later, they return to this concept - but with the involvement of new technologies and ideas.

The reasons for this decision are quite simple and are associated with a change in the current situation and the emergence of new challenges. The existing amphibious fleet does not allow to respond to them correctly, and therefore the US Navy and ILC need new mass ships, partly similar to those that have long been removed from service. The real potential of such a concept will become clear in a few years, when the fate of the LAW program is finally clear. In the meantime, the promising program is in its early stages, and the choice of the winner and the start of construction are expected only in a couple of years.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 August 2021 18: 13
    UDC America is finally transformed into light aircraft carriers. The landing will be transferred to smaller ships, such as these LAWs. For this, the ILC is "facilitated". They have abandoned tanks, more emphasis is placed on missile weapons and UAVs. The modern and future development of technology dictates such changes.
    1. +8
      10 August 2021 18: 39
      Quote: OgnennyiKotik
      The modern and future development of technology dictates such changes.

      Quite right. A promising assault force will not require a landing l / s or equipment. The foothold for the safe unloading of forces and equipment can be cleared using UAVs, long-range MLRS and missiles.
      Is it not clear that the same landing ships are in danger of destruction (if not on the way) at the time of unloading (landing). Actually, the theory that generals are always preparing for the last war is right to 100. Sometimes fresh ideas and thoughts contribute to victories with fewer, but more skill.
      1. +3
        10 August 2021 19: 02
        Quote: ROSS 42
        The foothold for the safe unloading of forces and equipment can be cleared using UAVs, long-range MLRS and missiles.

        They are already testing.
      2. +2
        10 August 2021 19: 11
        Exactly

        In fact, this is a return to the times of 2 MB - LST disembarkation with all that it implies. Tanks can be returned to the Marines.
      3. +3
        10 August 2021 20: 06
        Quite right. A promising assault force will not require a landing l / s or equipment. The foothold for the safe unloading of forces and equipment can be cleared using UAVs, long-range MLRS and missiles.
        Is it not clear that the same landing ships are in danger of destruction (if not on the way) at the time of unloading (landing). Actually, the theory that generals are always preparing for the last war is right to 100. Sometimes fresh ideas and thoughts contribute to victories with fewer, but more skill.

        Yes sir. Everyone has forgotten where the concept of UDC came from.
        And she took over from Vietnam, when they needed a landing ship, which, during the landing, would stand out of the reach of the Vietnamese SHORE ARTILLERY ..

        In modern conditions, this is meaningless, because the ballistic missile system "Bal" reaches for 120 km, and the "Bastion" for all 600. We will have to swim across the entire Black Sea from the Bosphorus to the Crimea on amphibians. wink
        But there is still aviation ...

        Now, in order to land, it is necessary to totally suppress the coastal defenses to great depths. And if it works out, then you can land on ordinary dry cargo ships.
        1. +1
          11 August 2021 10: 27
          partly agree.
          these are projects in fact KFOR of the times of the USSR, in order to remove expensive UDCs in the coastal zone from the impact of anti-ship missiles
          veiled recognition by the Americans of the principles of the Soviet and now Russian school of shipbuilding, rocketry
        2. -2
          11 August 2021 21: 46
          After the appearance of the MLRS, there was no sense in such landings! Landings in the style of Omaha Beach were covered with a copper basin .. Standing 40 km away MLRS of the "Grad" type, even in the number of one piece, puts an end to this venture .. The same picture with tank wedges and other delights of the Second World War .. All the little kids. ...
          rs: Still, it would have come to the aviancephiles that "they don't clean guns with a brick" ..
    2. +6
      10 August 2021 20: 11
      In general, not a replacement, but an addition. Most likely, there will be three squadrons of 9 units. Each such squadron is capable of transporting a regiment of marines, akin to the Soviet large landing craft. From which the United States abandoned thirty years ago.
      The need for just such (light) ships is also caused by the disbandment of ALL tank battalions of the Marine Corps and the reduction in the number of artillery units.
      "New is well forgotten old".
    3. +1
      10 August 2021 20: 12
      Well, in appearance and concept (taking into account the landing ramp and sliding gates), this co-operable is very similar to our Project 1171 Tapir large landing craft (Project 1174 Rhinoceros was larger and had a different line-up, but the American does not look like 775) ...

      And there was talk that the BDK were conceptually outdated, that they should be written off and cut as unnecessary ... No.
      But in the "Syrian Express" how they helped, proved to be necessary and correct! And more than once they will be useful to the Motherland ...

      And now the Americans have decided to do something similar. And nobody says that the idea is bad. So we must appreciate the development of Soviet engineers and shipbuilders. Breakthrough ideas and technologies do not lie on the road, but are also a foundation for the future.
      1. +4
        10 August 2021 20: 28
        Quote: RealPilot
        Well, in appearance and concept (taking into account the landing ramp and sliding gates), this co-operable is very similar to our large landing craft

        These ships came from the US Landing Ship, Tank (tank landing ships) of the Second World War. In this case, back to basics.



    4. +1
      10 August 2021 20: 19
      I am amazed at the simultaneous decommissioning of tanks and the development of ships with increased tank landing capabilities. If the tonnage of equipment has decreased, why was it necessary to build these ships with an emphasis on heavy equipment?
      1. +3
        10 August 2021 21: 36
        Quote: Kostya Lavinyukov
        removal from service of tanks and development of ships with increased tank landing capabilities. If the tonnage of equipment has decreased, why was it necessary to build these ships with an emphasis on heavy equipment?

        Not tanks alone ...
        AAV7 / hypothetical EFV, MLRS, self-propelled guns, etc.
        And it is difficult to carry 75-ton tanks, and they will begin to bury themselves strongly in the Asian alluvial sand ...
  2. -1
    10 August 2021 18: 34
    This is what will be the cost of operating these ships and the cost of landing an inexpensive or two platoons on some unknown islands.
    1. +7
      10 August 2021 18: 59
      Quote: Stas1973
      nedoroty or two platoons to some unknown islands.

      They have not decided what exactly will happen, if the Australian version or an analogue is a very decent load. A couple of mouths are minimum.
      The project from Austal USA proposes the construction of an amphibious assault ship with a length of approx. 120 m with a displacement of less than 5 thousand tons.

      For example, the large landing craft of the 775 project, smaller in size (112 meters and 4400 tons), had a landing capacity:

      10 medium tanks and 340 people
      12 units of armored vehicles and 340 people.
      3 medium tanks, 3 self-propelled guns 2S9 "Nona-S", 5 MT-LB, 4 trucks and 313 people.
  3. -2
    10 August 2021 20: 02
    Well, yes, drag it with you ... where are they going to land through the puddle? From aviks? Brad ... Remember the teachings of the Tiger and Lime Bay at least
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. +4
      10 August 2021 20: 13
      It is even in a different concept with an open cargo deck from which equipment goes along the gangway.
      1. 0
        27 September 2021 10: 27
        laughing 5 points .. a wet beach, and they will slide into it on MRAPS .. apparently they did not check what would happen to the wheeled equipment)
  5. 0
    10 August 2021 20: 34
    Quote: OgnennyiKotik
    Quote: RealPilot
    Well, in appearance and concept (taking into account the landing ramp and sliding gates), this co-operable is very similar to our large landing craft

    These ships came from the US Landing Ship, Tank (tank landing ships) of the Second World War. In this case, back to basics.


    [/thumb] https://topwar.ru/uploads/posts/2021-08/1628616743_f6d675dc-6d96-438f-a13b-af227fe04f04.jpeg [/thumb]

    Thanks for the information! I did not know that.
  6. -3
    10 August 2021 22: 19
    Well, taking into account these warriors, you can level everything and everyone and return to the concept that is being developed now. In an open battle, Faberge is not right for them. It will go against baboons, but not with serious players.
  7. +3
    10 August 2021 23: 08
    Earlier it was reported that other American companies are also showing interest in the LAW project. However, so far they have not shown their designs.

    Come on. Sea Transport Solutions alone has already shown several options.


    Again, not an article, but a transfusion from empty to empty.
  8. +3
    11 August 2021 09: 11
    Such ships need a fire support ship armed with reconnaissance and strike drones, MLRS. Turkey wants to adapt the universal amphibious assault ship TCG Anadolu for Bayraktar TB2 drones.
    https://warspot.ru/19197-turetskiy-avianosets-bespilotniki-vmesto-f-35
  9. 0
    11 August 2021 13: 43
    Well yes. In principle they returned to their WW2 system but with modern technology.
    Cheap and cheerful.
  10. 0
    27 September 2021 06: 49
    I read and remember BDK 1174 project Rhino. Full displacement - 14060 t. Cruising range at 18 knots. with normal (maximum) fuel reserve - 4000 (7500) miles. Autonomy for provisions - 15 days when transporting 500 paratroopers and 30 days when transporting 250. It's a pity that they could not save, they were very necessary boxes
  11. 0
    8 October 2021 23: 27
    Very similar to "Mitrofan Moskalenko"

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"