Explosion on starboard side: in the United States showed the final shock tests of the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford

The US military reports that the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) has passed through the final (last) of the planned shipboard impact tests - FSST. This is the third test, which was intended to determine the ability of the US Navy aircraft carrier to respond to the effects of high waves, as well as the shock wave resulting from an explosion about 150 meters from the side.

The reports say that the third phase of testing was carried out in the Atlantic Ocean, near the base in Jacksonville, Florida.

The release, provided by the US military, says that shipboard shock tests confirm the carrier's shock resistance and its ability to withstand explosions at sea in a simulation of a real combat situation using real ammunition.

In total, the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford withstood three explosions of 18 tons, carried out at various distances from the ship.

From the release:

We made sure that the ship is ready for use in harsh combat conditions, including rough seas. Our team has obtained extensive data on the impact strength of the aircraft carrier's hull. All systems when exposed to the shock wave worked as designed.

Now the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford will undergo an additional check for another six months, which will assess possible damage. The combat deployment of the aircraft carrier in the oceans is planned for 2022.

US Navy Rear Admiral James Downey, who oversees the aircraft carrier programs, said that during the explosion tests, "the team acted well and did not make critical mistakes."

The explosion was carried out on the starboard side of the aircraft carrier. The explosion itself and the degree of its impact on the ship are shown in the US Navy footage:

Comments

[tralflot1832]

1 CT on the deck, or "island" and mustache. A purely psychological action!

[Proton]

The missilemen missed ...

[soul]

Quote: Proton

Missilemen missed

Can't hit the third time

[engineer74]

The UN Security Council urgently needs to collect: "Irreparable damage to the environment - billions of crabs (or someone else) have suffered! Immediately ban US NAVY from entering the ocean, oblige all ships to be cut within a year !!!"
Ecology uber ales !!!

[Uncle lee]

Quote: ROSS 42

I can’t believe something

As in a joke: We also thought 18 tons ... And she banged kaaak!

[Flooding]

US Navy Rear Admiral James Downey, who oversees the aircraft carrier programs, said that during the explosion tests, "the team acted well and did not make critical mistakes."

I can't believe the crew was aboard the ship at the time of the explosion.
I wonder which insurance company insures property and employees?

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

150 meters away, it exploded ... they sat down to their heels in vests at the exit to the deck and prayed to their black master ... they felt sorry for the whites ...

[tralflot1832]

All these booms at the side, these are tests for the impact of a nuclear warhead on an aircraft carrier. The question is only at what distance from the explosion, 150 meters, simulate an explosion of nuclear warheads, 1 km, 2 km or 3 km. Well, they do not believe that you can put a warhead on the deck .Let not believe. Zircon will show its !!!

[Albert1988]

Quote: tralflot1832

Well, they do not believe that you can put a warhead in the deck. Let them not believe. Zircon will show its own!

Why don't they believe? Just the same they really believe and I know - they will get on the deck - "Izya everything"

[Comrade I]

Zircon will show its own. If there is something to guide him ...

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

And there will be something to bring down the gunner for 2000 km !? This trough, like Zamwolt, is well grazed from space ... already 2000 before its territory for sure.

[volodimer]

I don’t know what they think about Zircon, but they should clearly think about Dongfeng-26.
For all the ambiguity: https://topwar.ru/173854-kitaj-provodit-ispytanija-raket-maloj-i-srednej-dalnosti-dunfjen.html It will not be possible to simply dismiss the fact of its existence.
After all, if he "misses a little", the result will still be painful. The aircraft carrier may not sink, but the rest of the AUG ships ...

[Scharnhorst]

In any case, to the amerikosy on this occasion "respect and respect"! Our command is unlikely to decide on such tests of the frigate of project 22350. And ... it seemed to me alone that the explosion was carried out in shallow water? ...

[Voltsky]

for the militarists, that "we are all defeated"; sinking of this trough -> 5k 200/300 => war :)
It is not a problem to sink, the problem is to withstand the onslaught of an embittered strange, with the world's most powerful industrial potential, and besides, without enemies around the perimeter.

[Marachuh]

You probably confused America with China?

[Voltsky]

I only worked in America, never in China.

And how many offices are there in China that designs engines ?!
How many offices in China are there that are engaged in microelectronics at the forefront?
How many offices are there in China that produces advanced weapons?

I just saw it with my own eyes, but from China only huavei and other xiaomi heard

[MMX]

And how many offices are there in China that designs engines ?!

Enough. China is one of the countries that designs and manufactures the entire range of engine building.

How many offices in China are there that are engaged in microelectronics at the forefront?

Everything is active here too. It is difficult to call them leaders, but among the actively growing ones.

How many offices are there in China that produces advanced weapons?

China is one of the five largest arms exporters. That is, he is all right with that.

I just saw it with my own eyes, but from China only huavei and other xiaomi heard

And what about industrial production directly? How much is in the PRC and how much is in the United States? Could you tell?
How many factories in the United States produce tanks?

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

Component parts for F-35 - China ... Canada ... Turkey ... So Amaryk will be able to build one plane !?

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

China has its own hypersound on the stream ... but what about it in America ... out of 13 launches - 13 self-detonation ... why are you stupefied ...

[Voltsky]

Quote: Dimon Dimonov_2

Component parts for F-35 - China ... Canada ... Turkey ... So Amaryk will be able to build one plane !?

All technologies are in sga, they are divided to a minimum, similar to how China sprinkles grains of technology in the Russian Federation and vice versa.

I'm talking about who now has the greatest potential - and this is the SGA, and not China, which is only in the future.

[Wahmister 1970]

They're risky guys! ”So the engineer was counted correctly and the naval officers were convinced that they were right.

[Marachuh]

All this is certainly beautiful and interesting, but has nothing to do with real combat. Who will throw multi-ton bombs, we do not seem to live in the 40s of the last century. And here is how the aircraft carrier behaves when the carrier-based aircraft fueled and ammunition is damaged by the debris of anti-ship missiles, how it withstands torpedo hits, it's interesting!

[Albert1988]

Quote: Marachuh

And here is how the aircraft carrier behaves when the carrier-based aircraft fueled and ammunition is damaged by the debris of anti-ship missiles, how it withstands torpedo hits, it's interesting!

It seems that such tests were carried out on old decommissioned aircraft carriers - with a direct hit into the ship and the ignition of aviation fuel, the chances of its survival are hardly distinguishable from zero ...

[Avior]

very easy to behave - turn on the universal deck irrigation system

After the known incidents of fires,

[loki565]

very easy to behave - turn on the universal deck irrigation system

extinguishing fuel with water is not an idea. If there is a hole in the deck, the fire will spread through the water and increase the area of ​​the fire, flow into the hole and the interior.

[Avior]

This is to localize the source of fire
To extinguish directly the hearth will be either stationary fire nozzles or cars
Something like this

[Marachuh]

I have already presented the takeoff of an airplane with decks filled with debris and burnt airplanes flooded with water. And at the same time, remind me of what kind of offensive weapons the aircraft carrier carries besides the aircraft itself?

[Albert1988]

After the anti-ship missile enters the aviation fuel tank, no system will save it.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

After the anti-ship missile enters the aviation fuel tank, no system will save it.

Not a single missile will reach the aviation fuel tanks ...
Look at the diagrams of aircraft carriers, from the lineup ...

[Albert1988]

Quote: SovAr238A

Not a single missile will reach the aviation fuel tanks ...
Look at the diagrams of aircraft carriers, from the lineup ...

Ahem, an old "granite" aircraft carrier is able to pierce through and through, then what can we expect from the same zircon and dagger?

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: SovAr238A

Not a single missile will reach the aviation fuel tanks ...
Look at the diagrams of aircraft carriers, from the lineup ...

Ahem, an old "granite" aircraft carrier is able to pierce through and through, then what can we expect from the same zircon and dagger?

I wrote it in Russian for a reason, see the diagram and layout ...

And yes, is there real evidence of the super-super-penetrating ability of Granites?
Well, at least there is an old Soviet cinema like Granite that breaks through, for example, a cruiser, at least by 10 kilotons?

[Albert1988]

Quote: SovAr238A

And yes, is there real evidence of the super-super-penetrating ability of Granites?
Well, at least there is an old Soviet cinema like Granite that breaks through, for example, a cruiser, at least by 10 kilotons?

Read on granite - you will find a lot of information. By the way. - there is not a single photo of how a modern aircraft carrier withstood the hit of a modern anti-ship missile ...
Py.Sy .: So there are no questions about zircon and dagger?

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: SovAr238A

And yes, is there real evidence of the super-super-penetrating ability of Granites?
Well, at least there is an old Soviet cinema like Granite that breaks through, for example, a cruiser, at least by 10 kilotons?

Read on granite - you will find a lot of information. By the way. - there is not a single photo of how a modern aircraft carrier withstood the hit of a modern anti-ship missile ...
Py.Sy .: So there are no questions about zircon and dagger?

I read a lot about granite,
About Zircon and Dagger - I also have no food ...
For for normal guidance to a moving target, you need to have time for both detecting the target of the seeker of the rocket, capturing it, and correcting the flight.
Need time.
You need the speed at which the seeker will work and so that the radio-transparent cover of the seeker will allow you to work ...
And all this is already at ultra-low altitudes, where air resistance is many times higher than by 20 km ...

Accordingly, the rocket, that dagger, that Zircon, will reduce the speed to the level of M2 ...
Like the same Granite, he reduced the speed in front of the target to M1,5.

but what you still do not understand, where are the tanks for aviation fuel from aircraft carriers.
Any missile hit can cause severe damage to an aircraft carrier ...
But getting into tanks with fuel - 0,01% ...

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: SovAr238A

Any missile hit can cause severe damage to an aircraft carrier ...
But getting into tanks with fuel - 0,01% ...

For fun, read the story of how, in 1973, the Belknap cruiser roamed a wave while refueling on the move and ripped through the cheekbone of an aircraft carrier. And it must be the same as successfully got - it was in the fuel tank. Burning kerosene poured onto the deck ...
Burned sick hour 4. In the literal sense of the word, it became smooth-deck - aluminum superstructures and armament on the deck burned to the ground.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Captain Pushkin

Quote: SovAr238A

Any missile hit can cause severe damage to an aircraft carrier ...
But getting into tanks with fuel - 0,01% ...

For fun, read the story of how, in 1973, the Belknap cruiser roamed a wave while refueling on the move and ripped through the cheekbone of an aircraft carrier. And it must be the same as successfully got - it was in the fuel tank. Burning kerosene poured onto the deck ...
Burned sick hour 4. In the literal sense of the word, it became smooth-deck - aluminum superstructures and armament on the deck burned to the ground.

Well, let's correct your "ignorance" ...
First of all.
1975 year.
Second, Belknap crashed his superstructure at the end of the angled landing deck (almost in the middle) of the aircraft carrier. On a collision course, at a speed of 12 knots.
And he didn’t tear any cheekbones with any fuel tanks.
He pierced the side under the flight deck with his superstructure and damaged three gas stations.
Two were pressurized and ready to refuel the planes in preparation for takeoff.
In turn, the entire superstructure of Belknap was cut off like a knife.
In the exhaust pipes as well.
On top of Belknap, 5 tons of fuel poured out, just poured onto these very exhaust pipes.
That is why Belknap caught fire ...
5 tons of fuel poured onto Belknap and several hundred gallons inside the aircraft carrier's premises damaged by Belknap.

Both were burning.
Only now Belknap burned the same as Sheffield later.
And at the aircraft carrier, only the damaged rooms were burned out, in which tools and spare parts for aircraft were stored.

The aircraft carrier did not stop working on receiving aircraft, because the situation itself arose initially due to a change in the course of the aircraft carrier, for flight operations, landing and takeoff.
And there were trainees on the Belknap bridge who did not follow the commander's order and did not owe him a change of course.

[Captain Pushkin]

Many years have passed since then. He wrote from memory, confused the date for a couple of years, the circumstances of the collision - according to the publications of that time, i.e. 1975 of the year. I remember a photo of the cruiser after the fire.
But this is all secondary, and most importantly, that fire is an excellent illustration of the fact that there is so much fuel and explosive on an aircraft carrier that any hit can lead to serious consequences.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

By the way. - there is not a single photo of how a modern aircraft carrier withstood a hit by a modern anti-ship missile ...

Come on?
Read the documents how the Americans blew up their decommissioned America for a whole month ...
Arranging daily simulations of missile and torpedo attacks ...
Single and volley.
Both above the waterline and below the waterline.
Over a hundred explosions were made.
And after the last explosion, she was still afloat for more than a week ...

The aircraft carrier is an ultra-reliable device.
It was originally designed in such a way as to be as secure as possible structurally and in terms of the materials used and in layout ...

[Marachuh]

If you remove from T72: the crew, fuel, ammunition, then it can be hollowed out for a year and not ignited. But in a real battle, the picture is somewhat different. It's like a hint to you ...

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Marachuh

If you remove from T72: the crew, fuel, ammunition, then it can be hollowed out for a year and not ignited. But in a real battle, the picture is somewhat different. It's like a hint to you ...

Is the T-72 sinking?

And here to ignite?
If an aircraft carrier was sunk not only by imitation of missiles, but also by imitation of torpedo strikes, including salvo, but it still did not sink and did not sink ...

[Captain Pushkin]

In the Pacific, the Japanese drowned one of the American aircraft carriers with a single 227 kg bombs hit ...
If there were no fuel, aircraft and ammunition on it, there would never be a drowning ...

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Captain Pushkin

In the Pacific, the Japanese drowned one of the American aircraft carriers with a single 227 kg bombs hit ...
If there were no fuel, aircraft and ammunition on it, there would never be a drowning ...

Sorry, but I do not know of any cases of sinking of an American aircraft carrier during World War II from one 227kg bomb.
Can you give details?

Several torpedoes were used to sink escort aircraft carriers built on the basis of C3 transports.

But from one aerial bomb - I don't even remember the zhskortniki

Remind me what kind of ship you are talking about!

[Captain Pushkin]

The aircraft carrier Princeton was killed on October 25, 1944.
During the battle in Leyte Gulf, a 227 kg bomb pierced the flight deck and exploded on the hangar deck, where the fueled planes were, some with suspended torpedoes ...
The fire spread to the entire ship, detonated the artillery cellar, etc ...
A few hours later, the surviving personnel was removed, the aircraft carrier was finished off with torpedoes by the escort ships.
Source of knowledge: the book "Combat use of aircraft carriers" Voenizdat, 1973

[Reader 2013]

In such tests, the target is prepared, all cables are removed, everything that can burn, all compartments are welded, etc.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Citelle 2013

In such tests, the target is prepared, all cables are removed, everything that can burn, all compartments are welded, etc.

Don't ...
Do not distort.

What you write about is done only when training your strength.
As with the same Perry-class destroyer or many other target ships ..
When he was beaten by all and sundry. Trained on a cat.

The trials to destroy America were one of the stages in the development of the Bush-class aircraft carriers.
And it was not just drowned, but drowned in a controlled manner, studying absolutely everything that is happening and how it is happening.

[loki565]

Not a single missile will reach the aviation fuel tanks ...
Look at the diagrams of aircraft carriers, from the lineup ...

It depends on what kind, the same Granite can pierce through the aircraft carrier, if it reaches, of course)))

[SovAr238A]

Quote: loki565

Not a single missile will reach the aviation fuel tanks ...
Look at the diagrams of aircraft carriers, from the lineup ...

It depends on what kind, the same Granite can pierce through the aircraft carrier, if it reaches, of course)))

And if 10 aircraft carriers are delivered, then 10 will penetrate?
And all right through?
With a high-explosive-penetrating (semi-armor-piercing) warhead?

[loki565]

And if 10 aircraft carriers are delivered, then 10 will penetrate?
And all right through?
With a high-explosive-penetrating (semi-armor-piercing) warhead?

Well, not 10, but one for sure, there is such a concept, kinetic energy)))

[SovAr238A]

[quote = loki565] [quote] And if you deliver 10 aircraft carriers, will it hit 10?
And all right through?
With a high-explosive-penetrating (semi-armor-piercing) warhead? [/ Quote]
Well, not 10, but one for sure, there is such a concept, kinetic energy)))


Now compare the size of this PUK to a 100 kiloton aircraft carrier.
where the width of the flight deck is under 80 meters ...
And the hangar is about 65 ...

[loki565]

Now compare the size of this PUK to a 100 kiloton aircraft carrier.
where the width of the flight deck is under 80 meters ...
And the hangar is about 65 ...

As you can see, the main explosion took place after the through beating, since Granite is designed specifically for targets such as an aircraft carrier.
P.S. how can hangar width affect anti-missile resistance? It's like punching through an empty tanker)))

[SovAr238A]

Quote: loki565

Now compare the size of this PUK to a 100 kiloton aircraft carrier.
where the width of the flight deck is under 80 meters ...
And the hangar is about 65 ...

As you can see, the main explosion took place after the through beating, since Granite is designed specifically for targets such as an aircraft carrier.
P.S. how can hangar width affect anti-missile resistance? It's like punching through an empty tanker)))

Damn ...
Firstly, the hangar consists of several sections. and movable armored bulkheads are used.
Which localize the point of impact.
And they do not allow the energy of the explosion to go to other sections.

How many decks does an aircraft carrier such as Nimitz or Ford have?
There are 9 ...
Everything below the hangar deck is twice as wide as that of Peter the Great,
and it is there that everything important is located. it is there that the hull of the aircraft carrier is made with a large number of longitudinal and transverse armored bulkheads. And all other bulkheads are made splinterproof.
Cellars for the same aircraft weapons are scattered throughout the ship and there are 32 of them ...
They are all spaced around the hull of the aircraft carrier. so that their detonation could not lead to a chain detonation.
And yes. they are all very below the waterline.
And yes. armament feed elevators - two or even three-stage. That there would never be "open" access to the cellars.


Here is the result of the simultaneous detonation of 3 Mk-83 bombs in total about the same power as the warhead of Granite (500-600 kilograms). Here is such a hole in the flight room. armored deck.

Does this look like destroying an aircraft carrier?
And in total, 6 such bombs were thrown on the deck at that moment, and the tanker with almost 23 thousand liters of kerosene ...
Severe damage?
Yes, during the war, such damage was not considered at all.
The performance of the aircraft carrier is not reflected in any way.


Nikolsky believed that 25-30 Granites were needed to disable Nimitz ...

[loki565]

Firstly, the hangar consists of several sections. and movable armored bulkheads are used.

Once again, what is the thickness of these "armored" bulkheads, what caliber can withstand 7.62?)))

Does this look like destroying an aircraft carrier?

If such holes are across the runway, the aircraft carrier turns into a useless barge, repairs will take time. Damage to the catapult at sea cannot be repaired. There are also cases of fire, after which the helicopter carrier went on write-off)))

Nikolsky believed that 25-30 Granites were needed to disable Nimitz ...

uh, here it means, for a guaranteed breakthrough of the air defense of the AUG)))

[SovAr238A]

I have a question.
How do you think the catapult cannot be repaired?
Has Russia had the experience of using several dozen catapult aircraft carriers in battles?
Modular replacement with stock of components has been around for a long time.
The aircraft carrier has 4 catapults.
Where are the other three going?


The question is as follows.
Why do you think that the bulkheads will not work to extinguish the energy of the explosion of the warhead?
Will you decide which warhead is on Granite, and when it is planned to be detonated?
Otherwise, you have a supersonic scrap on the one hand, which supposedly goes to take off, and on the other hand, a penetrating high-explosive warhead of 600 kg ...

Have you seen how many missiles and torpedoes hit that would flood a tiny tank landing ship with a displacement 15 times less?
Exactly 25-30 missiles to completely disable ...

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

8 will fly right away ... at least 6 will definitely fly

[Avior]

The aircraft carrier on aircraft carrying ships is usually below the waterline, the anti-ship missile system is very difficult to get there.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Avior

The aircraft carrier on aircraft carrying ships is usually below the waterline, the anti-ship missile system is very difficult to get there.

Very much below the waterline.
After a lot of armored decks and bulkheads.

[loki565]

After a lot of armored decks and bulkheads.

Really armored? and how armored are they, what caliber can they withstand? Do you accidentally confuse modern aircraft carriers with aircraft carriers from the time of WW2?)))

[SovAr238A]

Quote: loki565

After a lot of armored decks and bulkheads.

Really armored? and how armored are they, what caliber can they withstand? Do you accidentally confuse modern aircraft carriers with aircraft carriers from the time of WW2?)))

I do not confuse.
At least several decks.
from 4 for sure.
At least on the last non-nuclear ones, like the same Kitty Hawk, there were just 4 units.
Anti-torpedo armor belts.

With the advent of nuclear power plants, the booking has only increased.
This is a fact.

[loki565]

The aircraft carrier on aircraft carrying ships is usually below the waterline, the anti-ship missile system is very difficult to get there.

Some modern anti-ship missiles are able to make a slide. In principle, even a small anti-ship missile capable of damaging the deck can permanently withdraw an aircraft carrier as a combat unit. If the catapult is damaged, then this is already a "factory overhaul".

[SovAr238A]

Quote: loki565

The aircraft carrier on aircraft carrying ships is usually below the waterline, the anti-ship missile system is very difficult to get there.

Some modern anti-ship missiles are able to make a slide. In principle, even a small anti-ship missile capable of damaging the deck can permanently withdraw an aircraft carrier as a combat unit. If the catapult is damaged, then this is already a "factory overhaul".

This hole is caused by the simultaneous detonation of 3 bombs, with a warhead mass comparable to 600 kg of warheads from Granite.
In a real battle, this hole will not even have any role.
The Americans fought with aircraft carriers many years ago.
They really fought.
Strangers drowned and lost theirs.

They drowned their decommissioned America for a whole month.
Month.
They ate the dog to ensure the safety of their aircraft carriers.
Well, you can't consider them, with such a baggage of knowledge and experience, to be considered fools.

And again it starts about one rocket.
As the mantra is repeated - one rocket, one rocket.

How many air regiments were there to destroy an aircraft carrier in Soviet times?
How many Anteyevs was needed for one aircraft carrier?

Well, we damaged one catapult!
And the rest?
The remaining three will say: "Oh, I don't want to work without a girlfriend!"
So what do you think?
Well, what are you really that ...

The decommissioned tank landing Ratsin was stuck with 15 anti-ship missiles.
And nothing.
And only torpedoes finished him off ...
8300 tons of gross displacement.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: SovAr238A

How many air regiments were there to destroy an aircraft carrier in Soviet times?
How many Anteyevs was needed for one aircraft carrier?

Two mrap, two Antheas and two more Seagulls. But this is for the guaranteed incapacitation of the AUG with a "wartime" escort.

[Avior]

The PKR makes a slide if the target is too low and the rocket can fly by
And so the slide is a convenient moment for the aircraft carrier's air defense

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Avior

After the known incidents of fires,

The most important thing that the Yankees implemented after Forrestal was training all team members in the basics of firefighting - what, what and how to extinguish. And then on the Forrestal, after the death of regular firefighters, the team was doing a freaky thing: on one side it threw foam on burning fuel, and on the other side it tried to fill the same fire with water, washing off the foam and accelerating the burning fuel.

By the way, is the deck irrigation system really a fire system, and not part of the RChBZ?

[Avior]

It is universal, I wrote it from the very beginning

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

The new Drill aerial bomb will also be extinguished with carbon dioxide !? 2-3 holes in the deck and only the vertical will take off ... the one that still did not have time to lift ... because everything that was on the deck will either blow off into the sea or will be badly damaged ... and it is not a fact that the elevators will work after small shake. Big grave for almost 5 thousand people.

[DeFalco]

I'm afraid that by the time the anti-ship missiles attack, it will no longer have a hangar full of refueled aircraft ... If it has at least a 15-minute warning about the attack.

[japan-k]

Yes, the video looks strange.
Why the aircraft carrier, after such an explosion, such a wave, did not even stagger an inch
Or HOLLYWOOD helped

[gregor6549]

A routine testing procedure for external shock resistance, as defined by the relevant requirements and testing procedures currently in force in the United States and its allies military standards (MIL-STD).
Similar standards are used for testing ships of the Russian Navy. So there seems to be no reason for banter. Although how without him? Banter is our everything

[agond]

And it would be interesting to conduct tests on the subject of how deeply a high-speed kinetic projectile penetrates into the hull of an aircraft carrier, like a tank BOPS made of depleted uranium.

[japan-k]

What does the banter have to do with, isn't there not a single example, the help of Hollywood specialists to the Pentagon ????
Yes, they have there, within the framework of PR, all this has long been put on stream.
And you would be better, since a specialist answered my question, with such an explosion, the wave from him dissipated for 100 meters ???? that the aircraft carrier did not even sway, stood as if it were on the ground, and not in the water

[AntiAleks]

No wonder half of it grew. young people dream of leaving - even serving on such a handsome man - arouses admiration. But you can command them.

[Albert1988]

Quote: AntiAleks

No wonder half of it grew. young people dream of leaving

Did half of the young people tell you this?

Quote: AntiAleks

even serving on such a handsome man is admirable.

Go serve - we will laugh when they give you a turn from the gate to serve on it)))

Quote: AntiAleks

But you can command them.

And who will give you?

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: AntiAleks

No wonder half of it grew. young people dream of leaving

Did half of the young people tell you this?

Quote: AntiAleks

even serving on such a handsome man is admirable.

Go serve - we will laugh when they give you a turn from the gate to serve on it)))

Quote: AntiAleks

But you can command them.

And who will give you?

Find videos of Russian-speaking US military personnel on YouTube ...

[Albert1988]

Quote: SovAr238A

Find videos of Russian-speaking US military personnel on YouTube ...

Hint - a Russian-speaking US soldier is not equal to an immigrant over the age of 18 ...

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: SovAr238A

Find videos of Russian-speaking US military personnel on YouTube ...

Hint - a Russian-speaking US soldier is not equal to an immigrant over the age of 18 ...

We're talking about young people ... aren't we?

Who is there raised by FBK and Hodor and whom we all call "bulk"? How old are they on average?
Young people are strong ...

[Albert1988]

Quote: SovAr238A

We're talking about young people ... aren't we?

Only they will not be allowed to immigrate to the United States6 - if the parents only leave and the child is taken away, but this is even good, if we ate about "piling up"

Quote: SovAr238A

Who is there raised by FBK and Hodor and whom we all call "bulk"? How old are they on average?
Young people are strong ...

And they make up a fraction of a percent (well if) of the entire youth of Russia. By the way, not so long ago I talked with these "navalnyats-khodoryatami" - there was an experience - and so put them on all this ideologues. Hodora_navalny is for them just a tusa, to release hormonal steam from a lack of brain. And even if they ate and want to leave for the State, they don't need any service on any aircraft carrier for that organ! they should lie on a beach in Miami and sip cocktails ...
Honestly, I even really welcome to a the youth left.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Albert1988

Quote: SovAr238A

We're talking about young people ... aren't we?

Only they will not be allowed to immigrate to the United States6 - if the parents only leave and the child is taken away, but this is even good, if we ate about "piling up"

Quote: SovAr238A

Who is there raised by FBK and Hodor and whom we all call "bulk"? How old are they on average?
Young people are strong ...

And they make up a fraction of a percent (well if) of the entire youth of Russia. By the way, not so long ago I talked with these "navalnyats-khodoryatami" - there was an experience - and so put them on all this ideologues. Hodora_navalny is for them just a tusa, to release hormonal steam from a lack of brain. And even if they ate and want to leave for the State, they don't need any service on any aircraft carrier for that organ! they should lie on a beach in Miami and sip cocktails ...
Honestly, I even really welcome to a the youth left.

Have you ever looked about the "coronation" that is happening on the Internet?
Young people are almost 100%, refusing vaccinations ...
I understand that this is an artificially created syndrome.
From outside.
And most importantly, the main idea of ​​denial of vaccinations, the rejection of Faith in the leaders of the country.
And that this rejection of vaccinations has very far-reaching plans.
Covid will end, and mistrust in the authorities will only grow.
Those who are now 15-25.
And in a few years, on the following occasion, they will go to the Maidan.
In Moscow.

[sen]

So they did the wrong tests. Our experts showed them how to properly conduct explosive tests on an American aircraft carrier.

[Dimon Dimonov_2]

It was necessary to have a couple of Mosquitoes on board .... I would not have drowned right away - I passed the tests ..... right away - then no.

[Albert1988]

Quote: Dimon Dimonov_2

We should have had a couple of Mosquitoes on board

Better zircons with daggers!

Quote: Dimon Dimonov_2

. would not have drowned right away - the tests passed ..... right away - then no.

And this is how many greens could have been cut later during repairs! It is necessary to give the idea to Yandex!