Military Review

A video of the use of the Chinese anti-ship missile YJ-83 by the J-16 fighter of the PLA air force appeared on the web

56
A video of the use of the Chinese anti-ship missile YJ-83 by the J-16 fighter of the PLA air force appeared on the web

In China, the PLA Air Force held exercises, during which the YJ-83 anti-ship missile was launched from the J-16 fighter. This is reportedly the first demonstration of the capabilities of the Chinese counterpart of the Russian Su-30.


The first images of a PLA Air Force J-16 fighter armed with a YJ-83K anti-ship missile appeared early last year. As the Jane's portal wrote then, the Chinese fighter received new capabilities to combat enemy ships. However, the information was limited to this, since there was no video of practical launches of the YJ-83K. Now there is evidence on the Web that this anti-ship missile can be used by J-16 fighters.

J-16 fighters not only provide air protection for PLA naval ships, but are also capable of attacking large surface ships such as enemy aircraft carriers.

- stated the Chinese edition Sina Military


The Shenyang J-16 fighter has been produced by the Chinese corporation Shenyang Aircraft since 2012. The aircraft is an almost complete copy of the Russian Su-30MKK with a Chinese guidance system, AESA (active electronically scanned array) radar with AFAR, a system for detecting and tracking multiple targets and electronic warfare. In addition, the aircraft received Chinese engines and weapons.

The YJ-83 (C-803) anti-ship missile was first shown in 1999. The range of destruction is declared at 180 km, aviation version - up to 250 km. Warhead - 185 kg. An anti-jamming radar seeker with a wide scanning field is installed on the anti-ship missile. On the cruising section, along with the inertial system, satellite navigation is used, and the flight altitude is controlled by a laser altimeter. In the final phase of the flight, the rocket speed increases to supersonic. Data taken from Chinese sources.
56 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 August 2021 14: 27
    +5
    They showed a little. But it is clear that it is not hypersonic. Warhead 185 kg. Is that enough for an aircraft carrier? And the plane from Sushka is practically indistinguishable. Deja vu is straight.
    1. Tuzik
      Tuzik 7 August 2021 14: 36
      +3
      a glider, a copy of the engines, but the electronics and afar are their own, the question is how many of these missiles will intermeddle with an aircraft, and how many missiles a squadron can launch at an aircraft carrier?
      1. Alexey Sommer
        Alexey Sommer 7 August 2021 14: 39
        -5
        Quote: Tuzik
        intermeddle

        Shame on you?!
        1. alexmach
          alexmach 7 August 2021 14: 41
          -3
          Shame on you?!

          And you?
          1. Alexey Sommer
            Alexey Sommer 7 August 2021 14: 42
            -4
            Quote: alexmach
            And you?

            And more specifically?
          2. Alexey Sommer
            Alexey Sommer 7 August 2021 14: 45
            -8
            Quote: alexmach
            Shame on you?!

            And you?

            Tuzik your dublnik?
            Why are you so tense?
            1. alexmach
              alexmach 7 August 2021 14: 47
              -2
              And more specifically?

              Clear
              Why are you so tense?

              Why are you speaking off topic?
              1. Alexey Sommer
                Alexey Sommer 7 August 2021 14: 50
                -7
                Quote: alexmach
                Clear

                Nothing is clear.
                Explain your understanding?
                Quote: alexmach
                Why are you speaking off topic?

                Drain included comrade electronic general)))
                1. alexmach
                  alexmach 7 August 2021 15: 17
                  +1
                  Explain your understanding?

                  what can be explained to a person expressing his thought in an extremely monosyllabic way? Yes, and not on the topic, and even with transitions to personalities.
                  I condemn.
                  Drain included comrade electronic general)))

                  Have a nice one you too.
                  1. Alexey Sommer
                    Alexey Sommer 8 August 2021 22: 49
                    +1
                    Quote: alexmach
                    what can be explained to a person expressing his thought in an extremely monosyllabic way?

                    Of course, you do not spoil with examples)))
                    ps
                    So what about Double Nicknames?
                    1. alexmach
                      alexmach 22 August 2021 01: 25
                      0
                      Of course, you do not spoil with examples)))

                      Scroll your own scribble back half the screen, well, nothing at all?
                      So what about Double Nicknames?

                      Are you paranoid? Or Sherlock Holmes Syndrome?
            2. Babay Atasovich
              Babay Atasovich 7 August 2021 16: 38
              +1
              Why should you be ashamed if laughing
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 7 August 2021 14: 45
        +13
        2/4 rockets. This is not against aircraft carriers, this is the Chinese Exocet after 100500 plastic and not only operations.


        They also carry YJ-12 - variants of the X-31.

        Before that, leopards (JH7) were carriers.

        Also, the newest version of the J-10 with AFAR made friends with this rocket.


        Well, all this is not for splitting the AUG, though. As an additional threat, yes, but not the main caliber.
        1. Pechkin
          Pechkin 7 August 2021 14: 48
          0
          Mountain Shooter-A is practically indistinguishable from Sushka. Deja vu is straight.
          You generally read the article, it is based on a modification of the SU-30 for China. And a lot of things will not be enough for an aircraft carrier, it depends on the quantity and can be used not only on aircraft carriers. I wanted to be clever, but dovani49 put everything on the shelves laughing
          1. Mountain shooter
            Mountain shooter 7 August 2021 14: 55
            +2
            Quote: Pechkin
            You generally read the article, it was made on the basis of a modification of the SU-30 for China.

            Licensed to issue a copy? wassat I was just reading the article. If they were "creatively distorted", well, some differences would appear ...
            1. Pechkin
              Pechkin 7 August 2021 15: 02
              +1
              Licensed to issue a copy?
              Do not shoot the musician, he plays as best he can wink ... Do you think someone will make a claim. And the differences are in avionics and radar, which engine is more interesting.
              1. Astor 27
                Astor 27 7 August 2021 16: 13
                -10
                What's so interesting about that? Chinese analogue of AL-31F.
            2. Astor 27
              Astor 27 7 August 2021 16: 12
              -9
              The Su-30 MCC was specially developed for China by tender. Tracing paper, equipment, technical support.
              And before that we built a plant for the production of Dryers (they built them themselves - we helped build and set up production).
              1. svp67
                svp67 7 August 2021 16: 43
                0
                Quote: Astor-27
                The Su-30 MCC was specially developed for China by tender. Tracing paper, equipment, technical support.

                No longer, they pushed off our Su-30MKK and created this aircraft, more thrust-armed with a modified airframe and better equipped with electronic stuffing.
                1. Astor 27
                  Astor 27 7 August 2021 17: 33
                  -12
                  You generally read the article, it was made on the basis of a modification of the SU-30 for China.

                  Licensed to issue a copy?

                  They asked, I answered ... winked
                2. Ramzaj99
                  Ramzaj99 7 August 2021 22: 39
                  0
                  Quote: svp67
                  and created this aircraft, more thrust-armed

                  How is it that the plane turned out to be more thrust-armed with the same Russian engines, or less powerful Chinese ones ?? Better the Chinese have not yet been able to do anything, they have not even been able to repeat it yet ...
                  1. Captain45
                    Captain45 7 August 2021 23: 01
                    +3
                    Quote: Ramzaj99
                    Quote: svp67
                    and created this aircraft, more thrust-armed

                    How is it that the plane turned out to be more thrust-armed with the same Russian engines, or less powerful Chinese ones ?? Better the Chinese have not yet been able to do anything, they have not even been able to repeat it yet ...

                    Well, simply because if you read the comments of svp67, it becomes clear that from his point of view, all Russian-made products are so-so, but abroad ... yes there ..., there is there ... not wide- shavyr, and the technique hoo lol
                    1. svp67
                      svp67 8 August 2021 08: 41
                      -2
                      Quote: Captain45
                      Well, just because

                      No, apparently just because someone is still hoping to throw hats at enemies ... Personally, do you have enough hats?
                      1. Captain45
                        Captain45 8 August 2021 09: 25
                        +2
                        Quote: svp67
                        Do you personally have enough hats?

                        Personally, I have enough of one that I wear on my head in winter, but the topic of the state and the number of other people's hats does not give you rest, painful, straight according to Freud lol In his youth, was it a case when Vitya Yanukovych did not commit robbery of hats? belay feel
                      2. svp67
                        svp67 8 August 2021 09: 28
                        0
                        Quote: Captain45
                        Personally, I have enough of one that I wear on my head in winter,

                        Well, well ... it's not enough for one ... what are you going to throw enemies with, I don't understand
                        Quote: Captain45
                        a case of youth when Vitya Yanukovych did not commit robbery of hats?

                        Did you know him personally? That he took off your hat? I sympathize. Although now you can go to Rostov and file a complaint about it. I wish you success.
                        And "laughter for no reason, a sign of foolishness." This is not Freud, this is the Russian people noticed
                  2. svp67
                    svp67 8 August 2021 08: 40
                    0
                    Quote: Ramzaj99
                    How is it that the plane turned out to be more thrust-armed with the same Russian engines, or less powerful Chinese ones?

                    Alas, but your data is outdated, what the Chinese are now putting on their J-16 is a Chinese-made engine and it is 10% more powerful than our AL-31, which we previously supplied, the only thing in which it is inferior in reliability, but this is most likely while.
                    Data from turbofan WS-10A and AL-31F. In particular, the thrust on the afterburner is 12600 kg (12258 kg - the data of AL-31F in brackets), the thrust without afterburner is 7650 kg (7620 kg), the specific fuel consumption on the afterburner is 2,02-2,08 kg / kgf-h (2,0, 0,78), without afterburner / cruising 0,80-0,795 (119), air consumption 112 kg / s (1527), gas temperature in front of the turbine 1392 degrees Celsius (1997), engine weight 1750 kg (8 kg), specific thrust 7,14 (XNUMX)
                3. Volkof
                  Volkof 7 August 2021 23: 05
                  +2
                  More thrust-armed with an analogue of the AL-31F, don't tell my slippers ... Anything but this ... "Ostap suffered ..."
      3. Walking towards the light
        Walking towards the light 7 August 2021 14: 48
        +3
        In the regiment (brigade) of the PLA Air Force 24-30 aircraft J-16. Let's allow 2 missiles on the suspension. We receive a salvo of 60 missiles. Not "sour" however)).
        1. Cananecat
          Cananecat 7 August 2021 16: 37
          0
          Quote: Walking towards the light
          We get a volley of 60 missiles. Not "sour" however

          You can also multiply by the weight of the warhead ...)))
          For the sake of one aircraft carrier, the regiment will not be raised.
          1. Pechkin
            Pechkin 7 August 2021 20: 32
            +2
            For the sake of one aircraft carrier, the regiment will not be raised.
            For the sake of one AUG, there will not be a fact that it will cope.
          2. Volkof
            Volkof 7 August 2021 23: 10
            +1
            What ignorance ... In the USSR, there is a Tu-22M3 regiment for one aircraft carrier group ... In this group there are about 10 ships, usually ...
            Remember ...
        2. Doccor18
          Doccor18 7 August 2021 16: 37
          +3
          Quote: Walking towards the light
          podske.Get a volley of 60 missiles. Not "sour" however)).

          British squadron behind the eyes ... laughing it's not in vain that the tests were just now arranged ...
        3. Volkof
          Volkof 7 August 2021 23: 08
          0
          Average serviceability of 80%, excluding those repaired at factories? Dream must be down to earth ...
      4. private person
        private person 7 August 2021 16: 27
        -3
        but the electronics and afar are their own

        They have their own and whose is ours? Well, it is clear that they collect somewhere in Novosibirsk, and whose components? Educate smart people.
    2. knn54
      knn54 7 August 2021 15: 01
      +1
      -In the final phase of the flight, the rocket speed increases to supersonic.
      Let me disbelieve.
      - Warhead - 185 kg.
      The destroyer, if it hits below the waterline, may not sink, but it will be hard
      1. SovAr238A
        SovAr238A 7 August 2021 16: 00
        +5
        Quote: knn54
        -In the final phase of the flight, the rocket speed increases to supersonic.
        Let me disbelieve.
        - Warhead - 185 kg.
        The destroyer, if it hits below the waterline, may not sink, but it will be hard

        The destroyer, with any hit, no matter where, will be out of the battle 100%, will be out of order at 80-90%, and will also 100% try to return to the base for repairs comparable to the overhaul ...
        1. Doccor18
          Doccor18 7 August 2021 16: 41
          +7
          Quote: SovAr238A
          The destroyer, with any hit, no matter where, will get out of the battle 100%

          This is for sure, the "cardboard-aluminum" hulls of modern warships are incomparable with the armored leviathans of the past ...
    3. Doccor18
      Doccor18 7 August 2021 16: 23
      +3
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Is that enough for an aircraft carrier?

      Enough for what?
      If taken out of the battle, depending on where it gets ... If in the superstructure - quite.
      If you drown - about 15, and that's not a fact ...
    4. svp67
      svp67 7 August 2021 16: 40
      +1
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      And the plane from Sushka is practically indistinguishable.

      Well, this is another development of our Su-27, although the Chinese have improved it a lot ...
  2. svp67
    svp67 7 August 2021 14: 47
    -8
    This is reportedly the first demonstration of the capabilities of the Chinese counterpart of the Russian Su-30.
    No, this is not an analogue of our Su-30, it is more an analogue of the American F-15E ... Alas, this plane is better than our Su-30
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 August 2021 15: 32
      +7
      Quote: svp67
      No, this is not an analogue of our Su-30, it is more an analogue of the American F-15E ... Alas, this plane is better than our Su-30

      Is the Chinese better than the F-15E too, or just our Su-30?
      1. svp67
        svp67 7 August 2021 16: 40
        -3
        Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Is the Chinese better than the F-15E too, or just our Su-30?

        No, only the Su-30 ... to our regret
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 7 August 2021 17: 11
          +3
          Quote: svp67
          No, only the Su-30 ... to our regret

          what modification are you comparing with?
          Su-30SM? Su-30M2?
          1. svp67
            svp67 7 August 2021 17: 15
            -1
            Quote: Flood
            what modification are you comparing with?

            Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2
            1. Flooding
              Flooding 7 August 2021 17: 17
              0
              Quote: svp67
              Su-30MKK and Su-30MK2

              meaning in such a comparison?
              1. svp67
                svp67 7 August 2021 17: 19
                0
                Quote: Flood
                meaning in such a comparison?

                These machines can be compared on the same training ground, and not hypothetically
                1. Flooding
                  Flooding 7 August 2021 17: 25
                  +4
                  Quote: svp67
                  These machines can be compared on the same training ground, and not hypothetically

                  by "our" Su-30, you mean an aircraft not in service with the Aerospace Forces?
                  your will, of course
                  1. svp67
                    svp67 7 August 2021 17: 53
                    -5
                    Quote: Flood
                    by "our" Su-30, you mean an aircraft not in service with the Aerospace Forces?
                    your will, of course

                    He is OUR, like the "Indian", "Vietnamese" Su-30, and which now this J-16 "covers like a bull a sheep"
                    1. Flooding
                      Flooding 7 August 2021 18: 01
                      +3
                      Quote: svp67
                      He is OUR, like the "Indian", "Vietnamese" Su-30, and which now this J-16 "covers like a bull a sheep"

                      I wrote - your will
                      no one forbids comparing the export versions of the Russian fighter with the newest Chinese clone.
                      even though there are more than 10 years between their development
                      1. svp67
                        svp67 7 August 2021 19: 00
                        -3
                        Quote: Flood
                        even though there are more than 10 years between their development

                        But right now and it is they who can converge in the sky in battle ...
  3. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 7 August 2021 14: 56
    +5
    This Chinese "bzdyn!" ... The pilot was going to take longer ... There is this:
    25.04.2018 - 23: 50
    The footage showing the moment when a Russian Su-30SM fighter jet destroyed a warship in the Mediterranean Sea has been published.
    Recall that the military exercises of the Russian Aerospace Forces and the Russian Navy were held off the coast of Syria on April 15 during a period of aggravation of the confrontation with the American aggressors.
    The multipurpose Su-30SM fighter struck with X-35 anti-ship missiles and destroyed the Project 159 Syrian patrol ship, which served as a training target during the maneuvers.

    Everything is clear, but here ... No.
  4. TatarinSSSR
    TatarinSSSR 7 August 2021 16: 01
    +5
    Even the Chinese keep their planes in hangars, and in Russia everything is still under the open sky.
  5. tlauicol
    tlauicol 7 August 2021 17: 35
    0
    Anti-ship missile YJ-83 (C-803). In the final phase of flight, the rocket speed increases to supersonic

    this is clearly a bluff negative
  6. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 7 August 2021 17: 49
    +2
    Well what can I say, just congratulate the Chinese. They do copy, but the best. Flies and shoots.
  7. dub0vitsky
    dub0vitsky 7 August 2021 18: 05
    0
    Quote: alexmach
    Shame on you?!

    And you?

    And you?
  8. Igor_10
    Igor_10 8 August 2021 19: 23
    0
    I, with a parachute jumped from this, this is Corn. And these ones drove MIG 29 to intercept it? )). His quadcopter with Ali Express will intercept))