Advantages and prospects of the "Agriculture" mining system

47

Launchers ISDM "Agriculture" on Red Square, June 24, 2020 Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

In the interests of the engineering troops of the Russian army, a promising remote mining engineering system (ISDM) "Agriculture" has been developed. This complex has already been demonstrated at parades and exhibitions, and the main characteristics and capabilities are also revealed. Now "Agriculture" is undergoing the necessary tests, and in the near future the issue of adopting it will be decided.

Perspective development


According to known data, the development of a new ISDM has been carried out since 2013 as part of the development work with the code "Agriculture-I". The main contractor of the work was NPO Splav them. A.N. Ganicheva (Tula) from the Tekhmash concern. Development took several years and ran into some difficulties.



The first materials on the ROC "Agriculture-I" were presented at the forum "Army-2016". Then the goals and objectives of the new project were revealed. In addition, the printed materials showed the appearance of a self-propelled launcher and a missile in flight. It follows from this that at that time tests were already carried out.

The first public display of the Agriculture product took place last year. Cars of this type took part in the Victory Parade, scheduled for May 9 and held on June 24. By this time, new technical details and characteristics were revealed.


The systems carry out mining. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

At the last MAKS-2021 air show, the development organization showed a model of a launcher and split layouts of mining ammunition. In addition, some of the technical information was re-disclosed. In particular, it turned out that some of the previously known data were erroneous.

"Agriculture" in the troops


Apparently, factory tests of ISDM "Agriculture" began several years ago and were successfully completed. Last year, the equipment was handed over to the army for conducting military tests in conditions as close as possible to real operation.

In August 2020, the Ministry of Defense announced that "Agriculture" and other remote mining systems will be used in the next exercises of the engineering troops in the Southern Military District. In September, experienced ISDM were involved in the Kavkaz-2020 strategic command-and-staff exercises.

A few days ago, on July 30, as part of the exercises of the Western Military District at the Mulino training ground in the Nizhny Novgorod region. new events were held using "Agriculture". In the conditions of maneuvers, these systems for the first time worked out the so-called. blocking mining. According to the scenario of the exercises, the simulated enemy made passes through the mine-explosive obstacles and prepared to advance. The ISDM platoon restored minefields in the shortest possible time and blocked the enemy, forcing him to surrender.

Advantages and prospects of the "Agriculture" mining system

"Farming" on exercises. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Back in December, it became known about the start of deliveries of ISDM "Agriculture" to the troops. In March of this year, they announced the start of state tests, which are planned to be completed by the end of this year. After that, the issues of adopting and launching production will be resolved. At the same time, NPO Splav is already ready to fulfill orders. Last year, it was announced that a new workshop was built at the enterprise, specifically for the production of engineering ammunition.

Technical appearance


The "Agriculture" remote mining engineering system includes several main components. These are a combat vehicle with a launcher, a transport-loading vehicle, a universal transport-launch container and unified rockets with different combat loads.

The launcher and TZM are built on a four-axle all-wheel drive chassis KAMAZ-6560. In both cases, the cargo area is given for the installation of target equipment. The combat vehicle gets a rocking launcher base, fire controls, etc. The TPM is equipped with fastenings for transporting two TPM with missiles and its own crane for reloading them onto a combat vehicle.


Model of ISDM combat vehicle at MAKS-2021. Photo NPO "Splav"

The onboard equipment of the combat vehicle provides the determination of coordinates and the generation of data for firing using different rockets. Mining can be carried out in different modes, incl. automatically. The system operator determines the main parameters of the future barrier, incl. the number of shells and mines in a salvo.

The control system also programs the missiles, setting the distance of the load release, and introduces the parameters of the self-destruction of mines. Based on all available data, the area of ​​the fall of ammunition is determined and a mining map is drawn up. This information is transmitted by radio to the higher headquarters.

Transport and launch container for "Agriculture" is a rectangular assembly of 25 (5x5) guide tubes with rockets. The launcher has mounts for two TPKs. Recharging is done by removing the empty TPK and installing a new one. This allows you to speed up preparation for the next salvo.

The laying of mines is carried out using standardized rockets. This product is a solid-propellant rocket with a cassette warhead with a caliber of 140 mm (previously, a caliber of 122 mm appeared in various publications). The tail section with the engine and fold-out stabilizers has a smaller diameter, probably 122 mm. At the moment, two versions of the missile have been developed, carrying anti-personnel and anti-tank mines. The types of ammunition have not yet been reported.


Split layout of a mining rocket. Photo Bastion-karpenko.ru

Earlier it was reported that "Agriculture" can send mines at a distance of 5 to 15 km. The exact characteristics of the engineered missile are not disclosed. It is only indicated that with one salvo a combat vehicle can cover a large area, the area of ​​which is compared to several football fields. At the same time, mining is also possible in areas of a limited area.

Against the background of predecessors


It should be recalled that our army has a number of remote mining systems in different designs. So, the universal minelayer UMP has become widespread. This machine is made on the ZIL-131 chassis and carries six launchers for universal cassettes with mines of different types.

Recently, a whole family of minelayers "Kleshch-G" of a similar appearance has been developed. They were built on three modern chassis with different characteristics and equipped with modern means of communication and control. Knockout cassettes used by this technique send mines tens of meters away from the minelayer.

For setting minefields at long distances, 122-mm rockets 3M16, 9M28K and similar foreign developments are intended. To launch them at a range of up to 20-22 km, the 9K51 Grad multiple launch rocket system is used.


Serial minelayers UMP during exercises. Photo Russianarms.ru

The ISDM "Agriculture" project develops some of the ideas of previous projects, takes into account their shortcomings and uses modern solutions. So, the principles of work are borrowed from serial MLRS, but specialized ammunition and a special MSA with the necessary capabilities are used. All this provides various advantages over existing remote mining systems.

Important advantages are associated with the novelty of the project and its components. Modern products are characterized by enhanced performance and new capabilities. In particular, the high accuracy of setting mines, the presence of different operating modes, automatic mapping, etc. connected precisely with a modern digital LMS and integrated navigation and communication facilities. The new missile has an increased volume and provides a more complete release of the potential of the electronics.

"Farming" can create minefields at ranges up to 15 km from its position, without being exposed to great risks. The ammunition load so far includes two shells with mines of different types, which is enough to solve most typical tasks. In the future, we should expect the emergence of new similar ammunition, which will expand the capabilities of the complex.


Modern minelayer of the Kleshch-G series. Photo Bmpd.livejournal.com

The ISDM project also resolved organizational issues. The engineering troops are still armed with models with limited characteristics, such as the UMP. MLRS "Grad" with higher parameters are classified as missile forces and artillery, which may complicate their involvement in laying mines. Together with "Agriculture", engineering units will be able to carry out the necessary measures independently and without the participation of another type of troops.

New generation


In recent years, several projects of promising engineering equipment for various purposes have been created in our country. The direction of minelayers and remote mining systems is getting some development. Right now, at least four similar samples with different characteristics and capabilities are in different stages of testing and preparation for operation.

Thus, in the coming years, several new means of laying minefields with different features and different potential will appear in service with the engineering units of the Russian army. With their help, the troops can create a flexible and effective minefield installation system. Thanks to this, mines of different classes and types will remain an effective and useful means of influencing the enemy and will retain their place in the system of weapons of the ground forces.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    5 August 2021 18: 36
    - at ranges up to 15 km from its position, without being exposed to great risks.
    There is no doubt that the ammunition fully complies with the requirements of the Geneva Convention.
    Syria, the Afghan (possibly) border is where to conduct "full-scale" tests.
  3. -1
    5 August 2021 18: 36
    There is no doubt that engineering departments should have their own specialized equipment, but now it is quite possible to unify the MLRS Tornado-G and "Agriculture" as much as possible in order to reduce the price
    1. +3
      5 August 2021 18: 51
      How ? Where is "Tornado-G" (122 mm) and where is "Agriculture" (140 mm)? I think that if it were expedient to keep within 122 mm, then they would have done it! But we chose 140 mm! The question is not technical feasibility, but practical feasibility!
      1. -1
        5 August 2021 18: 57
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        How ? Where is "Tornado-G" (122 mm) and where is "Agriculture" (140 mm)?

        Okay, "Tornado-S"
        1. +1
          5 August 2021 20: 23
          Quote: svp67
          Okay, "Tornado-S"

          There may be a reason in "Tornado-S"! But what if Tornado-S turns out to be "redundant" for other situations and "links"? I once suggested setting a priority on the Uragan-1M bicaliber MLRS and making it a “multi-caliber” one; adding, in particular, 122 mm ... (and not only ...)
          They attacked me so that for those cases and ranks where "Grad" is used, "Hurricane-1M" in the 122-mm version would be "superfluous"! Well, how to please everyone? request Maybe, after all, not "Tornado-S"? And to give, for example, a mining function to TOS? And also BM-14 and RPU-14 in “caliber” 140 mm were “lying around” in warehouses!
    2. 0
      6 August 2021 08: 18
      Quote: svp67
      but now it is quite possible to unify the MLRS Tornado-G and "Agriculture" as much as possible,

      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      How ? Where is "Tornado-G" (122 mm) and where is "Agriculture" (

      "Agriculture" came from the Grad, according to the author, a larger warhead was screwed to the rocket, but the car was made new, smarter, and most importantly, with a replaceable package.
      Now it's time to make a new "hail" out of "agriculture", put packages of 122 mm caliber on the same machine, and also edit the software.
    3. -12
      6 August 2021 12: 44
      but now it is quite possible to unify the MLRS Tornado-G and "Agriculture" as much as possible in order to reduce the price

      It doesn't make sense. For several reasons. The main one is indicated in the article:
      MLRS "Grad" with higher parameters are classified as missile forces and artillery, which may complicate their involvement in laying mines

      In this case, the fight between the start and the nadzhim at the command post of the army cannot be avoided: and given the fact that the start has its own headquarters, the artillerymen will win. wink
      1. +2
        6 August 2021 18: 07
        Quote: Astor-27
        In this case, fights between the start and the nadzh at the army command post cannot be avoided

        There, a chemist can also connect - if, instead of ordering specialized long-range TOS, they decide to simply enter the appropriate shells into the ammunition complexes of conventional MLRS. smile
  4. +4
    5 August 2021 18: 47
    In modern conditions of hostilities, movement is life. Received a volley under the nose of Agriculture, stopped! Wait for anything! There are now plenty of weapons from MLRS to UAVs, you can also beat Iskander. It’s not a camilfo. What human genius has reached. But without it, no matter how.
    1. +1
      5 August 2021 21: 09
      What is the name for the mining system - "Agriculture" um ... And the modern mobile hospital was not accidentally called "Harvest"? winked
  5. -10
    5 August 2021 18: 57
    Who comes up with such stupid names for Russian weapons? Either derivation, or agriculture, or checkmate.
    1. 0
      5 August 2021 20: 27
      Yes, the question is not in the name, Alexander, the question is in efficiency, when the "Katyusha" was also no different in combat, the name was so simple ... And not only in the Russian Federation, but even in the USSR, all the art systems were given flowers. In the Russian Federation we love to call weapons such, quite, not formidable nicknames for ourselves. In the USSR, and by inheritance in the Russian Federation, they are not fond of horrors, but heavenly punishments. So it is not a matter of understanding, stupid, or not stupid, the question of efficiency. To call it a worm, and he can take the glory of the gorynych serpent. Who knows, who knows? Anything can be. This is so, without minus one.
    2. -8
      5 August 2021 21: 11
      How, who comes up with? USE products and hypers. Yes
    3. fiv
      +2
      6 August 2021 08: 39
      Chekmate does not sound very good, but derivation, carnation, khibiny, agriculture are just a song!
      1. +1
        6 August 2021 11: 04
        And yet, at the top of the names for the systems of missile forces and artillery - Buratino :)
    4. +1
      6 August 2021 18: 09
      Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
      Who comes up with such stupid names for Russian weapons?

      And why is the name "Agriculture" bad for a remote mining system? The system is sowing the land - though not with grain, but with mines. smile
    5. +1
      8 August 2021 07: 30
      Quote: Alexander Pseudonym
      Who comes up with such stupid names for Russian weapons? Either derivation, or agriculture, or checkmate.

      Is it necessary to call some formidable name?
      Actually, for example, the name "Satan" was invented by our enemy for a rocket.
  6. +1
    5 August 2021 19: 26
    After that, the issues of adopting and launching production will be resolved. At the same time NPO Splav is already ready to fulfill orders. Last year, it was announced that a new workshop was built at the enterprise, specifically for the production of engineering ammunition.

    The product has not yet been accepted, but the shop is already in place. What is confidence based on? Is the solution already pushed through?
  7. -1
    5 August 2021 20: 51
    request that's why it was to produce entities? What is this essentially new MLRS that could not be implemented on the existing MLRS "Grad", "Uragan", "Tornado" with a simple (regular) modernization? I just saw the budget cut by the defense ministry here ...
    PS: let's re-equip the entire army with unique types of weapons - whatever the battery or battalion is unique and has no analogues in the world! - Either the combat capability will "increase" ...
    1. +1
      6 August 2021 11: 10
      In the course of reading the article, I caught myself on the same thoughts. But after reading the comments above, I noted an interesting idea: what if the developers, so far away, are not promoting a narrowly specialized "analogue" of the Grad, but a possible option for replacing a massive missile defense system with an increase in caliber to 140 ...
      1. +1
        6 August 2021 13: 34
        There are "Tornado" and "Hurricane" with a caliber of 220mm - why another 140? Already in 220mm caliber, you can realize much more than 140mm ...
        PS: emnip our mu..dretsy still want to attach 80mm MLRS to the troops - like, they don't have enough mortars ... So the correct answer - sawing the dough - is obvious here.
        ZY2: but there is also Buratino, Solntsepёk and Tosochka also in the caliber of 220 mm - like, "Hurricane", it was not enough for them, the lobbyists from the military-industrial complex ... But since they already exist, it was possible to use these PUs and not produce entities ...
        1. 0
          6 August 2021 15: 58
          I do not argue that you can mine both from the Tornado and from the Hurricane. But that's not what I mean. Now the trio rszo in our armament looks like this: 122-220-300. Perhaps the developers of agriculture are planning to replace 122 with 140, so that in the future the most massive caliber of the MLRS in our troops would be 140 (instead of 122)
        2. +1
          6 August 2021 18: 14
          Quote: nespich
          ZY2: but there is also Pinocchio, Solntsepёk and Tosochka also in caliber 220 mm - like, "Hurricane" then they, lobbyists from the military-industrial complex, were not enough ...

          Just "Buratino" with "Solntsepёk" are fully justified - these are assault flamethrower systems operating in the combat formations of troops. This is not pure rocket artillery, but something closer to assault SPGs, like the ISU-152.
          But the long-range "TOS" has already climbed into the niche of rocket artillery. Now the RChBZ will have to form a full-fledged readn with all the harness for issuing data for firing, thus duplicating the readn of conventional artillery.
          1. -1
            6 August 2021 19: 27
            Just "Buratino" with "Solntsepёk" are fully justified - these are assault flamethrower systems operating in the combat formations of troops.

            smile gee-gee-gee, no need to wishful thinking. There can be no question of any appearance in the "battle formations of troops" (on the front line, in short) in a war with a normal enemy for "Buratino" and "Solntsepёk"! Instantly cover with mortars or simply from a large-caliber machine gun or cannon BMP / armored personnel carriers shoot a box with guides - then it will blaze ... Such is the "assault SPG" ... Purely anti-guerrilla counter, inapplicable in wars with "big boys". :) cut the dough from the military-industrial complex (in my terminology) ...
            1. 0
              8 August 2021 09: 46
              Quote: nespich
              Instantly they will cover with mortars or simply from a large-caliber machine gun or cannon of an infantry fighting vehicle / armored personnel carrier they will shoot a box with guides - then it will blaze ... Such is the "assault ACS".

              I'm embarrassed to ask - and with WHOM do we have such a war planned - that it will come to large-caliber machine guns ?????
              1. -1
                8 August 2021 09: 58
                Duc, with the same ones with which it will come to the use of TOC ...
                PS: cases of successful shelling of the TOS "Buratino" from the DShK were recorded during the Soviet war in Afghanistan ...
          2. +1
            6 August 2021 22: 47
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Quote: nespich
            ZY2: but there is also Pinocchio, Solntsepёk and Tosochka also in caliber 220 mm - like, "Hurricane" then they, lobbyists from the military-industrial complex, were not enough ...

            Just "Buratino" with "Solntsepёk" are fully justified - these are assault flamethrower systems operating in the combat formations of troops. This is not pure rocket artillery, but something closer to assault SPGs, like the ISU-152.
            But the long-range "TOS" has already climbed into the niche of rocket artillery. Now the RChBZ will have to form a full-fledged readn with all the harness for issuing data for firing, thus duplicating the readn of conventional artillery.

            They are not justified.
            For they are part of a different kind of troops.
            And this is hemorrhoids.
            1. 0
              8 August 2021 11: 37
              Quote: SovAr238A
              They are not justified.
              For they are part of a different kind of troops.

              And assault flamethrowers (the first TOS, not TOS-2) will have to be given to another branch of the army, rather than artillery. You remember that the assault SPGs during the Second World War were given to the tankers - because their tactics were closer to the armored vehicles. They will have different states, because an assault flamethrower with its firing range does not need AIR, georeferencing, data generation for firing, etc. - he does not shoot with the PDO.
  8. +1
    6 August 2021 01: 03
    To be honest, this technique is a consequence of the Cold War ...
    When tank wedges, throws by army corps, etc.

    Where are very highly specialized systems of massive remote mining to be applied now?
    Yes, nowhere ...
    Mining systems through MLRS are much more effective.
    Both militarily and economically
    The system of mining through aviation cluster munitions - albeit more expensive, but also longer-range and faster.

    Creation of very narrow, unambiguous mining systems, separate demining systems, separate thermobaric systems with a range of 4-15 km - and all this is only in the ranks of the engineering troops ...
    Incomprehensible system.
    No logic at all ...
    1. 0
      6 August 2021 08: 26
      Mining systems through MLRS are much more effective.

      So this is the real MLRS,

      Quote: SovAr238A
      Incomprehensible system.
      No logic at all ...

      Yes, just the logic is simple.
      Instead of coordination between the branches and types of troops, each sister is given earrings.
      The miners have their own MLRS, chemists have their own, tankers of the "terminator" instead of a platoon of motorized infantry ...
      1. +2
        6 August 2021 10: 53
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        Mining systems through MLRS are much more effective.

        So this is the real MLRS,

        Quote: SovAr238A
        Incomprehensible system.
        No logic at all ...

        Yes, just the logic is simple.
        Instead of coordination between the branches and types of troops, each sister is given earrings.
        The miners have their own MLRS, chemists have their own, tankers of the "terminator" instead of a platoon of motorized infantry ...

        And now in every field there must be a regiment of artillerymen, a regiment of engineers, a regiment of chemists.
        In full force.
        Each with its own technique.

        although all three tasks are successfully performed by the regiment of artillerymen.
        Just change the type of missiles used and that's it ...
    2. +1
      6 August 2021 18: 25
      Quote: SovAr238A
      Creation of very narrow, unambiguous mining systems, separate demining systems, separate thermobaric systems with a range of 4-15 km - and all this is only in the ranks of the engineering troops ...

      Aren't RChBZ thermobaric systems?
      The worst thing is not the highly specialized nature of these "shtetl" systems. The worst thing is that their functionality is duplicated in conventional artillery. For RS with a thermobaric warhead and shells for remote installation of mines are for standard artillery systems - self-propelled guns and MLRS.
      And not only in artillery this kind of "cross-duplication" is taking place. As soon as the chemical troops acquired the RPO "Shmel", the line infantry requested and received an analogue - the TBG-7V grenade for the RPG-7.
    3. -1
      25 August 2021 00: 52
      I'm embarrassed to ask, have you seen these KMB? I have seen, even on the basis of the X-22. And who in the wide range of their fillings in the Air Force will hang and wear them? Su-24M? Yes, it’s not possible either the Tu-22M3M of which there are almost no in the Russian Federation, or the promising PAK UAV, which has been under construction since the age of thirty! So it's easier to build OTR and SRZO with KBCH. Mortars 160-240mm.!
  9. 0
    6 August 2021 08: 35
    "The TPM is equipped with fasteners for transporting two TPM with missiles and its own crane" - a combat tow truck?)
  10. 0
    6 August 2021 09: 12
    In the USSR, even helicopters were used to install minefields. As the aviation was cut, they returned to the old, time-tested solutions.
    The emergence of such a technique suggests that the concept of a mobile barrage detachment has not gone anywhere, and remains in tactics. Engineers will have their own tool for quick and effective application.
    1. 0
      6 August 2021 18: 27
      Quote: glory1974
      In the USSR, even helicopters were used to install minefields.

      The helicopter mining system (VSM-1) is still there.
      1. -1
        25 August 2021 00: 53
        Yes, only very vulnerable in the light of recent wars. Who will allocate a detachment of forces to guard these helicopters or aircraft?
    2. 0
      6 August 2021 21: 14
      Quote: glory1974
      In the USSR, even helicopters were used to install minefields. As the aviation was cut, they returned to the old, time-tested solutions.
      The emergence of such a technique suggests that the concept of a mobile barrage detachment has not gone anywhere, and remains in tactics. Engineers will have their own tool for quick and effective application.

      And the helicopters and on the zilka were 4 or 6 packages of mass "farming" with mines of huge territories.
      Moreover, the zilok was equal to 3 helicopters.
      But ..
      Yet again.
      This is a weapon of the Cold War, when they operated with the strikes of armies and corps.
  11. +2
    6 August 2021 09: 49
    140 mm?
    Don't they use the mining ammunition created for the MLRS Grad?
    The 3M16 projectile has a length of 3,02 meters and a mass of 56,4 kilograms. In the warhead, five POM-2 antipersonnel mines are placed in one row along the longitudinal axis.
    The 9M28K projectile has a length of 3,02 meters and a mass of 57,7 kilograms. It accommodates three PTM-3 anti-tank mines

    The MLRS "Agriculture" has a more progressive reloading system by changing the TPK, but the efficiency is not comparable to the mining capabilities of the MLRS Smerch (300 mm)
  12. -2
    6 August 2021 14: 05
    I am delighted with the variety of our new products ISDM
    Are you delighted with NATO (?)
    how NATO plans offensive operations in the context of
    complete and already physical denial of access
    1. +2
      6 August 2021 21: 26
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      I am delighted with the variety of our new products ISDM
      Are you delighted with NATO (?)
      how NATO plans offensive operations in the context of
      complete and already physical denial of access


      And now an analogy to your "delight".
      There is a company in our world.
      Motorized rifle.
      Infantry.
      It is armed with Kalashnikov assault rifles with a target range from 0 to 600 meters.

      And now I show you your ecstatic world.
      At the same 400 meters, more than one company is located.
      And already four companies.
      One has purely pistol armament with a range of confident destruction of only up to 20 meters.
      The second company has submachine guns with a range of only up to 100 meters.
      The next third company has strict regulations from 100 to 300 meters with some kind of "unmatched in the world" weapon.
      And there is a company that can shoot over 300 and up to 600 meters.
      And so it turns out that?
      Yes, it turns out full.
      These cannot, and these cannot, and these cannot.
      Out of 4 people, only one can ..
      And all four of them will have to be in the trench ...
      And work for one ...

      Here is a complete transcript of your stupid and irrepressible delight ..
      And if a massive blow is carried out at this location, then instead of one company, four companies will already die ...
      This is already so ...
      Analogy...

      You are an alternate, Agro ...
      Moreover, it has long been out of touch with reality.
      1. -1
        7 August 2021 09: 00
        And then cheers, patriots are constantly grunting about the appearance of another "no analogue in the world" without even thinking about whether it is necessary, and whether the characteristics are true, and so on. And most importantly, they are not at all interested in the fact that this "new" thing will not in any way affect their salaries in terms of their increase and will not lead to an increase in the occupancy of the refrigerator.
        1. 0
          8 August 2021 15: 24
          Quote: Kuzya the Cat
          will not increase the filling capacity of the refrigerator.

          Where are you without a refrigerator, then ...
          And not to support the army, so no one is attacking right now ?? !!
          But what kind of savings, in your understanding, will come immediately ...
      2. 0
        9 August 2021 09: 47
        great alternative
        our motorized rifle companies on BMP-2 (2500 units), BMP-3 (700 units), BTR-82A (1000 units)
        with 30-mm automatic cannons, the range of destruction is 4 km.
        and also BMP-3 have dumps for digging tank trenches
        AK-74 have a range of 600 meters
        AK-12 have a range of 1000 meters
        Pecheneg 2000 meters
        BTR-80 (2500 units) have a KPV 14,5 mm machine gun - 2000 meters
        BMP-2M (200 units) for 30-mm AP + 4 ATGM
        BMP-3F (50 units)
        BMD-4M (341 units)
        and usually motorized riflemen are covered by helicopters: Mi-24, Mi-35, Mi-28, Ka-52, Mi-8AMTSh
        then attack aircraft: Su-25, Su-24, Su-34
        at different distances MLRS and self-propelled guns: Grad, Hurricane, Tornado, Acacia, Carnation, Msta
        1. 0
          April 7 2022 23: 44
          "... then attack aircraft: Su-25, Su-24, Su-34."
          Finally, the Su-24 and Su-34 are front-line bombers.
      3. -1
        25 August 2021 00: 57
        Well, where do we go. All of you whine, there will be a lift to the SRZO with a volley of 320 km. And what do we have?
  13. 0
    April 7 2022 23: 38
    "MLRS "Grad" with higher parameters belong to the missile forces and artillery, which may make it difficult to involve them in laying mines"
    I see no reason not to use Grad in remote mining.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"