The timing and number of launches of ICBM RS-28 "Sarmat" within the framework of flight design tests have been announced

34

Flight design tests of the newest Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile will begin soon, the first launch of ICBMs is scheduled for autumn 2021. So far, only throw tests of the rocket have been carried out.

In total, this year, within the framework of flight design tests of the Sarmat ICBM, two launches are planned. TASS citing a source in the defense industry complex. According to him, the first launch of "Sarmat" will take place in autumn, the second - at the end of the year. There is still no official information on ICBM testing. In the spring of this year, it was reported that three launches of "Sarmat" would be carried out within the framework of the LKI, the third quarter was called the beginning of the tests.



Again, according to unofficial information, the launches will be made from a silo located on the territory of the Plesetsk cosmodrome. One of the planned launches will be at maximum range.

The available official information, voiced earlier by the military, does not say anything about the timing of the launch of the Sarmat ICBM and their number, but notes that the end of the flight design tests of the new Sarmat ICBM is set in 2021. Also this year, the industry should master the serial production of a new weapons and related systems, but there is no data in this direction. The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM on combat duty of the Strategic Missile Forces is scheduled for 2022.

The RS-28 "Sarmat" ICBMs are being prepared to replace the world's most powerful silo-based ICBMs, the RS-20V "Voevoda" (NATO - SS-18 "Satan"); the missile will become the carrier of the Avangard hypersonic blocks. The first complexes will enter service with the Uzhursky and Dombarovsky missile formations.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    34 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      4 August 2021 07: 50
      Also this year, the industry should master the serial production of new weapons and related systems, but there is no data in this direction. The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM on combat duty of the Strategic Missile Forces is scheduled for 2022.
      This is closer to the natural ending. And this is very good! good the mericatos chews a carrot in response. laughing or a banana - in this case it makes no difference. wassat
      1. +11
        4 August 2021 08: 47
        End of the era of Ukrainian yuzhmash)
        Reliable and calm service to Sarmat for many years))
    2. -1
      4 August 2021 07: 51
      Good luck to scientists, engineers, workers and everyone who works with their heads and hands.
      Unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer of them.
      1. +2
        4 August 2021 13: 00
        Quote: Popandos
        Good luck to scientists, engineers, workers and everyone who works with their heads and hands.

        With Sinawa and Liner, the tests were successful.
        With Zircon, all tests are according to plan.
        Sarmat are going to be accepted into service next year.
        When did you see such terms of successful creation?

        Unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer of them.

        Where do such strange, decadent conclusions come from ?!
        Now the work is organized and is proceeding rhythmically.
        1. +1
          4 August 2021 14: 53
          Quote: Alex777
          Where do such strange, decadent conclusions come from ?!
          Now the work is organized and is proceeding rhythmically.

          Everything is correct. The average age of KB employees (those who create and "Sarmat" in particular) is far over 50. It is alarming, but young people are also coming lately. How do I know? Don't ask.
          1. 0
            4 August 2021 14: 58
            Quote: DenZ
            How do I know? Don't ask.

            So I am from the same place. wink
            1. 0
              10 August 2021 16: 47
              So that's great. wink
          2. 0
            6 August 2021 12: 36
            Technically drove off!
            1. 0
              10 August 2021 16: 55
              School of Life... hi
        2. -1
          5 August 2021 07: 35
          Where do such strange, decadent conclusions come from ?!
          Now the work is organized and is proceeding rhythmically.

          At one time, the issue of the assembly and partial production of the Soyuz Angara launch vehicle in the city of Komsomolsk on the Amur for Vostochny was considered, everything came down to one factor, the lack of qualified personnel. Now production is in Omsk, with more complex logistics to Vostochny.
          Something like that, unfortunately, but earlier Komsomolsk on the Amur was an industrial center east of Lake Baikal.
          1. +1
            5 August 2021 08: 49
            Yes, the Far East has suffered greatly and has not yet recovered, unfortunately.
    3. +1
      4 August 2021 07: 58
      Also "Sarmat" is on the way. Straight, our "partners" are happy ... tongue one more "headache" ...
      How to answer?
      Something will be "sanctioned" once again ... Gas to Europe, titanium for Boeing, nuclear fuel (enriched), aluminum ... Stop buying Russian oil too ...
      1. +2
        4 August 2021 08: 28
        Duties on seamless pipes were introduced, as ours were cheaper, and Ukraine, too, for the company with the same pipe at the same place.
    4. +2
      4 August 2021 08: 17
      "Stiletto" about five years to mind (completion of the control system after each launch) was brought up.
      And then a year?
      1. +1
        4 August 2021 08: 34
        unfortunately you are right, Nikolai .. Sarmat has not even flown yet yet .. what kind of weapons next year .. God forbid, in 2023, and then on condition that all tests for 5 pass, which usually does not happen .. but I hope everything however, even in 2023-4 they will be put into service, this is a serious missile in technical terms and its introduction into service is 2-3 times more difficult and more valuable than missiles of the Yars / poplar type.
    5. -1
      4 August 2021 08: 30
      And how do they test for the maximum range, we only shoot at the Kura in Kamchatka. Just start up higher and from there along the Kura hubs?
      1. +4
        4 August 2021 08: 56
        As far as I remember, they are allowed to enter the southern part of the Pacific Ocean, but there are a lot of approvals, so only sometimes ..
      2. -1
        4 August 2021 11: 53
        Quote: tralflot1832
        And as they test for the maximum range, we only shoot at the Kura in Kamchatka.

        ======
        In general, intercontinental missiles (according to the SALT-2 agreement) are considered to be missiles with a flight range of more than 5500 km. Distance from Plesetsk to Kura - approx. 6000 km, i.e. quite "fits" into the concept of "intercontinental range" ...... request
        1. 0
          4 August 2021 12: 03
          The article talks about tests for the maximum range. The declared range is up to 18000 km. It cannot be launched in a circle Plesetsk Kura Plesetsk.
          1. +2
            4 August 2021 12: 11
            Quote: tralflot1832
            The article talks about tests for the maximum range. The declared range is up to 18000 km. It cannot be launched in a circle Plesetsk Kura Plesetsk.

            ========
            So - "around the world" !!! bully
      3. 0
        4 August 2021 13: 02
        Quote: tralflot1832
        And how do they test for the maximum range, we only shoot at the Kura in Kamchatka. Just start up higher and from there along the Kura hubs?

        Did they conduct naval exercises off Hawaii? Prepared. wink
    6. +12
      4 August 2021 08: 39
      do not regret our MO amers, do not regret) then "Prometheus", now "Sarmatians"!
    7. -12
      4 August 2021 08: 43
      ICBM RS-28 "Sarmat" is being prepared to replace the world's most powerful silo-based ICBM RS-20V "Voevoda" (NATO - SS-18 "Satan"), the rocket will become the carrier of the Avangard hypersonic units. The first complexes will enter service with the Uzhursky and Dombarovsky missile formations.

      "Sarmat" will not become the carrier of the "Avangard" blocks, it will make orbital flights through the southern hemisphere bypassing the American missile defense system.
      1. +5
        4 August 2021 08: 54
        in fact, the Vanguard was originally developed for Sarmat .. and the American missile defense system is very mobile and with the help of carriers such as SM6 it can be built up from any side of the strip .. and just the Vanguard is needed so that this build-up does not help them especially .. You somehow do not in the subject, dear man ...
        1. -3
          4 August 2021 09: 17
          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          actually, the Vanguard was originally developed for Sarmat ..

          Avangard was developed for the UR-100. A "Sarmat" is designed for orbital bombardment.

          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          and the American missile defense system is very mobile and can be extended from any side of the strip with the help of SM6 carriers.

          SM6 works on targets during the acceleration phase and therefore is located closer to the borders of a potential enemy, and in the United States, mine-based GBI interceptors (not mobile) are deployed.

          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          and it is precisely the Vanguard that is needed so that this build-up does not help them too much ..

          At the moment, the South of the United States is completely open, there are no GBI position areas or early warning radars. Therefore, it is necessary to enter through the Southern Hemisphere ...

          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          You are somehow not in the subject, dear man ...

          How to know, how to know ...
          1. +3
            4 August 2021 09: 59
            The fact that Avangard is being tested on the UR-100 does not mean that it is designed for this missile. Yes, and it is stupid to somehow develop the latest block for an aging rocket, no? UR-100 on duty until replacement. It was put into service no later than 1980, service life is 35 years. I won't tell you about renewals, I don't remember. But if we consider that satellites are being put into orbit on the basis of the UR-100, the write-off is underway. So there is a replacement.
          2. +3
            4 August 2021 10: 03
            1.
            Quote: grassyknollgunner
            Avangard was developed for the UR-100.

            what you say - in Wikipedia it is written .. and even if you read a little more, and even more so know, you would be aware that the Vanguard was installed on the UR-100 precisely because Sarmat is not yet ready, for which the Vanguard was created .. didn’t think - why do they put the "old" UR-100 into the mines from the "Voevoda"? and the Vanguard is put on it correctly - anyway, it is better than the old BB ..
            2. Orbital bombardment was also related to the development of the Voevoda ..
            3. and somewhere I argue that the minke whales have worse protection from the south? laughing
          3. -1
            4 August 2021 12: 15
            Quote: grassyknollgunner
            Avangard was developed for the UR-100. A "Sarmat" is designed for orbital bombardment.

            =======
            belay fool Of course, I'm wildly sorry, but it seems like the "2 level advisor" was right - you really seem to be "off topic" ........ hi
            1. -2
              4 August 2021 12: 46
              I'm in Topic ...
              1. +1
                4 August 2021 15: 01
                Quote: grassyknollgunner
                I'm in Topic ...

                Maybe in some other. They wrote everything to you in Russian. Admitting your mistakes is rather a virtue than a disadvantage.
              2. +1
                4 August 2021 16: 59
                Quote: grassyknollgunner
                I'm in Topic ...

                Then you know that the standard equipment of the Sarmat is 3 BB Avangard.
                And you also know the scheduled dates for the removal of the UR-100N UTTH missiles from the database. hi
              3. -1
                5 August 2021 13: 53
                Quote: grassyknollgunner
                I'm in Topic ...

                =====
                Judging by the reaction of the "community", people strongly doubt this ... I - too !!! request
    8. +3
      4 August 2021 09: 00
      Yes, apparently we are in a hurry! Straight, as according to the laws of wartime, which was observed in the pre-war and war years of the Second World War. Then some developments were immediately put into service, even before the end of the full set of tests.
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. -1
      4 August 2021 23: 08
      It is interesting.
      From the middle of the XNUMXth century, Polish humanists began to express the idea that the Polish gentry descended from the Sarmatians, an ancient steppe people known from Greek and Roman ethnography. In the XNUMXth century, this thesis became the basis of the ideology of the Polish nobility - the gentry, Sarmatianism (a kind of social racism: the aristocracy was considered the descendants of the Sarmatians, and the common people - the Slavs and Litvinians).
      Who and why introduces such ambiguous names for military equipment?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"