German media: Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts leads to an influx of migrants to Europe

92

Since the beginning of this century, the FRG has been demonstrating a powerless foreign policy, which has already become the usual norm. Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts that periodically flare up outside its borders leads to an influx of migrants to Europe, and primarily to the Federal Republic of Germany.

This opinion is expressed by the German edition Die Welt.



The FRG media believes that the Germans are not trying to contribute to the resolution of conflicts, leaving this occupation to other countries. As a result, Germany has to solve the problem of refugees who arrive in tens and hundreds of thousands from Libya, Syria and Iraq, and recently their flow from Afghanistan has increased, which is associated with the withdrawal of NATO troops from this country.

And although the problem of migrants is extremely acute for Germany, it does not make efforts to achieve its resolution “at distant approaches”. Today, the publication considers the words of the former German Minister of Defense, uttered by him in 2004, to be prophetic. He said that Germany's security is also ensured in Afghanistan.

In modern times, in the conditions of a modern, multipolar and globalized world, no conflict can be far enough away

- says Die Welt.

Earlier, the German newspaper Bild reported that on July 31 in Qatar, Germany held secret negotiations with representatives of the Taliban terrorist movement banned in the Russian Federation. A number of issues were discussed at it, including the security of representatives of German humanitarian organizations who remained in Afghanistan, as well as Afghans who collaborated with the army and police of the FRG.
  • https://www.facebook.com/Bundeswehr
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    3 August 2021 20: 30
    To be honest, I don't understand the problem of the type of illegal migrants at all ... First of all, you need to open fire right at the border when you try to cross it. As in the USSR. Under him, this order did not bother anyone? Those who have already been caught - at least a gold piece of camps for illegal entry. And of course - no benefits, benefits, maintenance and other indulgences. Then - no type of family reunification - the maximum for those who have received a residence permit for their spouse and children. The rest of the relatives are overboard. No citizenship right off the bat - a residence permit for a limited time only for the really needed workers. With the prospect of getting a passport in the distant future, but in the absence of even the slightest violations for this period. He crossed the road to red - immediately back to his homeland.

    And that's it. The problem will be solved by itself. But noneshniy flourishing tolerastism - of course, this will not go. So - Khan Europe .. And it looks like - we are with her ..
    1. +4
      3 August 2021 20: 38
      Quote: paul3390
      Firstly, you need to open fire right on the border when you try to cross it.

      You are apparently an evil forum user, and besides, this is not a method of European liberoids ...
      1. +31
        3 August 2021 20: 41
        I am not evil, on the contrary - as a Soviet person I am entirely for the friendship of peoples. But - until these peoples move to live in my house. And - without my consent. This is where all my internationalism ends immediately.
        1. +14
          3 August 2021 21: 14
          hi could give you 100+
        2. +7
          3 August 2021 21: 39
          Quote: paul3390
          But - until these peoples move to live in my house.

          One resident of the Kuban told me that now they have a lot of Kurdish emigrants. Moreover, almost every second is listed as disabled, you see that they would not be heavily loaded with work, and the benefit ...
          In general, as workers, it is better not to rely on them.
          If the information is not reliable, please correct it.
          1. +5
            4 August 2021 01: 06
            Quote: Bad_gr
            Moreover, almost every second is listed as disabled
            And who accepts them "with love" and draws up disability? Maybe all our problems lie in this.
        3. -18
          3 August 2021 21: 44
          Friendship of peoples does not mean coexistence within their national apartments, without migration to other national apartments. And cohabitation within the framework of education, like the USSR / EU / USA, without borders and national apartments, when everything is mixed together. This is what the friendship of peoples is called. Otherwise, you are an ordinary nationalist, chauvinist, xenophobe. And no one should ask you whether you want someone from another country to come to your country for permanent residence or not. Every person has the right to live where he wants and he likes, etc. He should not have any obstacles for this.
          1. +13
            3 August 2021 21: 49
            You have a very strange idea of ​​the realities of the USSR .. What - did you meet a lot of Caucasians and Asians in our cities then? Yes, one! Because - the Union rigidly controlled internal migration through registration. On their own - no one could move anywhere. Instead, they raised the welfare of the national provinces, often even excessively. This is the friendship of peoples, when you help your neighbors to solve their problems, and do not transport them to live with you ..

            And no one has any rights to climb into my house without asking. And for those who wish, there is my sacred right to defend my home and family in any way. You are my friend - tolerast vulgaris. Because of those like you, European civilization will collapse.
            1. -9
              3 August 2021 21: 58
              The problem of Europe with regards to migrants, religious. It is the religion and belief of Islam that does not allow them to accept the rules and culture and history of those countries where they came with regards to the countries of Europe, but at the same time climbing into a strange monastery with their own charter. This is the whole problem. So they were brought up and raised, to promote and propagate their faith and religion, with the rejection of someone else's, which is the primary task. Such people cannot be adapted and assimilated. They still remain self-sufficient, preserving their identity. This is the merit of their mentality and Islam. Therefore, there should not be any religion or belief, then everything will be the same for everyone.
              1. +7
                3 August 2021 22: 51
                Try to dissuade Muslims from abandoning their religion! A teacher in France joked about a prophet and was left without a head in the literal sense of this phrase, how do you want to abolish religion, what to replace ???? Multiculture has failed.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +1
                    3 August 2021 23: 14
                    Do you want to take away their children from Muslims and raise them sterile without religion and in a new culture ??? How do you imagine this in practice and not in plans?
                    1. -8
                      3 August 2021 23: 18
                      A kind of colonies, educational camps, institutions for children and the future generation. Where there is nothing superfluous and unnecessary that can spoil the sterility of a person at the educational period and level. A kind of pioneer of the camp in the USSR, but without the opportunity to live at home in a dangerous and unnecessary environment. Something like that)
                      1. +1
                        3 August 2021 23: 46
                        How will you technically send children to such camps, if I can say how many Muslim parents would agree to give their children VOLUNTARY ????
                      2. -4
                        4 August 2021 01: 23
                        This is the business of the government and government programs. And that shouldn't be private. In fact, it is like calling up the army, which most often cannot be avoided. So it is. For a child, and this is essentially from an early age, not re-educated and not sent to such camps, in the future may pose a danger to society.
                    2. 0
                      3 August 2021 23: 19
                      It's just that if you educate them in a new way in schools and then they will come home and there parents who are closer to them and their faith will put them more dogmas of their faith and all your work will go to dust.
                      1. -3
                        4 August 2021 01: 24
                        Depends on the formation and maturity of the individual. After all, the same Muslims will not give up their faith, religion, culture and other things, under any pretext. Even children. Therefore, the more formed a person is, the more difficult it is to change him.
                  2. +1
                    4 August 2021 01: 10
                    By murder ... - so you are a chauvinist. Better xenophobia from afar and without killing than tolerance and a sea of ​​blood. You contradict yourself. The next generation ... yes, they will grow up and parroit for their parents. Or do you offer them to erase or destroy the memory of all up to the kids ??? Yes, you are a maniac, Mr. Crill ... (just don’t about love after all the above written) In general, utopia and fantasy are also dangerous.
                    1. -4
                      4 August 2021 01: 28
                      This is a radical measure. For people who live according to Islam and follow Islam cannot be re-educated or changed. Yes, and they need to be put somewhere and all that. And if there is a question of faith and religion and its leveling, this issue in this case cannot be resolved until their carriers are exterminated. For they will not voluntarily refuse, and are not subject to re-education and change. What to do, what to do? They will poison themselves and put everyone else on the wrong and dangerous path, and especially both their children and strangers. Therefore, in some issues, one cannot do without extreme measures and radicalism.

                      You don't need to destroy kids. For they are still subject to re-education and change, in contrast to older and older individuals, not to mention adults and older.
                      1. 0
                        4 August 2021 01: 31
                        Individuals ??? Not Napoleon ... the campaign you swung higher. In general, there are private clinics for this ...
                      2. -2
                        4 August 2021 01: 32
                        What's wrong with this term? This is a scientific term.
                      3. 0
                        4 August 2021 01: 39
                        Of course, of course scientific, it happens.
          2. +7
            3 August 2021 21: 50
            Quote: Ela Myaushkina
            Every person has the right to live where he wants and he likes, etc. He should not have any obstacles for this.

            But at the same time, a person who comes to a foreign country should not download rights, establish their own rules and laws, impose their opinion on local residents. He MUST obey the laws and regulations of the country where he came. If not, roll back, without any excuses
            1. -5
              3 August 2021 21: 55
              Everything is correct. But in this case, there should be no religion and belief. And culture and rules should be neutral, comfortable, acceptable, taking into account the interests and rights of each and every one. Then everything will be fine)
              1. +10
                3 August 2021 22: 05
                Isn't it easier for everyone with their own faith and their own rules - just to sit at home? And not to climb into strangers?
                1. -7
                  3 August 2021 22: 12
                  It’s not easier when you want to live well and know how people live in other countries. You will always strive there, in search of a better place in the sun.
                  1. +8
                    3 August 2021 22: 20
                    Make your country the best place in the sun !! And not to wander around strangers, in search of ready-made!
                    1. -11
                      3 August 2021 22: 27
                      Planet Earth is one and common for all. Which means that everyone has the right to live wherever he wants. A person does not have a single place and attachment where he should always live without leaving this place. This rule is artificial and contrived.
                      1. +8
                        4 August 2021 01: 27
                        Then let's move the Arabs from the Middle East to the tundra - and what, the Earth is a common home! Let them graze the reindeer! They are complaining about the lack of water - and then there is water, at least eat it! True, in winter - only in solid form. But in the summer - at least fill up!
                      2. -2
                        4 August 2021 01: 29
                        Why not? You can) An Arab does not mean that he should live only in the Middle East. And the Japanese on the patch of land of the rising sun. And so on down the list. This is not a rule.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                3 August 2021 22: 43
                Well, try to PLEASE everyone !!!!! And I will only look at you from afar, or do you think that someone should come and come up with ???
        4. +4
          3 August 2021 21: 44
          The Europeans are to blame for the fact that their filthy NATO climbed into Iraq, Libya and Syria. And thus they turned the entire Middle East into a hotbed of terrorism and migration. Destroyed someone else's house, wait for uninvited guests in yours. What else did you want?
        5. +6
          3 August 2021 22: 28
          Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts leads to an influx of migrants to Europe
          So I did not notice that our intervention in the military conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia led to the outflow of these horsemen from Russia request
        6. 0
          4 August 2021 02: 02
          Are you blind? How many barmaley people have moved to Russia from Transcaucasia and Central Asia with their wives, children and donkeys, and why didn't you shoot ???
      2. -1
        4 August 2021 01: 40
        The Germans, back in 1945, were instilled with an unwillingness to interfere with anything at all.
        1. 0
          4 August 2021 04: 28
          A little earlier, in the winter from 1942 to 43
    2. +11
      3 August 2021 20: 39
      It seems to me that the USA paid for this publication in Die Welt.
      The problem of migrants is exclusively related to:
      1) The unleashing and financing of the United States of many local wars in Africa and the Middle East
      2) EU emigration policy
      No one, except the United States, benefits from sending German troops to various conflicts that do not concern Germany. But the United States - yes. Our troops are no longer enough.
      1. +4
        3 August 2021 21: 08
        The conflicts in the Middle East are very much about Germans and other Europeans. After all, when countries there turn into hot spots, refugees go to Europe, not to the States.

        Another question is that sending German troops there absolutely does not solve this problem in any way, it can only aggravate it. An example is Libya, where it is not clear what began due to foreign interference in the country, it has been going on for ten years and there is no end in sight.
        1. +4
          3 August 2021 21: 16
          Quote: Kuzmitsky
          Conflicts in the Middle East are very much about Germans and other Europeans. After all, when countries there turn into hot spots, refugees go to Europe

          Do not confuse cause with effect. These countries turn into hot spots when they are bombed or funded by NATO
          1. +3
            3 August 2021 21: 49
            Quote: Shurik70
            Do not confuse cause with effect.

            I will support this opinion.
            First, they bombed the house where these future emigrants lived, and then
            a good guide for them in Europe. So they are going.
        2. +3
          3 August 2021 22: 04
          If they do not want to feed the "refugees" themselves, let them provide transport to reach the "coveted" American coast!
          When the Rwandan massacre began, what did the Germans do?
          Nothing ... Like the UN itself.
          They "forgot" how well they helped Yugoslavia to "disintegrate" with their "peacekeeping".
      2. +2
        3 August 2021 23: 05
        Quote: Shurik70
        The problem of migrants is exclusively related to:

        I will not say about all migrants, but only about the Turks. Because illegal ones can be at the border shoot to wrap up home, but what about legal, Turks?

        The Germans should have scratched their turnips 50 years ago, not now. When the Labor Agreement was signed between Germany and Turkey. And then, when families began to reunite. Then, as the Humpbacked Bald Dog said,
        the process has started
        , and now it goes like an avalanche and uncontrollable. The Turkish diaspora in Germany has NATURAL, excluding migrants, an increase of 1,5% per year. Did the Germans even dream of this in wet dreams? They are dying out and aging (as a nation).

        And wars, American intrigues - this is so ... Additional weight.

        And more about the Turks. The third or fourth wave of legal Turkish migration (I did not count it on purpose) was immediately after the "unification of Germany". The West Germans, who were already fed up with the Turks, began to transport them to the eastern lands with permission to export their villages from Turkey to Germany. And it turned out that cho ...

        It would be better if the Slavs were discharged. Look, Ukrainian Poles and other Czechoslovakians. They are always ready to be slaves and dream that even if not their children, at least the grandchildren will become full-fledged Germans. And a Turk in Germany will have grandchildren as Turks, and great-grandchildren, and great-great-grandchildren.

        Why is there so much about Germany and the Turks? Because friends of my parents, Russians, have been living in Germany for 60 years, and their children, respectively, my friends, also live. And they see this problem every day on the street. ...
    3. +2
      3 August 2021 21: 19
      I completely agree. The problem is sucked from the thumb. Any normal country has the right to defend its borders, otherwise why are they needed then? The most effective way is a machine gunner on a tower, a minefield on the border and mobile mobile detachments of border guards with sheepdogs. I think Russia and Germany could have agreed on this issue long ago, to the mutual benefit of both. Europe is full of parasites from all over the world, and there is no one to master Siberia. And then, after all, China can begin to develop.
      1. 0
        3 August 2021 23: 19
        Quote: Gennady Zavalov_2
        in the future, a trip to the Northern Urals, with its rich reserves of minerals. I think Russia and Germany could have agreed on this issue long ago, to the mutual benefit of both. Europe is full of parasites from all over the world, and there is no one to master Siberia.

        Only towers with machine guns are still indispensable here. They were traveling not to the Urals, but to Germany. And they went not to work, but to live on welfare. Well, maybe trade. As a last resort.

        So machine gun towers "Egoza", if you rush to pull Germany out of the migration crisis, must be stored in advance and for future use.
    4. +2
      3 August 2021 22: 26
      Quote: paul3390
      To be honest, I don't understand the problem of the type of illegal migrants at all ... First of all, you need to open fire right at the border when you try to cross it. As in the USSR. Under him, this order did not bother anyone? Those who have already been caught - at least a gold piece of camps for illegal entry. And of course - no benefits, benefits, maintenance and other indulgences. Then - no type of family reunification - the maximum for those who have received a residence permit for their spouse and children. The rest of the relatives are overboard. No citizenship right off the bat - a residence permit for a limited time only for the really needed workers. With the prospect of getting a passport in the distant future, but in the absence of even the slightest violations for this period. He crossed the road to red - immediately back to his homeland.

      And that's it. The problem will be solved by itself. But noneshniy flourishing tolerastism - of course, this will not go. So - Khan Europe .. And it looks like - we are with her ..

      There is no need to shoot, it is stupid to cancel the benefits and they themselves will leave, and the rest do not support even coming.
      1. +1
        3 August 2021 22: 49
        Under the USSR, no one fired when crossing the border at once.
        There are rules. Violators detained... They could be anyone: lost tourists, defectors with important information ... There are a lot of options. The fire was opened on those who offered resistance trying to hide.
        Later it was decided what to do with those who were on the territory. And there, too, there were a lot of options: deportation, trial and serving a sentence, granting political asylum ...
        And so, as at the beginning of the article it is proposed to immediately open fire ... So it was not with us, but in the GDR on the Berlin Wall.
    5. +1
      4 August 2021 01: 07
      It seems that Germany decided to cover up the problem of unwanted migrants in the old fashioned way) through military expansion, mobile gallows and touring gas vans. It remains only to nominate the young artist-corporal to the chancellorship.
    6. 0
      5 August 2021 10: 29
      Quote: paul3390
      To be honest, I don't understand the problem of the type of illegal migrants at all ... First of all, you need to open fire right at the border when you try to cross it. As in the USSR. Under him, this order did not bother anyone? Those who have already been caught - at least a gold piece of camps for illegal entry. And of course - no benefits, benefits, maintenance and other indulgences. Then - no type of family reunification - the maximum for those who have received a residence permit for their spouse and children. The rest of the relatives are overboard. No citizenship right off the bat - a residence permit for a limited time only for the really needed workers. With the prospect of getting a passport in the distant future, but in the absence of even the slightest violations for this period. He crossed the road to red - immediately back to his homeland.

      And that's it. The problem will be solved by itself. But noneshniy flourishing tolerastism - of course, this will not go. So - Khan Europe .. And it looks like - we are with her ..



      Oddly enough, but there is such a vile character on Echo, under the name of Latynin.
      An unrealistically vile creature. Extremely anti-Russian and liberal.
      So even she was pecked to death for suggesting to treat illegal refugees as it was 50 years ago - as border trespassers.
      The hype is now going on about this ... Uh ...
  2. -1
    3 August 2021 20: 32
    Why, then, for example, refugees do not burst into Japan ....?
    1. +5
      3 August 2021 20: 33
      You still have to get there .. And Japan is a very closed society for foreigners. Nobody there will clatter with the gaijins. It's pretty harsh.
    2. +3
      3 August 2021 20: 40
      Because it's easier to break into Europe.
      1. +1
        3 August 2021 21: 11
        There it is SATTER and you can get up well, a lot of things.
    3. -2
      3 August 2021 20: 43
      Germany, all people (refugees) are brothers, Keep up the good work. They will work for you, serve in the Bundeswehr and even win the Olympic Games. They will cancel parent1, parent 2. The only inconvenience is the burqa for women and dishdash for men.
      1. +1
        3 August 2021 21: 12
        Yeah, and all around are Muslims.
        1. -2
          3 August 2021 21: 50
          It seems like they lived normally with the Turks, but here a couple of Masulman lamas, you can handle it. There was nothing to bomb Libya, in Syria to help the barmaley of Assad
          remove from power, hang Saddam, bring democracy to Afghanistan. And most importantly, there was nothing to bomb Yugoslavia in Europe. We would have lived in peace and waited for the coming of the covid. But no, we wanted to rule the world. That's what we got, the United States is far away, and the Muslims are nearby. 90 on the Reeperbahn in Hamburg, in the evening only Russian was heard, but now what?
    4. 0
      3 August 2021 21: 20
      Maybe the distance + buns and nishtyaks for crossing the border are not given.
    5. +1
      4 August 2021 10: 31
      I am more interested in why Muslim refugees do not flock to the rich countries of the Persian Gulf. After all, brothers in blood, culture and faith. Bad thoughts appear.
  3. +4
    3 August 2021 20: 54
    ... "He said that Germany's security is also ensured in Afghanistan" ...
    In fact, these words are lies and profonation!
    And the less the West would meddle in the affairs of other states, the less problems would now be for those states that they "set on fire" and for Europe itself.
  4. +7
    3 August 2021 20: 57
    In modern times, in the conditions of a modern, multipolar and globalized world, no conflict can be far enough away


    Did the Germans recognize multipolarity? surprise for the USA ...
    1. +5
      3 August 2021 22: 33
      Quote: cniza
      In modern times, in the conditions of a modern, multipolar and globalized world, no conflict can be far enough away


      Did the Germans recognize multipolarity? surprise for the USA ...

      In September, the owner will correct them.
      1. +1
        4 August 2021 08: 11
        And what, post-election layouts, can fundamentally change something?
        1. +4
          4 August 2021 09: 00
          The Germans hope so, but I have big doubts ...
    2. +1
      4 August 2021 08: 09
      Come on, we put on a lot of polarized glasses and the world began to play differently / differently!
      Hi soldier
      1. +4
        4 August 2021 08: 59
        Good time! hi

        There is a big game going on and the price in it, for the Germans, is very high ...
        1. +1
          4 August 2021 10: 12
          Hi soldier
          The game, of course, goes on, only some of them play and flirt until ... a lot of foolishness and many places.
          1. +4
            4 August 2021 11: 41
            Some who lost their heads from past "successes" and decided that everything is possible for him ...
            1. +1
              4 August 2021 13: 23
              As for the success ... it's hard to judge.
              Of course they "know better" ....
              In my opinion, they get a big mess all the time.
              1. +5
                4 August 2021 13: 26
                Quote: rocket757

                In my opinion, they get a big mess all the time.


                And they do it on purpose, and not because they did not know ...
                1. +1
                  4 August 2021 13: 48
                  They don't always get what they planned ... even more so now. The masters of the old school are gone, and the young growth ... is not ice.
                  1. +5
                    4 August 2021 14: 07
                    Yes, the professionals were replaced by bloggers, the result went downhill from year to year ...
                    1. +1
                      4 August 2021 14: 26
                      The result, the level of the toolkit, corresponds to the general development, the state of society and governing bodies. A clear relationship in everything.
                      1. +5
                        4 August 2021 14: 34
                        Unfortunately, and this can be traced in all spheres of life ...
  5. +2
    3 August 2021 21: 09
    Something I do not remember that during the reign of "dictator" Gaddafi from Libya there was such a flow of refugees, but did not France destroy this country with the support of Germany ???
  6. +2
    3 August 2021 21: 09
    I just didn't understand one thing: is this German author satisfied with the situation he described, or not?
    1. 0
      3 August 2021 21: 56
      Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
      I just didn't understand one thing: is this German author satisfied with the situation he described, or not?

      He was clearly paid well. And why not write? After all, he will not be sent to hot spots, and money will not be taken from his pocket for benefits to visitors who are not very eager to work. The author wants Germany to get involved in the war? And after that, will the Germans stay there at all? Or will there be only Muslim refugees?
  7. +2
    3 August 2021 21: 35
    Interesting theory. Apparently in view of my limitedness, it seemed to me on the examples of Syria, Libya, etc. and etc. that it is military conflicts that lead to an influx of migrants to Europe.
    1. +2
      3 August 2021 21: 44
      military conflicts lead to an influx of migrants to Europe

      Then why exactly to Europe? The rich countries of the Persian Gulf are much closer, and is there the same faith and customs? But - they do not burst there. So it’s not just about the war. Mostly in European freebies and tolerances.
      1. +1
        3 August 2021 21: 49
        Well, here Germany remains hostage to the feeling of guilt for the crimes of Nazi Germany. It was Merkel who pushed through the migration issue in the EU with all her might. After all, after the departure of the Britons, she had the reins of government in the European Union. And the main thing is that she pushed through. Other countries look at this much more coolly (France, Greece) or quite negatively (Poland, Tribaltic extinctions). I don’t know how she did it, but the fact that it was she who played the first violin is a fact.

        What about this with all sorts of the UAE, Qatar, etc., I do not know at all. But the same Turkey sipped grief over this. Yes, Edrogan had a trump card for blackmail in negotiations with the EU on this issue, but I do not think that the Turks were happy with a couple of million refugees on their necks.
        1. +1
          3 August 2021 21: 52
          Germany remains hostage to guilt for the crimes of Nazi Germany

          When did Nazi Germany have time to make a mistake before the Negroes, Turks and Arabs ?? belay Apparently - I did not study history well .. what
          1. 0
            3 August 2021 21: 56
            Crimes against humanity. There is such a term. Formed due to the theory of the superiority of the Aryan race. Only then did the Jews on a national basis, Russians, and so on and so on suffer. And now the division goes according to the color of the skin and the victims of hostilities in the states. The same eggs only in profile.
            1. 0
              3 August 2021 21: 58
              This did not at all prevent the nemchure from allying with the Hungarians, Finns and Japanese. Which, well, never once are Aryans. Yes, and with the Arabs and the Turks - Aloizievich seemed to have a very warm relationship ..
              1. 0
                3 August 2021 22: 16
                Well, politics is politics. It doesn't have to be logical, it should be consistent with the goals of the leadership. Remember the wars for Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulcher. Then, faith played a much larger role in Western society than it does now (precisely in the West, because the radical currents of Islam are the *** that is politics among certain elites in our time). German society repented and paid until the beginning of this century. Enough has already been said. And the migration issue is part of Merkel's perfectly played domestic policy. Another thing is that the attempt to cover up this guilt with these actions was met with approval by the German society before they felt in their own skin what it is when the districts turn into ghettos where no one speaks German, everywhere is a foreign culture and it is very unsafe for representatives the fair sex to walk at night in some locations. But these are the consequences. Like the Maidan in Ukraine. They also wanted a different life, lace panties and in the EU. The reality turned out to be different.
  8. +7
    3 August 2021 22: 26
    Somehow they confuse the cause with the effect.
    And the root cause of the flow of refugees is the intervention of the West in the affairs of the East.
  9. +3
    3 August 2021 22: 29
    Quote: Clear
    Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts leads to an influx of migrants to Europe
    So I did not notice that our intervention in the military conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia led to the outflow of these horsemen from Russia request
  10. 0
    3 August 2021 22: 41
    The Germans do not have everything. Big Politicians want. Sit down already! They won back ... No.
  11. +2
    4 August 2021 00: 55
    ... Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts that periodically flare up outside its borders leads to an influx of migrants to Europe, and primarily to the Federal Republic of Germany.


    ... And although the problem of migrants is extremely acute for Germany, it does not make an effort to achieve its resolution "at distant approaches".


    I would like the Russian Foreign Ministry to finally overcome its "shyness" and find time to remind a number of "German media" that in the XNUMXth century Germany already had experience of both active participation in military conflicts and the resolution of possible migration problems " on the distant approaches. "

    Directly on the territory of the occupied countries. With the help of machine guns and concentration camps.

    And to remind how it ended for Germany ... the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 and the Verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal of 1946.

    I wonder if the Germans wanted thrills again?
  12. +2
    4 August 2021 06: 34
    No need to put a cart in front of a horse! It is NATO's intervention in military conflicts that leads to an influx of migrants!
    1. +1
      4 August 2021 08: 00
      They gave birth to it, in its present form and scale, it covered them ... JUST!
  13. +1
    4 August 2021 07: 58
    German media: Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts leads to an influx of migrants to Europe
    ... And the magazine / L / Lugi did not confuse anything ... however, as indicated to them, so they write!
    Migration of people for a better life here / there was, is and will always be !!! This is a natural process.
    That tsunami that covered those who greatly contributed to its occurrence can be called differently ... KAROY HEAVENLY, a suitable name?
  14. +1
    4 August 2021 09: 37
    Your stupid laws and spinelessness lead to the influx. And nothing more.
  15. +1
    4 August 2021 09: 45
    With fools. Just a ban on the entry of migrants and the problem is solved.
  16. ada
    0
    4 August 2021 10: 14
    Germany's non-intervention in military conflicts that periodically flare up outside its borders leads to an influx of migrants to Europe, and primarily to the FRG.

    It is not for this that it is contained, the tasks of the FRG are different - the vector is cut in the other direction and its "non-interference" in this direction is the main thing, observed with the naked eye right next to us, and attempts to "jump off" to the secondary ones are rigidly suppressed.
    It's funny about the "influx" of migrants - the old idea of ​​saturating European countries with labile human resources in the general strategy regarding the "eastern" direction (nothing has changed dramatically over the years). It is carried out in a planned manner using a "historical" moment, effectively stimulated and somehow controlled. Combining these two essentially different processes is misleading.
    Germany's problem is not in the influx of migrants, but in the readiness of their "assimilation" and organization of "application or use" for their intended purpose, as in other countries of "concentrators". Personnel, costs, efforts, planning .... Everything is very long-term, but I want to live now.
    In this regard, it is necessary to pay attention to the initiatives of the countries of the continent to create their own European Army, the dump of brites (as if "we are not in business, by ourselves") and their "independent" agreements with Ukraine on the organization of the WB, some processes in Turkey (in including an attempt at a coup), NATO's military development of new territories, the rise of revanchist militant sentiments in general, with an overlap of history, the impact on our closest neighbors, the exhilaration of the Baltic countries, Asia and the Far East, .... Find at least one inconsistency with the plans for strategic containment of RUSSIA based on the concept of being surrounded by local border conflicts, international pressure on the issues of equitable distribution of resources, disputed territories, economic impact on specific regions, there is no point in listing the rest. What will happen to migrants in a couple of generations and where will their concentration be, in what condition? Here is the question, and we ourselves know how to speak our teeth, otherwise they are "not involved", especially on the Ukrainian bridgehead.
  17. -1
    5 August 2021 12: 34
    Hungary Babaev is not accepted and there is no problem

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"