The United States intends to show Russia and China the "global capabilities of the American fleet"

The US Navy has launched the most global naval exercise since the Cold War, LSE 2021 (Large Scale Exercise 2021). According to the press service of the American fleet, the exercises involve the main warships and amphibious landing forces.

The exercises will be held in 17 time zones at once and will last until August 16. They involve 36 warships from five operational fleets, including aircraft carriers and nuclear strategic submarines, deck and sea aviation, parts of the marines of the fleets and individual corps, etc., a total of about 25 thousand military personnel.

Large Scale Exercise (LSE) 2021 will demonstrate to our rivals that the U.S. military maintains a high level of operational readiness through, not in spite of, a global presence.

- said in the message of the command of the US Navy.

The main task is to demonstrate the ability of the United States to wage war on several fronts at once and respond to the aggression of Russia and China. To this end, the exercises will be held, including in the Black and Mediterranean, East China and South China Seas. Those. the exercise should show Russia and China the "global capabilities of the American fleet" to conduct coordinated operations in several theaters of operations at once, including the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

As stated in the command of the US Navy, an exercise of this magnitude was last held in 1981, but their tasks are the same. The US Navy will once again demonstrate "NATO's resolve and US capabilities."

Comments

[Voltsky]

the bulk of goods from the Russian Federation pass either by land or in the water area which are either controlled or fired upon by the "self-defense" forces.
ps you can't play Privateers with the Russian Federation

Much of China's exports still go by sea; but off the coast of China, the PLA is still controlled, and where not, the Chinese bake ships there

[Artyom Karagodin]

Up to 80% of Russia's exports go by sea. Almost all grains, metals and much more. Even oil is most often transported by tankers.

[Voltsky]

Quote: Artyom Karagodin

Up to 80% of Russia's exports go by sea. Almost all grains, metals and much more. Even oil is most often transported by tankers.

Quote: Voletsky

RF passes either by land, or in the water area which or controlled or shot forces of "self-defense".

try reading before writing

[Artyom Karagodin]

And how will you shoot through the Mediterranean Sea and the oceans with "self-defense" forces? Especially when you consider their number against the background of NATO and Japan.

[Voltsky]

the Black Sea fleet and tartus with khmeimim were created just for this; to ensure its presence in the Mediterranean and, if necessary, to escort ships in this area

[Artyom Karagodin]

Well, yes, especially when you consider that the Black Sea Fleet has only four surface ships capable of operating in the DMZ.

And secondly, off the coast of India or China, we will probably also defend our interests from Tartus?

[Voltsky]

how many ships do you need to escort convoys in peacetime ?!

the Indian Ocean and the surrounding area are not included in the safe navigation zone for the Russian Federation

[Artyom Karagodin]

How did you decide that convoys are needed for escort in peacetime? And what if there is a naval conflict with the same Turkey, which has a half dozen pennants only for operations in the far zone?

As for the Indian Ocean, the lion's share of oil and grain exports goes through it, if anything. So there are transport arteries that are very important for us. It was not in vain that the USSR kept serious forces there all the time.

[Voltsky]

In peacetime, the latter period, if you haven't noticed, has become fashionable to arrest ships; so that the possibility of escorting will not be superfluous.

If there is a war with Turkey, it will be a kirdyk for both.

[Artyom Karagodin]

Well, since you didn’t understand, I’ll clarify: why did you decide that convoys are needed for escorting ONLY in peacetime? And I will draw your attention to the following: look at the Russian traffic across the Mediterranean and calculate whether we have enough ships to cover this mass from arrests and so on. Even in times of peace

It's just that your first comment gives off an obvious blanket in the absence of elementary knowledge of the subject that you are commenting on. Hence the counter-arguments and disadvantages (though not all of them are mine).

You argued that Russia is able to ensure the safety of its sea trade traffic with the available forces, plus you clearly meant that we export more by land than by sea. Both are mistakes. They have been pointed out to you.

[Voltsky]

no, hats are not about me :)

I proceed from the fact that there is already some kind of cover; and if you destroy it, then this is an escalation leading to no one knows where.

And my friend, if you want to argue who is more knowledgeable in some issue ... we just shower each other with theses from related topics, and this will never end. We can talk about the ESPO pipeline, and about the rest ... which is very far from the Indian Ocean :)

[Artyom Karagodin]

The pipeline carries a maximum of 20 million tons of oil. Look at what percentage of Russian exports this is.

[Harry.km]

Quote: Voletsky

I proceed from the fact that there is already some kind of cover

The presence of presence rests against the lack of conformity ...

[Voltsky]

Quote: Artyom Karagodin

It's just that your first comment gives a clear headscarf

ps
I proceed from the assumption that a conflict between the SGA and the Russian Federation is unlikely ... because there will only be losers; even if nuclear weapons are not used; in view of the need to overstress all forces

[Lykases1]

Most likely you are right. But it's still a shame to see the power of the US fleet and the power of the Russian fleet.

[Artyom Karagodin]

You are off topic. I only wrote to you about the "land" nature of Russia and about the fact that we will protect all our trade traffic with what we have. Although you mentioned the "self-defense" forces. Apparently, we are talking about DBK and MPL with corvettes, missile boats and naval aviation. Both theses are false.

[Voltsky]

I think that's enough for now.

So it will be clearer ?!

Russia is a rapidly aging country, with a bunch of well-wishing neighbors; and also very poor ... I understand that I want both the fleet and the death star. But what is is and is

[Artyom Karagodin]

Then initially it is worth writing "In my opinion", "In my opinion", "I believe that", etc. And in your comments (with the exception of the last three) there was no hint of doubt.

[Voltsky]

and I have no doubt because; The Russian Federation will not allow the destruction of its fleet, because further on it will be possible to forget about its existence.

Consequently, a small trough with 8 pkr and weak air defense is sufficient protection; otherwise, a massive strike on naval bases is required and rather a vigorous one.

[Artyom Karagodin]

Quote: Voletsky

Therefore, a small trough with 8 PKR and weak AA defense is sufficient protection

From what? From a salvo from an American destroyer? Or from the Japanese diesel-electric submarine? This time.

After the Russian-Japanese fleet, we had no more. Nevertheless, no one tried to conquer the state. But there was a revolution. Why do you think that such a scenario is not allowed now? They gouged our fleet or one of some formations, and then immediately said that they were against further escalation. Say, let's stop the fighting.

What, in this case, can be used to cover the "enemy" with a nuclear strike? But the current forces of the fleet will not be able to break a serious rival. The same Japan, for example. We'll have to swallow the pill and deal with an angry population, which for many years was blown into the ears that our fleet "is able to prevent any aggression", but in the end it turned out that all this is a lie.

[Voltsky]

You think too fatally, I don't seem to be too much of a hat-gunner either ... But you are now playing the alarmist, but everything is bad if you do not say a word to x; but panic aside. There are no threats that are not stopped in the European theater of operations, and in the direction of THAT everything is relative in shit, but you can live

and it's already good to minus.

[Artyom Karagodin]

Quote: Voletsky

and it's good to minus

Yes, I agree, here I went through. Already corrected. But not everywhere.

No, I'm not calling for panic. You just need to include the most negative scenarios in the calculations. As the saying goes, "hope for the best, prepare for the worst." Do you think I would be glad if everything developed approximately the way I described?

[Voltsky]

Do you think I would be happy with my scenario, where tactical nuclear weapons are used to stop the conflict?! :)

I proceed from the fact that at the moment the Russian Federation is able to stop threats within Eurasia - that's all. Is that enough ?! Well, given the country's capabilities, I think - Yes !!!

[Artyom Karagodin]

In fact, it's not that simple. If we talk about threats from land - then yes, moreover, with a margin, as they say. But at sea, a very bad tendency is developing. The site is full of publications on this topic. Moreover, literate.

[Artyom Karagodin]

Abroad, too, there are no fraudsters, and they perfectly understand that this is exactly what Russia wants. So it will not be as easy to achieve non-interference as you say. Advise: read more on this topic. Here, on "VO", the same Andrey from Chelyabinsk, Timokhin, Klimov wrote quite well on this topic.

[Voltsky]

Quote: Voletsky

we just shower each other with theses from related topics, and this is where it will never end

Quote: Artyom Karagodin

Abroad, too, they do not sit fraudulently, and they perfectly understand

this is what I was trying to avoid, because we differ in approaches, and it will be difficult for us to agree with each other.

Thank you, we chatted about the rules :) otherwise we will dominate here.

[Artyom Karagodin]

The main thing is that in the end we heard each other. All the best

[Maikcg]

Why do you think that while our fleet is being crushed, something extremely serious will not fly into the grinder? They'll sink it in 5 minutes, then say, oh FSE, let's not pump it anymore? Why would that be? Any massive launch (otherwise the fleet cannot be won) will have an adequate response.
Or inadequate, as anastasis will say.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: MaikCG

Why do you think that while our fleet is being crushed, something extremely serious will not fly into the grinder? They'll sink it in 5 minutes, then say, oh FSE, let's not pump it anymore? Why would that be? Any massive launch (otherwise the fleet cannot be won) will have an adequate response.

But America is probably not given to understand that the global capabilities of the army and navy can only be demonstrated by a global war.
Everything else is bodybuilding and fitness. Who has enough intelligence and money for that. In any case, not kickboxing or combat sambo.

[venik]

Quote: Voletsky

try reading before writing

======
Try first dealbefore "commenting" .....

[Lionnvrsk]

The United States intends to show Russia and China the "global capabilities of the American fleet"

This is a deviation however! It's just some kind of pathology, in which the Americans demonstrate their "global capabilities", while receiving moral and physical satisfaction.

As a rule, these "exceptionalists" do not plan to establish direct contact themselves. Physical satisfaction is achieved due to the fact that after the demonstration, the exhibitionist can immediately start dreaming and masturbating and as a result, bring himself to an erection.

[Anachoret]

Mattresses fell in love with "exercising with large sizes")) they are doing more exercise that they will tear the heating pad for themselves on the fascist cross)) for the amusement of Russia and China))

[Boris Ivanov]

in this context, it is very important that the PRC does not show the "global capabilities of the Chinese fleet" to the Americans. blessing they have something to show amers.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Boris Ivanov

"Global capabilities of the Chinese fleet"

Amphibious assault in small strike groups of one million people?

I'm kidding, of course. Indeed, there is something to show. If North Korea showed America to the whole world, and America pretended to pass by, then the Chinese can all the more.

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: Voletsky

or by land

And exactly by land? Or maybe some of the sashimi?

[Voltsky]

Marfa Matveyevna well, my dear, did you find me here too ?! well, fig with you, put 2

[tihonmarine]

The US Navy will once again demonstrate "NATO's resolve and US capabilities."

Let's go brave weevils! It is you who show to the world, and to yourself, how strong you are.
But in fact, we are scared of ourselves.

[Vladimir Mashkov]

The Americans decided to once again brandish their weapons, threaten the world ... Well, well, let's see. Will they scare you?

[tralflot1832]

So what, we saw two aircraft carriers loaded with aircraft on the decks in Los Angeles. Until the fleet reaches our shores, there will be only ashes from the states. In Afghanistan, they won with one aircraft? Then it's another matter. One type of troops won't win the war. China hasn't stopped taking garbage from the USA for processing yet?

[Voltsky]

They achieved all goals in Afghanistan; and when they leave, they still make a fierce trap for all of Afghanistan's neighbors

[tralflot1832]

What goals did the United States achieve in Afghanistan? Afgan has become a secure, democratic state? As it was a Masulman state, it has remained the same. It was not us who killed the Afghans for 21 years, and no one has canceled blood feud.

[Voltsky]

and when did the Americans set themselves the goal of improving life in the occupied territories?
Black cash coming ?! Great - it goes !!!
The CIA works through drug dealers ?! Works great
With the departure of the SGA from Afghanistan - the situation is heating up ?! Heats up to the limit

[tralflot1832]

It is heating up in Afghanistan, I do not argue, or do you think the bearded are controlled from the CIA. We have already taken measures or a carrot or a whip. The second time we will not step on the Afghan rake.

[Voltsky]

I think the beards are not controlled and decentralized, but this does not mean that they cannot be used for their own purposes

[tralflot1832]

So we will manage them. This is the best option, well, at least give hints.

[tralflot1832]

By the way, our Foreign Ministry very nicely spoke about the bearded, what Russia expects from them.

[tralflot1832]

Yes, exactly about this one who stopped the wars in these countries. I am proud of the Russian Foreign Ministry!

[Voltsky]

and how many wars have stopped ?!
And how many Tajiks apologized for "Russians don't leave, we need slaves."
How many countries have ceased to call Russians invaders and have remembered that these cattle had previously sold us like cattle in the slave market in Alexandria?
Where are the wreaths, and the confessions of the Turks, Azeris and Crimean Tatars who cursed their ancestors in Venice on the Slavic square, for the harm done to us ?!

[Revival]

)))))))))
So we will win!))

[Salavatsky Ministry of Emergency Situations]

Damn, no matter how they melt each other there ...

[Docx2032]

"including aircraft carriers and nuclear-powered strategic submarines, carrier-based and naval aviation, units of the marines of the fleets and individual corps"

Did not help

[tralflot1832]

Sorry, for American lovers, I must decipher. This is the Pueblo, the only captive US ship that is permanently docked in the DPRK.

[Poschli]

Hitler, the earth to him and his last descendants, glass wool, also "showed" the "global capabilities" of the Wehrmacht

[Jacket in stock]

Well, the flag in their hands and a drum around their neck.
Let them demonstrate.
Let them play around and amuse their pride.
Fortunately (for them), while there is still an opportunity.
The main thing is that none of their morons should take it into their heads to demonstrate their strength not in toys, but in real.

[Wolf]

The funniest thing:

The main task is to demonstrate the ability of the United States to wage war on several fronts at once and respond to the aggression of Russia and China.

Let the head show where Russia and China did aggression against which state, and then you can see the Chinese Sea IN FULLY CAN CONTROL THE FLEET CHINA, RUSSIA NOT NEEDED BY THEM !!!
As for the Mediterranean Sea from Syria in FULL CONTROL !!!
As for the Japanese Navy, the very deadly mistake of the Japanese will be if they join the pack of HYENES, there will be no Japan and the Japanese!

[1536]

Indeed, the Americans have nowhere to put their money! There are 20 million hungry people in the United States, according to the president. At least they fed these people, and did not engage in saber-rattling.

[Galleon]

Do we have the strength to reveal the course of the exercises in all their depth and interaction, to decipher and generalize for subsequent combat training? I really want to hope that there is.

[sanya_sergant]

You have already shown your determination to Kim.
Only the heels sparkled.

[Prisoner]

They do not throw out any knees, as soon as they do not grimace just to try to convince everyone that they are still quite good.

[Bullba]

Quote: Artyom Karagodin

Quote: Voletsky

Therefore, a small trough with 8 PKR and weak AA defense is sufficient protection

From what? From a salvo from an American destroyer? Or from the Japanese diesel-electric submarine? This time.

After the Russian-Japanese fleet, we had no more. Nevertheless, no one tried to conquer the state. But there was a revolution. Why do you think that such a scenario is not allowed now? They gouged our fleet or one of some formations, and then immediately said that they were against further escalation. Say, let's stop the fighting.

What, in this case, can be used to cover the "enemy" with a nuclear strike? But the current forces of the fleet will not be able to break a serious rival. The same Japan, for example. We'll have to swallow the pill and deal with an angry population, which for many years was blown into the ears that our fleet "is able to prevent any aggression", but in the end it turned out that all this is a lie.

Did you at least understand what they said, or is it Hitler the liberator for you? Puncture mister State Department official!

[7 poplar]

if only the rubber band on the rub ..... x did not burst from the show.

[petrol cutter]

Russia, as I can see from the map, is mainly not an island in the middle of the ocean.
Therefore, the global maneuvers of someone's fleet ...
As well as the current Olympics.
Of course they are interesting. But not really.
Such a squiggle.

[businessv]

The main task is to demonstrate the ability of the United States to wage war on several fronts at once and respond to the aggression of Russia and China.

Funny wording! I wonder when it was here, or when the PRC had exercises of this magnitude ?! And who the aggressor really is was always clearly and openly visible due to the fact that minke whales are not particularly embarrassed to start wars or armed conflicts, not bothering with anyone's opinion, but always call their aggression "a response to aggression."

[businessv]

Quote: Voletsky

this is the one that fucked up Armenia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and other countries ?! Are you talking about this mid ?!

No, this is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which quite adequately and adequately represents Russia in other countries of the world and voices Russia's intentions towards anyone abroad, and those who screwed up the countries you indicated call themselves the Russian elite and effective minieters. It will not hurt you to more seriously understand the competencies of the Russian services before scribbling posts.

[businessv]

Quote: Voletsky

Russia is a rapidly aging country, with a bunch of well-wishing neighbors; and also very poor ...

Damn, well, really, be clearer, please! Russia is the country with the largest amount of resources in the world, therefore it is the richest country, whose citizens cannot properly dispose of these riches! Our country was made "poor" by our own compradors, managers, oligarchs and other riffraff who had the opportunity to steal!

[grassyknollgunner]

The Americans have a hysterical campaign. The unipolar world is crumbling before our eyes. Well, you have to spend $ 20 trillion dollars (the amount of the US national debt) and you will not achieve anything. Loch is fate as they say ...

[George Koval]

No matter how these exercises become the prologue of the upcoming coup d'etat in Russia in connection with the elections on September 19 of this year. G....

[Maikcg]

It is unclear how the fleet will resist the missile-tank blitzkrieg on land .. an aircraft carrier in the steppes near Toulouse.

[Zx_spectrum]

let our naval forces and videoconferencing study, and wipe their hands,
since the United States will give out all its tactics.

[tolmachiev51]

- "The American Navy will once again demonstrate" NATO's determination and the capabilities of the United States. "This means that not everything is as rosy as you would like !!! that everything has changed fundamentally. The DPRK is no longer afraid of you.

[nikolaj1703]

Gentlemen, Americans, it's time for you to change your methods of warfare. Your method is outdated, so you can only fight with natives, but not with armies armed with modern weapons. The surface fleet is an excellent target for cruise missiles and aerospace forces.