Serbian analyst: Opening of the Kosovo embassy in Israel will alienate Muslim countries from Pristina

46

Several states will withdraw their recognition of Kosovo. We are talking about African and Middle Eastern countries.

This was stated by the Serbian newspaper Politika, referring to the analyst of the Center for Social Stability of Serbia Predrag Rajic.



In order not to incur the wrath and pressure of Washington on these states, it was decided not to name them. But, judging by the region where they are located, it can be assumed that countries are meant in which the majority of the population is Muslim.

Actually, it was easy to guess that the opening of the Kosovo embassy in Israel would alienate Muslim countries from Pristina. According to Rajic, with this decision, Pristina harmed herself.

The Serbian analyst notes that Belgrade is doing its best to prevent the official international recognition of Kosovo and its entry into the United Nations. And although Serbia is a NATO member, first of all it hopes for support from Moscow and Beijing, which consistently advocate the preservation of its territorial integrity, in contrast to most Western countries advocating the "independence" of Kosovo and Metohija. The latter strive to ensure that Pristina receives recognition from at least 100 countries that are members of the UN.
  • https://www.facebook.com/albini2017/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    3 August 2021 12: 38
    More than 10 embassies of Muslim countries have been opened in Israel. And nothing terrible happened.
    1. +7
      3 August 2021 13: 01
      Nonsense is written by a Serbian analyst, by the way, Azerbaijan also opened a trade office in Israel, the flag is raised, in a year at most, the Azerbaijani embassy in Israel will also be there.
    2. +1
      3 August 2021 13: 05
      It seems to be about the embassy in Jerusalem. This is not the same as just an embassy in Israel.
      1. +3
        3 August 2021 17: 00
        And although Serbia is a NATO member

        Are the journalists completely stupid? It's not even the exam level! lol
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. +5
      3 August 2021 12: 50
      1) crooks - yes
      2) The western bank of the Jordan River is called much more prosaic - Judea and Samaria. The question is, what are the Arabs doing there. request
      3) They were taken away from Syria after the Syrian aggression - that is, if you start wars, then somehow win them, or do not fight at all, which is much better
      4) Jerusalem was appropriated long ago - 3500 years ago, approximately, was recaptured from the Ibusei. It is necessary to find the Ibusei and negotiate with him on the transfer of Jerusalem back and officially condemn the aggressive policy of King David.
      5) But why the Jews of Kosovo is also unclear to me. Maybe they cut off the supply of coconut from Colombia to Israel? request (Albania is the number one consumption in Europe).
      1. +7
        3 August 2021 13: 26
        Quote: Krasnodar
        It is necessary to find Ibusei and negotiate with him on the transfer of Jerusalem back and officially condemn the aggressive policy of King David.

        Good idea for the Arabs. Right now there will be descendants of "Eve's slave" winked as "children of Lieutenant Schmidt"
        1. +1
          3 August 2021 13: 57
          Greetings, Gennady! hi
          So the Jews will have direct witnesses - well-preserved centenarians, participants in those events. Seemingly you won't give more than 40, but in fact - for 3500 ... fellow
          1. +5
            3 August 2021 16: 48
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Greetings, Gennady! hi
            So the Jews will have direct witnesses - well-preserved centenarians, participants in those events. Seemingly you won't give more than 40, but in fact - for 3500 ... fellow

            The truth was revealed during the days
            dispelling the fog of legends:
            it’s more difficult for Jews to live
            among other Jews.


            hi Welcome.
            1. -1
              3 August 2021 17: 14
              Yes and no, depending on when))
      2. +2
        3 August 2021 14: 28
        Quote: Krasnodar
        The western bank of the Jordan River is called much more prosaic - Judea and Samaria. The question is, what are the Arabs doing there.

        Kindergarten, pants with straps!
        See how many historical places have names belonging to other peoples, religions, nations
        1. +1
          3 August 2021 14: 51
          I agree, but this is not the answer to my question. hi
      3. +4
        3 August 2021 14: 54
        Quote: Krasnodar
        But why the Jews of Kosovo is also unclear to me.

        And as always, politics.
        When Lieberman was Foreign Minister, Israel did not want to recognize Kosovo until other countries did.
        But after Serbia voted to recognize Palestine as a 195 member of UNESCO, against Israel's will, Lieberman recalled a Russian proverb:
        "As far as it comes, it will respond."
        1. 0
          3 August 2021 15: 34
          Then everything is clear hi
      4. +1
        3 August 2021 17: 11
        If we approach from the point of view of history, then on the western bank of the Jordan and before the Jews, someone lived, respectively, it is necessary to return them. Regarding the Golan Heights, it is a big question who attacked whom, and by the way there is a UN Security Council resolution on the return of these territories. Jerusalem was divided much later than the Ibuseans, and by the way, the Arabs had it for several centuries, and again it was officially divided into Jewish and Arabic, and again the Jews behaved boorishly. Regarding victorious wars))) the whole secret of Jewish victories is in Washington. But what if tomorrow the situation changes to the exact opposite?
        1. +1
          3 August 2021 17: 38
          If we approach from the point of view of history, then on the western bank of the Jordan and before the Jews, someone lived, respectively, it is necessary to return them.

          Of course it is. To all Moabites ... fellow
          Regarding the Golan Heights, it is a big question who attacked whom, and by the way there is a UN Security Council resolution on the return of these territories.

          The UN is like that boy to Babel, who always has something to say - about the Golan, about the Crimea, about deep concern about African genocides.
          There are no questions there:
          1948 - in the army of the Arab League
          50th to 67th - shelling, in 80% of cases, Israeli civilians
          early June 1967 - aerial bombardment of Israeli territory, shelling of Israeli n / a, etc.
          Jerusalem was divided much later than the Ibuseans, and by the way, the Arabs had it for several centuries, and again it was officially divided into Jewish and Arabic, and again the Jews behaved boorishly.
          Officially, no one has ever divided it into Hebrew and Arabic. lol He was supposed to remain under international jurisdiction, but the Jordanians and the Israelis grabbed what they could during the war started by the Arabs.
          As for "boorishly" - the king of Jordan decided to act smartly, without attacking the Israelis after the attack on Egyptian airfields, he opened fire on Tel Aviau from Long Toms and the Jewish honor of Jerusalem from everything that was at hand at the city garrison - machine guns, mortars and other
          Regarding victorious wars))) the whole secret of Jewish victories is in Washington. But what if tomorrow the situation changes to the exact opposite?

          I apologize wildly, but Israel's main territorial conquests happened during the American aid to Jordan - money, weapons, intelligence during the war. Friendship of Jews with Washington began after the direct intervention of Soviet troops on the side of Egypt in 69-70, before that the USSR helped Syria with the UAR only with weapons and advisers hi
          1. -4
            3 August 2021 17: 45
            And who are you telling these tales to?))) Israel was created on the money of wealthy London and New York Jews and always sat under the Anglo-Saxon "roof", otherwise the times of Emperor Trajan would be repeated and Israel would be written about in the past tense))) I history studied a little wider than the school curriculum)))
            1. +2
              3 August 2021 17: 53
              And to whom do you tell these tales?))) Israel was created on the money of wealthy London and New York Jews and has always sat under the Anglo-Saxon "roof

              lol
              French Rothschild. Edmond, to be exact. And the wealthy New York Jews at the time of the creation of the Zionist project could be counted on one hand. laughing
              and always sat under the Anglo-Saxon "roof"

              Yes, especially in the period between 39-47, when Jewish terrorists Etzel-Lehi-others fought against the Anglo-Saxon roof in Palestine)))
              I studied history a little wider than the school curriculum)))

              You can see it, yeah wink laughing
              1. -1
                3 August 2021 22: 59
                If you count all the rich New York Jews, there will not be enough fingers on your hands or on your feet, not only you, but your entire entrance)))) Kuehn, Loeb, Schiff, Warburg, brothers Lazar, Dylan and Reed, Balmont. This is so, offhand - not particularly straining your memory)))
                1. -1
                  4 August 2021 09: 18
                  If you count all the wealthy New York Jews, there will not be enough fingers on your hands or feet, not only from you, but from your entire entrance)))

                  This is from the 1950s and 60s, the Zionist project (settling the Land of Israel, known to the general public as Palestine) began in the late 19th century.
                  laughing
                  Kuhn, Loeb, Schiff, Warburg, brothers Lazar, Dylan and Reed, Balmont. This is so, offhand - not particularly straining your memory)))

                  Kyon, Loeb, Kuhn and Schiff - yes, Warburg - from their crowd of German Jews who came to the States, one of the Lazar brothers settled in New York (French Jews), Dylan and Reed - no idea who they are, like Balmont) )
                  Of these, only the first three can be called New Yorkers)).
                  1. +1
                    4 August 2021 12: 29
                    All of these are only a small fraction of the very wealthy Jews who have lived in New York from the 19th century and earlier. Do you know August Balmont?))) Go to Wikipedia, look at the bank office "Dylan & Reed" in the same place))) you will learn a lot of interesting things about New York Jews. At what, I repeat - these are the richest, but there were many, just the rich)))
                    1. -1
                      4 August 2021 16: 03
                      Not found, but not the essence.
                      Of the wealthy Jews, the Zionists were supported only by the Englishman Montifiori and the Frenchman Edmond Rothschild.
                      American Jews - the support was from the activists of the women's society Hadassah - the construction of hospitals, training of "Palestinian" doctors in the States and the arrival of American specialists in Jewish settlements for "master classes". The girls collected money from all Jews - rich, poor, average, beggar.
                      They stopped working in the 29th due to the crisis.
                      The rich Jews of New York - there were very few of them, they did not have a purpose to sponsor Jewish settlers, the grandmothers were transferred to organizations.
                      At the beginning of the 20th century, 80% of the New York Jewish community were poor immigrants from Ingushetia hi Now yes - the bulk of the rich, + -
                      1. 0
                        4 August 2021 22: 17
                        Hrenasenki beggars))) I would like to be such a beggar))) immigrants from the Republic of Ingushetia, relatively recent emigrants - yes. But there were a lot of people who moved from England, Germany, etc. - not at all poor. The fact that they did not give money openly does not mean that they did not give at all. Jacob Schiff from "Kyung & Loeb", the Japanese emperor awarded two orders for his assistance in the Russo - Japanese War.
                      2. -1
                        4 August 2021 22: 40
                        Fucking beggars))) I would like to be such a beggar)

                        Sleeping six of us in a two-room apartment with cockroaches (large, American, flying), plowing for 12 hours a day on physical work for a penny, etc.? what No, well, people are different, everyone has their own buzz request
                        immigrants from the Republic of Ingushetia, relatively recent emigrants - yes. But there were a lot of people who moved from England, Germany, etc. - not at all poor.

                        Of course there were - from Germany and France, mostly. But there were few of them.
                        In Europe, then there was a lot of money, they were going to the States to linearly diversify the existing business for the sake of, in the overwhelming majority of cases.
                        The fact that they did not give money openly does not mean that they did not give at all

                        Why didn't they? They gave on an equal footing with others, small amounts. They did not believe in the Zionist project, for them the States were the Promised Land.
                        Jacob Schiff from "Kyung & Loeb", the Japanese emperor awarded two orders for his assistance in the Russo - Japanese War.

                        Quite right - and he helped the Japanese because of Nicolas' refusal to abolish the Pale of Settlement. But he did not particularly invest in the Zionist project, unlike the French Jews and some English ones.
                        The French began to invest after the Dreyfus trial.
          2. -1
            4 August 2021 07: 15

            Krasnodar
            Yesterday, 17: 38
            NEW
            ... in 80% of cases, Israeli peacekeeper
            don't you want to tell people to their faces your nickname for them? No? That's right, because they'll be torn to pieces. Ultimate blasphemy! angry
            1. +1
              4 August 2021 09: 30
              Uchi-pusi, the "acting ZMS in boxing" can tear someone to pieces lol Or freestyle? Or maybe a literball? wink
              Blasphemy - read the story, for example, the results of the Syrian shelling of Israel in the first 4 days of the six-day war:
              205 houses, 9 chicken coops, 2 tractor parks, 3 clubs, 1 canteen, 6 barns, 30 tractors and 15 cars were hit by shells; 175 acres of orchard and 75 acres of crops were burned out; casualties - 2 killed and 16 wounded, mostly light. "

              hi
              1. -1
                5 August 2021 03: 38

                Krasnodar
                Yesterday, 09: 30
                9 chicken coops, 2 tractor parks, 3 clubs, 1 dining room, 6 barns,
                wassat laughing lol why didn't you count the latrines? laughing Or did you think the Jews will be stroked on the kippah? tongue behind what fought for it and ran into it !!! wassatpi.si. you bought the rackets for the rusty Prish Davidovsky kumpola from the Palestinian flying pipes? how much did it cost, eh? I suppose it is hundreds of times more expensive than used metal pipes.
                1. +1
                  5 August 2021 09: 19
                  Yes, but the Syrians feel sorry for the Golan lol That would not start a war against Israel, they would have been theirs, and there would be more people left - to please Europe with a large number of refugees Yes
                  Money is not a Jewish problem, you know fellow , but the Palestinians are strained with this - sadness crying
  3. +10
    3 August 2021 12: 45
    Did I miss something? Did Serbia become a member of NATO at night? Didn't it appear yesterday evening? recourse
    1. +5
      3 August 2021 12: 54
      I didn't understand either, by the way laughing
      1. +1
        3 August 2021 12: 59
        I don't know how to copy, wait they'll fix it.
    2. +7
      3 August 2021 13: 31
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Did I miss something? Did Serbia become a member of NATO at night? Didn't it appear yesterday evening? recourse

      By the way, who will answer the bazaar? winked
  4. -2
    3 August 2021 13: 00
    What kind of nonsense in my opinion ..
    How can the opening of the embassy of a Muslim country (go republic) alienate Muslims?
  5. +8
    3 August 2021 13: 03
    And although Serbia is a NATO member

    Guys, what are you guys ?! This is when Serbia became a member of NATO, what nonsense?
  6. +4
    3 August 2021 13: 05
    Serbia is not a NATO member.
    "Not at NATO!"
  7. +3
    3 August 2021 13: 25
    ... although Serbia is a NATO member

    Serbia is not a NATO member formally, but has assumed the obligations of a NATO member in fact.
    In 2015, the Parliament of Serbia, the Skupschina, ratified a secret agreement with NATO known as the SOFA (Status of Forces Agreement), which was signed in 2014. According to the agreement, Serbia, not being a NATO member, assumed obligations equal to those of full NATO members. As a result, Serbia de facto became a NATO member with obligations but no rights [54].

    On February 19, 2016, Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic signed an agreement with NATO, according to which the representatives of the Alliance receive special diplomatic immunity and freedom of movement within the country, as well as access to Serbian military facilities. [55]


    1. -2
      3 August 2021 13: 40
      Yes, they signed some harmful agreements with NATO, but that would be a NATO member IS FAR OR BETTER EVER !!! wink
      In addition, if something happens, God forbid the war that NAOO would pass through Serbia under these agreements and that they would have "diplomatic status" laughing laughing laughing They will be held in the horizontal, and Serbi will get a lot of good equipment for free, but this does not need to be publicly spoken about. laughing
    2. 0
      3 August 2021 14: 22
      Quote: Avior
      Serbia is not a NATO member formally, but has assumed the obligations of a NATO member in fact.

      Ukraine did not sign anything at all, and in fact is NATO's most militant vanguard.
  8. +2
    3 August 2021 13: 28
    Serbia is a NATO member

    The authors of VO are as always on top laughing
  9. -1
    3 August 2021 13: 42
    Yes, they signed some harmful agreements with NATO, but that would be a NATO member IS FAR OR BETTER EVER !!! 
    In addition, if something happens, God forbid war that NAOO would pass through Serbia under these agreements and that they would have "diplomatic status". 
    1. -1
      3 August 2021 13: 48
      As for Kosovo and the recognition by Israel, and this is: "nothing personal, just business", but Serbs do not have such wisdom. ! wink
  10. 0
    3 August 2021 15: 06
    "...And although Serbia is a member of NATO[/ i] .... "
    ======
    Did I oversleep something? Since when did Serbia become a "NATO member" ??? belay Or, after all, the authors of the article are a little "[i] not on friendly terms with their heads."???
    request
    1. -1
      3 August 2021 17: 39
      And King Milutin was a member of the Vatieana crusaders laughing , or so that when trying to rob the LIGHT MOUNTAIN ATOS CRUSHED THE WEIGHT OF FRAENCO CROSS-CARRIERS ARMY AND SO THEREFORE THEY WENT FROM ITALY TO YERUSAL !!! laughing
  11. +1
    3 August 2021 18: 26
    Well, how can you ?! After all, VO positions itself as an analytical portal of the military-patriotic direction! And the news feed is an article by an "analyst" who writes with a blue eye about Serbia's membership in NATO .. ​​Indeed, it is time to introduce disadvantages into the rating scale of articles.
  12. 0
    4 August 2021 02: 49
    Several states will withdraw their recognition of Kosovo. We are talking about African and Middle Eastern countries.
    This was stated by the Serbian newspaper Politika, referring to the analyst of the Center for Social Stability of Serbia Predrag Rajic.
    In order not to incur the wrath and pressure of Washington on these states, it was decided not to name them. But, judging by the region where they are located, it can be assumed that countries are meant in which the majority of the population is Muslim.


    I correctly understood that the United States receives information exclusively from the Serbian newspaper Politika and without it they will not know who will withdraw the confession?

    Serbia hopes for support from Moscow and Beijing, which consistently advocate the preservation of its territorial integrity, in contrast to most Western countries advocating the "independence" of Kosovo and Metohija


    Well, the United States and Europe are in favor of preserving the territorial integrity of Georgia (Abkhazia and South Ossetia), Moldova (Transnistria), Ukraine (Crimea and Donbass), while Russia opposes.

    The question of who is "more correct" in favor of preserving territorial integrity can be solved simply: just remember the names of the world's major currencies and the countries to which they belong.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"