Afghan Air Force: Development or Agony?

56

On February 29, 2020, in the capital of Qatar, a peace agreement was signed between the United States and the Taliban (banned in the Russian Federation). The key provisions of this agreement are the following points:

- The US must refrain from using force;



- The Taliban are obliged to fold weapon and stop terrorist and military activities;

- The withdrawal of US troops and their NATO allies from Afghanistan will begin within 14 months after the signing of the document (subject to the terms of the treaty by the Taliban);

- The Afghan government should begin negotiations with the UN Security Council to remove Taliban members from the sanctions list by May 29, Washington intends to exclude the group from its list of sanctions by August 27;

- The United States will reduce troops in Afghanistan to 8,6 thousand within 135 days, depending on the fulfillment of the Taliban's obligations under the agreement. In return, the Taliban should abandon the use of Afghan territory for attack;

- The United States of America undertakes not to interfere in the internal politics of the country;

- Annually, the US will provide funds for training, consulting and equipping the Afghan security forces;

- The Afghan government will release up to 5 Taliban prisoners as a sign of goodwill in exchange for 1 security personnel held by the Taliban.

The ultimate goal of the agreement between the conflicting parties is the subsequent integration of the Taliban into the political life of Afghanistan. However, this provided for the Taliban leaders to revise their key ideological approaches and attitudes, for which, as subsequent events showed, they were not ready.

On the contrary, instead of complying with the terms of the treaty in May 2021 in connection with the withdrawal of foreign military contingent from Afghanistan, the Taliban militants launched a large-scale offensive across the country. By mid-July, the Islamists managed to establish control over 80% of the territory of Afghanistan. These are mainly rural areas, large cities and military bases are mainly still under the control of the central government, which, using armored vehicles, artillery and Aviationtrying to restore the situation.

In turn, the United States, in parallel with the withdrawal of troops, provides air support to the Afghan security forces. The air strikes were carried out at the request of the Afghan government forces, as well as to destroy heavy weapons and equipment that fell into the hands of the Taliban.

Thanks to American air support in a number of areas, it was possible to stop the militants' offensive, or even push them back to their former positions. Thus, the situation that developed after the withdrawal of the Soviet "limited contingent" in 1989 is largely repeated. Until a certain moment, the government of the Republic of Afghanistan, thanks to large-scale Soviet military and economic support, managed to restrain the onslaught of the Mujahideen and maintain control over the situation in the country. However, after the collapse of the USSR, military assistance completely stopped, and in the spring of 1992 the government of the Republic of Afghanistan fell.

There is reason to believe that the United States will try to prevent the fall of Kabul, and by the end of the year a precarious balance will be established in Afghanistan, when neither side will be able to achieve an unconditional military victory. Thanks to the qualitative superiority in armaments, material and air support of the United States and its allies, the central government will be able to hold large administrative and political centers and control traffic along the main transport arteries during daylight hours. The Taliban will be in control of the countryside and roads at night.

However, there can be no talk of the unconditional establishment of control over the road network by the militants at night. In addition to the stationary well-fortified checkpoints of the Afghan army, reinforced with armored vehicles, unmanned and manned combat and reconnaissance aircraft will operate against the Taliban.

It is clear that without American support, the Afghan security forces will not be able to hold out for long, but the Afghan Air Force, created thanks to the efforts of the United States, must play a significant role in deterring Islamic militants.

$ 7 billion is spent annually on the maintenance of the Afghan security forces, which significantly exceeds the capabilities of the Afghan economy. At the same time, the country's GDP is no more than 25 billion. In the current situation, the United States is forced to allocate significant financial resources intended for the purchase of equipment and weapons for the Afghan security forces, training of personnel and provision of material and technical supplies.

Helicopters of Soviet and Russian production in the National Air Corps of Afghanistan


Soon after the start of Operation Enduring Freedom by the armed forces of the United States and its allies (October 2001), it became clear that the foreign contingent would not be able to control the situation in the long term. The Americans spent about $ 600 billion on the fight against the Taliban, but they did not manage to unconditionally defeat the radical Islamists. In July 2011, the gradual withdrawal of the international coalition troops from Afghanistan began. Two years later, ensuring security in the country was formally entrusted to the local power structures, after which the foreign military contingent began to play a supporting role. But it was clear to everyone that the government in Kabul could not do without foreign military and financial support. The main sponsor of the Afghan security forces all this time was the United States.

One of the main tools at the disposal of the central government for armed struggle against Islamic militants is the Afghan National Air Corps (Air Force).

Afghan Air Force: Development or Agony?

At the first stage of the anti-terrorist campaign in Afghanistan, a stake was made on aircraft that are well known to Afghans. Relying on American technical and financial support, the Northern Alliance forces managed to return to service several Soviet-made helicopters hijacked to Pakistan. Some more Mi-25 / Mi-35 and Mi-8 / Mi-17 were supplied by Russia, and transferred by the Eastern European countries to NATO.

Until a certain point, Soviet and Russian-made helicopters were the main striking force of the National Air Corps. Pilots of Afghan combat helicopters mainly used 57-80-mm NAR S-5 and S-8. Small arms and cannon weapons were used extremely rarely against the militants, since this implied rapprochement with a target at a distance, when there was a high probability of being hit by return fire from small arms.


The military transport Mi-8 and Mi-17 transported cargo and personnel of the Afghan security forces, but NAR blocks and bombs were often hung on them, and the presence of a 7,62-mm PK machine gun in the doorway was mandatory.

Along with the exploitation of used Soviet-built aircraft, the United States purchased new helicopters from Russia as part of the campaign against global terror. So, as of 2013, our country delivered 63 Mi-17V-5 helicopters (export version of the Mi-8MTV-5), as well as consumables and spare parts with a total value of about $ 1 billion. After 2014, the Americans stopped purchasing equipment for the Afghan army and weapons in Russia. Nevertheless, several more used Mi-17s came from Eastern Europe. The Afghan government, faced with a shortage of spare parts and a shortage of combat helicopters, has asked for grants. Russia did not begin to carry out free deliveries to a country whose leadership is controlled by the Americans. India handed over four well-worn Mi-35 helicopters to Afghanistan in 2018, but this did not have a noticeable effect on the situation.

At the moment, the Afghan Air Force still has flying attack Mi-35s and transport-combat Mi-17s. However, due to the severance of cooperation with Moscow, their technical condition leaves much to be desired, and they are more idle on the ground. If the situation does not change, then in the near future the Afghan military will have to finally part with Russian aircraft.

Objectives of the program to replace Russian-made helicopters in the Afghan Air Corps


Even before the introduction of sanctions against Russia, the United States began implementing a program to replace Russian helicopters in Afghanistan with aircraft that meet NATO standards. The main goals of this program were to reduce Russia's influence on the situation in the region, to reduce financial costs for the purchase and maintenance of aircraft, to optimize the time for preparing for repeated combat missions and to make them more effective.

From the beginning, the US military had clear priorities. When choosing equipment for the Afghan Air Force, it was only about the implementation of bomb and assault strikes, the airlifting of small units and cargo transportation in the interests of the ground forces. The acquisition of jet combat aircraft capable of intercepting air defense missions and conducting aerial combat was not considered.

Replacement of Mi-8 / Mi-17 with American-made helicopters


At the first stage, the United States tried to compensate for the shortage of Mi-8 / Mi-17 multipurpose helicopters taken from the long-term storage of Bell UH-1H Iroquois. Although these veterans of the Vietnam War underwent a major overhaul and were equipped with new means of communication, they no longer meet modern requirements, and did not show themselves in the best way in the highlands.


Helicopter UH-1H Iroquois

The main alternative to Russian transport and combat helicopters in the long term should be the upgraded Sikorsky UH-60A Black Hawk, taken from storage.


Helicopter UH-60A + Black Hawk of the Afghan Air Corps

Helicopters, built in the mid-1980s, underwent major overhaul and modernization, after which they received the designation UH-60A +. During the modernization, General Electric T700-GE-701C engines, improved transmission and an updated control system are installed. It is stated that the capabilities of the UH-60A + correspond to the modern modification of the UH-60L. In total, the United States plans to deliver 159 multipurpose helicopters.


The UH-60A + helicopters are equipped with 7,62 mm machine guns, and, if necessary, can carry unguided rockets and containers with six-barreled 12,7 mm GAU-19 machine gun mounts on external suspensions.

It is fair to say that the Black Hawk Down is a very good helicopter. However, Afghan pilots and ground technicians are not very enthusiastic about the transition to the UH-60A +. This is due to the fact that the Black Hawk Down, with all its merits, is a much more demanding machine to service than the Mi-8 / Mi-17 helicopters mastered by the Afghans, which have proven their high efficiency and unpretentiousness. In addition, the US-supplied transport and combat helicopters are not new, which will inevitably affect operational reliability.

Replacement of the Mi-35 with light reconnaissance and attack helicopters and turboprop attack aircraft


In the past, the main striking force of the Afghan Air Force was Mi-35 helicopters. This vehicle is an export version of the Mi-24V and is armed with a USPU-24 movable machine gun with a four-barreled 12,7 mm YakB-12,7 machine gun. The standard combat load of the Afghan Mi-35 was 2-4 B-8V20A blocks with a capacity of twenty 80-mm S-8 missiles.


Usually Afghan Mi-35s were used as "flying MLRS". Trying not to be exposed to anti-aircraft fire from the ground, the crews carried out a salvo launch of the NAR "over the area" from a distance of at least 1 km.

In 2015, American representatives announced that, due to the high cost and non-obvious efficiency, they were stopping funding for technical support for the Mi-35. Nevertheless, the Afghans did not completely abandon the "crocodiles", but their combat readiness dropped sharply and the intensity of flights dropped dramatically. Currently, the Afghan National Air Corps has no more than eight Mi-35s capable of taking off.

To some extent, the light MD Helicopters MD530F Cayuse Warrior has become a replacement for the Russian attack helicopters, which is a member of a family descending from the single-engine light multipurpose McDonnell Douglas Model 500 helicopter. The Afghan Air Corps has about 30 MD530Fs. In total, the fleet of light combat helicopters is planned to be increased to 68 units.


Helicopter MD530F Cayuse Warrior Cayuse Warrior of the Afghan Air Corps

The helicopters of the MD530F modification, intended for the Afghan Air Force, are equipped with a Rolls-Royce Allison 250-C30 Turboshaft gas turbine engine with a takeoff power of 650 hp. and a propeller with increased lift. This allows it to operate effectively at higher temperatures and in mountainous terrain, surpassing other helicopters in its class. The MD-530F can carry a wide range of weapons, including HMP400 containers with a 12,7 mm MZ machine gun (rate of fire 1100 rounds per minute, 400 rounds of ammunition), as well as NAR and ATGM launchers. The payload weight on the external sling is up to 970 kg.

The MD530F light combat helicopter became the first in the family to receive a "glass cockpit" that includes the GDU 700P PFD / MFD touchscreen displays and the Garmin GTN 650 NAV / COM / GPS, as well as an integrated tracking system (HDTS) that integrates sighting and search equipment, FLIR night vision equipment and a laser rangefinder-designator.

In addition to striking ground targets, the MD530F is capable of patrolling and reconnaissance, as well as adjusting artillery fire and directing other attack helicopters and aircraft to the target. The presence of a laser rangefinder-designator on board makes it possible to illuminate the target for guided artillery shells and aviation ammunition.

Although the MD530F cannot be compared to the Mi-35 in terms of combat survivability, it is quite effective when used correctly. The key to the invulnerability of this helicopter is its high maneuverability, thrust-to-weight ratio and small geometrical dimensions. Due to its much lower take-off weight, the MD530F is more sensitive to control commands and surpasses the Mi-35 in operational overload. The MD530F is much more difficult to hit than the armored crocodile. In addition, a number of the most vulnerable components of the MD530F are covered with polymer-ceramic armor, and the fuel tanks are sealed and can withstand hits from 12,7 mm bullets. The main rotor with increased efficiency remains operational when fired by 14,5 mm bullets.


The combat survivability of the MD530F is negatively affected by the presence of one engine, the failure of which will inevitably lead to a fall or to an emergency landing. At the same time, it should be recognized that, although the Mi-24 family machines are better protected from small arms fire, large-caliber 12,7-14,5-mm bullets pose a huge threat to all helicopters and aircraft available in the National Air Corps without exception. Afghanistan.


An important factor in the adoption of MD530F light combat helicopters was their relatively low price. The Russian Helicopters holding in 2014 offered an export modification of the Mi-35M for $ 10 million, while the cost of one MD530F without weapons is $ 1,4 million. In addition, fuel efficiency is of great importance. Two Mi-35 engines consume an average of 770 liters of fuel per hour. The gas turbine engine installed on the MD530F consumes 90 liters per hour. Taking into account the fact that aviation fuel is delivered to Afghan air bases by military transport aircraft or road convoys, for which it is necessary to provide strong guards, this significantly affects the intensity of the use of combat aircraft and the cost of a flight hour.

The leadership of the American defense department categorically objected to the supply of not only modern AH-64E Apache Guardian combat helicopters to Afghanistan, but also the relatively simple AH-1Z Viper. This is mainly due to fears that the attack helicopters used by the US armed forces may be at the disposal of Chinese or Russian specialists. Also, great doubts were caused by the ability of the Afghans to independently maintain very complex and time-consuming combat helicopters in working order. In addition, it was highly desirable to reduce the cost of a flight hour and the preparation time for a repeated combat mission.

According to the plan of the American military, the Embraer A-35B Super Tucano turboprop attack aircraft, which won the competition for a light combat aircraft in 29, should become a full-fledged replacement for the Mi-2011. The rival of the American-Brazilian turboprop attack aircraft was the Hawker Beechcraft AT-6B Texan II. The victory in the competition was facilitated by the fact that Embraer, together with Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC), began assembling the Super Tucano in the United States.


Satellite image of Google Earth: A-29B aircraft near the SNC hangar in Jacksonville

As of 2016, the cost of one Super Tucano was $ 16 million. The price of one A-29B aircraft assembled at the Jacksonville plant in Florida in 2019 is more than $ 18 million. compared with the Brazilian "Super Tucano", mainly associated with the installation of more advanced American-made avionics.

The Super Tucano, which has been in service since 2004, is also chosen because it has performed very well in counterinsurgency operations conducted by the governments of Brazil and Colombia. This armed turboprop aircraft has been successful in intercepting light passenger transport aircraft carrying illegal cargo.

To date, two hundred Super Tucanos used in the war zone have flown over 24 hours. Due to their high maneuverability, low thermal signature and good survivability, the aircraft proved to be excellent in the course of combat missions. Although there were flight accidents, not a single turboprop attack aircraft was lost to anti-aircraft fire.


Light turboprop attack aircraft A-29B Super Tucano of the Afghan Air Corps

All expenses associated with the purchase of aircraft, their delivery to Afghanistan, the purchase of weapons, spare parts and consumables for them, as well as the training of pilots and mechanics, were borne by the United States. Afghan flight and technical personnel were trained by instructors from the US Air Force 81st Fighter Squadron at Moody Air Force Base in Georgia.

Compared to the single-seat modification A-29A, the two-seat A-29B aircraft used by the Afghan Air Force are equipped with much more advanced avionics. Due to the presence of a second crew member, performing the duties of the weapons operator and observer pilot, this aircraft is optimal for use in operations where armed reconnaissance is carried out and the use of guided weapons is possible.

Thanks to the 6 hp Pratt & Whitney Canada PT68 A-1600C turboprop engine, the Super Tucano has a fairly high flight performance. The maximum speed in level flight is 590 km / h. Cruising speed - 508 km / h. A-29V can stay in the air for more than 8 hours. Ferry flight range - 2500 km. Combat radius with a load of 1500 kg - 550 km. Normal takeoff weight is 2890 kg, and maximum - 3210 kg. The turboprop attack aircraft is capable of operating in high temperature conditions, has good take-off and landing characteristics, which makes it possible to be based on unpaved runways limited in length.

The crew has at their disposal the means of displaying information from the Israeli company Elbit Systems and sighting and search systems manufactured by Boeing Defense, Space & Security. When guided munitions are aimed at the target, the data display system on the pilot's helmet is activated, which is integrated with the control equipment for aviation weapons. It is reported that in 2013 for the A-29B company OrbiSat created a suspended radar capable of working on air and ground targets and detecting single mortar positions with a high probability. There are also inertial and satellite navigation systems and equipment on board that provide a closed radio communication channel.

Combat load, or suspended containers with reconnaissance and search equipment with a total weight of up to 1550 kg are placed on five hardpoints. The A-29B armament includes free-fall and corrected bombs, cluster bombs, NAR, as well as 70-mm HYDRA 70 / APKWS laser-guided rockets. The wing contains two 12,7 mm FN Herstal M3P machine guns with a rate of fire of 1100 rounds per minute. Ammunition - 200 rounds per barrel. There is also a suspension for a 20 mm GIAT M20A1 cannon and four containers with 7,62-12,7 mm machine guns.


If necessary, an additional fuel tank with a capacity of 400 liters, which can be sealed and filled with neutral gas, can be installed at the co-pilot's seat.

Due to its design features, the combat survivability of the A-29V is higher than that of most combat helicopters. On a turboprop attack aircraft, unlike a helicopter, there are not many vulnerable nodes, if damaged, a controlled flight is impossible. The visibility of the A-29V in the IR spectrum is significantly lower than that of combat helicopters, and the horizontal flight speed is approximately two times greater, which reduces the time spent in the anti-aircraft fire zone. To counter heat-guided missiles and jamming radar, there are automatic devices for shooting heat traps and dipole reflectors. It is possible to suspend a container with laser equipment for countering missiles with IR seeker. However, the Taliban now do not have operational MANPADS. For shooting at aerial targets, militants mainly use small arms, they also have 12,7 and 14,5 mm anti-aircraft guns.

Taking into account the existing threats, the cockpit and the most important parts of the Afghan A-29Bs are covered with polymer armor, not penetrable by armor-piercing rifle bullets fired from a distance of 300 m. Fuel tanks are protected from lumbago and are filled with neutral gas. With strong anti-aircraft resistance, the booking of a two-seater cabin can be reinforced with ceramic plates, which provides protection against 12,7-mm bullets at a distance of 500 m. But in this case, the mass of the combat load is reduced by 200 kg and the flight range is reduced.

The Afghans began mastering the first eight A-29Bs in 2016. In 2020, the Afghan Air Force already had 26 aircraft. It is expected that in the near future the fleet of Afghan "Super Tucano" will exceed 30 units. Afghan A-29B pilots made their first combat missions in early 2017. After the arrival of new aircraft and their development by the crews and ground services, the intensity of combat missions increased. As early as April 2017, Super Tucano flew up to 40 sorties a week.


According to the recommendations issued by American advisers, Afghan pilots avoided entering the effective anti-aircraft fire zone by launching rockets and dropping bombs from a safe height. Wing 12,7-mm machine guns were not used against the Taliban.


To improve the effectiveness of combat missions, in March 2018, GBU-58 Paveway II corrected bombs began to be suspended on the Afghan Super Tucano. This not only dramatically improved the accuracy of bombing, but also made it possible to destroy stationary targets with known coordinates at night.


In general, the Super Tucano performed very well during the hostilities in Afghanistan, and, according to Western experts, were able to compensate for the decommissioning of the Mi-35 helicopters. Although the price of the A-29V is slightly higher than that of the exported Mi-35, turboprop attack aircraft compensate for it with much lower operating costs. The cost of a flight hour for Afghan A-29Bs in 2016 was approximately $ 600. At the same time, the cost of a flight hour of the Mi-17V-5 transport and combat helicopter exceeded $ 1000, while for the Mi-35 it was close to $ 2000. The time it takes to prepare a helicopter for a second combat mission is much longer than that of the Super Tucano. With a similar or even higher combat effectiveness, light turboprop combat aircraft in Afghanistan turned out to be economically more profitable.


Afghan A-29B with a GBU-58 Paveway II bomb is preparing to make a combat mission at night

A great advantage of the A-29V is its ability to operate successfully in the dark, which is extremely problematic for the Afghan Mi-17V-5 and Mi-35. Unlike combat helicopters, a turboprop aircraft easily overcomes mountain ranges, while carrying a maximum combat load.

Transport-passenger and reconnaissance-strike aircraft of the National Air Corps of Afghanistan


Before the fall of Mohammad Najibullah's regime, the Afghan Air Force operated passenger transport aircraft: An-2, Il-14, An-26, An-32. After the Taliban fighters left Kabul without a fight in November 2001, all the aircraft received from the USSR were in a state of scrap metal, and the Western coalition had to rebuild the Afghan military transport aircraft.

At the end of 2009, two medium military transport C-27A Spartans were handed over to the newly formed Afghan Air Force. "Spartan", which uses the nodes of the American C-130, was created by Alenia Aeronautica on the basis of the Italian G.222 aircraft.

Alenia North America has been awarded a $ 485 million contract for the modernization and refurbishment of 18 C-27A. The Afghan aircraft are equipped with ballistic protection of the cockpit, a device for shooting heat traps and additional equipment for operations from poorly prepared airfields. The fuel tanks are filled with neutral gas.


Military transport C-27A of the Afghan National Air Corps

The S-27A with a maximum takeoff weight of 31800 kg has a payload of up to 11600 kg. Capacity: 60 passengers or 46 armed paratroopers. Flight range with a payload of 4535 kg - 5110 km. Service ceiling - 9140 m. Maximum speed - 602 km / h. Cruising - 583 km / h.

A total of 16 "Spartans" were delivered to Afghanistan. However, in January 2013, the United States decided not to allocate funds to maintain the C-27A fleet in working order. This is reported to be associated with excessive operating costs. According to some sources, as of 2020, the National Air Corps had four C-27As in working order, according to other sources, all Afghan Spartans were decommissioned.

Since 2013, four used American C-130H Hercules have been used to carry out transport and passenger transportation in the interests of the armed forces of Afghanistan.


Afghan S-130N

In May 2008, the United States purchased four Ukrainian An-32Bs, previously in service, for the Afghan Air Force. Apparently, the An-32B have already been written off due to the depletion of the resource.

Due to the fact that the service of the C-27A aircraft in Afghanistan did not work out, plans to equip the Afghan Air Force with AC-27J Stinger II "gunships" were not implemented. In 2008, the Special Operations Command allocated $ 32 million for this purpose. In the period from 2011 to 2015, it was planned to purchase 16 AC-27Js. The aircraft was supposed to be armed with a 30 or 40 mm cannon installed in the doorway, as well as high-precision aviation ammunition.

In 2008, the C-27A taken from storage arrived at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, where it was supposed to be refitted at the US Air Force Research Laboratory. However, at the beginning of 2010, the work was stopped.

In July 2012, the Italian company Alenia Aermacchi and the American company ATK announced their intention to create a multi-purpose MC-27J aircraft on the basis of the military transport C-27J. Depending on the mission, this vehicle, as part of anti-insurgency operations, can provide fire support to ground units, conduct reconnaissance and patrolling, transport cargo and personnel.


In 2014, the first MC-27J began testing. The basis of the sighting and reconnaissance complex was the L-3 Wescam MX-15Di platform with optoelectronic and infrared equipment. Information exchange with ground command posts is carried out via the Link-16 communication line.

As part of the concept of creating a low-cost multipurpose aircraft with quick-detachable armament, the aircraft was equipped with a 30-mm GAU-23 automatic cannon (aircraft modification ATK Mk. 44 Bushmaster).


A cannon with an ammunition supply system is placed on a standard cargo pallet and mounted in the cargo compartment for firing through the cargo door. Mounting or dismantling the gun should take no more than four hours. In addition to the 30-mm gun mount, it is planned to introduce AGM-27 Griffin and AGM-176 Hellfire missiles into the MC-114J armament.

In 2017, the MC-27J was offered to the Special Operations Forces Command, which is actually responsible for equipping the Afghan Air Force with aviation equipment. However, the decision on the supply of MC-27J has not yet been made.

Six general-purpose aircraft Cessna 208 Caravan are used to deliver small cargo, including to unpaved runways.


Afghanistan National Air Corps Cessna 208 aircraft

This aircraft, due to its unpretentiousness, low operating costs and the ability to operate from unprepared sites, is popular in third world countries. In the United States Air Force, it is known as the U-27A.


Aircraft with one 675 hp turboprop engine. has a maximum takeoff weight of 3629 kg, and can carry 9 passengers at a cruising speed of 344 km / h. The maximum speed is 352 km / h. Flight range - 1980 km.

The first Cessna 208s appeared in the Afghan Air Force in 2011. According to reference data, the National Air Corps also operates 10 reconnaissance and strike AC-208 Combat Caravan - with sighting and search equipment and AGM-114 Hellfire missiles. However, it was not possible to confirm the presence of these aircraft in Afghanistan; the network only contains photographs of unarmed Afghan aircraft. Perhaps we are talking about a modification of the MC-208 Guardian Caravan, used by the American special operations forces.

The Afghan Air Force also has Pilatus PC-12NG turboprop business jets. The aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of 4740 kg is equipped with a 1200 hp turboprop engine. The maximum flight speed is 540 km / h. Cruising speed - 502 km / h. The flight range with one passenger on board is 3530 km. Range with one pilot and 10 passengers - 2371 km.

It is known that in 2012 the American company Sierra Nevada received a contract worth $ 220 million for the refurbishment of 18 PC-12NG aircraft purchased in Switzerland. Aviation experts believe the Afghan PC-12NGs should be retrofitted into surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft.


American reconnaissance aircraft U-28A

Since 2006, three US Air Force MTR squadrons have operated U-28A Draco aircraft (military version PC-12NG). Modification U-28A HB-FOB - designed for optoelectronic reconnaissance and patrolling at any time of the day. U-28A HB-FOG - designed to determine coordinates and intercept messages in the radio range from 30 MHz to 2 GHz. Reconnaissance aircraft U-28A HB-FOG and U-28A HB-FOB visually differ from passenger aircraft with wired windows, antennas for communication and radio systems, additional containers in the lower part of the fuselage and sensors of the optoelectronic system.

There is reason to believe that the Americans are trying to compensate for the absence of reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles in the Afghan Air Force with special aircraft based on the PC-12NG.

State and prospects of the National Air Corps of Afghanistan


In general, the National Air Corps of Afghanistan is equipped with sufficiently modern aviation equipment, and in terms of its size it is quite consistent with the size of the country. According to Western data, the combat readiness of Afghan aircraft and helicopters averages about 70% of the total. Most of the pilots now flying Western aircraft have been trained outside of Afghanistan. Ground technical personnel were mainly trained on-site by foreign military instructors and civilian contractors.

In general, the level of training of the Afghan flight and technical personnel is assessed as good. However, even with the necessary qualifications, the pilots of the Afghan Air Force do not always have a sufficient level of motivation and are sometimes overly cautious. Cases of formal fulfillment of a flight mission have been repeatedly noted. When there was a risk of running into anti-aircraft fire from the ground, Afghan pilots did not drop bombs aimingly, but the NAR was launched from a maximum distance. Technical ground personnel involved in the preparation of aircraft and helicopters for departures, as well as in their repair, requires close supervision by foreign specialists. Otherwise, Afghans may deviate from the requirements of instructions, perform repairs and maintenance work negligently, which, in turn, is fraught with a high risk of flight accidents.

Taking into account the number, the level of training of personnel and the state of the aircraft fleet, aircraft and helicopters of the Afghan Air Force can perform 50-60 sorties per day. This, of course, is possible provided that there is a sufficient amount of aviation fuel and ammunition at the air bases, as well as with timely maintenance and repairs. The logistics of the Afghan National Air Corps are entirely dependent on US-controlled supplies, and the quality of maintenance is dependent on the presence of foreign instructors overseeing the Afghan mechanics. In light of recent events, against the background of active operations carried out by the Taliban in many regions of the country, the combat power of the Afghan Air Force may not be enough to restrain their offensive impulse.

According to American plans, by 2022, the Afghan Air Force fleet was supposed to increase to 245 aircraft and helicopters. However, there are great doubts that this will be implemented. One way or another, if the United States is interested in preserving the current government in Kabul, it will have to allocate very large resources to maintain its viability. A number of military experts believe that the pro-American regime in Afghanistan will not hold out without direct large-scale participation in the hostilities of the US military aviation, which the Joseph Biden administration is trying to avoid.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    3 August 2021 05: 13
    Sergey, good day !!! How long has been an article with a full review of the Afghan air force of the new model (as I myself call them "lightweight" due to the transition to a type with a lower takeoff weight). Upon reading, I formulated one thesis about the opposition of attack helicopters and light turboprop aircraft and light and heavy attack helicopters, so acute for me. Thank you, it's a pleasure to read and return to old topics, looking at them from a new angle.
  2. +8
    3 August 2021 05: 31
    On the contrary, instead of complying with the terms of the treaty in May 2021 in connection with the withdrawal of foreign military contingent from Afghanistan, the Taliban militants launched a large-scale offensive across the country.
    With their promises they simply pretended to be lambs, although it was immediately obvious that these were wolves in sheep's clothing!
    Not worthy of the Taliban (forbidden) civilized communication and political negotiations! You can only talk to them from a position of strength! And when will they start to bleat that "we are for what"? Poke your face into peace treaties! And poke it so that it would go out of the nose!
    1. -7
      3 August 2021 05: 52
      I think that our diplomats divide by 100 all the promises of the Taliban!
      1. 0
        4 August 2021 19: 07
        Quote: ASAD
        I think that our diplomats divide by 100 all the promises of the Taliban!

        It is more important to calculate that the planes and helicopters used against the Taliban cannot be used against Russia.
    2. +13
      3 August 2021 06: 41
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Not worthy of the Taliban (forbidden) civilized communication and political negotiations!

      Your position is contrary to the "party line".
      1. 0
        3 August 2021 06: 58
        I cannot openly speak out "against the party line", but no one will bother me to express my opinion in a veiled way))) smile
      2. +4
        3 August 2021 07: 58
        Quote: Tucan
        contradicts the "party line".

        Line by line, but joint exercises with Uzbeks and Tajiks were held.
        1. +5
          3 August 2021 08: 08
          Quote: Jacket in stock
          Line by line, but joint exercises with Uzbeks and Tajiks were held.

          I will not say for Uzbekistan, but Tajikistan, without the Russian army, is an easy prey for the Taliban.
      3. +2
        3 August 2021 08: 08
        Quote: Tucan
        Your position is contrary to the "party line".

        Well, in fairness, the "party line" has already made another "zigzag" after the published atrocities. All the same, we have not yet completely "sank".
        1. +8
          3 August 2021 10: 03
          Quote: KKND
          Well, in fairness, the "party line" has already made another "zigzag" after the published atrocities. All the same, we have not yet completely "sank".

          Hi!
          Have the atrocities committed by the Taliban before their overthrow in 2001 already been forgotten? Or do you mean that those who are here, those who make decisions, did not know who they were meeting?
          1. +3
            3 August 2021 10: 37
            Quote: Bongo
            Hi!
            Have the atrocities committed by the Taliban before their overthrow in 2001 already been forgotten? Or do you mean that those who are here, those who make decisions, did not know who they were meeting?

            Hi!
            The whole joke is that we had personal accounts with the Taliban for their material and financial assistance to the Chechen bandits. That is why we have banned this movement.
            But the Americans also knew about the atrocities of the Taliban and their ties with Osama bin Laden, but they also had to negotiate with them and thereby partially recognize their legitimacy. Here, as in one saying: "I like it, I don't like it, sleep my beauty." It seems that no one wants to fight with these scumbags, they are trying to get by with "little blood".
          2. -2
            4 August 2021 23: 48
            Quote: Bongo
            Have the atrocities committed by the Taliban before their overthrow in 2001 already been forgotten?
            It cannot be said about the modern Taliban that they are too brutal and create too many problems for civilians in the territories they have occupied. In terms of bloodlust and vindictiveness, they greatly fall short of the Zelensky, Poroshenkov, Kolomoisky and their patrons from the State Department and the CIA. That is, one cannot say about the Taliban that they have not learned anything. For example, the Taliban seek to negotiate with civil servants, police and military officials for the state and who receive salaries from the state. Any civil servant can apply to the local Taliban commandant's office with a statement that he serves the state out of patriotic feelings and for earning money, and his work for the state is not directed against the Taliban and leads to negative consequences for the Taliban, for example, he only guards the border crossing, catches criminals, checks documents and issues passports. In this case, the Taliban issue him a security certificate, the owner of which can move through the territory controlled by the Taliban without fear for his life, health and safety. Afghan security forces fighting the opposition, in turn, are outraged that among the killed Taliban they often meet immigrants from Russia and the CIS, who were not destroyed in time by Russian law enforcement officers and now continue their activities in Afghanistan. If the United States really wants to help the Afghan government forces, then the most effective help will be the total execution of the punitive Crimean Tatar and Chechen households in Ukraine ...
          3. +2
            5 August 2021 08: 08
            hi

            Did the experts take into account that the salary level in the USA is higher?
            1. +2
              6 August 2021 01: 36
              Quote: Mister X
              Did the experts take into account that the salary level in the USA is higher?

              Hey! Taking into account the fact that in Jacksonville, in fact, a screwdriver assembly of aircraft from supplied vehicle kits is being carried out, the increase in price by more than 2 million is mainly due not to this. Afghan "Super Tucano" in comparison with the Brazilian is really equipped with more advanced avionics.
    3. 0
      3 August 2021 07: 48
      In the East, there has never been an obligation to firmly and honestly adhere to the terms of the contract! Self-interest and baksheesh are always held in high esteem! And the contract is words ...
  3. +1
    3 August 2021 06: 08
    The Afghan Air Force has acquired a "second wind".
    After which the "artificial" can come.
    1. +8
      3 August 2021 06: 36
      Quote: knn54
      The Afghan Air Force has acquired a "second wind".
      After which the "artificial" can come.

      Until 1991, the combat capability of the Afghan Air Force was completely dependent on the USSR, and now on the United States. Nothing changed
      1. +3
        3 August 2021 16: 25
        By the way, what are the airfields there now? Well, Kabul, Kandahar - it is understandable that although they are international, they are also used for dual purposes. But purely military takeoffs - how many are there?
  4. +5
    3 August 2021 08: 06
    There is reason to believe that the United States will try to prevent the fall of Kabul, and by the end of the year a precarious balance will be established in Afghanistan, when neither side will be able to achieve an unconditional military victory.

    Sergei! Are you a Heretic ?! lol Here, from every iron, including the Internet, it is broadcast that the government in Kabul will fall no later than 6 months later, and you gave such a forecast.
    In comparison with the MD530F and the Mi-24 family, despite the many advantages of the first, it carries less armament.
    A number of military experts believe that the pro-American regime in Afghanistan will not hold out without direct large-scale participation in the hostilities of the US military aviation.

    All the "experts" in the media have already "buried" the current regime in Kabul anyway.
    1. +3
      3 August 2021 09: 05
      Quote: KKND
      There is reason to believe that the United States will try to prevent the fall of Kabul, and by the end of the year a precarious balance will be established in Afghanistan, when neither side will be able to achieve an unconditional military victory.

      Sergei! Are you a Heretic ?! lol Here, from every iron, including the Internet, it is broadcast that the government in Kabul will fall no later than 6 months later, and you gave such a forecast.
      In comparison with the MD530F and the Mi-24 family, despite the many advantages of the first, it carries less armament.
      A number of military experts believe that the pro-American regime in Afghanistan will not hold out without direct large-scale participation in the hostilities of the US military aviation.

      All the "experts" in the media have already "buried" the current regime in Kabul anyway.

      I think that the guys from ANA will spoil the Taliban's blood a lot, and as for the "funeral" in the media - the usual knocking out money from the budget and creating the necessary information field ... and in general, irons often broadcast heresy - until Ukraine seems to have collapsed NATO, and with import substitution, we are not very good, and… .and… .and….
      1. +2
        3 August 2021 21: 36
        Quote: parma
        Quote: KKND
        There is reason to believe that the United States will try to prevent the fall of Kabul, and by the end of the year a precarious balance will be established in Afghanistan, when neither side will be able to achieve an unconditional military victory.

        Sergei! Are you a Heretic ?! lol Here, from every iron, including the Internet, it is broadcast that the government in Kabul will fall no later than 6 months later, and you gave such a forecast.
        In comparison with the MD530F and the Mi-24 family, despite the many advantages of the first, it carries less armament.
        A number of military experts believe that the pro-American regime in Afghanistan will not hold out without direct large-scale participation in the hostilities of the US military aviation.

        All the "experts" in the media have already "buried" the current regime in Kabul anyway.

        I think that the guys from ANA will spoil the Taliban's blood a lot, and as for the "funeral" in the media - the usual knocking out money from the budget and creating the necessary information field ... and in general, irons often broadcast heresy - until Ukraine seems to have collapsed NATO, and with import substitution, we are not very good, and… .and… .and….


        Do not expect.
        The Taliban have already massacred almost everyone who worked with the Americans.
        All translators, transporters, even water carriers ...
        Cut out clean ...
        Aviation has exactly zero chances of survival ...
        They don't live in a vacuum.
        1. +2
          4 August 2021 07: 30
          Quote: SovAr238A
          Quote: parma
          Quote: KKND
          There is reason to believe that the United States will try to prevent the fall of Kabul, and by the end of the year a precarious balance will be established in Afghanistan, when neither side will be able to achieve an unconditional military victory.

          Sergei! Are you a Heretic ?! lol Here, from every iron, including the Internet, it is broadcast that the government in Kabul will fall no later than 6 months later, and you gave such a forecast.
          In comparison with the MD530F and the Mi-24 family, despite the many advantages of the first, it carries less armament.
          A number of military experts believe that the pro-American regime in Afghanistan will not hold out without direct large-scale participation in the hostilities of the US military aviation.

          All the "experts" in the media have already "buried" the current regime in Kabul anyway.

          I think that the guys from ANA will spoil the Taliban's blood a lot, and as for the "funeral" in the media - the usual knocking out money from the budget and creating the necessary information field ... and in general, irons often broadcast heresy - until Ukraine seems to have collapsed NATO, and with import substitution, we are not very good, and… .and… .and….


          Do not expect.
          The Taliban have already massacred almost everyone who worked with the Americans.
          All translators, transporters, even water carriers ...
          Cut out clean ...
          Aviation has exactly zero chances of survival ...
          They don't live in a vacuum.

          Is there any confirmation? All the information that I found boils down to the fact that the Taliban are a rod from all the cracks, and the officials, in fact, have only local special forces (the rest are not very efficient and not very reliable). But there are about 20 thousand fighters in the special forces and therefore they only constantly plug holes (the forces of the Taliban are 3-7 times larger, depending on the assessment) ... in other words, the situation is similar to Syria before our official intervention, only the Afghan army is stronger than the Syrian army of that time (yes and more support), and the Taliban have less assistance than the rebels at one time ... another of the points is that Turkey is deploying its forces in Afghanistan to replace the departed NATO soldiers!
    2. +3
      3 August 2021 09: 10
      already all the "experts" in the media have "buried" the current regime in Kabul anyway.

      If initially the Taliban did not touch ordinary fighters, and even dispersed the prisoners to their homes, now the trend has changed. Mass shootings and killings began again in the territories occupied by the Taliban. In such conditions, I think the resistance of the Afghan army will increase. No one will stop supporting the Afghan government, Yeltsin is not there to betray. Therefore, I think that the experts got excited.
    3. +6
      3 August 2021 09: 10
      Everything fell into place, the A-29V turboprop attack aircraft in the mountains is definitely more effective than the Mi-24 type helicopters, however, like any other helicopters, and it is pointless to argue with this, and the fact that it is more expensive is because it is assembled in the USA, and in general, a single-engine attack aircraft with a take-off weight of 2890 kg, anyway should be cheaper than a twin-engine Mi-35m, with a take-off weight of 10900 kg, three to four times, and it would be nice to have an analogue of the A-29B, however, like the analogue of the Cessna 208 Caravan as a replacement An-2
    4. +3
      3 August 2021 10: 11
      Quote: KKND
      Sergei! Are you a Heretic ?!

      Realist...
      Quote: KKND
      Here, from every iron, including the Internet, it is broadcast that the government in Kabul will fall no later than 6 months later, and you gave such a forecast.

      Wait and see. The Americans are interested in the Taliban showing themselves in all their glory. After that, it will be possible to declare that the decision to negotiate with them was a mistake, to place all the blame on the previous administration.
      Quote: KKND
      All the "experts" in the media have already "buried" the current regime in Kabul anyway.

      Do you believe our media?
      In my opinion, the Americans are vitally interested in preserving the current regime in Kabul. Moreover, the Taliban's crackdown on supporters of the current government and members of the Afghan security forces will only increase their motivation to resist.
      Quote: KKND
      In comparison with the MD530F and the Mi-24 family, despite the many advantages of the first, it carries less armament.

      This publication says with what combat load the Mi-35 mainly fly. If they are superior to the MD530F, they are not much better. But MD530F, on the other hand, significantly benefit from the cost of a flight hour and preparation time for departure.
      1. 0
        3 August 2021 10: 21
        The United States is acting routinely, the destruction of the state, the division of territory into 2-3 parts and the beginning of a civil war. Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan. A strategy that has worked for centuries. Only now they do not act directly.

        Divide et impera.
      2. +5
        3 August 2021 10: 35
        From my own experience in operating aviation equipment, I worked on domestic, now on foreign cars, our equipment is much less demanding on the level of training of those trains, when foreign cars, in spite of significantly lower standard hours, require strict adherence to technologies. So our calibration keys are often hammered into, and even replacing the hydraulic filter with them is impossible without it, so they pulled it over and everything got out of the fittings and a hundred percent guarantee that you will lose hydro fluid in flight, not to mention the electronic filling.
        1. +4
          3 August 2021 11: 01
          Quote: irontom
          From my own experience in operating aviation equipment, I worked on domestic, now on foreign cars, our equipment is much less demanding on the level of training of those trains, when foreign cars, in spite of significantly lower standard hours, require strict adherence to technologies.

          Could you explain which aircraft (domestic or foreign), as a result, has a bоthe greatest resource? Subject to the most qualified maintenance and the same flight operation.
          1. +5
            3 August 2021 14: 47
            He operated mainly civilian, although in his youth he studied the Su-17. An-24/26, Tu-134/154, Il-86, foreign cars A-320, Boing-737NG. The Soviet system was based on reassurance and resource hours with units.
            Accordingly, ATB (aviation technical bases), even transit ones, had to have a full staff of technicians, engineers, CD, Areo, OTK. Accordingly, it was expensive to maintain all this.
            The military TECh technical and operational units were similar, except that there were a bunch of freebies for the strength of the soldiers / mechanics. During hostilities, they passed to military regulations.
            Capitalism is cruel, there it was necessary to look for a compromise between safety and profit, from here exploitation to failure, in addition to important units, they are resource. As a result, ours in economic terms began to yield from about the 80s, later, after the collapse of the USSR, they held out on free Soviet reserves until the XNUMXs. The change, a new generation of imported aircraft, approximate in operation, did not have time to collapse the union, and then they were not allowed to develop. They took up their minds already in the XNUMXs, Supeget, the rate to the west will help us.
            Foreign brands launched the operation meeting the release of the aircraft / helicopter - "jamshut" with no education, inspection on the crew, but the technical maintenance is specially trained, while the right of the final signature is a special CRS surfing staff technician. The safety margin of safety in our equipment allows some liberty in service, the eights in the military regulations significantly increase the maintenance period, the equipment can withstand.
            1. +2
              3 August 2021 15: 20
              Quote: irontom
              The safety margin of safety in our equipment allows some liberty in service, the eights in the military regulations significantly increase the maintenance period, the equipment can withstand.

              I am interested in the question of how our designers put into our equipment a greater margin of safety and a margin for "negligence" in maintenance. After all, you have to pay for everything. It turns out that the design of our aircraft should be overweight?
              1. +2
                3 August 2021 17: 22
                For the military, economic indicators are not critical, units can be changed more often, but selling abroad forced to reduce the cost of maintenance. It is especially noticeable in helicopters, the eight went far ahead, supplies abroad demanded to adjust the car to the international level.
                In general, all these standard hours that everyone likes to measure, this is all for peacetime, in wartime it becomes critical time for service and reaction time, combat effectiveness.
                If you remember how much the United States has been pumping into Afghanistan, it’s ridiculous to read about economical standard hours.
      3. +3
        3 August 2021 10: 51
        Quote: Bongo
        Do you believe our media?

        Of course not! Even before your publication, for some reason I thought that the government in Kabul would hold out for much more than 6 months or even 2 years. I don't know why I thought that.
        Quote: Bongo
        In my opinion, the Americans are vitally interested in preserving the current regime in Kabul. Moreover, the Taliban's crackdown on supporters of the current government and members of the Afghan security forces will only increase their motivation to resist.

        I have seen private videos of American soldiers on the battlefield fighting alongside Afghan soldiers in Afghanistan. I saw how American soldiers very "nicely" send Afghan soldiers to clean up small and narrow Afghan houses, how Afghan soldiers do not want to clean these houses, since it is so easy to get a bullet point-blank there, you can clearly see how much they are afraid.
        The Americans could get tired of the Afghans' reluctance to fight. Under pain of execution by the hands of the Taliban, there will be more desire to fight.
        1. +2
          3 August 2021 14: 18
          Quote: KKND
          I have seen private videos of American soldiers on the battlefield fighting alongside Afghan soldiers in Afghanistan. I saw how American soldiers very "nicely" send Afghan soldiers to clean up small and narrow Afghan houses, how Afghan soldiers do not want to clean these houses, since it is so easy to get a bullet point-blank there, you can clearly see how much they are afraid.
          The Americans could get tired of the Afghans' reluctance to fight. Under pain of execution by the hands of the Taliban, there will be more desire to fight.

          You need to understand that the soldiers on the close have different motivations ... these are still tribal states ... take Sirte in Libya, Gaddafi's supporters really stood there to death, while the natives of many other cities went over to the side of the rebels without a fight, also in Syria, also in Iraq, also in Afghanistan (by the way, it was the same when we were there) ...
        2. +1
          3 August 2021 21: 48
          Quote: KKND
          Quote: Bongo
          Do you believe our media?

          Of course not! Even before your publication, for some reason I thought that the government in Kabul would hold out for much more than 6 months or even 2 years. I don't know why I thought that.
          Quote: Bongo
          In my opinion, the Americans are vitally interested in preserving the current regime in Kabul. Moreover, the Taliban's crackdown on supporters of the current government and members of the Afghan security forces will only increase their motivation to resist.

          I have seen private videos of American soldiers on the battlefield fighting alongside Afghan soldiers in Afghanistan. I saw how American soldiers very "nicely" send Afghan soldiers to clean up small and narrow Afghan houses, how Afghan soldiers do not want to clean these houses, since it is so easy to get a bullet point-blank there, you can clearly see how much they are afraid.
          The Americans could get tired of the Afghans' reluctance to fight. Under pain of execution by the hands of the Taliban, there will be more desire to fight.

          How long did Najibullah last?
          And with him, or rather his body, they acted much more sophisticated than with Gaddafi.
          In Kabul, Bagram and all the US bases, all the translators who collaborated with the US have already been killed, they are killing mechanics, electricians, even water carriers who worked to provide the US ..
          There really is a step for a month, no more ...
  5. 0
    3 August 2021 14: 16
    "By the end of the year, a precarious balance will be established in Afghanistan, when neither side will be able to achieve an unconditional military victory" - there is reason to believe that the author is overly optimistic.
  6. +1
    3 August 2021 15: 27
    Britain, the USSR, the USA, who is there next of the great and rich in the queue to fight-sponsor Afghanistan, China? 150 year old Santa Barbara
  7. Eug
    +1
    3 August 2021 16: 26
    Somewhere since 2012, there was talk about the upcoming repair of the Mi-8,17 helicopters of the Afghan Air Force. The figures were plus or minus 120 helicopters and about 300 TV3-117 engines. Now, it seems that this perspective can be given up, which, in my opinion, will greatly reduce the demand for Motor Sich. But its director and one of the owners, Boguslaev, received the status of General Designer for helicopters, not to mention a number of other events that simply lose their meaning without this contract ... but in general, as for me, there is a tendency towards a small number of super-complex aircraft of type 5 generation and relatively massive, much simpler types will dominate in countries with a more developed aviation industry - with further transitions to drones. Countries of the level of Afghanistan cannot see super-complicated ones, unless a super-rich ruler wants to amuse his vanity ...
  8. +3
    3 August 2021 16: 40
    According to the latest reference book World Air Forces 2021, which is published annually by the British magazine Flight International, today the Afghan Air Force and the special operations wing, which is not organizationally part of the Air Force, have such a composition.

    The Y-12 is a Chinese Harbin Y-12 transport aircraft.
    1. +1
      3 August 2021 16: 47
      PC-12NG - Swiss aircraft Pilatus PC-12 in the Next Generation version.

      SA315 is a French helicopter Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama, assembled under license in India.
  9. +6
    3 August 2021 19: 22
    A very interesting article, I read it with pleasure. Thanks to the author.
    My opinion on the title of the article is most likely agony.
    I will explain:
    Without touching flight personnel training, training, tactics, etc.
    But IAS is not enough to teach the fueling and suspension of the BC on the s-you.
    There is a lot of everything, it's lazy to describe everything.
    In order for the Asians to fulfill all the requirements of the NIAS, a white Sahib with a stick must stand over each one and it hurts to beat for the slightest retreat. This is a conclusion from operating experience.
    “In general, the level of training of the Afghan flight and technical personnel is assessed as good.” I doubt it very much.
  10. +4
    3 August 2021 21: 39
    On the contrary, instead of complying with the terms of the treaty in May 2021 in connection with the withdrawal of foreign military contingent from Afghanistan, the Taliban militants launched a large-scale offensive across the country. By mid-July, the Islamists managed to establish control over 80% of the territory of Afghanistan.

    Sergei!
    Absolutely correct.
    Islamic civilization will never keep its word given to the wrong.
    Never.
    This was written about 1000 years ago, and 500 years ago, and 40 years ago ...
    And now it is being written again ...
    Because generations change, and everyone needs to make sure that Islam and the agreement of an Islamist with an infidel are mutually exclusive things ...
  11. +2
    4 August 2021 08: 24
    Why doesn't Russia have its own Super Tucano? With comparable characteristics to helicopters, the cost of a flight hour is much less. But anti-guerrilla aircraft are very relevant. When in the affected area of ​​MANPADS, the thermal signature is less.
    1. +2
      4 August 2021 08: 55
      Quote: alberigo
      Why doesn't Russia have its own Super Tucano?

      During the Soviet era, generals were preparing for a big war, and the turboprop attack aircraft did not fit into this concept. In both Chechen wars, the main striking force was the Su-25 and Mi-24. Although the cost of a flight hour is very high for them, attack aircraft and combat helicopters are well mastered and a large stock of spare parts has been accumulated for them. Now we might and would like to have something like "Bronco" or "Super Tucano", but where to get
      modern economical theater of the required power?
  12. 0
    5 August 2021 00: 26
    Nice article, thanks for the info. Let's see the development of events.
  13. -3
    5 August 2021 00: 29
    Soon Afghanistan will pass into the zealous hands of the Mujahideen and the country will not need a lot of planes, the main thing is that there is enough poppy fields to handle pests.
  14. 0
    12 August 2021 12: 54
    As the author noted, the enemy of the Afghan Air Force lacks MANPADS. This, obviously, simplifies their life, and makes it easier for the Americans to select aircraft for their wards. Well, how will MANPADS appear? Now, apparently, there is some tacit agreement between the tyrant powers - not to supply such complexes to spirits. But after all, in addition to the local forbidden, alien "blacks" also operate there. What will they bring there and where ...
    1. 0
      12 September 2021 04: 32
      Quote: toha124
      Well, how will MANPADS appear?

      If Russia. as at one time the United States supplied the mujahideen with the PRK, all these supertuskans would fall from the sky like ripe pears.
      1. +3
        12 September 2021 04: 48
        Quote: certero
        If Russia. as at one time the United States supplied the mujahideen with the PRK, all these supertuskans would fall from the sky like ripe pears.

        First of all, the Mi-17 and Mi-35, which the Afghans had, would have been "poured". The vulnerability of turboprop attack aircraft to missiles with IR-seeker is much lower.
  15. +2
    12 September 2021 04: 30
    An interesting article, as usual, the whole technique is described in great detail. Well, how cool is it now to read predictions that after the withdrawal of American troops, a precarious balance will be established between the Taliban and pro-state forces :)
    1. +3
      12 September 2021 04: 46
      Quote: certero
      Well, how cool is it now to read predictions that after the withdrawal of American troops, a precarious balance will be established between the Taliban and the pro-state forces :)

      Well, apparently I'm a shitty prophet ... request The swift withdrawal of the US armed forces and the scammers of their Afghan allies will still come back to haunt the Americans. What guided the Biden administration is not clear.
  16. 0
    12 September 2021 13: 31
    Quote: Bongo
    The vulnerability of turboprop attack aircraft to missiles with IR-seeker is much lower

    So far, this is an absolutely unconfirmed statement.
    At least because in those areas where there is a manned anti-aircraft missile system, these things did not fly.
    Yes, and it seems strange to me that they are less vulnerable if the su-25 MANPADS managed to beat which is much more thrust-armed.
    1. +3
      12 September 2021 13: 44
      Quote: certero
      So far, this is an absolutely unconfirmed statement.
      At least because in those areas where there is a manned anti-aircraft missile system, these things did not fly.
      Yes, and it seems strange to me that they are less vulnerable if the su-25 MANPADS managed to beat which is much more thrust-armed.

      It is absolutely obvious that the vulnerability of the A-29 to MANPADS due to its lower thermal signature than the Su-25 and the higher flight speed than the Mi-24 will be much lower.
  17. 0
    12 September 2021 13: 32
    Quote: Bongo
    Well, apparently I'm a shitty prophet ...

    So it is not only you, it is absolutely all so written.
    Find at least one statement that everything will be over in just a few days.
    This is by the way to the question of all the so-called analysts :)
  18. -2
    12 September 2021 14: 14
    Quote: Bongo
    It is absolutely obvious that the vulnerability of the A-29 to MANPADS due to its lower thermal signature than the Su-25 and the higher flight speed than the Mi-24 will be much lower.

    I repeat, this is a statement that has not yet been confirmed by practice. MANPADS of the latest generations allow you to shoot not only on catch-up courses, so the contrast of the target against the background of the sky is the main thing.
    1. +1
      12 September 2021 14: 19
      Quote: certero
      I repeat, this is a statement that has not yet been confirmed by practice. MANPADS of the latest generations allow you to shoot not only on catch-up courses, so the contrast of the target against the background of the sky is the main thing.


      Do I understand correctly, you undertake to assert that the vulnerability of combat aircraft with turbojet engines and combat helicopters, under equal conditions, will be lower than that of turboprop attack aircraft with a much lower thermal signature?
      Yes, and I am extremely interested in how many serial MANPADS use a photocontrast channel?
  19. 0
    13 September 2021 02: 27
    Quote: Bongo
    You undertake to assert that the vulnerability of combat aircraft with turbojet engines and combat helicopters, under equal conditions, will be lower than that of turboprop attack aircraft with a much lower thermal signature.

    I argued that so far the Tuskans have not flown where there are MANPADS.
    Therefore, your claim that they can better withstand such a means of struggle requires confirmation.
    Actually, our discussion began with this YOUR statement.