"Product 305": will the Mi-28 and Ka-52 get the best weapons in their class?

42

Ka-52 / © Russian Helicopters

Videoconferencing pride


Attack helicopters are something that Russia can be proud of. In addition to it, only a few countries in the world can offer something in this regard, including the United States and China. In recent years, Russia has developed two conditionally new helicopters - Mi-28NM and Ka-52M.

In 2020, a source said that the first new Mi were handed over to the Russian armed forces. As for the Kamov car, it made its first flight last year. Among its main distinguishing features is an active phased array radar (AFAR). In turn, the Mi-28NM boasts a standard installation of an H025-type overhead radar, new engines, improved visibility (against the background of earlier versions of the Mi-28) and some other features.




However, there is one problem that is relevant for both the new Mi and Kamov helicopters. This is the composition of the weaponry. Everything is learned in comparison - let's look at the way the West went. American Apache can carry AGM-114L Longbow Hellfire anti-tank missiles, which, thanks to a combined homing head, operate on a “fire and forget” principle. The same applies to the new JAGM rocket, which is being created to replace the Hellfire. The Germans use PARS 3 LR for their Eurocopter Tiger helicopters, which also implements the popular principle. A new multi-mode Future Tactical Air-to-Surface Missile (MAST-F) missile is being created for the French attack "Eurocopters", which will replace the AGM-114K-1A / N-1 Hellfire II.


Russia does not look like a leader here. The Mi-28N combat helicopter can use Attack missiles with a radio command control system. The Ka-52s have a Vortex-1 with a laser system in their arsenal. The last ATGM is more modern, but when the rocket moves towards the target, it is necessary that at least at the final stage of the trajectory the laser beam is directed directly at it. That is, as in the case of the "Attack", the pilot is constrained in maneuver and forced to "lead" the target, as during the confrontation between the USSR and the United States.

Russia, of course, is not “unique” in this respect. Modern aviation weapon costs gigantic funds, and only a few countries in the world can afford the level of the United States or, say, Germany (despite the fact that there have always been many questions to the aforementioned German PARS 3 LR, which, in particular, related to their gigantic price). And yet, obviously, the trend has long been outlined.

Strange "Product"


Russia does not have many projects in the field of aircraft weapons, which were talked about as often as about the "Product 305" (you can, of course, recall the long history with the adoption of the R-77 medium-range air-to-air missile, but this is a separate topic). The new rocket is de facto positioned as a remedy for all problems. The "long arm" of attack helicopters, which can lead Russia to the first place in the world.

On closer inspection, things look more complicated. First, let's look at the characteristics of the rocket. It has a combined guidance head and uses an inertial system in the first phase of flight and a homing head in the last. The rocket will be able to operate effectively day and night, in any weather conditions, and will use the "fire and forget" principle. The high performance of the rocket is achieved, among other things, due to the aerodynamic "canard" configuration with developed nose aerodynamic rudders. At different times, the media indicated different ranges, up to 100 kilometers.


It is believed that due to the large dive angles on the target, the missile will be able to easily “break through” the projectile barrier of the “Trophy” active defense systems. The latter, we recall, recently the Americans equip their "Abrams" (at least partially). In addition, the Trophy is being integrated into the German Leopard 2A7.

The rocket has already passed some tests and at least partially confirmed its potential.

"The newest product 305 long-range guided missile with a combined guidance system is being tested in Syria from a standard launch vehicle."

- said a TASS source in 2019.

The "standard carrier" most likely means the Mi-28NM helicopter. It is also known that the Ka-52M will also be able to use the new missile.


What does the mysterious "Product" look like? Taking into account the presented characteristics, it can be assumed that it is larger and heavier than conventional aviation anti-tank guided missiles. Probably, the rocket has a mass of up to 200 kilograms: for comparison, the Vikhr ATGM has a mass of 45 kilograms.

Indirectly, these data are confirmed by the media, which reported that the attack helicopter will be able to carry up to four new missiles.

“Flight tests of the“ Product-305 ”helicopter cruise missiles with a maximum range of 100 kilometers continue. The upgraded Mi-28NM Night Hunter will be able to carry four of these missiles on external sling points. "

- quoted in May the words of a knowledgeable source by the RIA agency News.

It is also noteworthy that the source indicated potential targets for the missiles. They are seen as “enemy command posts, weapons depots, other important military infrastructure and manpower accumulations". That is, de facto, the missile is designed for approximately the same purpose for which the Soviet X-25 and the Russian X-38 are designed. And it would look good in the arsenal of a front-line bomber, but not an attack helicopter, the goals and objectives of which initially lie in a different plane (in particular, in the plane of fighting enemy armored vehicles).


Provided that four missiles are the "ceiling", it is possible that in real combat conditions the Mi-28 will carry up to two such products. Considering that ATGM "Attack" helicopter can carry sixteen units, the choice of weapons of the future makes you think. In fact, Russia will receive not so much an analogue of the AGM-114L Longbow Hellfire or AGM-179 JAGM, as a "helicopter" version of the Maverick. A good weapon, but, undoubtedly, expensive and having a very considerable mass.

Whether this is true or not, we will probably find out soon. So far, one thing can be stated: Russia in recent years has developed a lot of aviation weapons for attack helicopters, fighter-bombers and strategic aircraft. Undoubtedly, they all deserve attention.

At the same time, the country does not yet have in service with complexes similar to the Western AGM-179, SPEAR 3 or GBU-53 / B StormBreaker. Which would combine high accuracy, long range and a relatively low (against the background of larger aircraft ammunition) price. Perhaps it will be possible to implement this soon: at least some progress in this direction is taking place.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -13
    2 August 2021 05: 08
    Here is another author questioning the quality characteristics: "Best in class", "The best in the world", "there are no analogues in the world." It is already not clear in which class Russia is studying, but one thing is clear: the declared successes are the prospect of the near future. They left us for the second year ... in our class.
    1. +2
      2 August 2021 08: 15
      -They are seen as "enemy command posts, warehouses with weapons, other important objects of military infrastructure and accumulations of manpower."
      Product 305 "attacks the target at an angle of about 70-80 degrees, which reduces the likelihood of intercepting the missile and increases the effectiveness of the strike, since it falls on the least protected upper surface of the tank.
      1. +1
        4 October 2021 22: 46
        Armored vehicles are not in the list of suitable targets for this product. This means that her warhead is not sharpened against armor. High-explosive most likely. Hence the "accumulations of manpower"
        How can a helicopter aim at a tank from a range of under 100 km? No way. And to use a missile launcher flying at 100 km, on a tank from 7 km, is like a strategic CD to smack on dugouts.
  2. 0
    2 August 2021 05: 17
    Perhaps we will find out, provided ... the article is replete with such abbreviations.
    How to draw any conclusions on this shaky basis? what
    Some understatements.
    1. +12
      2 August 2021 06: 45
      If the author knew everything exactly and write about it, he would definitely sit down in places very far from home ... wink
      1. -12
        2 August 2021 09: 25
        Quote: Sahalinets
        write about it - I would definitely sit down

        That is unlikely. Now everything is for sale, which means not only no secrecy, but also vice versa, as much information noise as possible.
        1. +9
          2 August 2021 11: 34
          They are imprisoned regularly, even for disclosing them on the forums. One comrade from Komsa added this to the Airbase.
  3. -9
    2 August 2021 05: 24
    The article is "blurry" like the photo in it.
    1. -5
      2 August 2021 05: 53
      smile Whatever happens.
  4. +14
    2 August 2021 06: 14
    the country does not yet have in service with complexes similar to the western AGM-179, SPEAR 3 or GBU-53 / B StormBreaker

    Because it does not have a developed electronics industry.
    What is a rocket - an engine, a guidance system plus a control system.
    Glory to the USSR, we know how to make the engine and steering cars. But the guidance system in the form of a "smart" seeker cannot be cut out of a log, there are high technologies of a tube. But we haven't been shooting locators since the seventies.
    Although .... at the end of last year or the beginning of this year there was a series of news that there are real successes here too. And there will be a "head", it will be possible to fasten it to any rocket, even to the 300 product, even to the "whirlwind" with "attack".
    1. D16
      -1
      2 August 2021 07: 57
      But we haven't been shooting locators since the seventies.

      And we are doing the right thing. In the current wars, ATGMs Attack and Whirlwind are quite sufficient for the Barmaley carts. It makes no sense to use expensive ASPs there. But this does not mean that over time they will not appear. They will just be used only as needed.
      1. +3
        2 August 2021 18: 44
        Quote: D16
        But we haven't been shooting locators since the seventies.

        And we are doing the right thing. In the current wars, ATGMs Attack and Whirlwind are quite sufficient for the Barmaley carts. It makes no sense to use expensive ASPs there. But this does not mean that over time they will not appear. They will just be used only as needed.


        And if not the barmaley, but at least Azerbaijan with the support of Turkey?
        1. D16
          0
          3 August 2021 08: 00
          Why does Azerbaijan need support from Turkey, which has successfully merged part of Idlib? Azerbaijanis have never seen a war with Russia in their worst dreams.
          1. +5
            3 August 2021 08: 07
            Quote: D16
            Why does Azerbaijan need support from Turkey, which has successfully merged part of Idlib? Azerbaijanis have never seen a war with Russia in their worst dreams.

            In 2008, Georgians?
            In 2014, the Ukrainians?
            And all in the most dreadful dream ...
            And before that, there were 2 Chechen wars with the participation of Russian troops.
            Never say never.
            Your thoughts and reality diverge ...
            1. D16
              +1
              3 August 2021 14: 07
              Azerbaijanis are not as stupid as you think, and even with such examples in front of your eyes. And they, unlike non-brothers, understand that neither America nor Turkey will fight Russia for them. In addition, neither Georgians nor Ukrainians were going to fight directly with Russia, hoping that Russia would not intervene and would allow Russians to be killed with impunity. And Chechnya is generally past the box office. At that time, they rather relied on the state. a coup in Russia itself.
              1. 0
                11 August 2021 14: 00
                Quote: D16
                Azerbaijanis are not as stupid as you think, and even with such examples in front of your eyes.

                judging by the barking (grunting) of the former Azerbaijani ambassador to Belarus, Isfandiyar Vagabzade, who insulted the entire Russian People, this is not the case.
  5. +1
    2 August 2021 06: 45
    In size it resembles a rocket of the P60 type ... and the trends are now in the direction of various Spikes. And this is the next stage of development
  6. +5
    2 August 2021 08: 37
    Not only helicopters, but attack drones need lighter weapons and shoot-and-forget. The USA has this - Hellfire, but when will we have it?
    1. +1
      2 August 2021 09: 22
      Quote: riwas
      and when will it be with us?

      When our "largest microcircuits" begin to fit within the missile dimensions.
  7. +1
    2 August 2021 09: 34
    And they wrote, here and not here, that we are ahead of the rest of the planet in anti-tank missiles ...

    And mini winged - up to 100 km, and ordinary - up to 20 km. but I don’t remember about aiming, whether it was mentioned ...
    1. +4
      2 August 2021 18: 46
      Quote: Max1995
      And they wrote, here and not here, that we are ahead of the rest of the planet in anti-tank missiles ...

      And mini winged - up to 100 km, and ordinary - up to 20 km. but I don’t remember about aiming, whether it was mentioned ...

      Why mention something that is unclear and incomprehensible to the warlike sofa layman?
      For the layman, after all, the main thing is that a hundred kilometers ...
      And as guidance, but at least the detection of a target for 100 km - to ensure - the inhabitants do not concern.
      It's like a blind runner ...
      Of course, he has the strength to run 100 km, only his eyes don't see him and he certainly won't get to the finish line (to the goal) ..
  8. +2
    2 August 2021 09: 56
    Quote: knn54
    Product 305 "attacks the target at an angle of about 70-80 degrees, which reduces the likelihood of intercepting the missile and increases the effectiveness of the strike, since it falls on the least protected upper surface of the tank.

    The statement is true for armored vehicles that are not equipped with the Trophy. But with the Trophy it will not be so simple, since the Trophy provides protection (at least in words) from anti-tank missiles and similar ammunition in the entire upper hemisphere (360 degrees in azimuth and 180 degrees in elevation). Until recently, only the Israelis could boast of such protection on their Merkava 4 MBTs and on the Namer heavy armored personnel carrier, and now the Abrams are being modernized in terms of the Trophy installation. Next in line is a similar modernization of the German Leopards. Perhaps the Brits will also take the Trophy into service in order to increase the protection of their sequestered Challengers
    1. -7
      2 August 2021 10: 46
      Learn materiel - golimy "Trophy" provide protection only 40 degrees in elevation. It has a dead zone of 100 degrees in the upper hemisphere.
  9. +5
    2 August 2021 10: 05
    200 kg? A missile that is promised a range of up to 25 km? belay Lads! Shaw do you smoke? (The Ministry of Health warns (!): Smoking is harmful!) The product 305 rocket is a derivative of the Hermes project! And sho we can learn about "Hermes"? Well, for example the following:Rocket
    Mass-dimensional characteristics:
    Rockets:
    Length: <3,5m
    Rocket accelerator diameter: 0,21 m or 0,17 m (depending on range)
    Diameter of the second stage: 0,13 m
    Weight: 90 kg
    TPK:
    Length: 3,5 m
    Diameter:> 0,21 m or> 0,17 m (depending on range)
    The weight:
    GVW with rocket: 130 kg or 110 kg (depending on range)
    Rocket weight in TPK: 127 kg or 107 kg (depending on range)
    Warhead:
    Type: high-explosive fragmentation
    The weight:
    Warhead: 28 kg
    Explosive: 18 kg

    Author! Where have you gone, sir, to ......... have you gone?
    The "country" needs an anti-tank missile, so why not list the warehouses, oil storage facilities, bunkers, command posts, toilets of the "Emperor Wilhelm" available to the PF warhead of the "Hermes"? "Hermes" is "Hermes"! Leave the "305th product" to the tanks! Back in the 50s of the last century, a series of anti-tank missiles, conventionally called OPS (1-7), was developed! The heaviest (70-kilogram) radio-controlled projectile with a cruising speed of 270 m / s had a range of 30 km (!). The length of the projectile was 3 m, and the caliber was 220 mm.
    Author! Where are you with your 200 kg?
    PS Damn! Got it! Nobody knows anything; but to hurry up the stump mean - they are always the first!
    1. +2
      3 August 2021 17: 48
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      The product 305 rocket is a derivative of the Hermes project!

      I didn't even lie nearby :)
      As far as I know, even KB is different.
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Crap! Got it! Nobody knows anything

      No, some know, but they are silent, you bastards. :)
      1. -1
        3 August 2021 21: 01
        Even if, indeed, the 305th is being developed by another design bureau; this does not mean that, by agreement, the design bureau's developments were not used. dealing with "Hermes"! In addition, if I am mistaken, then I am not the only one .... in various messages there have been suggestions more than once that the "product 305" uses the work of "Hermes"! For example,"Product 305" is a missile of the promising Hermes-A anti-tank complex, a long-awaited novelty of the domestic military-industrial complex, according to the magazine "New Defense Order. Strategies "!. or...IVLADIVOSTOK, 20 March 2019, 13:05 - REGNUM New opportunities are provided to pilots by the Hermes-A supersonic anti-tank missile, also known as the Product 305, developed by the Tula Instrument Design Bureau. In the future, the new missile system will allow the Russian army aviation to fight against enemy armored vehicles at ranges over 20 kilometers, reports IA REGNUM with reference to the developer's website.


        There are also similar messages ... The "Hermes" topic could have died out in one design bureau ... "an enterprise or a member of the same holding! It remains to wait a while ... and everything will become clear!
        1. +1
          3 August 2021 21: 10
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          The theme "Hermes" could have died out in one design bureau ... it became not "interesting" (not relevant) for the design bureau and could later be transferred (sold) to another design bureau ... it is possible that a "subsidiary" enterprise or part of the same holding


          As far as I know, the developers of Idelia 305 do not need the Hermes work from the word "absolutely". They have a different cooperation of producers.
  10. 0
    2 August 2021 10: 39
    Will he get it? Will receive. And then there is a simple verbal diarrhea. I won't tell you anything else)).
  11. +8
    2 August 2021 11: 00
    Attack helicopters are something that Russia can be proud of. In addition to it, only a few countries in the world can offer something in this regard, including the United States and China.

    And also Italy, France, Germany, Spain, South Africa, Turkey.

  12. +3
    2 August 2021 15: 24
    You don't know anything in common with Hermes. Hermes-bikalibrennav rocket and 305 even vnvnshne completely different. I read somewhere that it weighs about 90 kg
  13. 0
    3 August 2021 14: 36
    Why is this super secrecy, hid the appearance of the rocket and the meaning? In aerodynamics, nothing will surprise anyone. It seems that they work on the principle of secreting everything that is possible, without particularly understanding the details.
  14. +2
    3 August 2021 18: 24
    The new rocket is de facto positioned as a remedy for all problems. The "long arm" of attack helicopters, which can lead Russia to the first place in the world.

    De facto, it is positioned as a new weapon system for the Mi-28NM. It will not lead Russia to the first place. Although (if my sources do not darken and do not muddy the water) and will make the Mi-28NM, perhaps, the most versatile attack helicopter at the moment.

    It has a combined guidance head and uses an inertial system in the first phase of flight and a homing head in the last. The rocket will be able to operate effectively day and night, in any weather conditions and will use the principle “shot-forgot».


    No, but the concept of "shot-got"will really be perfected. The rocket will have a multispectral seeker. This will really make it all-weather and round-the-clock."

    At different times, the media indicated different ranges, up to 100 kilometers.

    The rocket is being made for the Mi-28. The Milians are not in the habit of making combat vehicles that cannot independently perform combat missions. Therefore, the new missile is unlikely to have a range greater than the range of the helicopter's search and targeting system. But in comparison with existing missiles, it will indeed be long-range.

    "Enemy command posts, weapons depots, other important military infrastructure and manpower accumulations." That is, de facto, the missile is designed for approximately the same purpose for which the Soviet X-25 and the Russian X-38 are designed. And it would look good in the arsenal of a front-line bomber, but not an attack helicopter, the goals and objectives of which initially lie in a different plane (in particular, in the plane of fighting enemy armored vehicles).


    The destruction of the object is not always carried out at the expense of the size. Often due to other features of the ammunition. And no, in the arsenal of a front-line bomber, judging by the data I have, such a missile would hardly have found a place. But not because of the type of goals, with goals, just the authors guessed right, though not completely. She can also have tanks. :)


    Provided that four missiles are the "ceiling", it is possible that in real combat conditions the Mi-28 will carry up to two such products.


    Strange logic ... As far as I understand, if they say 4, then they equip 4. But, of course to exclude nothing is allowed.

    Considering that ATGM "Attack" helicopter can carry sixteen units, the choice of weapons of the future makes you think.


    Any choice is a reason to think. But in this case, everything is simpler: the range does not come by itself, the new missile has at least 2,5 times more, and knowing ours, most likely again 10 percent will be "not guaranteed stable tracking." :)

    In fact, Russia will receive not so much an analogue of the AGM-114L Longbow Hellfire or AGM-179 JAGM, as a "helicopter" version of the Maverick. A good weapon, but undoubtedly expensive

    Yes? Is shooting with Hellfire Longbow disposable thermal imagers cheap? :) No, it won't be Maverick. The new rocket has foreign counterparts, but not from this opera.

    Russia in recent years has developed a lot of aviation weapons for attack helicopters

    This is NOT a recent development. This is an implementation of a rather old concept and ideas. It's just that an element base has appeared for them today.

    the country does not yet have in service with complexes similar to the western AGM-179, SPEAR 3 or GBU-53 / B StormBreaker. Which would combine high accuracy, long range and a relatively low (against the background of larger aircraft ammunition) price.


    Moreover, the country does not have its own "laser boeing", "keel-up destroyer", "battle penguin" and "armored carts for a million." And, that's good and right. That the country does not shoot at $ 35 jeeps with rockets for $ 180. That people in the country consider money not in relation to something, but absolutely. That is why I do not shoot with disposable radars and thermal imagers. But they know how to throw cast iron on the head of the enemy individually and accurately.

    PS. I’ll tell the critics right away that I’m not putting a premium on myself and don’t let any secrets go. It's just that my data is not verified and may not be correct.
  15. +2
    4 August 2021 00: 07
    Eh, where do such unfortunate analysts come from? Yes, we don't have AGM-114K-1A / N-1 Hellfire II and that's very good. One has only to see how this device works, it immediately becomes calm about the future of our armored forces. For the ATGM, which has such a "phenomenal" launch range, first flies just in that direction and only at the final stage does the radar seeker begin to work. And it takes almost a minute for this.
    Yes, that's not even the point. It's just that the very principle of "let it go" in relation to armored vehicles is vicious in the bud. At least before the advent of artificial intelligence.
    For the simple reason that a tank is much stronger than even an armored aircraft / helicopter. It's not enough just to hit the tank, you need to get to the right place, of which there are not so many on it.
    The second important problem is target identification. Here, even the most perfect detector, as the eyes of an experienced operator, can make mistakes. And as for the radar seeker, everything is the same, a functioning tank, long destroyed, an inflatable model covered with metallization, or just a pile of scrap metal.
    And for that matter, we have long-range homing air-to-ground missiles for front-line aviation. So let them carry these toys.
    And the helicopters need to leave what they actually do, work on the front edge, especially in conditions of close contact with the enemy. Where visual identification comes first and the ability to retarget already launched ATGMs is of no small importance. Due to this, tele-guidance using the three-point method is an ideal option, as long as, I repeat, a full-fledged artificial intelligence has not been invented.
    And if what needs to be improved in the first place is the two-way exchange of information and target designation between the supported ground forces and helicopters.
    You also have to think with your head what you really need for the battle, and not look back at the Americans and frantically copy. We have already gone through this.
    1. 0
      4 October 2021 23: 09
      You write almost correctly, but not at all. Don't be offended.
      The detection and identification of targets for all is performed by the helicopter operator using the sighting complex. After that, ours chooses one target and aims the ATGM at it. Most often with hands, tk. auto tracking does not work well for us (see videos from Syria).
      The operator selects several targets from amers and shoots Hellfire at each.
      All normal long-range URs include their "heads" in the final section. Everything. Otherwise, the launch range will be the same as that of the NAR.
      Having turned on the Hellfire radar seeker, in the place where the target should be, it finds an object with the dimensions corresponding to the given target, and itself aims at its center.
      All missile launchers and ATGMs are aimed at the center of their target. Our ATGM (modern) aim bluntly into the laser spot. Or stupidly at the operator's commands.
      No one is yet able to target the vulnerable parts of the tank. Especially in the figurative black-and-white TV picture from 10-15 km, when the target-tank is a bunch of pixels (again, look at the videos from Syria).
  16. 0
    4 August 2021 15: 35
    Good article. The author is plus.
    The backlog of the electronic base remains.
  17. 0
    11 August 2021 13: 49
    Quote: Author
    pilot chained in maneuver and is forced to "lead" the goal,

    belay
    This is not "Ka-50", pilots - 2, how are they "constrained in the maneuver"?
    1. 0
      4 October 2021 22: 56
      They cannot lose sight of the target until the ATGM reaches it. Moreover, the AU of the sight works poorly and therefore sudden movements by a helicopter are contraindicated. Listen to the in-cockpit radio traffic from Syria, navigator-operator to the pilot: "I'm holding it! (Manually, AC crap) Just don't twitch!"
      After the launch of Hellfire, you can immediately fall back or down behind the trees / relief on all four sides.
  18. 0
    21 August 2021 10: 48
    What is the point of spending the country's budget on the production of expensive missiles for attack helicopters with a range of 100 km? Isn't it easier to spend money on one missile to destroy a helicopter carrier? Or their base.
  19. 0
    24 August 2021 07: 22
    A fun way to write articles. In general, he does not know anything on the topic of the article, but he scribbled something.
  20. 0
    10 September 2021 01: 55
    Name me at least one brigade where the attached helicopters perform the task of supporting the infantry or are used as anti-tank weapons ... while the alliance was building a million tanks, NATO was developing means of dealing with them! While our army men will be tied to the combat regulations of the Second World War, there can be no talk of any modern development of the army !!!
  21. +1
    26 September 2021 16: 18
    will the Mi-28 and Ka-52 get the best weapons in their class?

    Of course not. Until the person with his Caudla leaves the Kremlin, there will be no major improvements.
  22. 0
    4 October 2021 22: 51
    Some kind of helicopter-based OTRK turns out ...
    And our helicopters really need a normal anti-tank missile system.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"