The Turkish fleet was "already completely defeated to the extreme"

37
The Turkish fleet was "already completely defeated to the extreme"
Battle of Cape Kaliakria on July 31, 1791. Artist I. N. Dementyev

Turkey is defeated


The campaign of 1790 was disastrous for Turkey. The Russian army on the Danube takes the fortresses of Kiliya, Tulcha and Isakcha. Alexander Suvorov destroys almost the entire Turkish army in Izmail. The Russian fleet under the command of Ushakov smashes the Turkish Navy at the Kerch Strait and Cape Tendra.

Porta leaned towards peace, as her resources were depleted by the war. For its part, Petersburg also wanted peace, since Russia had to fight on two fronts (the war with the Swedes in 1788-1790). Also, Russia had to take into account the possibility of an uprising in Poland, against us by Prussia, for which England stood. Therefore, it was necessary to keep large forces in the western direction. About half a million recruits were drafted into the army, the government feared a new Pugachev regime.



However, the West opposed the peaceful Russian-Turkish negotiations.

Russia's successes in the Balkans and in the Black Sea region alarmed the Western powers. England, Holland and Prussia supported Turkey. The Prussian king Frederick Wilhelm II concluded an agreement with Turkey, promising the inviolability of the Ottoman possessions, deployed a large army on the Russian and Austrian borders and began to persuade the Swedes and Poles to war with Russia. England promised to send its fleet to put pressure on Petersburg. Having suffered a series of setbacks on the Turkish front, experiencing problems within the country, and under pressure from Prussia, England and Holland, Austria - an ally of Russia, signed a peace treaty with the Turks.

As a result, Turkey decided to continue the war, send new troops to the Danube Theater during the 1791 campaign and try to land troops in the Crimea in order to raise an anti-Russian uprising there.

However, Turkey's hopes for help from the West did not materialize. In England, the policy of the Pitt cabinet met with resistance from the opposition, which did not want to complicate relations with Russia at a time when the French question was aggravated. In France in 1789 the revolution began, which more and more riveted the attention of London. Therefore, the English fleet remained at home. And Prussia, not receiving help from the British, did not dare to start a war with Russia. The Prussians preferred to negotiate with Petersburg and divide Poland.

The Russian high command, proceeding from the unfavorable foreign policy situation (large forces had to be kept on the northwestern and western borders), first decided to go on the defensive. However, then it was decided to carry out a number of offensive operations. Repnin's army crossed the Danube and defeated the 80-strong Turkish army at Machin (How the Russians crushed the Turkish army in the Battle of Machin), Gudovich's Kuban-Crimean corps stormed the "Caucasian Izmail" - Anapa (How the Russians took "Caucasian Izmail"), where a large enemy corps was destroyed.

As a result, the grand vizier again sat down at the negotiating table.


The course of the battle in the painting from the end of the XNUMXth century. A. Depaldo

The appearance of the enemy


The Russian naval fleet, located in Sevastopol, in May 1791 received the task of looking for Turkish ships, disrupting enemy communications going from Constantinople to the Danube.

On July 3, 1791, the Turkish-Algerian fleet appeared at Anapa. The Ottoman command planned to land troops here, which, with the support of fleet was supposed to create a threat in the Crimea. The sea was strewn with the bodies of those killed in the battle for Anapa, the ships began to ferment crews and soldiers who were afraid of landing. Therefore, the Ottoman commanders took the fleet to the Bulgarian coast, becoming in Kaliakria in the Varna region, under the cover of coastal batteries.

Kapudan Pasha Hussein and the Algerian Vice Admiral Seit Ali Pasha, having superiority in ships and frigates, hoped to defeat the Sevastopol squadron. Seid-Ali promised the Sultan to bring Ushakov to Istanbul in a cage.

The Turkish-Algerian fleet consisted of 18 battleships, 17 frigates (including 10 battleships capable of standing in line with battleships), about 50 small ships. A total of about 1500 guns.

Fedor Fedorovich Ushakov was in Sevastopol at that time, as he could not equip the ships in time. The north-westerly wind also interfered. The fleet left Sevastopol on July 10, 1791. On the 12th, the Russians saw enemy ships heading for Sevastopol. The opponents were going to start a battle, but due to the lack of a favorable wind, they could not maneuver and dispersed in two days. The Ottoman fleet left towards Varna. The Russians returned to Sevastopol to replenish supplies.

On July 29, the Russian fleet went out again to search for the enemy. The Sevastopol squadron included 16 ships, 2 frigates, 2 bombardment ships and 17 auxiliary ships. Ushakov's squadron headed south-west, taking advantage of the favorable wind, they went under full sail and two days later reached the Turkish coast. Then the fleet moved along the coast. The Ottomans at this time were at Kaliakria. Being on their territory, under the protection of coastal batteries and having superiority in the number of pennants and naval guns, the Ottoman admirals felt completely safe. Some of the teams from the Turkish ships were on the shore.


Battle


On the morning of July 31, 1791, Hussein Pasha was informed that ships appeared on the horizon. Soon the Turks saw that this was the Russian fleet.

The closer Ushak Pasha approached, the more obvious his determination to start a battle became. To stun the enemy and win an advantageous windward position, the Russian admiral made a bold decision: to send his ships between the coast and the Ottoman fleet. Sevastopol squadron at 14 o'clock. 45 minutes passed Cape Kaliakria and in three columns confidently walked along the coast. Turkish coastal batteries began shelling, but the Russians continued to confidently move forward. Cutting off the Ottomans from the coast, the Russians took up an advantageous position for the attack.

This caused confusion among the enemy.

The Turks cut the anchor ropes, set the sails and went out to sea. The first to follow was the "Mukkaddim-i Nusret" of Seit-Ali, Hussein tried to hold on to him, but his "Bahr-i Zafer" had an shortage in the crew and soon fell behind. The Ottoman ships were leaving the sea in such a hurry that with a fresh wind they could not keep the intervals between themselves, so some ships collided with each other. At first, the Turkish fleet went without formation. Then Hussein Pasha raised the signal to build a battle line to starboard tack. Turkish ships began to occupy their assigned places and formed a battle formation. But at this time the commander of the vanguard Seit-Ali, contrary to the signal of the commander-in-chief, turned the fleet behind him and arranged a line on the port tack.

The Turks were able to restore order. Meanwhile, the Russian ships, following Ushakov's instructions, overtook the enemy at maximum speed. The Russian fleet on the move rebuilt from three columns into a battle line parallel to the enemy armada. The Ottoman vanguard made an attempt to come forward, take a windward position and restrain the Russian maneuver. Ushakov guessed the enemy's maneuver. The flagship Rozhdestven Khristovo, under the command of Captain 1st Rank Yelchaninov, approached the Turkish junior flagship, bypassed it in front and opened fire. The Russians took Seid Pasha's ship for the main flagship, since it was the most powerful in the Ottoman fleet. Following the flagship, the entire Russian squadron approached the enemy and opened fire.

The Black Sea gunners fired much better than the enemy. Fires broke out on Turkish ships. The ship Seit-Ali suffered most of all, on which the fire of several of our ships was concentrated. There were many killed and wounded on the ship. The Turkish admiral himself was wounded. The Turkish junior flagship dropped out of the battle. His place was taken by two battleships and two frigates, which tried to cover their flagship. The ships "Alexander Nevsky", "John the Baptist" and "Stratilat", commanded by the captains of Yazykov, Baranov and Selivachev, concentrated fire against them. Soon the enemy vanguard was forced to turn back.

After the defeat of the enemy vanguard, the battle line of the Turkish fleet was disrupted. Confusion began again in Hussein Pasha's fleet. The Ottoman fleet, as Ushakov noted, was

"Very defeated, implicated and constrained so that the enemy ships themselves beat each other with their shots."

The Turkish fleet was outflanked from two flanks, and the enemy began to retreat indiscriminately. Only thick powder smoke, calmness and the onset of night saved the Ottomans from complete defeat. At half past eight in the evening Ushakov stopped the pursuit, and the fleet anchored. At midnight the wind rose, and the Russians began pursuit, but there was no sense in it.

The next day, Ushakov received news of the conclusion of an armistice with the enemy and turned the ships to Sevastopol.

Results


The next day the Turkish fleet was scattered between Varna and Constantinople. Many ships were badly damaged, without masts and yards, some could only move with the help of tugs, others were washed ashore in Anatolia. Several ships reached Constantinople and made a lot of noise with their appearance: the ships were wrecked, without masts, with many dead and wounded, who were lying on the decks. The Turkish fleet has lost its combat capability.

The Ottoman authorities were afraid that the Russian fleet would land troops in the Bosphorus. The Turks frantically began to strengthen the shores of the Bosphorus and the fortresses of the Strait zone. Ottoman dignitaries, fearing the wrath of the Sultan, reported to him about the victory of Seit Pasha's squadron over the Russians, who retreated to Sevastopol.

On October 14, Ushakov was awarded the Order of St. Alexander Nevsky. In the rescript of the Russian Empress Catherine II, it was noted on this occasion:

“The famous victory at the end of the last campaign by Our Black Sea Fleet, led by you, over the same Turkish one, won in the very vicinity of the Ottoman capital, where the enemy fleet was driven from the sea with its great defeat, serves as a new proof of zeal for Our service, special courage and art Yours, and acquires Our royal favor for you. "

The commanders of the avant-garde and rearguard, Major General of the Fleet Golenkin and Brigadier of the Fleet Pustoshkin, who distinguished themselves in the battle, were respectively awarded the Order of St. Vladimir II degree and St. George III class. 24 officers were awarded orders and 8 - golden swords. The lower ranks received a ruble each.

Unable to continue the war on land and at sea, without receiving help from the West, Turkey signed the Yassy Peace Treaty in December 1791.

The Northern Black Sea region, including the Crimea, was assigned to Russia. The Russians took over the area between the Southern Bug and the Dniester. In the North Caucasus, Taman became Russian, the border was established on the river. Kuban. The port refused to claim Georgia.


Monument to Admiral FF Ushakov at Cape Kaliakria. Bulgaria. Opened on August 10, 2006.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    2 August 2021 05: 25
    The event in the history of Russia is significant, and the article is excellent in content, but the monument to Admiral Ushakov in Bulgaria, purely aesthetically (in my opinion) - negative ...



    This is a "avant-garde" of some kind, something reminiscent of a monument-alteration to Peter the Great in the capital "piled" from the monument to Columbus.

    Or the figure of a wooden boatswain Rosenbaum from the cartoon "The Enchanted Boy" (Soyuzmultfilm) ....

  2. +20
    2 August 2021 05: 33
    Said-Ali:
    “I will bring him to Istanbul, chained! I'll take him around the city in a cage! "
    Ushakov:
    “Said, bum! I will wean you from making such promises "
    And weaned it. Somewhere here
    “The ship“ Christmas Christ ”, descending behind the stern of“ Fyodor Stratilat ”, hurried to approach the ship Seit-Ali, running in the middle of the fleet, so as not to let it go, and made heavy fire on it and along the entire enemy fleet, our line was very defeated, confused and constrained so that the enemy ships beat each other with their own shots. Our fleet, with its entire line of forward and rear ships, completely surrounded it and produced with such excellent liveliness a fierce fire that ... forced many ships to take cover one after another, and the enemy fleet at the beginning of night darkness was completely destroyed to the extreme ... and our fleet, having closed distance, drove and beat him with continuous fire with bow cannons, ”Ushakov wrote in a detailed report.
    Vivat Ushakov! Vivat to the Russian fleet!
    1. +11
      2 August 2021 05: 53
      Quote: SERGE ant
      Said-Ali:
      “I will bring him to Istanbul, chained! I'll take him around the city in a cage! "


      Algerian pirate in the rank of commander against the Russian admiral ...

      A still from the Soviet film "Admiral Ushakov" ( I recommend to see Yes ), 1953, one of the last, so-called - "Stalin's films" about the military history of the country.

      Vladimir Etush as Algerian Admiral Seydi-Ali


      1. +10
        2 August 2021 06: 37
        An excellent film, as well as a sequel - "Ships storm the bastions".
        Now they do not shoot like that, although there are a huge number of topics in the history of the Russian fleet.
        There is something to film!
  3. +11
    2 August 2021 06: 06
    "The Russians always beat the Turks" (A.V. Suvorov).
    Admiral Ushakov was popularly called "Boyar of the Russian Fleet".
    1. +9
      2 August 2021 06: 12
      Quote: knn54
      "The Russians always beat the Turks" (A.V. Suvorov).
      Admiral Ushakov was popularly called "Boyar of the Russian Fleet".

      And they put the name of Ushakov on a par with Suvorov.

      Admiral Ushakov, this is our Suvorov at sea. Yes

      And how surprisingly it coincided that two such outstanding personalities, precious nuggets, appeared with us, "crystallized" in Russia, at one historical moment ...
      1. +5
        2 August 2021 06: 30
        Peak
        And how surprisingly it coincided that two such outstanding personalities, precious nuggets, appeared with us, "crystallized" in Russia, at one historical moment ...

        The greatest and most important wealth in Russia is people. The hour will come and new admirals and generals will not disgrace the memory of their ancestors, now they are learning military affairs in a real way at unfamiliar training grounds!
    2. +1
      2 August 2021 08: 19
      helped by the French Revolution - the Englishwoman was distracted. and Prussia with Austria. joy .

      .....................................
  4. +4
    2 August 2021 06: 30
    After all, there were fighting fights,
    Yes, they say, even what!
    No wonder the whole of Russia remembers
    About the day ...............
    ... Russia remembers, but many, over the hill, will have to be reminded!
  5. +2
    2 August 2021 09: 26
    The Prussians preferred to negotiate with Petersburg and divide Poland ...

    Centuries succeed each other, but in human psychology and in big politics, nothing changes ...
  6. +6
    2 August 2021 11: 01
    Good afternoon, I'm Katya. "The lower ranks received a ruble" while soldiers and sailors were not distinguished by government awards. It was believed that the lower ranks had enough money. In the Civil War, they returned to the practice of encouraging valuable gifts.
    There was an exception to the rule: everyone who participated in the Battle of Chemsmen was awarded the "Was" medal
    1. +2
      2 August 2021 11: 12
      A valuable gift? Of course, including weapons, as well as ... red trousers.
      1. +2
        2 August 2021 12: 26
        Good afternoon. Film: "Officers" have seen before, but now ....
        1. +3
          2 August 2021 13: 23
          What now? On holidays, they constantly show. wink
          1. +2
            2 August 2021 14: 59
            As elsewhere - you just want to.
          2. 0
            3 August 2021 06: 31
            Young people are not interested in him. I checked: even many of my peers do not remember it and do not want to revise it
            1. 0
              3 August 2021 13: 57
              Is there an example of a movie that is interesting to EVERYONE, even among people of the same age?
              1. -1
                3 August 2021 14: 15
                These were: "Seventeen Moments of Spring", Gaidai's comedies, "Four Tankmen", "Pharaoh", "Adjutant of His Excellency", "Well, wait a minute"
                1. +1
                  3 August 2021 16: 03
                  You write about it with such confidence that I doubt it very well!
                  You try to understand for a start that there is an early Gaidai, by and large there are no questions to him, and there is a late Gaidai "creation" which is impossible to watch. Do you like late Ryazanov? Do you like late Mikhalkov? Like everyone, it's impossible, understand.

                  Here's a simple example. Indicate the goodies in comedies: "The Irony of Fate", "Office Romance"? Now think, are they actually positive?
                  1. 0
                    3 August 2021 20: 19
                    In the "Irony of Fate" or "Office Romance" of the good characters.
                    I did not watch the last films of Mikhalkov. Ryazanov's latest films suck.
                  2. 0
                    3 August 2021 21: 13
                    Sergey, Ryazanov has practically no division into negative and positive characters. He has conditionally negative and conditionally positive characters.
                    Mikhalkov, I somehow did not really appreciate, and my husband "stuck out" from: "Burnt Sun"
                    R.
                    S
                    Are you satisfied with my answer
                    1. 0
                      4 August 2021 22: 08
                      Absolutely not satisfied!
                      Ryazanov has semitones! What is this concept - "conditionally positive, conditionally negative hero" ???? That is, he is a "half-hero" ???? The main positive hero of "Irony ..." is Yakovlev's hero, although without flaw. "Office romance". Who is the main positive character? Myagkov? This mumbled? Figushki! Mymra! Played by charming Alisa Freundlich! Without halftones, he shot only two films - "Girl without an address" and "Hussar ballad". desire to debate? To the barrier! wink
                      1. 0
                        5 August 2021 06: 02
                        A girl without an address, I don't remember something. Probably saw, but forgot the name
                      2. 0
                        5 August 2021 09: 53
                        How? How so?!?!
                      3. 0
                        5 August 2021 14: 39
                        Do you remember all the films by the title? ... In that case, congratulations: you have a good memory.
                      4. 0
                        5 August 2021 16: 45
                        I also have a mind. I have it. And I write in accordance with the grammar. Once again I try to get through. Think! Think! Before you sit down for the "Claudia"!
            2. +1
              3 August 2021 16: 47
              Hello Katya!

              Young people are not interested in him.


              But my sons (two schoolchildren and two adults already with their families) watch it with interest and pleasure. And for some reason they don't ask questions. This I ask them, "what do you think, why he / she ...". Surprisingly, in response I get quite reasonable and thoughtful reasoning, even from the youngest postrel who is entering puberty. That is, the film causes them some kind of mental work, the desire to understand the motives and motivations of movie characters, and leads to some (quite logical) conclusions.
              And the second "amazing" - none of the four never asked me how and why I connected my fate with military service, giving her 40 calendars. It seems to them that this is a natural fact of the surrounding world, just like the daily sunrises and sunsets.
              And if asked, I would definitely name this film as one of the reasons!

              Best regards,
              Michael
              1. +1
                3 August 2021 20: 57
                Mikhail, I didn’t give Katka a phone number today.
                1. 0
                  3 August 2021 22: 57
                  I didn't give Katka a phone today

                  Well, okay. She spoke quite well and to the point!
                  1. +1
                    4 August 2021 08: 17
                    That's right, the day before yesterday Katka took the phone
                2. 0
                  5 August 2021 01: 37
                  It looks like a drunk woman showdown! laughing Why did you look at mine, huh ?!
              2. 0
                5 August 2021 09: 59
                Dear buddy! Believe it or not, this is a whole harem!

                To understand? It's useless. Just ... take it as it is. Zulfiya, Katya, Vera and ... the entire medical unit! laughing
                1. 0
                  5 August 2021 17: 02
                  Yes! Now it is clear why the people "flooded" into paid medicine! If such "doctors" climb into history.
            3. +1
              3 August 2021 17: 35
              PS
              Katia!
              If you're not lazy, look in the Opinions section for an article about Hero of the Soviet Union Milashenkov (Miloshenkov?).
              There, a sixth grader not only quotes Soviet films about the war, including "Officers", he gives out such a powerful, very masculine and mature civic position that half of the local jingoistic patriots should strangle themselves with envy!

              By the way, I've already found it: https://topwar.ru/182770-istoki-podviga.html
  7. 0
    3 August 2021 20: 40
    That's right anti-tsushima.
  8. +1
    4 August 2021 07: 22
    Quote: "To stun the enemy and win an advantageous windward position, the Russian admiral made a bold decision: to send his ships between the coast and the Ottoman fleet."
    This is not entirely true. What I will write is not in history textbooks, but you will understand everything.
    Итак ...
    At 14 o'clock there was no wind (from the description of the battle), which means that there was hardly a wind in the morning. If only the wind with the flow of water. But this is not the main thing.
    On July 30, Muslims celebrate the sacred night of Arafat. I will assume that 80% of the Turks were on the coast. And Ushakov probably knew about it.
    If you look at the map of the Black Sea currents, you can see that walking along the coast from Russia to Bulgaria, leaving the Crimean current, you find yourself in the Rumelian one, which carries you through Cape Kaliakria to the city of Varna, where the Turkish fleet was stationed.
    What is Ushakov doing? : directing with the current and the wind (coincide) the Russian squadron along the coastline, he cuts off the ships from the coast. As a result, the Turks simply do not have time to return from the coast to the ships.
    The Russian flotilla is already going downstream, while the Turks are just beginning to pick up speed. And having the advantage of maneuver and manning of the crews ... You understand yourself.
    So it’s not about “stunning the enemy,” a clear understanding of when (July 31, after the holiday) and how (the Rumelian current).
    I hope it was interesting.
  9. 0
    3 October 2021 18: 20
    Nice, beautiful victory. Only useless. After all, most of the wars with Turkey are unsuccessful attempts at a deliberately unrealizable Greek project, because of which they quarreled so much with the West, with which they should have been friends with all their might. And besides, there is a more practical point. The ordinary Russian people did not receive any visible benefits from the victories over Turkey: the news about them was just as far from common people's life as fairy tales as the biblical legends. As before the war, they spent days on end attacking the master, receiving only contempt in return, so after. Even the soldiers themselves did not receive anything from victories. If in the west, the victorious simple soldier was noticed by high ranks, received titles, awards and had a real opportunity to rise in society, become a rich and respected person, then even if he personally captured the enemy banner, you still remain a peasant-bastard, a beggar and disenfranchised, a serf war. All these factors, as well as the fact that Russian society was very little different from Turkish, the same feudal and serfdom, devalues ​​all victories in all Russian-Turkish wars.