A curfew is imposed on almost all of Afghanistan: the Taliban are taking control of more and more territories

The government in Afghanistan has imposed curfews in all but three provinces to contain the Taliban offensive. It will not operate in Kabul, Panjshir and Nangarhar, and in the remaining 31 provinces, it will start at 10 pm and end at 4:00.

This was reported in local media with reference to an audio appeal to journalists from the representative of the Afghan Interior Ministry, Ahmad Ziya Ziya.

To curb violence and curb Taliban movement *, night curfews have been imposed in 31 provinces across the country

- said in a statement.

The authorities believe that such a measure could restrict the movement of militants of the radical Taliban terrorist movement banned in Russia *.

It has been clear for years that in disputed parts of Afghanistan, the government can control the situation during the day, but the influence of the Taliban increases at night.

- argued the decision of the Afghan government by correspondent of the AL Jazeera agency in Kabul, James Base.

At the same time, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Afghanistan does not report for what period the government of the country imposes restrictions.

The aggravation of the situation in this Central Asian country occurred after US President Joe Biden announced the end of the stay of American troops in Afghanistan. Immediately after this announcement, the Taliban * fighters intensified, launching an offensive in most provinces.

Comments

[Clear]

The aggravation of the situation in this Central Asian country occurred after US President Joe Biden announced the end of the stay of American troops in Afghanistan.

Thank you, old geezer, for this "gift" for Russia. We will never forget it.

[Utes]

To curb violence and curb Taliban movement *, night curfews have been imposed in 31 provinces across the country

As if that would help .. Curfew, for US henchmen? As far as I know, the Amers tried not to get out of their fortress bunkers even during the day ..
At the slightest thing, they called in the air force and wiped out everything around.

Quote: Clear

Thank you, old bastard, for this "gift" for Russia. We will not forget the century.

Well, not exactly a gift, here they have a plan, to send the Taliban to the borders of Russia. I remember the ISIS members were also prepared for this, but the Russians arrived in time and smashed the bearded ones to smithereens. I hope it will be the same with the Taliban! And it would be even better if we came to an agreement with them on the "old friendship". They do not touch our interests on the borders and we do not touch them and in some ways support them. Enough of the war in Afghanistan, it's time to start a peaceful life. They know how to fight and have proven it to the whole world. Let them live as they want, but they follow the rules (no drugs, etc.)

[Clear]

Quote: Utes

Well, not quite a gift, they have a plan here, to send the now Taliban to the borders of Russia

Is it really not clear what is in the quotes "gift"
It's hard to get the Taliban ... to follow the rules

[Utes]

Quote: Clear

Is it really not clear what is in the quotes "gift"

I understood you, in principle, correctly. Clear ..

Quote: Clear

It's hard to get the Taliban ... to follow the rules

Difficult, but possible .. They, too, are tired of fighting And they, Shuravi, remember that we know how to fight and create, teach, etc., too, unlike other “conquerors.”
Maybe we will agree more, to the evil of everyone.

[Clear]

Quote: Utes

Quote: Clear

Is it really not clear what is in the quotes "gift"

I understood you, in principle, correctly. Clear ..

Quote: Clear

It's hard to get the Taliban ... to follow the rules

Difficult, but possible .. They, too, are tired of fighting And they, Shuravi, remember that we know how to fight and create, teach, etc., too, unlike other “conquerors.”
Maybe we will agree more, to the evil of everyone.

Oh, dear, if only so. But memory is one thing, but online financial support against Russia is another. Here's an example, about the memory of the Second World War in Ukraine ...

[Utes]

Quote: Clear

Oh, dear, if only so. But memory is one thing, but online financial support against Russia is another. Here's an example, about the memory of the Second World War in Ukraine ...

I agree ! But we are a nation of creators all the same, and revenge and bombing just is not our level .. For this the West hates us, we bring peace and civilization to the peoples and let us be betrayed .. But still, someone has to do this, such is the mission of Russia But if we get angry, we will sweep everyone out of our way.
Here we live and chew bread.

[Clear]

Quote: Utes

But if we get angry, we will sweep everyone out of our way.

You don't need everyone. It is high time to restore order around Russia (in the post-Soviet space).

[Utes]

Quote: Clear

Quote: Utes

But if we get angry, we will sweep everyone out of our way.

You don't need everyone. It is high time to restore order around Russia (in the post-Soviet space).

This is primarily within the country, especially .. And then too!
We understood each other, Yasnaya..

[Ulrich]

Hover over yourself first, "creators" ...

[Clear]

Quote: Ulrih

Hover over yourself first, "creators" ...

Believe it or not, this is what we will do first.
And, for now, hold a rally, ride, fight, sell the land, take a ride on the road, wash the toilets ...

[Ulrich]

First of all, when?

[Clear]

Quote: Ulrih

First of all, when?

Only cats are kittens at once. Russia, dear man, is one-sixth of the world's landmass. You can not understand

[orionvitt]

Quote: Clear

It's hard to get the Taliban ... to follow the rules

With the Taliban, everything is much simpler. It is practically impossible to force the United States to comply with the rules. Anything you don’t agree on will be thrown anyway.

[Utes]

Quote: orionvitt

With the Taliban, everything is much simpler. It is practically impossible to force the United States to comply with the rules. Anything you don’t agree on will be thrown anyway.

They came to Russia straight away, supposedly to negotiate, and that’s very good...
And we'll see!

[orionvitt]

Quote: Utes

They immediately came to Russia, supposedly to negotiate

Before that, they came to negotiate in the United States. When we were once again convinced that the Americans were incapable of negotiation, we went to Russia. Russia has not yet violated a single treaty, although sometimes it could. For example, in relation to different Ukraine and the rest of the Balts. They generally do not know what it is to fulfill their obligations. The Minsk agreements alone are worth something. What is the pop (America), so is the parish.

[Ulrich]

:) Yes, Russia and before the Union just do the standard of justice and honesty. In general, I never violated any contracts. For example, an agreement that Ukraine will dispose of nuclear weapons and for this Russia guarantees Ukraine the preservation of its borders. To what extent the Balts are so honest .... By the way, remind what treaties Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania violated?

[orionvitt]

Quote: Ulrih

For example, an agreement that Ukraine will dispose of nuclear weapons and for this Russia guarantees Ukraine the preservation of its borders.

For reference. Ukraine did not dispose of nuclear weapons (no opportunity), they were taken to Russia at the insistence of the States first of all. Russia guaranteed Ukraine the safety of its borders as long as Ukraine adhered to its obligations as a neutral country, spelled out in the constitution of 96. After a series of Maidans, when Ukraine wiped its ass with its own constitution and declared that it was taking a course towards NATO, Russia no longer had any obligations towards this country. As for the Baltics, all European conventions and laws were violated there, in relation to the language, rights, etc., of the Russian population. And when they joined the European Union, they pledged to comply with European laws. So what? This is just off the top of my head. If you dig around, you can collect so many "blunders" in these "democracies" that it would be enough for ten volumes. And who in the West gives a damn? No one gives a damn. Here I play, there I don't play, here I wrap fish.

[Clear]

Quote: orionvitt

It is practically impossible to force the United States to comply with the rules.

The US, in every situation and period of time, writes its own rules, which they require everyone to follow.

[Cat Kuzya]

The Taliban will take over the entire territory of Afgan. No one there needs a corrupt secular state with laws and rules incomprehensible to savages. The Taliban's medieval concepts are much simpler, clearer, more familiar and, oddly enough, much more convenient and fairer in the clan-clan structure of society. A secular state is necessary only in a fragmented, selfish, devoid of traditions, religious and moral foundations of a society - like Western democracies.

[Uncle lee]

but at night the influence of the Taliban increases

Or enhance night lighting?
"One lamp in N. prevented as many crimes as all the police departments in a year" - from the reports!

[Utes]

Quote: Uncle Lee

but at night the influence of the Taliban increases

Or enhance night lighting?
"One lamp in N. prevented as many crimes as all the police departments in a year" - from the reports!

Vladimir is a great comment!

[Uncle lee]

Quote: Utes

great comment

I try!

[Babay Atasovich]

There will be inter-clan squabbles, the strongest will win. In order for life to improve, it will be necessary to build a state system so that all clans remain happy. And except for fighting, setting up ambushes, being able to outwit, they can do nothing. Then they will do their usual business and where? Only one option, when even international neutrality will not help. And then again the Russian Federation will have to get involved! No need to be a fortune teller.

[for]

Quote: Kuzya the Cat

more familiar and, oddly enough, much more convenient and fairer in the clan-clan structure of society

You are also a member of the clan, but what about not.

[Snail N9]

It amazes me, not only is the lack of education of many here, a complete lack of the ability to analyze information, but also how they have been imposed in their heads since the days of the "scoop" and the nowadays Kiselevo-Solovyen dung. Kuzya is trying to convey that your "secular" state in Afghanistan and nafig nobody got into trouble because it gives nothing to the individual except for limiting his freedom and tax burden. Personally, I completely agree with this. No, it seems that this is not clear to dead ends. Well, if so, then continue to smoke the "secular state", which is already smoothly flowing into the "digital concentration camp". PS: all of you there in muzzles walk with a distance of 1,5 meters and have already taken root with a QR code? And then - "lowers" for, damn it, "civilized" obshestvo. Are you all prepared for the chips under the withers? Otherwise, the Tereshkovs and the Khinshteins will be unhappy. And the Afghans are savages, how can it be without chips under the withers and without muzzles, a complete lack of "civilization".

[Pechkin]

A secular state is necessary only in a fragmented, selfish, devoid of traditions, religious and moral foundations of a society - like Western democracies.

And you like a clerical state or a theocratic one. I am an atheist quite happy with a secular state. I do not need the priests to tell me what is possible and what is impossible to the extent of their understanding. I'm fine with moral principles and without religion.

[didra]

That is unlikely. A person who has everything in order with "foundations" does not publicly declare this.

[Stas1973]

Afghan in the 60s and 70s lived as a completely secular state with all elements of the generally accepted culture. And girls in short dresses walked around, and the economy was being built in its own way. Look at the photos of those years, go nuts. For the citizens of those years, cave savage and radicalism was a relic of the deep past.

[realist32]

The Americans benefit from the aggravation of the situation - that's a fact. You can't argue with that, but: "Large-scale military exercises of the 201st Russian military base stationed in Tajikistan have begun near the Afghan-Tajik border. The maneuvers are taking place against the backdrop of an offensive by the Taliban group (recognized as a terrorist organization and banned in the Russian Federation), which is pushing back the Afghan government army everywhere. Information about the arrival of Russian troops at the border has caused a reaction in the ranks of the Taliban and their supporters. A lot of messages have appeared on social networks that the Taliban militants are seriously afraid of Russia's intervention in the conflict."- and this is not casual, but ..

[Andrey VOV]

It was not in vain that they conveyed through various channels that not a single bullet would fly into the territory of our embassy ... Although you believe them, this is the case ...

[Andrey VOV]

That curfew of the Taliban smiled ... What a dead poultice ...

[Wahmister 1970]

I read that Dostum called on the government to unite against the Taliban

[Sergey Averchenkov]

As a person who was there, I will say - let them live as they want. The main thing is not to go abroad. And so ... In the afternoon he will be for democracy, and in the evening the spirit. That's all.

[Clear]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

As a person who was there, I will say - let them live as they want. The main thing is not to go abroad. And so ... In the afternoon he will be for democracy, and in the evening the spirit. That's all.

Sooner or later, Russia will have to take sides. It won't be possible to let events in a country next to Russia take their course .

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Your side.

[Pandiurin]

Quote: Clear

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

As a person who was there, I will say - let them live as they want. The main thing is not to go abroad. And so ... In the afternoon he will be for democracy, and in the evening the spirit. That's all.

Sooner or later, Russia will have to take sides. It won't be possible to let events in a country next to Russia take their course .

It is not Russia that will have to take a side. This side (Taliban) will have to orientate correctly)

All neighboring countries are negotiating with the Taliban as the main force in Afghanistan. But the fact that they are the main ones is not enough for the Taliban to take and hold on to power. To put it mildly, no one who negotiates with them is delighted and apparently want some kind of action, such as the inclusion of a large number of representatives of different national groups in the political process in Afghanistan, respectively, a decrease in radicalism, the involvement of neighboring countries for negotiations, etc.

The Taliban are not doing this yet, and so far this too loose movement cannot.

Therefore, while no one will take their side, as long as no one excludes them from the list of terrorists.

As soon as the "side" becomes the right side, we immediately start supporting the right side.
In the meantime, just talk and explain what they lack for correctness.

[Clear]

Quote: Pandiurin

All neighboring countries are negotiating with the Taliban as the main force in Afghanistan.

Yes. In accordance with UN recommendations.

[Going]

At the same time, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Afghanistan does not report for what period the government of the country imposes restrictions.

As long as this government exists, they will act, just what is the use of it.

[Karabin]

the radical terrorist movement Taliban banned in Russia *.

Well, it's like someone

[Snail N9]

Well, yes, Lavrov, who is on friendly terms with the Taliban (if only he had a conscience, like once the "terrorists", then at least the relationship without "pens"), heads the electoral list of the Eat Russia party, and those who, God forbid, registered in Navalny's FBK are extremists and the electoral path is closed to them. All this is disgusting. Double standards are only in the EU, yeah ...

[Prisoner]

Well, now that's it! From 10 pm to 4:00 am the Taliban stay at home. Checkmate.

[Pandiurin]

Apparently the pro-American government is imposing a curfew on the territory that it still controls due to the fact that the Taliban are implementing a plan to seize the center, Kabul. Instead of gradually ousting pro-American forces from large cities on the periphery.