Approximate dates of the first flight tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile from an underwater carrier have been announced

On Naval Day fleet Russia has information about plans to test the Zircon hypersonic missile from an underwater carrier. Recall that a few days earlier, another test of a hypersonic anti-ship missile was carried out on board the newest Russian frigate "Admiral Gorshkov". The missile reportedly successfully hit a target, which was elements of coastal infrastructure. The launch was carried out from a distance of about 350 km.

According to the information service TASS with reference to sources, it is planned to conduct the first flight tests of the Zircon from the board of the nuclear submarine K-560 Severodvinsk. This is the Project 885 Yasen multipurpose nuclear submarine (the lead ship of this project). Previously, this submarine was used to test Russian-designed Kalibr cruise missiles. Submerged launches of Caliber were carried out in 2016. The targets were then hit from a distance of about 600 km.

According to reports, the first flight tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile from the Severodvinsk nuclear submarine are planned to be carried out approximately in August this year. This will be the next stage of flight design tests of the newest Russian weapons, characterized by special speed characteristics.

Earlier, commenting on the tests of "Zircon" in the Russian Federation, foreign media came out with materials that indicate the senselessness of the American missile defense system if Russia has hypersonic missiles. The British press noted that Russia, by equipping its submarines with Zircons, will be able to "threaten Great Britain from the near sea zone." At the same time, it is added that Britain does not have any capabilities to intercept the hypersonic weapons of the Russian Federation.

Comments

[Utes]

So much for the "cartoons", hospoda .. Work in progress!

[Siberian 66]

Well, don't believe the panic of the British media) this is just an information war in action. The firing range is such that it takes a very long walk to reach Britain and get very close to launch. They are not fools in the British Navy, and they are capable of pushing the ASW lines beyond the launch range. And with PLO they are doing very well. Unlike us.

[Utes]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

Well, don't believe the panic of the British media) this is just an information war in action.

Well, at the expense of the British, I don’t know .. But the United States is asking for negotiations, about restrictions, etc.

Quote: Sibiryak 66

The firing range is such that it takes a very long walk to reach Britain and get very close to launch.

Well, this is only the initial stage of testing and the approximate range of defeat .. In order not to scare the "partners" too much ..
There is also the nuclear submarine "Volgograd", a very cunning submarine with the "Poseidons" is being tested .. Well, the "Vanguard", that everything has quieted down, it is definitely on duty ..
Let them catch up and swallow the dust.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Utes

Quote: Sibiryak 66

Well, don't believe the panic of the British media) this is just an information war in action.

Well, at the expense of the British, I don’t know .. But the United States is asking for negotiations, about restrictions, etc.

Quote: Sibiryak 66

The firing range is such that it takes a very long walk to reach Britain and get very close to launch.

Well, this is only the initial stage of testing and the approximate range of defeat .. In order not to scare the "partners" too much ..
There is also the nuclear submarine "Volgograd", a very cunning submarine with the "Poseidons" is being tested .. Well, the "Vanguard", that everything has quieted down, it is definitely on duty ..
Let them catch up and swallow the dust.

Volgograd?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Stalingrad?

[Winnie76]

Quote: SovAr238A

Volgograd?

Either Stalingrad, or Bialystok. Or maybe Svetogorsk

[Utes]

Quote: Winnie76

Quote: SovAr238A

Volgograd?

Either Stalingrad, or Bialystok. Or maybe Svetogorsk

Volgograd ..!

[Alex777]

Belgorod.
B-502 Volgograd was excluded from the fleet in 2000.
K-135 Volgograd disposed of in 2012 ...

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Utes

Quote: Winnie76

Quote: SovAr238A

Volgograd?

Either Stalingrad, or Bialystok. Or maybe Svetogorsk

Volgograd ..!

Don't be stupid ...
Only two submarines have voiced with Poseidon.
Belgorod and Khabarovsk ...

And you, you are just behaving stupidly ...

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

And with PLO they are doing very well.

The "triumph", the apogee, so to speak, of their PLO system was the emergence in the middle of the KPUG order of our PLA 971 project. (other sources claimed that Project 671 PLA surfaced) to transfer the operated soldier to a helicopter to continue treatment at a hospital on the shore ...
And those ooh-ahh when the English press sobbed sobbing that Russian submarines were rubbing against the coast of Albion and would soon begin to enter the Thames.
They have maneuverable ASW forces, but this does not mean at all that they are "doing very well" ...

[Ros 56]

Let's wait and see how it will be in practice.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Ros 56

Let's wait and see how it will be in practice.

If we switched to underwater tests, then the surface tests were successful.

[reserve]

Soyuzmultfilm will soon present a new episode of the cartoon "Well, Wait. Morons, Fuck!"

[Seryoga64]

Earlier, commenting on the tests of "Zircon" in the Russian Federation, foreign media came out with materials that indicate the senselessness of the American missile defense system if Russia has hypersonic missiles. The British press noted that Russia, by equipping its submarines with Zircons, will be able to "threaten Great Britain from the near sea zone." At the same time, it is added that Britain does not have any capabilities to intercept the hypersonic weapons of the Russian Federation.

But on the other hand, our sofa "experts" said that since they did not show how it (the rocket) hit the target, it means that there is no rocket.
No other arguments worked for them.

[1976AG]

Quote: Seryoga64

Earlier, commenting on the tests of "Zircon" in the Russian Federation, foreign media came out with materials that indicate the senselessness of the American missile defense system if Russia has hypersonic missiles. The British press noted that Russia, by equipping its submarines with Zircons, will be able to "threaten Great Britain from the near sea zone." At the same time, it is added that Britain does not have any capabilities to intercept the hypersonic weapons of the Russian Federation.

But on the other hand, our sofa "experts" said that since they did not show how it (the rocket) hit the target, it means that there is no rocket.
No other arguments worked for them.

There is a category of people who will deny with any argument. Well, if they said about the Crimean bridge that it was just a hologram, then they can only be convinced of the reality of Zircon when they come under the blow of this very Zircon.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: 1976AG

There is a category of people who will deny with any arguments

But if it was a US rocket, then there is no doubt about its existence.

[URAL72]

Hit accuracy, trajectory, range - these are the most important secrets of a weapon that allow it to remain effective for a long time. Therefore, when I hear about "cartoons", I clearly see either a meager mind, or the ears of the CIA and others

[Seryoga64]

Quote: URAL72

Hit accuracy, trajectory, range - these are the most important secrets of a weapon that allow it to remain effective for a long time.

[URAL72]

And what have you brought to the post of the mindless profane "Euromaidan"?

[Seryoga64]

Quote: URAL72

And what have you brought to the post of the mindless profane "Euromaidan"?

And besides the fact that we have such on our site.
Well not quite one to one, but very close
Read the comments on testing new weapons.
"Cartoons, this cannot be, they will never do it, the states are still better! Have you encountered?"

[Bez 310]

Quote: Seryoga64

Read the comments on testing new weapons.

Are you an expert in the PKR, or are you just carrying a gag and blindly believe our media?

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Bez 310

blindly believe our media

I do not blindly believe that new types of weapons are actually being tested and put into service in Russia.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Seryoga64

test and put into service new types of weapons

This means that you don't understand anything in the RPC ...
And the point here is that, despite the fact that the Zircon is an anti-ship missile, it has never hit the target ship. So, not everything is as smooth as we would like ...

[carstorm 11]

You found this out during the tests, where am I embarrassed to ask?)))

[Bez 310]

Quote: carstorm 11

You found this out during the tests, where am I embarrassed to ask?)))

I found out this from our media, because otherwise, all the news feeds would be littered with messages about the next victory. Unfortunately, so far the media are silent ...

[carstorm 11]

Those. Do the words secrecy and open data make any difference for you?) There is a test program. It contains some small open information that is given to you. Moreover, it is easy to understand by counting the number of starts and comparing it with the info that you have.

[Bez 310]

Quote: carstorm 11

secrecy

Wononocho ...
Well, now I understand everything!

[carstorm 11]

It's always been that way, and sarcasm looks so-so here.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Bez 310

The Zircon is an anti-ship missile; it has never hit a target ship yet.

Betz 310, well, you're a man with brains ... A critical look at events is indisputably necessary, but not to the same extent. The product is in operation. They are coming LKI, so - be patient, little boy, and you will be happy!
And regarding the shooting at the MC, read:

On October 6, 2020, from the White Sea, the lead frigate of project 22350 "Admiral of the Soviet Union Fleet Gorshkov" fired for the first time a hypersonic cruise missile "Zircon" at a sea target located in the Barents Sea.
According to objective control data, the Zircon hypersonic anti-ship cruise missile direct hit successfully hit a naval target at a distance of 450 km. The rocket's flight speed was more than Mach 8.

And yes ... as far as I know, we have not had a CC since Soviet times ... These are whales who can substitute empty vehicles for DF-21D. And we have a tense situation with transports, you understand ...
Yeah-ahh, here.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

a direct hit successfully hit a naval target

Stationary, with previously known coordinates?
So it's not that ...

[Bez 310]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

We have not had a CC since Soviet times ...

The target ship burns after being hit by the X-22.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Bez 310

Target ship is on fire

Betz, believe me, in 1999 we didn't have a CC!
This is just the NK body, set to the point, standing on the yashka, which is no different from the BKShch

The target ship is a remotely controlled autonomous floating craft under control from the driver ship, or according to a programmed program for the vehicles and steering wheel. L / s is removed from it with RS / TS. For Ams, such a CC looks like this:

As they say, feel the difference.
And the Yankees are very fond of this way to "dispose" of NKs that have served their time.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

The target ship is a remotely controlled autonomous floating craft under control from the driver ship, or according to a programmed program for the vehicles and steering wheel. L / s is removed from it with RS / TS.

Well yes...

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Bez 310

This means that you don't understand anything in the RPC ...

I understand that since I missed it, it means they did not shoot at such targets. The time will come and will be tested on a moving target
"Do not be sad children
Give only a deadline
Will you and squirrel
There will be a whistle "

[mark1]

Quote: Bez 310

and blindly believe our media?

Do you blindly believe?

[Bez 310]

Quote: mark1

Do you blindly believe?

And I am critical of official reports, since we have a new trick - to keep back, distort the facts, and constantly report unfulfilled plans.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Bez 310

since we have a new trick - to keep back, distort the facts, and constantly report unfulfilled plans.

However, this is called PROPAGANDA.
And this "creativity" is intended for the demand of the layman, but not the pros.
Therefore, you need to be above the level of the city sewerage ... in matters of your professional suitability in wartime.
AHA.

[lucul]

Read the comments on testing new weapons.
"Cartoons, this cannot be, they will never do it, the states are still better! Have you encountered?"

Well, what is not clear to you? Only one people can invent - if someone else has invented something - I don't believe it's all fairy tales, cartoons.
It's like with Mendeleev - we have the Periodic Table of Mendeleev, and there - just the Periodic Table, because Mendeleev is of a different nationality.

[Vladimir Rostovsky]

Read the comments on testing new weapons.
"Cartoons, this cannot be, they will never do it, the states are still better! Have you encountered?"

Maybe people think so because there is a reason? And they see on the one hand - the United States is the first economy in the world, the GDP is an order of magnitude higher than the GDP of other countries, there is Silicon Valley, there are breakthrough companies and products that dominate the world: Apple, Intel, AMR, Google, SpaceX, etc., big money is spinning there and scientists from all over the world go there to work or work remotely, plus a citation rating in scientific journals, the number of patents and Nobel laureates, the number of industrial robots per 10000 people, etc. On the other hand, Russia. And, what is most sad, even if Russia launches Zircon into mass production, the situation will repeat itself as with the F-35 - dozens of our missiles against a thousand of them.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: Vladimir Rostovsky

dozens of our missiles against thousands of them.

So what? Why 1000 missiles?
Yes, all the same, the ameriga will NEVER fight with us, because they are well aware that they themselves will get the best of it.

[Captain45]

Quote: URAL72

Hit accuracy, trajectory, range - these are the most important secrets of a weapon that allow it to remain effective for a long time.

When I read heart-rending screams in the comments that they say nothing is indicated, but not shown, I always want, as in the film "Adjutant of His Excellency", to ask the questioners - "Pavel Yuryevich, are you a spy?"

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Seryoga64

But on the other hand, our sofa "experts" said that since they did not show how it (the rocket) hit the target, it means that there is no rocket.

For that they "passionately love" Russia .. Like - "We will destroy the whole world (Russia) of violence, to the core!" Why ????

[Seryoga64]

Quote: 30 vis

That's why they "passionately love" Russia ..

It turns out that if I believe that Russia is a Great Power, I am "Hurray patriot", and they hate everything that happens in our country "Kaput patriots"

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Seryoga64

It turns out that if I believe that Russia is a Great Power

It turns out like this.

[Seryoga64]

Quote: 30 vis

It turns out like this.

Well then it means

and they are hating everything that happens "Kaput patriots"

[Troll]

IMHO, these are not "flight" tests, these are tests of launch systems from submarines. Bo in the sky Zircon is already flying))

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Troll

IMHO, these are not "flight" tests, these are tests of launch systems from submarines. Bo in the sky Zircon already flies))

And not only. Apparently, the system for receiving and entering firing data is being checked. submerged boat. Well, and of course, the underwater launch system. Although, judging by the video of the launch of Onyx / Caliber, there should be no problems with the UKSK. And yet, who knows exactly what needs to be "expanded" there !?

[tralflot1832]

Now, let's see first a surface launch or an underwater launch at once. The technology of launching from under water is probably different from a surface launch.

[Jacket in stock]

The technology of launching rockets from under water has long been developed.
The actual rocket too.
Here it remains only to check the complete system.
We wish the designers success.

[Zaurbek]

If it is launched from a standard cell, then, probably, it can be put on the coastal anti-ship missiles complexes? Which Onyxes shoot.

[Alex777]

No precise information has yet come across, but there is an inner confidence that it is possible.
It will be both right and very good.
And everyone in the Black Sea will calm down, and we will rearm the Cliff in the Crimea (there have already been rumors), and the Yapas will be quieter.

[Nikolaevich I]

According to reports, the first flight tests of the Zircon hypersonic missile from the Severodvinsk nuclear submarine are planned to be carried out approximately in August this year. This will be the next stage in the flight design tests of the latest Russian weapons, which are distinguished by special speed characteristics.
Wow, times! Eh, moments! But once they sang: "You will be a radio operator ... (and a pilot in your soul!) ... you will fly with a whistle, backwards!" ...

[aszzz888]

Moreover, it is added that Britain there is no way to intercept the Russian Federation's hypersonic weapons.

Drain the water, and sushi paddles!

[Keer]

Well, in Britain, ordinary, old-school, ballistic, vintage. Boris don’t worry.