American Edition: International Success of the Checkmate Fighter Not Guaranteed

62

Russia presented a new fifth-generation single-engine fighter developed by Sukhoi, organizing a wide advertising campaign. However, despite this, the success of the Russian fighter in the international market is not guaranteed, the author of the article for the American magazine The National Interest Sebastian Roblen is sure.

Russia has launched an extensive advertising campaign ahead of the show of its new promising fighter. To create excitement, Russian Rostec released a series of videos in which a number of countries are shown as potential buyers, in particular India, Argentina, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam and others. During the presentation of the aircraft, it was announced that the fighter was designed for export deliveries and Russia was awaiting numerous applications for the aircraft.



However, not everything is as planned by Russia, writes Roblen. Firstly, the fighter itself is not yet available and there is no certainty that it will take off at all. To go from a mock-up to a real plane, you need government funding or foreign investment. In the author's opinion, Moscow relies on heavy aircraft and may not find money for a light fighter.

Secondly, he writes, even taking into account the development of the Su-57, the development of Checkmate is unlikely to go quickly and will be cheap. And taking into account the workload of the production lines of the Su-35, Su-57 and Su-34M, the new fighter will need to build a separate line, and this is an additional cost.

In addition, according to Roblen, in order to bring the new fighter to the international market, and Russia intends to sell at least 300 aircraft, Moscow will have to “bow down” to the United States so that Washington does not put a spoke in the wheel by imposing sanctions against potential buyers.

On the other hand, if Russia can turn its development into a full-fledged fighter and it meets the declared parameters, then Checkmate will become commercially attractive and outstrip its potential competitors in the international market, sums up Roblen.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    62 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      23 July 2021 10: 37
      If the United States itself does not use the techniques of unhealthy competition, then everything will be normal ...
      1. +11
        23 July 2021 10: 49
        readers of the leading Japanese publication not only noted the excellent characteristics of the new Russian fighter, but also suggested in the comments that "the Russian Checkmate F-35 will just do it!" cheap Russian.
        1. +9
          23 July 2021 11: 11
          This Sebastian Roblen seems to have found his arguments on Topwar. laughing
          1. +5
            23 July 2021 11: 41
            To go from a mock-up to a real plane, you need government funding or foreign investment. "

            I already wrote that the new fighter will consist of 90% ready-made (or almost finished) components and assemblies of the Su-57 and S-70. Even the software will be largely taken from them. The costs will not be high, and foreign investment is not needed. But we, as usual, have recently sold the assembly license to someone, and to someone we will offer to participate in the project for a little money. I think the transparent hints of the UAE are not casual. No, this is a very lucrative project, unlike the Su-57. He actually will help to recoup funds for the development of the Su-57 and even the Hunter. First of all, this concerns the engine and weapons, communications, on-board computers, OLS, etc.
            1. +3
              23 July 2021 11: 52
              I agree with you on the whole.
              I will clarify the details a little:
              - whatever the costs of developing a new aircraft based on the existing groundwork, financial assistance from the outside only speeds up the process, and since the process is surprisingly quiet and fast, I can assume that there was financial assistance.
              - Of course, no one will speak out loud about financial aid, but the Indians recently ordered a MiG-29K / KUB, which greatly surprised me.
              - I don't know how profitable the project will be, but if everything goes according to plan with the characteristics, terms and price, it will be very difficult for the States to stop its progress.
              hi
              1. +1
                23 July 2021 12: 06
                I haven’t heard of the shipbuilders yet, but it’s clear about financial help. Only it is needed not so much for development as for the construction of test vehicles. Even the AL-41F is already approaching $ 5 million, but perhaps this is an export price.
                1. +1
                  23 July 2021 12: 09
                  I read about this on the run today. The preparation of this purchase seems to have been going on for a long time.
                  “The Russian side has received from its Indian partners a preliminary request for the supply of MiG-29K / KUB carrier-based fighters. Relevant proposals have been sent ”, - quotes the director of FSMTC TASS.
                  .... on Wednesday, Russia sent India a commercial offer for the supply of 21 MiG-29 fighters. In early February, the deputy director of the FSMTC, Vladimir Drozhzhov, reported that India had decided to purchase 21 MiG-29 fighters from Russia. India also approved the modernization of the 59 MiG-29s of the country's Air Force worth more than $ 984 million.

                  https://vz.ru/news/2021/7/23/1110394.html
            2. 0
              23 July 2021 11: 54
              Quote: URAL72
              I already wrote that the new fighter will consist of 90% ready-made (or almost finished) components and assemblies of the Su-57 and S-70. Even the software will be largely taken from them.


              Are you the chief designer?
              Usually, someone who says "it will be easy", or does not understand the question well, or is openly lying.
              Because even linking ready-made components in one glider is not a task for five years of work.
              1. 0
                23 July 2021 12: 13
                I did not say that it will be easy and free, and even right tomorrow. I said that they will take full advantage of the developments of the new machines, and this will significantly reduce the cost and speed up the development. Actually, this was said on the first day at the presentation by the heads of the Sukhoi Design Bureau.
      2. +10
        23 July 2021 10: 53
        Well, how can you seriously talk about such topics? Possibly in 6-7 years, when this machine, having passed all stages of testing, will be ready for mass production in the world, there will be such an ass that new equipment will be bought by everyone and for any money. Or maybe, on the contrary, there will be detente and the world military-industrial complex will decline like in the 90s. Can you calculate this?
        1. +1
          23 July 2021 17: 23
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          Well, how can you seriously talk about such topics?

          I agree . It's hard to plan. The Situation Changes Rapidly Instantly. And an ordinary person cannot dream for more than three days.
        2. +2
          23 July 2021 19: 24
          Possible ...
          ===
          Thumbs up good
      3. +7
        23 July 2021 10: 54
        Quote: Alexey-74
        Unless the United States itself uses the techniques of unhealthy competition,

        And competition cannot be healthy or not healthy.
        It just exists, and everyone uses the methods that are available to them. Why would America be the hegemon if it doesn't take advantage of it?
        1. -1
          23 July 2021 11: 07
          Quote: Jacket in stock
          And competition cannot be healthy or not healthy.
          It just exists, and everyone uses the methods that are available to them.

          Those. Do you think that the days of the "Wild West" have not passed and the one with the "longer" Colt is right? winked

          Actually, there is the WTO, in which Russia is a member, where there are rules governing international trade, including "competition". Do not buy Russian intimidation of countries, otherwise you will not be good, probably not among such rules.
          1. +9
            23 July 2021 11: 12
            Quote: Kurare
            Those. Do you think that the days of the "Wild West" have not passed and the one with the "longer" Colt is right?

            Do you think that such times are already in the past?
            Quote: Kurare
            In fact, there is the WTO, which Russia is also a member of, where there are rules governing international trade, including fair competition.

            Well, did the WTO accession help the Russian Federation a lot?
            1. +8
              23 July 2021 11: 14
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              Do you think that such times are already in the past?

              Unfortunately, and I must admit, they do come back.
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              Well, did the WTO accession help the Russian Federation a lot?

              IMHO, no, it didn't help. The WTO is like a pivot, where the United States is turned, and there it went.
              1. +4
                23 July 2021 11: 24
                Quote: Kurare
                Unfortunately, and I must admit, they do come back.

                Yes, they did not go anywhere, who is stronger and right. The USSR was incommensurably stronger than the Russian Federation and the same could act from a position of strength, including. The Russian Federation cannot afford this with impunity.
                1. +2
                  23 July 2021 11: 28
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  The USSR was incommensurably stronger than the Russian Federation and the same could act from a position of strength, including.

                  The USSR could act from a position of strength - yes. But simply to violate the terms of the organization that governs commercial relations is not. This is the point: there are rules, but the United States doesn't give a damn about them.
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  The Russian Federation cannot afford this with impunity.

                  I agree, it cannot, as long as it follows these rules and is a member of the WTO.
                  1. +3
                    23 July 2021 11: 39
                    Quote: Kurare
                    This is the point: there are rules, but the United States does not care about them.

                    It's not about the United States, it's about the system of capitalist relations. Before the USA, there was Britain, etc.
                    Quote: Kurare
                    I agree, it cannot, as long as it follows these rules and is a member of the WTO.

                    I don't know the benefits of being a member of this organization. While the Russian Federation is a cap country, its place is only in the vestibule, and not in the compartment car.
                    1. 0
                      23 July 2021 11: 51
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      It's not about the United States, it's about the system of capitalist relations. Before the USA, there was Britain, etc.

                      Yes and no. Such actions without rules can backfire for the "hegemons" themselves. The same Britain is an example of this. There must be rules and they must be followed. Otherwise, it will be the "wild west" with all its consequences.
                      1. +6
                        23 July 2021 12: 43
                        Quote: Kurare
                        There must be rules and they must be followed. Otherwise, it will be the "wild west" with all its consequences.

                        The only restraining factor today is nuclear weapons, there are no other factors. Two world wars have shown this. The League of Nations did not cope, and the UN does not cope either, only the fear of mutual destruction can cope, unfortunately. There are countries that "write the rules" and there are countries that obey the rules. There is no "equality", but it probably never happened, no matter how regrettable it is.
                        1. -1
                          23 July 2021 12: 47
                          Quote: aleksejkabanets
                          The only restraining factor today is nuclear weapons, there are no other factors.

                          It's right. But it can be brought to such an extent that there will be no other choice other than WAR.

                          Historical example: Japan and the United States before the attack on Pearl Harbor. The Japanese knew very well that they would most likely lose, but they took this step, since the United States had pressed them seriously.
                        2. +2
                          23 July 2021 13: 56
                          Quote: Kurare
                          It's right. But it can be brought to such an extent that there will be no other choice other than WAR.

                          And besides, everything slowly rolls down, which I don't like at all.
                        3. 0
                          23 July 2021 17: 27
                          Quote: aleksejkabanets
                          There are countries that "write the rules" and there are countries that obey the rules. There is no "equality", but it probably never happened, no matter how regrettable it is.

                          So people began to behave similarly. How can you encourage decency and educate children in this spirit? You don't have to answer. Unanswered question. And still it is necessary to instill decency in children.
          2. 0
            23 July 2021 11: 14
            Quote: Kurare

            Those. Do you think that the days of the "Wild West" have not passed and the one with the "longer" Colt is right?

            Don't you think so?
            Quote: Kurare
            Actually, there is the WTO, in which Russia is a member, where there are rules governing international trade, including "competition". Do not buy Russian intimidation of countries, otherwise you will not be good, probably not among such rules.

            Yah?
            And when did they listen to this WTO? Is that when they themselves had to bend someone.
            1. +2
              23 July 2021 11: 16
              Quote: Jacket in stock
              Don't you think so?

              See my post above, answer alekseykabanets
      4. +6
        23 July 2021 10: 57
        Quote: Alexey-74
        If the United States itself does not use the techniques of unhealthy competition, then everything will be normal ...

        Basically, the author has already answered this question:
        ... Moscow will have to "bow down" to the United States so that Washington does not put a spoke in its wheels, imposing sanctions against potential buyers

        So, further confrontation due to unfair competition is guaranteed. Only the author is not right in the fact that someone will "bow down" in the United States.
        1. +2
          23 July 2021 11: 01
          "Firstly Secondly" ... Musolate am ...

          So immediately write that THIRD , introduce sanctions against potential buyers ...
    2. 0
      23 July 2021 10: 37
      So we have not yet seen how it flies. Yes, and have not yet asked permission from the United States to build such an aircraft.
      1. +12
        23 July 2021 10: 50
        Let's wait for the flying instance ..
    3. 0
      23 July 2021 10: 39
      American Edition: International Success of the Checkmate Fighter Not Guaranteed
      It is strange, of course, but the topic "plays" from different sides ... at least in the media space.
      Here you go.
      1. +3
        23 July 2021 11: 49
        If there is buzz and talk already the beginning of success, how is the first step, and then what? then you have to plow and plow ...
        1. +1
          23 July 2021 12: 21
          Time will tell what will happen and how.
          1. +3
            23 July 2021 18: 27
            I really want the product to happen, as announced ...
    4. +1
      23 July 2021 10: 45
      Well, the American Roblen made fun! laughing At first they assured that it was their idea, now they hysterically assure that: there is no fighter, it will not fly, Moscow has no money for development, it is impossible to make it fast and cheap. And in general, in order to sell a fighter jet, Russia will have to ask permission from the United States! laughing laughing laughing
      1. +1
        23 July 2021 11: 07
        Moscow will have to "bow down" to the United States,
        Or maybe not! "Permitters"! Damn burnt .....
    5. -2
      23 July 2021 10: 45
      It flies, and then we'll see, it won't, striped stars in an asterisk are running in front of the locomotive, as always, they can't hear their mongrels yet, they can't think of anything new.
    6. -3
      23 July 2021 10: 51
      Roblen was at the Sukhoi plant in Komsomolsk on the Amur, which talks about the workload of the lines. I suspect that the theory of low volume is a publicized bullshit, which gives the plane + $ 40-60 million in added value. And the plane can also be painted with two-component polymer-based paint. ( Back in 1986, he painted the workbench with such paint, on a dispute with three hammer blows, no one could beat off the paint) And the electronics can be installed from 4 +++.
    7. -2
      23 July 2021 10: 56
      The USA is already starting to swell from unhealthy competition ... Checkmate!
    8. 0
      23 July 2021 10: 57
      That success is not guaranteed is clear without it.
      You can't huddle a client lying on the stove, you have to work, work and work ...
      And the engineers will have to work to make the car fly, and the sellers to please the buyer, and the diplomats to bypass the sanctions.
    9. +2
      23 July 2021 11: 04
      Envy silently ... Yes
    10. -3
      23 July 2021 11: 05
      This is the difference between modern Russia and the USSR - capitalist countries from socialist countries.
      Previously, all products for the country's defense were secret. Today, on the contrary, "the hen is in the nest," and they already want to trade in its chickens. Trade above secrets. negative
      1. +2
        23 July 2021 11: 12
        Quote: askort154
        Previously, all products for the country's defense were secret

        Well, why, most of the characteristics of the Su-57 are still classified. And the new "ShahMat", as it was announced, is being ordered by one of the countries, i.e. should initially be a commercial project.
      2. -4
        23 July 2021 11: 17
        Quote: askort154
        Previously, all products for the country's defense were secret. On the contrary today

        And who said that this is for the defense of our country?
        And even before, secrets were only from their citizens. When delivering abroad, what kind of secrecy can there be?
      3. -2
        23 July 2021 11: 42
        The development itself was secret, and when the product was already in metal and in a series, it was exhibited at a parade or at an exhibition. And they never boasted about layouts.
        1. 0
          23 July 2021 12: 57
          Quote: Alex_You
          ... And they never boasted about layouts.

          Yah?
          And what did they ride on Red Square?
          Sometimes mock-ups of missiles that don't even exist.
      4. +1
        23 July 2021 11: 50
        Quote: askort154
        This is the difference between modern Russia and the USSR - capitalist countries from socialist countries.
        Previously, all products for the country's defense were secret.

        AND? What was the joy from this ??
        We collected AK-74 shells one by one - and Soldier of Fortune burned them with zinc for 7-8 years before ..
        "Jane" knew all the performance characteristics of our ships long before launching ...
        1. +1
          23 July 2021 12: 32
          Quote: your1970
          We collected liners from the AK-74 piece by piece

          So in each unit there was an annual plan for the collection of ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metal, which is why they collected the shells. Moreover, they also reported on how many percent the annual plan was fulfilled - this is all routine work in Soviet times, and has nothing to do with secrecy.
          1. 0
            23 July 2021 15: 54
            Quote: ccsr
            So in each unit there was an annual plan for the collection of ferrous and non-ferrous scrap metal, which is why they collected the shells.
            - in fact, the AK-74's liners are steel and the weight is penny. It was easier to hand over with some kind of truck - than not letting go to sleep for three days l / s combing the shooting range because of 1 (one !!!) liner ...
            The officer corps blamed on secrecy
            1. 0
              23 July 2021 18: 43
              Quote: your1970
              - than for three days not to let sleep l / s combing the shooting range because of 1 (one !!!) cartridge case ...

              I don't really believe in this, except for the special forces, where they used special cartridges for silent shooting.
              Quote: your1970
              The officer corps blamed on secrecy

              What kind of secrecy is there - just someone let go of such a version so as not to relax.
    11. 0
      23 July 2021 11: 06
      The main thing is that it would be guaranteed in battle. The rest will follow.
      1. -3
        23 July 2021 11: 19
        Quote: Captive
        The main thing is to be guaranteed in battle

        We don’t care what he is like in battle. It is initially made for sale, and what the buyer will do with it, send it into battle, to a parade, or will carry potatoes, it makes no difference to us.
    12. +1
      23 July 2021 11: 40
      On the other hand, if Russia can turn its development into a full-fledged fighter and it meets the declared parameters, then Checkmate will become commercially attractive and outstrip its potential competitors in the international market, sums up Roblen.


      Confused myself ... lol
    13. 0
      23 July 2021 11: 44
      And who knows, striped trandychikh?
    14. +6
      23 July 2021 15: 11
      The adversary began to fuss!
      So everything is being done correctly.
    15. 0
      23 July 2021 17: 44
      in any case, we and amers have their own countries, buyers, NATO will not buy
    16. -2
      23 July 2021 18: 24
      Goose: I like that chicken.
      Fox: They won't be happy about the goose in the chicken coop.
    17. -1
      23 July 2021 20: 32
      Moscow will have to "bow down" to the United States so that Washington does not put a spoke in its wheels by imposing sanctions on potential buyers.


      in any weapon, the main thing is its efficiency, reliability + operating costs (in relation to aviation, this is the same cost of a flight hour) and if it is at the level, then no sticks in the ears will force buyers to abandon the aircraft. But even Turkey bought the complex, not to mention India and China. In general, everyone bought the S-400 to whom Moscow sold it.
    18. -1
      23 July 2021 21: 30
      Let them envy in silence.
      And not pouring bile.
      And contributing your misinformation.
      Although theirs squabbles like free advertising.
      The potential client will touch, check and make the right choice anyway.
    19. 0
      23 July 2021 21: 48
      Quote: ccsr
      Quote: your1970
      - than for three days not to let sleep l / s combing the shooting range because of 1 (one !!!) cartridge case ...

      I don't really believe in this, except for the special forces, where they used special cartridges for silent shooting.
      Quote: your1970
      The officer corps blamed on secrecy

      What kind of secrecy is there - just someone let go of such a version so as not to relax.

      There was such a period with the AK-47 / AKM, it was worn in cases, they collected ammunition after firing from AK and SKS, then it was the same when the first AK-74 appeared, but with 74 it did not last long.
      It all depends on how old the writer was, when and where he served, in some districts the madhouse lasted longer.
    20. 0
      23 July 2021 21: 51
      Quote: cniza
      On the other hand, if Russia can turn its development into a full-fledged fighter and it meets the declared parameters, then Checkmate will become commercially attractive and outstrip its potential competitors in the international market, sums up Roblen.


      Confused myself ... lol

      He insured himself. The article is written in such a way that in any case the author will look like a "visionary", but the article is generally superficial. Data on market capacity for future decades, markets, countries and the age of their air force fleet are not given, there is no analysis and conclusions.
      Everything is very superficial, "at a gallop through Europe".
    21. -1
      23 July 2021 22: 31
      In addition, according to Roblen, in order to bring the new fighter to the international market, and Russia intends to sell at least 300 aircraft, Moscow will have to “bow down” to the United States so that Washington does not put a spoke in the wheel by imposing sanctions against potential buyers.
      It looks like Roblen did not hear anything about Turkey, or about the S-400 purchased by her.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"