Military Review

Western press: China takes Afghanistan seriously

53

The Western press says that China is "taking Afghanistan seriously." For the PRC, stability in the Central Asian region is especially important, given that Beijing continues to build the "One Belt - One Road" project. The Chinese authorities intend to prevent an escalation in Afghanistan in order to be able to use the advantageous geographical position of Afghanistan in the interests of their project.


The PRC Foreign Ministry reported that an experienced diplomat Yue Xiaoyong was appointed to the post of special envoy for Afghanistan to assist Afghanistan in the process of resolving the situation. This diplomat has rich experience of contacts both in Asia and in the West. It is known that at one time Yue Xiaoyong was the ambassador of China to countries such as Ireland, Jordan and Qatar.

Against this background, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited Tajikistan, where active hostilities have been taking place in the past few weeks. Wang Yi discussed the Afghan conflict with the Tajik leadership, noting that the Afghan direction is one of the priority issues for the Chinese authorities. At the same time, support was promised to Tajikistan.

The West notes that in connection with the threat of penetration of militants from Afghanistan into Chinese territory, Beijing has increased its military presence on the borders with this country. Several additional units were reportedly deployed there, and the PLA is actively monitoring the situation from the air.
Photos used:
PRC Ministry of Defense
53 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 22 July 2021 09: 31
    +3
    Well, yes, having a long common border with this troubled country, could China stay on the sidelines and not make an attempt at least to strengthen its forces on the border
    1. shrus79
      shrus79 22 July 2021 09: 39
      +3
      Not confused with Pakistan? China has a much shorter border with Afghanistan, and it is very mountainous.
      1. NDR-791
        NDR-791 22 July 2021 09: 47
        +3
        Quote: shrus79
        Not confused with Pakistan? China has a much shorter border with Afghanistan, and it is very mountainous.

        Who cares? There, everyone tensed. We do not have a common border with Afgan, and we are concerned about it. And China has nothing to fear for Pakistan. They have been at home there for a long time.
        1. NIKN
          NIKN 22 July 2021 10: 09
          +3
          Judging by the photo in China, the Yeti is already being called up for service, a serious opponent laughing
          1. Lynx2000
            Lynx2000 22 July 2021 10: 19
            +1
            Quote: NIKNN
            Judging by the photo in China, the Yeti is already being called up for service, a serious opponent laughing

            what It seems to me that the photo in the article has nothing to do with China, but is most likely an advertising poster for the "Ghillie suit" catalog.
      2. skif8013
        skif8013 22 July 2021 09: 48
        +2
        Quote: shrus79
        Not confused with Pakistan? China has a much shorter border with Afghanistan, and it is very mountainous.

        And the Taliban do not give a shit about mountains or plains, they will climb into any crevice if they need it. China is reacting quite rightly. We do not have a common border with Avganistan, and then we are strengthening our troops on the border with them.
        1. Doliva63
          Doliva63 22 July 2021 15: 56
          +2
          "We do not have a common border with Avganistan, and then we are strengthening our troops on the border with them." ...
          Eck vodka had an effect on me in the heat! belay Or did you really write that? wassat
          1. skif8013
            skif8013 22 July 2021 16: 04
            +1
            Quote: Doliva63
            "We do not have a common border with Avganistan, and then we are strengthening our troops on the border with them." ...
            Eck vodka had an effect on me in the heat! belay Or did you really write that? wassat

            201 military bases in Tajikistan. Learn materiel.
            1. Doliva63
              Doliva63 22 July 2021 16: 10
              +5
              Quote: skif8013
              Quote: Doliva63
              "We do not have a common border with Avganistan, and then we are strengthening our troops on the border with them." ...
              Eck vodka had an effect on me in the heat! belay Or did you really write that? wassat

              201 military bases in Tajikistan. Learn materiel.

              I’m in order with the materiel, but you’re not very good with the Russian language. And yes, Avganistan is spelled with "f" - Afghanistan.
      3. svp67
        svp67 22 July 2021 10: 13
        0
        Quote: shrus79
        China has a much shorter border with Afghanistan and is heavily mountainous.

        And nevertheless, it is on the Chinese side just the "restless" region inhabited by Muslims.
        And for the local mountains are not a hindrance
      4. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 23 July 2021 17: 32
        0
        Quote: shrus79
        China's border with Afghanistan is much shorter

        Less, to put it mildly, there is at least 50 km.
      5. TermNachTer
        TermNachTer 24 July 2021 09: 39
        0
        Here are packs and need to worry. In addition to Waziristan in the northern part, they have funny guys in the western part - Baluchis, who believe that apart from Islamabad, they will be better)))
      6. Serge-667
        Serge-667 24 July 2021 16: 21
        0
        So Pakistan recognizes the Taliban. Friends and brothers.
    2. Hypertension
      Hypertension 22 July 2021 09: 43
      -5
      Quote: svp67
      could China stay on the sidelines and not make an attempt at least to strengthen its forces on the border

      China is now chopping off some pieces of land on the sly of Tajikistan. Naturally under the pretext of protection. Like: if we hadn't taken control of this land, the Taliban would have done it *
      1. Igor_9
        Igor_9 22 July 2021 09: 50
        +1
        They don't care, China does not exchange for trifles, there are much more serious questions.
        1. Hypertension
          Hypertension 22 July 2021 09: 55
          -2
          Quote: Igor_9
          China does not exchange for trifles

          Firstly: it will be a side goal (a la trifle, but nice), and secondly: the entire periodic table is in the mountains of Tajikistan. It's not easy to mine, but resources are resources.
          1. Baloo
            Baloo 22 July 2021 10: 11
            +1
            Quote: Hyperion
            Firstly: it will be a side goal (a la trifle, but nice), and secondly: the entire periodic table is in the mountains of Tajikistan. It's not easy to mine, but resources are resources.

            good And we know little about the bowels of Afghanistan. For example, before the Americans climbed into Afghanistan, a huge gas field was discovered on the territory of Turkmenistan, a third passing into the territory of Afghanistan.
            1. Nycteaph
              Nycteaph 22 July 2021 21: 43
              +3
              The bowels of Afghanistan have huge deposits of rare earth metals, almost more than in China itself. There is an opinion that it was for them that the United States climbed there, because now they buy all their rare earth metals from China.
    3. Finches
      Finches 22 July 2021 09: 43
      +2
      Beijing has already invested $ 70 billion in the Pakistani economy to cut a corridor to the port of Gwadar, from which Chinese cargo will continue to go to Africa, the Middle East and Europe. Therefore, China is vitally interested in a calm Afghanistan!
    4. Serhi
      Serhi 22 July 2021 13: 37
      +4
      What is the long border between China and Afghanistan? Geography is a useful subject. China has the smallest border with Afghanistan at just 91 km. There are other interests, not border protection.
  2. prior
    prior 22 July 2021 09: 38
    +1
    There is no doubt that China will "build" all the Central Asian countries.
    He does not need a mess on the "Great Silk Road".
    China does not have the means and desire in this.
  3. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 22 July 2021 09: 40
    +1
    Nobody needs a restless neighbor
  4. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 22 July 2021 09: 44
    +4
    I wish our Chinese friends good luck in the fight. Our experience has taught them nothing. They fought for the "motor sich" ... They also have a certificate.)
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 22 July 2021 10: 12
      +1
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      They also have a certificate.

      laughing good
    2. Andobor
      Andobor 22 July 2021 19: 49
      +1
      Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
      They fought for the "motor sich" ... They also have a certificate.)

      For hundreds of years, eunuchs have been engaged in foreign policy in China, without eggs, with such a mentality nothing but a wall works, outside of China they can only trade, they can trade ...
    3. TermNachTer
      TermNachTer 24 July 2021 09: 44
      +1
      The question about "Motor" remained open. The representative office of the People's Republic of China, on the 8th floor of the plant management, is functioning properly. So don't jump to conclusions. In terms of tidying up, the Chinese can provide the necessary level of atrocity to convince even die-hard guys like the Taliban.
      1. akarfoxhound
        akarfoxhound 24 July 2021 17: 55
        0
        And where was this representative office supposed to go from the factory? Or should they, having hit the bags of dough, forgive everyone and immediately leave the enterprise?
  5. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 22 July 2021 09: 47
    0
    So the Americans want China to get involved in Afghanistan. Let's wait for what China will officially say.
  6. Igor_9
    Igor_9 22 July 2021 09: 48
    0
    No, well, let China try, until no one has a dare to put things in order there.
  7. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 22 July 2021 09: 50
    +2
    ***
    And good luck for many years ...
    ***
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 22 July 2021 11: 53
      +1
      ***
      Long road, but moonlit night ...
      ***
  8. U-58
    U-58 22 July 2021 10: 40
    0
    And thank God. China with its huge finances will be able to at least buy peace in Afghanistan
  9. Serhi
    Serhi 22 July 2021 13: 50
    0
    The British Empire tried in the 18-19th century and did not achieve anything there, the USSR tried it in the 20th century and it did not lead to anything good, the USA tried as unsuccessfully as others go away. China can try to invest money, but I think they will not bring in troops, they already understand how this could end.
  10. Cat
    Cat 22 July 2021 19: 21
    +1
    China "Takes Afghanistan Seriously"

    Who hasn't been to Afghanistan yet?
  11. Pandiurin
    Pandiurin 22 July 2021 19: 38
    0
    So many articles with "About Horror Horror" Afghanistan is a huge problem for ...
    - China, he will have to send troops.
    - Russia, we will have to send troops.
    - for Tajikistan, Uzbekistan ... they need to accept refugees who previously worked for the CIA and place the CIA and a military base with US aircraft.
    - Pakistan, the problem is not clear, but the Americans also want to get in ...

    For some reason, all the countries adjacent to Afghanistan are considered separately with this problem. Although it is logical that if this is a common problem for all neighboring countries:
    China, Russia, Central Asian republics, Pakistan, Iran.
    Many are members of the CSTO, SCO, all these countries have no contradictions, there is a history of friendly relations, at present they call each other strategic partners, etc.

    The interests in Afghanistan are often the same: the absence of hostilities, the absence of influence from the West, Turkey and the Saudis, a gradual solution to the drug trade problem, ideally the participation of Afghanistan in transport projects, mining, etc.

    It is logical to assume that Afghanistan will be decided JOINT by all neighboring countries, and agreed.

    And this is a different alignment, as if each country acted separately against the opposition of other neighboring countries.

    But I have not yet met such an analysis, why no one is considering the most obvious logical and effective solution ...
    1. dauria
      dauria 24 July 2021 10: 51
      +1
      why no one considers that most obvious logical and effective solution ...


      Probably because it is not the most logical. There is no country as such. There are not even roads connecting parts of the territory. It is impossible to govern either Faizabad, Herat or Kandahar from Kabul. Each appanage prince is his own power. They live as they can, by and large they do not have the strength to harm anyone. The piece is attractive only from the point of view of superpowers. The United States would have an unsinkable aircraft carrier against Iran and China, and earlier against the USSR. The USSR did not want to give such an opportunity to the United States. China, too, would not hurt to "settle" there.
      Afghan itself is not needed by anyone and is not interesting along with the "babakhs", donkeys, camels, lapis lazuli and the poor population. Why would the international community care about them more than, for example, Angola, or South Africa, or whoever is starving?
      1. Pandiurin
        Pandiurin 24 July 2021 12: 51
        +1
        Quote: dauria
        why no one considers that most obvious logical and effective solution ...


        Probably because it is not the most logical. There is no country as such. There are not even roads connecting parts of the territory. It is impossible to govern either Faizabad, Herat or Kandahar from Kabul. Each appanage prince is his own power. They live as they can, by and large they do not have the strength to harm anyone. The piece is attractive only from the point of view of superpowers. The United States would have an unsinkable aircraft carrier against Iran and China, and earlier against the USSR. The USSR did not want to give such an opportunity to the United States. China, too, would not hurt to "settle" there.
        Afghan itself is not needed by anyone and is not interesting along with the "babakhs", donkeys, camels, lapis lazuli and the poor population. Why would the international community care about them more than, for example, Angola, or South Africa, or whoever is starving?


        Now, yes, Afghanistan does not represent a single state, if the Taliban take power or represent a large part of the Afghan government, then it is also unlikely that power from the center will be projected into each village.

        But neighboring countries have the opportunity to influence both the central government and each of them on some part of Afghanistan, representing kindred clans, nationalities.

        As a result, it turns out that with the joint coordinated interaction of neighboring countries, there is a powerful impact both on the central government in Afghanistan and at the level of princelings.
        Those. together it is possible to influence the whole of Afghanistan as a whole. It is important that the neighboring countries have an agreement to oppose the penetration of third-party players Ala Turkey, the USA, the Saudis ...
        Because these will play destructively, destabilizing and against the influence of neighboring states.

        The "world community" is something amorphous and does not represent something single. It is, of course, interested in Afghanistan, only everyone has different interests, including as a point through which the region can be destabilized. Therefore, the "world community" in the question of Afghanistan should be sent on a walking trip.

        And all neighboring countries have common interests in Afghanistan, for example, solving the problem of drug production, reducing it. Over 10 years, quite jointly, the production of opiates in Afghanistan can be reduced.
        But this can only be done with the stabilization of the situation in Afghanistan. Along the way, the issue of all sorts of bandit formations will be resolved.

        Those. There is a complex problem that has no solution either by Afghanistan or by a group of neighboring countries, but it can be solved with the participation of all neighboring countries if we act in a coordinated manner.
        There is a real and only solution, it is logical that it will be implemented, isn't it.

        The contradictions between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan do not extend to Afghanistan and cannot be resolved through Afghanistan. Therefore, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, with the demarcation of the border, resolve the issue separately among themselves, and work on Afghanistan together with Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan within the framework of the "club of friends of Afghanistan"
        1. Spring fluff
          Spring fluff 24 July 2021 14: 06
          0
          In my opinion, you are placing the wrong accents.

          "The contradictions between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan do not extend to Afghanistan and cannot be resolved through Afghanistan. Therefore, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, with the demarcation of the border, resolve the issue separately between themselves, and work on Afghanistan together with Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan within the framework of the" club of friends Afghanistan "

          Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan do not work on Afghanistan. These senior comrades, together with Afghan residents, will work on them. Along the chain China-> Pakistan-> Afghanistan-> Central Asia. The second chain of influence is being built in Turkey. Russia will try to retain some influence, but there is little leverage.
          1. Pandiurin
            Pandiurin 24 July 2021 19: 08
            0
            Quote: Spring Fluff
            In my opinion, you are placing the wrong accents ...


            Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan do not work on Afghanistan. These senior comrades, together with Afghan residents, will work on them. Along the chain China-> Pakistan-> Afghanistan-> Central Asia. The second chain of influence is being built in Turkey. Russia will try to retain some influence, but there is little leverage.


            The Turks are a little superfluous there, it will be rather a destructive element, the British, Saudis, possibly the United States (CIA) will project their influence through Turkey.
            If the countries of the region want a really constructive and real solution to Afghanistan, then Turkey should be removed from Afghanistan to where it is.

            In my opinion, this is obvious for all neighboring states, and most likely the decision that the Turks are going home has already been made, but Erdogan, due to his ambitions, has not yet realized. At least the Taliban have voiced this.

            Reducing the role of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to the role of simple pawns who will unquestioningly carry out other people's decisions on agreements with the diasporas in Afghanistan is probably not correct. They are interested in the general normalization of the situation in Afghanistan and no one except them will be able to come to an agreement with their diasporas. So we will have to take into account their local interests in Afghanistan and consider them participants in the process, who will receive their obligations, responsibilities and mutual guarantees.
            1. Spring fluff
              Spring fluff 25 July 2021 00: 02
              +1
              Kyrgyzstan - population 6,5 million (1/3 children) -the average salary of 16 tons rubles (something a bit too much in my opinion). Since 1991, the government has changed three times as a result of revolutions. Territorial conflicts with Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
              Tajikistan - 9 million population - average salary 8 t RUB. See vovchiks and yurchiks. Not in terms of history, but in terms of the territorial division of the country. Territorial conflicts, including the fact that in 2011 China took part of the territory for debts (troops brought in and that's all).
              ------------------
              these two countries are unlikely to decide something in Afghanistan.
              ------------------
              Uzbekistan 33 million - salary 14 tr. It's more stable here. Multi-vector policy, neutrality (positions of non-alignment with any military-political blocs), actively cooperates with the United States, incl. in negotiations between the United States and T ... m (banned in the Russian Federation). Not in the CSTO, they entered the EAEU as an observer, refused to participate. Agreement with Turkey on military and military-technical cooperation, members of the Council of Turkic-speaking States, dominated by Turkey. Correct Asians. They will look around at their senior comrades ten times.
              Afghanistan - 37 million - as I understand it, about 10 tr.
              Pakistan - 223,7 million (two hundred twenty million people) - 15 thousand.
              I won't talk about China and India.
              Well, everything is straightforward as a selection - partners of equal value and ready for cooperation. I would also add troops here, but too lazy.

              I almost forgot about Turkey :) "The Turks are a little superfluous there, ... Turkey should be removed from Afghanistan"
              Turkey - 83 million - 70 tr. Member of NATO. + friendly Azerbaijan 10 million. They took it straight and left.
              1. Spring fluff
                Spring fluff 25 July 2021 00: 52
                0
                I will add.
                Pakistan is a nuclear country (estimated at about 100 munitions) and has been at war with India since 1947 for Kashmir. The government of T.
                Pakistan and Turkey traditionally support each other.
                In 1974 Pakistan was the only country to support the Turkish operation in Cyprus. In 2003, during negotiations with his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz said: "Whatever steps Turkey has outlined in relation to Northern Cyprus, we say that we support it without any reservations, we are 100% on the Turkish side." ...
                Turkey Supports Pakistan on Kashmir: In February 2020, relations between Ankara and New Delhi deteriorated due to President Erdogan's open support for Pakistan and Kashmiri militants, as well as the Turkish President's pledge to help Islamabad in the conflict with the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering ( an intergovernmental organization that deals with combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism).

                And now all these big guys will step aside and watch how Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan decide the fate of Afghanistan (just kidding :)
    2. Spring fluff
      Spring fluff 24 July 2021 11: 36
      0
      "China, Russia, Central Asian republics, Pakistan, Iran. Many are members of the CSTO, SCO, all these countries have no contradictions, there is a history of friendly relations."
      To begin with, things are not going well with China and Russia. According to the Peking Treaty of November 1860, the Ussuri Territory (Vladivostok, Komsomolsk-on-Amur) became part of the Republic of Ingushetia.
      https://istoriki.su/istoricheskie-temy/rossiyskaya_imperiya_v_xix_veke/1077-formirovanie-rossiysko-kitayskoy-granicy-v-dokumentah-xvii-nachala-xx-vekov.html

      Here is a map with the marks of the Aigun (1858) and Beijing treaties.
      https://newsnhk.com/kak-dalnij-vostok-okonchatelno-stal-rossijskim/

      120 years ago, Russian troops took Beijing by storm
      https://topwar.ru/174209-kak-russkie-vzjali-shturmom-pekin.html

      About India and their relations with China, somehow, it is not said at all.

      Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are at war a little. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are separated by more than 900 kilometers of state border. At the same time, about half of the line is not demarcated, which is why the border residents of both states face problems due to access to water, pastures and roads. The disputed territories are approximately 30% of the length of the border of the two countries.
      1. Humpty
        Humpty 24 July 2021 13: 10
        0
        Quote: Spring Fluff
        problems arise due to access to water, pasture and roads.

        Problems arise from access to less labor-intensive and more profitable businesses than vegetable gardens and sheep grazing.
        1. Spring fluff
          Spring fluff 24 July 2021 13: 56
          0
          this is me ctrl + C / ctrl + V from the wiki :) and so here you can write so much about each country :) I was pleased with how Pandiurin represents the joint actions of a number of states that have serious contradictions.
          1. Humpty
            Humpty 24 July 2021 14: 56
            0
            Quote: Spring Fluff
            how Pandiurin presents

            Yeah not bad. And then there are so many experts in Chinese geography and ethnic distribution in the comments ... Some comments of quite smart people can lead to hiccups. For example, they once confidently asserted that Uighurs live in China, near the Afghan border. I almost fell off my chair. There were other, no less worthy, unfounded statements.
        2. Spring fluff
          Spring fluff 24 July 2021 15: 56
          0
          Here is the latest news on the topic came:
          New clash with shooting occurred on the border of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan
          https://topwar.ru/185260-novoe-stolknovenie-so-strelboj-proizoshlo-na-granice-kirgizii-i-tadzhikistana.html
      2. Pandiurin
        Pandiurin 24 July 2021 19: 25
        0
        Quote: Spring Fluff

        About India and their relations with China, somehow, it is not said at all.


        If the solution to the problem of Afghanistan is dealt with by all neighboring countries jointly and in a coordinated manner (Pakistan, China, Russia, Iran, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan ...), then India, which has a small section of the border with Afghanistan, will either join a common policy or simply not interfere.

        If they conduct a policy against everyone, they will spoil relations with other countries in the region. For example, US drones can allow the passage, there is a narrow isthmus that can easily be controlled by air defense from the territory of China and Russia. On the territory of Afghanistan, you can place a mobile air defense, for example, of Chinese production, which will be turned on only to destroy the identified target according to the coordinates provided, for example, air defense in the territory of China or Russia.

        If India hinders the normalization of the situation in Afghanistan, it can get in its direction the increased drug traffic and refugees squeezed out by ISIS from the territory of Afghanistan, they are just there, not far from India, in the mountains.
  12. Narak-zempo
    Narak-zempo 23 July 2021 08: 33
    +1
    As history shows, the only way to restore order in Afghanistan is to completely replace the local population with a more adequate one.
    Neither Great Britain, nor the USSR, nor the United States simply did not have sufficient demographic resources.
    China has them.
    And during its existence, the Celestial Empire digested and turned into Chinese huge masses of nomadic barbarians.
    But for such a project as the real peace of Afghanistan, the political will and determination of Qin Shi Huang is needed. Do the leaders of the CCP today have such a thing? I doubt.
    1. Pandiurin
      Pandiurin 24 July 2021 19: 51
      0
      Quote: Narak-zempo
      As history shows, the only way to restore order in Afghanistan is to completely replace the local population with a more adequate one.
      ...
      But for such a project as the real peace of Afghanistan, the political will and determination of Qin Shi Huang is needed. Do the leaders of the CCP today have such a thing? I doubt.


      It is the Chinese who should not have determination, but extreme stupidity, why should they go there with military forces, all the more to slaughter the population.

      The West has such an approach that there is a "Western reference democracy" and all those who correspond to it are the correct countries and have the right to exist, all with a different state structure are wrong and must be "democratized" without fail. by their existence on different principles of internal state structure, they pose a threat to the West.

      Why not give the right to Afghanistan to live as they want with a state built on medieval feudal clan principles. They want to build a multinational religious clan emirate and so live the flag in their hands. They lived like this all the way and they do it more or less, to hold on to such a way of life. The main thing is that in foreign policy they adhere to the principle that they should not go across the border with squabbles and limit them from the influence of the West.

      As they build their medieval happiness, they will want to receive money through the development of their minerals.
      This is possible if you provide a percentage of the profit to the central government and local clans where development is taking place.

      The world is diverse why Afghanistan should not exist with its own internal worldview and state structure.
      1. Narak-zempo
        Narak-zempo 24 July 2021 20: 05
        0
        Do you want to have another state of Islamic fanatics on the border of Russia? The Taliban - they are also seizing Tajikistan.
        It's honestly safer for me to see Afghanistan as a part of the Celestial Empire with a hardworking and obedient population. And the Chinese can do it, as well as bring order to Africa.
        Western "reference democracy" is just a pretext for intervention and destabilization, so do not confuse the warm with the soft. China is guided by the Mandate of Heaven, and if it comes somewhere, then seriously and for a long time forever.
        PS By the way, my advice to you, learn Chinese.
        1. strannik1985
          strannik1985 24 July 2021 20: 09
          0
          Do you want

          They won't climb, the Taliban are a creature of Pakistan, they squeezed out the "old", pro-American mujahideen, like Hekmatyar. Pakistan is the fighting hamster of China, the Chinese do not need any Islamist expansion, nor the direct military intervention of the PLA. They will take power, become an ordinary country, with amendments of course.
        2. Pandiurin
          Pandiurin 24 July 2021 20: 30
          0
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          Do you want to have another state of Islamic fanatics on the border of Russia? Taliban -
          ...

          Islam is already in Afghanistan.
          If the ISIS members are "internationalists" - no matter what nationality you are, the main thing is that you profess the correct version of the faith. For Pashtuns, Pashtun national Islam and other nationalities are always perceived as alien by the Pashtuns. Those. They can exploit Pashtun Islam only on their own territory. They, the Pashtuns, themselves are not profitable from the widespread and harsh introduction of Sharia, because they themselves do not correspond with their national traditions. They have already tried to impose their version of faith on the whole of Afghanistan and have learned a negative lesson.

          The Taliban themselves do not yet know how the state system of Afghanistan will be built, what kind of interaction with other nationalities will be. Well, maybe there is a desire to do it in its own way, but there is no possibility.

          As I understand it, the neighbors (Russia, Iran, Pakistan) give advice as needed, on what principles, with the involvement of other nationalities, to build a state and are ready to help with agreements.

          But the Taliban are still stubbornly continuing to climb the cactus. Most likely, the Taliban is waiting for a demarcation into more or less moderate, negotiable and stubborn. This must necessarily happen because the movement is loose. Further, the moderate will be helped, and the moderate will "calm" the stubborn.

          The process is underway, our Foreign Ministry is not satisfied with the Taliban, other participants in the process also seem to believe that the Taliban should become whiter and fluffier)
          Apparently pressure, for example, refusing to exclude the Taliban from terrorists.
  13. CommanderDIVA
    CommanderDIVA 24 July 2021 07: 51
    0
    The PRC's border with Afghanistan runs through the Wakhan Corridor, a narrow strip of land in eastern Afghanistan, in the Wakhan region of Badakhshan province, a rugged high-mountainous area about 295 kilometers long and 15 to 57 kilometers wide in the valleys of the Pamir, Wakhan and Pyanj rivers. According to an agreement between China and Afghanistan from 1964, a demarcation line and seven passes with a height of more than 4800 m from Chinese territory to the Wakhan corridor were marked, this is infa from Wiki, so the Taliban are unlikely to storm the high mountain peaks to penetrate the territory of China in order to raise the Uyghur uprising in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Okrug of the PRC, it is easier and cheaper for the Chinese to sponsor Pakistan in order to protect their economic interests in this region, and sooner or later they will get into Afghanistan, but here the policy of "soft power" and the economic enslavement of this country will be used, as exemplified by the countries Of Africa