The number of countries that have expressed interest in the Russian front-line bomber Su-34 is named

46

The Russian front-line bomber Su-34 has aroused the interest of many countries, but five foreign countries have so far expressed more substantive interest in the aircraft. This was announced by the director of the FSMTC of Russia Dmitry Shugaev.

Answering a question from journalists regarding the export potential of the Su-34, Shugaev said that five countries had expressed interest in the aircraft, but the matter had not yet reached concrete negotiations.



About five countries are interested in the Su-34, but there are no contract negotiations yet. A very beautiful and successful car - this is in all respects one of the "hits" in our line of "Su"

- he said.

At the same time, the head of Rosoboronexport, Alexander Mikheev, noted the great interest in the Russian bomber, especially after the successful actions of the aircraft in Syria. According to him, pre-contract work is now underway to promote the Su-32 (export version of the Su-34) to the markets of countries in Africa and the Asia-Pacific region. Deliveries, in case of signing a contract for the aircraft, can be carried out starting from 2023. What caused this, Mikheev did not explain.

Su-34 - Russian multifunctional fighter-bomber designed for striking aviation means of destruction against ground targets of the enemy in the operational and tactical depth in conditions of strong opposition. It belongs to the 4 ++ generation and allows you to carry out basic combat missions without being accompanied by cover fighters. The flight range is up to 4 km, the maximum speed is up to 000 km / h, and the combat load is up to eight tons.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    46 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +1
        21 July 2021 14: 20
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        ORRIMMS


        Yes Yes , I think so too lol
        1. 0
          21 July 2021 14: 21
          It's just that when you write the first comment on the site, this happens periodically.
          I apologize for not entirely on the topic, but this information "killed" me in the fall. Is this American sarcasm or I missed something and now we are a sidekick with the Americans?
          .Su-75 (Light tactical aircraft (LTS) "Checkmate" [1], "Sukhoi" [2], Su-75 "Buddy" (NATO codification: Friend - "Buddy")) - Russian multifunctional fighter of the fifth generation, created by the OKB named after P.O.Sukhoi. The aircraft was designed for delivery to the Russian Aerospace Forces [3], as well as for export to the countries of the Middle East, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America, as a platform with broad adaptability to the wishes of customers, and as an alternative to the F-35 heavy fighter.

          The first flight of the Su-75 "Buddy" with one engine of the second stage "Product 30" has not yet taken place. Installation of this engine on production aircraft is planned in 2023-2025. The first flight of the new fighter is scheduled for 2023.

          https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83-75



          1. 0
            21 July 2021 14: 33
            Quote: OrangeBigg
            The Su-57 was called a criminal, but here the Su-75 is kind of like a friend, buddy.

            All names of fighters begin with "F" - fighter. They do not carry any practical meaning.
            1. 0
              21 July 2021 15: 49
              Quote: OgnennyiKotik

              All names of fighters begin with "F" - fighter. They do not carry any practical meaning.

              It is precisely the short and sonorous, easily remembered aircraft names that are of practical importance in facilitating the transmission of data about the enemy aircraft during radio exchange.

              It's like "fokker" and "messer", "frame" ....
          2. +4
            21 July 2021 14: 33
            It seems that the press is writing about another name for the Su-75:
            The American edition of the Defense Blog reported, citing sources, that in the American intelligence the plane, about which little is known, was given a "creepy" nickname - "Screamer".

            US intelligence calls new Russian fighter jet a “Screamer”

            https://ytro.news/news/army/2021/07/18/1487274.shtml
          3. +1
            21 July 2021 14: 35
            Quote: OrangeBigg
            Is this American sarcasm, or did I miss something and now we are a sidekick with the Americans? The Su-57 was called a criminal, and here the Su-75 is already kind of like a friend, a friend.

            It's just that in the meager American dialect of English all the dirty words starting with the letter F have dried up - Fighter, fighter.
            That is why they called it Friend - "Friend".

            No conspiracy, everything is simple, as you can see ...
          4. +5
            21 July 2021 14: 41
            Quote: OrangeBigg
            It's just that when you write the first comment on the site, this happens periodically.
          5. 0
            21 July 2021 15: 09
            From the start they called him Hell's Whistle, then they realized how this would affect the "democratic society" and changed him to a friend. In fact, if DRY will put into business the design marks and numbers and in time, and at a price of up to $ 50 million, the plane will show that it is Hellski Whistle and normally has it from the very beginning. smile
            1. +1
              21 July 2021 15: 11
              Just now I saw the right word CRYKON.
              So Hellish Screamer! smile
        2. +7
          21 July 2021 14: 22
          It's just that a person's thoughts are confused. laughing
          1. +4
            21 July 2021 14: 27
            Quote: sanya_sergant
            It's just that a person's thoughts are confused. laughing

            Write the very first comment on any article on the site and you will get something like this. This is a technical glitch on the site. This happens from time to time.
    3. -6
      21 July 2021 14: 29
      Have we already replaced SS 24 with SS 32 in all units? I think we need to change our equipment first, although we can build it in parallel with the income from the sale for our own needs.
      1. 0
        21 July 2021 14: 34
        I think we need to change our technique first.

        And what is the practical meaning of such a replacement? Why is the Su-24 so bad that it must be replaced immediately?
        1. 0
          21 July 2021 14: 38
          In China, an analogue of the TU 16 is still flying. I did not say that the SU 24 is bad. New technology means new opportunities.
          1. 0
            21 July 2021 14: 56
            Quote: Alexander 3
            In China, the analogue of the TU 16 is still flying

            Well, it’s not quite analog.
            Yes, and the Chinese are not many years old, fresh.
            But our su24 is really ancient, the newest will soon be 30 years old.
        2. +2
          21 July 2021 14: 57
          Generation 2 aircraft is not bad? 12 tons of fuel per 1 hour of flight, preparation time for a flight with combat use is 1 hour 30 minutes ... not counting the time for refueling. Combat radius with an average bomb load of about 700 km ... Low reliability (an order of magnitude less than on the Su-34)! The average cost per hour of flight is enormous (an order of magnitude higher than on the Su-34) ... Limited aircraft life due to the rotating wing! ENOUGH?
          The Su-24M is used for two reasons:
          - due to the lack of shock all-weather aircraft of a smaller class, from complete hopelessness;
          - due to the possibility of using nuclear weapons as a carrier.
          They fall apart themselves! Only about 75 flies in the Aerospace Forces, and 275 are listed on paper?!!
          Scanty amount Su-34 in the army does not even replace the decommissioned Su-24M ...A total of 120 aircraft !!! And the contract for 20 new pieces for 3 years... Go awhile ... Here's how you go, full ass !!!
          The Su-34 cannot be sold, but what is the plant to do? Where is the Su-34M with new avionics and SU?
          1. +2
            21 July 2021 15: 22
            .not counting the time for refueling
            is it like refueling as an option included during preparation for a combat mission?
            1. -2
              21 July 2021 15: 26
              For Dummies ! To refuel a group of aircraft after departure from the TZ, with their limited number, it takes a very long time ... And in the Aerospace Forces at the airfields, there is usually no TsZTS ..., in Syria for sure ...
              1. +1
                21 July 2021 15: 39
                Quote: VO3A
                And in the Aerospace Forces at the airfields there is usually no TsZTS ..., in Syria for sure ...

                Do you give it to me? Have I been flying for 25 years? And retired already 20.
                1. -2
                  21 July 2021 15: 45
                  No need to ask such questions ... About served and retirement in the same way ... They left early, they can't do anything without us! .. Ha-ha ...
          2. 0
            21 July 2021 15: 43
            20 zaazali while M is finishing. Moreover, they said this at once.
            1. -1
              23 July 2021 17: 03
              laughing do not fire the office, Woz will have a reason to quarrel at least)
      2. +2
        21 July 2021 14: 34
        that's when we create sous 32 then we will give in part hi
      3. +1
        21 July 2021 15: 35
        Quote: Alexander 3
        Have we already replaced SU 24 with SU 32 in all units?

        There is a replacement plan, there is an order from the Ministry of Defense, which are approved and implemented not according to the wishes of VO users.
      4. +2
        21 July 2021 15: 40
        They get how much they order. Contracts with the Ministry of Defense are priority. But factories can do more. Why be idle?
      5. +1
        23 July 2021 16: 46
        This is what we are talking about, that with money from contracts they will build for themselves
    4. -6
      21 July 2021 14: 32
      A very beautiful and successful car - this is in all respects one of the "hits" in our line of "Su"

      Some strange understanding of the word "hit".
      The plane is in its third decade, not a single buyer, but a hit ???!

      In general, they would have screwed on the correct radar, modern avionics, hung a couple of Onyxes, as if it would have turned out to be a hit, and so the semi-finished product is eternal.
      1. +2
        21 July 2021 15: 40
        Front-line bomber Su-34 is changing the Su-24, which is 50 years old !!! In the USSR, each Su-24 was considered by the enemy, because it was a carrier of nuclear weapons with the entire ground support structure and targets introduced in advance into the complex ... In theory, in Russia, this should be the case for the Su-34 ... fighter-bomber, sometimes attack aircraft !!! This is a front-line bomber instead of the Su-24 and the carrier of nuclear weapons, should be !!! Therefore, "HIT" should not be sold ... I completely agree with the last phrase, all the more they promised the Su-34M ...
        1. +2
          21 July 2021 16: 10
          Quote: VO3A
          That is why "HIT" should not be sold ..

          We look at the dictionary
          Hit - in Russian - a product that enjoys great success with the public, "passing with a bang", the box office record holder

          If it's not for sale, then it's not a hit by definition.
      2. 0
        23 July 2021 16: 44
        laughing but the topvar's experts, always dissatisfied, drove up .. all of you are wrong and not that way ..
    5. +8
      21 July 2021 14: 53
      Give a nautical version and it will be a hit!
      Saturate the MPA already adequate to the flywheels wink
      It can carry two Onyxes, has long-term patrolling capabilities, two people and a comfortable cabin.

      1. +2
        21 July 2021 15: 34
        Well, Onyx is unlikely. The Su-34 has a good arsenal even without Onyx.
        . Production aircraft - yesterday, today and tomorrow Compared to the Su-34 "1st series", the revised project received a number of significant differences at the request of the customer - according to the results of tests of the aircraft and systems and in accordance with the actual availability of components. The radar complex 141Sh was revised in order to replace the radar for the protection of the rear hemisphere developed by JSC "Leninets" for the product N012 designed by the Research Institute "Fazotron" as part of the complex or installation of a "looking back" station that is not part of it. The customer agreed not to install it at all on the machines of the first series, limiting himself to a nasal radar with navigation and aeronautical navigation, radar reconnaissance, detection of ground, sea and air mobile and stationary targets, guidance of X-31A / AD guided air-to-surface missiles, as well as R -27ER and R-77 air-to-air with semi-active and active radar seeker. The built-in radio-technical reconnaissance and target designation station for Kh-31P / PD missiles with passive anti-radar seeker was supposed to interact with it. As an optical system for searching for targets and target designation, we chose the product "Platan" in a built-in installation with a retractable lens unit. But it still required fine-tuning, and at the first stage it was also allowed not to be installed, since most of the high-precision weapons (HTO) samples had guidance directly through their heads and did not require target illumination with a laser. These included, for example, the Kh-59M cruise missile with the Tekon television seeker, but new models became the main ones - the Kh-59MK active radar missile and the KAB-1500TK corrected bomb with the Crimea TGSN. They, like the Kh-59M, used the command guidance system in the APK-9 container.

        Content Source: https://naukatehnika.com/tridczatchetverka-xxi-veka-chast-4.html
        naukatehnika.com



        The Su-34 simulator can be used to train all flight elements, including combat use. Photo: avsim.su



        The military expert S. Aminov wrote in the Moscow Defense Brief magazine: “The war in South Ossetia was actually the first conflict in the world in which aviation was opposed by new generation air defense systems, such as the Buk-M1, which entered service in the eighties ... Moreover, the Russian Air Force, for the first time in its history, had to fight against the enemy's air defense system - and at once with sufficiently modern and relatively numerous (for such a small country as Georgia) anti-aircraft systems. "



        On the very first day, Georgian air defense missile systems "Buk" M1 shot down three Russian Su-25 attack aircraft and a long-range Tu-22M3 bomber, which was performing a reconnaissance flight. On the same day, Russian aviation lost a front-line reconnaissance aircraft Su-24MR, but the claims of the Georgian military, who said they had shot it down, were rejected. Realizing the threat, the command of the Russian forces took emergency measures, including using Su-34 aircraft from the 968th IISAP, armed with Kh-31P anti-radar missiles and equipped with L175V Khibiny electronic warfare stations, to suppress the enemy's air defense. As a result, according to S. Aminov, both Georgian divisions of the S-125M air defense missile systems, most of the military and civilian radars of all types were destroyed, and all the Buks and Wasps were suppressed. It is impossible to say exactly what proportion of these targets was hit by the Su-34, and only in the case of the destruction of the most powerful and new Georgian radar 36D6-M near the city of Gori was it reported that it was disabled by the Kh-31P missile launched from just such an aircraft. ... "War 08-08-08" in South Ossetia became a baptism of fire not only for the Su-34 aircraft and Kh-31P missiles, but also for the new generation electronic warfare system "Khibiny", the results of which were then the topic of a lively discussion. For obvious reasons, neither the Russian nor the Georgian sides provided data on objective control over the use of electronic warfare systems - their own and the enemy. But it should be noted that since August 10, the calculations of Georgian mobile air defense systems with their own radars have almost never been able to carry out launches, and there have been no successful firing at all, although the intensity and depth of actions of the Russian aviation increased. This can only be explained by the fact that the air defense missile systems were suppressed, and after all, the Bukov M1 stations, for example, are considered to be very good anti-jamming.

        Content Source: https://naukatehnika.com/tridczatchetverka-xxi-veka-chast-5.html
        naukatehnika.com
        1. -1
          21 July 2021 16: 17
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          The Su-34 has a good arsenal even without Onyx.

          It was a long time ago, in a past life, if we mean a technically advanced enemy, with air defense systems more recent than the eighties of the last century.
        2. +1
          21 July 2021 16: 56
          Well, Onyx is unlikely. The Su-34 has a good arsenal even without Onyx.


          No, absolutely.
          This is due to the structural reinforcement, which increased the weight of the aircraft.
          In contrast to India, the Onyx anti-ship missile did not hit the domestic Su-30s. But the Su-34 initially had a strong wing, under which heavy missiles could be placed. Two "Onyxes" on an airplane are about 44 missiles in a salvo of an air regiment

          This was confirmed by the chief designer of the Su-34:
          Martirosov, who was a supporter of such modernization and had previously confirmed the possibility of using the Onyx anti-ship missile system from underwing hardpoints.


          And as for the arsenal, you must agree, although the Kh-35 missile is very good, but when hitting large naval battle groups of a potential enemy, our aircraft will have to enter the area of ​​the ship's air defense, and missiles with a range longer than the Kh-35 are in service - not.
          But soon Zircon will be, who will be its bearer?
          Su-30 cm, with difficulty one "Bramos" carries, and then it needs to be altered and strengthened ktinstruktsii, if memory serves)))

          And what about the possibility of installing the "Sea Serpent"? Change the avionics (version of the Su-32FN, this is not an export version, this is precisely a modification of the Fighter Navy - a naval fighter), and the aircraft will be able to participate in PLO events, helping or replacing the IL-38N (version 34 naturally with reduced capabilities from Novella to IL-38 ).


          Ehhhh, what can I say ...

          Let's naval Su-34 in MRA !!
          1. +1
            21 July 2021 17: 06
            Do we even have an airborne Onyx?
            1. +1
              21 July 2021 17: 48
              BrahMos-A.
              Considering that this is a joint development, to the documentation of which there is access, then we are quite capable of releasing it for a real medium within a reasonable time frame.
              Only there are no Ducklings in the MPA, no sad
              Therefore, the absence of Onyx's air launch does not upset me so immensely.
              I want to see the contract for the naval Su-34. I believe that this will be the beginning of the revival of the MPA.
    6. 0
      21 July 2021 14: 57
      Quote: Alexander 3
      Have we already replaced SS 24 with SS 32 in all units? I think we need to change our equipment first, although we can build it in parallel with the income from the sale for our own needs.

      Friend! Read the article carefully. Su-32 - export version. In Russia, only Su-34s are used in combat units.
      About replacing the old with new ones - that rests on both finances and so on.
      Why do we need many cars of this type? We need different machines for different tasks.
      1. +4
        21 July 2021 15: 53
        Why do we need many cars of this type? We need different machines for different tasks.

        In the Russian Aerospace Forces, there are only about 500 modern attack aircraft, the rest is rubbish to write off or barely breathes!
        There are no planes for different and different tasks !!! They are already running out ... And this is for a huge, great Country!
        1. +1
          21 July 2021 15: 59
          By the way, I completely agree with you. For a great country to have high-quality fighters almost in quantity, like ours ... It's not very clear if the enemy is the states, all the more so.
          Ps. We can then put pressure in Congress, but you only have power, unfortunately ...
        2. -2
          21 July 2021 16: 19
          Quote: VO3A
          There are no planes for different and different tasks !!! They are already running out ... And this is for a huge, great Country!

          But the plant is constantly under pressure and the people are nervous that not today or tomorrow they will be reduced due to the lack of orders.
          I don’t have money for airplanes. All went to the gold toilets.
    7. +2
      21 July 2021 15: 53
      interest in the Russian front-line bomber Su-34

      Journalistic maximalism is already starting to stir up, on Federal channels it is generally overwhelmed
      a huge number of orders for the mig-35

      And here again INTEREST, I also have a great interest in both the SU-34 and the SU-57 and much more, but there can be no question of any purchase. laughing
      It is possible on business, please, or like those girls in the insta "well, every day you need to post something" ©
    8. 0
      21 July 2021 17: 01
      Combat aircraft and not for parades .. Proven in combat!
    9. -1
      23 July 2021 16: 40
      well, if kamikaze drones in the size of FAB are attached to the Su-34, then the car will be very, very good
    10. 0
      23 July 2021 17: 35
      Isn't he "secret"? In theory, there should be an export modification without the possibility of using nuclear weapons
    11. -1
      23 July 2021 21: 02
      I sell a typewriter! There are many views, but buyers ...
    12. 0
      23 July 2021 22: 44
      Quote: Orkraider
      Give a nautical version and it will be a hit!
      Saturate the MPA already adequate to the flywheels wink
      It can carry two Onyxes, has long-term patrolling capabilities, two people and a comfortable cabin.

      For the naval version, it is worth reworking the cockpit, armor is hardly needed for such a version, especially when armed with extended-range anti-ship missiles, including hypersonic ones in the future.
      I do not know if this will increase the fuel supply or the mass of suspended anti-ship missiles, but titanium armor for the naval version is out of place, it is also controversial on the standard version.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"