Military Review

New light single-engine fighter shown to Russian President Vladimir Putin

177

The new Russian light fighter, unveiled at the MAKS-2021 international aerospace show in Zhukovsky near Moscow, which opened on Tuesday, has been named Checkmate. This was reported by the press service of Rostec.


Russian leader Vladimir Putin took part in the opening ceremony of the 15th International Aviation and Space Salon MAKS-2021 and at the same time inspected the new fighter.

The head of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), Yuri Slyusar, told the head of state about the characteristics of the aircraft. According to him, the Checkmate light fighter is a new type of platform with the ability to adapt to a specific customer. At the same time, the aircraft is distinguished by wide combat capabilities and low cost.

According to a press release from Rostec, the new aircraft belongs to the fifth generation; there have never been any analogues of such an aircraft in Russia. The fighter jet combines innovative solutions and technologies, including artificial intelligence. The aircraft was built using stealth technology and has high performance characteristics.

Earlier it was reported that a new single-engine light fighter was developed at the Sukhoi Design Bureau.

The video promised by Rostec with the new fighter has not yet been published, as reported, all media are waiting. For that, "Zvezda" presented a video interview with the head of the UAC on the YouTube channel:

Photos used:
http://www.kremlin.ru/
177 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dikson
    Dikson 20 July 2021 15: 28
    -49%
    .. In general, the Trojan horse is pedal ..))) And it will walk with the letter "G" .. to confuse adversaries ..)
    1. NIKN
      NIKN 20 July 2021 15: 32
      +44
      Checkmate
      what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?
      1. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 20 July 2021 15: 35
        +16
        perhaps this is an export name so that NATO gets stuck with its abbreviations
        since for our videoconferencing we will call it differently
        1. El Chuvachino
          El Chuvachino 20 July 2021 15: 56
          +5
          That's right, it's high time to be ahead of the curve, so that later you won't endure all these Felons.
        2. Killemall
          Killemall 20 July 2021 16: 06
          +10
          Well, I'm more worried about something else ... is he already flying? and if the answer is no, then I have a question - what is the excitement about?
          1. Terenin
            Terenin 20 July 2021 16: 51
            +5
            Quote: KilleMall
            Well, I'm more worried about something else ... is he already flying? and if the answer is no, then I have a question - what is the excitement about?

            I haven't seen any delight yet No. except for the hysterical and pre-stroke "yes, damn it, when will you show it!?!?!?" am am am
            1. Killemall
              Killemall 20 July 2021 17: 20
              +5
              "yes, damn it, when will you show it!?!?!?" am am am

              show what? layout? the reason for the excitement is not entirely clear ... if this is a layout, well, well ... we have such a layout, we are working on it ... why are all these "you want to see me naked?", "Black covers are very tempting, but the details are always more interesting "... I'm interested in ... what's that mess?
              1. Terenin
                Terenin 20 July 2021 17: 29
                +2
                Quote: KilleMall
                ... I'm interested in ... what kind of dregs is this?

                Who are you asking? laughing
                1. Killemall
                  Killemall 20 July 2021 17: 30
                  +4
                  this is obviously a rhetorical question laughing
                  1. Terenin
                    Terenin 20 July 2021 17: 34
                    +2
                    Quote: KilleMall
                    this is obviously a rhetorical question laughing

                    Ah, I already began to believe that I was passing by, when designing bully
          2. zenion
            zenion 21 July 2021 14: 39
            -1
            Yes, I flew, twice into a ditch and several times into a fence, but in a cartoon.
        3. Rusik.S
          Rusik.S 20 July 2021 16: 52
          +3
          It seems like the NATO members called him a loudmouth. "screamer"
          1. Toorik
            Toorik 20 July 2021 18: 34
            0
            They called him another ... fighters, according to NATO classification, begin with an F from the word Fighter ...
        4. kulinar
          kulinar 20 July 2021 17: 50
          +1
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          perhaps this is an export name so that NATO gets stuck with its abbreviations
          since for our videoconferencing we will call it differently

          It's more chess. And real banter.
          Checkmate...
          There are a lot of translation and interpretation options in the Russian version of the presentation!
          I didn't understand at first.
          Why !!!! good
          1. Motorist
            Motorist 20 July 2021 20: 38
            0
            Quote: kulinar
            Checkmate...
            There are a lot of translation and interpretation options in the Russian version of the presentation!

            I voted for "Arctic fox" for "Petrel". Apparently, the Ministry of Defense left the name in reserve ... lol
            1. kulinar
              kulinar 20 July 2021 21: 59
              +2
              Quote: Motorist
              Quote: kulinar
              Checkmate...
              There are a lot of translation and interpretation options in the Russian version of the presentation!

              I voted for "Arctic fox" for "Petrel". Apparently, the Ministry of Defense left the name in reserve ... lol

              The Russians came up with the word Pis etz after everyone got tired of saying: "Neither say in a fairy tale, nor describe with a pen"
      2. Thrifty
        Thrifty 20 July 2021 15: 38
        +2
        Is this a purely export version? I judge by the adversary name, the Russian name for the plane was not invented, alas ...
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 41
          +7
          Any world presentation will be from English. Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense. They will still come up with a name for him. There will be something there and that's it.
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 20 July 2021 15: 51
            +4
            Unverified rumors speak of the Su-59.
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 53
              -6
              59 is more than 57. It would be strange) 56 would be more logical)
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 20 July 2021 15: 53
                +2
                There will be no less than 57. That's for sure. hi
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 58
                  -2
                  Well, it's strange how the fact that, in fact, the younger brother has a larger number)))
                  1. lazy
                    lazy 20 July 2021 17: 10
                    0
                    how would it be normal that a later plane has a larger number and su27 is more than su17, but the technological one is already another story and t10 is less than c32 in number
                  2. Offliner
                    Offliner 20 July 2021 17: 31
                    0
                    MiG-9 and MiG-31. Oh well.
                2. Grits
                  Grits 20 July 2021 16: 25
                  +1
                  Quote: Alex777
                  There will be no less than 57. That's for sure

                  Doesn't it bother anyone that there is a number 75 on the fuselage? What is it for? What does this mean? Will it be a Su-57?
                  1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                    Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 27
                    +1
                    Quote: Gritsa
                    Doesn't it bother anyone that there is a number 75 on the fuselage?

                    And the registration number RFхххххх on the tail does not bother you?
                    1. Grits
                      Grits 20 July 2021 16: 42
                      0
                      Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                      And the registration number RFхххххх on the tail does not bother

                      Little ones. I just don't know much about it. I just stated my assumptions
              2. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 15: 57
                -6
                Quote: carstorm 11
                59 is more than 57. It would be strange) 56 would be more logical)

                We do not assign even numbers to fighters.
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 20 July 2021 16: 01
                  +19
                  Su 30 nervously stumbled on the taxiing ...
                  1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                    Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 06
                    0
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    Su 30

                    there are some exceptions, but the rules are tried to be followed. Even - strike vehicles, odd - fighters (yeah, in addition to the Su-30, there is also the Su-25 - but, as mentioned above, these are exceptions to the rule). There were no military personnel, neither the MiG-16, nor the MiG-24, nor the Su-28. but there were Su-24, Il-28, etc.
                    1. vch62388
                      vch62388 20 July 2021 16: 26
                      +3
                      The Su-28 was just very good. This is a training version based on the Su-25.
                      1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 29
                        +1
                        Quote: vch62388
                        Su-28 was just very much

                        First, there was no plane. There was a prototype. From which the UTG was then made. Was it a combat aircraft? Do you remember about the Su-26?
                      2. vch62388
                        vch62388 20 July 2021 17: 01
                        +1
                        I agree, the Su-28 is not a very common vehicle. But the plane was and flew. By the way, it completely fits into the scheme adopted already in 1940, "odd - fighter, even - the rest."
                2. The comment was deleted.
              3. Volodin
                Volodin 20 July 2021 16: 02
                +3
                Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                We do not assign even numbers to fighters.

                belay

                Su-30
                1. Kurare
                  Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 32
                  +4
                  Quote: Volodin
                  belay Su-30

                  There was a time when even the military said that with their incomprehensible designations, the Sukhovites had already pulled everyone up. I think that the Su-30 is from that "opera".

                  On the other hand, the Su-30 is primarily an export vehicle.
            2. URAL72
              URAL72 20 July 2021 16: 09
              -2
              Our fighters do not have paired numbers in their names. Except for the Yak and the export designation Su-17M3, M4 (Su-20/22). So the Su-55 is more likely than the 56. The Su-30 is also essentially an export version. And the index may be less if the project began to be developed earlier but was shelved.
              1. Ua3qhp
                Ua3qhp 20 July 2021 16: 31
                +2
                And the Su-33? Not?
                1. URAL72
                  URAL72 20 July 2021 16: 33
                  +3
                  Why not? The number is not paired. Or do you offer an index? So such a fighter has been around for a long time. Even outdated.
                  1. Ua3qhp
                    Ua3qhp 20 July 2021 16: 39
                    +3
                    Is it not paired in the sense of odd?
                    1. URAL72
                      URAL72 20 July 2021 16: 43
                      0
                      Well, of course. I sit on several sites at once, that's why I hurried. But it seems so clear.
                    2. Ua3qhp
                      Ua3qhp 20 July 2021 16: 49
                      0
                      Ah .., otherwise I thought paired are two identical numbers.
                    3. URAL72
                      URAL72 20 July 2021 16: 52
                      0
                      Well, now I understand why the Su-33
        2. Grits
          Grits 20 July 2021 16: 27
          +1
          Quote: carstorm 11
          59 is more than 57. It would be strange) 56 would be more logical)

          Even numbers are given to bombers. Il-28, Tu-16, Tu-22, Tu 160, Su-24, Su-34
          1. NKT
            NKT 20 July 2021 17: 00
            +1
            Tu-95 is out of this row
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 14
              0
              Tu-95 is out of this row

              Not the first year. laughing
        3. The comment was deleted.
      3. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
        Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 15: 58
        0
        Quote: Alex777
        Unverified rumors say

        don't eat anything untested. It may be fraught ...
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 20 July 2021 16: 15
          0
          don't eat anything untested. It may be fraught ...

          We do not assign even numbers to fighters.

          wink lol
          1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
            Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 17
            -3
            The fact that fighters usually have an odd index is known to all more or less literate people. You, apparently, are not one of them.
            And why did you yesterday refuse to continue the exciting story about the Israeli stuffing in the Norwegian rocket?
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 20 July 2021 16: 21
              +1
              Two colleagues have already written to you about the Su-30, but you, apparently, are not a reader, but a writer. lol
              Unlike you, I will not give you cons.
              You already have more fleas than a dog.
              All the best. bully
              1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 24
                +1
                If not noticed, the answer was given for the Su-30. You, apparently, are not a reader yourself, only have time to smack on the keyboard?
              2. Usher
                Usher 20 July 2021 17: 08
                0
                Quote: Alex777
                Two colleagues have already written to you about the Su-30, but you, apparently, are not a reader, but a writer. lol
                Unlike you, I will not give you cons.
                You already have more fleas than a dog.
                All the best. bully

                The Su-30 is an export aircraft. Like the Su-22.
                1. Alex777
                  Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 13
                  -2
                  The Su-30 is an export aircraft. Like the Su-22.

                  Was the Su-22 in service with the USSR?
                  And the Su-30 is in service with the Russian Federation.
                2. Usher
                  Usher 20 July 2021 17: 23
                  +1
                  Quote: Alex777
                  The Su-30 is an export aircraft. Like the Su-22.

                  Was the Su-22 in service with the USSR?
                  And the Su-30 is in service with the Russian Federation.

                  Well, do you know the history of the Su-30? Originally designed for India, Indonesia and China. Only then to us. I still remember the book of the 90s about the Su-30, when the concept of the Su-30 was just released. It said that the RF Air Force would not order. For ours, the Su-37 (Su-35) was planned as a fighter for conquering air superiority and a front-line bomber Su-34. It was only after the 2000s that the concept apparently changed. And they ordered an "export" tactical two-seater multi-role fighter.
                3. Alex777
                  Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 25
                  -2
                  You, of course, speak correctly about the rules.
                  And we, with colleagues, are all right about the exception. drinks
          2. kulinar
            kulinar 20 July 2021 17: 54
            0
            Quote: Alex777
            Two colleagues have already written to you about the Su-30, but you, apparently, are not a reader, but a writer. lol
            Unlike you, I will not give you cons.
            You already have more fleas than a dog.
            All the best. bully

            And I will not accept poking in the stool of a cow ... laughing
  2. Kurare
    Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 17
    +3
    Quote: Alex777
    Unverified rumors speak of the Su-59.

    Sukhoi fighters will most likely end in numbering with seven: Su-27; Su-37 "Terminator" (not serial); Su-47 "Berkut" (prototype); Su-57. So I think that their next brainchild will be the Su-67.
    1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
      Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 20
      +1
      Somewhere Su-35 burst into tears. And many of you listed can boast that they are production aircraft?
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 25
        +1
        Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
        Somewhere Su-35 burst into tears.

        I did not name both the Su-30 and Su-35, and not without reason. With the exception of the Su-37 - all not ending in sevens - were derivatives of the Su-27. And before that there were also Su-7s; Su-17.
        1. lazy
          lazy 20 July 2021 17: 16
          +1
          su-15, su-9? why did you humiliate them were they not fighters? but su7 and su17 are not and a ib,
    2. Dikson
      Dikson 20 July 2021 16: 22
      +3
      guys .. Well, it says on it .. - 75 .. That will be a jack .. - 57-75 ..)))
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 27
        +2
        Quote: Dikson
        That will be a jack .. - 57-75 ..)))

        good It may well be.laughing
      2. Terenin
        Terenin 20 July 2021 17: 01
        +4
        Quote: Dikson
        That will be a jack .. - 57-75 ..)))

        Guys, I’m never a pilot No. This is how to understand, takes off as 57, and lands as 75? Like a train Moscow-Magadan winked
    3. Grits
      Grits 20 July 2021 16: 30
      +1
      Quote: Kurare
      Sukhoi fighters will most likely end in numbering with seven: Su-27; Su-37 "Terminator" (not serial); Su-47 "Berkut" (prototype); Su-57. So I think that their next brainchild will be the Su-67.

      It is also logical. True, the Su-30 breaks all logic here.
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 34
        0
        Quote: Gritsa
        True, the Su-30 breaks all logic here.

        The Su-30 is primarily an export vehicle. In addition, it is a double (this is about an even number). At that time, the Sukhovites generally took the numbering of the aircraft from the ceiling, do not look for logic.

        The analogy can be found in Boeing: the first seven and at the end the seven.
        1. Grits
          Grits 20 July 2021 16: 45
          -1
          By the way, the Americans are much more understandable - F is a fighter, B is a beaver, A is an attack aircraft.
          1. kulinar
            kulinar 20 July 2021 17: 57
            +1
            Quote: Gritsa
            By the way, the Americans are much more understandable - F is a fighter, B is a beaver, A is an attack aircraft.

            The warthog is a legend ...
            Like our IL-2, Grach ...
          2. URAL72
            URAL72 20 July 2021 18: 19
            -2
            By the way, the Americans are much more understandable - F is a fighter, B is a beaver, A is an attack aircraft.

            You probably haven't watched "operation Y"
        2. URAL72
          URAL72 20 July 2021 16: 49
          -1
          such a feeling, the Sukhovites generally took it from the ceiling, don't look for logic.

          Who told you that? If there was a project Su-37, Su-47, then the tsyfir is busy. But Sukhoi also has sports, educational and training. There is a passenger Su-80. In general, not all of Sukhoi's projects are known to the wide (and not so much) public, so the figure can only be guessed at.
          1. Kurare
            Kurare 20 July 2021 17: 46
            0
            Quote: URAL72
            But Sukhoi also has sports, educational and training. There is a passenger Su-80.

            I only meant the fighter line. The same Su-34, although it was created on the basis of the Su-27 concept, it serves immeno as a replacement for the Su-24.

            But, as I already wrote, many designations, IMHO, are from the ceiling.
    4. Alex777
      Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 32
      -2
      So I think that their next brainchild will be the Su-67.

      I could not come close to guessing what kind of discussion would unfold after my post about the "Su-59" ... hi
      1. OgnennyiKotik
        OgnennyiKotik 20 July 2021 17: 36
        -2
        So it says the same. Su-75 (T-75) will be.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 38
          0
          So many colleagues have already convinced me that the export option should be even, that I am not sure of anything. laughing
          By and large, it is not so important what the name is.
          It is more important to me that the plane should lift 7,5 tons of load and what kind of engine will it have? hi
          PS As for the Su-75, apparently we can assume that it will be taken into service with us?
          1. OgnennyiKotik
            OgnennyiKotik 20 July 2021 17: 50
            0
            Quote: Alex777
            what kind of engine will it have?

            I think there will be 2 to choose from. Al-41F and Product 30. Initially on 41st
            Quote: Alex777
            As for the Su-75, apparently you can assume that it will be taken into service with us?

            Need to. We have physically few modern fighters, 226 units for the whole of Russia are criminally small.
            The fighter is okay, everything is as it should be. Implementation issue.
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 52
              0
              If for ours "Product 30" goes, and for export Al-41F it will be fine. IMHO. hi
              I could be wrong, but a ceiling of 16,5 is the second option.
            2. OgnennyiKotik
              OgnennyiKotik 20 July 2021 18: 02
              0
              I don't see anything wrong with Al-41F, a proven serial engine. Unification with Su-30SM2 and Su-35. 30 products will be finished while the series is launched. And not the fact that he will be better on his head.
              By the way, I won't be surprised that closer to the flight prototype, this scheme is transformed into something like this:
            3. Alex777
              Alex777 20 July 2021 18: 04
              0
              I don't see anything wrong with Al-41F, a proven serial engine.

              And there is.

              30 products will be finished while the series is launched. And not the fact that he will be better on his head.

              I'm not ready to agree here.

              By the way, I won't be surprised that closer to the flight prototype, this scheme is transformed into something similar.

              It is unlikely that the Su project will turn into a MiG. hi
  3. Kurare
    Kurare 20 July 2021 17: 49
    +1
    Quote: Alex777
    I could not come close to guessing what kind of discussion would unfold after my post about the "Su-59" ...

    "As you name the yacht, so it will ..." fly! drinks

    I already wrote everything at Bong only 7 ... 7. A certain "bzyk" laughing
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 20 July 2021 17: 54
      -1
      Judging by what is written on the wall, it will fly well.
      1. Kurare
        Kurare 20 July 2021 18: 02
        +1
        Quote: Alex777
        Judging by what is written on the wall, it will fly well.

        God forbid!
  • Xnumx vis
    Xnumx vis 20 July 2021 17: 01
    +2
    Quote: carstorm 11
    Any world presentation will be from English. Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense. They will still come up with a name for him. There will be something there and that's it.

    So far, only advertising crackle. So the plane is for sale. Foreigners from the east love mystery and excessive chatter. Dust in your eyes .. Wah! Ah! Wai Mae ! Oh Wei! etc. Let's see the plane in action, evaluate it. We are waiting for a real demonstration. hi
  • Max otto
    Max otto 21 July 2021 12: 09
    +1
    Rave. Gagarin had "USSR" written on his helmet and that says it all, and the event was worse than any presentation there. It's just that no one needs you from the start, everything is for bucks in euros for sale. Therefore, the name is.
  • venik
    venik 20 July 2021 16: 34
    +2
    Quote: Thrifty
    The Russian name for the plane was not invented, alas ...

    ======
    Came up with: Su-75!
  • SAG
    SAG 20 July 2021 15: 38
    +6
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    I think the name is linked to the export orientation of the aircraft. Especially for Hindus and Arabs. IMHO
    1. xorek
      xorek 20 July 2021 16: 12
      -3
      Quote: SAG
      Quote: NIKNN
      Checkmate
      what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

      I think the name is linked to the export orientation of the aircraft. Especially for Hindus and Arabs. IMHO

      And still, they could have come up with a Russian name ..
    2. Grits
      Grits 20 July 2021 16: 31
      +5
      Quote: SAG
      I think the name is linked to the export orientation of the aircraft. Especially for Hindus and Arabs.

      Especially the Indians should be impressed. All the same, the homeland of chess. Marketers have targeted India.
  • FenH
    FenH 20 July 2021 15: 39
    +6
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    There is ShahMatы
    1. URAL72
      URAL72 20 July 2021 18: 29
      +1
      I read so much, in English there are many meanings of this word, including "knight's move".
  • credo
    credo 20 July 2021 15: 40
    +8
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    Defeat is one of the translation options. Most likely trolled "partners" before the premiere.
    Ours have definitely already assigned their name to it, but they keep it a secret, and of course pilots with witches will find their abilities to be used on it.
  • Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 20 July 2021 15: 58
    +2
    Have you seen hieroglyphs on Chinese cars ...... and now what are they writing?
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 20 July 2021 16: 02
    0
    In Russian it is Shah and Checkmate, what does not suit you? Simply written in Latin transcription. So the West uses it exactly.
    1. Terenin
      Terenin 20 July 2021 17: 03
      +3
      Quote: Ros 56
      written in Latin transcription. So the West uses it exactly.

      So that the adversary would understand everything before death bully
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Ruslan Sulima
    Ruslan Sulima 20 July 2021 16: 33
    0
    Exactly, prifigel from the name ... Already there is no desire to watch a possible presentation. Lyalaboly in all its glory ...
  • Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk 20 July 2021 17: 39
    -2
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    Outraged to the core! Is it a Russian plane or an English one? Let the importers of this plane call it whatever they want, and we must give it our name, although this is not officially accepted in our country. So SU- ?? (59?)
    1. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 20 July 2021 17: 47
      0
      Although the name is quite bold.
  • kulinar
    kulinar 20 July 2021 17: 44
    0
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    My first thought was that the plane was Russian, but it was called not in Russian.
    Although...
    In the Russian KHL, the names of the players are written in English, although they play in Russia and not for overseas ...
    Everything for sale ....
  • Valery Lazarenko
    Valery Lazarenko 21 July 2021 09: 13
    0
    Not only Russians live with us.
  • Cananecat
    Cananecat 20 July 2021 15: 33
    +8
    Quote: Dikson
    And walk will be the letter "G"

    When flying in a straight line, it will sharply rearrange itself into an adjacent right or left lane, confusing different queens on the F-35. Despite the fact that turn signals and brake lights are not provided.)))
    1. Dikson
      Dikson 20 July 2021 16: 51
      -2
      These are miracles! Canecat, exactly for what I have already been given 27 disadvantages, you have been given 7 advantages))
      1. Cananecat
        Cananecat 20 July 2021 19: 08
        +1
        Quote: Dikson
        for which I have already been given 27 minuses, you have been given 7 pluses))

        The presentation of thought is somewhat different ...)
  • credo
    credo 20 July 2021 15: 34
    +7
    Quote: Dikson
    .. In general, the Trojan horse is pedal ..))) And it will walk with the letter "G" .. to confuse adversaries ..)

    Where does such deep knowledge come from in something that has not even been seen?
    1. Dikson
      Dikson 20 July 2021 15: 49
      +7
      Because this whole story is tough trolling .. That is why .. But the local patriotic generals do not understand humor jokes - probably not by rank .. Especially for you - did you see a chess horse in the picture? So this plane is a horse. Are there pedals in the cockpit for control? Yes .. So the horse is pedal .. The chess horse moves like, remember?
      1. credo
        credo 20 July 2021 15: 53
        +5
        Quote: Dikson
        Because this whole story is tough trolling .. That is why .. But the local patriotic generals do not understand humor jokes - probably not by rank .. Especially for you - did you see a chess horse in the picture? So this plane is a horse. Are there pedals in the cockpit for control? Yes .. So the horse is pedal .. The chess horse moves like, remember?

        Listen, well, you just crushed me with your reinforced concrete logic.
        By the way, if you saw sprint bikes in the picture, they also look cool and, moreover, with pedals.
        1. Dikson
          Dikson 20 July 2021 16: 00
          +1
          Well, sorry ..)) This. more to you about the famous warriors, - the Greeks did not begin to tell that one city could not take for ten whole years until the wooden Horse (!!) was built .. Hence the Trojan horse .. in my post .. Here is how we sell it to everyone many hundreds of these horses .. how will we live! )) And in case of war, they will all react to our buttons for sure. because as already said about it - they say, remote control is provided, as in the UAV ... So much for the Trojan Horse .. And for me - even minuses for the irony ..
          1. Terenin
            Terenin 20 July 2021 17: 07
            +4
            Quote: Dikson
            So much for the Trojan Horse .. And for me - even minuses for the irony ..

            There is a silver lining, the cons prompted you to explain everything laughing
        2. Dikson
          Dikson 20 July 2021 16: 39
          -1
          Mister Creed ..)) tell me, eh. Where did you see the "sprint bikes" in the photo for this article? I see the President with a group of comrades against the background of a hangar with a model of an airplane inside and an image of a chess knight, but there are no bicycles there!
  • Albert Mikhailovich
    Albert Mikhailovich 20 July 2021 15: 29
    +3
    Checkmate
    - what does it mean?
    - hell knows, but it sounds cool)))))
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 32
      +13
      Checkmate is called. Literally.
    2. FenH
      FenH 20 July 2021 15: 32
      +5
      Means: Shah and Checkmate
      1. Albert Mikhailovich
        Albert Mikhailovich 20 July 2021 15: 34
        -1
        I know. Why not Chinese?
        1. FenH
          FenH 20 July 2021 15: 36
          +3
          Quote: Albert Mikhailovich
          I know. Why not Chinese?

          Because the money was given by the Arabs
          1. Albert Mikhailovich
            Albert Mikhailovich 20 July 2021 15: 41
            +2
            Well, in "Arabic" then ...
            1. FenH
              FenH 20 July 2021 15: 50
              +1
              Quote: Albert Mikhailovich
              Well, in "Arabic" then ...

              So ShahMats, this is an Arabic name
          2. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 41
            -1
            For what? What are you talking about?
            1. FenH
              FenH 20 July 2021 15: 42
              -1
              Quote: carstorm 11
              For what? What are you talking about?

              The UAE gave money for the development
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 45
                0
                Hmm ... Curious ... This makes a big difference.
                1. FenH
                  FenH 20 July 2021 15: 46
                  0
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  Hmm ... Curious ... This makes a big difference.

                  Since 2018, development is underway
                  1. carstorm 11
                    carstorm 11 20 July 2021 15: 47
                    0
                    Why such secrecy then?) Are they creating cooperation ...
                    1. FenH
                      FenH 20 July 2021 15: 49
                      +1
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      Why such secrecy then?) Are they creating cooperation ...

                      Secrecy is only in appearance, but about cooperation is publicly available
              2. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 01
                +3
                Quote: FenH
                The UAE gave money for the development

                where are the firewood from? With reference to a serious source, of course. And then one tovarisch above has already announced to everyone that it feeds on unverified rumors and, in general, to all unverified ...
                1. FenH
                  FenH 21 July 2021 15: 44
                  -1
                  Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                  Quote: FenH
                  The UAE gave money for the development

                  where are the firewood from? With reference to a serious source, of course. And then one tovarisch above has already announced to everyone that it feeds on unverified rumors and, in general, to all unverified ...

                  In February 2017, Chemezov announced that Russia and the United Arab Emirates would jointly develop a 5th generation lightweight fighter... According to him, the aircraft can be created on the basis of the MiG-29, work will begin in 2018 and will take about 7-8 years.
                  https://www.interfax.ru/russia/778699
                  1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                    Ivanoff_Ivanoff 21 July 2021 15: 51
                    -2
                    you will probably already be the fourth to whom I will write: at IDEX 2017 only agreement of intent... Which does not provide for any commitments... But with the United States - an agreement for the supply of 50 F-35A fighters to the UAE in the amount of 23,37 billion.
                    Nothing in your version converges.
                    1. FenH
                      FenH 21 July 2021 15: 53
                      -2
                      Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                      you will probably already be the fourth to whom I will write: at IDEX 2017 only agreement of intent... Which does not provide for any commitments... But with the United States - an agreement for the supply of 50 F-35A fighters to the UAE in the amount of 23,37 billion.
                      Nothing in your version converges.

                      And in general, next to the bird, what are you writing there and to whom, the fact remains.
                      1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        Ivanoff_Ivanoff 21 July 2021 16: 00
                        -1
                        the fact of the matter is that you did not give the facts. Here is the agreement for the supply of the UAE F-35 - it is a fact. And the fact is a stubborn thing.
                      2. FenH
                        FenH 21 July 2021 18: 29
                        -2
                        Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        the fact of the matter is that you did not give the facts. Here is the agreement for the supply of the UAE F-35 - it is a fact. And the fact is a stubborn thing.

                        Are you pounding into the eyes with a korendash? Or Tyama Velikorusku MOV is not reason?
                      3. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        Ivanoff_Ivanoff 21 July 2021 19: 08
                        0
                        Quote: FenH
                        Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        the fact of the matter is that you did not give the facts. Here is the agreement for the supply of the UAE F-35 - it is a fact. And the fact is a stubborn thing.

                        Are you pounding into the eyes with a korendash? Or Tyama Velikorusku MOV is not reason?

                        you said this in front of the mirror, I hope)) If you have no arguments, then this is your flaw
          3. Oleg83
            Oleg83 20 July 2021 16: 19
            +1
            Quote: FenH
            Quote: carstorm 11
            For what? What are you talking about?

            The UAE gave money for the development

            Those. the UAE gave money for the development, and the UAE themselves want the F35, which even improves relations with Israel. This version does not fit
            1. FenH
              FenH 21 July 2021 15: 44
              -2
              Quote: oleg83
              Quote: FenH
              Quote: carstorm 11
              For what? What are you talking about?

              The UAE gave money for the development

              Those. the UAE gave money for the development, and the UAE themselves want the F35, which even improves relations with Israel. This version does not fit

              Answered above
    3. Kurare
      Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 14
      0
      Quote: Albert Mikhailovich
      Why not Chinese?

      The Chinese will not acquire it anyway.
  • Dikson
    Dikson 20 July 2021 15: 34
    0
    And that the plot has not been uploaded here? There is also a video showing the president's cockpit .. And they promise deliveries to buyers in 5-6 years .. so this is just a full-size model. Doesn't fly. Doesn't fire. Concept car.
    1. OgnennyiKotik
      OgnennyiKotik 20 July 2021 15: 37
      +1
      Quote: Dikson
      And deliveries to buyers are promised in 5-6 years .. so this is just a full-size model.

      From screens and story:
      First flight in 2023. Price no more than $ 30 million, competitors are Chinese light fighters. Possible 2 local version or unmanned. Range 3000 km, combat load 7,4 tons, ceiling 16,5 km. AFAR.

      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. kuzimka
      kuzimka 20 July 2021 16: 12
      -3
      Most likely, this is a 1: 1 model made of plywood using a jigsaw, the creative guys from Rostec know how to file new funding. Moreover, they will receive the money, but the plane itself will not be promised soon. By the next MAX, Putin will be shown a model on which he can ride on the takeoff. And again they will ask for money ... Creative guys ...
  • Ruslan Sulima
    Ruslan Sulima 20 July 2021 17: 03
    -1
    For American ear)
  • alexmach
    alexmach 20 July 2021 15: 31
    +3
    light fighter Checkmate is a new type of platform with the ability to adapt to a specific customer

    Are you more specific and specific hinting at foreign customers?
    1. FenH
      FenH 20 July 2021 15: 33
      0
      Quote: alexmach
      light fighter Checkmate is a new type of platform with the ability to adapt to a specific customer

      All more concretely and concretely hint for foreign customers?IN

      Gave money to the UAE
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 20 July 2021 15: 32
    +3
    Good tease ... Show it already. And characteristics, characteristics ... wassat
    1. FenH
      FenH 20 July 2021 15: 36
      +2
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Good tease ... Show it already. And characteristics, characteristics ... wassat

      23 more minutes drinks
    2. OgnennyiKotik
      OgnennyiKotik 20 July 2021 15: 37
      -2
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Good tease ... Show it already. And characteristics, characteristics ... wassat



      There the characteristics are visible:
      https://t.me/istorijaoruzija/19677
  • -sa-
    -sa- 20 July 2021 15: 38
    +3
    The plane is very beautiful ... I think, like the Su-34, it will really like modelers and other aviation enthusiasts both in Russia and abroad
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 20 July 2021 15: 47
      -1
      Quote: -sa-
      The plane is very beautiful ... I think, like the Su-34, it will really like modelers and other aviation enthusiasts both in Russia and abroad

      Has it already taken off? Is there a video?
      1. FenH
        FenH 20 July 2021 15: 55
        +2
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        Quote: -sa-
        The plane is very beautiful ... I think, like the Su-34, it will really like modelers and other aviation enthusiasts both in Russia and abroad

        Has it already taken off? Is there a video?

        Yes, how could he, the whole sky in Israeli-designed aircraft is crammed laughing What is your name and year of development and creation, and the first flight?
        1. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi 20 July 2021 16: 06
          -1
          Quote: FenH

          Yes, how could he, the whole sky in Israeli-designed aircraft is crammed laughing What is your name and year of development and creation, and the first flight?

          What is this here?
      2. El Chuvachino
        El Chuvachino 20 July 2021 15: 59
        0
        Everything has its time.
        1. FenH
          FenH 20 July 2021 16: 01
          -1
          Quote: El Chuvachino
          Everything has its time.

          Are you talking about Israeli aircraft development? Or did you find my sarcasm complicated?
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 20 July 2021 16: 36
            +2
            The post was not for you, but for Aron. That's all. wink
            1. El Chuvachino
              El Chuvachino 20 July 2021 16: 37
              +2
              Thank you! hi
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 20 July 2021 16: 39
                +1
                Thank you! hi

                I was just passing by ... repeat
                By the way, what is your impression of the new item?
                1. El Chuvachino
                  El Chuvachino 20 July 2021 20: 52
                  +2
                  Good evening, Alexander! Sorry, what a long time smile Let's see, we'll see. Not exactly what I expected (including you), but something on the contrary was confirmed. Personally, I really, really liked the device with its capabilities when it was "knocked down"! The efficiency is amazing. I consider it necessary for my own needs, but this is how the Ministry of Defense will decide)
                  1. Alex777
                    Alex777 20 July 2021 21: 17
                    +1
                    I consider it necessary for my own needs, but this is how the Ministry of Defense will decide)

                    Chemezov seemed to say that the videoconferencing would also be taken, but nothing more concrete. Apparently it's too early.
                    1. El Chuvachino
                      El Chuvachino 20 July 2021 21: 23
                      +2
                      Hard work lies ahead.
          2. Grits
            Grits 20 July 2021 16: 38
            +3
            Quote: FenH
            Are you talking about Israeli-designed aircraft?

            But there was once Kfir. Only Israel then "listened to the good advice" of its big brother and was left without its planes. But with the planes of the "brother".
    2. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
      Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 16: 02
      -2
      Quote: -sa-
      The plane is very beautiful

      looks like a symbiosis of the F-35 and X-32, which our audience dubbed the ugliest aircraft
      1. lazy
        lazy 20 July 2021 17: 22
        0
        to say that he looks like ph35 and and x32 is like saying that a penguin and a hawk are both birds or a fat and thin man with both mouths in his head,
        1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
          Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 17: 37
          -4
          Quote: lazy
          say that it looks like fy35 and x32

          don't be lazy and just take a look. Have you turned off the Internet, can't find a photo?



          1. lazy
            lazy 20 July 2021 17: 55
            0
            how a hawk looks like a fat penguin, both birds. in front of the air intake and f16, 2 keels? moment25, moment 31, su27, 30,35,34, 57, 14, 15, fXNUMX and fXNUMX.
            1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
              Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 17: 57
              -4
              are you all right with your head and vision? There is a suspicion that you need medical attention
              1. lazy
                lazy 20 July 2021 17: 59
                0
                when no arguments are passed on to personalities, there is a suspicion that he registered 2 days ago on VO specially to shit
                1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                  Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 18: 09
                  -4
                  Quote: lazy
                  when no arguments are passed on to personalities, there is a suspicion that he registered 2 days ago on VO specially to shit

                  Photos are not arguments for you? Or vision problems? That's why I'm asking - what if you are blind?
                  The silhouette is one in one F-35. The scheme is from the Kh-32 (tailless with a ventral air intake). Yes, not as pregnant, but not as licked as the Su-27 or Su-57. Only those with vision problems cannot notice this. Well, or (and) with the head. What does your
                  Quote: lazy
                  mig25, moment 31, su27, 30,35,34, 57, 14, 15, fXNUMX and fXNUMX
                  ??
    3. Region-25.rus
      Region-25.rus 20 July 2021 16: 25
      -5
      only the coverless lanterns have apparently not been mastered until now.
  • Alexander Popov_3
    Alexander Popov_3 20 July 2021 15: 42
    -6
    What can Slyusar tell - a person far from aviation?
    And the guarantor seems to understand, listen and heed how the Russian aviation industry was being destroyed.
    1. alch3mist
      alch3mist 20 July 2021 17: 48
      -2
      Yes, a terrible picture: two rogues took the president into a "box"
  • Siegfried
    Siegfried 20 July 2021 15: 45
    -5
    and not too pompous name? Or does this product match it? Called UAP, it would be cool at least. And it looks like a cheap coolness. So it turns out a new engine, which the Su-57 itself cannot wait for, is it suddenly offered for export?
  • dimy44
    dimy44 20 July 2021 15: 47
    0
    Oh, and introduced an intrigue with this plane. Already trembling takes - if only in the end there was no disappointment)
  • jeka424
    jeka424 20 July 2021 15: 53
    -1
    does it fly or is it just a mockup?
    1. Badabum
      Badabum 20 July 2021 15: 59
      +3
      Quote: jeka424
      does it fly or is it just a mockup?

      Layout, first flight in '23.
    2. Tamparu
      Tamparu 20 July 2021 16: 02
      +1
      I think this is a full size layout ...
  • Tarasios
    Tarasios 20 July 2021 15: 56
    0
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    If the military likes it, the pilots themselves will call this pepelats with affectionate respect. For example - "horse" :) Well, taking into account the "chess message", chess horses from advertising support and reliability, unpretentiousness, high power, etc. )
    1. Kurare
      Kurare 20 July 2021 16: 22
      0
      The American media have already called him "Screamer", i.e. screaming. The nickname was given for the characteristic air intake under the fuselage, similar to the famous paintings by Edvard Munch - Skrik (i.e. Scream).
  • Daniil Konovalenko
    Daniil Konovalenko 20 July 2021 16: 03
    0
    Probably, the customer approved the name, who threw a pretty penny
  • Xenofont
    Xenofont 20 July 2021 16: 15
    +3
    MiG presented a model of a tanker UAV and a light fighter.

    1. donavi49
      donavi49 20 July 2021 16: 39
      0
      Well, this is quite a level of creativity to dazzle something. MiG will generally be hard.

      Judging from the presentation of the 5th generation of a single movement:
      23 flight - 24-25 already contracting will go. Well, we will lay down +2 years for transfers.
      Low price.
      AFAR, super-maneuverability, OBT and more.
      Stealth, 5 missiles in the compartments + pylons under the wing, if you need to fly and bomb without Stealth.

      The MiG-35 simply does not leave the future.
    2. Xenofont
      Xenofont 20 July 2021 17: 16
      0
      Sukhoi's air intake is just awful ...
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 20 July 2021 17: 24
        -2
        So they explained in an interview - computer modeling, all the cases ... in my opinion the plane neighs like a horse ... - at least from this angle in the photo - like a smile from ear to ear ..))
  • CommanderDIVA
    CommanderDIVA 20 July 2021 16: 21
    +1
    Apparently, this device has a purely export potential.
  • spirit
    spirit 20 July 2021 16: 39
    0
    Putin announced the amount of 30 lamas of evergreen presidents apiece what
    How much does su35 cost there now?
    5th generation for 30ku, something is hard to believe. And I still do not understand the internal compartments are there?
    1. Ivanoff_Ivanoff
      Ivanoff_Ivanoff 20 July 2021 18: 14
      -2
      Quote: spirit
      And I still do not understand the internal compartments are there?

      are available. But their location and size raise questions.
  • Vavilov
    Vavilov 20 July 2021 17: 14
    -1
    I understand that it is massive and cheap, we decided to take it, the market dictates! tszt No.
  • Vissarion Golubov
    Vissarion Golubov 21 July 2021 04: 31
    -1
    Is there an engine for it? Or will they be launched from the hand? When will the first regiment of the SU-57 be? Some exhibitions ...