New light single-engine fighter shown to Russian President Vladimir Putin

177

The new Russian light fighter, unveiled at the MAKS-2021 international aerospace show in Zhukovsky near Moscow, which opened on Tuesday, has been named Checkmate. This was reported by the press service of Rostec.

Russian leader Vladimir Putin took part in the opening ceremony of the 15th International Aviation and Space Salon MAKS-2021 and at the same time inspected the new fighter.



The head of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), Yuri Slyusar, told the head of state about the characteristics of the aircraft. According to him, the Checkmate light fighter is a new type of platform with the ability to adapt to a specific customer. At the same time, the aircraft is distinguished by wide combat capabilities and low cost.

According to a press release from Rostec, the new aircraft belongs to the fifth generation; there have never been any analogues of such an aircraft in Russia. The fighter jet combines innovative solutions and technologies, including artificial intelligence. The aircraft was built using stealth technology and has high performance characteristics.

Earlier it was reported that a new single-engine light fighter was developed at the Sukhoi Design Bureau.

The video promised by Rostec with the new fighter has not yet been published, as reported, all media are waiting. For that, "Zvezda" presented a video interview with the head of the UAC on the YouTube channel:

  • http://www.kremlin.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

177 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -49
    20 July 2021 15: 28
    .. In general, the Trojan horse is pedal ..))) And it will walk with the letter "G" .. to confuse adversaries ..)
    1. +44
      20 July 2021 15: 32
      Checkmate
      what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?
      1. +16
        20 July 2021 15: 35
        perhaps this is an export name so that NATO gets stuck with its abbreviations
        since for our videoconferencing we will call it differently
        1. +5
          20 July 2021 15: 56
          That's right, it's high time to be ahead of the curve, so that later you won't endure all these Felons.
        2. +10
          20 July 2021 16: 06
          Well, I'm more worried about something else ... is he already flying? and if the answer is no, then I have a question - what is the excitement about?
          1. +5
            20 July 2021 16: 51
            Quote: KilleMall
            Well, I'm more worried about something else ... is he already flying? and if the answer is no, then I have a question - what is the excitement about?

            I haven't seen any delight yet No. except for the hysterical and pre-stroke "yes, damn it, when will you show it!?!?!?" am am am
            1. +5
              20 July 2021 17: 20
              "yes, damn it, when will you show it!?!?!?" am am am

              show what? layout? the reason for the excitement is not entirely clear ... if this is a layout, well, well ... we have such a layout, we are working on it ... why are all these "you want to see me naked?", "Black covers are very tempting, but the details are always more interesting "... I'm interested in ... what's that mess?
              1. +2
                20 July 2021 17: 29
                Quote: KilleMall
                ... I'm interested in ... what kind of dregs is this?

                Who are you asking? laughing
                1. +4
                  20 July 2021 17: 30
                  this is obviously a rhetorical question laughing
                  1. +2
                    20 July 2021 17: 34
                    Quote: KilleMall
                    this is obviously a rhetorical question laughing

                    Ah, I already began to believe that I was passing by, when designing bully
          2. -1
            21 July 2021 14: 39
            Yes, I flew, twice into a ditch and several times into a fence, but in a cartoon.
        3. +3
          20 July 2021 16: 52
          It seems like the NATO members called him a loudmouth. "screamer"
          1. 0
            20 July 2021 18: 34
            They called him another ... fighters, according to NATO classification, begin with an F from the word Fighter ...
        4. +1
          20 July 2021 17: 50
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          perhaps this is an export name so that NATO gets stuck with its abbreviations
          since for our videoconferencing we will call it differently

          It's more chess. And real banter.
          Checkmate...
          There are a lot of translation and interpretation options in the Russian version of the presentation!
          I didn't understand at first.
          Why !!!! good
          1. 0
            20 July 2021 20: 38
            Quote: kulinar
            Checkmate...
            There are a lot of translation and interpretation options in the Russian version of the presentation!

            I voted for "Arctic fox" for "Petrel". Apparently, the Ministry of Defense left the name in reserve ... lol
            1. +2
              20 July 2021 21: 59
              Quote: Motorist
              Quote: kulinar
              Checkmate...
              There are a lot of translation and interpretation options in the Russian version of the presentation!

              I voted for "Arctic fox" for "Petrel". Apparently, the Ministry of Defense left the name in reserve ... lol

              The Russians came up with the word Pis etz after everyone got tired of saying: "Neither say in a fairy tale, nor describe with a pen"
      2. +2
        20 July 2021 15: 38
        Is this a purely export version? I judge by the adversary name, the Russian name for the plane was not invented, alas ...
        1. +7
          20 July 2021 15: 41
          Any world presentation will be from English. Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense. They will still come up with a name for him. There will be something there and that's it.
          1. +4
            20 July 2021 15: 51
            Unverified rumors speak of the Su-59.
            1. -6
              20 July 2021 15: 53
              59 is more than 57. It would be strange) 56 would be more logical)
              1. +2
                20 July 2021 15: 53
                There will be no less than 57. That's for sure. hi
                1. -2
                  20 July 2021 15: 58
                  Well, it's strange how the fact that, in fact, the younger brother has a larger number)))
                  1. 0
                    20 July 2021 17: 10
                    how would it be normal that a later plane has a larger number and su27 is more than su17, but the technological one is already another story and t10 is less than c32 in number
                  2. 0
                    20 July 2021 17: 31
                    MiG-9 and MiG-31. Oh well.
                2. +1
                  20 July 2021 16: 25
                  Quote: Alex777
                  There will be no less than 57. That's for sure

                  Doesn't it bother anyone that there is a number 75 on the fuselage? What is it for? What does this mean? Will it be a Su-57?
                  1. +1
                    20 July 2021 16: 27
                    Quote: Gritsa
                    Doesn't it bother anyone that there is a number 75 on the fuselage?

                    And the registration number RFхххххх on the tail does not bother you?
                    1. 0
                      20 July 2021 16: 42
                      Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                      And the registration number RFхххххх on the tail does not bother

                      Little ones. I just don't know much about it. I just stated my assumptions
              2. -6
                20 July 2021 15: 57
                Quote: carstorm 11
                59 is more than 57. It would be strange) 56 would be more logical)

                We do not assign even numbers to fighters.
                1. +19
                  20 July 2021 16: 01
                  Su 30 nervously stumbled on the taxiing ...
                  1. 0
                    20 July 2021 16: 06
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    Su 30

                    there are some exceptions, but the rules are tried to be followed. Even - strike vehicles, odd - fighters (yeah, in addition to the Su-30, there is also the Su-25 - but, as mentioned above, these are exceptions to the rule). There were no military personnel, neither the MiG-16, nor the MiG-24, nor the Su-28. but there were Su-24, Il-28, etc.
                    1. +3
                      20 July 2021 16: 26
                      The Su-28 was just very good. This is a training version based on the Su-25.
                      1. +1
                        20 July 2021 16: 29
                        Quote: vch62388
                        Su-28 was just very much

                        First, there was no plane. There was a prototype. From which the UTG was then made. Was it a combat aircraft? Do you remember about the Su-26?
                      2. +1
                        20 July 2021 17: 01
                        I agree, the Su-28 is not a very common vehicle. But the plane was and flew. By the way, it completely fits into the scheme adopted already in 1940, "odd - fighter, even - the rest."
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. +3
                  20 July 2021 16: 02
                  Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                  We do not assign even numbers to fighters.

                  belay

                  Su-30
                  1. +4
                    20 July 2021 16: 32
                    Quote: Volodin
                    belay Su-30

                    There was a time when even the military said that with their incomprehensible designations, the Sukhovites had already pulled everyone up. I think that the Su-30 is from that "opera".

                    On the other hand, the Su-30 is primarily an export vehicle.
              3. -2
                20 July 2021 16: 09
                Our fighters do not have paired numbers in their names. Except for the Yak and the export designation Su-17M3, M4 (Su-20/22). So the Su-55 is more likely than the 56. The Su-30 is also essentially an export version. And the index may be less if the project began to be developed earlier but was shelved.
                1. +2
                  20 July 2021 16: 31
                  And the Su-33? Not?
                  1. +3
                    20 July 2021 16: 33
                    Why not? The number is not paired. Or do you offer an index? So such a fighter has been around for a long time. Even outdated.
                    1. +3
                      20 July 2021 16: 39
                      Is it not paired in the sense of odd?
                      1. 0
                        20 July 2021 16: 43
                        Well, of course. I sit on several sites at once, that's why I hurried. But it seems so clear.
                      2. 0
                        20 July 2021 16: 49
                        Ah .., otherwise I thought paired are two identical numbers.
                      3. 0
                        20 July 2021 16: 52
                        Well, now I understand why the Su-33
              4. +1
                20 July 2021 16: 27
                Quote: carstorm 11
                59 is more than 57. It would be strange) 56 would be more logical)

                Even numbers are given to bombers. Il-28, Tu-16, Tu-22, Tu 160, Su-24, Su-34
                1. NKT
                  +1
                  20 July 2021 17: 00
                  Tu-95 is out of this row
                  1. 0
                    20 July 2021 17: 14
                    Tu-95 is out of this row

                    Not the first year. laughing
              5. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              20 July 2021 15: 58
              Quote: Alex777
              Unverified rumors say

              don't eat anything untested. It may be fraught ...
              1. 0
                20 July 2021 16: 15
                don't eat anything untested. It may be fraught ...

                We do not assign even numbers to fighters.

                wink lol
                1. -3
                  20 July 2021 16: 17
                  The fact that fighters usually have an odd index is known to all more or less literate people. You, apparently, are not one of them.
                  And why did you yesterday refuse to continue the exciting story about the Israeli stuffing in the Norwegian rocket?
                  1. +1
                    20 July 2021 16: 21
                    Two colleagues have already written to you about the Su-30, but you, apparently, are not a reader, but a writer. lol
                    Unlike you, I will not give you cons.
                    You already have more fleas than a dog.
                    All the best. bully
                    1. +1
                      20 July 2021 16: 24
                      If not noticed, the answer was given for the Su-30. You, apparently, are not a reader yourself, only have time to smack on the keyboard?
                    2. 0
                      20 July 2021 17: 08
                      Quote: Alex777
                      Two colleagues have already written to you about the Su-30, but you, apparently, are not a reader, but a writer. lol
                      Unlike you, I will not give you cons.
                      You already have more fleas than a dog.
                      All the best. bully

                      The Su-30 is an export aircraft. Like the Su-22.
                      1. -2
                        20 July 2021 17: 13
                        The Su-30 is an export aircraft. Like the Su-22.

                        Was the Su-22 in service with the USSR?
                        And the Su-30 is in service with the Russian Federation.
                      2. +1
                        20 July 2021 17: 23
                        Quote: Alex777
                        The Su-30 is an export aircraft. Like the Su-22.

                        Was the Su-22 in service with the USSR?
                        And the Su-30 is in service with the Russian Federation.

                        Well, do you know the history of the Su-30? Originally designed for India, Indonesia and China. Only then to us. I still remember the book of the 90s about the Su-30, when the concept of the Su-30 was just released. It said that the RF Air Force would not order. For ours, the Su-37 (Su-35) was planned as a fighter for conquering air superiority and a front-line bomber Su-34. It was only after the 2000s that the concept apparently changed. And they ordered an "export" tactical two-seater multi-role fighter.
                      3. -2
                        20 July 2021 17: 25
                        You, of course, speak correctly about the rules.
                        And we, with colleagues, are all right about the exception. drinks
                    3. 0
                      20 July 2021 17: 54
                      Quote: Alex777
                      Two colleagues have already written to you about the Su-30, but you, apparently, are not a reader, but a writer. lol
                      Unlike you, I will not give you cons.
                      You already have more fleas than a dog.
                      All the best. bully

                      And I will not accept poking in the stool of a cow ... laughing
            3. +3
              20 July 2021 16: 17
              Quote: Alex777
              Unverified rumors speak of the Su-59.

              Sukhoi fighters will most likely end in numbering with seven: Su-27; Su-37 "Terminator" (not serial); Su-47 "Berkut" (prototype); Su-57. So I think that their next brainchild will be the Su-67.
              1. +1
                20 July 2021 16: 20
                Somewhere Su-35 burst into tears. And many of you listed can boast that they are production aircraft?
                1. +1
                  20 July 2021 16: 25
                  Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                  Somewhere Su-35 burst into tears.

                  I did not name both the Su-30 and Su-35, and not without reason. With the exception of the Su-37 - all not ending in sevens - were derivatives of the Su-27. And before that there were also Su-7s; Su-17.
                  1. +1
                    20 July 2021 17: 16
                    su-15, su-9? why did you humiliate them were they not fighters? but su7 and su17 are not and a ib,
              2. +3
                20 July 2021 16: 22
                guys .. Well, it says on it .. - 75 .. That will be a jack .. - 57-75 ..)))
                1. +2
                  20 July 2021 16: 27
                  Quote: Dikson
                  That will be a jack .. - 57-75 ..)))

                  good It may well be.laughing
                2. +4
                  20 July 2021 17: 01
                  Quote: Dikson
                  That will be a jack .. - 57-75 ..)))

                  Guys, I’m never a pilot No. This is how to understand, takes off as 57, and lands as 75? Like a train Moscow-Magadan winked
              3. +1
                20 July 2021 16: 30
                Quote: Kurare
                Sukhoi fighters will most likely end in numbering with seven: Su-27; Su-37 "Terminator" (not serial); Su-47 "Berkut" (prototype); Su-57. So I think that their next brainchild will be the Su-67.

                It is also logical. True, the Su-30 breaks all logic here.
                1. 0
                  20 July 2021 16: 34
                  Quote: Gritsa
                  True, the Su-30 breaks all logic here.

                  The Su-30 is primarily an export vehicle. In addition, it is a double (this is about an even number). At that time, the Sukhovites generally took the numbering of the aircraft from the ceiling, do not look for logic.

                  The analogy can be found in Boeing: the first seven and at the end the seven.
                  1. -1
                    20 July 2021 16: 45
                    By the way, the Americans are much more understandable - F is a fighter, B is a beaver, A is an attack aircraft.
                    1. +1
                      20 July 2021 17: 57
                      Quote: Gritsa
                      By the way, the Americans are much more understandable - F is a fighter, B is a beaver, A is an attack aircraft.

                      The warthog is a legend ...
                      Like our IL-2, Grach ...
                    2. -2
                      20 July 2021 18: 19
                      By the way, the Americans are much more understandable - F is a fighter, B is a beaver, A is an attack aircraft.

                      You probably haven't watched "operation Y"
                  2. -1
                    20 July 2021 16: 49
                    such a feeling, the Sukhovites generally took it from the ceiling, don't look for logic.

                    Who told you that? If there was a project Su-37, Su-47, then the tsyfir is busy. But Sukhoi also has sports, educational and training. There is a passenger Su-80. In general, not all of Sukhoi's projects are known to the wide (and not so much) public, so the figure can only be guessed at.
                    1. 0
                      20 July 2021 17: 46
                      Quote: URAL72
                      But Sukhoi also has sports, educational and training. There is a passenger Su-80.

                      I only meant the fighter line. The same Su-34, although it was created on the basis of the Su-27 concept, it serves immeno as a replacement for the Su-24.

                      But, as I already wrote, many designations, IMHO, are from the ceiling.
              4. -2
                20 July 2021 17: 32
                So I think that their next brainchild will be the Su-67.

                I could not come close to guessing what kind of discussion would unfold after my post about the "Su-59" ... hi
                1. -2
                  20 July 2021 17: 36
                  So it says the same. Su-75 (T-75) will be.
                  1. 0
                    20 July 2021 17: 38
                    So many colleagues have already convinced me that the export option should be even, that I am not sure of anything. laughing
                    By and large, it is not so important what the name is.
                    It is more important to me that the plane should lift 7,5 tons of load and what kind of engine will it have? hi
                    PS As for the Su-75, apparently we can assume that it will be taken into service with us?
                    1. 0
                      20 July 2021 17: 50
                      Quote: Alex777
                      what kind of engine will it have?

                      I think there will be 2 to choose from. Al-41F and Product 30. Initially on 41st
                      Quote: Alex777
                      As for the Su-75, apparently you can assume that it will be taken into service with us?

                      Need to. We have physically few modern fighters, 226 units for the whole of Russia are criminally small.
                      The fighter is okay, everything is as it should be. Implementation issue.
                      1. 0
                        20 July 2021 17: 52
                        If for ours "Product 30" goes, and for export Al-41F it will be fine. IMHO. hi
                        I could be wrong, but a ceiling of 16,5 is the second option.
                      2. 0
                        20 July 2021 18: 02
                        I don't see anything wrong with Al-41F, a proven serial engine. Unification with Su-30SM2 and Su-35. 30 products will be finished while the series is launched. And not the fact that he will be better on his head.
                        By the way, I won't be surprised that closer to the flight prototype, this scheme is transformed into something like this:
                      3. 0
                        20 July 2021 18: 04
                        I don't see anything wrong with Al-41F, a proven serial engine.

                        And there is.

                        30 products will be finished while the series is launched. And not the fact that he will be better on his head.

                        I'm not ready to agree here.

                        By the way, I won't be surprised that closer to the flight prototype, this scheme is transformed into something similar.

                        It is unlikely that the Su project will turn into a MiG. hi
                2. +1
                  20 July 2021 17: 49
                  Quote: Alex777
                  I could not come close to guessing what kind of discussion would unfold after my post about the "Su-59" ...

                  "As you name the yacht, so it will ..." fly! drinks

                  I already wrote everything at Bong only 7 ... 7. A certain "bzyk" laughing
                  1. -1
                    20 July 2021 17: 54
                    Judging by what is written on the wall, it will fly well.
                    1. +1
                      20 July 2021 18: 02
                      Quote: Alex777
                      Judging by what is written on the wall, it will fly well.

                      God forbid!
          2. +2
            20 July 2021 17: 01
            Quote: carstorm 11
            Any world presentation will be from English. Otherwise, it just doesn't make sense. They will still come up with a name for him. There will be something there and that's it.

            So far, only advertising crackle. So the plane is for sale. Foreigners from the east love mystery and excessive chatter. Dust in your eyes .. Wah! Ah! Wai Mae ! Oh Wei! etc. Let's see the plane in action, evaluate it. We are waiting for a real demonstration. hi
          3. +1
            21 July 2021 12: 09
            Rave. Gagarin had "USSR" written on his helmet and that says it all, and the event was worse than any presentation there. It's just that no one needs you from the start, everything is for bucks in euros for sale. Therefore, the name is.
        2. +2
          20 July 2021 16: 34
          Quote: Thrifty
          The Russian name for the plane was not invented, alas ...

          ======
          Came up with: Su-75!
      3. SAG
        +6
        20 July 2021 15: 38
        Quote: NIKNN
        Checkmate
        what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

        I think the name is linked to the export orientation of the aircraft. Especially for Hindus and Arabs. IMHO
        1. -3
          20 July 2021 16: 12
          Quote: SAG
          Quote: NIKNN
          Checkmate
          what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

          I think the name is linked to the export orientation of the aircraft. Especially for Hindus and Arabs. IMHO

          And still, they could have come up with a Russian name ..
        2. +5
          20 July 2021 16: 31
          Quote: SAG
          I think the name is linked to the export orientation of the aircraft. Especially for Hindus and Arabs.

          Especially the Indians should be impressed. All the same, the homeland of chess. Marketers have targeted India.
      4. +6
        20 July 2021 15: 39
        Quote: NIKNN
        Checkmate
        what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

        There is ShahMatы
        1. +1
          20 July 2021 18: 29
          I read so much, in English there are many meanings of this word, including "knight's move".
      5. +8
        20 July 2021 15: 40
        Quote: NIKNN
        Checkmate
        what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

        Defeat is one of the translation options. Most likely trolled "partners" before the premiere.
        Ours have definitely already assigned their name to it, but they keep it a secret, and of course pilots with witches will find their abilities to be used on it.
      6. +2
        20 July 2021 15: 58
        Have you seen hieroglyphs on Chinese cars ...... and now what are they writing?
      7. 0
        20 July 2021 16: 02
        In Russian it is Shah and Checkmate, what does not suit you? Simply written in Latin transcription. So the West uses it exactly.
        1. +3
          20 July 2021 17: 03
          Quote: Ros 56
          written in Latin transcription. So the West uses it exactly.

          So that the adversary would understand everything before death bully
      8. The comment was deleted.
      9. 0
        20 July 2021 16: 33
        Exactly, prifigel from the name ... Already there is no desire to watch a possible presentation. Lyalaboly in all its glory ...
      10. -2
        20 July 2021 17: 39
        Quote: NIKNN
        Checkmate
        what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

        Outraged to the core! Is it a Russian plane or an English one? Let the importers of this plane call it whatever they want, and we must give it our name, although this is not officially accepted in our country. So SU- ?? (59?)
        1. 0
          20 July 2021 17: 47
          Although the name is quite bold.
      11. 0
        20 July 2021 17: 44
        Quote: NIKNN
        Checkmate
        what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

        My first thought was that the plane was Russian, but it was called not in Russian.
        Although...
        In the Russian KHL, the names of the players are written in English, although they play in Russia and not for overseas ...
        Everything for sale ....
      12. 0
        21 July 2021 09: 13
        Not only Russians live with us.
    2. +8
      20 July 2021 15: 33
      Quote: Dikson
      And walk will be the letter "G"

      When flying in a straight line, it will sharply rearrange itself into an adjacent right or left lane, confusing different queens on the F-35. Despite the fact that turn signals and brake lights are not provided.)))
      1. -2
        20 July 2021 16: 51
        These are miracles! Canecat, exactly for what I have already been given 27 disadvantages, you have been given 7 advantages))
        1. +1
          20 July 2021 19: 08
          Quote: Dikson
          for which I have already been given 27 minuses, you have been given 7 pluses))

          The presentation of thought is somewhat different ...)
    3. +7
      20 July 2021 15: 34
      Quote: Dikson
      .. In general, the Trojan horse is pedal ..))) And it will walk with the letter "G" .. to confuse adversaries ..)

      Where does such deep knowledge come from in something that has not even been seen?
      1. +7
        20 July 2021 15: 49
        Because this whole story is tough trolling .. That is why .. But the local patriotic generals do not understand humor jokes - probably not by rank .. Especially for you - did you see a chess horse in the picture? So this plane is a horse. Are there pedals in the cockpit for control? Yes .. So the horse is pedal .. The chess horse moves like, remember?
        1. +5
          20 July 2021 15: 53
          Quote: Dikson
          Because this whole story is tough trolling .. That is why .. But the local patriotic generals do not understand humor jokes - probably not by rank .. Especially for you - did you see a chess horse in the picture? So this plane is a horse. Are there pedals in the cockpit for control? Yes .. So the horse is pedal .. The chess horse moves like, remember?

          Listen, well, you just crushed me with your reinforced concrete logic.
          By the way, if you saw sprint bikes in the picture, they also look cool and, moreover, with pedals.
          1. +1
            20 July 2021 16: 00
            Well, sorry ..)) This. more to you about the famous warriors, - the Greeks did not begin to tell that one city could not take for ten whole years until the wooden Horse (!!) was built .. Hence the Trojan horse .. in my post .. Here is how we sell it to everyone many hundreds of these horses .. how will we live! )) And in case of war, they will all react to our buttons for sure. because as already said about it - they say, remote control is provided, as in the UAV ... So much for the Trojan Horse .. And for me - even minuses for the irony ..
            1. +4
              20 July 2021 17: 07
              Quote: Dikson
              So much for the Trojan Horse .. And for me - even minuses for the irony ..

              There is a silver lining, the cons prompted you to explain everything laughing
          2. -1
            20 July 2021 16: 39
            Mister Creed ..)) tell me, eh. Where did you see the "sprint bikes" in the photo for this article? I see the President with a group of comrades against the background of a hangar with a model of an airplane inside and an image of a chess knight, but there are no bicycles there!
  2. +3
    20 July 2021 15: 29
    Checkmate
    - what does it mean?
    - hell knows, but it sounds cool)))))
    1. +13
      20 July 2021 15: 32
      Checkmate is called. Literally.
    2. +5
      20 July 2021 15: 32
      Means: Shah and Checkmate
      1. -1
        20 July 2021 15: 34
        I know. Why not Chinese?
        1. +3
          20 July 2021 15: 36
          Quote: Albert Mikhailovich
          I know. Why not Chinese?

          Because the money was given by the Arabs
          1. +2
            20 July 2021 15: 41
            Well, in "Arabic" then ...
            1. +1
              20 July 2021 15: 50
              Quote: Albert Mikhailovich
              Well, in "Arabic" then ...

              So ShahMats, this is an Arabic name
          2. -1
            20 July 2021 15: 41
            For what? What are you talking about?
            1. -1
              20 July 2021 15: 42
              Quote: carstorm 11
              For what? What are you talking about?

              The UAE gave money for the development
              1. 0
                20 July 2021 15: 45
                Hmm ... Curious ... This makes a big difference.
                1. 0
                  20 July 2021 15: 46
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  Hmm ... Curious ... This makes a big difference.

                  Since 2018, development is underway
                  1. 0
                    20 July 2021 15: 47
                    Why such secrecy then?) Are they creating cooperation ...
                    1. +1
                      20 July 2021 15: 49
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      Why such secrecy then?) Are they creating cooperation ...

                      Secrecy is only in appearance, but about cooperation is publicly available
              2. +3
                20 July 2021 16: 01
                Quote: FenH
                The UAE gave money for the development

                where are the firewood from? With reference to a serious source, of course. And then one tovarisch above has already announced to everyone that it feeds on unverified rumors and, in general, to all unverified ...
                1. -1
                  21 July 2021 15: 44
                  Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                  Quote: FenH
                  The UAE gave money for the development

                  where are the firewood from? With reference to a serious source, of course. And then one tovarisch above has already announced to everyone that it feeds on unverified rumors and, in general, to all unverified ...

                  In February 2017, Chemezov announced that Russia and the United Arab Emirates would jointly develop a 5th generation lightweight fighter... According to him, the aircraft can be created on the basis of the MiG-29, work will begin in 2018 and will take about 7-8 years.
                  https://www.interfax.ru/russia/778699
                  1. -2
                    21 July 2021 15: 51
                    you will probably already be the fourth to whom I will write: at IDEX 2017 only agreement of intent... Which does not provide for any commitments... But with the United States - an agreement for the supply of 50 F-35A fighters to the UAE in the amount of 23,37 billion.
                    Nothing in your version converges.
                    1. -2
                      21 July 2021 15: 53
                      Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                      you will probably already be the fourth to whom I will write: at IDEX 2017 only agreement of intent... Which does not provide for any commitments... But with the United States - an agreement for the supply of 50 F-35A fighters to the UAE in the amount of 23,37 billion.
                      Nothing in your version converges.

                      And in general, next to the bird, what are you writing there and to whom, the fact remains.
                      1. -1
                        21 July 2021 16: 00
                        the fact of the matter is that you did not give the facts. Here is the agreement for the supply of the UAE F-35 - it is a fact. And the fact is a stubborn thing.
                      2. -2
                        21 July 2021 18: 29
                        Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        the fact of the matter is that you did not give the facts. Here is the agreement for the supply of the UAE F-35 - it is a fact. And the fact is a stubborn thing.

                        Are you pounding into the eyes with a korendash? Or Tyama Velikorusku MOV is not reason?
                      3. 0
                        21 July 2021 19: 08
                        Quote: FenH
                        Quote: Ivanoff_Ivanoff
                        the fact of the matter is that you did not give the facts. Here is the agreement for the supply of the UAE F-35 - it is a fact. And the fact is a stubborn thing.

                        Are you pounding into the eyes with a korendash? Or Tyama Velikorusku MOV is not reason?

                        you said this in front of the mirror, I hope)) If you have no arguments, then this is your flaw
              3. +1
                20 July 2021 16: 19
                Quote: FenH
                Quote: carstorm 11
                For what? What are you talking about?

                The UAE gave money for the development

                Those. the UAE gave money for the development, and the UAE themselves want the F35, which even improves relations with Israel. This version does not fit
                1. -2
                  21 July 2021 15: 44
                  Quote: oleg83
                  Quote: FenH
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  For what? What are you talking about?

                  The UAE gave money for the development

                  Those. the UAE gave money for the development, and the UAE themselves want the F35, which even improves relations with Israel. This version does not fit

                  Answered above
        2. 0
          20 July 2021 16: 14
          Quote: Albert Mikhailovich
          Why not Chinese?

          The Chinese will not acquire it anyway.
    3. 0
      20 July 2021 15: 34
      And that the plot has not been uploaded here? There is also a video showing the president's cockpit .. And they promise deliveries to buyers in 5-6 years .. so this is just a full-size model. Doesn't fly. Doesn't fire. Concept car.
      1. +1
        20 July 2021 15: 37
        Quote: Dikson
        And deliveries to buyers are promised in 5-6 years .. so this is just a full-size model.

        From screens and story:
        First flight in 2023. Price no more than $ 30 million, competitors are Chinese light fighters. Possible 2 local version or unmanned. Range 3000 km, combat load 7,4 tons, ceiling 16,5 km. AFAR.

        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -3
        20 July 2021 16: 12
        Most likely, this is a 1: 1 model made of plywood using a jigsaw, the creative guys from Rostec know how to file new funding. Moreover, they will receive the money, but the plane itself will not be promised soon. By the next MAX, Putin will be shown a model on which he can ride on the takeoff. And again they will ask for money ... Creative guys ...
    4. -1
      20 July 2021 17: 03
      For American ear)
  3. +3
    20 July 2021 15: 31
    light fighter Checkmate is a new type of platform with the ability to adapt to a specific customer

    Are you more specific and specific hinting at foreign customers?
    1. 0
      20 July 2021 15: 33
      Quote: alexmach
      light fighter Checkmate is a new type of platform with the ability to adapt to a specific customer

      All more concretely and concretely hint for foreign customers?IN

      Gave money to the UAE
  4. +3
    20 July 2021 15: 32
    Good tease ... Show it already. And characteristics, characteristics ... wassat
    1. +2
      20 July 2021 15: 36
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Good tease ... Show it already. And characteristics, characteristics ... wassat

      23 more minutes drinks
    2. -2
      20 July 2021 15: 37
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Good tease ... Show it already. And characteristics, characteristics ... wassat



      There the characteristics are visible:
      https://t.me/istorijaoruzija/19677
  5. +3
    20 July 2021 15: 38
    The plane is very beautiful ... I think, like the Su-34, it will really like modelers and other aviation enthusiasts both in Russia and abroad
    1. -1
      20 July 2021 15: 47
      Quote: -sa-
      The plane is very beautiful ... I think, like the Su-34, it will really like modelers and other aviation enthusiasts both in Russia and abroad

      Has it already taken off? Is there a video?
      1. +2
        20 July 2021 15: 55
        Quote: Aaron Zawi
        Quote: -sa-
        The plane is very beautiful ... I think, like the Su-34, it will really like modelers and other aviation enthusiasts both in Russia and abroad

        Has it already taken off? Is there a video?

        Yes, how could he, the whole sky in Israeli-designed aircraft is crammed laughing What is your name and year of development and creation, and the first flight?
        1. -1
          20 July 2021 16: 06
          Quote: FenH

          Yes, how could he, the whole sky in Israeli-designed aircraft is crammed laughing What is your name and year of development and creation, and the first flight?

          What is this here?
      2. 0
        20 July 2021 15: 59
        Everything has its time.
        1. -1
          20 July 2021 16: 01
          Quote: El Chuvachino
          Everything has its time.

          Are you talking about Israeli aircraft development? Or did you find my sarcasm complicated?
          1. +2
            20 July 2021 16: 36
            The post was not for you, but for Aron. That's all. wink
            1. +2
              20 July 2021 16: 37
              Thank you! hi
              1. +1
                20 July 2021 16: 39
                Thank you! hi

                I was just passing by ... feel
                By the way, what is your impression of the new item?
                1. +2
                  20 July 2021 20: 52
                  Good evening, Alexander! Sorry, what a long time smile Let's see, we'll see. Not exactly what I expected (including you), but something on the contrary was confirmed. Personally, I really, really liked the device with its capabilities when it was "knocked down"! The efficiency is amazing. I consider it necessary for my own needs, but this is how the Ministry of Defense will decide)
                  1. +1
                    20 July 2021 21: 17
                    I consider it necessary for my own needs, but this is how the Ministry of Defense will decide)

                    Chemezov seemed to say that the videoconferencing would also be taken, but nothing more concrete. Apparently it's too early.
                    1. +2
                      20 July 2021 21: 23
                      Hard work lies ahead.
          2. +3
            20 July 2021 16: 38
            Quote: FenH
            Are you talking about Israeli-designed aircraft?

            But there was once Kfir. Only Israel then "listened to the good advice" of its big brother and was left without its planes. But with the planes of the "brother".
    2. -2
      20 July 2021 16: 02
      Quote: -sa-
      The plane is very beautiful

      looks like a symbiosis of the F-35 and X-32, which our audience dubbed the ugliest aircraft
      1. 0
        20 July 2021 17: 22
        to say that he looks like ph35 and and x32 is like saying that a penguin and a hawk are both birds or a fat and thin man with both mouths in his head,
        1. -4
          20 July 2021 17: 37
          Quote: lazy
          say that it looks like fy35 and x32

          don't be lazy and just take a look. Have you turned off the Internet, can't find a photo?



          1. 0
            20 July 2021 17: 55
            how a hawk looks like a fat penguin, both birds. in front of the air intake and f16, 2 keels? moment25, moment 31, su27, 30,35,34, 57, 14, 15, fXNUMX and fXNUMX.
            1. -4
              20 July 2021 17: 57
              are you all right with your head and vision? There is a suspicion that you need medical attention
              1. 0
                20 July 2021 17: 59
                when no arguments are passed on to personalities, there is a suspicion that he registered 2 days ago on VO specially to shit
                1. -4
                  20 July 2021 18: 09
                  Quote: lazy
                  when no arguments are passed on to personalities, there is a suspicion that he registered 2 days ago on VO specially to shit

                  Photos are not arguments for you? Or vision problems? That's why I'm asking - what if you are blind?
                  The silhouette is one in one F-35. The scheme is from the Kh-32 (tailless with a ventral air intake). Yes, not as pregnant, but not as licked as the Su-27 or Su-57. Only those with vision problems cannot notice this. Well, or (and) with the head. What does your
                  Quote: lazy
                  mig25, moment 31, su27, 30,35,34, 57, 14, 15, fXNUMX and fXNUMX
                  ??
    3. -5
      20 July 2021 16: 25
      only the coverless lanterns have apparently not been mastered until now.
  6. -6
    20 July 2021 15: 42
    What can Slyusar tell - a person far from aviation?
    And the guarantor seems to understand, listen and heed how the Russian aviation industry was being destroyed.
    1. -2
      20 July 2021 17: 48
      Yes, a terrible picture: two rogues took the president into a "box"
  7. -5
    20 July 2021 15: 45
    and not too pompous name? Or does this product match it? Called UAP, it would be cool at least. And it looks like a cheap coolness. So it turns out a new engine, which the Su-57 itself cannot wait for, is it suddenly offered for export?
  8. 0
    20 July 2021 15: 47
    Oh, and introduced an intrigue with this plane. Already trembling takes - if only in the end there was no disappointment)
  9. -1
    20 July 2021 15: 53
    does it fly or is it just a mockup?
    1. +3
      20 July 2021 15: 59
      Quote: jeka424
      does it fly or is it just a mockup?

      Layout, first flight in '23.
    2. +1
      20 July 2021 16: 02
      I think this is a full size layout ...
  10. 0
    20 July 2021 15: 56
    Quote: NIKNN
    Checkmate
    what's this? We don't have any Russian at all?

    If the military likes it, the pilots themselves will call this pepelats with affectionate respect. For example - "horse" :) Well, taking into account the "chess message", chess horses from advertising support and reliability, unpretentiousness, high power, etc. )
    1. 0
      20 July 2021 16: 22
      The American media have already called him "Screamer", i.e. screaming. The nickname was given for the characteristic air intake under the fuselage, similar to the famous paintings by Edvard Munch - Skrik (i.e. Scream).
  11. 0
    20 July 2021 16: 03
    Probably, the customer approved the name, who threw a pretty penny
  12. +3
    20 July 2021 16: 15
    MiG presented a model of a tanker UAV and a light fighter.

    1. 0
      20 July 2021 16: 39
      Well, this is quite a level of creativity to dazzle something. MiG will generally be hard.

      Judging from the presentation of the 5th generation of a single movement:
      23 flight - 24-25 already contracting will go. Well, we will lay down +2 years for transfers.
      Low price.
      AFAR, super-maneuverability, OBT and more.
      Stealth, 5 missiles in the compartments + pylons under the wing, if you need to fly and bomb without Stealth.

      The MiG-35 simply does not leave the future.
    2. 0
      20 July 2021 17: 16
      Sukhoi's air intake is just awful ...
      1. -2
        20 July 2021 17: 24
        So they explained in an interview - computer modeling, all the cases ... in my opinion the plane neighs like a horse ... - at least from this angle in the photo - like a smile from ear to ear ..))
  13. +1
    20 July 2021 16: 21
    Apparently, this device has a purely export potential.
  14. 0
    20 July 2021 16: 39
    Putin announced the amount of 30 lamas of evergreen presidents apiece what
    How much does su35 cost there now?
    5th generation for 30ku, something is hard to believe. And I still do not understand the internal compartments are there?
    1. -2
      20 July 2021 18: 14
      Quote: spirit
      And I still do not understand the internal compartments are there?

      are available. But their location and size raise questions.
  15. -1
    20 July 2021 17: 14
    I understand that it is massive and cheap, we decided to take it, the market dictates! tszt No.
  16. -1
    21 July 2021 04: 31
    Is there an engine for it? Or will they be launched from the hand? When will the first regiment of the SU-57 be? Some exhibitions ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"