Work progress on the LRSO cruise missile (USA)

15

AGM-86B cruise missiles on the pylon of a B-52H bomber

In the United States, the development of a promising air-launched cruise missile LRSO continues. This project started in 2015 and has already gone through several stages. A new phase is starting right now, the goal of which is to complete the design, flight tests and start production. According to current plans, serial missiles of a new type will enter the troops only in 2027 and will begin to replace outdated weapons.

In the early stages


Since the beginning of the eighties, one of the main strategic weapons of long-range aviation The United States Air Force remains the AGM-86B ALCM air-launched cruise missile (ALCM) used by B-52H bombers. According to current plans, despite its obsolescence, it will remain in service until the end of this decade. This requires the creation of a modern replacement model.



At the beginning of the last decade, the Air Force launched work on the creation of a promising rocket. Later this program was called Long-Range Stand-Off (LRSO). At the first stage, scientific organizations and potential contractors had to study the existing challenges and needs, as well as form the general image of the future ALCM and determine the range of required technologies.

The contracts for the competitive development of LRSO were planned to be concluded in 2015, but this did not happen. At that time, there were active disputes in Congress and the Pentagon about ways to further develop nuclear forces. It got to the point that several senators appealed to the president with a demand to stop the LRSO program. Excessive cost of the program, the presence of alternative nuclear projects, were cited as arguments. weapons and its carriers, as well as the potential negative impact of ALCM on the international situation.

Based on the results of the discussions, it was decided to continue the LRSO project, but its next stage was launched with a delay. Only in August 2017, the Air Force issued orders to Raytheon and Lockheed Martin for the development of two variants of a cruise missile. They were allocated $ 900 million to complete the work.According to the plans of that time, the competitive part of the program was to continue until 2022.


ALCM product launch

Ahead of schedule


For unknown reasons, the schedule of the competition was revised, and its results were actually determined long before the appointed date. In mid-April 2020, the Pentagon awarded new contracts for the LRSO design work. In accordance with them, Raytheon became the main contractor. In turn, Lockheed Martin had to stop developing its own version of the LRSO and become a subcontractor for Raytheon.

Customer representatives said that the developers generally coped with the tasks and prepared the necessary project documentation. Already at this stage, ahead of the original schedule, it became possible to choose a more successful design that meets the requirements of the Air Force.

In the footsteps of such News discussion of the very need for the creation and procurement of a new ALCM was resumed in light of the high cost, complexity and significant lead times. At the end of last year, opponents of the program received a weighty argument. The Congressional Budget Office has calculated that the cancellation of the development of the LRSO rocket and a special warhead W80-4 for it will allow in 2021-30. save about $ 12,5 billion

However, the Pentagon and Congress did not take into account such assessments, and the program continues. On July 1, 2021, another agreement appeared. The Pentagon issued an order to a contractor company for subsequent design work, flight tests of the rocket and preparation of serial production. Approx. $ 2 billion.They must be completed by 2027.

Challenges for the future


Despite the incoming criticism, the Pentagon does not intend to abandon the LRSO program. Also, work will continue on a number of other programs in the field of strategic nuclear weapons of various kinds. They will be developed and taken to new stages. At the same time, it is planned to regularly evaluate new projects and determine their real prospects. Due to this, it will be possible to preserve the nuclear potential without unnecessary spending.


The stealthy rocket AGM-129 ACM, which was in service in 1990-2012. Perhaps LRSO will be like her

Various military departments and Congress are currently working on the FY2022 defense budget. According to the existing draft of this document, next year, $ 609 million will be spent on the development of LRSO, which is equivalent to almost a third of the cost of the recent contract. The remaining 70% is likely to be spread over the next five years.

This means that in the next fiscal year, the LRSO will carry out new work of increased complexity and cost. It is possible that by early FY2023. it will be possible to complete the technical design, and then preparations for future flight tests will begin. It was mentioned earlier that the first flight of a new type of ALCM could take place in the mid-twenties - and so far such a time frame is realistic.

Serial deliveries of LRSO missiles will begin in 2027. According to estimates of the recent past, at the first stage of production, the Air Force can acquire approx. 1000 new products. This will re-equip the bombers on duty and create significant stockpiles, displacing outdated ALCM missiles. The possible timing of receiving the first thousand missiles remains unknown.

Features and potential


Work on the LRSO has been going on for almost 10 years, but the main technical information has not yet been disclosed. Some of the customer's requirements and plans are known, as well as their changes as work continues. Contractors, in turn, are not yet ready to show the appearance and announce the design characteristics of their products.

It is known that the Air Force wants to get a cruise missile capable of overcoming a modern advanced missile defense system. These tasks can be solved using stealth technologies in the design and special flight profiles. In terms of range, the LRSO should not be inferior to the old AGM-86B, flying 1500 miles.


B-21 Raider bomber. The new LRSO rocket will become one of the foundations of its ammunition

It was originally planned to create two modifications of the new ALCM, with nuclear and conventional warheads. Subsequently, the conventional warhead was abandoned. The current version of the project provides for the use of a W80-4 type warhead with a variable yield from 5 to 150 kt.

The LRSO is to be used by several types of carrier aircraft. It will be used by the existing B-52H and prospective B-21. It is noteworthy that in the case of the latter, it will indefinitely become the only compatible nuclear ALCM. It is expected that the emergence of a new missile for different carriers will expand the combat capabilities of strategic aviation.

In the distant future


Thus, the development of a promising LRSO cruise missile for modern and new bombers continues and moves to new stages. In view of the high requirements, the project faces certain difficulties, and its high cost attracts criticism from the thrifty congressmen. Nevertheless, the work does not stop, and their schedule is scheduled for several years in advance.

Obviously, the LRSO project will be completed on the desired date or with a slight deviation from them - and the Air Force will receive a new strategic weapon. The successful completion of the work will be facilitated by both a high level of tactical and technical characteristics and a difficult situation in the arsenals of long-range aviation.

If the LRSO does not enter service by the end of the decade, strategic bombers will be left without nuclear-armed cruise missiles. Such a blow to the potential of nuclear forces is unacceptable, and the Pentagon, together with contractors, is already doing everything possible to prevent it.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    12 July 2021 05: 39
    It looks like they don't waste time. Serious rocket.
    If our X-50 is late or fails ... it will be very sorry.
    1. +2
      12 July 2021 07: 01
      X50 has nothing to do with ... X-101 and 102, too, have steles of the hull ..., the acting American too .... Apparently, the sensors, the brains are new. Americans love that the picture is beautiful and the correction can be made and that the target itself is looking in the area. Some kind of Poplar or Yars in the paradise patrolling.
  2. -9
    12 July 2021 06: 15
    It is known that the Air Force wants to get a cruise missile capable of overcoming a modern advanced missile defense system. These tasks can be solved using stealth technology in design and special flight profiles. In one of the "action movies" with the participation of Steven Seagal, the villains kidnap a train with a "secret and terrible" weapon ... the military sends a couple of F-117 stealths to intercept the train ... But the main villain easily discovers with the help of military satellites " stealth "and destroys them with laser orbital weapons! This means that the other day I read a message that the" space nuclear tug "being developed in Russia will be used in the future in the interests of air defense; that is, and for the detection and destruction of "stealth" ... wink
    1. +4
      12 July 2021 07: 49
      Don't confuse fiction and reality.
      1. -3
        12 July 2021 09: 51
        Quote: Nemo
        Don't confuse fiction and reality.

        I'm not confusing ... but just referring to the developers' messages!
        1. +2
          12 July 2021 13: 40
          Horses, people mixed up in a heap ... In the messages of the developers it is clearly stated that the "tug" is a potential power plant for the radiating part of the spaced radar station. About a tug-based destroyer, these are already irrepressible Internet fantasies of technically illiterate "analysts".
          1. 0
            12 July 2021 21: 19
            Quote: Passing by
            The developers' messages clearly state that the "tug" is a potential power plant for the radiating part of the spaced radar station.

            More and more ways of application are being found for the promising Russian space tug "Zeus". If earlier it was planned to use it for interplanetary travel and delivery of goods to the Moon, now its functionality has expanded somewhat.


            So, earlier in the IC them. Keldysh stated that the spacecraft could "illuminate" air targets directly from orbit, interacting with ground-based air defense systems

            Are "Keldyshevites" illiterate "analysts"? belay Well well...!
            1. 0
              12 July 2021 21: 48
              I don’t know what the problem is, maybe we’re talking about different things, but I’ll single out my words on purpose:
              "tug" - potential power plant for the radiating part of the spaced radar

              This is exactly the same (with a lot of tech. Details) as in your quote:
              Quote: Nikolaevich I
              So, earlier in the IC them. Keldysh said that the spacecraft could "illuminate" air targets directly from orbit, interacting with ground-based air defense systems

              And this directly contradicts the source from which you made the judgment that the "tug" is intended for destruction. Specifically your quote:
              the "space nuclear tug" will be used in the future in the interests of air defense; that is, and for the detection and destruction of "stealth" ...
              1. 0
                13 July 2021 09: 59
                Quote: Passing by
                tug "- potential power plant for the radiating part of the spaced radar

                This is exactly the same (with a lot of tech. Details) as in your quote:
                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                So, earlier in the IC them. Keldysh said that the spacecraft could "illuminate" air targets directly from orbit, interacting with ground-based air defense systems

                "Fedot, but not that one!" You are talking about a "power plant" -tug in the "general sense"! (Well, power supply for the radar ... Well, sho? Maybe for tracking asteroids this radar ... maybe for "catching" radio signals from "distant planets" ... Where will it be "turned"?) I voiced the message, connecting the notorious "tug" specifically with the air defense! From the top it is "convenient" to detect "Stealth devices", which are less "convenient" for other systems! And you can "highlight" these "stealth" for ground and "flying" air defense in any way! Even from a radar in "tow", even a laser ...Moreover, I did not speak about the direct destruction of "air targets"... although ... there is in the announced plans for the future use of the "apparatus" and the following: The Russian nuclear space tug "Zeus" can be used to disable potential adversaries by an electromagnetic pulse and "fire" a laser, according to the materials of the Arsenal Design Bureau (part of Roskosmos), one of the developers of the complex.
                1. 0
                  13 July 2021 11: 48
                  Quote: Nikolaevich I
                  "Fedot, but not that one!" You are talking about a "power plant" -tug in the "general sense"! (Well, the power supply for the radar ... Where will it be "rotated"? I voiced a message linking the notorious "tug" specifically with the air defense

                  This may not be obvious to you, but pay attention to spaced radar, this in itself implies a radar for "stealth", for air defense missions. In another context, this type of radar is not used in a public field.
                  Quote: Nikolaevich I
                  Moreover, I did not speak about the direct destruction of "air targets".

                  I have quoted your quote, it follows from it unequivocally. If you unsuccessfully expressed your thought, just write, this is characteristic of absolutely everyone who does not have a personal editor, why do these maneuvers?
                  Quote: Nikolaevich I
                  The Russian nuclear space tug "Zeus" can be used to disable potential adversaries by an electromagnetic pulse and "fire" a laser, according to the materials of the Arsenal Design Bureau (part of Roskosmos), one of the developers of the complex.

                  That's about these dreamers I spoke about, and not about you personally (to the question of an unsuccessfully expressed thought).
                  Initially, the text was something like this:
                  As follows from the Arsenal documents available to RIA Novosti, in 2018-2019, the design bureau carried out research work to find out whether Zeus could not only remotely probe the Earth's surface and near-earth airspace, but also "influence with the help of electromagnetic radiation to radio-electronic means of control systems, reconnaissance, communications and navigation; directed energy transmission by laser radiation. "

                  A damaged phone in all its glory. In case it is not obvious, I will give specifics:
                  "carried out research work to find out" it never equals "found out that it is possible" and even less the same as "the tug is designed to install combat lasers"
                  To finally close the nonsense about a laser cannon on Nuclon - its electric power is 450 kW. Just simply. Long-range combat lasers require a megawatt-class laser. For example, the only laser that actually shot down a BR - YAL had a megawatt class power, and it shot down not from a geostationary orbit, from 36000 km, through the entire thickness of the atmosphere and through clouds, but from an echelon above the cloud layer, from a distance of several tens of kilometers.
    2. +3
      12 July 2021 22: 30
      the fact that the other day I read a message that the "space nuclear tug" being developed in Russia will be used in the future in the interests of air defense; that is, and for the detection and destruction of "stealth" ...


      And they are also offered to explore Venus, the solar system and colonize Mars. And also to supply the ROS station and fly to the moon. Excuse me, of course, but this is utter nonsense. In addition to pictures and endless concepts, there is only a meaningless test start date. 2024. And then either the donkey dies ... While there are no prerequisites that it will at least result in something.
      1. 0
        28 September 2021 15: 02
        or someone will reset to zero and all over again
  3. -9
    12 July 2021 11: 17
    They realized that they were lagging behind, and tensed. Strong. 10 years, however. A long time.
    1. 0
      13 July 2021 04: 55
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      They realized that they were lagging behind, and tensed. Strong. 10 years, however. A long time.

      Well, "lagging behind", according to their concepts, is not at all the same as according to ours. They have their own standards. They may have a lag in the new Chevrolet model, and we have a new "bucket of bolts" ...
  4. +1
    12 July 2021 12: 52
    The second article is news about LRSO for the last week - and the second "subtlety", which says that it is written from one source.
    Both news articles omitted the B-2 as a missile carrier.