Leclerc XLR: competitor to "Armata" or an attempt to catch up with "Leopard"

59
Leclerc XLR: competitor to "Armata" or an attempt to catch up with "Leopard"

The first violin of the European security system


France found itself in a rather difficult situation. On the one hand, the country can hardly be called the head of the European Union, since there is an economically more powerful Germany. On the other hand, the latter enters into electoral uncertainty that threatens to shake the foundations of European unity.

In addition, France will in any case remain the militarily strongest country in the EU. Germans have no nuclear weapons, there is no aircraft carrier of its own and there is no base that would provide a full cycle of development and production of combat aviation... The only thing Germany is objectively better at is armored vehicles. However, soon the superiority of the German Leopard 2 over the French Leclerc may be called into question.



Leclerc itself began production in 1990 and entered service in 1992. There is something that sets him apart from others tanks West. This is the weaponry. While maintaining the general classic layout, the tank, like domestic vehicles, has an automatic loader (German and American tanks are not equipped with it).


This made it possible to reduce the crew to three people.

The decision to equip the tank with such a unit affected the cost of the project, which, due to the introduction of a large number of expensive electronics, turned out to be very large anyway. De facto, until the Asians created their K2 Black Panther and Type 10, the French tank remained the most expensive, which, of course, severely limited its export opportunities. In addition to France itself, only Jordan and the United Arab Emirates bought the car. A total of 860 vehicles were built. For comparison: the number of Leopard 2 built has exceeded 3000 long ago.

New life of a new tank


Now the French tank fleet is one of the largest in the EU, although it is difficult to "see" against the background of the Russian or American. As of 2020, 222 Leclerc tanks remained in the army. The French will have to live with them for a long time.

How recently сообщил blog of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies bmpd, the General Directorate of Armaments of the Ministry of the Armed Forces of France issued on June 50 to the French group Nexter a contract for the repair and serial modernization of the first XNUMX Leclerc tanks of the French army according to the Leclerc XLR variant. This is the most significant milestone for the French armored forces in more than a decade.

A batch of fifty cars will be handed over from 2022 to 2024. There is an option for the remaining 150 vehicles with the completion of the modernization program in 2028.


What will the Fifth Republic get?

The main aspect concerns the electronic filling, namely the integration of the tank into the network of the French armed forces Scorpion.

“It is also planned to modernize the fire control system, install a laser warning system, a GALIX multispectral smoke jamming system, a BARAGE radio suppression system, a new diagnostic system, a new display system for the commander and gunner, modernize the navigation system, strengthen ballistic and mine protection, gratings in the rear of the hull and turret ... ",

- gives data blog bmpd.

The issue of armament for a tank in the 120st century is almost more acute than for combat vehicles of past eras, which is associated with a sharply increased protection. Apparently, the tank will retain its 2mm gun, but new shots will be added to the arsenal. In addition, the vehicle will receive the FN Herstal T7,62B remotely controlled weapon station with a XNUMX mm machine gun mounted on the turret.


This solution, at first glance, looks half-hearted. Indeed, back in 2019, it became known that the French corporation Nexter was actively testing a version of the Leclerc tank armed with a 140 mm cannon. According to the information provided at the time, the modified tank fired over 200 successful shots, and the developers said that the gun was 70 percent more effective than the 120 mm NATO tank guns currently in use.


However, everything falls into place if we recall the new German-French program for creating a promising new generation tank Main Ground Combat System (MGCS). One of the main components of which should be a fundamentally new gun.

Leclerc acted as a test bed in this sense. German rivals Nexter from Rheinmetall went a similar route, installing a promising 130mm cannon on the chassis of the British Challenger 2 tank. We recently saw this vehicle being tested.


No matter how successfully things are progressing with the new weapon, the serial MGCS will not appear until the mid-2030s. By that time, Russia is likely to have finalized the "Armata" (most likely, this will happen even earlier by a dozen years), and other EU countries are seriously modernizing their armored forces.

It makes no sense to compare the Leclerc XLR tank with the Russian T-14: these are vehicles of different generations, although they have approximately comparable firepower. Recall that the Russian tank received a carriage layout with an uninhabited turret, the most modern sensors and was originally positioned as a network-centric one.

It is much more interesting to compare the Leclerc XLR with other European MBTs. As a reminder, this year Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land and the British Ministry of Defense signed a contract to upgrade 150 Challenger 2 main battle tanks to Challenger 3 level. They are to receive the Israeli active protection systems (KAZ) Trophy. Earlier, Germany signed a contract to equip its Leopard 2 with these KAZ.

The system creates a protected hemisphere above the tank, tracking potential threats using radars and destroying anti-tank missiles fired at the vehicle.

It is pertinent to recall that the United States has long begun to equip some M1A2 SEP V2 Abrams tanks with KAZ. At the same time, the Americans consider the Trophy active protection complex "intermediate": it is planned to use it on the Abrams tanks before the appearance of a new active protection complex developed as part of the Modular Active Protection System (MAPS) program.


The French were less fortunate in this sense. Neither the Leclerc tanks currently in service, nor the modernized vehicles, as far as can be judged, can boast of anything like that. It is difficult to say how important this is, however, according to experts, a modern KAZ (as, for example, the Trophy mentioned above) increases the tank's survivability on the battlefield by several times.

Considering that in terms of armor, mobility and firepower, European main battle tanks are generally similar, the presence of a KAZ can give a significant advantage to one of them. Of course, to consider the complex of active protection a panacea against all threats is an extreme, but, apparently, in the future its presence will become the new standard for any tank.

On the whole, the modernization of Leclerc is a perfectly logical and justified step in the face of growing international tension. It must be assumed that more than one modernization of the French MBT is ahead of us.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    6 July 2021 05: 28
    Quote: Kama74
    What is the Armata level? Decay at the wrong moment?
    Well, before that, yes, maybe the French and far

    To date, pots and head skakuas do not produce a toilet brush. They sold everything, only the land remained in the queue ...
    1. -11
      6 July 2021 05: 46
      And how are you different from the pan-headed if you are also jumping around something with a cannon, which is the only thing that became famous for what went to parades?
      1. +9
        6 July 2021 05: 58
        It, as you say, is present at all exercises throughout the year and military ones pass) Who is interested knows about this)
      2. -7
        6 July 2021 07: 37
        As far as I remember, there was a victory in tank biathlon. I could be wrong because I don't follow these competitions.
    2. -18
      6 July 2021 05: 50
      One and the same eternal mournful song about "pots" and "skakuas". It would be better to look at their rotten braces.
      1. -1
        6 July 2021 05: 57
        Why look at them? Every day, they only talk about pots and talk about clamps) we don't really have this word because it's just one of the expressions that are understandable to a normal person.
        1. -14
          6 July 2021 06: 11
          But of course, your "Eurasians" like Dugin and others like him on all kinds of "Valdai" and "Seligers" only talk about them.
          1. +2
            6 July 2021 06: 19
            Who are they? What do their words mean somewhere? Or is someone here looking at these forums?) In my opinion, they are only pans and are watching) people, even 404 are already a little curious) I personally siotru to laugh over the look of your preziks, then a drunkard with strawberries, then a cocaine man stoned into firewood)
            1. -14
              6 July 2021 06: 35
              What are you talking about? Patriots of the Russian land - Dugin, Prokhanich, and for you their words “do not matter”? By the way, Poroshenko is a “drunk” no more than your bald head, He does not drink at all, if only because of diabetes ...
              1. +4
                6 July 2021 06: 42
                Exactly))) well, burn on and I take a bow) diabeda pancake)))
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. -8
                  6 July 2021 07: 50
                  Yes, a terrible drunk :))) And his real name is Waltsman :)))
                  1. +1
                    6 July 2021 16: 51
                    Article: "" Jews against Ukrainians "- Korchinsky called for" primitive and dense "nationalism"
                    “... Poroshenko was a bad Ukrainian, he wrote applications against me to the Musarnya, I don't like him, but he is an ethnic Ukrainian. He competed with a Jew (Zelensky), he is a very good Jew, whom I love very much, and everyone here loves very much. But many Ukrainian nationalists supported by their actions, their propaganda, their active work, it was the Jew and the Jews against the Ukrainian in the last presidential elections. They found all sorts of explanations for this, but if they were tribalists, such primitive nationalists, dense as I, they would never have done this, "the extremist explained."
              3. +3
                6 July 2021 10: 41
                He doesn't drink at all, if only because of diabetes.

                Diabetes is different. I had two acquaintances with him. I never bothered to drink vodka. Take off the pot.
              4. +6
                6 July 2021 13: 18
                diabetic. ulcer and teetotaler.
                1. -5
                  6 July 2021 17: 23
                  He is drunk only in someone's fevered imagination. Why did the author of the signature under this video decide that Poroshenko was drunk?
              5. +4
                6 July 2021 14: 16
                Quote: Slobodskoy
                What are you talking about? Patriots of the Russian land - Dugin, Prokhanich

                Only in the ravings of Svidomo Ukrainians. You are offended that you are called "pan-heads", but you yourself live with some, not even popular, ideas about Russia.
                1. -5
                  6 July 2021 17: 24
                  So you don't think Dugin and Prokhanov are patriots?
                  1. +4
                    6 July 2021 21: 50
                    Quote: Slobodskoy
                    So you don't think Dugin and Prokhanov are patriots?

                    Let's start with a simple one - I just couldn't remember who they were. That is, I seem to have heard something, but ... I looked at how they distinguished themselves ... Osspad, but they can hardly be considered healthy people.
              6. +1
                7 July 2021 17: 13
                You know, what characterizes the state of Ukraine most of all is that most of the population dreams of dumping from there. Either to work as a guest worker in the Russian Federation, or Poland, or - substitute the desired value. And in the "Russian land" - for some reason, on the contrary, they go to work in herds. Probably because of the "torn to shreds" economy. Consider this at your leisure.
      2. +3
        6 July 2021 07: 49
        Quote: Slobodskoy
        One and the same eternal mournful song about "pots" and "skakuas". It would be better to look at their rotten braces.

        Amazing. People from the country of bankruptcy with the president of the pianist teach where to look. Slobodskoy, "better" play the piano. Be in the Ukrainian trend. Say something lyrical to us)))
        1. -7
          6 July 2021 17: 25
          Well, yes, the "country is bankrupt" - Russian "patriots" for the seventh year assure that this year we will definitely die of hunger and cold, but it still doesn’t. Why would that be?
          1. +5
            7 July 2021 00: 31
            Quote: Slobodskoy
            For the seventh year, Russian "patriots" have been assuring us that this year we will definitely die of hunger and cold, but it still doesn’t. Why would that be?

            Too shy to ask. How are things going "with European salaries and pensions", with "studying in the best institutions in Europe"? Do you often go to the "Vienna Opera" and drink "fantastic coffee in Bratislava"? For a long time he was not interested in affairs in the "agrarian superpower".
            1. -3
              7 July 2021 16: 31
              Yes, about the same as yours. In terms of salaries, about the same. In Vienna, by the way, I went not so long ago, a year before the onset of the coronavirus, and drank coffee in the same place - the famous Viennese “coffee melange” and to it the cake “ Sacher, coffee in Bratislava is no better, was on that trip and there, it is only more than 50 km.
  2. +1
    6 July 2021 05: 48
    Quote: Kama74
    I'm just wondering on the basis of what you assigned some unattainable level to her?

    Based on its technical characteristics. Do you know what technical specifications are?
    1. -10
      6 July 2021 06: 09
      You know ... and you know such a catch phrase- * Paper will endure everything * ..
      TTX is all the same paper ..
      1. +6
        6 July 2021 06: 37
        Are you talking about the toilet? I agree! The T-14 was started and it continued its movement on its own. What can you say about your "stronghold"? Good technique takes years to build, not by seventh graders and not out of cardboard ...
      2. +9
        6 July 2021 06: 53
        Remember your T-64s. A great idea, a great start, a breakthrough in tank building ... How many years did the whole Union bring it to mind? At the exit - zilch! The engine is still damp, half torsion bars, which come off the bottom at the attachment points ... Further examples? There are no mistakes in those who are not trying to do anything sensible. So try to do this, and do not put a "shadow on the fence" ... Finally remember your leaky BTR-4, add the "hammer" to the heap ... Ambitions are good when they are aimed at the good of your country, and not looking for problems from neighbors ...
        1. 0
          6 July 2021 14: 42
          The T-64 is still ours. Made in the USSR.
          1. +3
            6 July 2021 15: 19
            I agree! T-64 is the ancestor of all subsequent machines. The main thing is the concept. Combined armor, automatic loader. The world's first serial tank with combined armor protection. I draw your attention, the world's first SERIAL,
  3. +2
    6 July 2021 06: 46
    Quote: Kama74
    around something with a gun

    This, as you call it, "around something with a gun" is by far the best example of a tank that will go into production in the very near future ...
    And "something with a gun" is being released from you, on the Nezalezhnaya Bone Coast, from th ... on and sticks ...
  4. +2
    6 July 2021 06: 50
    Quote: Kama74
    Do you know such a catch phrase- * Paper will endure everything *

    With this very paper, you can wipe the dupa for your Minister of Defense.
    Or even Zelensky. They will not tolerate such a thing.
  5. -3
    6 July 2021 08: 14
    The main principle of French tank building: heavier, more expensive and more useless.
    1. 0
      6 July 2021 12: 55
      A familiar song from the nineties. Ie you also consider Armatu a heavy, expensive and useless nonsense? Or, when we go exactly the same way, then we have the same type of a completely different matter, we do not count?
  6. +7
    6 July 2021 08: 40
    At the same time, the author modestly kept silent that the Israeli Trophy is the only KAZ that has passed the test in real combat conditions. Arena-M is still on trials and is not in the army.
    1. -5
      6 July 2021 10: 27
      "Blackbird" says hello
      1. +4
        6 July 2021 11: 05
        Quote: Hermit21
        "Blackbird" says hello


        Thrush did not fight.
    2. -1
      3 October 2021 00: 42
      In 2006, they were burned like firewood, and none of the vaunted KAZs helped.
      Everything Israeli is rubbish
  7. -4
    6 July 2021 09: 30
    Oh, it's all bullshit.
    Apparently, according to past articles, looking at the torment with ARMATA and others, the West is in no hurry to produce something completely new. The path of modernization, such as with the T72, also suits them. And they know how to count money.

    Tanks with tanks do not fight, recent conflicts have focused on mines, ATGMs, guided missiles, while the Star boasted that even a small-caliber cannon would take down all protruding parts from a tank in 5 seconds and make it unusable, and now there are a lot of airborne weapons

    If VVP did not promote ARMATA and other WORLD-FREE ANALOGUES, then no one would even scratch to develop a completely new
    1. +6
      6 July 2021 12: 47
      Quote: Max1995
      Tanks do not fight tanks

      Like any beautiful phrase, it is only half correct, and therefore meaningless. Where are they not at war with each other, in Afghanistan, in Syria? And what does this prove? In any large batch of strong armies there will always be an acute shortage of everything - firepower, reserves, etc., and therefore they will use everything that is at hand, and a tank is a unique combination of firepower / resistance to defeat / mobility / mass, it is such universal plug for all occasions. And on that and on the other hand. Therefore, tanks will inevitably fight tanks.
      Quote: Max1995
      ATGM, guided missiles
      KAZ solves this problem.
      Quote: Max1995
      The small-caliber cannon will remove all protruding parts from the tank in 5 seconds and render it incapacitated

      To demolish something, you must first hit, at least in size, and not with one shell out of ten, but with all, and with this, 30 mm guns (ours, for sure) have big problems. Those. some conventional "Terminator" needs to drive up somewhere about a kilometer and a half, and only then can something be demolished there, continuously pecking in bursts for several tens of seconds. Against a real sniper tank gun (any, western, ours, no difference), which easily gets into vehicles for three or more kilometers, a 30mm fart has no chance.
      Quote: Max1995
      aircraft weapons are now dofiga

      Just as dofig as ground air defense systems and fighters. And then there are non-flying weather and camouflage means, such as capes, vegetation and more. And the tank can be on the battlefield (or next to it, waiting for the moment) around the clock, but the aviation is not.
      So the tank is still an actual combat unit. One of the key in a serious conflict.
      1. 0
        6 July 2021 17: 56
        In something you are right. There will be exceptions.
        Combined Arms Combat ...... hopefully not.

        KAZ is not a panacea, 1, 2 first hits% but will reflect, and then as usual ...

        There were no tank duels in Syria, Iraq, Karabakh, Arabs or Africa. And the rest was.
        1. +1
          6 July 2021 18: 36
          I agree, there is no panacea for anything, and KAZ will come up with a council. And then KAZ will be modernized ... It's an endless process, the fight between shells and armor and all that.
          With what I disagree, in a large batch of comparable parties, tank battles will not be an exception, but the norm. For a short period of extreme vulnerability of tanks for RPGs and ATGMs passes with the massive introduction of DZ and KAZ. Anti-aircraft weapons have also dramatically increased in efficiency (especially in terms of resistance to interference), and the absolute dominance of aviation is already a big question. UAVs are also not counted, because in general the lightest are countered by advanced electronic warfare and air defense. IMHO, everything returns to the classics of the Second World War - tank wedges and rapid fur throws. columns. And again there is nothing stupid to reflect them except by oncoming strikes of armored vehicles.
          1. 0
            7 July 2021 06: 51
            For a combined-arms battle, and a sudden one, when both sides have F, it sounds logical.
            The only thing - the last such, is remembered among Jews and Arabs, in the 70s, 50 years ago.

            Even in WWII, there were only 2 major battles, the rest was trifles. Aviation and artillery alone cost ...
  8. +1
    6 July 2021 11: 58
    The main aspect concerns the electronic filling, namely the integration of the tank into the network of the French armed forces Scorpion.

    So this is the reason, not competition or an attempt to catch up, but pulling up the characteristics within the framework of the general modernization of the Sun. Previously, there were slightly different tasks, the situation has changed, they took up the task of modernizing the Armed Forces, the British are also stirring up something there.
    Yes, and how is it fundamentally different from Armata leclerc? Electronics and automation? Not. Vitality? I don't even know who will be better, if you hang KAZ on the leclerk, then maybe even he.
  9. 0
    6 July 2021 13: 33
    I believe that at the moment all MBTs are comparable in one way or another. The question is in the conditions of the battle. "Armata" really surprised when it appeared. But dependence on the supply of components (all serious electronics is not made in Russia) negates this surprise. And the country has no money for a serious game. I think that the new MBT race will begin just when the Rheinmetal 130 mm becomes the main gun for someone. Traditionally, these guys make breakthrough and serious guns. After that, Russia will have to catch up with the 152 mm caliber.
  10. -2
    6 July 2021 14: 20
    The French want to increase the caliber not because of the "Armata", but because they cannot hit the shells.
    In general, Leclercs need to be modernized for a long time, not only in terms of ammunition, but also in terms of armor. It is not for nothing that they call it an armored carton.
  11. 0
    6 July 2021 16: 45
    the Frenchman may not be bad, but ours is deadly and BEAUTIFUL !!! bully our specialists know how to make tanks good
  12. -2
    7 July 2021 07: 50
    Maginot and Eclairc did not save the paddling pool. Lack of fighting spirit and motivation.
  13. +1
    7 July 2021 12: 27
    Not a single Leclerc UAE in Emen was hit. And they beat Abrams. Also Turkish Leopard in SAR (all tipis without KAZ).
    A very good tank with a good AZ.
  14. -1
    7 July 2021 21: 33
    And they are still sculpted with rivets.