The United States intends to place Afghan refugees in the three Central Asian republics

162

The United States intends to temporarily place about 9 thousand Afghan citizens who have provided assistance to the Americans on the territory of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. The American administration has already sent a corresponding request to the governments of the above countries, Bloomberg reports, citing its own sources.

According to the agency, the White House appealed to the authorities of the three Central Asian republics to accommodate about 9 Afghan refugees on their territory. This measure is necessary to ensure the safety of Afghans who collaborated with the Americans. Washington fears that after the withdrawal of the American military contingent, they may be pursued by the Taliban * (prohibited in Russia).



Bloomberg writes that the United States has requested a temporary placement of Afghans, but there is no information for how long and where to put them. The only thing that is known for certain is that no one guarantees American visas to refugees, and if they are issued, then not to everyone.

Reportedly, the foreign ministers of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are currently on a visit to Washington and it is planned that a corresponding agreement on the placement of refugees will be signed in the near future. In addition, the United States intends to obtain permission from Tashkent and Dushanbe to conduct reconnaissance from their territories. The Pentagon presses that it will be beneficial to the republics themselves, since the Taliban have already reached their borders. It is not yet known how the persuasion will end.

The fact that the United States intends to take out of Afghanistan and place several thousand Afghans in neighboring countries became known yesterday, several American publications published this information at once, citing sources in the White House.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    162 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      July 2 2021
      All these fraternal Srenae-Asiatic peoples are ready, as one, under the sensitive American leadership ... What happiness!
      1. +12
        July 2 2021
        I would agree on the place of the Central Asian republics, $ 100 for each refugee. Money now, and the refugee later, when he takes an oath of allegiance to the host country. Americans have to pay the refugees, $ 000 a month, after all they betrayed their homeland and lay down under the Americans For the last 5 years, Bloomberg has become so yellow. They put on the wrong horse.
        1. +19
          July 2 2021
          There is still a question, what kind of refugees are they who collaborated with the Americans. Most likely, they have never been officials, they are probably the Afghan military, with combat experience, perhaps well-coordinated ...

          Although, according to rumors, the Taliban have now promised not to pursue ordinary fighters from the enemy camp.
          1. +2
            July 2 2021
            Quote: alexmach
            There is still a question, what kind of refugees are they who collaborated with the Americans.

            And then there are doubts that these "refugees" who collaborated with the Americans will receive peace and security on the territory of these republics.
            1. +3
              July 3 2021
              As far as I understand the situation in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan:
              - pro-American refugees are not needed,
              - American operations from their territory are not needed,
              - the placement of these "refugees" and the American presence in any form will be a pretext for various conflicts both within these countries and with Afghanistan. hi
          2. +13
            July 2 2021
            No, well, we all know that Americans are impudent. But once again you have to marvel at them boundless impudence. In fact, having received a refusal, they are trying to get into Central Asia again, bribing the authorities of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, by attaching their frostbitten agents, which they themselves DO NOT accept and Europe, I believe, refused to accept. Will the authorities of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan sell themselves?
            1. +7
              July 2 2021
              Will the authorities of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan sell themselves?

              I wrote already below. I have a suspicion that they are not that foolish. Well, they cannot fail to understand what is clear to us.
              1. +2
                July 2 2021
                Quote: alexmach
                they cannot fail to understand what is clear to us.

                They understand, but only how much they were allowed to bargain is the national mentality, they have the opportunity to bargain in the bazaar. Then Russia will come and settle everything.
                1. +4
                  July 2 2021
                  Look, the local elites are now undivided masters in that land. Should they find themselves in trouble? So they need to quarrel with the Taliban? And with China, for example? And create conditions on your own territory in order to lose your own power?
              2. +1
                July 3 2021
                Quote: alexmach
                I wrote already below. I have a suspicion that they are not that foolish. Well, they cannot fail to understand what is clear to us.

                Yes, I also doubt that they are so inadequate. Perhaps the Americans are doing a special stuffing in order to sow suspicion in Russia about its neighbors and try to break ties. But after all, the ministers of the Foreign Ministry of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are both in the United States now?
                1. +2
                  July 3 2021
                  Yes, I also doubt that they are so inadequate. Perhaps the Americans are doing a special stuffing

                  I have a hunch that these are Americans completely divorced from reality. Someone gave them an idea that it would not be bad like this, and they work it out as best they can.
                  But after all, the ministers of the Foreign Ministry of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are both in the United States now?

                  It's not a crime yet :)
                  1. +2
                    July 3 2021
                    Quote: alexmach
                    It's not a crime yet

                    Of course not. But alarming simultaneous, a simultaneous visit to the United States by both ministers. It is clear that the Americans will try to persuade and seduce them in every possible way. Will they resist? We are waiting, sir! smile hi
            2. +6
              July 2 2021
              Sorry, but Americans are acting in America's best interest. What prevents Russia from buying the same Central Asians? What prevents them from bribing? No money? Well, ask your oligarchs and your Gundyaev "where did you get yachts at the price of Allie Burke?" "Where is the money, Zin?" And why should Americans (or anyone else) consider any interests other than their own? Why should Russia take into account any interests other than its own. And if you do not have money to bribe all these "backs" and all these "stans" in bulk, then ask your oligarchs and "effective managers" why you have no money. Read Machiavelli, Bismarck and Friedrich. Politics is shit and dirt.
              By the way, those who "collaborated" with us knew perfectly well what they were doing when they worked for us. Yes, we will give the money now, but we do not guarantee the green card. Do you want to take risks? Your business. Nobody promises you anything except cash. And the fact that all these "refugees" are nothing more than bandits and drug dealers, well, all of Europe has already learned that. I have tasted both Multiculturalism and tolerance ... If Tajiks and others like them also want to get problems and haemorrhoids on their seats - their solution. Tsimes is that officials who push through this decision, having received sweet-smelling dollars, will no longer be in office when problems begin. Official "A" is no longer at his post, and official "B" did not make this decision and does not answer. democracy, freedom ... be they wrong.
          3. +13
            July 2 2021
            [/ quote] This is most likely never officials, this is probably the Afghan military, with combat experience, perhaps well-coordinated ... [quote]
            ... - That's exactly noticed! They are not refugees! This is the "Trojan horse" for the whole of Asia!
            1. +7
              July 2 2021
              Quote: Novichek)
              - That's exactly noticed! They are not refugees! This is the "Trojan horse" for the whole of Asia!

              Doesn't the example of Europe and refugees from the Middle East teach anyone at all ?! And the Central Asian "bai" are going to follow the lead of the States ?!
              Let the staff members take over the "Afghans" who are "loyal" to them! And then they are throwing their "sleeping" people, who will then redo the documents and come to Russia under the guise of laborers?
              I don’t think Russia needs American "Sinbads"!
            2. +5
              July 2 2021
              Quote: Novichek)
              That's exactly noticed! They are not refugees! This is the "Trojan horse" for all of Asia!

              A donkey laden with gold will open any gate
        2. +4
          July 3 2021
          Washington fears that after the withdrawal of the American military contingent they may be pursued by the Taliban *

          And why not take these people to the United States or allies in Europe and assign them refugee status. There is also solid tolerance, and the Afghans will not refuse.
        3. 0
          July 3 2021
          all the same, they betrayed their homeland and fell under the Americans


          After 89, about 300 thousand Afghan citizens were allowed to move to the Soviet Union.
          This is so, about traitors ... think at your leisure.
      2. +30
        July 2 2021
        In fact, the fifth column of the Yankees.
        Let them be hosted by NATO countries that participated in the Afghan campaign.
        1. +17
          July 2 2021
          It is they, under a noble pretext, who want to expand into the Central Asian republics, closer to us. at least.
          Let them send their agents to Pakistan.
          1. +14
            July 2 2021
            Maybe not so much expansion (9 thousand is not enough), but they definitely want to deploy their agents in these countries. Or are they not Americans.
            1. 0
              July 4 2021
              Quote: Artyom Karagodin
              Maybe not so much expansion (9 thousand is not enough), but they definitely want to deploy their agents in these countries. Or are they not Americans.


              Well, maybe the United States wants to deploy its agents and intelligence and act in the region, not only in Afghanistan. Yes, they would be so comfortable. The key word is "want," they also wanted to move the airbase from Afghanistan to Central Asia or Pakistan.
              Here, too, hardly anyone will agree.

              It looks like the drain of those who worked in Afghanistan for the United States and for whom crimes are listed that they will not be forgiven.
              The CIA and the Pentagon are in a not-so-good situation, they do not need these "Afghans" in the US (among them may be Al-Qaeda), the US does not even want to see the American military from Afghanistan and Iraq because their psyche is traumatized by the fact that the Americans created in the occupied countries, and these are all the more unnecessary for them.

              Accordingly, the Taliban will hang these conditional 9 thousand or do something with them, some of them will have to be eliminated by the United States. know a lot.

              Accordingly, the CIA and the Pentagon may ask how did you allow our allies to be left to certain death?
              Well, they will have an excuse like we made every possible effort to export to neighboring countries, but those radishes refused ...
          2. +7
            July 2 2021
            Let them send their agents to Pakistan.

            M .. to Pakistan? The one behind the Talibon? Sounds like a plan :)
        2. +2
          July 2 2021
          Quote: knn54
          In fact, the fifth column of the Yankees.
          Let them be hosted by NATO countries that participated in the Afghan campaign.

          Specifically the United States
        3. +19
          July 2 2021
          Quote: knn54
          Let them be hosted by NATO countries that participated in the Afghan campaign.

          The ISAF international military contingent in Afghanistan was represented in some years by 48 countries and not only NATO countries, there were Swedes, Ukrainians, New Zealanders, and Australians there. There were also NATO members there: Poles, Estonians, Lithuanians, Hungarians, Romanians, Czechs, etc. I really don’t understand why Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan should clean up. request
          1. +4
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Anatol Klim
            I really don’t understand why Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan should disentangle themselves.

            The withdrawal of the ISAF contingent is another blow to the gut of the Russian Federation at the Central Asian "bridgehead". Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan may well become three more "Ukrainians", but from a different direction. And in strategy it is the influence, or undermining of China along the Great Silk Road. Otherwise, they are not Americans ...
            1. +5
              July 2 2021
              That's for sure, everything is so, and the placement of "our people" in the CIS countries under the guise of refugees is a brilliant move. In less than a year, in these states interethnic conflicts will begin to flare up "suddenly", developing into a civil war, and all this will end - with the change of power to regular puppets. Is it possible that the leaders of Tajikistan and others will fall into this trap? Didn't you really understand?
            2. +3
              July 2 2021
              The withdrawal of the ISAF contingent is another blow to the gut of the Russian Federation at the Central Asian "bridgehead".

              It still needs to be seen.
              Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan may well become three more "Ukrainians

              They may or may not. Firstly, these countries are much more dependent on Russia and cooperation with it, the geographical position should also play a role.
              And in strategy, this is the influence, or undermining of China along the Great Silk Road

              m .. and there is another opinion, frankly the opposite of the voiced. The Taliban have used Pakistani territory as their rear ... and Pakistan has a very close relationship with China since our Afghan war. There is an opinion that the Chinese "comrades" are behind the Taliban's successes in recent years and that they just "cleaned" their "underbelly" from the Americans.
              1. +2
                July 2 2021
                Quote: alexmach
                m .. but there is another opinion, frankly the opposite of the sounded.

                It is easy to check with what weapons the Taliban are fighting, although it is quite problematic for China to carry out direct supplies of weapons to Afghanistan. Smuggling remains across the Tajik border. If so, then partly your "version" has the right to life. Well, Pakistan, of course.
                1. +1
                  July 2 2021
                  China is quite problematic to carry out direct arms supplies to Afghanistan

                  In 1983 alone, China sent 40 thousand tons of weapons and ammunition to the Mujahideen
                  Source: https://armflot.ru/kampanii/1632-gaubitsy-i-rakety-kak-kitajskoe-oruzhie-strelyalo-po-sovetskim-vojskam-v-afganistane

                  As if the experience is. Friends in Pakistan Yes, I don’t see what difficulties they may have with the supply of weapons there.
                  1. 0
                    July 2 2021
                    Quote: alexmach
                    As if the experience is. Friends in Pakistan Yes, I don’t see what difficulties they may have with the supply of weapons there.

                    I agree. But I think that Erdogan will play the main violin in the orchestra, and Turkey's Vasya with China behind NATO and the United States is nonsense, although ...
                    1. +2
                      July 3 2021
                      With Erdogan it is not clear, and he is more likely an ally of Russia there .. Erdogan has the Turkic world everywhere, and he will try to rely on local Uzbeks there too. How long they will find a common language with Tajiks or Pashtuns is not yet clear.
                      1. 0
                        July 3 2021
                        Quote: alexmach
                        Erdogan is not clear

                        And what about the Taliban and Erdogan?
                        1. 0
                          July 3 2021
                          Well, we'll see soon.
                        2. 0
                          July 3 2021
                          Quote: alexmach
                          Well, we'll see soon.

                          I think earlier than we expect it. The situation is extremely difficult.
                        3. +2
                          July 3 2021
                          The situation is extremely difficult

                          But I'm not inclined to dramatize this situation to be honest. I also understand the exceptional importance of Central Asia for Russia (It was necessary to first think of "throwing off an unnecessary ballast", letting them go from the Union, and now solving the problem of radical Islamism there, abroad. Damn geniuses of the late Soviet era, such as Gorbachev and Yeltsin). I understand the threats as well.

                          But there are still options for the development of events.
                          First, there is that very Central Asia that can be used as a front line and a buffer zone. Even if the expansion of radical Islam goes there, then this expansion can be fought there.

                          Secondly, it is not yet clear what exactly will happen in Afghanistan itself. They say he has changed, and the very Taliban have changed, what will be the internal situation there, which players will be really strong there, for example, what will the same Turkey be able to do there.

                          Well, no one has any doubts about the question of the article. Neither American sixes are needed there, much less bases, and, I repeat, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, in my opinion, also understand this no worse than we do. They don't need them either.
                        4. -1
                          July 3 2021
                          Quote: alexmach
                          what players will be really strong there, for example, what will the same Turkey be able to do there.

                          Well, the main "player" there will remain the United States. Afghanistan has changed ... the Taliban are not. Radical Islamists with their concept against the "civilized" world will not bring good.
                        5. +1
                          July 4 2021
                          Quote: Gardener91
                          Quote: alexmach
                          what players will be really strong there, for example, what will the same Turkey be able to do there.

                          Well, the main "player" there will remain the United States. Afghanistan has changed ... the Taliban are not. Radical Islamists with their concept against the "civilized" world will not bring good.


                          The United States is not a player there, they skewer, their actions are not a game, but situational actions from the prevailing situation. Moreover, the process of "retreat" has now been launched for the United States, only one scenario and the logic of behavior is to quickly get out, not to slow down anywhere, to look so that it does not gape somewhere, that would not pinch.

                          You probably consider the Taliban allies of the United States, this is not the case, this war was primarily the Taliban against the United States. They are just enemies.

                          And the Taliban have changed somewhat, there are not only Pashtuns, the composition is different.
                        6. -1
                          July 4 2021
                          1 - The United States does not skimp, leaving creates a real threat to the entire Central Asian region in the underbelly of the Russian Federation. 2 - The United States itself created the Taliban against the USSR, and I never mentioned the alliance of the states with the Islamists. 3 - the Taliban have not changed, like radical Islamism. Only Americans could invent a "moderate opposition" heresy.
              2. +2
                July 3 2021
                "stripped" of the Americans and their "underbelly"

                So we would not let 9000 US bayonets into our underbelly.
          2. +8
            July 2 2021
            Already two or even three times the Avgan military crossed over to the territory of Uzbekistan. Groups up to 50 people. They were firmly sent back afterwards. It is unlikely that Uzbekistan needs later graters with the Taliban.
        4. +5
          July 2 2021
          Quote: knn54
          Let them be hosted by NATO countries that participated in the Afghan campaign.

          This is how to cooperate with the states, "dumped and thrown." I do not envy these "refugees".
          1. +1
            July 3 2021
            And ours, after the first Chechen campaign, also abandoned the Chechens and Ingush policemen and military men who fought with us and they had someone to die, someone to flee with their families, because under Dudayev there was banditry and Sharia lawlessness, that's why they don't believe us either ...
      3. +12
        July 2 2021
        The United States intends to temporarily place about 9 thousand Afghan citizens who provided assistance to the Americans on the territory of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.

        I was waiting for this podlyany from the Amers, they just don't leave .. They came up with a clever idea!
        For these 9 thousand, they will go after them to look for them in order to take revenge on the traitors .. And a bloody mess will begin .. Let them be taken away by the bastards !!!
        1. +6
          July 2 2021
          Quote: xorek
          .Let them be taken by the bastards !!!

          Right. And it is in the USA. You need to feed your own ... and support for life. wassat
        2. +3
          July 2 2021
          Quote: xorek
          For these 9 thousand, they will go after them to look for them in order to take revenge on the traitors .. And a bloody mess will begin .. Let them be taken by the bastards !!

          Trouble, not the right word, there it will begin that it is difficult to imagine. And these are not ordinary farmers, but those who went with the enemy against their people with weapons in their hands. Yes, and then they will not come alone but with their families. So it doesn't smell like 9 here.
          1. +1
            July 2 2021
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Quote: xorek
            For these 9 thousand, they will go after them to look for them in order to take revenge on the traitors .. And a bloody mess will begin .. Let them be taken by the bastards !!

            Trouble, not the right word, there it will begin that it is difficult to imagine. And these are not ordinary farmers, but those who went with the enemy against their people with weapons in their hands. Yes, and then they will not come alone but with their families. So it doesn't smell like 9 here.

            I have warned the Kazakhs for a long time, arm yourself, contact the Russian military .. Any gang will pass through you like a knife through butter ..
            And then they sit there on gas and uranium, explored and built factories by the Soviet people and do not blow a mustache .. For example, Russia will protect, but baksheesh is more important to us.
          2. +1
            July 2 2021
            And these are not ordinary farmers, but those who went with the enemy against their people with weapons in their hands

            What is this difficult conclusion based on? It’s not very easy to figure out who “your people” is, there is such an ethnic team hodgepodge. There is essentially no one people there, especially after so many years of war and the division of the country into zones of influence.
        3. +1
          July 2 2021
          Quote: xorek
          The United States intends to temporarily place about 9 thousand Afghan citizens who provided assistance to the Americans on the territory of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.

          I was waiting for this podlyany from the Amers, they just don't leave .. They came up with a clever idea!
          For these 9 thousand, they will go after them to look for them in order to take revenge on the traitors .. And a bloody mess will begin .. Let them be taken away by the bastards !!!

          There was no sadness for us ... the Americans pumped up
          1. +2
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Clear
            There was no sadness for us ... the Americans pumped up

            As if this pumping, would not come back like a boomerang to the Amers on the continent .. Wait!
            1. +1
              July 2 2021
              Quote: xorek
              Quote: Clear
              There was no sadness for us ... the Americans pumped up

              As if this pumping, would not come back like a boomerang to the Amers on the continent .. Wait!

              Would help winked
              1. +1
                July 2 2021
                Quote: Clear
                Would help

                We help, but cowardly .. This is the problem with Russia, how not to offend anyone .. Yes, and the oligarchs among themselves there gyr gyr ..
            2. 0
              July 3 2021
              So they don't take them to themselves, so that nothing starts ...
      4. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
        All these fraternal Srenae-Asiatic peoples are ready, as one, under the sensitive American leadership ... What happiness!

        And then as with Ukraine.
      5. -1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
        All these fraternal Srenae-Asiatic peoples are ready, as one, under the sensitive American leadership ..

        And there and in the Russian Federation it is possible, because they say that it is difficult in the country without the delivery of "fast food" ...
    2. +6
      July 2 2021
      The White House appealed to the authorities of the three Central Asian republics to accommodate about 9 Afghan refugees on their territory. This measure is necessary to ensure the safety of Afghans who collaborated with the Americans.
      Why won't they take them overseas with them?
      1. +4
        July 2 2021
        The salary was given out in hashish, but in the USA it is expensive. No one likes traitors, even the owners.
        1. +8
          July 2 2021
          You explain this to velikukram ...
          1. +2
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Ruslan Sulima
            You explain this to velikukram ...

            Do they also hope that they will be taken away?
            1. +4
              July 2 2021
              HZ, maybe, out of habit, they will run to the invader ...
              Although blet will help me ... these dog children do not think about the reasons why I will not run to Russia. They fled, I did not, because this is my house and no strangers (Bandera, Raguli) will be in charge here. At least while he is alive, I hope that the children will live by similar principles.
              1. +1
                July 3 2021
                What can I say, I respect you and people like you. The pride of the Russian people.
                hi
                I have been waiting for revenge in Ukraine since the age of 14, I hope it will happen in my lifetime.
            2. +1
              July 2 2021
              Quote: Cheshire
              Do they also hope that they will be taken away?

              Hope always dies last.
          2. +2
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Ruslan Sulima
            You explain this to velikukram ...

            Useless! The American politician Zbigniew Brzezinski, back in 1998, in his book The Outer Chessboard of America's Primacy, wrote:

            "After the victory over communism, we need a split in Orthodoxy and the disintegration of Russia, and Ukraine will help us in this, where betrayal is the norm of public morality."
            1. -3
              July 2 2021
              Yes, Brzezinski with Brzezinski, like Putin with Putin or Zelensky with Poroshenko and Zelensky with Poroshenko are secondary
              1. +1
                July 2 2021
                Quote: Ruslan Sulima
                Yes Brzezinski with Brzezinski

                Yes, but! According to the concept of the collapse of the Russian Federation, the third (!) Administration of the US President is already operating. AND THIS, their strategy (
                1. +1
                  July 3 2021
                  I will correct, all administrations in the United States had a desire to destroy Russia at all times, they cannot live in peace, if someone has something more than they have, they have it like in Poland - the one who has more ...
                  1. 0
                    July 3 2021
                    Quote: restless
                    I will correct, all administrations in the United States had a desire to destroy Russia at all times

                    In the 90s, "such" Russia suited everyone.
      2. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Lesovik
        The White House appealed to the authorities of the three Central Asian republics to accommodate about 9 Afghan refugees on their territory. This measure is necessary to ensure the safety of Afghans who collaborated with the Americans.
        Why won't they take them overseas with them?

        So they would have taken them to themselves if they are so worried about them.
        I remember how they took them out of Syria, overgrown with looted property, with their families ... So here, probably, they gather.
        And our former republics are thinking to sit on two chairs at once, or what? In Uzbekistan, after all, they have already cooperated, but have changed their mind.
        1. +2
          July 2 2021
          Quote: Reptiloid
          And our former republics are thinking to sit on two chairs at once, or what?

          It all depends on how much the states will pay "cash dollars" to the authorities.
      3. +2
        July 2 2021
        Let the Sumerians watch what the "love friends" will do to them.
      4. +1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Lesovik
        Why won't they take them overseas with them?

        A used contraceptive, I always throw it in the trash.
        1. +2
          July 2 2021
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: Lesovik
          Why won't they take them overseas with them?

          A used contraceptive, I always throw it in the trash.

          It is not yet known how they will leave
          Why pick up? They learned from the British to leave in such a way that they would leave the conflict behind.
      5. 0
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Lesovik
        Why won't they take them overseas with them?

        What for? If there are countries nearby that will accommodate and feed ...
    3. +8
      July 2 2021
      It is still unknown how the persuasion will end.
      It is clear as daylight: it will end with permanent military bases at our "friends", at our side.
      1. +1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: astepanov
        It is clear as daylight: it will end with permanent military bases at our "friends", at our side.

        Expected. Moreover, with its "militants", 9 is already a division of thugs.
    4. +9
      July 2 2021
      This is very serious. Recruiters and emissaries of the militants will definitely be there. Preparing to invade the republics of Central Asia.
      It is already necessary to sound the alarm about this. The puppet Afghan government is likely to face the fate of Najibullah, or they are fleeing to the West.
      Who will take power and where he will move is already clear.
      1. +3
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Osipov9391
        Recruiters and emissaries of the militants will definitely be there. Preparing to invade the republics of Central Asia.

        So these "refugees are exactly those emissaries and recruiters. Is it really easy for them to live in the Central Asian republics after the" works of the righteous. "
        1. +1
          July 3 2021
          The theme of continuing to create hotbeds of tension near our borders
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: Osipov9391
          Recruiters and emissaries of the militants will definitely be there. Preparing to invade the republics of Central Asia.

          So these "refugees are exactly those emissaries and recruiters. Is it really easy for them to live in the Central Asian republics after the" works of the righteous. "
      2. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Osipov9391
        Already it is necessary to sound the alarm about this.

        The alarm had to be beaten back in the 90s of the last century, but everyone was doing business ...
      3. +3
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Osipov9391
        This is very serious. Recruiters and emissaries of the militants will definitely be there.

        I think that not only they will be there, but also the organizers of the heroin flow to the north.
    5. -17
      July 2 2021
      Maybe this is not a very beautiful comparison, but when we left Afghanistan, we left people loyal to us to their fate.
      So honor and praise to the Americans in this matter.
      1. +4
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Crown Prince
        Maybe this is not a very beautiful comparison, but when we left Afghanistan, we left people loyal to us to their fate.
        So honor and praise to the Americans in this matter.

        When we left Afghanistan, we left a completely viable government there, and this power rests on American bayonets.
      2. +3
        July 2 2021
        What is the honor and praise of the Americans? Explain
        1. -14
          July 2 2021
          The answer is obvious and lies on the surface, the Yankees do not abandon people in Afghanistan who trusted them. They will definitely die with the arrival of the Taliban in these areas.
          1. +3
            July 2 2021
            Uh-huh. Then the question. Are they going to throw the families of these people to pieces? Are the Americans not worried about these questions?
          2. +1
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Crown Prince
            The answer is obvious and lies on the surface, the Yankees do not abandon people in Afghanistan who trusted them.

            When the Nazis retreated, they also abandoned all the policemen and those who collaborated with them as an unnecessary thing. Everyone knows what happened to them.
            1. +1
              July 2 2021
              Well, what is the conversation about?
            2. 0
              July 3 2021
              This is not true, the policemen and the administration, who wanted to leave with the Germans, and whoever stayed, they were tried for imprisonment, rarely put anyone against the wall, which is why so many Bandera and policemen in Ukraine climbed out, if they were all destroyed after the war, there would not have been the current ziganutyh, otherwise it was who and to whom to pass on the experience ..
            3. 0
              July 3 2021
              Quote: tihonmarine
              Quote: Crown Prince
              The answer is obvious and lies on the surface, the Yankees do not abandon people in Afghanistan who trusted them.

              When the Nazis retreated, they also abandoned all the policemen and those who collaborated with them as an unnecessary thing. Everyone knows what happened to them.

              The Nazis were saving themselves, but not all were able to escape on their own. No one is stepping on the Americans' heels, and their goal is to leave and increase hotbeds of tension. Better if for us.
              Always ---- for your own benefit.
          3. 0
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Crown Prince
            The answer is obvious and lies on the surface, the Yankees do not abandon people in Afghanistan who trusted them.

            And this is not trying to explain the adept, who is on the site for only the 3rd day.
          4. 0
            July 3 2021
            The answer is obvious and lies on the surface, the Yankees do not abandon people in Afghanistan who trusted them.

            Already abandoned. For the kind of help, they are trying to shake them off to someone else. And where is the brave coalition? They don't want to shelter Afghans?
        2. 0
          July 2 2021
          Quote: Ruslan Sulima
          What is the honor and praise of the Americans?

          I don’t know how he will explain. But the Yankees threw up a decent one for the Asian republics and Russia.
      3. +3
        July 2 2021
        Wait for their "honor" to reason. Many Afghans have left rather than abandoned.
      4. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Crown Prince
        Maybe this is not a very beautiful comparison, but when we left Afghanistan, we left people loyal to us to their fate.

        Well, yes, the family of a "loyal" communist was taken out to their side, Mustafa Nayem.
    6. +4
      July 2 2021
      Oh how! Drive the Trojan horse and certainly closer to the borders of Russia. Bastards.
    7. +5
      July 2 2021
      As always. The United States has shit, and take away the others after them. Let them take them to Texas, Kansas and Oklahoma.
    8. +4
      July 2 2021
      Training camps don't get anyone in our underbelly .. that's the real goal ..
    9. +6
      July 2 2021
      Who the hell needs them here, let it be better to take them to America for a puddle.
      1. +1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Ros 56
        Who the hell needs them here, let it be better to take them to America for a puddle.

        No, what are you! What if they can't adapt to the Americas? What if they don’t survive the flight? What if they don't get fast food? What if they don’t survive the absence of donkeys and camels there? No no no. Americans are not monsters. Maximum comfort and convenience for Afghan brothers. Accommodation with neighbors at the expense of neighbors with subsequent displacement of neighbors. good
    10. +1
      July 2 2021
      Let them take away. Why are these poor fellows sleeping US agents inside their countries?
    11. +3
      July 2 2021
      It was the same in Vietnam. Only Americans were put on helicopters in Saigon.
      1. 0
        July 3 2021
        Vietnamese were also taken if there were places.
    12. +2
      July 2 2021
      The United States intends to temporarily place about 9 thousand Afghan citizens who have provided assistance to the Americans on the territory of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.

      As you know, everything temporary is eternal. And then the relatives will come in large numbers. And a little later, the gloomy Taliban will come and ask: well, well, who sheltered our American henchmen here?
      1. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Polite Elk
        And a little later, the gloomy Taliban will come and ask: well, well, who sheltered our American henchmen here?
        You will have to answer for the market, and not childishly.
        1. +2
          July 2 2021
          Quote: tihonmarine
          You will have to answer for the market, and not childishly.

          Or join those who ask.
          1. +2
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Polite Elk
            Or join those who ask.

            And there will be no other way out. Or with them, or a poleaxe.
            1. +2
              July 2 2021
              Quote: tihonmarine
              And there will be no other way out. Or with them, or a poleaxe.

              Well, or the total mining of the border line and other measures to strengthen the borders. It is easier and cheaper to send p-owls with their Afghan stepsons in a neighborly way on an erotic walking tour.
    13. Eug
      +3
      July 2 2021
      Tough filtration and control by the republics' special services, generous funding from the United States. But this is fantastic - really corrupt Asians will lie under the mattresses ...
      1. +3
        July 2 2021
        But this is fantastic - really corrupt Asians will lie under the mattresses.

        Well, if they are completely fools ...

        Another point - the Taliban will declare enemies who will support the Americans, especially military support, the same intelligence bases mentioned in the article.
      2. +1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Eug

        Strict filtration and control by the republics' special services

        Even if this happened, much more rubbish would leak out than ordinary servants of the United States. In a year or two, they will receive Central Asian passports, and everyone can guess where they will find themselves disguised as guest workers.
    14. +3
      July 2 2021
      And they will drive their own, who specifically "collaborated" with them, the fifth column to Central Asia! Is this something even those who give consent understand?
      1. +1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Vladimir61
        And they will drive their own, who specifically "collaborated" with them, the fifth column to Central Asia! Is this something even those who give consent understand?

        Most likely the sight is on the RF, well, if you understand ...
    15. +2
      July 2 2021
      Well done to the Americans.
      Well done.
      So they just took and appointed the neighbors as extreme.
      Like we decided here that you owe us.

      On the other hand, they don't abandon their own people. Nashimm would like to learn so.
      1. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        On the other hand, they don't abandon their own people. Nashimm would like to learn so.

        Yes, here the question is very interesting, in Vietnam everyone was thrown, in Iraq too, even the Kurds were thrown, but why are they trying to resettle the Afghans?
        Reportedly, the foreign ministers of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan are currently on a visit to Washington and it is planned that a corresponding agreement on the placement of refugees will be signed in the near future.
        And this is all at the highest level, and if you think about WHY? Isn't the rationale behind this placement clear? And everything is visible as on glass.
    16. +4
      July 2 2021
      these are the same refugees who then turn into isis
    17. sen
      +2
      July 2 2021
      So there were reports in the media that they also want to withdraw their military to these Central Asian republics, and the Afghans probably go as an appendage for organizing color revolutions.
      https://www.gazeta.ru/army/2021/05/10/13587554.shtml
      1. +1
        July 2 2021
        Quote: sen
        So there were media reports that they also want to withdraw their military to these Central Asian republics.

        Well, it’s straightforward
        In addition, the United States intends to obtain permission from Tashkent and Dushanbe to conduct reconnaissance from their territories.
        Where to conduct intelligence, in which country? Well, not in Afghanistan, in my opinion, it is clear where this intelligence is aimed, and not by the forces of the Americans, but by the forces of these "refugees", and not intelligence, but rather terror.
    18. +3
      July 2 2021
      The Toyan horse looks like this today.
    19. +2
      July 2 2021
      This is a drop in the ocean. The total number of Afghans who collaborated with the United States and allies is estimated at 100 tons. Plus their families. And the fate of these people can be very sad ...
      I remember in the 90s I worked with one Afghan at the Cherkizovsky market. I see he's kind of untypical. The kind is intelligent. He speaks good Russian. It turned out to be a former doctor. Graduated from our university. And then our troops are withdrawing from Afghanistan. By hook or by crook, he fled to the USSR with his family. Then he dangled unnecessary to anyone, without documents ... He worked as a loader in the market. Janitor. Then he met Pakistanis. I knew the language. The mentality is clear. And slowly got up. Its point has appeared. Wealth. Once I got my younger brother out of Afghanistan. But here is cunning. I didn’t like working with him, I felt that my upbringing and mentality was different.
      On the one hand, this Afghan was glad that he managed to leave Afghanistan safe and sound, on the other hand, he was offended by Russia, that they were no one here, without status and help, although there they supported the USSR, risking their lives ...
      1. +2
        July 2 2021
        Quote: Moskovit
        This is a drop in the ocean. The total number of Afghans who collaborated with the United States and allies is estimated at 100 tons. Plus their families. And the fate of these people can be very sad ...
        I remember in the 90s I worked with one Afghan at the Cherkizovsky market. I see he's kind of untypical. The kind is intelligent. He speaks good Russian. It turned out to be a former doctor. Graduated from our university. And then our troops are withdrawing from Afghanistan. By hook or by crook, he fled to the USSR with his family. Then he dangled unnecessary to anyone, without documents ... He worked as a loader in the market. Janitor. Then he met Pakistanis. I knew the language. The mentality is clear. And slowly got up. Its point has appeared. Wealth. Once I got my younger brother out of Afghanistan. But here is cunning. I didn’t like working with him, I felt that my upbringing and mentality was different.
        On the one hand, this Afghan was glad that he managed to leave Afghanistan safe and sound, on the other hand, he was offended by Russia, that they were no one here, without status and help, although there they supported the USSR, risking their lives ...

        Well, they are in vain - the Russian Federation and the USSR have nothing in common. Well, except for the name of the capital and the music of the anthem.
        1. 0
          July 2 2021
          Quote: Doliva63
          Well, they are in vain - the Russian Federation and the USSR have nothing in common.

          Well, how do they not? And Tajiks, Uzbeks, Afghans, etc. living in this territory?
          1. 0
            July 2 2021
            Quote: Tank Hard
            Quote: Doliva63
            Well, they are in vain - the Russian Federation and the USSR have nothing in common.

            Well, how do they not? And Tajiks, Uzbeks, Afghans, etc. living in this territory?

            Uh, Soviet Tajiks lived in the Union, and I don’t know who today is, tumbleweed. Different things. I mean, Tajiks, of course. I completely trusted the Soviets.
            1. +1
              July 2 2021
              I completely trusted the Soviets.

              Well, I also trusted the Soviet Ukrainians, but I don't trust the present ones, after 30 years of headwashing.
              1. 0
                July 3 2021
                Quote: Aviator_
                I completely trusted the Soviets.

                Well, I also trusted the Soviet Ukrainians, but I don't trust the present ones, after 30 years of headwashing.

                So there was no and there are no Ukrainians - they were recorded in them. There live the same people right now, like those who watched the shooting of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow on TV in 93. What's the difference?
                1. +1
                  July 3 2021
                  There live the same people right now, like those who watched the shooting of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow on TV in 93. What's the difference?

                  Well, first of all, almost all of Russia watched the shooting of the Armed Forces in 1993 on TV. The army, except for the sailors Sergei Ostapenko and himself, sat out, and the most greedy for money climbed into these 4 tanks. True, during the autumn assault on Grozny in 1994, one of them was caught by the Chechens and shown on TV.
                  And there is a difference, and a significant one. 30 years of brainwashing (sorry, skullcaps) led to the creation of a "new man" in Sumeria, this is the difference - we have Vlasov's banner, but no one considers Vlasov a hero, either at the state level or at the household level. And there, in Sumeria, Bandera is their hero.
                  1. +1
                    July 3 2021
                    Quote: Aviator_
                    There live the same people right now, like those who watched the shooting of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow on TV in 93. What's the difference?

                    Well, first of all, almost all of Russia watched the shooting of the Armed Forces in 1993 on TV. The army, except for the sailors Sergei Ostapenko and himself, sat out, and the most greedy for money climbed into these 4 tanks. True, during the autumn assault on Grozny in 1994, one of them was caught by the Chechens and shown on TV.
                    And there is a difference, and a significant one. 30 years of brainwashing (sorry, skullcaps) led to the creation of a "new man" in Sumeria, this is the difference - we have Vlasov's banner, but no one considers Vlasov a hero, either at the state level or at the household level. And there, in Sumeria, Bandera is their hero.

                    For the Vlasov banner - respect! I don’t respect it myself. And at the expense of the inhabitants of the former USSR - so we have not gone far away. We allow others to do with us what they want, alas. The same rams.
      2. 0
        July 2 2021
        How weak is it for them to take the Vietnamese?
        Weak ... All 100000!
        hi
        1. 0
          July 2 2021
          There, as well as in the EU, there are plenty of them, and their mafia is sometimes "cooler" than the Chinese and Italian ones.
          1. 0
            July 2 2021
            There are plenty of them - who are there?
            1. 0
              July 2 2021
              Vietnamese and Afghans
              1. +1
                July 2 2021
                It means that one hundred thousand Afgvnts in the EU will not interfere. Have EU countries been to Afghanistan? There were. So, using the words of Japanese anime girls - let them take responsibility for themselves! And they will "shelter" their Afghan assistants!
                They will "smear" them across the EU and it will seem that there are not so many of them.
      3. +2
        July 2 2021
        on the other, the resentment was against Russia that they were no one here, without status and help

        The typical fate of an emigrant.
    20. +5
      July 2 2021
      hmm ..., but this is us trying to lay a time bomb ...
      1. +2
        July 2 2021
        still what !!!!! there will be explosions in the subway, etc. ............
      2. +3
        July 2 2021
        Quote: faiver
        hmm ..., but this is us trying to lay a time bomb ...


        Definitely ...
    21. +3
      July 2 2021
      and then all this pack will end up in RUSSIA in Moscow ...
    22. +3
      July 2 2021
      Americans! You and only you are responsible for those you have tamed.
    23. +2
      July 2 2021
      They took the Vietnamese to their place, but they don't want these?
      Or banal the fleet cannot be "driven" to the shores of Afghanistan ...
    24. +1
      July 2 2021
      I wonder how many true refugees are there? It is convenient, after all, and without problems, under the guise of "refugees" to drive into the underbelly of Russia various prohibited. The legend is iron. And the Central Asian bai for a small bakshish will do something and close their eyes.
    25. +1
      July 2 2021
      Finally, they will be given happiness, a lot of happiness. Now the Central Asian heads will start to fall.
    26. +4
      July 2 2021
      The United States intends to temporarily place about 9 thousand Afghan citizens who have provided assistance to the Americans on the territory of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.


      Here are the cunning and the refugees themselves want to gain a foothold in the same place. If they are accepted, they will remain there for a very long time and US bases will appear.
    27. +1
      July 2 2021
      It's time to cover the Russian-Kazakh border in military, operational and engineering terms, then it will be too late ...
      It is unlikely that the skullcaps will hold back the impulses of the "refugees" to their desire to go to the North ...
    28. 0
      July 2 2021
      why won't you take these Afghans with you in June? because their planes still fly ...
      1. 0
        July 3 2021
        It would not be logical. No.
    29. +1
      July 2 2021
      This suggests an analogy with the Syrian refugee camp in the American zone of occupation, where ISIS members from this camp train fighters for themselves under the strict supervision of the delta and sasa

      It's clear as daylight that this is a Trojan horse.
      The question is - will they buy buys or not?
    30. +3
      July 2 2021
      Very soon they will be with us, trained and prepared by "partners" and with passports of the Russian Federation, as is usually the case with us. In addition to bacteriological laboratories, reconnaissance and sabotage centers were added to the "appendage". In the Baltic States, too, with 2 aircraft and 15 specialists in their maintenance began. Well done, they are doing everything right, and why not, if it is possible and nothing will happen for it. Another thing is striking, the complete failure and helplessness of our "nobility", the amazing inaction and carelessness, bordering on sabotage to defend and protect the vital critical interests of our state. The situation of Russian-speaking people and the situation in the same Kyrgyz Republic is no better than on an independent one, and in many issues it is even worse, again the complete inactivity of our boyars and the complete initiative of overseas "partners" on our lands, which is not treason. Stupidity and stupidity are worse than stealing, our people are wise. Why do we need power for our upper class, why do they need all this loot, with which they do not know what to do because of their level of intelligence, inconsistency of thinking and cowardice, why do they need all this, for which they cling to the poor with their little hands, going to any lies and crimes , from which they look even more pitiful, covering their insignificance with portraits and past victories of our ancestors and the achievements of the great people, which they betrayed and robbed, continuing to lie and destroy, which they fear and despise.
    31. +4
      July 2 2021
      There was a coalition in Afghanistan. Let the Bezhents be distributed among the countries that were in this coalition!
      USA, UK, Australia, Romania, Georgia, Canada, Italy and so on.
      Let them deliver one hundred thousand loyal Afghans to these countries !!!
    32. +1
      July 2 2021
      Let them be sent to Poland or the Baltic states, they have a shortage of people there!
    33. 0
      July 3 2021
      The United States found a way to deploy a significant number of its agents with combat experience in the Central Asian republics in order to be able to destabilize the situation in them or organize a coup at any time. In the place of the leaders of these republics, I did not agree for any money. I think this US intelligence operation is called "Trojan Horse"
    34. 0
      July 3 2021
      .. And then it turns out that these "refugees" are ready-made cells of fighters who will easily move from the Central Asian republics to us .. Excellent decision of the Americans. Ours to learn and learn ..
    35. 0
      July 3 2021
      If the officials of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan sign this agreement, this will say that they have betrayed their people and will certainly receive good interest and guarantees for themselves and their families, because by signing this agreement, the bulk of the refugees will be militants who will destabilize and will flood Central Asia with blood, followed by an eye on Russia and China
    36. 0
      July 3 2021
      This is a Trojan horse to the republics!
    37. 0
      July 3 2021
      Do you believe that it will be the Afghans? And why is the Zhmerika so concerned about the fate of some "rabies" there? It didn't work out in Syria to arrange bedlam in order to further penetrate into Central Asia, so they decided to make a knight's move, now through Afghanistan.
    38. 0
      July 3 2021
      Undoubtedly, the Central Asian buys will help specific people Yankos for a small bribe.
      They are "fraternal narodi" only when the Russian Federation gives them money. Business only drinks
    39. +1
      July 3 2021
      Absolutely, they need to be exported to Ukraine!)
    40. 0
      July 3 2021
      Sounds like bullshit. Russia will not allow these "dances" ...
    41. 0
      July 3 2021
      How is that? For 20 years, the United States has failed to make Afghanistan a paradise on earth. Make him a world leader in terms of living standards. With total control over everything and everyone. With such a military presence. All implanted democratic values.
      And now they are thinking where to put their supporters. For whom the only option to live longer than a year and a half is to get out of Afghanistan from the "gratitude" of compatriots.
      This is a great example for our non-systemic fellow citizens. I think that America will come, it will put things in order. Although ... no. This is not an indicator for them. After all, they are not some Afghans, Libyans, Iraqis, Ukrainians ... etc. Underline whatever applicable. They are convinced that they will definitely succeed.
    42. +1
      July 3 2021
      Let them place it at their place. Their jackals)
    43. +1
      July 4 2021
      Temporarily - MEANS FOREVER! American women always abandon their allies if they smell fried! Let them be taken to them!
    44. 0
      July 4 2021
      yes, refugees. but most of them will bode well for these two Republics. by order of the same yus. let them shelter at home or in england.
    45. 0
      July 4 2021
      The sheep are safe, but there will be fresh meat every day.
    46. +1
      July 4 2021
      Excited "patriots" who sucked a pacifier in the 90s are invited to exhale. Since 92, civilians and driven Afghans have been planned to settle in the former Soviet republics and individual cities of the Russian Federation. The circle is complete.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"